remote sensing
Article The SARSense Campaign: Air- and Space-Borne C- and L-Band SAR for the Analysis of Soil and Plant Parameters in Agriculture
David Mengen 1,*, Carsten Montzka 1 , Thomas Jagdhuber 2,3 , Anke Fluhrer 2,3 , Cosimo Brogi 1 , Stephani Baum 4, Dirk Schüttemeyer 5, Bagher Bayat 1 , Heye Bogena 1 , Alex Coccia 6, Gerard Masalias 6, Verena Trinkel 4, Jannis Jakobi 1, François Jonard 1,7 , Yueling Ma 1, Francesco Mattia 8, Davide Palmisano 8 , Uwe Rascher 4 , Giuseppe Satalino 8, Maike Schumacher 9, Christian Koyama 10, Marius Schmidt 1 and Harry Vereecken 1
1 Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Bio-and Geosciences: Agrosphere (IBG-3), 52428 Jülich, Germany; [email protected] (C.M.); [email protected] (C.B.); [email protected] (B.B.); [email protected] (H.B.); [email protected] (J.J.); [email protected] (F.J.); [email protected] (Y.M.); [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (H.V.) 2 German Aerospace Center, Microwaves and Radar Institute, 82234 Wessling, Germany; [email protected] (T.J.); [email protected] (A.F.) 3 Institute of Geography, University of Augsburg, 86135 Augsburg, Germany 4 Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Bio- and Geosciences: Plant Sciences (IBG-2), 52428 Jülich, Germany; [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (V.T.); [email protected] (U.R.) 5 Mission Science Division, European Space Agency, 2201 Noordwijk, The Netherlands; [email protected] 6 Metasensing BV, 2201 Noordwijk, The Netherlands; [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (G.M.) 7 Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Citation: Mengen, D.; Montzka, C.; 8 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Institute for Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment (IREA), Jagdhuber, T.; Fluhrer, A.; Brogi, C.; 70126 Bari, Italy; [email protected] (F.M.); [email protected] (D.P.); [email protected] (G.S.) Baum, S.; Schüttemeyer, D.; Bayat, B.; 9 Geodesy and Surveying, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark; [email protected] Bogena, H.; Coccia, A.; et al. The 10 School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Tokyo 120-8551, Japan; [email protected] SARSense Campaign: Air- and * Correspondence: [email protected] Space-Borne C- and L-Band SAR for the Analysis of Soil and Plant Abstract: With the upcoming L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite mission Radar Ob- Parameters in Agriculture. Remote serving System for Europe L-band SAR (ROSE-L) and its integration into existing C-band satellite Sens. 2021, 13, 825. https://doi.org/ missions such as Sentinel-1, multi-frequency SAR observations with high temporal and spatial reso- 10.3390/rs13040825 lution will become available. The SARSense campaign was conducted between June and August
Received: 25 January 2021 2019 to investigate the potential for estimating soil and plant parameters at the agricultural test site in Accepted: 18 February 2021 Selhausen (Germany). It included C- and L-band air- and space-borne observations accompanied by Published: 23 February 2021 extensive in situ soil and plant sampling as well as unmanned aerial system (UAS) based multispec- tral and thermal infrared measurements. In this regard, we introduce a new publicly available SAR Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral data set and present the first analysis of C- and L-band co- and cross-polarized backscattering signals with regard to jurisdictional claims in regarding their sensitivity to soil and plant parameters. Results indicate that a multi-frequency published maps and institutional affil- approach is relevant to disentangle soil and plant contributions to the SAR signal and to identify iations. specific scattering mechanisms associated with the characteristics of different crop type, especially for root crops and cereals.
Keywords: ROSE-L; soil moisture; plant parameters; L-band; C-band; SAR; airborne campaign Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and 1. Introduction conditions of the Creative Commons With the increasing impact of human activities and the effects of climate change on Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// hydrological systems worldwide, appropriate and adapted management and mitigation creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ concepts are required [1–4]. This is particularly true with regard to the goal of using 4.0/).
Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 825. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040825 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 825 2 of 29
natural resources more effectively and sustainably in the future [5]. Since soil moisture and water-related vegetation conditions are key parameters in this context, they need to be assessed and monitored at both global and local scales. By providing global data with high temporal and spatial resolution, modern Earth Observation (EO) satellites have become a key technology in this field, whose importance will significantly increase in the future [6–8]. Radar Observing System for Europe L-band SAR (ROSE-L), as one of the Copernicus High Priority Candidate satellite missions is foreseen to be able to target the abovemen- tioned objectives. The mission was first agreed on at the European Space Agency (ESA) ministerial conference Space19+ in Seville in November 2019 and was contractually signed by ESA and Thales Alenia Space later in December 2020 as part of the Fourth ESA Coper- nicus Space Component Program. With a scheduled launch in 2028, the two satellites, carrying a quad-polarimetric L-band SAR, are designed for collecting valuable data, espe- cially for various research and applications in the field of soil moisture, land cover mapping, maritime surveillance, and natural and anthropogenic hazards [9]. A third add-on satellite is currently under discussion for bi-static records (ROSE-L+). In synergy with the existing Sentinel-1 A/B SAR mission, ROSE-L will enhance the European radar imaging capacity by increasing the frequency of successive radar data collections. In this regard, it will also enhance the possibilities for using soil and plant parameter retrieval based on change detection methods (e.g., alpha approximation and interferometry methods). Since L-band wavelength is able to penetrate through various media like vegetation or dry snow, it additionally provides unique information that cannot be obtained using higher frequency bands like the Sentinel-1 C-band and vice versa [10–12]. In combination, a quasi multi- band space-borne radar product can be obtained, which is currently only available using individual airborne flight campaigns [9]. The joint NASA-ISRO SAR (NISAR) satellite mission planned by NASA and Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) for 2022 can be seen as a potential precursor, carrying both an L- and S-band SAR [13]. In the course of the planning phase of the ROSE-L satellite mission, the potential of L-band SAR data for the proposed applications and the synergy effects from combining L- and C-band SAR data need to be explored. Such information will help to optimize ROSE-L regarding its synergies with the Sentinel-1 mission as well as with other radar satellite missions, e.g., RADARSAT Constellation Mission (RCM), NISAR, Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS-2/4), Satélite Argentino de Observación con Microondas (SAOCOM), TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X, Paz, and optical satellite missions, e.g., Sentinel-2 and the Landsat series. Various flight campaigns were conducted in the past to unlock the information content of SAR data, particularly for measuring environmental parameters over agricultural and forested areas as • The AgriSAR 2006 campaign was conducted over the Durable Environmental Multidis- ciplinary Monitoring Information Network (DEMMIN) agricultural site in Germany recorded C- and L-band SAR observations and multispectral images in preparation of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 satellite missions [14]. • TropiSAR 2009 campaign was conducted over Nouragues, Paracou in French Guiana, with simultaneous P- and L-band SAR data recording, evaluating the potential of SAR for estimation of biomass over tropical forests [15]. • The Airborne Microwave Observatory of Subcanopy and Subsurface (AirMOSS) flight campaign was conducted between 2012 and 2015 using P-band SAR for polarimetric measurements over major North American biomes, especially focusing on root-zone soil moisture [16]. • The NASA-ISRO Airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) flight campaign in 2019 was conducted over different biomes in North America, investigating the potential of L- and S-band for environmental monitoring in the context of the upcoming NISAR satellite mission [17]. • The UAVSAR AM-PM campaign in 2019 was conducted over different biomes in the Southeastern United States in preparation for the upcoming NISAR satellite mission, using L-band SAR with alternating morning and evening acquisition times [18]. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 825 3 of 29
Soil moisture, being one of the key parameters within the hydrological cycle, is of high interest for a wide range of research, e.g., for weather and climate research, hydrological modeling, and water resources management [19–21]. In addition, as soil moisture directly affects agricultural production, e.g., by water stress and irrigation demand, it is a crucial parameter for agricultural management decisions and practices at a local scale [22]. As polarimetric SAR data is capable of estimating soil moisture for various environmental and vegetation conditions, the potential of this technology has already been assessed, and various methods are currently employed for soil moisture retrieval [22–24]. The SAR backscatter coefficient sigma nought (σ0) is directly proportional to the effective scattering area of an illuminated surface, and is affected both by surface parameters, e.g., soil moisture content (mv), soil texture, surface roughness, and vegetation cover, as well as observation system (instrument) parameters, e.g., frequency, polarization, and incidence angle (θ)[25–30]. Being affected by the vegetation cover, plant parameters like plant height and vegetation water content can also be inferred using SAR data [31–33]. Due to the different wavelengths, C- and L-band SAR differ in their sensitivity to soil and plant parameters, allowing more detailed parameter observations and monitoring when combined. In this context, the SARSense flight campaign was carried out between the 19 June and 9 August 2019 to investigate the potential and synergy effects of using full-polarized, multi-frequency SAR data regarding soil and plant parameter retrieval for bare soil and under various vegetation covers [34]. The campaign was conducted on the Terrestrial Environmental Observatories (TERENO) field research site, named Selhausen, located near Jülich, Germany [35]. Simultaneous to the L- and C-band SAR observations, in situ measurements and UAS mapping were performed. The aim of this contribution is to characterize the study area (Section2), to describe the SAR, UAS, and in situ observation strategy and collected data (Section3), to inform about data pre-processing and applied methods (Section4), to present and discuss the main results with respect to the above- mentioned campaign objectives (Sections5 and6), as well as to publish the dataset for making them publicly available for further research in the community.
2. Study Area The Selhausen test site (50.865◦N, 6.447◦E) is an intensively cultivated area of about 1 km2 in the Eastern part of the Rur catchment in Germany. It is part of the Eifel/Lower Rhine Valley Observatory within the TERENO initiative, involving six Helmholtz Associa- tion Centers at four distinct observatories across Germany, aiming at the long-term and integrated observation of the effects of climate and global change on especially vulnerable terrestrial environments. This includes both the subsurface and land surface as well as the lower atmosphere and anthroposphere [36]. Within a multitemporal and multi-scale approach, the TERENO initiative provides real-time measurement platforms to monitor related environmental parameters and conduct controlled field experiments [37–39]. Being used as a soil moisture validation site for the microwave satellite missions Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS), Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP), and ALOS-2, multiple active and passive L-band airborne campaigns were conducted since 2010 at this test site [40–42]. Furthermore, it is a Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Land Product Validation Subgroup (CEOS LPV) Supersite for the validation of satellite-derived products and is part of the Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS) program (field 11), a European- wide, standardized measuring network of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations and exchange fluxes with terrestrial and marine ecosystems [43]. The Selhausen test site consists of 56 individual agricultural fields (Figure1; Table1) . The test site comprises a great diversity in agricultural cropping structure due to the prop- erty fragmentation between farmers and a heterogeneous subsurface. Representing the agricultural landuse of the Lower Rhine Embayment, winter wheat, sugar beet, winter barley, potato, silage maize and winter rapeseed are generally cultivated in rotation. Occa- sionally, cabbage, oat, and rye are cultivated while some fields are left bare or covered with grass or catch crops. Located in the tempered maritime climate zone, the mean annual tem- Remote Sens. 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 28
with grass or catch crops. Located in the tempered maritime climate zone, the mean an- nual temperature and precipitation are 10.2 °C and 741 mm, respectively [35]. The major soil types are (gleyic) Luvisol and (gleyic) Cambisol with in majorly silty loam texture [35], having a high variability in the percentage of individual grain size classes in the up- permost 30 cm of soil (sand: 13–35%, silt = 52–70%, clay = 13–17%) [44,45]. Due to a weak inclination of the terrain (<4°), colluvial sediments are deposited on parts of the lower areas. Underneath, eolian sediments from Pleistocene and Holocene with a thickness of up to 2 m are placed on top of Quaternary, mostly fluvial sediments from the Rhine/Meuse Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 825 river and Rur river system [45,46]. In fact, recent studies on remote and proximal sensing4 of 29 of the leaf area index (LAI), as well as crop modelling revealed a historic river channel system on the test site, influencing the crop development during the growing season, es- peciallyperature at and dry precipitationsoil conditions are [46–48]. 10.2 ◦C In and this 741 regard, mm, respectivelyalso the surface [35]. soil The moisture major soil content types (SSMC)are (gleyic) is highly Luvisol variable and (gleyic) across Cambisol the site [44]. with Furthermore, in majorly silty a loamrecent texture study [developed35], having a a high-resolution,high variability inmeter-scaled the percentage soil ofmap individual with 18 soil grain types size for classes the test in the site uppermost using electromag- 30 cm of neticsoil (sand:induction 13–35%, (EMI) silt measurements = 52–70%, clay on = 51 13–17%) agricultural [44,45 fields]. Due in to the a weak Selhausen inclination area [45]. of the terrainThe (<4 flight◦), colluvial campaign sediments was carried are out deposited during ona severe parts ofdrought the lower that areas.affected Underneath, broad re- gionseolian from sediments North-East from to Pleistocene Western Europe and Holocene in 2019 [49]. with The a thickness monthly of temperature up to 2 m are was placed sig- nificantlyon top of Quaternary,above and precipitation mostly fluvial significantly sediments frombelow the the Rhine/Meuse long-term averages river and (Figure Rur river 2), resultingsystem [ 45in ,low46]. to In very fact, low recent SSMC studies values, on with remote a mean and of proximal 8 vol.% sensingin June and of the 17 leafvol.% area in August.index (LAI), Due asto wellthe asunderlying crop modelling historic revealed river channels, a historic the river SSMC channel was system highly on variable the test acrosssite, influencing the Selhausen the cropsite, developmentwith higher SSMC during found the growing in areas, season, with deeper especially river at channel dry soil sedimentsconditions [46,48]. [46–48 ].This In thiseffect regard, was also also observable the surface in soil the moisturemultispectral content and (SSMC) thermal is record- highly ings.variable To cope across with the these site [drought44]. Furthermore, conditions, a pa recentrts of study the test developed site were a irrigated high-resolution, during themeter-scaled investigated soil period. map with Irrigation 18 soil was types either for the performed test site usingby the electromagnetic farmers or during induction a spe- cific(EMI) experiment. measurements on 51 agricultural fields in the Selhausen area [45].
FigureFigure 1.1. Map ofof thethe SelhausenSelhausen testtest sitesite andand airborneairborne flightflight tracks tracks (left) (left) as as well well as as the the individual individ- crop typesual crop and types field and IDs (right).field IDs (right).
Table 1. Overview of crop types and field IDs for the Selhausen test site.
Crop Type Field ID bare soil F09a, F10 barley F15, F16, F17b, F20, F22a, F27, F33, F35, F36, F39, F48b cabbage F54 oat F23b, F25, F30, F56 potato F11, F14b rye F18ab, F49b, F46 silage maize F03, F06, F09b, F13a, F24b, F41, F42, F44a, F51b, F55 sugar beet F01, F04, F14a, F21, F28, F40, F44b, F47 wheat F05, F07, F8_24, F12, F13ba, F17a, F22cb, F23a, F37, F38, F50c, F51a winter rapeseed F53
The flight campaign was carried out during a severe drought that affected broad regions from North-East to Western Europe in 2019 [49]. The monthly temperature was significantly above and precipitation significantly below the long-term averages Remote Sens. 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 28
Table 1. Overview of crop types and field IDs for the Selhausen test site.
Crop Type Field ID Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 825bare soil F09a, F10 5 of 29 barley F15, F16, F17b, F20, F22a, F27, F33, F35, F36, F39, F48b cabbage F54 oat F23b, F25, F30, F56 (Figure2), resulting in low to very low SSMC values, with a mean of 8 vol.% in June potato F11, F14b and 17 vol.% in August. Due to the underlying historic river channels, the SSMC was rye F18ab, F49b, F46 highly variable across the Selhausen site, with higher SSMC found in areas, with deeper silage maize river channel F03, sediments F06, F09b, [46 F13a,,48]. ThisF24b, effect F41, wasF42, alsoF44a, observable F51b, F55 in the multispectral and sugar beet thermal recordings. F01, To F04, cope F14a, with F21, these F28, drought F40, F44b, conditions, F47 parts of the test site were wheat irrigated F05, duringF07, F8_24, the investigated F12, F13ba, period.F17a, F22cb, Irrigation F23a, was F37, either F38, F50c, performed F51a by the farmers or winter rapeseedduring a specific experiment. F53
Figure 2. Precipitation and temperature measurements of 2019 compared to the long-term average (29 years). Within the Figure 2. Precipitation and temperature measurements of 2019 compared to the long-term average period of the SARSense campaign, it was both hotter and dryer than average. (29 years). Within the period of the SARSense campaign, it was both hotter and dryer than average. 3. Data 3. Data For the SARSense campaign, airborne C- and L-band recordings were performed on For the SARSense campaign, airborne C- and L-band recordings were performed on the 19, 21, 25, and 27 of June and 8 and 9 of August 2019, while simultaneously measuring the 19, 21, 25, and 27 of June and 8 and 9 of August 2019, while simultaneously measuring in situ soil temperature, soil moisture, bulk electrical conductivity, pore water electrical in situ soil temperature, soil moisture, bulk electrical conductivity, pore water electrical conductivity, dielectric permittivity, as well as vegetation height. The explicit measurement conductivity, dielectric permittivity, as well as vegetation height. The explicit measure- of vegetation parameters in the field and in the laboratory was conducted on the 25 June ment of vegetation parameters in the field and in the laboratory was conducted on the 25 and 7 August 2019. Among others, the fresh weight, dry weight and water content of leaves June and 7 August 2019. Among others, the fresh weight, dry weight and water content and stems were measured as well as the leaf area, phenology code, plant height and leaf of leaves and stems were measured as well as the leaf area, phenology code, plant height chlorophyll concentration. An overview of all measured soil and vegetation parameters and leaf chlorophyll concentration. An overview of all measured soil and vegetation pa- can be found in the AppendixA (Table1). For a comparison with space-borne SAR data, 58 rameters can beSentinel-1 found in the (VV Appendix and VH) andA (Tab 6 ALOS-2le A1). For scenes a comparison (HH and HV) with were space-borne acquired for the period SAR data, 58 Sentinel-1from the (VV 1 June and to VH) 31 August and 6 2019.ALOS-2 In addition,scenes (HH cosmic-ray and HV) neutron were acquired sensing using a mobile for the period fromcosmic-ray the 1 June rover to 31 was August conducted 2019. onIn addition, the 27 June cosmic-ray and 8 August neutron 2019. sensing Using UASs, RGB using a mobile mapscosmic-ray were rover taken was on the conducte 17 andd 26on June, the 27 the June 3 and and 25 8 August July, and 2019. 8 August Using 2019 as well as UASs, RGB mapstemperature were taken and on multispectralthe 17 and 26 observationsJune, the 3 and taken 25 July, on the and 26 8 and August 27 June 2019 2019. as well as temperatureAs and the Selhausenmultispectral test observations site is part of taken the TERENO on the 26 and and ICOS 27 June program, 2019. numerous mea- As the Selhausensuring test stations site is for part climate, of the soil,TERENO and vegetation and ICOS parametersprogram, numerous are permanently meas- installed and uring stations forrunning/monitoring. climate, soil, and vegetation This includes parameters two eddy are covariance permanently and installed three climate and stations, mea- running/monitoring.suring This fluxes includes and meteorological two eddy covariance parameters and respectively,three climate a stations, groundwater meas- well measuring uring fluxes andwater meteorological level, conductivity, parameters and respectively, temperature, a groundwater as well as four well automated measuring closed dynamic water level, conductivity,chambers for and measuring temperature, soil COas 2wellemissions. as four Inautomated addition, closed 18 lysimeters dynamic continuously de- chambers for measuringtermine water soil CO balance2 emissions. parameters In addition, (soil matrix 18 lysimeters potential, continuously soil temperature, de- soil heat flux, termine water balanceand soil parameters water content). (soil Twomatrix rhizotron potential, facilities soil temperature, enable root growthsoil heat observations flux, and soil and soil water content).moisture Two monitoring rhizotron with facilities ground-penetrating enable root growth radar andobservations borehole and cameras soil in both lateral moisture monitoringand vertical with grou directionsnd-penetrating during a radar crop growingand borehole cycle. cameras in both lateral and vertical directions during a crop growing cycle. 3.1. C- and L-Band Airborne SAR The C- and L-band SAR data were acquired and processed by the company MetaSens- ing. The carrier was a Cessna 208 with left side-looking antennas having a nominal look ◦ ◦ ◦ angle of 45 , resulting in incidence angles ranging from 30 to 55 . The flight altitude was around 1620 m (Figure3). To cover the larger Selhausen agricultural area, three tracks were flown per campaign day, with two ascending (track A and B) and one descending (track C) flight track and about 20% overlap among adjacent scenes. The producer-side processing Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 825 6 of 29
steps of the radar data consist of range compression, global back-projection, geometric and radiometric calibration. Three (75 cm) corner reflectors were set up for calibration, but due to misalignment, they were only used for geometric calibration. For radiometric calibration, the C- and L-band images were calibrated among themselves, based on the estimated noise level of each data take. The first acquisition was taken as a reference value for both C- and L-band frequencies and from these, a relative noise level was calculated for each track to zero-out any temporal fluctuation. To minimize the mean offset between C-band airborne and space-borne datasets, the Sentinel-1 scene 20190620T055005a was Remote Sens. 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 28 used to calculate a global calibration factor for matching the reflectivity histograms of both data sets for a common patch over a uniformly forested area. Based on empirical values found in the literature, the L-band airborne data was calibrated using a similar procedure. Afterresolution aggregating of 5 m by the 20 L-bandm by using data Terrain for all Observation missions, the with backscatter Progressive histogram Scans SAR over (TOP- the sameSAR). uniformly For GRDH, forested the resolution area was is calculated. resampled Then, into a a 10 calibration m by 10 m constant pixel spacing. for the airborneThe data L-bandwas obtained system using was estimatedthe Google such Earth that Engine its histogram (GEE) web mean platform, would already fall 2.5 dBbeing below pre-pro- that ofcessed the airborne by the Sentinel-1 C-band radar Toolbo [50x]. SNAP As no [54]. polarimetric The pre-processing calibration steps was performedconsist of thermal on the SARnoise data, removal, only theradiometric backscatter calibration, coefficients terrain of the correction four polarimetric using Shuttle channels Radar (VV, Topography VH, HV, andMission HH) (SRTM) are available. Version In this3.0 regard,Global the1 arc data second is not dataset suitable (SRTMGL1) for eigen- and and model-based converting polarimetricbackscatter values decomposition to decibels methods (dB) using without log furtherscaling processing.[55]. Additionally, The data speckle is provided filtering as 0 Singlewas performed Look Complex using (SLC)a focalσ medianin NetCDF filter filewith format. a kernel size of 3 by 3 pixels.
FigureFigure 3.3. CessnaCessna C208C208 carryingcarrying the SARSense radar setup.setup. The top top left left and and bottom bottom right right antennas antennas areare forfor L-band,L-band, thethe bottombottom leftleft andand toptop rightright antennas antennas for for C-band. C-band.
TableThe 2. Description quad-pol of (VV, the VH,SARSense HV, andC- and HH) L-band C-band radar SARsystem. sensor, used microstrip radio frequency (RF) antennas at a center frequency of 5400 MHz and transmitting a bandwidth Parameter C-Band L-Band of 200 MHz, a pulse repetition frequency of 1.89 KHz. The data were sampled at 50 MHz Antenna Geometry (cm) 32 × 13 33 × 33, 33 × 66 (Table2). The global geolocation accuracy in cross-range is 3.06 m and in slant-range 2.92 m based on averageAltitude displacement (m) as opposed to corner reflectors. 1620 The mean Noise Equivalent Sigma ZeroVelocity (NESZ) (Kn) was calculated over a body of standing ~130 water body in the north of everyNominal scene and look is − angle27.6 dB.(°) The quad-pol L-band SAR sensor 45 also used microstrip RF antennas and theMode same transmission parametersFrequency Modulated as the C-band. Continuous However, Wave-Full-Polar the transmission bandwidthPeak was Power limited (W) by the German authorities (Bundesnetzagentur) 3–10 to 50 MHz. For the datesActual 19, 21, PRF 25, and(kHz) 27 of June, the center frequency was 1.89 1400 MHz, whereas for the 8 andSampling 9 of August, frequency the center (MHz) frequency was 1300 MHz. The 50global geolocation accuracy in cross-range is 3.05 m and in slant-range 3.01 m based on the average displacement of Center frequency (MHz) 5400 1400/1300 corner reflectors. The mean NESZ is −34.8 dB and was computed on the same water body Transmitted bandwidth (MHz) 200 50 as the C-band. Azimuth bandwidth (MHz) 100 Beamwidth (Azim. × Elev.) (°) 10 × 35 40 × 40, 20 × 40 Ground range resolution (m) 0.9–1.3 3.6–5.2 Range pixel spacing (m) 1 Azimuth pixel spacing (m) 1 Incidence angle range (°) 35–55
Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 825 7 of 29
Table 2. Description of the SARSense C- and L-band radar system.
Parameter C-Band L-Band Antenna Geometry (cm) 32 × 13 33 × 33, 33 × 66 Altitude (m) 1620 Velocity (Kn) ~130 Nominal look angle (◦) 45 Mode Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave-Full-Polar Peak Power (W) 3–10 Actual PRF (kHz) 1.89 Sampling frequency (MHz) 50 Center frequency (MHz) 5400 1400/1300 Transmitted bandwidth (MHz) 200 50 Azimuth bandwidth (MHz) 100 Beamwidth (Azim. × Elev.) (◦) 10 × 35 40 × 40, 20 × 40 Ground range resolution (m) 0.9–1.3 3.6–5.2 Range pixel spacing (m) 1 Azimuth pixel spacing (m) 1 Incidence angle range (◦) 35–55
3.2. Sentinel-1 C-Band SAR The satellites Sentinel-1 A and Sentinel-1 B are imaging the Earth with a C-band SAR instrument using a center frequency of 5400 MHz. Sharing the same orbital plane, the two satellites have a combined exact revisit time of six days, being able to map the Earth´s surface independently from weather conditions and during both day and night time [51,52]. For the period from June 2019 to August 2019 a total of 58 Sentinel-1A/B dual-polarized (VV + VH) scenes in ascending and descending mode in Interferometric Wide-Swath Mode (IW) and Ground Range Detected High Resolution (GRDH) format [53] were acquired. To obtain the highest possible number of scenes, four different orbits were used, resulting in alternating incidence angles (Desc.: 43.1◦, Asc.: 30.1◦, Desc.: 34.6◦, Asc.: 40.1◦). The IW Mode captures three-sub-swaths, combining it into a 250 km swath with a spatial resolution of 5 m by 20 m by using Terrain Observation with Progressive Scans SAR (TOPSAR). For GRDH, the resolution is resampled into a 10 m by 10 m pixel spacing. The data was obtained using the Google Earth Engine (GEE) web platform, already being pre-processed by the Sentinel-1 Toolbox SNAP [54]. The pre-processing steps consist of thermal noise removal, radiometric calibration, terrain correction using Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Version 3.0 Global 1 arc second dataset (SRTMGL1) and converting backscatter values to decibels (dB) using log scaling [55]. Additionally, speckle filtering was performed using a focal median filter with a kernel size of 3 by 3 pixels.
3.3. ALOS-2 L-Band SAR Six dual-polarized (HH + HV) scenes of ALOS-2 in Stripmap Fine Mode (SM3) with a range resolution of 9.1 m and azimuth resolution of 5.3 m for the period from June 2019 to August 2019 were selected, with a revisit time of two to seven days. The scenes were recorded from two ascending and one descending orbit with an incidence angle of 34◦ and 35◦ (ascending) as well as 37◦ (descending) at the Selhausen test site. The Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR-2) sensor, operating with a center frequency of 1257.5 MHz and in Stripmap Fine Mode data is captured at 28 MHz bandwidth with a swath width of 70 km. The SLC data, at processing level 1.1, was provided by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) in cooperation with ESA. For further analysis, the data was radiometrically calibrated, resampled to ground range resolution of 10 m by 10 m, speckle filtered (3 by 3 pixels) using a focal median filter and geolocated using the ESA toolbox SNAP. A visual comparison between the C- and L-band air- and space borne data are displayed in Figure4. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 28
3.3. ALOS-2 L-Band SAR Six dual-polarized (HH + HV) scenes of ALOS-2 in Stripmap Fine Mode (SM3) with a range resolution of 9.1 m and azimuth resolution of 5.3 m for the period from June 2019 to August 2019 were selected, with a revisit time of two to seven days. The scenes were recorded from two ascending and one descending orbit with an incidence angle of 34° and 35° (ascending) as well as 37° (descending) at the Selhausen test site. The Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR-2) sensor, operating with a center fre- quency of 1257.5 MHz and in Stripmap Fine Mode data is captured at 28 MHz bandwidth with a swath width of 70 km. The SLC data, at processing level 1.1, was provided by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) in cooperation with ESA. For further analy- sis, the data was radiometrically calibrated, resampled to ground range resolution of 10 m by 10 m, speckle filtered (3 by 3 pixels) using a focal median filter and geolocated using Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 825 the ESA toolbox SNAP. A visual comparison between the C- and L-band8 of 29 air- and space borne data are displayed in Figure 4.
FigureFigure 4. 4.Comparison Comparison of airborne of airborne C- and L-band C- and data L-band with Sentinel-1 data with and Sentinel-1 ALOS-2 over and the SelhausenALOS-2 over the Sel- testhausen site for test the site 21/22 for June. the 21/22 June. 3.4. UASs 3.4. InUASs the SARSense campaign, multiple UAS flights were performed, covering an area of 2 0.85 kmIn. the RGB SARSense images were campaign, captured by amultiple Mavic Pro UAS as flights well as 5-channelwere performed, multispectral covering an area and thermal infrared measurements were taken by respectively a Micasense RedEdge-M andof 0.85 a FLIR km². VUE RGB Pro Rimages 640 sensor were mounted captured on aby DJI a M600 Mavic UAS Pro (Figure UAS5 ).as The well images as 5-channel multi- werespectral georeferenced and thermal using AeroPointsinfrared measurements GPS ground control were devices taken [56 ].by The respectively individual a Micasense flightRedEdge-M plans were and created a FLIR using VUE DJI GroundStation Pro R 640 sensor Pro. mounted on a DJI M600 UAS (Figure 5). TheThe images Mavic were Pro UAS georeferenced carries a 12.7 megapixels using AeroPoints RGB camera GPS with ground an optical control distortion devices [56]. The ofindividual less than 1.5% flight on plans a 3-axis were gimbal crea [57ted]. During using theDJI image GroundStation acquisition, thePro. drone had an average flight speed of 40 km/h, covering the whole test site with a flight altitude of 120 m,The resulting Mavic in Pro a spatial UAS resolution carries <4a 12.7 cm. Usingmegapixels AgiSoft MetaShape,RGB camera orthomosaics with an foroptical distortion theof less whole than Selhausen 1.5% on test a site 3-axis were gimbal created from[57]. aDuring total of 580the nadir image images, acquisition, with a front the drone had an overlapaverage of flight 80% and speed side overlapof 40 km/h, of 60%. covering In total, fivethe RGBwhole orthomosaics test site with were a created, flight altitude of 120 documentingm, resulting the in Selhausena spatial testresolution site over the<4 cm. whole Using SARSense AgiSoft campaign MetaShape, period. During orthomosaics for the the standard procedure to generate orthomosaics, a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) was generatedwhole Selhausen from RGB test data site by a were structure-from-motion created from a procedure.total of 580 Characteristic nadir images, features with a front over- werelap of identified 80% and in multiple side overlap images andof 60%. by this In photogrammetric total, five RGB multi-view orthomosaics approach were the created, docu- 3Dmenting position the and Selhausen orientation oftest each site feature over is the retrieved. whole The SARSense resulting 3D campaign point cloud period. can During the thenstandard be converted procedure into a DEM,to generate which is providedorthomosaics, here with a a spatialDigital resolution Elevation of <8 Model cm. (DEM) was The DJI M600 was flown at an altitude of 120 m at 31 km/h with both sensors (multispectral and thermal infrared) taking nadir images every second, with the GPS position data being stored in every individual image. The FLIR VUE Pro R 640 is a radiometric thermal infrared camera with a spectral range between 7.5 to 13.5 µm, an accuracy of (±) 5 ◦C as well as a thermal sensitivity of 0.05 ◦C[58]. Equipped with a 13 mm lens, the camera has a 45◦ by 37◦ field of view with a sensor resolution of 640 by 512 pixels. The images were combined into an orthomosaic with Pix4D resulting in a spatial resolution of <40 cm. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 29
generated from RGB data by a structure-from-motion procedure. Characteristic features were identified in multiple images and by this photogrammetric multi-view approach the 3D position and orientation of each feature is retrieved. The resulting 3D point cloud can then be converted into a DEM, which is provided here with a spatial resolution of <8 cm. The DJI M600 was flown at an altitude of 120 m at 31 km/h with both sensors (multispectral and thermal infrared) taking nadir images every second, with the GPS position data being stored in every individual image. The FLIR VUE Pro R 640 is a radiometric thermal infrared camera with a spectral range between 7.5 to 13.5 µm, an accuracy of (±) 5 °C as well as a thermal sensitivity of 0.05 °C [58]. Equipped with a 13 mm lens, the camera has a 45° by 37° field of view with a sensor resolution of 640 by 512 pixels. The images were combined into an orthomosaic with Pix4D resulting in a spatial resolution of <40 cm. The Micasense RedEdge-M is a 5-channel multispectral sensor, also containing a red edge and near infrared (NIR) bands besides the RGB bands. The spectral range of the individual bands can be found in Table 3. Furthermore, it is equipped with a downwelling light sensor, measuring the ambient light for each band to correct lighting changes during the flight, e.g., due to changing cloud cover. The sensor was calibrated before and after Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 825 every flight using the standard calibration panel. The data was combined to an 119 ofcm 29 resolution orthomosaic for each date with AgiSoft Metashape.
Figure 5. Normalized Difference Red-Edge (NDRE) index measured by the Micasense RedEdge-M multispectral sensor (left) and surface temperature (◦C) measured by the FLIR VUE Pro 640 thermal infrared camera (right) on the 27 June 2019. Figure 5. Normalized Difference Red-Edge (NDRE) index measured by the Micasense RedEdge-M multispectral sensor (left) and surface temperature (°C) measured by the FLIR VUE Pro 640 The Micasense RedEdge-M is a 5-channel multispectral sensor, also containing a red thermal infrared camera (right) on the 27 June 2019. edge and near infrared (NIR) bands besides the RGB bands. The spectral range of the Tableindividual 3. Spectral bands band can information be found infor Table the Micasense3. Furthermore, RedEdge-M. it is equipped with a downwelling light sensor, measuring the ambient light for each band to correct lighting changes during the flight,Band e.g., Name due to changing Center cloud Wavelength cover. The sensor (nm) was calibrated Bandwidth before (nm) and after every flightBlue using the standard calibration475 panel. The data was combined 20 to an 11 cm resolution orthomosaic for each date with AgiSoft Metashape. Green 560 20 Table 3. SpectralRed band information for the Micasense668 RedEdge-M. 10 Red Edge 717 10 Band Name Center Wavelength (nm) Bandwidth (nm) NIRBlue 840 475 40 20 Green 560 20 Red 668 10 Red Edge 717 10 NIR 840 40
3.5. In Situ Measurements For the duration of the SARSense flight campaign, a large number of climate, soil, and vegetation parameters were measured, both from already installed operational stations and planned field sampling. Due to the complex soil texture and the presence of different crop types, a high number of in situ soil moisture measurements and plant samplings were conducted, simultaneously or close to the SAR recordings. At the same time, permanently installed measuring stations with a high temporal resolution provided continuose data for the entire period of the SARSense campaign (from June to August 2019) at selected locations. Thanks to the combination of these two datasets, both the temporal and spatial variability of meteorological, soil, and plant parameters could be captured satisfactorily.
3.5.1. Soil Moisture For the soil moisture measurements, a Hydra Probe II was used. It is a coaxial impedance dielectric sensor, measuring both components of the complex dielectric permit- tivity, allowing simultaneously measuring soil moisture and soil electrical conductivity (EC) [59]. The sensing volume is 5.7 cm by 3.0 cm, where 5.7 cm is the integrated soil moisture sensing depth. The accuracy for soil moisture is ±3%, for EC ± 0.005 S/m and Remote Sens. 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 28
soil water content in soil depths of 0.1 m, 0.3 m, and 0.5 m. The data from the fixed in- stalled TERENO measuring stations are publicly available and can be found at https://www.tereno.net/ddp.
3.5.2. Plant Sampling On the 25 of June, a total of 45 plant samples were taken for potato (F11), sugar beet (F04, F01, F47), wheat (F05, F22b, F08), barley (F33, F48b), rapeseed (F53), rye (F27, F49) and corn (F03, F24b, F06). On the 7 August, a total of 22 samples were taken for potato (F11), sugar beet (F04, F01, F47) and corn (F03, F24b, F06), where the other crops were already harvested. Within a 40 cm by 40 cm square, whole plants were harvested at each location and a representative plant was selected and sealed within a plastic bag for later laboratory measures. Furthermore, for the determination of the Chlorophyll and Carote- noid content, fresh green leaves were sampled. Using a leaf tissue puncher, five to ten leaf disks with a diameter of 9 mm were randomly punched out of the upper green leaves of a plant, each weighting between 10 mg and 20 mg. The leaf disks were transferred into 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and transported to the FZJ. On the field site, the mean plant height (five plants at each location), the development stage of the plants according to the German Federal Biological Research Centre for Agri- culture and Forestry, Federal Plant Variety Office and Chemical Industry (BBCH), LAI Remoteand Sens. 2021chlorophyll, 13, 825 content were measured. The LAI was determined using a SunScan plant 10 of 29 canopy analyzer, which measures the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in vegeta- tion canopies with a 1 m probe, compared to the reference PAR measured by a BF5 reference PAR sunlight sensor for[66]. soil The temperature chlorophyll± 0.1 content◦C. As demonstratedwas measured in previousby a SPAD-502Plus research, the HydraChlo- Probe rophyll meter, calculatingmeasurements the mean are of precise ten measurements and accurate in at fluids each with location known [67]. dielectric properties and Within three dayshighly from correlated the field with sampling soil moisture,, the indicating sealed plant the potential samples of thewere instrument processed for quanti- tative measurement [60]. The mobile soil moisture measurements were performed using in the laboratory, determiningthe Mobile Hydrathe LAI, Set, fresh which total is equipped biomass, with dry an internalweight, GPS and device canopy and water smartphone content for leaves andconnection. stems separately. The measured Here variables, the atfresh the fieldsweight are of sampling each plant time, coordinates,is deter- soil mined, and the LAI istemperature, calculated soil consecutively moisture, bulk using EC raw, a Li-3200 bulk EC Area TC (thermal Meter correction), (LiCor, Lincoln, pore water EC, NE, USA). After leavingand real the and plants imaginary in a partdrying of the oven dielectric at 65 permittivity °C for five (raw to andsix TC).days, In total,the dry more than 5000 measurements were collected with four Mobile Hydra Probe II during the airborne weight was measured,SAR and acquisition the canopy dates water for the content whole Selhausen was determined area (Figure by6). subtracting In addition todry the soil weight from the freshparameters, weight. the plant height was sampled and logged at these locations as well.
FigureFigure 6. 6.Soil Soil moisture moisture sampling sampling points forpoints the 21 for June the (left) 21 andJune plant (left) sampling and plant points sampling for the 25 June points and 7for August the (right). 25 June and 7 August (right).For the 27 June and 8 August, a cosmic-ray neutron sensing rover was used for measuring soil moisture. With the mobile sensor, a large spatial area can be covered 4. Methods within a short time, whereby the individual measurements represent an area of ~8 to In order to provide18 hectare recommendations [61] and do not represent for the ROSE-L a temporal satellite course. Asmission, the measurement the potential uncertainty of soil moisture depends on the number of measured neutrons, highly sensitive devices of L-band SAR dataare for needed soil surface [62]. Therefore, and vegetation the Forschungszentrum parameter retrieval Jülich (FZJ) and cosmic its synergy rover uses an 10 effects through potentialarray combination of 9 detector units, with each C-band holding SAR four dataBF from3-filled existing tubes, summing missions up like to a total Sentinel-1 need to beof evaluated. 36 cosmic-ray Special neutron focu probes.s lies The on presentedthe use of data L- reliesand C-band on five detector SAR data units that for soil moisture retrievalwere measuring at high resolution epithermal neutronsas well atas the the time, added three value of which of wereL-band mounted SAR verticallyin in the car, whereas two were mounted horizontally. The recording interval was set to 10 seconds. [63]. The measurement of soil moisture with cosmic-ray neutron sensing relies on the inverse dependence of above-ground epithermal neutrons (energy range from ~0.2 eV to 100 keV) on the environmental water content in a footprint of 130 m to 240 m radius and 15 cm to 83 cm penetration depth [61]. The measured neutron counts were converted to soil moisture using the approach developed by Desilets et al. [64], which requires the calibration of the measured epithermal neutron intensity to soil moisture within the footprint. This was done during earlier experiments using the measurement from four other cosmic-ray neutron probes stationed in the Rur catchment [35]. In addition, a permanent SoilNet wireless sensor network consisting of five profiles (depths of −0.01, −0.05, −0.1, −0.2, −0.5, and −1 m) is operated in field F11 to measure in situ soil moisture and temperature with SMT100 sensors (Trübner Precision Instru- ments) [35]. The SMT100 sensor measures the transit time of an electromagnetic pulse in a 30 mm wide and 120 mm long transmission line to determine soil moisture. Due to sensor specific calibration the accuracy is for soil moisture is 1–2 Vol.% and for soil temperature ± 0.2 ◦C[65]. Due to the dry conditions, field F11 was irrigated multiple times by the farmer Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 825 11 of 29
during the SARSense campaign period, with an irrigation also taking place on 27 June during an airborne SAR recording. Furthermore, 18 lysimeters (UMS GmbH) are installed on field F10, near real-time measuring the soil matrix potential, soil temperature, soil heat flux and soil water content in soil depths of 0.1 m, 0.3 m, and 0.5 m. The data from the fixed installed TERENO measuring stations are publicly available and can be found at https://www.tereno.net/ddp.
3.5.2. Plant Sampling On the 25 of June, a total of 45 plant samples were taken for potato (F11), sugar beet (F04, F01, F47), wheat (F05, F22b, F08), barley (F33, F48b), rapeseed (F53), rye (F27, F49) and corn (F03, F24b, F06). On the 7 August, a total of 22 samples were taken for potato (F11), sugar beet (F04, F01, F47) and corn (F03, F24b, F06), where the other crops were already harvested. Within a 40 cm by 40 cm square, whole plants were harvested at each location and a representative plant was selected and sealed within a plastic bag for later laboratory measures. Furthermore, for the determination of the Chlorophyll and Carotenoid content, fresh green leaves were sampled. Using a leaf tissue puncher, five to ten leaf disks with a diameter of 9 mm were randomly punched out of the upper green leaves of a plant, each weighting between 10 mg and 20 mg. The leaf disks were transferred into 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and transported to the FZJ. On the field site, the mean plant height (five plants at each location), the development stage of the plants according to the German Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Federal Plant Variety Office and Chemical Industry (BBCH), LAI and chlorophyll content were measured. The LAI was determined using a SunScan plant canopy analyzer, which measures the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in vegetation canopies with a 1 m probe, compared to the reference PAR measured by a BF5 reference PAR sunlight sensor [66]. The chlorophyll content was measured by a SPAD-502Plus Chlorophyll meter, calculating the mean of ten measurements at each location [67]. Within three days from the field sampling, the sealed plant samples were processed in the laboratory, determining the LAI, fresh total biomass, dry weight, and canopy water content for leaves and stems separately. Here, the fresh weight of each plant is determined, and the LAI is calculated consecutively using a Li-3200 Area Meter (LiCor, Lincoln, NE, USA). After leaving the plants in a drying oven at 65 ◦C for five to six days, the dry weight was measured, and the canopy water content was determined by subtracting dry weight from the fresh weight.
4. Methods In order to provide recommendations for the ROSE-L satellite mission, the potential of L-band SAR data for soil surface and vegetation parameter retrieval and its synergy effects through potential combination with C-band SAR data from existing missions like Sentinel-1 need to be evaluated. Special focus lies on the use of L- and C-band SAR data for soil moisture retrieval at high resolution as well as the added value of L-band SAR in addressing current EO measurement gaps (soil moisture, vegetation biomass, etc.) and enhanced continuity together with other missions such as Sentinel-1. The first step is to compare the airborne data with the corresponding satellite data for each flight track to assess their temporal consistency and to estimate the influence of the makeshift calibration (see Section 3.1). In the next step, the sensitivity of L- and C- band to in situ measured changes of soil moisture, plant height, vegetation water content (VWC) as well as UAS- based Normalized Difference RedEdge index (NDRE) for potato, sugar beet, wheat, and barley fields within the Selhausen test site is analyzed.
4.1. In Situ Pre-Processing In the first step, the in situ data was filtered, using the reliability flag (Data_reliability = 0) as well as soil moisture values with 0.0 vol.% were masked as Not a Number (NaN) Remote Sens. 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 28
addressing current EO measurement gaps (soil moisture, vegetation biomass, etc.) and enhanced continuity together with other missions such as Sentinel-1. The first step is to compare the airborne data with the corresponding satellite data for each flight track to assess their temporal consistency and to estimate the influence of the makeshift calibration (see Section 3.1). In the next step, the sensitivity of L- and C- band to in situ measured changes of soil moisture, plant height, vegetation water content (VWC) as well as UAS- based Normalized Difference RedEdge index (NDRE) for potato, sugar beet, wheat, and barley fields within the Selhausen test site is analyzed.
4.1. In Situ Pre-Processing Remote Sens. 2021, 13In, 825 the first step, the in situ data was filtered, using the reliability flag (Data_reliability 12 of 29 = 0) as well as soil moisture values with 0.0 vol.% were masked as Not a Number (NaN) and not considered in further analysis. The in situ soil moisture data was collected as up to three individualand measurements not considered close in further to each analysis. other The (within in situ 1 soil m²) moisture for each data measuring was collected as up location. Therefore,to threemeasurements individual at measurements related points close were to eachaveraged, other (withinand a new 1 m2 point) for each was measuring defined, located inlocation. the center Therefore, of these measurements points. To extract at related the pointspolarimetric were averaged, SAR data and at athese new point was locations, the pointsdefined, were locatedbuffered in theto a center circle of with these an points. 11 m Toradius. extract the polarimetric SAR data at these locations, the points were buffered to a circle with an 11 m radius.
4.2. Sigma Nought 4.2. Sigma Nought The airborne backscatteringThe airborne intensity backscattering 𝜎 was intensity calculatedσ0 was from calculated the SLC from data the by: SLC data by: