DOCSLIB.ORG

Rentails Project Notice of Intent

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rentails Project Notice of Intent Rentails Project Notice of Intent Renison Operations September 2017 Revision 1 For EPA Comment Rentails Project, Notice of Intent, Revision 1 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 The Proponent ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Proponent Background ................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Project Name ................................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Project Location ............................................................................................................................. 7 2.3.1 Land Tenure and Title ................................................................................................................. 7 2.4 Legislative Context ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.4.1 Environmental Management Pollution Control Act 1994 (EMPCA) ........................................... 8 2.4.2 Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBCA) ............................ 8 2.4.3 Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 (LUPAA) ................................................................. 9 2.4.4 State Policy on Water Quality Management 1997 (SPWQM) .................................................... 9 2.4.5 Dam Safety Legislation ............................................................................................................... 9 3. Project Description ...................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Overview...................................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Process......................................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Process Inputs ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.4 Process Wastes ............................................................................................................................ 16 3.5 Buildings and Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 17 4. Existing Environment .................................................................................................. 18 4.1 Context ........................................................................................................................................ 18 4.2 Biodiversity .................................................................................................................................. 19 4.3 Climate and Air Quality ............................................................................................................... 20 4.4 Noise ............................................................................................................................................ 20 4.5 Surface and Ground Water.......................................................................................................... 20 4.6 Heritage ....................................................................................................................................... 21 4.7 Dangerous Goods ........................................................................................................................ 21 4.8 Land Use ...................................................................................................................................... 22 4.9 Visual ........................................................................................................................................... 22 4.10 Socio-Economic ......................................................................................................................... 22 4.11 Infrastructure and Off-site Facilities.......................................................................................... 24 5. Potential Environmental Impacts ................................................................................ 25 2 | P a g e Rentails Project, Notice of Intent, Revision 1 5.1 Sources of Contaminants ............................................................................................................ 25 5.2 Contamination Pathways ............................................................................................................ 25 5.3 Potential Receptors ..................................................................................................................... 26 5.4 Key potential environmental impacts ......................................................................................... 26 6. Key Environmental, Social, Health and Economic Issues and Studies ............................ 30 6.1 Key Issues .................................................................................................................................... 30 6.2 Key Studies .................................................................................................................................. 30 6.2.1 Airborne Emissions Study ......................................................................................................... 30 6.2.2 Flora and Fauna Study .............................................................................................................. 31 6.2.3 Solid and Liquid Waste Study ................................................................................................... 32 6.2.4 Water and Stormwater Study .................................................................................................. 32 6.2.5 Socio-Economic Study .............................................................................................................. 32 6.2.6 Mine Closure Planning Study ................................................................................................... 33 6.2.7 Aboriginal and European Heritage Study ................................................................................. 33 7. Further Information ................................................................................................... 34 7.1 Stakeholder Consultation ............................................................................................................ 34 7.2 Project Schedule .......................................................................................................................... 34 8. References ................................................................................................................. 35 9. Appendix 1 – Plant Location Map ................................................................................ 36 10. Appendix 2 – Overall Site Plan ................................................................................... 38 11. Appendix 3 – Plant Site Detail.................................................................................... 40 3 | P a g e Rentails Project, Notice of Intent, Revision 1 1. Executive Summary The Renison Tin Operation (Renison) is the only major tin project in production in Australia and one of the world’s largest underground tin mines. The operation is located at Renison Bell in Western Tasmania and consists of an underground mine, a mineral processing facility and tailings storage facilities (TSF), named A-B Dam, C Dam and a new D Dam currently under construction. The existing Renison mine and processing plant has been operated for approximately 50 years by several owners. Bluestone Mines Tasmania Pty Ltd (BMT) acquired the mine in 2004 and completed refurbishment works before recommencing operations in 2008. In 2009 BMT sold 50% of its ownership of Renison to Yunnan Tin Parksong Australia Holdings Ltd (YTPAH) and established a 50:50 joint venture between BMT and YTPAH (the JV). The Proponent of this Notice of Intent (NoI), Bluestone Mines Tasmania Joint Venture Pty Ltd (BMTJV), manages Renison on behalf of the Joint Venture partners. Renison currently has an underground Ore Reserve sufficient for 8 years of production at current mining rates and over 20 years of Mineral Resource. The BMTJV strategy is to replenish mining depletion from its resource base to maintain an 8-year Ore Reserve, along with continuing to grow the existing resource base. Based upon the long history of operations, the current resource inventory, exploration upside and strong cash flows, the Proponent is confident that Renison will remain a long-life profitable operation. In 2016 work commenced on the construction of a new TSF, named D Dam, providing approximately 6.5 million cubic meters of additional tailings storage capacity, when constructed to its final height, equivalent to 16 years of storage at current production rates. The Proponent proposes the construction and operation of a new tailings retreatment plant at Renison, known as the Rentails (Renison Tailings Retreatment) Project that will operate in tandem with the existing mine and processing plant. The Rentails Project
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West Coast Land Use Planning Strategy
    " " " " " " " " " !"#$%&'(#$%&')*&+,%,(*-%)#"%.,(**+*/%#$0($"/1%" " #".$"23"0%4567% " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Prepared for West Coast Council" " By:" ႛ Integrated Planning Solutions; ႛ Essential Economics; and ႛ Ratio Consultants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
    [Show full text]
  • Water Management in the Anthony–Pieman Hydropower Scheme
    Water management in the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme Pieman Sustainability Review June 2015 FACT SHEET Background The Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme provides a highly valued and reliable source of electricity. The total water storage of the hydropower scheme is 512 gigalitres and the average annual generation is 2367 gigawatt hours. Construction of the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme has resulted in creation of water storages (lakes) and alterations to the natural flow of existing rivers and streams. The Pieman Sustainability Review is a review of operational, social and environmental aspects of the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme that are influenced by Hydro Tasmania. This fact sheet elaborates on water management issues presented in the summary report, available at http://www.hydro.com.au/pieman-sustainability-review Water storage levels in the Anthony–Pieman Water levels have been monitored at these storages since hydropower scheme their creation in stages between 1981 and 1991. The Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme includes eight Headwater storages: Lake Mackintosh and Lake water storages, classified as headwater storages (Lakes Murchison Mackintosh and Murchison), diversion storages (Lakes Lakes Mackintosh and Murchison are the main headwater Henty and Newton and White Spur Pond) and run-of-river storages for the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme. storages (Lakes Rosebery, Plimsoll and Pieman). Lakes The water level fluctuates over the entire operating range Murchison, Henty and Newton and White Spur Pond do not from Normal Minimum Operating Level (NMOL) to Full release water directly to a power station; rather they are Supply Level (FSL) (Figures 1, 2). used to transfer water to other storages within the scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwaters in Wet, Temperate, Mountainous,Sulphide-Mining Districts
    Groundwaters in wet, temperate, mountainous, sulphide-mining districts: delineation of modern fluid flow and predictive modelling for mine closure (Rosebery, Tasmania). by Lee R. Evans B.App.Sci.(Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA September 2009 Cover Image: Elevated orthogonal view of the 3D Rosebery groundwater model grid looking towards the northeast. i Declaration This thesis contains no material that has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of the candidate’s knowledge and beliefs, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis. Three co-authored conference publications written as part of the present study (Evans et al., 2003; Evans et al., 2004a; and Evans et al., 2004b) are provided in Appendix Sixteen. Lee R. Evans Date: This thesis is to be made available for loan or copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1969 from the date this statement was signed. Lee R. Evans Date: ii Abstract There are as yet few studies of the hydrogeology of sulphide-mining districts in wet, temperate, mountainous areas of the world. This is despite the importance of understanding the influence of hydrogeology on the evolution and management of environmental issues such as acid mine drainage (AMD). There is a need to determine whether the special climatic and geological features of such districts result in distinct groundwater behaviours and compositions which need to be considered in mining impact studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro 4 Water Storage
    TERM OF REFERENCE 3: STATE-WIDE WATER STORAGE MANAGEMENT The causes of the floods which were active in Tasmania over the period 4-7 June 2016 including cloud-seeding, State-wide water storage management and debris management. 1 CONTEXT 1.1 Cause of the Floods (a) It is clear that the flooding that affected northern Tasmania (including the Mersey, Forth, Ouse and South Esk rivers) during the relevant period was directly caused by “a persistent and very moist north-easterly airstream” which resulted in “daily [rainfall] totals [that were] unprecedented for any month across several locations in the northern half of Tasmania”, in some cases in excess of 200mm.1 (b) This paper addresses Hydro Tasmania’s water storage management prior to and during the floods. 1.2 Overview (a) In 2014, Tasmania celebrated 100 years of hydro industrialisation and the role it played in the development of Tasmania. Hydro Tasmania believes that understanding the design and purpose of the hydropower infrastructure that was developed to bring electricity and investment to the state is an important starting point to provide context for our submission. The Tasmanian hydropower system design and operation is highly complex and is generally not well understood in the community. We understand that key stakeholder groups are seeking to better understand the role that hydropower operations may have in controlling or contributing to flood events in Tasmania. (b) The hydropower infrastructure in Tasmania was designed and installed for the primary purpose of generating hydro-electricity. Flood mitigation was not a primary objective in the design of Hydro Tasmania’s dams when the schemes were developed, and any flood mitigation benefit is a by-product of their hydro- generation operation.
    [Show full text]
  • EPBC Act Referral
    EPBC Act referral Note: PDF may contain fields not relevant to your application. These fields will appear blank or unticked. Please disregard these fields. Title of proposal 2021/8909 - South Marionoak Tailings Storage Facility, Rosebery, Tasmania Section 1 Summary of your proposed action 1.1 Project industry type Mining 1.2 Provide a detailed description of the proposed action, including all proposed activities The proposed action is the construction and operation of a new Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) at South Marionoak (SMO) in proximity to Rosebery, Tasmania within the West Coast municipality (South Marionoak TSF). The South Marionoak TSF will form part of the MMG Rosebery mine operations and will allow for piping and disposal of tailings resulting from the processing plant. The proposed South Marionoak TSF will provide long term essential tailings storage for the Rosebery Mine. Rosebery Mine has operated continuously since 1936 as an underground polymetallic base metal mine with a capacity to produce up to 1,100,000 tonnes of ore per year. Rosebery produces zinc, copper and lead concentrates, as well as gold ore. The mine has used the Bobadil TSF, situated approximately 2.5 km north of the mine, and 2/5 Dam TSF situated approximately 1 km south of the mine. The TSFs are expected to reach capacity within the next few years, and a new TSF will be required to support the mine’s ongoing operation. The South Marionoak TSF has been designed as an off-stream facility with storage volume of approximately 25 Mm3 and an anticipated lifespan of around 42 years (based on current tailings production rates).
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmania Lake Pieman Project Exploration Licence: El15/2007
    LAKE PIEMAN PROJECT rd ASF RESOURCES EL 15/2007 3 ANNUAL TECHNICAL REPORT JUN. 2010 ASF RESOURCES PTY LTD ABN:24 121 465 405 TASMANIA LAKE PIEMAN PROJECT EXPLORATION LICENCE: EL15/2007 3rd ANNUAL TECHNICALREPORT NO.ASFR 08/10 REPORTING PERIOD: 23/07/2009 TO 22/07/2010 Report prepared by: Mark Derriman 10 September 2010 Copies 1. Department of Mineral Resources, Tasmania 1 copy 2. ASF Resources (Sydney) 1 copy ASF Resources Pty Ltd | Lake Pieman Project 3rd Annual Technical Report 2010 Page - 1 - LAKE PIEMAN PROJECT rd ASF RESOURCES EL 15/2007 3 ANNUAL TECHNICAL REPORT JUN. 2010 Table of Contents EL 152007_201007_main report.pdf LIST OF FIGURES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - 3 - LIST OF TABLES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - 3 - 1. SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - 4 - 2. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................-4- 3. LOCATION AND ACCESS ------------------------------------------------------------- - 4 - 4. TENURE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - 5 - 5. REGIONAL GEOLOGY AND MINERALISATION ------------------------------- - 5 - 5.1 Regional Geology --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 - 5.2 Regional Mineralisation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2019-20 Inland Fisheries Service a Nnual Report 2019-20 GD11611
    INLAND FISHERIES SE Inland Fisheries Service A nnual Report R VICE ANNUAL REPORT 2019-20 2019-20 GD11611 Inland Fisheries Service Tasmania’s newest inland recreational fishery, Camden Dam Undertaking a fishery performance assessment at Curries River Reserviour How to contact us: 17 Back River Road New Norfolk, 7140 Tasmania Ph: 1300INFISH www.ifs.tas.gov.au The Hon Guy Barnett MP Minister for Primary Industries and Water Dear Minister In accordance with the requirements of Section 36 of the State Service Act 2000 and Section 42 of the Financial Management Act 2016, I am pleased to submit the 2019-20 Annual Report of the Inland Fisheries Service for presentation to Parliament. Yours sincerely John Diggle Director of Inland Fisheries 5 October 2020 1 Inland Fisheries Service 1 Annual Report 2019-20 Contents Minister’s Message ................................................................................................................................................ 5 About the Inland Fisheries Service (IFS) ..................................................................................................... 6 Vision .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Mission.................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Our outcomes ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Management Plan for the Mt Read RAP
    Tasmanian Geological Survey Tasmania Record 1997/04 Interim Management Plan for the Mt Read RAP A Co-operatively Formulated Plan by Government Agencies, Statutory Bodies and Relevant Land Users for the Mt Read RAP SUMMARY The formulation of this plan by a co-operative committee, comprising representatives from Government Agencies, statutory bodies and relevant land users, is a ‘first’ for Tasmania. The effort by these various parties with an interest in the Mt Read area demonstrates the commitment to protect the area in the absence of any formal reserve. The Mt Read RAP is almost entirely covered by two current mining leases, ML7M/91 over the Henty gold deposit and ML28M/93 associated with the Rosebery silver-lead-zinc mine, and exploration licence EL5/96 held by Renison Limited. The RAP is within the Mt Read Strategic Prospectivity Zone, which means that if the status of the land is changed and this effectively prevents activities on the current mining tenements, then compensation may be payable. The vegetation around Lake Johnston is acknowledged as having exceptionally high conservation and scientific values, which is why a management plan for the area was written in 1992 and adopted by the lessee. There is a need to expand the scope of the previous plan so that all users of the Mt Read area are aware of the need to abide by measures to protect the vegetation. In addition, media reports have generated much interest in the ancient stands of Huon pine growing in one part of the Mt Read RAP. Studies indicate that the existing Huon pine on the site comprises one or a few individuals which may have vegetatively reproduced on the site since the last glaciation.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Project Pipeline 2020-21
    February 2021 Tasmania’s 10 Year Infrastructure Pipeline Infrastructure Tasmania i Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................................................. i Minister’s message ............................................................................................................................................ ii 1. About the Pipeline ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 What is included in the Pipeline? ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of the Pipeline .................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Infrastructure in the context of COVID-19 ....................................................................................................... 3 3. Analysis of Pipeline trends ............................................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Timing of spend by asset class ........................................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Project driver analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Infrastructure class analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisitions in World Class Mount Read Volcanics Belt Tasmania
    29 January 2017 ACQUISITIONS IN WORLD CLASS MOUNT READ VOLCANICS BELT TASMANIA Highlights: ■ Strategically positioned tenements acquired between world class mines Rosebery (high grade polymetallic, owned by MMG) and Renison Bell Tin Mine (one of the world’s largest and highest grade tin mines, owned 50% by Metals X), and near Mt Lyell Copper Mine. ■ Pre-JORC historical mineralisation estimates for four deposits within the tenements offer a rapid kick start - featuring tin, lead, zinc, copper, silver and nickel. ■ Established access, mining infrastructure, nearby processing facilities and offtake potential within favourable regulatory regime that has supported more than 100 years of mining. ■ The strategic Mt Read Volcanics acquisitions further boost and complement Argent’s position in the Australian base and precious metals space to take advantage of strengthening commodity prices as global growth outperforms most expectations. Argent Minerals Limited (ASX: ARD, Argent, or the Company) is pleased to report strategic acquisitions in the highly productive Mount Read Volcanics belt of Western Tasmania. The Ringville and Queensberry tenements have been granted by the Tasmanian Government to Argent following merit-based assessment processes in which the Company’s proposed exploration plans and capabilities were evaluated in separate competitive bidding environments. About the Ringville tenement position Ringville tenement EL12/2017 is strategically situated between two world class mines – 300 metres west of Mine Lease 28M/1993 containing the Rosebery high grade polymetallic mine owned by MMG Ltd (1208:HK), and immediately to the east of (and partially overlain by) Mine Lease 12M/1995 containing the Renison Bell Tin Mine. The Renison Bell Tin Mine is one of the world’s largest and highest grade tin mines, and is considered to hold more than 85% of Australia’s economic tin resources1.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Table Of
    TASMANIAN ACTS AND STATUTORY RULES TASMANIAN ACTS N – R AND STATUTORY RULES Nation Building and Jobs Plan Facilitation (Tasmania) Act 2009, No. 5 of 2009 (commenced 27 April 2009) Last consolidation: 31 December 2012 (includes changes under the Legislation Publication Act 1996 in force as at 31 December 2012) Amendments commenced in 2009 – 2016: Nation Building and Jobs Plan Facilitation (Tasmania) Act 2009, No. 5 of 2009 (commenced 31 December 2012) – the Act, except Pt. 1 (ss. 1-4) and s. 18 expired 31 December 2012 unless earlier by notice made by the Treasurer National Broadband Network (Tasmania) Act 2010, No. 48 of 2010 (commenced 21 December 2010) Last consolidation: 16 August 2017 (up to and including amendment by the Aboriginal Relics (Consequential Amendments) Act 2017 and changes under the Legislation Publication Act 1996 in force as at 16 August 2017) Amendments commenced in 2017: Building (Consequential Amendments) Act 2016, No. 12 of 2016 (commenced 1 January 2017) – amended s. 28(c) Aboriginal Relics (Consequential Amendments) Act 2017, No. 17 of 2017 (commenced 16 August 2017) – amended s. 28 National Energy Retail Law (Tasmania) Act 2012, No. 11 of 2012 (commenced 1 July 2012, see S.R. 2012, No. 49) Last consolidation: 1 June 2013 (up to and including amendment by the Electricity Reform (Implementation) Act 2013 and changes under the Legislation Publication Act 1996 in force as at 1 June 2013) Amendments commenced in 2012 – 2016: Electricity Reform (Implementation) Act 2013, No. 5 of 2013 (commenced 1 June 2013) – amended ss. 15 and 18; inserted 17A Regulations: National Energy Retail Law (Tasmania) Regulations 2012 (2012/51 amended by 2013/27) National Energy Retail Law (Tasmania) s.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2009/2010
    Mineral Resources Tasmania Annual Review 2009/2010 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Mineral Resources Tasmania Mineral Resources Tasmania Annual Review 2009/2010 Mineral Resources Tasmania PO Box 56 Rosny Park Tasmania 7018 Phone: (03) 6233 8377 Fax: (03) 6233 8338 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.mrt.tas.gov.au Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Mineral Resources Tasmania 2 Cover: 3-D geological model of the area between the River Tamar and Scottsdale Batholith in northeast Tasmania showing the fault architecture, rock units up to the base of the Lower Devonian sandstone, and known gold deposits. Devonian granite is in light pink. Orogenic gold deposition was initiated during SW-directed thrusting and shows control by lithology and lithological contacts. Clusters of deposits in the southeast of the area suggest local control by granite intrusions. Mineral Resources Tasmania Annual Review 2009/2010 3 Contents Summary of activities ······························································ 7 Financial performance ····························································· 10 Review of MRT Branch activities, 2009/2010 ·············································· 12 Metallic Minerals and Geochemistry···················································· 12 Industrial Minerals and Land Management ··············································· 15 Geoscience Information ··························································· 19 Royalty, Finance and Administration ····················································
    [Show full text]