Concord Fencing Club Class Notes Etude De Fer #1–D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

CONCORD FENCING CLUB CLASS NOTES ETUDE DE FER #1 – DIRECT SEQUENCE Paired Drills – Epee II students assist Epee I Repeat each of the following 3-4 times successfully, then switch roles, then progress to the next drill. 0) Direct Attack - with Advance-Lunge a. Fencer A makes a thrust to the inside-high (IH) line on the advance (with rear foot); b. Fencer B retreats without parry or counterattack c. Fencer A continues with a lunge to hit the wrist (or elbow; experiment with distance) 1) Feint-Continue - with Advance-Lunge a. Fencer A makes a thrust to the (IH) line on the advance (with front foot); b. Fencer B retreats without parry or counterattack c. Fencer A completes advance-lunge to hit the wrist (or elbow; experiment with distance) 2) Feint-Disengage, Lateral - with Advance-Lunge a. Fencer A makes a thrust to the (IH) line on the advance (with front foot); b. Fencer B retreats and makes a parry 4 c. Fencer A lunges with an indirect thrust to hit the wrist (or elbow) 3) Feint-Disengage, Vertical - with Advance-Lunge a. Fencer A makes a thrust to the (IH) line on the advance (with front foot); b. Fencer B retreats and makes a parry 4 c. Fencer A lunges with an indirect thrust to hit the thigh or flank 4) Feint-Beat - with Advance-Lunge a. Fencer A makes a thrust to the (IH) line on the advance (with front foot); b. Fencer B retreats and extends, making a counterattack inside c. Fencer A executes a beat in 4 (with rear foot) and lunges to hit the wrist 5) Feint-Prise de Fer - with Advance-Flèche a. Fencer A makes a thrust to the (IH) line on the advance (with front foot); b. Fencer B retreats and extends, making a counterattack inside c. Fencer A takes the blade in 6 (with rear foot) and flèches to hit the shoulder or chest d. (Fencer A runs past; Fencer B turns around; both come on guard and resume.) Advanced Drills – Epee II I. Repeat selected drills from above with various initial lines: a. Begin with a feint in the outside-high, outside-low, or inside-low line II. Decision Drills based on selected drills above: a. E.g. Between (2) and (4) or between (3) and (5) b. Sequence: Blocked drills (as above), Alternating, then Random .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Novel Lunge Biomechanics in Modern Sabre Fencing
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Engineering 112 ( 2015 ) 473 – 478 7th Asia-Pacific Congress on Sports Technology, APCST 2015 Novel Lunge Biomechanics in Modern Sabre Fencing Kevin C. Moorea; Frances M. E. Chowb; John Y. H. Chowb a Re-embody,b 1300 Asia Standard Tower, 59-65 Queen’s Road Central Hong Kong SAR Sydney Sabre, Level 1, 112-116 Parramatta Road Stanmore NSW 2048, Australia Abstract Sabre is one of the three disciplines in the sport of fencing, characterised by the use of a lightweight cutting weapon to score hits on an opponent while maneuvering for position with rapid and dynamic footwork. One of the main techniques is the lunge: an explosive extension of the fencer’s body propelled by the non-dominant (ND) leg in which the dominant (D) leg is kicked forward. The lunge provides both power and range (up to 3m) to the fencer and helps accelerate the sword for a rapid strike. Classical fencing lunges differ in style but share a common mechanism: a forward leap originating in the ND leg that powers rotation in a highly mobile thoracic cage. A new generation of fencers has begun to deviate from the classical lunge mechanism in recent years with a ND leg adopting a rigid momentum-conserving structure. This constant ND knee extension yields a constant rotational acceleration of the pelvis toward the dominant side and emphases scapular rotation to transfer power to the sword arm compared to thoracic rotation in classical lunges. We hypothesized that the new lunge mechanism delivers greater power, efficiency, range, and acceleration than the classical lunge.
[Show full text]
Downloaded and Shared for Private Use Only – Republication, in Part Or in Whole, in Print Or Online, Is Expressly Forbidden Without the Written Consent of the Author
The International Armizare Society Presents: Beginning Armizare An Introduction to Medieval Swordsmanship Gregory D. Mele © 2001 - 2016 Beginning Armizare: An Introduction to Medieval Swordsmanship Copyright Notice: © 2014 Gregory D. Mele, All Rights Reserved. This document may be downloaded and shared for private use only – republication, in part or in whole, in print or online, is expressly forbidden without the written consent of the author. ©2001-2016 Gregory D. Mele Page 2 Beginning Armizare: An Introduction to Medieval Swordsmanship TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 4 Introduction: The Medieval Art of Arms 5 I. Spada a Dui Mani: The Longsword 7 II. Stance and Footwork 9 III. Poste: The Guards of the Longsword 14 IV. Learning to Cut with the Longsword 17 V. Defending with the Fendente 23 VI. Complex Blade Actions 25 VII. Parrata e Risposta 25 Appendix A: Glossary 28 Appendix B: Bibliography 30 Appendix C: Armizare Introductory Class Lesson Plan 31 ©2001-2016 Gregory D. Mele Page 3 Beginning Armizare: An Introduction to Medieval Swordsmanship FOREWORD The following document was originally developed as a study guide and training companion for students in the popular "Taste of the Knightly Arts" course taught by the Chicago Swordplay Guild. It has been slightly revised, complete with the 12 class outline used in that course in order to assist new teachers, small study groups or independent students looking for a way to begin their study of armizare. Readers should note that by no means is this a complete curriculum. There is none of the detailed discussion of body mechanics, weight distribution or cutting mechanics that occurs during classroom instruction, nor an explanation of the number of paired exercises that are used to develop student's basic skills, outside of the paired techniques, or "set-plays," themselves.
[Show full text]
Basic Actor Combatant Glossary 2012
= BASIC ACTOR COMBATANT GLOSSARY March 2, 2012 This is a living document and while Fight Directors Canada seeks to keep this glossary up to date it is simply impossible to list all terms or techniques. Individual teachers may add to what is listed or suggest an alternative meaning or explanation for a particular term or technique. If there is a disagreement between what is written and what is taught in class the written test will err on side of the instructor. Section 1: General Stage Combat Terms Section 2: Footwork, Stance and Posture Section 2: Unarmed Section 3: Quarterstaff Section 4: Single Sword Section 5: Weapons and Accoutrements Section 6: Theatrical & Performance Section 7: Alternate Terms Section 8: Diagrams All references and definitions originally taken from, ‘The Complete Encyclopedia of Arms and Armour’ Claude Blair & Leonid Tarassuk, ‘The Martini A-Z of Fencing’ E.D. Morton, ‘The Art and History of Personal Combat’ Arthur Wise. They were subsequently edited by Todd Campbell, Siobhán Richardson, Kevin Robinson, Casey Hudecki, Daniel Levinson, Paul Gelieanu, Ian Rose, Simon Fon and Kirsten Gundlack Fight Directors, Canada wishes to express their gratitude to the above named authors and editors for their invaluable assistance. FDC Basic Actor Combatant Glossary – 02 25 2012 page 1 of 18 SECTION 1: GENERAL STAGE COMBAT TERMS SECTION 1: GENERAL STAGE COMBAT TERMS aikido roll: A roll that resembles the shoulder roll but rather than using both hand and arms to lower the body to the floor the dominate arm is curved and used to guide the upper body to the floor.
[Show full text]
Fencing Club By-Laws: Ranking System
Fencing Club By-Laws: Ranking System Ranks are marked by colored bands beneath the shoulder patch. Testing occurs on individual occasions as determined by the Head Instructor. Members wishing to test can do so only if the Head Instructor offers to perform the testing. If a member wishes for a testing, the candidate cannot bring the request to the Head Instructor's attention, but must instead convince a member in good standing of at least the rank he/she wishes to test for (and at least the 2nd rank) to act as a sponsor on his/her behalf. This sponsor is also responsible for making sure the candidate is adequately prepared for the rank testing. When the testing occurs, all actions requiring 2 people will be performed by the candidate and her/his sponsor. The Head Instructor (the tester) will direct the actions and observe so as to score the candidate. The candidate should not be penalized for mistakes made by the sponsor; instead, the Head Instructor should ask them to repeat the action. Each rank confers upon the fencer a set of permissions to accompany their new rank. First Rank – Yellow Band - Beginning Foil Requirements: A) Length of attendance: Minimum attendance time before testing: 15 practices, with discretion for those with previous experience B) Candidate should have participated in at least two assaults previously with instructors. The Testing: The purpose of the 1st rank testing is for the candidate to demonstrate the knowledge and ability needed to fence safely with the foil in a bout. A) Candidate must demonstrate the following skills/techniques: Notice, all techniques should be done from a proper guard, attacks should be done with a properly executed lunge, etc.
[Show full text]
The Most Common Mistakes Beginning Rapier Students Make - Their Consequences and How to Avoid Them
The Most Common Mistakes Beginning Rapier Students Make - Their Consequences and How to Avoid Them. by Tom Leoni ©2005 As with most demanding disciplines, fencing has its set of common beginners’ mistakes. Having practiced, taught and observed historical fencers of all levels for over a decade, I have compiled a list of the more obvious and recurring ones. Interestingly, these are mistakes that, if not cured early, crystallize into bad habits that are very hard to amend later on. These mistakes are in both understanding and performance - often in both at the same time (the former being a prerequisite for the latter). I have outlined each point so as to list the mistake, the negative consequences deriving from it and my recommendations on how to correct it. Although I have purposely confined this discussion to the rapier, please note that many of these mistakes/habits are applicable to other fencing disciplines. Also, please note that the actions and situations I describe imply a somewhat formalized training intent based on historical sources. Many who enjoy swords casually and do not have the opportunity to train more formally may not identify with these points. Mistake: Obsessing too much about ideal rapier length. Consequences: Illusion that technical or theoretical shortcomings are "the rapier’s fault," resulting in failure to address them. Correction: Get a well-balanced rapier that works for you and then give it no more thought. Masters such as Alfieri and Capoferro specify that a rapier should be proportionate to the height of the fencer - it should comfortably stand under the armpit.
[Show full text]
Introduction to Rapier
INTRODUCTION TO RAPIER Based on the teachings of Ridolfo Capo Ferro, in his treatise first published in 1610. A WORKBOOK By Nick Thomas Instructor and co-founder of the © 2016 Academy of Historical Fencing Version 1 Introduction The rapier is the iconic sword of the renaissance, but it is often misunderstood due to poor representation in popular culture. The reality of the rapier is that it was a brutal and efficient killer. So much so that in Britain it was often considered a bullies or murderers weapon. Because to use a rapier against a person is to attempt to kill them, and not just defend oneself. A result of the heavy emphasis on point work and the horrendous internal damage that such thrust work inflicts. Rapier teachings were first brought to Britain in the 1570’s, and soon became the dominant weapon for civilian wear. Of course many weapons that were not so different were also used in the military, featuring the same guards and slightly lighter and broader blades. The rapier was very commonly used with offhand weapons, and Capo Ferro covers a range of them. However for this work book, we will focus on single sword, which is the foundation of the system. This class is brought to you by the Academy of Historical Fencing (UK) www.historicalfencing.co.uk If you have any questions about the class or fencing practice in general, feel free to contact us – [email protected] Overview of the weapon The First thing to accept as someone who already studies one form or another of European swordsmanship, is that you should not treat the rapier as something alien to you.
[Show full text]
The Neapolitan School of Fencing: Its Origins and Early Characteristics
Acta Periodica Duellatorum 9 DOI 10.1515/apd-2015-0012 The Neapolitan School of Fencing: Its Origins and Early Characteristics Charles Blair Abstract – The Neapolitan school of fencing, which received official sanction after the reunification of Italy in the nineteenth century, originated in the seventeenth century. It was originally best known as a system of sword and dagger fencing. It is documented as such in both Italian and Spanish sources during the reign of Carlos II and the War of the Spanish Succession (1665-1714). This article discusses the evidence from both sets of sources during this period, comparing and contrasting the Neapolitan approach to previous, contemporary and subsequent approaches in order to provide the necessary historical context for its origin and development. I. ORIGIN OF THE NEAPOLITAN SCHOOL The Neapolitan school of fencing begins with Giovan Battista (“Titta”) Marcelli, who died in 1685.1 He lived until he was past 90, so he cannot have been born later than 1595. Marcelli was from an old Roman family, but at some point he moved from Rome to Naples; we do not know when or why. We do know that he left a brother Lelio behind in Rome, and a son who published a treatise in 1686. Marcelli not only lived to an advanced age; we are told that even towards the end of his life he continued to give lessons and move like a man in the prime of life. Marcelli was known for a lightning-fast lunge: before one realized what was happening, one was hit; therefore, one could not craft a defence.
[Show full text]
The Fight Master, October 1978, Vol. 1 Issue 3
Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Fight Master Magazine The Society of American Fight Directors 10-1978 The Fight Master, October 1978, Vol. 1 Issue 3 The Society of American Fight Directors Follow this and additional works at: https://mds.marshall.edu/fight Part of the Acting Commons, Other Theatre and Performance Studies Commons, Performance Studies Commons, and the Theatre History Commons Recommended Citation The Society of American Fight Directors, "The Fight Master, October 1978, Vol. 1 Issue 3" (1978). Fight Master Magazine. 3. https://mds.marshall.edu/fight/3 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The Society of American Fight Directors at Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fight Master Magazine by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. the Property of the ~.ltde±ti .of fi9bt J\mericmt Jlfigl1t Ji}tr£cfon_; rnasteu tbe societiY o,i: ameuican ,i:igbt <liuectons '1 IMlt'I' ------------------------------ REPLICA SWORDS 'rhe· Magazine of the Society of American Fight Directors We carry a wide selection of replica No. 3 October 1978 swords for theatrical and decorative use. Editor - Mike McGraw Lay-out - David L. Boushey RECOMMENDED BY THE ,'1 SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FIGHT DIRECTORS Typed and Duplicated by Mike McGraw I *************************************** ~oci~ty of American Yi£ht Directors The second Society of Fight Directors in the world has been I incorporated in Seattle, Washington. Its founder is David I IIi Boushey, Overseas Affiliate of the Society of British Fight ' Directors. OFFICERS: President - David L.
[Show full text]
Glossary of Terms, 2016 (PDF Version)
The Society of American Fight Directors GLOSSARY OF TERMS (revised as of 3/19/16) It is important to note that the terms listed below may not correspond to the proper definitions of the actions as they are applied to historical or modern fencing, swordplay, boxing or wrestling. These terms are theatrical in nature, not tactical, describing the action as it is executed in the performance environment. General Use Terms Active Hand: The non-weapon bearing hand used to block, check, lock, parry, strike, or trap the opposing weapon or parts of a partner’s body. Attacker (also called Aggressor): The actor/combatant who initiates the offensive action or attack. Center Line: An imaginary line that bisects the body. Horizontal Center Line (also called Mid Line): The imaginary line that bisects the body horizontally at waist level delineating High Line and Low Line. Vertical Center Line: The imaginary line that bisects the body vertically through the center delineating Inside Line and Outside Line. Cue: a physical action or event that is a signal for someone to do something. Cue-Reaction-Action: A basic stage combat principle/process used to achieve a safe and dramatically effective sequence of events Distance (also called Measure, Fighting Measure, and/or Fencing Measure): The proper measure between two or more combatants to safely execute any particular technique in stage combat. En Garde: The basic physical "ready" position of a combatant. Eye Contact: A look to one’s partner to assure mutual awareness and readiness to perform the techniques. Fighting Measure/Fencing Measure): see Distance Hand Positions: Pronation: The palm is turned down.
[Show full text]
Visualization of Technical and Tactical Characteristics in Fencing
Visualization of Technical and Tactical Characteristics in Fencing Mingdong Zhang, Li Chen, Xiaoru Yuan, Renpei Huang, Shuang Liu, and Junhai Yong Fig. 1. Men’s Sabre Individual Golden Match of 2017 World Fencing Championship in FencingVis. (A) Phrase List View shows the tactical usage of the fencers in each phrase. (B) Tactic Flow Graph View shows the statistics of the tactic usage in the whole bout. (C) Piste View shows the animation of the selected phrase. (D) Bout View shows the changing of the scores and the duration of each phrase. (E) Control Pannel provides set of controls to support interactive exploration. Abstract— Fencing is a sport that relies heavily on the use of tactics. However, most existing methods for analyzing fencing data are based on statistical models in which hidden patterns are difficult to discover. Unlike sequential games, such as tennis and table tennis, fencing is a type of simultaneous game. Thus, the existing methods on the sports visualization do not operate well for fencing matches. In this study, we cooperated with experts to analyze the technical and tactical characteristics of fencing competitions. To meet the requirements of the fencing experts, we designed and implemented FencingVis, an interactive visualization system for fencing competition data. The action sequences in the bout are first visualized by modified bar charts to reveal the actions of footworks and bladeworks of both fencers. Then an interactive technique is provided for exploring the patterns of behavior of fencers. The different combinations of tactical behavior patterns are further mapped to the graph model and visualized by a tactical flow graph.
[Show full text]
Fencing Rules
FENCING RULES 1995 Edition United States Fencing Association, Inc. © United States Fencing Association, Inc. 1995 FOREWORD This American version of the international rules governing fencing competitions is translated and adapted from the 1994 French edition published by the FIE and incorporates changes made by the FIE Congresses through 1995. Unless otherwise noted here or in the USFA Operations Manual, these rules apply to fencing competitions in the United States. Two appendices are included with this 1995 edition: Appendix A – The Fencer’s Publicity Code is part of the FIE Rules for Competitions. Appendix B – The FIE has published a number of “Temporary Provisions” concerning competition formats and certain other rules. The complete, updated text is included in Appendix B; notes are also located in the text in appropriate locations. The USFA, Inc. (founded as the Amateur Fencers League of America in 1891) is a not-for-profit, tax-exempt organization primarily engaged in increasing participation in the sport of fencing. Membership in the USFA, in an appropriate category, is open to anyone who has an interest in fencing. The USFA is the official governing body for amateur fencing activities in the United States, and is so recognized by the United States Olympic Committee and the International Fencing Federation (FIE). Accordingly, the authority to enact, amend, and repeal the rules governing amateur fencing in the United States rests solely with the Board of Directors of the USFA. As a matter of policy, the USFA normally follows the technical rules enacted for the sport by the FIE, with occasional minor exceptions that are duly announced.
[Show full text]
La Regla Del Movimiento
La Regla del Movimiento The Rule of the Movement There is not a wound without movement. ~ Carranza A method for practicing and teaching Spanish footwork – Part III By Puck and Mary Curtis August 4, 2006 This is the third in a series of articles on Spanish fencing and builds on the information found in El Círculo y la Cruz and El Primer Fundamento. The following is a work containing both translation and interpretation of primary sources that reflects the authors’ current understanding. The authors welcome critical commentary and peer review. If you have questions or comments, please send them to: [email protected] Advanced Footwork and Exceptions to the Rules Before you attempt any of the footwork described here, you should be comfortable with a general rule of Spanish footwork: Never cross your feet You should be comfortable stepping with the right foot first when moving right and with the left foot first when moving left. When you advance, you should step with the lead foot first, and when you retreat, you should step with rear foot first. All of this should be unconscious and natural. If you still have trouble keeping your feet from crossing when you move, keep practicing and come back to this section later. The worst thing you can do is to change the rules while you are building the foundation of your footwork. Once you can close your eyes, snap your fingers, and recite Don Quixote1 without crossing your feet as you practice the footwork, you can start working on the exceptions. Passing Steps In Romeo and Juliet the character, Mercutio, takes an opportunity to taunt the villain, Tybalt, about a passing step during a duel.
[Show full text]