Lily of the Valley.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Plant Profile Picture or Drawing Botanical Name: Liliaceae Convallaria majalis Common Name: Lily Of The Valley FAMILY NAME: Asparagaceae Species and cultivars of special interest: Species: Convallaria majalis var. keiskei, C. majalis var. majalis, C. majalis var. Montana Cultivars: C. majalis 'Albostriata', C. majalis 'Green Tapestry', 'Haldon Grange', 'Hardwick Hall', 'Hofheim', 'Marcel', 'Variegata’, 'Vic Pawlowski's Gold', C. majalis 'Berlin Photo from Google Giant', C. majalis 'Géant de Fortin' (syn. 'Fortin's Giant'), C. majalis 'Flore Pleno', C. majalis 'Rosea' Origin: Forests of Europe and North America Availability: Spring (late September to mid October) Foliage Characteristics: --- Stems grow up to 25cm long --- Flowering stems bear two smooth, elliptical green leaves which are herbaceous --- Flowering stems have a raceme of 5 to 15 flowers --- Floral Characteristics: --- Flowers have six petals that form a bell---shape --- Flowers available in white and pale pink --- Bears red berries that dry translucent Special features and characteristics of special interest: --- Sweet scented --- Highly poisonous --- Traditionally used in weddings – symbolises a return of happiness --- Used as a herbal remedy Maintenance, Cultural requirements and Post Harvest Treatments: --- Harvest when the first bell has lost it’s deep green colour and has turned white --- Re---cut stems 2cm from the end, at an angle --- Store in buckets with clean water --- Use floral preservative --- Store between 2 to 4 degrees Celsius Pest and Diseases: --- Leaf spotting Use In Floristry: --- Transitional flower in flower arrangements --- Traditionally used in wedding bouquets Customer advice: --- Keep in clean water at all times --- Store in a cool, well---ventilated area as flowers are known to wilt quickly --- Possesses a short vase life .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Plant Descriptions 2018 4/22/2018
Tyler Plant Sale - Plant Descriptions 2018 4/22/2018 TypeDesc Botanical Common Season of Exposure Size Description Name Name Interest Woody: Vine Clematis Clematis Summer to Sun to 8-10' Clematis 'Cardinal Wyszynski' dazzles your garden with huge 8" glowing 'Cardinal Fall Partial crimson flowers. The vibrant flowers are accented with darker crimson Wyszynski' Shade anthers and light pink filaments. Blooms in June-July and again in September. Attracts pollinators. Easy to grow in a rich, porous, alkaline soil. Provide shade for the roots with a generous layer of mulch or a shallow-rooted groundcover near the base of the vine. Received the Golden Medal at 'Plantarium' in 1990. Woody: Vine Clematis Hybrid Summer Sun to 6-8’ Fully double white flowers have yellow anthers and green outer petals. 'Duchess of Clematis Partial They are borne on the previous year’s growth and the current season’s Edinburgh' Shade new growth. This clematis does not require heavy pruning, remove only weak or dead stems in late spring. Tolerates most garden soils, needs protection from cold winds. Woody: Vine Clematis Clematis Early Sun to 8-10’ A beautiful, compact vine that covers itself with 5” shell pink flowers in 'Hagley Summer Partial summer. 'Hagley Hybrid' is also know as Pink Chiffon. This is a large- Hybrid' Shade flowering clematis that can be grown as a container plant. It is best keep out of full sun to prevent bleaching of flowers. Prefers moist, well-drained soil and for best results, mulch. TypeDesc Botanical Common Season of Exposure Size Description Name Name Interest Woody: Vine Clematis x Clematis Summer to Sun to 6-10' This deciduous hybrid clematis, has unusual and very striking deep blue durandii Fall Partial flowers with creamy stamens on a non-clinging, scrambling vine.
[Show full text]
Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
[Show full text]
GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
[Show full text]
Liliaceae Lily Family
Liliaceae lily family While there is much compelling evidence available to divide this polyphyletic family into as many as 25 families, the older classification sensu Cronquist is retained here. Page | 1222 Many are familiar as garden ornamentals and food plants such as onion, garlic, tulip and lily. The flowers are showy and mostly regular, three-merous and with a superior ovary. Key to genera A. Leaves mostly basal. B B. Flowers orange; 8–11cm long. Hemerocallis bb. Flowers not orange, much smaller. C C. Flowers solitary. Erythronium cc. Flowers several to many. D D. Leaves linear, or, absent at flowering time. E E. Flowers in an umbel, terminal, numerous; leaves Allium absent. ee. Flowers in an open cluster, or dense raceme. F F. Leaves with white stripe on midrib; flowers Ornithogalum white, 2–8 on long peduncles. ff. Leaves green; flowers greenish, in dense Triantha racemes on very short peduncles. dd. Leaves oval to elliptic, present at flowering. G G. Flowers in an umbel, 3–6, yellow. Clintonia gg. Flowers in a one-sided raceme, white. Convallaria aa. Leaves mostly cauline. H H. Leaves in one or more whorls. I I. Leaves in numerous whorls; flowers >4cm in diameter. Lilium ii. Leaves in 1–2 whorls; flowers much smaller. J J. Leaves 3 in a single whorl; flowers white or purple. Trillium jj. Leaves in 2 whorls, or 5–9 leaves; flowers yellow, small. Medeola hh. Leaves alternate. K K. Flowers numerous in a terminal inflorescence. L L. Plants delicate, glabrous; leaves 1–2 petiolate. Maianthemum ll. Plant coarse, robust; stems pubescent; leaves many, clasping Veratrum stem.
[Show full text]
Ohio Plant Disease Index
Special Circular 128 December 1989 Ohio Plant Disease Index The Ohio State University Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio This page intentionally blank. Special Circular 128 December 1989 Ohio Plant Disease Index C. Wayne Ellett Department of Plant Pathology The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio T · H · E OHIO ISJATE ! UNIVERSITY OARilL Kirklyn M. Kerr Director The Ohio State University Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio All publications of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center are available to all potential dientele on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, sex, age, handicap, or Vietnam-era veteran status. 12-89-750 This page intentionally blank. Foreword The Ohio Plant Disease Index is the first step in develop Prof. Ellett has had considerable experience in the ing an authoritative and comprehensive compilation of plant diagnosis of Ohio plant diseases, and his scholarly approach diseases known to occur in the state of Ohia Prof. C. Wayne in preparing the index received the acclaim and support .of Ellett had worked diligently on the preparation of the first the plant pathology faculty at The Ohio State University. edition of the Ohio Plant Disease Index since his retirement This first edition stands as a remarkable ad substantial con as Professor Emeritus in 1981. The magnitude of the task tribution by Prof. Ellett. The index will serve us well as the is illustrated by the cataloguing of more than 3,600 entries complete reference for Ohio for many years to come. of recorded diseases on approximately 1,230 host or plant species in 124 families.
[Show full text]
Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes
Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes Shichao Chen1., Dong-Kap Kim2., Mark W. Chase3, Joo-Hwan Kim4* 1 College of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, 2 Division of Forest Resource Conservation, Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Gyeonggi- do, Korea, 3 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom, 4 Department of Life Science, Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Abstract Phylogenetic analysis aims to produce a bifurcating tree, which disregards conflicting signals and displays only those that are present in a large proportion of the data. However, any character (or tree) conflict in a dataset allows the exploration of support for various evolutionary hypotheses. Although data-display network approaches exist, biologists cannot easily and routinely use them to compute rooted phylogenetic networks on real datasets containing hundreds of taxa. Here, we constructed an original neighbour-net for a large dataset of Asparagales to highlight the aspects of the resulting network that will be important for interpreting phylogeny. The analyses were largely conducted with new data collected for the same loci as in previous studies, but from different species accessions and greater sampling in many cases than in published analyses. The network tree summarised the majority data pattern in the characters of plastid sequences before tree building, which largely confirmed the currently recognised phylogenetic relationships. Most conflicting signals are at the base of each group along the Asparagales backbone, which helps us to establish the expectancy and advance our understanding of some difficult taxa relationships and their phylogeny.
[Show full text]
Early Cretaceous Lineages of Monocot Flowering Plants
Early Cretaceous lineages of monocot flowering plants Kåre Bremer* Department of Systematic Botany, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyva¨gen 18D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden Edited by Peter H. Raven, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO, and approved February 14, 2000 (received for review October 1, 1999) The phylogeny of ﬂowering plants is now rapidly being disclosed tionally complex and not feasible for dating large trees with by analysis of DNA sequence data, and currently, many Cretaceous several reference fossils. fossils of ﬂowering plants are being described. Combining molec- Herein, the focus is on divergence times for the basal nodes of ular phylogenies with reference fossils of known minimum age the monocot phylogeny, and any precision in dating the upper makes it possible to date the nodes of the phylogenetic tree. The nodes of the tree is not attempted. To this end, mean branch dating may be done by counting inferred changes in sequenced lengths from the terminals to the basal nodes of the tree are genes along the branches of the phylogeny and calculating change calculated. Unequal rates in different lineages are manifested as rates by using the reference fossils. Plastid DNA rbcL sequences and unequal branch lengths counting from the root to the terminals eight reference fossils indicate that Ϸ14 of the extant monocot in phylogenetic trees, and the procedure of calculating mean lineages may have diverged from each other during the Early branch lengths reduces the problem of unequal rates toward the Cretaceous >100 million years B.P. The lineages are very different base of the tree.
[Show full text]
United States Department of Agriculture LIST of INTERCEPTED
Bur.Ent. & P. Q. Issued May 1939 United States Department of Agriculture BUREAU OF ENTOMOLOGY AND PLANT QUARANTINE SERVICE AND REGULATORY ANNOUNCEMENTS LIST OF INTERCEPTED PLANT PESTS, 1937 (List of Pests Recorded During the Period July 1, 1936, to June 30, 1937, In- clusive, as Intercepted in, on, or with Plants and Plant Products Entering United States Territory.) INTRODUCTION The period covered by this report represents the twenty-fourth year for which lists of intercepted plant pests have been issued. While the earlier reports gave the details regarding practically all organisms found on the plant material in- spected, the present paper omits many organisms entirely and summarizes the interceptions of many common or incompletely determined pests in short para- graphs, hence the detailed table contains only a fraction of the total findings. This report is based on interceptions for which determinations were received and indexed during the fiscal year. Determinations for collections made late in the year are often received after the close of the year and are included with those of the following year. The summarized records cover pests intercepted in, on, or with plants and plant products (1) imported, (2) offered for but refused entry, (3) held as ships' stores, etc., and hence not imported through customs, (4) offered for entry for immediate export or for immediate transportation and exportation in bond, and (5) in domestic shipments reaching the mainland from Hawaii and Puerto Rico. A cross-indexed file covering the more important and interesting interceptions is maintained in Washington and serves as the basis for this list.
[Show full text]
FLORA of BEIJING Jinshuang Ma and Quanru Liu
URBAN HABITATS, VOLUME 1, NUMBER 1 • ISSN 1541-7115 FLORA OF BEIJING http://www.urbanhabitats.org Jinshuang Ma and Quanru Liu Flora of Beijing: An Overview and Suggestions for Future Research* Jinshuang Ma and Quanru Liu Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 1000 Washington Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11225; [email protected]; [email protected] nonnative, invasive, and weed species, as well as a lst Abstract This paper reviews Flora of Beijing (He, 1992), of relevant herbarium collections. We also make especially from the perspective of the standards of suggestions for future revisions of Flora of Beijing in modern urban floras of western countries. The the areas of description and taxonomy. We geography, land-use and population patterns, and recommend more detailed categorization of species vegetation of Beijing are discussed, as well as the by origin (from native to cultivated, including plants history of Flora of Beijing. The vegetation of Beijing, introduced, escaped, and naturalized from gardens which is situated in northern China, has been and parks); by scale and scope of distribution drastically altered by human activities; as a result, it (detailing from worldwide to special or unique local is no longer characterized by the pine-oak mixed distribution); by conservation ranking (using IUCN broad-leaved deciduous forests typical of the standards, for example); by habitat; and by utilization. northern temperate region. Of the native species that Finally, regarding plant treatments, we suggest remain, the following dominate: Pinus tabuliformis, improvements in the stability of nomenclature, Quercus spp., Acer spp., Koelreuteria paniculata, descriptions of taxa, and the quality and quantity of Vitex negundo var.
[Show full text]
Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene Ndhf Thomas J
Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 4 2006 Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF Thomas J. Givnish University of Wisconsin-Madison J. Chris Pires University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Missouri Sean W. Graham University of British Columbia Marc A. McPherson University of Alberta; Duke University Linda M. Prince Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Gardens See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Givnish, Thomas J.; Pires, J. Chris; Graham, Sean W.; McPherson, Marc A.; Prince, Linda M.; Patterson, Thomas B.; Rai, Hardeep S.; Roalson, Eric H.; Evans, Timothy M.; Hahn, William J.; Millam, Kendra C.; Meerow, Alan W.; Molvray, Mia; Kores, Paul J.; O'Brien, Heath W.; Hall, Jocelyn C.; Kress, W. John; and Sytsma, Kenneth J. (2006) "Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/4 Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF Authors Thomas J. Givnish, J. Chris Pires, Sean W. Graham, Marc A. McPherson, Linda M. Prince, Thomas B. Patterson, Hardeep S. Rai, Eric H. Roalson, Timothy M. Evans, William J. Hahn, Kendra C. Millam, Alan W. Meerow, Mia Molvray, Paul J. Kores, Heath W. O'Brien, Jocelyn C. Hall, W. John Kress, and Kenneth J. Sytsma This article is available in Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/ 4 Aliso 22, pp.
[Show full text]
2002 Plant Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Report
Plant Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Summary 2002 by: P.R. Bachi J.W. Beale J.R. Hartman D.E. Hershman W.C. Nesmith P. Vincelli TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................2 NATURE OF WORK ...................................................2 WEATHER SUMMARY .................................................3 CROP SUMMARY .....................................................6 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................11 EXPLANATORY REMARKS ...........................................11 SUMMARY TABLES Table 1. Summary of diagnoses by crop category and causal agent type ..........12 Table 2. Summary of biotic problems by crop category .......................13 Table 3. Number of plant specimens by crop category ........................13 Table 4. Summary of diagnoses by crop category and crop ....................14 Table 5. Summary of samples received by grower type and crop group ...........15 Table 6. Number of samples referred for diagnosis ..........................16 Table 7. Special laboratory tests performed ................................17 Table 8. Number of specimens received by county and crop category (KY and out-of-state sources) ................................18 Table 9. Summary of specialists and diagnosticians making primary diagnoses and consultations ..................................20 DIAGNOSIS OF INDIVIDUAL SAMPLES BY CROP AND DISEASE/DISORDER Agronomic crops .................................................. 21-25 Corn .........................................................21
[Show full text]
Table of Described Plants the Following Table Lists the Plants André Michaux Described in His North American Journals and Letters
Table of Described Plants The following table lists the plants André Michaux described in his North American journals and letters. It is organized according to Michaux’s names for the species, and modern scientific and common names are provided for each species. Note: an asterisk (*) indicates that the name applied by Michaux is rec- ognized for a different species, and page numbers in italics refer to photographs. Modern Michaux’s names Common Page(s) in this binomial for a particular species name(s) volume (scientific name) Abies / Abies balsamea / Pinus 178, 179, 184, balsamea / Pinus balsamifera / Pi- Abies balsamea (L.) Mill. balsam fir 186, 189, 193 nus, needles notched at the tip Abies canadensis / Abies spruce 43, 73, 111, 113, / Pine or Sapinette / Pinus ab- Tsuga canaden- 174, 175, 179, 196, eastern hemlock ies canadensis / Pinus canadensis / sis (L.) Carrière 227, 238, 256, Thuya canadensis / Hemlock pines 257, 306, 364 Abies nigra / Pinus abies nigra / Pinus Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP. black spruce / 186, 188, 189, 190, abies rubra / Pinus fol. denticulatis or Picea rubens Sarg. red spruce 191, 192, 193, 256 Abies nigra? / Abies leaves scat- Tsuga caroliniana Engelm. Carolina hemlock 256, 258, 364 tered on all sides [NC] Abies, with sparse leaves on all sides / Pinus, with few leaves Picea sp. spruce 175, 178, 179, 185 on all sides / Pinus abies Acacia Acacia sp. undetermined 152 Acacia nilotica (L.) acacia de cayenne / Acacia de cayenne / Mimosa gum Arabic 151 Willd. ex Delile gum Arabic tree Senegalia catechu (L. f.) Acacia from India khair 151 P. J. H. Hurter & Mabb.
[Show full text]