Comparing the Greek Hero to the Renaissance Polymath: How Their Similar Ideals Prove the Steadfastness of Human Nature

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparing the Greek Hero to the Renaissance Polymath: How Their Similar Ideals Prove the Steadfastness of Human Nature Comparing the Greek Hero to the Renaissance Polymath: How their Similar Ideals Prove the Steadfastness of Human Nature CMRS 110 December 2, 2016 Submitted to Zachary Yuzwa By Cassidy Sim Introduction Past scholars have done plenty of research looking into the qualities of an ancient Greek hero, and what traits were valued by the average person in classical Greek society; many others still have spent years studying the renowned polymath, or “perfect man” of the Renaissance. Both the ancient Greek hero and Renaissance polymath can be considered significant developments in the field of societal conception of ideal personal qualities. This study will take traits typically assigned to a Greek hero in past scholarly studies, and compare them to those of the ideal Renaissance man, to see what the two have in common, and therein, what humans value in general, regardless of the time frame. Through an analysis of ancient texts, including Homer’s Iliad and Virgil’s Aenied, as well as a consideration of various scholarly studies, it has become evident that ancient Greek heroes and the ideal man of the Renaissance are similar in their striving for “perfection” and appreciation of the arts, but contrast starkly when it comes to the underlying philosophies behind their character. This comparison shows how the societal conception of the “ideal person” changes its philosophical foundation over time with culture, but more importantly, the consistencies between the qualities that different societies value, even when separated by thousands of years, proves the steadfastness of human nature. Overview and Analysis of Concepts For this project, I have created an extremely brief sonnet cycle of 3 Shakespearean sonnets praising Achilles from a Renaissance speaker’s point of view. The purpose of the sonnet cycle is to demonstrate the similarities between the traits valued in the ancient Greek heroes, and those valued in the polymath of the Renaissance. The main difference between these “ideal” models for the time periods is the religious/philosophical foundation on which they stand; this difference is emphasized in the sonnets through the Renaissance speaker’s use of Christian motifs in place of Greek mythological references. The Renaissance speaker creates a sense that Achilles was a warrior of God, created in perfection, sent to cleanse the earth of heathens, and ultimately send Aeneas to found the Roman Empire, where Jesus would be born. Some parts of the original Greek story may have been altered in the sonnets to fit the speaker’s purpose, as was often the case in the Renaissance, where writers and poets used Greek mythology as inspiration for their work. From researching personal traits and skills valued in both ancient Greece and the Renaissance, it has become evident that both cultures hold the arts in high esteem (Boring, 1979; Grant, 1982; New World Encyclopedia, 2015) and both saw an increased appreciation for human form and realism, in particular (Grant, 1982). Terrence Boring finds that literate education as well as musical training were held in high regard. Cultural values like these suggest that idealistic Greek heroes, particularly in the later part of the Hellenistic period, would have placed value on scholarly achievement or musical and poetic ability, yet may not have possessed those literacies themselves. However, it is true that Hellenistic heroes put more sacred value on these objects than they did monetary or economic value (Gernet, 1981), while Renaissance artists often created their works as a means of income. Another striking similarity between the two cultures is their underlying striving for perfection. While the Greeks aimed for “perfectus,” a state of divinity/heroism achieved after sacrificing oneself to bring prosperity to one’s people, polymaths of the Renaissance strove to achieve mastery in all subjects to perfect oneself (New World Encyclopedia, 2015); both, however, often show themes relating to divine communion (Gernet, 1981; Budin, 2004; New World Encyclopedia, 2015). While religious differences divide the two, the Renaissance polymath and Greek hero show strikingly similar qualities and themes overall, regardless of the thousands of years between them. From this, it is demonstrated definitively that human ideals, and therein human nature, is a static concept. While underlying philosophies and deities change, the approach to heroism/perfection remains the same. This allows for a deeper understanding of humanity, and literature as a whole, because readers can be assured that the foundation of the emotion and memory put into ancient text is no less relevant now than when it was written. The following sonnets have been composed with reference to excerpts from Shakespeare’s Sonnet Cycle (Callaghan, 2007) to establish style, and they are intended to demonstrate, in as much realism as possible, the similarities between classical Greek and Renaissance values, while emphasizing the emotion relevant to both Achilles and the Renaissance poet regardless of the [Christian] religious underpin. The Sonnets Sonnet 1 Perfection is the babe borne unto Styx For baptism in her ever-flowing stream. Any man to gaze upon him transfixed By his fair figure’s celestial gleam. Master of the lyre, of war, and of wit, Divine by nature, he communes with God: The mighty warrior of ancient writ In whose everlasting wise steps men trod. Yet those most learned and skilled with thy tool, None can compare their sculpture to God’s hand, Thy best render seems but sketched by a fool When thy model, as Achilles, commands. No man since has achieved such perfection: More suited are we to mere reflection. The first of the sonnets mostly tells of Achilles’ perfection, in his appearance (4), mastery of several subjects (5, 8), and eventual godlike status (6). For the Renaissance polymath, academic and physical perfection was striven for; the ideal man would have a mastery of all subjects, including athletics, thereby achieving human perfection (New World Encyclopedia, 2015). Similarly, the ancient Greeks strove to achieve “perfectus,” which meant to commune with the gods; those who reached perfectus were heroes by definition: they became godlike after having brought wealth/fertility to their people, whether by sacrifice or some other feat (Budin, 2004; Gernet, 1981), like Achilles, through his masterful warfare and eventual death resulting from his killing Hector (which ultimately decided the fate of the war). Achilles was learned in the art of music, and in many representations, is shown as Chiron’s pupil, learning to play the lyre (5). Being an educated individual in the time of the Greeks, Achilles must then also have been considered “wise” (8); it was common for things like literacy, or musical ability in earlier times, to be held in high esteem (Boring, 1979). His “fair figure’s celestial gleam” (4) is meant to parallel descriptions of Christ, or other holy figures in the Bible, who are often represented with a divine halo. The last sestet of the sonnet stresses the unrivaled perfection of Achilles, and ends off in admittance that while Renaissance men may catch a glimpse at true perfection, it is not something humans are capable of, as God is the sole artist when it comes to such a thing. Sonnet 2 Fair-painted brilliance of Gods’ own hand: Achilles, blessed art thou and thine wrath, Thy endless vengeance brings plague to the damned: Sent to follow righteous His spoken path. Till thy blade runs red with royal blood, Retrieve thine angel taken in envy, Redeem thine brother lost, left slain in mud: Light pure the flame to rend this land clean. Yet to thine own fate, thou must pay no heed, The Father has bid it, so shall thee die. In death, the birth of a king dost thou breed, So forth shalt thou charge, and let thy spear fly. Play sweet the lyre, sing sacrifice, o lord, Send to judgement this idolatrous horde. Sonnet 2 focusses on Achilles’ part in the Trojan War. In the context of this sonnet, Achilles is acting as a divine vessel for God’s wrath, sent to “cleanse this land,” by essentially slaughtering the Trojans. For this reason, many allusions to Christianity and God are made. As a “plague” (3), Achilles resembles the biblical plagues of Egypt (Exodus 7-11, Bible). Line 5 refers to Hector’s death having sealed the fate of Achilles, and is followed by allusions to Helen (6) and the death of Patroclus (7), all of which are allusions to those found in Homer’s Iliad (Fagles, 1990). In line 11, the poet has alluded to the birth of a king, resultant from Achilles death. This can be interpreted as the rise of Aeneas founding Rome after the Trojan War, as told in Virgil’s Aeneid (Fagles, 2006), or when analyzed in conjunction with the third sonnet of the cycle, it could be considered a more direct reference to the eventual birth of Christ in the Roman Empire (Mathew 1:18, Bible). Thematically, there are several references to art in this sonnet, namely in line 1, “Fair-painted,” and in the first line of the rhyming couplet, “Play sweet the lyre, sing…” The inclusion of artistic imagery is used here to emphasize the shared adoration of art found in ancient Greece as well as during the Renaissance (Boring, 1979; Grant, 1982; New World Encyclopedia, 2015). Sonnet 3 Mislead in name and altar thee may be, Thyself blinded from thy true shepherd’s face: From worship of idols thou will not see, Till the one ruling god thou doth embrace. Thine veins run blooming with spirit of Saul: An essence that yet hath no name, no holy rite, And steers thine to yield to its inborn call, Breathed into thine flame by His divine might. Still, Ananias’ hand, thou too, shall save, Surrendered to Him, thou yield his son, And rest now soundly in the peace He gave, To soon fulfill what thy Lord bids be done.
Recommended publications
  • Nancy Siraisi
    CHARLES HOMER HASKINS PRIZE LECTURE FOR 2010 A Life of Learning Nancy Siraisi ACLS OCCASIONAL PAPER, No. 67 ACLS The 2010 Charles Homer Haskins Prize Lecture was presented at the ACLS Annual Meeting in Philadelphia, PA, on May 7, 2010. © 2010 by Nancy Siraisi CONTENTS On Charles Homer Haskins iv Haskins Prize Lecturers v Brief Biography of vi Nancy Siraisi Introduction ix by Pauline Yu A Life of Learning 1 by Nancy Siraisi ON CHARLES HOMER HASKINS Charles Homer Haskins (1870-1937), for whom the ACLS lecture series is named, was the first chairman of the American Council of Learned Societies, from 1920 to 1926. He began his teaching career at the Johns Hopkins University, where he received the B.A. degree in 1887 and the Ph.D. in 1890. He later taught at the University of Wisconsin and at Harvard, where he was Henry Charles Lea Professor of Medieval History at the time of his retirement in 1931, and dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences from 1908 to 1924. He served as president of the American Historical Association in 1922, and was a founder and the second president of the Medieval Academy of America (1926). A great American teacher, Charles Homer Haskins also did much to establish the reputation of American scholarship abroad. His distinction was recognized in honorary degrees from Strasbourg, Padua, Manchester, Paris, Louvain, Caen, Harvard, Wisconsin, and Allegheny College, where in 1883 he had begun his higher education at the age of 13. iv HASKINS PRIZE LECTURERS 2010 Nancy Siraisi 2009 William Labov 2008 Theodor Meron 2007 Linda Nochlin 2006 Martin E.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge of Polymath Walks, Talks, Makes Waves, Turns Into Deeds
    Knowledge of Polymath Walks, Talks, Makes Waves, Turns into Deeds Interviewee: Professor Hamlet Isaxanli Founder of Khazar University, Chairman, Board of Directors and Trustees Founding Member of Eurasian Academy Hamlet Isakhanli is a scientist, poet, social scientist, educator and lecturer, publisher and editor, translator, columnist, broadcaster – TV program presenter, public figure. He has published as author, co-author over 40 books and over 350 articles on a broad range of topics in mathematics and its applications; history of science and culture; poetry and creative writing; language, lexicography and literary studies; theory and history of translation; education policy and management. Interviewer: Waqas Ahmed Head of Special Projects, Global Correspondent, FIRST magazine Author of Polymathy (to be published) Waqas Ahmed: How would you define a polymath? Professor Hamlet Isaxanli:A polymath is a person who displays genuine creative activity in multiple fields that differ from one another. Despite the fact that the dictionary definition of the word “polymath” implies someone with much knowledge or varied learning, not just everyone who knows multiple fields well is called a polymath; to know and to produce are not the same. Understanding many things about physics, mathematics or biology from popular literature is absolutely not the same as being a physicist, mathematician or biologist. If a person contents himself with knowing but cannot turn his knowledge into action or some type of work, he is simply a very knowledgeable, erudite, educated person—he is not a polymath. The knowledge of a polymath does not remain passive or sit in one place. It walks, talks, makes waves, creates practical results, turns into deeds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosopher-Prophet in Avicenna's Political Philosophy
    The philosopher-prophet in Avicenna's political philosophy Author: James Winston Morris Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/4029 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Published in Political aspects of Islamic philosophy, pp. 152-198 Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States" (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/) The P~~losopher-Prophet in. AVic~nna's Political Philosophy. Chapter 4 of The PolItICal Aspects of IslamIc PhIlosophy, ed. C. Butterworth, Cambridge Harvard University Press, 1992, pp. 142-188. ' -FOUR- The Philosopher-Prophet in Avicenna~s Political Philosophy James W. Morris With time, human beings tend to take miracles for granted. Perhaps the most lasting and public of all miracles, those to which Islamic philosophers devoted so much of their reflections, were the political achievements of the prophets: how otherwise obscure figures like Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad came to shape the thoughts and actions of so much of civilized humanity. Within the high culture of Islamic civilization, the thought and writings of an itinerant Persian doctor and court administrator we know as Avicenna (370/980~28/1037) came to play a similarly central role: for almost a millenium, each of the tra­ ditions of Islamic thought claiming a wider, universal human validity has appealed either directly to his works or to logical and metaphysical disciplines whose Islamic forms were directly grounded in them. This study considers some of the central philosophic under­ pinnings of that achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Creativity Polymathy: What Benjamin Franklin Can Teach Your Kindergartener
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Learning and Individual Differences 20 (2010) 380–387 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Learning and Individual Differences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/lindif Creativity polymathy: What Benjamin Franklin can teach your kindergartener James C. Kaufman a,⁎, Ronald A. Beghetto b, John Baer c, Zorana Ivcevic d a Learning Research Institute, California State University at San Bernardino, 5500 University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 92407-2318, United States b University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, United States c Rider University, 2083 Lawrenceville Road, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-3099, United States d Tufts University, 490 Boston Ave, Medford, MA 02155, United States article info abstract Article history: Creative polymathy at the very highest levels is rare, but this is largely the result of a long period of training Received 4 February 2009 usually necessary to become proficient in any field. We explain why creative polymathy is not ruled out by Received in revised form 1 October 2009 arguments for the domain specificity of creativity and argue that consideration of multiple levels of creativity Accepted 10 October 2009 (Big-C, Pro-c, little-c, and mini-c) leads to the conclusion that creative polymathy may actually be fairly common.
    [Show full text]
  • A Polymath in Arcadia: Thomas Wright (1711-1786)
    1 A POLYMATH IN ARCADIA: THOMAS WRIGHT (1711-1786) The name of Thomas Wright is chiefly remembered for achievement in the realms of astronomy and architecture but his contribution to English landscape has received limited attention by comparison despite association with over thirty notable locations. It might have been the existence of other eighteenth-century quasi-eminent Thomas Wrights which led him to adopt the appellation ‘Thomas Wright of Durham’ since Thomas Wright was certainly not an uncommon name in County Durham if tombstones in proximity to Wright’s are any indicator - indeed the present day bishop of that diocese is one Tom Wright. This essay will trace the emergence of Thomas Wright as a key contributor to eighteenth – century landscape architecture through designs uniquely imbued with significance derived from his polymathic passions. ‘THOMAS WRIGHT OF DURHAM’ Thomas Wright‟s ranking amongst his contemporaries in garden history has waxed and waned like the heavenly bodies whose progress he traced so diligently. It is fortuitous that the Journal that he kept for the first thirty-five years of his life has survived revealing how a largely self-taught polymath with a lifelong habit of application to the acquisition of knowledge became a tutor, companion and landscape advisor to a host of inter-connected families of note.1 Whilst this complex web of aristocratic genealogical association linking Wright to an extended galaxy of locations remains to be fully explored, his Journal together with commentary from his contemporaries,
    [Show full text]
  • Villa Rossa Voice 2020
    Villa Rossa Number 34 | Spring 2020 Voice FRIENDS OF Syracuse Florence On the cover Marchese Bernardo Gondi with Dr. Ruth Chen and Chancellor Kent Syverud celebrating the 60th anniversary of Syracuse Florence at Palazzo Gondi on May 30, 2019. (Photo by Francesco Guazzelli) The VILLA ROSSA VOICE is a Syracuse University Florence publication. We welcome your questions and comments. Editorial staff Director Sasha Perugini Editor Michelle Tarnopolsky [email protected] Graphics and Layout Francesco Guazzelli [email protected] Tribunale di Firenze Registro Stampa Periodico No. 5854 All material © Syracuse University in Florence http://suflorence.syr.edu LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR AND THE EDITOR by Sasha Perugini and Michelle Tarnopolsky 5 HAVING A BALL PLAYING SOCCER IN FLORENCE AND REMEMBERING ASSISTANT DIRECTOR JIM KAUFFMAN 6 by Nick DeSantis (Syracuse University) A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE STUDYING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE 8 by Natalie Murphy (Reed College) ALL IN THE FAMILY PROFILE OF A SYRACUSE FLORENCE HOST FAMILY 9 Words and images by Alexa Mikhail (Syracuse University) LEONARDO AND THE BEAST A LECTURE BY ROSS KING 10 by Caitlin Mary Petty (Syracuse University) HITTING THE RIGHT NOTE SINGING IN FLORENCE’S ST. JAMES CHOIR 11 by Eunice Lee (Northwestern University) RAG REVOLUTION LEARNING ABOUT SUSTAINABLE FASHION IN FLORENCE by Ramsay Everitt (Colorado College) 12 A BOAT AWAY FROM HOME CULTURAL EXCHANGE THROUGH SPORT by Elizabeth Fairman (Bates College) 13 ONE TO REMEMBER THE GUASTI MONUMENT PHOTO CONTEST 14 by Sharifa Lookman (Syracuse University) A QUESTION OF COLOR ETHNIC DIVERSITY WHILE STUDYING ABROAD by Cindy Mei (Emory University) 15 SHORT BUT SWEET ATTENDING SYRACUSE FLORENCE WHEN THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC STRUCK ITALY by Erick Lojano-Quispe (Syracuse University) 16 MANGIA,MANGIA! FIVE THINGS TO KNOW WHEN EATING OUT IN ITALY by Camila Wanderley (Syracuse University) 17 STAFF & FACULTY WATCH 18 CONTENTS Letter from the Director Some of our alumni still write to us to recall the days when they literally put their hands in dirt to help during the 1966 flood.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full
    International Journal of Innovative Social Sciences & Humanities Research 6(4):33-37, Oct. Dec., 2018 © SEAHI PUBLICATIONS, 2018 www.seahipaj.org ISSN: 2354-2926 An Overview on Alkindi’s Translations at House of Wisdom: An Islamic Philosophical Reflection Abdulrashid Musa1, Ibrahim Labbo2, Bello Shehu3, and Lawali Bello4 Postgraduate Students, Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Arts and Islamic Studies, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Acquisition, utilization, preservation, and dissemination of important knowledge to desirable audience are part of the major targets of academic works particularly in an Islamic exposition. These could only be achieved if centers and institutions responsible are duly established and designed for educational development as done in Baghdad at the House of Wisdom by the Abbasid Caliphs (Al-Mamun). The contribution of Al-Kindi which is recorded as the first of its kind in the Arab world is virtually a companion for reflection to every researcher aiming to convey knowledge. Al-Kindi translated philosophical Greek works into Arabic, and therefore makes it useful to not only the Arabs, but also all those in contact with Arabic language. Relaying on secondary data, the research work gives an overview on the significance of Bayt Al-Hikma, enclosing the effort of Al-Kindi for preserving and disseminating important knowledge. Therefore, the research work presented some philosophical views of Al-Kindi, though; he contributed in different aspect of sciences. It in the main, calls for reflection to services rendered at Bayt Al-Hikma with special consideration to the effort of Al-Kindi.
    [Show full text]
  • The Renaissance
    The Renaissance THERE is a strong sense of unreality about the Renais- sance — that intellectual flowering which is supposed to be a sort of a dividing line between modern European civiliza- tion and the Middle Ages. But the Renaissance had no clear beginning and no real end. The “Age of the Renaissance” conventionally begins around 1450. It has no specific dates. There were large sectors of Europe that were never touched by the Renaissance. Some historians have written that the Renaissance was the most remarkable feature of the age, and yet, it affected only a very tiny area of Europe. Thus, this intellectual movement–this rebirth–that did so much to revolutionize our art and literature, philosophy and worldview–that is so immensely significant to us, was untypical and unrepresentative of the time and place that was 15th century Europe. Faced with this problem, many historians of the period have lost interest in the Renaissance. Many historians now like to spotlight magic, poverty, disease, or the Leonardo Da Vinci... horrors of European colonial ventures. But, we should remember the artistic and was an Italian polymath: intellectual achievements made by the exceptional intellects of the Renaissance. The scientist, mathematician, Renaissance is what made 17th century Europe so different from 15th century Europe. engineer, inventor, anato- An American historian complained that,“Ever since the Renaissance invented mist, painter, sculptor, ar- itself some six hundred years ago, there has been no agreement as to what it is.” The chitect, musician, and Renaissance, for example, was not simply about a renewed interest in classical ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Thought Experiments in Medieval Islam”
    1 Jon McGinnis “Experimental thoughts on thought experiments in medieval Islam” Abstract The study begins with the language employed in and the psychological basis of thought experiments as understood by certain medieval Arabic philosophers. It then provides a taxonomy of different kinds of thoughts experiments used in the medieval Islamic world. These include purely fictional thought experiments, idealizations and finally thought experiments using ingenious machines. The study concludes by suggesting that thought experiments provided a halfway house during this period between a staunch rationalism and an emerging empiricism. 1. Introduction There is no (medieval) Arabic term or phrase for “thought experiment”. Be that as it may, medieval philosophers and scientists working in Arabic both concretely employed thought experiments in their philosophies and discussed their merits and demerits abstractly. Indeed, it would seem that thought experiments truly captured the imagination of medieval thinkers in the Muslim world, who left behind a significant body of examples and analyses of such experiments. What follows makes no pretense to being a complete history of that body of work. Instead, this study focuses primarily, although by no means exclusively, on thought experiments as they are used and discussed in Ibn Sīnā (980–1037), the Avicenna of Latin fame. Along the way, however, this study also touches on other notable figures and their uses and thoughts about thought experiments. These figures include the famed medieval Arabic optician Ibn al-Haytham (965–1040, Lt. Alhazen) and the renowned Muslim Theologian Abū Ḥamid al-Ghazālī (1058–1111). As a first pass, one can divide thought experiments in the medieval Arabic world into two classes: those that are in principle impossible to carry out and those 2 that at least appear to be possible to carry out even if in practice they cannot.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    World Journal of Education and Humanities ISSN 2687-6760 (Print) ISSN 2687-6779 (Online) Vol. 2, No. 3, 2020 www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/wjeh Original Paper Dimitrie Cantemir—A Polymath and Outstanding Personality of Romanian People Dumitru Căldare1* 1 Department of Philosophy and Anthropology, Faculty of History and Philosophy, Moldova State University, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, 60, A. Mateevici Str., Chisinau * Dumitru Căldare, Department Filosophy and Anthropology, Faculty of History and Philosophy, Moldova State University, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, 60, A. Mateevici Str., Chisinau Received: January 16, 2020 Accepted: February 12, 2020 Online Published: February 22, 2020 doi:10.22158/wjeh.v2n3p47 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/wjeh.v2n3p47 Abstract The present article concisely reveals the results of the thorough study of Christian concepts, reflections and educational values of Dimitrie Cantemir’s work, which are becoming currently central for modern society. The scholar demonstrated the real value of the universal national spirit, the Man-Universe correlation, and the essence of the theologico-physical concept. His philosophical system sets great store on the true knowledge of the world through the knowledge of God, and the knowledge of man as master of the world, as homo universalis. The article attaches great importance to the postulation, according to which, the philosophical consciousness in Romanian philosophy focuses on contemplation and eternity, and reason-faith correlation is a realistic foundation for the adequate elevation of human dignity. The article argues the idea that Dimitrie Cantemir’s humanism reflects the true wisdom and education of the Romanian people expressed both in the ontological-gnoseological context and in the social-political context, especially in terms of ancestry and the origin of the language.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic View of Nature and Values: Could These Be the Answer to Building Bridges Between Modern Science and Islamic Science
    International Education Journal, 2007, 8(2), 461-469. ISSN 1443-1475 © 2007 Shannon Research Press. http://iej.com.au 461 Islamic view of nature and values: Could these be the answer to building bridges between modern science and Islamic science Yasmeen Mahnaz Faruqi1 Flinders University, School of Education [email protected] This paper discusses the baics tenets of Islam and the Islamic view of nature that were influential in the development of science in the so-called ‘Golden Age of Islam’. These findings have been the catalyst for present day Muslim scholars, who have emphasized the importance of Islamic science, as the means of understanding Western science. There is also a strong body of opinion within researchers of Islamic science that the abandonment of Islamic values and the rapid adoption of Western science and technologies have led to conflict in social, educational and scientific fields in Islamic countries. The article examines how these two views can be reconciled in order to build bridges between modern science and Islamic science. Islamic science, tenets of Islam, Islamic values, modern science, view of nature INTRODUCTION Contemporary Muslim and non-Muslim scholars have recognized that scientific knowledge is not necessarily neutral and objective, but instead carries values and concepts that are explicit to modern Western culture (Rehman, 2003). Therefore this has resulted in a concerted effort by contemporary Islamic scholars to call for an ‘Islamic science’ or the ‘Islamization of knowledge’ (Golshani, 2000b; Davies, 1991; Ravetz, 1991). Islamic scholars have also been calling for an investigation to reflect back to the so-called ‘Golden Age of Islam’ when there seemed to have been development in science; and an acceptance of harmony between religion and science.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the BOOK Chapter 4. the Middle Ages in the West and East
    HISTORY of the BOOK Chapter 4. The Middle Ages in the West and East Monasteries, courts, manuscripts, publishing Overview From the origins of the codex in the 2-3rd centuries of the Common Era until the invention of movable type in Germany in the mid-15th century, manuscript production dominated literacy technologies in Europe and the Middle East. Literacy was limited, especially in the early centuries of this period, but continued to flourish among scholars, most of whom were associated with the study of Jewish, Christian, and then Islamic or other religious communities.1 Handwritten documents served administrative and bureaucratic functions in secular areas of culture—for legal purposes, official records, correspondence, and any other written communication. But even in these domains, writing was not widespread or systematic. Scroll and print production flourished in the Far East in the production and copying of Buddhist prayers, Hindu manuscripts, and legal, administrative, and literary documents. Knowledge of woodblock printing, paper production, and other technologies used for the printing of texts in China and India, was not transferred to Europe during this period. It is important to keep in mind that literate communities in the Indian sub-continent were well established at this time, as they were in China (where the Imperial Examination used in selection of royal appointments required knowledge of canonical Chinese texts).2 The isolation of populations from each other created distinctly different conditions in various areas of the world. Literacy existed in small pockets, in local communities, Figure 1. Frederic Kenyon, Ancient Books and in a range of cultures in India, Asia, parts of Europe and North and Modern Discoveries, Chicago: The Africa.
    [Show full text]