DOCSLIB.ORG

Kakvoća Ugljena Ležišta "Kongora" - Tomislavgrad

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kakvoća Ugljena Ležišta Dr. sc. Stanislav Živković, dipl. ing., dr. se. Jerko Nuić, dij HR9900091 Rudarsko-geološko-naftni fakultet Mr. sc. Dragan Krasić, dipl. ing., Ministarstvo gospodarstva R.H. Zagreb, Hrvatska KAKVOĆA UGLJENA LEŽIŠTA "KONGORA" - TOMISLAVGRAD Sažetak Usvojeni dokumenti u Kvotu, čiji je potpisnik i Republika Hrvatska, obvezuju potpisnice sporazuma na smanjenje emisije opasnih plinova. Potpis Protokola i nastale obveze opterećuju razvitak energetike visokim tehnološkim zahtjevima koji će sve više poskupljivati energiju. Temeljni dio energetskog sustava je termoenergija bazirana na fosilna goriva (u današnje vrijeme manje opasan izvor energije od nuklearne). Opredjeljenja da se u narednim godinama u Hrvatskoj izgradi osnovni termoenergetski sustav otvorio je široku raspravu o izvoru energenta, tj. vrsti fosilnog goriva. Studiozno su razmatrane mogućnosti uvoza plina (Sibir, Alžir), ugljena (Australija, USA, Kolumbija itd.), a zanemareni su resursi u neposrednoj blizini. Velika ležišta ugljena u dalmatinskom zaleđu (BiH) 70 km od mora zaslužuju pažnju stručnjaka i znanstvenika u sagledavanju energetskog potencijala, posebice jer se radi o nisko kaloričnim ugljevima s malo sumpora (ispod 1 posto). Dosadašnje spoznaje su povoljne i ukazuju na energetski potencijal ležišta "Kongora". QUALITY OF COAL IN THE DEPOSIT "KONGORA" - TOMISLAVGRAD Summary The documents accepted in Kyoto, signed by the Republic of Croatia, oblige the signatory countries in view of the Agreement on reducing emissions of noxious gases. These obligations burden the development of the energy sector by high technological requirements which will make energy even more expensive. The basic part of the energy system constitute fossil fuel driven thermal power plants (presently found less hazardous than the nuclear option). The commitment of the Republic of Croatia to build up a basic thermal energy system in the years to come has initiated a series of discussions on energy sources, i. e. on the choice of fossil fuels. Possibilities have been studied as regards the import of gas (Siberia, Algeria), coal (Aus- tralia, the USA, Colombia, etc.), while at the same time neglecting the resources in immediate vicinity. Major coal deposits in the Dalmatian hinterland (Bosnia and Herzegovina), 70 kms from the Adriatic coast, deserve the attention of experts and scientists in surveying energy potentials, particularly as it is a question of the low calorific value coal with scant sulphur (under 1 percent). So far the experiences are favourable and point to the coal deposit "Kongora" as a possible energy potential. 283 UVOD Visoko razvijene zemlje kao glavni zagađivači okoliša, posebice atmosfere, inicirale su dogovore oko smanjenja emisije štetnih plinova, što je rezultiralo potpisom protokola na konferenciji u Kyotu. Potpisani Protokol obvezao je potpisnice da smanje emisiju plina prosječno 5,2 posto u odnosu na 1990 godine. Obveze smanjenja emisije nisu jednake za sve zemlje. Kod visoko razvijenih zemalja smanjenje se kreće u granicama 8-6 posto. Republika Hrvatska preuzela je obvezu smanjenja emisije (stakleničkih) plinova za 5 posto prema referentnoj godini, u periodu od 2008. do 2012. godine. Napomena : Hrvatski državni sabor nije ratificirao potpisani Protokol ali je ratificirana Konvencija o promjeni u kojoj se Hrvatska obavezala zadržati emisiju stakleničkih plinova u 2000. na razini iz 1990. godine. Ovako potpisane obveze rezultat su nametanja od strane visoko razvijenih zemalja. Glavni zagađivači i uzročnici globanog zagađenja, preuzeli su obvezu koju će relativno lako moći sprovesti. Razvoj tehnologije omogućava im da rekonstrukcijama i izgradnjom novih postrojenja izvrše smanjenja emisije plinova i više nego što su obveze preuzete potpisanim protokolom, ne dovodeći u pitanje industrijski i tehnološki razvitak svojih zemalja. Mali zagađivači okoliša s neznatnim emisijama štetnih plinova do 1990 godine u koliko žele napredovati, morat će uložiti enormna sredstva u energetska postrojenja (koja se uglavnom uvoze iz industrijskih razvijenih zemalja) kako bi s malom emisijom plinova (stanje 1990 godine minus 5 posto) omogućio industrijski i tehnološki razvitak uz poštovanje preuzetih obaveza. Republika Hrvatska je od 1990 godine, a i danas zemlja uvoznica "energije" jer ne raspolaže s dovoljnim vlastitim izvorima . Za potrebe Hrvatske u termoelektranama Srbije i B i H proizvodilo se do 1991. prosječno 3,5 milijarde kWh, odnosno emitiralo se 3 500 x 103 kg 3 COr Ukupna emisija Hrvatske elektroprivrede u 1990. bila je 3 749 x IO kg CO2, što znači da je emisija plina bila dvostruko veća. U postupku utvrđivanja emisija Hrvatske u 1990 godini, kao polazna pozicija za provođenje Protokola, ostaje otvoreno kako uključiti emisije CO, za energiju proizvedenu izvan Hrvatske. Jedno od mogućih rješenja je korištenje emisijskog kvantuma koji je BiH emitirala proizvodeći električnu energiju za potrebe Hrvatske. Činjenica postojanja emisije plina u BiH u okviru proizvodnje električne energije za potrebe Hrvatske otvara mogućnost suradnje korištenja energetskog potencijala ležišta " Kongora ". Shvaćajući svu kompleksnost energetskog problema autori ovog rada žele još jednom, osvijetliti i potaknuti znanstvenu i stručnu raspravu o vrijednosti energetskog potencijala dalmatinskog zaleđa. U tom cilju daju se osnovni parametri koji utječu na kakvoću energenta s posebnim osvrtom na ležište lignita "Kongora". 284 OPĆENITO O KORIŠTENJU UGLJENA Sprovedena istraživanja o korištenju prirodnih energetskih resursa pokazuju (World Coal Institute) da sadašnje zastupljenosti energenata kao i predviđanja u doglednoj budućnosti daju prednost ugljenu koji je manje opasan od nuklearne energije, a čije zalihe (prema sadašnjem istraživanju) prelaze količine od 450 bilijuna tona (slika 1.). Slika 1. Zastupljenost energetskih potencijala u proizvodnji električne energije B1995. god. B 2010. god. Ugljen Nafta Plin Nuklearna Povratni energija procesi Kao najveći proizvođači ugljena javljaju se 15 zemalja svijeta (slika 2.) koji su i glavni izvoznici ovog energenta (tablica 1.) Slika 2. Najveći proizvođači ugljena u 1996. godini (Mt) 140CH 1200- 1000- 800- Mt 600- 400- ? 8 200- 5? g § o o „ 2 S S ™ s •§ s s I # s š I i OJ 285 Tablica 1. Države izvoznice ugljena ( 1996.) : :•• iMiliOni i : i:; ;lzvbzriice:. : Milioni t^tona': '.';'••Ugljena za;: i tona; : :koksiranje:; Australija 62,8 Australija 77,6 J. Afrika 54,3 USA 48,0 USA 35„0 Kanada 28,7 Indonezija 33,5 Poljska 8,9 Kolumbija 24,3 Kina 5,6 Kina 23,9 J. Afrika 5,2 Poljska 18,4 FSU 5,1 FSU 16,5 Indonezija 2,9 Kanada 5,7 Kolumbija 0,6 Ostali 14,5 Ostali 7,1 K ;i2?8,9i; ss ;Vvi89,7::::: .{Svjetska proizvodnja ugljena u 1996 god.::,3;70511 Napomena: :FSU - bivši SSSR, 60 posto svijetske proizvodnje troši se na udaljenosti do 50 km od rudnika, a 12 posto se izvozi (1996 god). Od ukupno izvezenog ugljena 60 posto se troši kao energetski ugljen, a 40 posto kao ugljen za koksiranje. Tijekom 1996 godine el.energija dobivena iz ugljena u pojedinim zemljama iznosi: (tablica 2.) Tablica 2. Proizvodnja električne energije iz ugljena : Postotak el. : : :|:: energije iz fil" i::DRŽAVA:; : : ;;•:•-.••; ugljena Poljska 95% J. Afrika 93,% Australija 83% Danska 77% Kina 75% Grčka 69% Njemačka 53% USA 53% £ (za svijet) 40% Razvoj tehnologije izgaranja ugljena u ložištima kotlova i tehnologije otklanjanja štetnih plinova donijele su u zadnjih 10 godina revolucionarna rješenja, tako da se danas veliki broj termoelektrana u najrazvijenijim zemljama rekonstruira ili gasi, a grade se novi blokovi čije su emisije štetnih plinova prihvatljive i za najoštrije ekološke norme. 286 UDIO UGLJENA U STVARANJU ŠTETNIH PLINOVA Neosporno je da toplinska moć ugljena predstavlja osnovni čimbenik kod sagledavanja upotrebe ugljena u gospodarstvene svrhe, pa tako i kao energenta u proizvodnji el. energije. Ništa manje važan čimbenik su i plinovi koji se stvaraju pri izgaranju ugljena. Utjecaj efekta "staklenika" ("greenhouse effect") koji se intenzivno proučava od 1980. godine doveo je do spoznaja da su osnovni uzročnici "staklenika" plinovi u atmosferi ("greenhouse gases", GHGS) ugljični dioksid (CO2),metan (CH4), dušični oksidi (N2O) i najnovije plinovi CFCS, HFCS, PFCS i SFĆ. U stvaranju efekta "staklenika" procentualno učestvuju plinovi prema slici 3. a njihovo izvorište u ugljenu je kao na slici 4. Slika 3. Čimbenici koji utječu na povećanje metana u atmosferi i sastav plinova "staklenika" a.procesi koji utječu na b. sastav plinova " staklenika " nastanak metana u atmosferi Domaće životinje 15.3% 3.3% 7.7% Rudarenje ugljena 6.7% Slika 4. Učešće ugljena u plinovima koji uzrokuju efektat "staklenika" CO2=20% CH4=7% N2O=5% 20% 100% 100% 100% Vrlo su indikativni podatci za razdoblje od 1990. - 1996. godine gdje učešće ugljena u ukupnoj emisiji plina CO2 opada u 15 zemalja EU (slika 5.). Pad proizvodnje ugljena je manji od smanjenja emisije CO2 iz ugljena, što je posljedica rekonstrukcije starih i izgradnje novih termoelektrana na ugljen. 287 Slika 5. Dijagram trenda emisije plina CO, u 15 zemalja EU 120 100 80 / 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1 Drugi bitni čimbenici koji nastaju izgaranjem ugljena su sumporni oksidi (SOX) u kojima je dominantan sumpor dioksid (SO2) uzročnik " kiselih " kiša. Osnovom dobivenih spoznaja u zadnjih 15 godina intenzivno se je radilo na iznalaženju novih tehnologija koje smanjuju štetne efekte izgaranja ugljena. Osnovom poduzetih radnji razvile su se nove tehnologije (Clean Coal Technologies , CCTS) : - tehnologije odsumporavanja (Flue gas desulphurisation - FGD methods)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Bank Document
    23671 <: *h :? ' November 2001 J SIAED6JMEN PRI ES lNfE OATOF B SNI HER EGOVINA Public Disclosure Authorized INA ANT/ ~* EN4/\ AVB4 /\ TNCIA/ ANTON\/A NT ** T RZNgATN / NT \IAN - 4*N EVANTO Public Disclosure Authorized /.SA E NTON H G N A I \ / \_ *: NtRETVA\ tANTOs/ \ / \ / L / C_l /\\ / \ / \ / 29 K I~E *>tE'\STC+NTzONHx,ERZG/VINA X / \ : I L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized / CzNTOSRvJEV F/I\/E COPY Public Disclosure Authorized CANTONS IN THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA UNA - SANA CANTON No. 1 POSAVINA CANTON No. 2 TUZLA CANTON No. 3 ZENICA - DOBOJ CANTON No. 4 DRINA CANTON No. 5 CENTRAL BOSNIAN CANTON No. 6 NERETVA CANTON No. 7 WEST HERZEGOVINA CANTON No. 8 SARAJEVO CANTON No. 9 HERZEG BOSNIAN CANTON No.10 Authors: Miralem Porobic, lawyer and Senada Havic Design: Tirada, Sarajevo. Chris Miller Free publication November 2001 SEED. Sarajevo. Bosnia and Herzegovina This study was done with an aim to determine the level of the actual costs, which must have each small and medium business company when start their operations in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It contains the defined costs for the business registration itself, and for construction of a facility where the registered activity will be performed. The data published in this study were collected through the survey conducted in all municipalities in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina in July 2001. After summarizing all collected data, it was determined that there are few identical forms and approaches to the same category of the costs that a small and medium size business company can have as a precondition for starting its normal work.
    [Show full text]
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
    [Show full text]
  • Monograph Natural-History Heritage of Tomislavgrad
    Monograph Natural-history heritage of Tomislavgrad: An example of promotion, research and protection directions for Duvanjsko and Livanjsko polje Roman Ozimec & Marko Radoš Mara, NGO Naša baština (Our Heritage) The region of Tomislavgrad County covers 969 km2 and belongs partly to the Mediterranean, partly to the Alpine Biogeographical Region. Map by D. Radoš Photo by B. Stumberger 2 big karst poljes: Duvanjsko polje (112 km2) Buško blato, part of Livanjsko polje (405 km²) Smaller karst poljes: Dugo polje (19,1 km²), Roško polje (3,9 km²), Šujičko polje (2,7 km²), Viničko polje (2,2 km²)… 11 mountain massifs: Čvrsnica (2228 m), Vran (2074 m), Cincar (2006 m), Kamešnica (1856 m), Ljubuša (1797 m), Tušnica (1700 m), Jelovača (1527 m), Zavelim (1346 m), Lib (1328 m), Gvozd (1304 m) and Grabovica, with Midena (1224 m). Photo by M. Šumanović 2 lakes: Buško (55,92 km2) and Blidinjsko (up to 6 km2) Main river: Šujica (47,27 km): several small rivers: Drina, Miljacka, Ričina, Seget Hydrologicaly belong to Cetina river system, partly to Jadro, Žrnovnica, Vruja, also Vrljika (Neretva river system) Photo by I. Raič Photo by S.. Budimir Biško The basic idea was to establish an expert team of natural-history researches, who can create a synthesis of all aspects of the natural history heritage for a region, which is in this regard almost unknown. Project leaders: Society Naša baština (Our heritage) from Tomislavgrad (Bosnia and Herzegovina) and Zagreb (Croatia) Started at the end of 2009 and after 3,5 years of work in august 2013, Here is the Monograph on 615 pages and 1218 ilustrations Monograph is result of work: 4 members of editor counsel Robert Jolić, Roman Ozimec, Marko Radoš Mara, Vinko Vukadin 2 chief-editors Roman Ozimec, Marko Radoš Mara 3 reviewers Stipe Čuić (Tomislavgrad) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A,B,C,E A,B,C,E a A,B,C,E A,B,C,E A,B,C,E A,B,C,E A,B,E A,B,E A,B,C,E A,B,E
    POPIS ISPITNIH TIJELA ZA CERTIFIKACIJU SA VAŽEĆIM ODOBRENJIMA (03.06.2018) OPIS POSLOVA PODACI O ISPITNOM KONTAKT TELEFON ZA KOJE ISPITNO ISPITNO TIJELO MJESTU e-mail adresa TIJELO IMA ODOBRENJE Mrkonjić Grad, 050/211-411 a,b,c,e 1 Agro auto d.o.o. Brdo b.b. [email protected] 70.260 Gradiška, a,b,c,e 2 Auto centar Alfa d.o.o. Dejtonska b.b. 051/825-997 [email protected] 78.400 Posušje, 039/682-900 a 3 Auto-Inđilović d.o.o. Rastovačko polje b.b. [email protected] 88240 Doboj, 053-241-967 a,b,c,e 4 Autokomerc a.d. Ul. Nikole Pašića 5 [email protected] 74.000 Šamac, 054/612-435 Put Srpskih a,b,c,e 5 Autoservis A.D. [email protected] dobrovoljaca 8 [email protected] 76.230 Ilidža, 033/777-102 BIHAMK- Tehnički Blažujski drum 78 6 [email protected] pregledi i servisi d.o.o. 71210 a,b,c,e Brčko, 049-217-081 a,b,c,e 7 Braco i sinovi d.o.o. Banjalučka 54 [email protected] 76000 049/220-000 Brčko, a,b,e 490-106 za M1,N1,O1,O2,L kategoriju 8 Brčko Gas d.o.o. Banjalučka 8 [email protected] ODUZETO 76.000 ODOBRENJE ZA „C“ Rogatica, Conte-co d.o.o. i AMD 058/415-309 a,b,e 9 Pionirska 13 Rogatica [email protected] 73.220 Ljubuški, Crotehna d.o.o. 039/839-531 a,b,c,e 10 Nikole Kordića b.b. Ljubuški [email protected] 88.320 Tomislavgrad Crotehna d.o.o.
    [Show full text]
  • Popis Odobrenih Programa I Projekata Iz Područja
    POPIS ODOBRENIH PROGRAMA I PROJEKATA IZ PODRUČJA KULTURE U 2011. GODINI ODOBRENI NAZIV INSTITUCIJE MJESTO NAZIV PROGRAMA IZNOS (kn) Redni broj Bratovština sv. Nikole Izgradnja i opremanje 1 Mostar 30.000,00 Tavelića, Buna, Mostar kulturnog središta Uređenje doma kulture u 2 Centar za kulturu Orašje Orašje 70.000,00 Orašju 3 Centar za kulturu, Odžak Odžak Uređenje Centra 50.000,00 Društvo hrvatskih književnika 4 Mostar Izdavanje časopisa Osvit 40.000,00 Herceg Bosne, Mostar Društvo za digitalizaciju Prezentacija tradicijske 5 tradicijske kulturne baštine, Široki Brijeg 25.000,00 baštine Široki Brijeg Družba sestara milosrdnica 6 Tomislavgrad Sanacija samostana 100.000,00 sv. Vinka, Tomislavgrad Franjevačka udruga Masna 7 Posušje Dogradnja samostana 50.000,00 Luka, Rakitno, Posušje Franjevački muzej i galerija 8 Livno Stalni postav sakralne zbirke 100.000,00 Gorica Franjevački samostan Duha 9 Fojnica Stalni muzejski postav 120.000,00 Svetoga Fojnica Franjevački samostan Duha 10 Fojnica Restauratorski radovi u crkvi 50.000,00 Svetoga, Fojnica 1 ODOBRENI NAZIV INSTITUCIJE MJESTO NAZIV PROGRAMA IZNOS (kn) Redni broj Franjevački samostan Guča 11 Guča Gora Zaštita spomeničke građe 50.000,00 Gora Franjevački samostan 12 Banja Luka Obnova porušene crkve 80.000,00 Petrićevac, Banja Luka Franjevački samostan sv. Dovršetak obnove 13 Konjic 100.000,00 Ivana Krstitelja, Konjic samostana Franjevački samostan sv. Kraljeva 14 Ivana Krstitelja, Kraljeva Zaštita matičnih knjiga 80.000,00 Sutjeska Sutjeska Franjevački samostan sv. 15 Jajce Sanacija muzeja
    [Show full text]
  • The Situation in Canton 10
    The Situation in Canton 10 Today representatives of the international community, namely OHR, OSCE, UNMIBH, UNHCR, EU and SFOR held a meeting in Livno and discussed issues related to Canton 10. With concern they noted the very critical situation in this Canton and can no longer tolerate a continuation of the present condition. They also noted that officials of this Canton have so far refuted such conclusions and appealed to the IC to talk with “language of argumentation”. Four and a half years of the IC discussions with the local officials on the implementation of Dayton have failed. The IC hereby points out the most blatant violations of agreements and Human Rights which exist Canton 10. Absence of Rule of Law In Canton 10, there has been no single satisfactory prosecution of a violent crime against a minority. The total disregard for the Rule of Law – a cornerstone in any civilised democracy dedicated to the principle of separation of Powers among the Legislative, the Executive and the Judiciary – is a major concern. Basic aspects of this concept do not function or do not exist. The audit of the Livno Prosecutor’s Office in 1999 by UNMIBH’s Judical Systems Assistance Program (JSAP) revealed that, “the criminal justice system has consistently failed to apply fundamental judicial principles”. There is no effective prosecutorial service in the Canton. The hand of politics is very actively apparent in judicial processes in Canton 10. Moreover, the police have consistently failed to conduct professional investigations in the cases of: Series of attacks on minority properties in Livno and Tomislavgrad in 1997; Arson at the Serb Orthodox Monastery in Glamoc in 1998; Riot and double murder in Drvar in April 1998; Destruction of UNHCR reconstructed home in Kablici in 1999; Violent attacks on elderly Serbs in Drvar in 1999; Alleged rape in Drvar in 1999; Explosion at Bosniak-owned café in Livno in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Permits for the Construction of South Interconnection Gas Pipeline
    USAID Energy Investment Activity Project (EIA) List of Permits for the Construction of South Interconnection Gas Pipeline UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Energy Investment Activity (USAID EIA) Contract Number AID-168-C-14-00002 List of Permits for the Construction of South Interconnection Gas Pipeline Author: EIA Project Team November, 2018 Implemented by: Advanced Engineering Associates International, Inc. (AEAI) USAID COR: Ankica Gavrilovic This Document is made possible by support from the American People sponsored by United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this Document were prepared by and are the sole responsibility of Advanced Engineering Associates International, Inc., and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Contract Number AID-168-C-14-00002 1 USAID Energy Investment Activity Project (EIA) List of Permits for the Construction of South Interconnection Gas Pipeline SCOPING– LIST OF PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERCONNECTION 1. Introduction This document contains a list of permits, approvals and other documents to be issued by various competent authorities in the process of obtaining the required permits (Urban Permit, Construction Permit and Use Permit) for construction and operation of the South Interconnection Gas Pipeline. The purpose of this list is to serve as a basis for interviews with representatives of competent authorities that will be conducted for the purpose of mapping the upcoming permitting procedure (scoping). The list will be finalized after the exact pipeline route and other project parameters are specified. This document can be used as a guideline through the permitting procedure in order to ensure the efficient planning of the all permitting steps.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Impacts of Emigration
    On behalf of the European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Social Impact of Emigration and Rural-Urban Migration in Central and Eastern Europe Final Country Report Bosnia and Herzegovina April 2012 Authors: Zehra Kačapor-Džihić Nermin Oruč Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission may be held responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this publication. Social Impact of Emigration and Rural-Urban Migration in Central and Eastern Europe VT/2010/001 Table of Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................. 4 1. Socio-Economic and Political Overview ..................................................................... 5 2. Main emigration and internal migration trends and patterns ....................................... 6 2.1. Main emigration trends ............................................................................................ 6 2.1.1. Conflict-induced emigration in the period 1992-1995 ........................................... 7 2.1.2. Post-war return migration ..................................................................................... 7 2.1.3. Voluntary migration of the 21st Century ................................................................ 7 2.1.4. Data on the stock of migrants and main destinations ........................................... 8 2.2. Main internal migration trends................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Essay Competition “Tackling Youth Unemployment in Bosnia and Herzegovina: My Generation's View” List of All Particip
    Youth Essay Competition “Tackling Youth Unemployment in Bosnia and Herzegovina: My Generation’s View” List of All Participants of the Competition Names 1. Admir Čavalić, Tuzla 2. Admir Karadža, Bugojno 3. Admira Tahirović, Sarajevo 4. Adnan Muminović, Sarajevo 5. Aida Mujezinović, Tešanj 6. Aida Sadagić, Sarajevo 7. Ajdin Čagalj, Sarajevo 8. Ajdin Perčo, Sarajevo 9. Ajka Baručić and Lejla Ahmetagić, Tuzla 10. Ajla Kurspahić, Sarajevo 11. Alaudina Boškailo, Čapljina 12. Albinko Hasić 13. Aleksandar Crnovčić, Banja Luka 14. Aleksandar Jovanović, Ugljevik 15. Aleksandra Gojić, Doboj 16. Alen Džananović, Sarajevo 17. Alija Bajramović, Sarajevo 18. Amela Habibić, Turbe 19. Amila Biogradlija, Zenica 20. Amila Pozderac, Bihać 21. Amra Kandić 22. Anamarija Ljubić, Široki Brijeg 23. Anela Zorlak, Goražde 24. Anesa Omanović, Sarajevo 25. Arslan Berbić, Tuzla 26. Azra Aljkanović, Sarajevo 27. Belmin Selimbegović, Sarajevo 28. Berina Kapetanović, Sarajevo 29. Berina Porča, Sarajevo 30. Biljana Popović, Banja Luka 31. Boban Sašić, Kneževo 32. Boris Drobić, Brčko 33. Boris Lalić, Sarajevo 34. Boriša Stevanović, Bijeljina 35. Branko Vasiljević, Banja Luka 36. Damir Kurtagić, Sarajevo 37. Dario Milić 38. Divna Kosović, Mostar 39. Dragana Krcum, Mostar 40. Dragana Marinković, Budapest, Hungary 41. Dragana Pavlović, Bijeljina 42. Elvira Ganibegović 43. Dženita Hukić, Sarajevo 44. Ediba Softić, Tuzla 45. Edin Pašović, Sarajevo 46. Edvin Sinanović, Zavidovići 47. Elma Cuprija, Visoko 48. Ema Mustafić, Bihać 49. Emil Ahmagić, Sarajevo 50. Emina Čamdžić, Sarajevo 51. Emina Rekanović, Sarajevo 52. Emina Vranić, Sarajevo 53. Emir Šabanić, Sarajevo 54. Ena Muratspahić, Sarajevo 55. Enes Tinjić, Tuzla 56. Evelin Trako, Sarajevo 57. Fahira Brodlija, Sarajevo 58. Fatima Muhamedagić, Pećigrad 59. Haris Softić, Tuzla 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Dr. Srebren Dizdar University of Sarajevo Situation Analysis Of
    Prof. Dr. Srebren Dizdar University of Sarajevo Situation Analysis of Educational Services for Children in Bosnia and Herzegovina (A Study Commissioned by the UNICEF Office in Bosnia and Herzegovina) Sarajevo, November 1996 Prof. Dr. Srebren Dizdar Situation Analysis of Educational Services for Children in Bosnia- Herzegovina Situation Analysis of Educational Services for Children in Bosnia and Herzegovina 1. The situation of the system before the 1992-1995 war 1.0. Historical overview 1.1. Beginnings of public education system: the Austro- Hungarian period The tradition of public education under the auspices of government (i.e. state-controlled) in Bosnia and Herzegovina has had its origin in the times of the Austro-Hungarian rule in these parts, in the period commencing after 1878 and ending in 1918. In the previous time, the education was almost exclusively restricted to the religious communities and the types of schools they had offered included a rather limited number of pupils. Certain attempts towards modernization of education by the failing Ottoman government in Bosnia in 1860s by the Governor (vali) Topal Osman Pasha could not be seen as the systematic introduction to the system of public education. Nevertheless, the process of growing self- identification of the four major religious communities in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Islamic, Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Jewish) in the course of 19th century affected their self-awareness as future nations-in- making (Bosniaks /Bosnian Moslems/, /Bosnian/ Serbs, /Bosnian/ Croats and Jews, respectively). The call for religious, cultural and educational autonomy in all these communities was equalized with their different political ambitions and goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Divided Sarajevo: Space Management, Urban Landscape and Spatial Practices Across the Boundary Bassi, Elena
    www.ssoar.info Divided Sarajevo: space management, urban landscape and spatial practices across the boundary Bassi, Elena Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Bassi, E. (2015). Divided Sarajevo: space management, urban landscape and spatial practices across the boundary. Europa Regional, 22.2014(3-4), 101-113. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-461616 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use. anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.
    [Show full text]
  • National Assessment of Biodiversity Information Management and Reporting Baseline for Bosnia and Herzegovina
    NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING BASELINE FOR BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Published by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Registered offices Bonn and Eschborn, Germany Open Regional Fund for South-East Europe – Biodiversity (ORF-BD) GIZ Country Office in Bosnia and Herzegovina Zmaja od Bosne 7-7a, Importanne Centar 03/VI 71 000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina T +387 33 957 500 F +387 33 957 501 [email protected] www.giz.de As at May 2017 Printed by Agencija ALIGO o.r. Cover page design GIZ ORF-BD / Igor Zdravkovic Prepared by Exatto d.o.o. za informacijske tehnologije GIZ ORF-BD team in charge BIMR Project Manager / Coordinator for Montenegro Jelena Perunicic ([email protected]) BIMR Project Manager / Coordinator for Bosnia and Herzegovina Azra Velagic-Hajrudinovic ([email protected]) Text dr. Gabor Mesaros Reviewed and endorsed by BIMR Regional Platform South-East Europe GIZ is responsible for the content of this publication. On behalf of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) Abbreviations ASCI - Areas of Special Conservation Interest BD - Brcko District BiH - Bosnia and Herzegovina BIMR - Biodiversity Information System Management and Reporting CBD - Convention on Biological Diversity/Biodiversity CHM - Clearing House Mechanism CITES - Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species EAS - Environmental Approximation Strategy EEA - European Environmental Agency EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EIONET
    [Show full text]