Popis Odobrenih Programa I Projekata Iz Područja
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
World Bank Document
23671 <: *h :? ' November 2001 J SIAED6JMEN PRI ES lNfE OATOF B SNI HER EGOVINA Public Disclosure Authorized INA ANT/ ~* EN4/\ AVB4 /\ TNCIA/ ANTON\/A NT ** T RZNgATN / NT \IAN - 4*N EVANTO Public Disclosure Authorized /.SA E NTON H G N A I \ / \_ *: NtRETVA\ tANTOs/ \ / \ / L / C_l /\\ / \ / \ / 29 K I~E *>tE'\STC+NTzONHx,ERZG/VINA X / \ : I L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized / CzNTOSRvJEV F/I\/E COPY Public Disclosure Authorized CANTONS IN THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA UNA - SANA CANTON No. 1 POSAVINA CANTON No. 2 TUZLA CANTON No. 3 ZENICA - DOBOJ CANTON No. 4 DRINA CANTON No. 5 CENTRAL BOSNIAN CANTON No. 6 NERETVA CANTON No. 7 WEST HERZEGOVINA CANTON No. 8 SARAJEVO CANTON No. 9 HERZEG BOSNIAN CANTON No.10 Authors: Miralem Porobic, lawyer and Senada Havic Design: Tirada, Sarajevo. Chris Miller Free publication November 2001 SEED. Sarajevo. Bosnia and Herzegovina This study was done with an aim to determine the level of the actual costs, which must have each small and medium business company when start their operations in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It contains the defined costs for the business registration itself, and for construction of a facility where the registered activity will be performed. The data published in this study were collected through the survey conducted in all municipalities in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina in July 2001. After summarizing all collected data, it was determined that there are few identical forms and approaches to the same category of the costs that a small and medium size business company can have as a precondition for starting its normal work. -
No Slide Title
Operation Performance Evaluation Review Environmental Analysis & Audit and Assistance with Restructuring - Regional Railway - Bosnia and Herzegovina (Public Sector Technical Cooperation Operations) September 2009 ab0cd OPERATION PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW (OPER) PREFACE This Evaluation Report The subject of this Operation Performance Evaluation Review (OPER) are the public sector Technical Cooperation (TC) operations “Environmental Analysis & Audit” and “Assistance with Restructuring”, which involved, on commitment basis, a funding of €30,000 and €300,000, respectively. The funding was provided under the Italian Central European Initiative (CEI) facility as part of the Bank’s Technical Cooperation Funds Programme (TCFP). The TCs were meant to facilitate the Bank’s loan “Bosnia and Herzegovina: Regional Railway Project” (BDS05-175), the Bank’s second loan in this transport sub-sector in the country. The OPER has been executed by Wolfgang Gruber, Senior Evaluation Manager. Josip Polic, Principal Banker of the Resident Office (RO) in Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina) prepared the self-evaluation (TC) Project Completion Report (PCR) for the second TC; a PCR for the first-mentioned TC is not available. The operation team and other relevant Bank staff commented on an early draft of this report. The Basic Data Sheet on page [iii] of this report and the PCR in Appendix 4 are complementary to this OPER and designed to be read together. Information on the TC operations was obtained from relevant teams and departments of the Bank and its files as well as from external sector and industry sources. Fieldwork was carried out in June 2009. Appendix 1 presents a list of contacts. EvD would like to take this opportunity to thank those who contributed to the production of this report. -
Reunifying Mostar: Opportunities for Progress
REUNIFYING MOSTAR: OPPORTUNITIES FOR PROGRESS 19 April 2000 ICG Balkans Report N° 90 Sarajevo/Washington/Brussels, 19 April 2000 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................i I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................1 A. HDZ Obstruction...................................................................................................2 B. International Community Disarray..........................................................................3 II. BROKEN PROMISES: 1994-1999 .........................................................................4 A. The 1994 Geneva MOU .........................................................................................4 B. Towards Ethnic Apartheid......................................................................................4 C. EU Aid Reinforces Ethnic Apartheid ........................................................................6 D. Madrid and Dayton: defining the local administration of Mostar ................................7 E. Koschnick’s Decree and the Rome Agreement: EU Caves in to the HDZ.....................9 F. Mostar’s First Elections and the Myth of the Interim Statute ...................................12 G. The Liska Street Incident and Unified Police..........................................................18 H. No Progress, New Elections .................................................................................24 I. No progress, -
STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the -
Monograph Natural-History Heritage of Tomislavgrad
Monograph Natural-history heritage of Tomislavgrad: An example of promotion, research and protection directions for Duvanjsko and Livanjsko polje Roman Ozimec & Marko Radoš Mara, NGO Naša baština (Our Heritage) The region of Tomislavgrad County covers 969 km2 and belongs partly to the Mediterranean, partly to the Alpine Biogeographical Region. Map by D. Radoš Photo by B. Stumberger 2 big karst poljes: Duvanjsko polje (112 km2) Buško blato, part of Livanjsko polje (405 km²) Smaller karst poljes: Dugo polje (19,1 km²), Roško polje (3,9 km²), Šujičko polje (2,7 km²), Viničko polje (2,2 km²)… 11 mountain massifs: Čvrsnica (2228 m), Vran (2074 m), Cincar (2006 m), Kamešnica (1856 m), Ljubuša (1797 m), Tušnica (1700 m), Jelovača (1527 m), Zavelim (1346 m), Lib (1328 m), Gvozd (1304 m) and Grabovica, with Midena (1224 m). Photo by M. Šumanović 2 lakes: Buško (55,92 km2) and Blidinjsko (up to 6 km2) Main river: Šujica (47,27 km): several small rivers: Drina, Miljacka, Ričina, Seget Hydrologicaly belong to Cetina river system, partly to Jadro, Žrnovnica, Vruja, also Vrljika (Neretva river system) Photo by I. Raič Photo by S.. Budimir Biško The basic idea was to establish an expert team of natural-history researches, who can create a synthesis of all aspects of the natural history heritage for a region, which is in this regard almost unknown. Project leaders: Society Naša baština (Our heritage) from Tomislavgrad (Bosnia and Herzegovina) and Zagreb (Croatia) Started at the end of 2009 and after 3,5 years of work in august 2013, Here is the Monograph on 615 pages and 1218 ilustrations Monograph is result of work: 4 members of editor counsel Robert Jolić, Roman Ozimec, Marko Radoš Mara, Vinko Vukadin 2 chief-editors Roman Ozimec, Marko Radoš Mara 3 reviewers Stipe Čuić (Tomislavgrad) Dr. -
Bankruptcy Law: Testing of Model Solutions
Bankruptcy Law: Testing of Model Solutions Contract Number PCE-I-00-98-00015-00 TO 821 Submitted to: U.S. Agency for International Development Submitted by: Chemonics International Inc. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Emerging Markets Ltd. National Center for State Courts June 30, 2005 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development of the United States Government. USAID FILE Testing of Model Solutions Chemonics International Inc. June 30, 2005 This report summarizes major issues raised by FILE’s key stakeholders (Judges, Trustees, debtors, creditors, investors, experts, and other parties active in bankruptcy proceedings) during the bankruptcy team’s work on pilot cases and/or other bankruptcy intervention cases. This report should be read in conjunction with the Report on Hypothetical Solution Models prepared by FILE and delivered to USAID on May 31, 2005 (the “May Report”), which describes the most common situations in bankruptcy in detail and offers model solutions, applying both theoretical and practical knowledge and experience of the Federation and RS bankruptcy laws (collectively, the “Bankruptcy Law”). The majority of the issues described and solutions identified arose through pilot case activities or other bankruptcy cases in which FILE has intervened. The basic grounds for testing all solution -
Decentralised Co-Operation a New Tool for Conflict Situations
DECENTRALISED CO-OPERATION A NEW TOOL FOR CONFLICT SITUATIONS The experience of WHO in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a case study Ambrogio Manenti WHO Consultant WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION Regional Office for Europe Partnership in Health and Emergency Assistance “Are you fatalist, pessimist or existentialist ?” “Actually I am pharmacist” Toto’ Acknowledgements A hundred people have been working in the activities of Decentralised Co-operation throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina together with WHO. I wish to express my gratitude to all of them for their efforts, enthusiasm, and support. I would especially like to thank Dr. Renzo Bonn and Mr. Gianguido Palumbo. © World Health Organization – 1999 Keywords All rights in this document are reserved by the WHO Regional Office for Europe. The document may nevertheless be freely reviewed, abstracted, reproduced or translated · WAR into any other language (but not for sale or for use in conjunction with commercial · RELIEF WORK - case studies purposes) provided that full acknowledgement is given to the source. For the use of the · INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION WHO emblem, permission must be sought from the WHO Regional Office. Any · DECENTRALIZATION translation should include the words: The translator of this document is responsible for · COMMUNITY NETWORKS the accuracy of the translation. The Regional Office would appreciate receiving three · HUMAN DEVELOPMENT copies of any translation. Any views expressed by named authors are solely the · MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES responsibility of those authors. · HEALTH PLANNING -
1 Title: Support to Local and Regional Development In
1 TITLE: SUPPORT TO LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Abstract: the abstract for paper no. 57 NAME: JASMINA OSMANAGIĆ, PHD Faculty of Economics, Sarajevo 71000 Sarajevo Phone: +387 33 27 59 19 E-mail: [email protected] Mirko Pejanović, PhD FPN University of Sarajevo 71000 Sarajevo Tel: 387 61 29 58 59 Klelija Balta UNDP 71000 Sarajevo Tel: 387 61 10 42 20 2 SUPPORT TO LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN BOSNIA AND ABSTRACT The paper is a review European Commission support for local and regional development in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1999 to 2006. In focus are The Quick Impact Facility Project Phase I (QIF 1) 1999-2002, European Union- Quick Impact Facility Project Phase II (EUQIF II) 2002-2004, European Union support for Regional Economic Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Phase I (EU RED I) 2004-2005 and Europe Union support for Regional Economic Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Phase II (EU RED II) 2005-2007). The paper contents background information, previous assistance, other related programmes, European Commission funded projects, non European Commission funded projects, definition on participants, target groups or beneficiaries, employed domicile populations, start situation, objectives, scope of work, methodology and approach, transparency, visibility, expected outputs and indicators, funds or budget, reporting, monitoring and evaluation. The paper presents knowledge transfer about local and regional theories and policies from experts European Commission to local experts. The paper shows funds. (Regional Development in Tuzla 1.2 Million Euro, Regional Development in Brcko 1.0 Million Euro, Mostar Economic Development 500.000 Euro, Sarajevo Economic Region 200.000 Euro, Quick Impact Facility 5.5 Million Euro, Foreign 3 Investment Promotion 1.0 Million Euro, European Fund 55 Million Euro, specific activities 3,200.000 Euro and Project Fund 3,800.000 Euro, EUQIF II about 3 Million Euro, etc) and benefits for EU and B&H. -
A,B,C,E A,B,C,E a A,B,C,E A,B,C,E A,B,C,E A,B,C,E A,B,E A,B,E A,B,C,E A,B,E
POPIS ISPITNIH TIJELA ZA CERTIFIKACIJU SA VAŽEĆIM ODOBRENJIMA (03.06.2018) OPIS POSLOVA PODACI O ISPITNOM KONTAKT TELEFON ZA KOJE ISPITNO ISPITNO TIJELO MJESTU e-mail adresa TIJELO IMA ODOBRENJE Mrkonjić Grad, 050/211-411 a,b,c,e 1 Agro auto d.o.o. Brdo b.b. [email protected] 70.260 Gradiška, a,b,c,e 2 Auto centar Alfa d.o.o. Dejtonska b.b. 051/825-997 [email protected] 78.400 Posušje, 039/682-900 a 3 Auto-Inđilović d.o.o. Rastovačko polje b.b. [email protected] 88240 Doboj, 053-241-967 a,b,c,e 4 Autokomerc a.d. Ul. Nikole Pašića 5 [email protected] 74.000 Šamac, 054/612-435 Put Srpskih a,b,c,e 5 Autoservis A.D. [email protected] dobrovoljaca 8 [email protected] 76.230 Ilidža, 033/777-102 BIHAMK- Tehnički Blažujski drum 78 6 [email protected] pregledi i servisi d.o.o. 71210 a,b,c,e Brčko, 049-217-081 a,b,c,e 7 Braco i sinovi d.o.o. Banjalučka 54 [email protected] 76000 049/220-000 Brčko, a,b,e 490-106 za M1,N1,O1,O2,L kategoriju 8 Brčko Gas d.o.o. Banjalučka 8 [email protected] ODUZETO 76.000 ODOBRENJE ZA „C“ Rogatica, Conte-co d.o.o. i AMD 058/415-309 a,b,e 9 Pionirska 13 Rogatica [email protected] 73.220 Ljubuški, Crotehna d.o.o. 039/839-531 a,b,c,e 10 Nikole Kordića b.b. Ljubuški [email protected] 88.320 Tomislavgrad Crotehna d.o.o. -
Croatia Atlas
FICSS in DOS Croatia Atlas Map Field Information and Coordination Support Section As of April 2007 Division of Operational Services Email : [email protected] ((( ((( Kiskunfél(((egyháza ((( Harta ((( ((( ((( Völkermarkt ((( Murska Sobota ((( Szentes ((( ((( ((( Tamási ((( ((( ((( Villach !! Klagenfurt ((( Pesnica ((( Paks Kiskörös ((( ((( ((( Davograd ((( Marcali ((( !! ((( OrOOrorr ss!! MariborMaribor ((( Szank OOrrr ((( ((( ((( Kalocsa((( Kecel ((( Mindszent ((( Mursko Sredisce ((( Kiskunmajsa ((( ((( ((( ((( NagykanizsaNagykanizsa ((( ((( Jesenice ProsenjakovciProsenjakovci( (( CentreCentre NagykanizsaNagykanizsa ((( ((( ((( ProsenjakovciProsenjakovci( (( CentreCentre ((( KiskunhalasKiskunhalas((( ((( ((( ((( ((( ((( KiskunhalasKiskunhalas Hódmezövásár((( h ((( ((( Tolmezzo ((( ((( ((( ((( ((( ((( ((( Sostanj Cakovec ((( ((( ((( ((( ((( Dombóvár ((( ((( ((( ((( Kaposvár ((( Forraaskut((( VinicaVinica ((( Szekszárd VinicaVinica (( ((( ((( ((( ((( SLOVENIASLOVENIA ((( ((( ((( ((( Jánoshalma ((( SLOVENIASLOVENIA ((( SLOVENIASLOVENIA ((( SLOVENIASLOVENIA Legrad ((( ((( SLOVENIASLOVENIA ((( ((( SLOVENIASLOVENIA ((( SLOVENIASLOVENIA Ruzsa ((( SLOVENIASLOVENIA ((( ((( Csurgó !! ((( ((( !! ((( ((( ((( ((( CeljeCeljeCelje ((( ((( Nagyatád HUNGARYHUNGARY ss ((( ((( HUNGARYHUNGARY ((( ss ((( HUNGARYHUNGARY ((( ss ((( CeljeCelje HUNGARYHUNGARY ((( ss ((( HUNGARY HUNGARYHUNGARY ((( ss ((( HUNGARYHUNGARY ((( Kamnik ss CeljeCelje HUNGARYHUNGARY ((( Ivanec VarazdinVarazdin ((( ((( VarazdinVarazdin ((( Szoreg Makó ((( ((( ((( ((( ((( ((( ((( ((( -
The Situation in Canton 10
The Situation in Canton 10 Today representatives of the international community, namely OHR, OSCE, UNMIBH, UNHCR, EU and SFOR held a meeting in Livno and discussed issues related to Canton 10. With concern they noted the very critical situation in this Canton and can no longer tolerate a continuation of the present condition. They also noted that officials of this Canton have so far refuted such conclusions and appealed to the IC to talk with “language of argumentation”. Four and a half years of the IC discussions with the local officials on the implementation of Dayton have failed. The IC hereby points out the most blatant violations of agreements and Human Rights which exist Canton 10. Absence of Rule of Law In Canton 10, there has been no single satisfactory prosecution of a violent crime against a minority. The total disregard for the Rule of Law – a cornerstone in any civilised democracy dedicated to the principle of separation of Powers among the Legislative, the Executive and the Judiciary – is a major concern. Basic aspects of this concept do not function or do not exist. The audit of the Livno Prosecutor’s Office in 1999 by UNMIBH’s Judical Systems Assistance Program (JSAP) revealed that, “the criminal justice system has consistently failed to apply fundamental judicial principles”. There is no effective prosecutorial service in the Canton. The hand of politics is very actively apparent in judicial processes in Canton 10. Moreover, the police have consistently failed to conduct professional investigations in the cases of: Series of attacks on minority properties in Livno and Tomislavgrad in 1997; Arson at the Serb Orthodox Monastery in Glamoc in 1998; Riot and double murder in Drvar in April 1998; Destruction of UNHCR reconstructed home in Kablici in 1999; Violent attacks on elderly Serbs in Drvar in 1999; Alleged rape in Drvar in 1999; Explosion at Bosniak-owned café in Livno in 2000. -
List of Permits for the Construction of South Interconnection Gas Pipeline
USAID Energy Investment Activity Project (EIA) List of Permits for the Construction of South Interconnection Gas Pipeline UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Energy Investment Activity (USAID EIA) Contract Number AID-168-C-14-00002 List of Permits for the Construction of South Interconnection Gas Pipeline Author: EIA Project Team November, 2018 Implemented by: Advanced Engineering Associates International, Inc. (AEAI) USAID COR: Ankica Gavrilovic This Document is made possible by support from the American People sponsored by United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this Document were prepared by and are the sole responsibility of Advanced Engineering Associates International, Inc., and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Contract Number AID-168-C-14-00002 1 USAID Energy Investment Activity Project (EIA) List of Permits for the Construction of South Interconnection Gas Pipeline SCOPING– LIST OF PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERCONNECTION 1. Introduction This document contains a list of permits, approvals and other documents to be issued by various competent authorities in the process of obtaining the required permits (Urban Permit, Construction Permit and Use Permit) for construction and operation of the South Interconnection Gas Pipeline. The purpose of this list is to serve as a basis for interviews with representatives of competent authorities that will be conducted for the purpose of mapping the upcoming permitting procedure (scoping). The list will be finalized after the exact pipeline route and other project parameters are specified. This document can be used as a guideline through the permitting procedure in order to ensure the efficient planning of the all permitting steps.