Download The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Back to the the Future? 07> Probing the Kuiper Belt
SpaceFlight A British Interplanetary Society publication Volume 62 No.7 July 2020 £5.25 SPACE PLANES: back to the the future? 07> Probing the Kuiper Belt 634089 The man behind the ISS 770038 Remembering Dr Fred Singer 9 CONTENTS Features 16 Multiple stations pledge We look at a critical assessment of the way science is conducted at the International Space Station and finds it wanting. 18 The man behind the ISS 16 The Editor reflects on the life of recently Letter from the Editor deceased Jim Beggs, the NASA Administrator for whom the building of the ISS was his We are particularly pleased this supreme achievement. month to have two features which cover the spectrum of 22 Why don’t we just wing it? astronautical activities. Nick Spall Nick Spall FBIS examines the balance between gives us his critical assessment of winged lifting vehicles and semi-ballistic both winged and blunt-body re-entry vehicles for human space capsules, arguing that the former have been flight and Alan Stern reports on his grossly overlooked. research at the very edge of the 26 Parallels with Apollo 18 connected solar system – the Kuiper Belt. David Baker looks beyond the initial return to the We think of the internet and Moon by astronauts and examines the plan for a how it helps us communicate and sustained presence on the lunar surface. stay in touch, especially in these times of difficulty. But the fact that 28 Probing further in the Kuiper Belt in less than a lifetime we have Alan Stern provides another update on the gone from a tiny bleeping ball in pioneering work of New Horizons. -
SP-717 Cryosat 2013
ANALYSIS OF THE IN-FLIGHT INJECTION OF THE LISA PATHFINDER TEST-MASS INTO A GEODESIC Daniele Bortoluzzi (1,2) on behalf of the LISA Pathfinder Collaboration(*), Davide Vignotto (1), Andrea Zambotti (1), Ingo Köker(3), Hans Rozemeijer(4), Jose Mendes(4), Paolo Sarra(5), Andrea Moroni(5), Paolo Lorenzi(5) (1) University of Trento, Department of Industrial Engineering, via Sommarive, 9 - 38123 Trento, Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (2) Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Application / INFN, Italy. (3) AIRBUS DS GmbH, Willy-Messerschmitt-Strasse 1 Ottobrunn, 85521, Germany, Email: [email protected] (4) European Space Operations Centre, European Space Agency, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email: [email protected], [email protected] (5) OHB Italia S.p.A., via Gallarate, 150 – 20151 Milano, Italy, Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (*) Full list and affiliations attached in the end of the document ABSTRACT surroundings housing. The sensing body, from the locked condition, has then to LISA Pathfinder is a mission that demonstrates some key be released into free-fall to start the in-flight operations; technologies for the measurement of gravitational waves. as a consequence, the release into free-fall of the proof The mission goal is to set two test masses (TMs) into mass is a critical aspect for these missions, since it is a purely geodesic trajectories. The grabbing positioning necessary step to start the science phase. Different and release mechanism (GPRM) grabs and releases each technologies are nowadays available to perform a release TM from any position inside its housing. -
Roll Calibration for Cryosat-2: a Comprehensive Approach
remote sensing Technical Note Roll Calibration for CryoSat-2: A Comprehensive Approach Albert Garcia-Mondéjar 1,* , Michele Scagliola 2 , Noel Gourmelen 3,4 , Jerome Bouffard 5 and Mònica Roca 1 1 isardSAT S.L., Barcelona Advanced Industry Park, 08042 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] 2 Aresys SRL, 20132 Milano, Italy; [email protected] 3 School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK; [email protected] 4 IPGS UMR 7516, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, 67000 Strasbourg, France 5 ESA ESRIN, 00044 Frascati, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: CryoSat-2 is the first satellite mission carrying a high pulse repetition frequency radar altimeter with interferometric capability on board. Across track interferometry allows the angle to the point of closest approach to be determined by combining echoes received by two antennas and knowledge of their orientation. Accurate information of the platform mispointing angles, in particular of the roll, is crucial to determine the angle of arrival in the across-track direction with sufficient accuracy. As a consequence, different methods were designed in the CryoSat-2 calibration plan in order to estimate interferometer performance along with the mission and to assess the roll’s contribution to the accuracy of the angle of arrival. In this paper, we present the comprehensive approach used in the CryoSat-2 Mission to calibrate the roll mispointing angle, combining analysis from external calibration of both man-made targets, i.e., transponder and natural targets. The roll calibration approach for CryoSat-2 is proven to guarantee that the interferometric measurements are exceeding the expected performance. -
Sentinel-3 Product Notice
Copernicus S3 Product Notice – Altimetry Mission S3 Sensor SRAL / MWR Product LAND L2 NRT, STC and NTC Product Notice ID S3A.PN-STM-L2L.10 Issue/Rev Date 16/07/2020 Version 1.1 This Product Notice was prepared by the S3 Mission Performance Centre Preparation and ESA experts Approval ESA Mission Management Summary This is a Product Notice (PN) for the Copernicus Sentinel-3A and Sentinel-3B Surface Topography Mission (STM) Level-2 Land products at Near Real Time (NRT), Short Time Critical (STC) and Non Time Critical (NTC) timeliness. The Notice describes the STM current status, product quality and limitations, and product availability status. © ESA page 1 / 16 Processing Baseline S3A S3B Processing Baseline • Processing Baseline: 2.68 • Processing Baseline: 1.42 • • SR_1 IPF version: 06.18 SR_1 IPF version: 06.18 • MW_1 IPF version: 06.11 IPFs version • MW_1 IPF version: 06.11 • • SM_2 IPF version: 06.19 SM_2 IPF version: 06.19 Current Operational Processing Baseline IPF IPF Version In OPE since S3A SR1 06.18 Land Centres: NRT mode : 2020-07-09 STC mode : 2020-07-09 NTC mode : 2020-07-09 S3A MW1 06.11 Land Centres: NRT mode : 2020-01-21 STC mode : 2020-01-21 NTC mode : 2020-01-21 S3A SM2 06.19 Land Centres: NRT mode : 2020-07-09 STC mode : 2020-07-09 NTC mode : 2020-07-09 S3B SR1 06.18 Land Centres: NRT mode : 2020-07-09 STC mode : 2020-07-09 NTC mode : 2020-07-09 S3B MW1 06.11 Land Centres: NRT mode : 2020-01-21 STC mode : 2020-01-21 NTC mode : 2020-01-21 S3B SM2 06.19 Land Centres: NRT mode : 2020-07-09 STC mode : 2020-07-09 NTC mode : 2020-07-09 © ESA page 2 / 16 Status of the Processing Baseline S3A The Processing Baseline (PB) for Copernicus Sentinel-3A STM products associated to this PN is reported above. -
About the Consistency Between Envisat and Cryosat-2 Radar Freeboard Retrieval Over Antarctic Sea Ice
The Cryosphere, 10, 1415–1425, 2016 www.the-cryosphere.net/10/1415/2016/ doi:10.5194/tc-10-1415-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. About the consistency between Envisat and CryoSat-2 radar freeboard retrieval over Antarctic sea ice Sandra Schwegmann1, Eero Rinne2, Robert Ricker1, Stefan Hendricks1, and Veit Helm1 1Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany 2Finnish Meteorological Institute, Marine Research, Erik Palménin aukio 1, 00560 Helsinki, Finland Correspondence to: Sandra Schwegmann ([email protected]) Received: 26 June 2015 – Published in The Cryosphere Discuss.: 16 September 2015 Revised: 6 June 2016 – Accepted: 8 June 2016 – Published: 8 July 2016 Abstract. Knowledge about Antarctic sea-ice volume and its 1 Introduction changes over the past decades has been sparse due to the lack of systematic sea-ice thickness measurements in this Over the last 3 decades, sea-ice extent (SIE) in the Arctic remote area. Recently, first attempts have been made to de- has decreased and submarine ice draft measurements indi- velop a sea-ice thickness product over the Southern Ocean cate that also sea-ice volume is declining (Rothrock et al., from space-borne radar altimetry and results look promising. 1999, 2008; Lindsay and Schweiger, 2015). In the Antarctic, Today, more than 20 years of radar altimeter data are poten- in contrast, SIE is increasing, but little is known about the tially available for such products. However, the characteris- changes in sea-ice volume. This is due to the lack of system- tics of individual radar types differ for the available altimeter atic sea-ice thickness measurements in the Southern Hemi- missions. -
Exploring the Benefits of Using Cryosat-2'S Cross-Track
JULY 2013 D I B A R B O U R E E T A L . 1511 Exploring the Benefits of Using CryoSat-2’s Cross-Track Interferometry to Improve the Resolution of Multisatellite Mesoscale Fields G. DIBARBOURE CLS, Ramonville St-Agne, France P. Y. LE TRAON IFREMER, Plouzane, France N. GALIN Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom (Manuscript received 7 August 2012, in final form 12 January 2013) ABSTRACT Sea surface height (SSH) measurements provided by pulse-limited radar altimeters are one-dimensional profiles along the satellite’s nadir track, with no information whatsoever in the cross-track direction. The anisotropy of resulting SSH profiles is the most limiting factor of mesoscale SSH maps that merge the 1D profiles. This paper explores the potential of the cross-track slope derived from the Cryosphere Satellite-2 (CryoSat- 2)’s synthetic aperture radar interferometry (SARin) mode to increase the resolution of mesoscale fields in the cross-track direction. Through idealized 1D simulations, this study shows that it is possible to exploit the dual SARin measurement (cross-track slope and SSH profile) in order to constrain mesoscale mapping in the cross-track direction. An error-free SSH slope allows a single SARin instrument to recover almost as much SSH variance as two coordinated altimeters. Noise-corrupted slopes can also be exploited to improve the mapping, and a break- through is observed for SARin errors ranging from 1 to 5 mrad for 150-km-radius features in strong currents, and 0.1–0.5 mrad for global mesoscale. -
Europe's Earth Observation, Satellite Navigation and Communications
Europe’s Earth Observation, Satellite Navigation and Communications Missions and Services for the benefit of the Arctic Inventory of current and future capabilities, their synergies and societal benefits Boniface, K., Gioia, C. Pozzoli, L., Diehl, T., Dobricic, S., Fortuny Guasch, J., Greidanus, H., Kliment, T., Kucera, J., Janssens- Maenhout, G., Soille, P., Strobl, P., and Wilson, J. 2021 EUR 30629 EN This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. For information on the methodology and quality underlying the data used in this publication for which the source is neither Eurostat nor other Commission services, users should contact the referenced source. The designations employed and the presentation of material on the maps do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Union concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Contact information Name: Karen Boniface Address: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate E: Space, Security and Migration Email: [email protected] Tel.: +39-0332-785295 EU Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC121206 EUR 30629 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-76-32079-1 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/270136 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021 © European Union, 2021 The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by the Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. -
An Operational Anthropogenic CO₂ Emissions Monitoring & Verification Support Capacity
CO emissions Monitoring & Verification Support Capacity emissions Monitoring & Verification 2 An Operational Anthropogenic CO₂ Emissions An Operational Anthropogenic CO2 Monitoring & Verification Support Capacity Space CO2 TF-B report European Commission Directorate-General for Communication Publications 1049 Brussels BELGIUM Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 ISBN 978-92-79-72101-4 doi 10.2760/08644 © European Union, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium PRINTED ON ELEMENTAL CHLORINE-FREE BLEACHED PAPER (ECF) EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Directorate I — Space Policy, Copernicus and Defence Unit I.2 — Copernicus Contacts: Bernard Pinty & Hugo Zunker E-mails: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels An Operational Anthropogenic CO₂ Emissions Monitoring & Verification Support Capacity Baseline Requirements, Model Components and Functional Architecture Report from the CO₂ Monitoring Task Force - sub-task B Cite as: Pinty B., G. Janssens-Maenhout, M. Dowell, H. Zunker, T. Brunhes, P. Ciais, D. Dee, H. Denier van der Gon, H. Dolman, M. Drinkwater, R. Engelen, M. Heimann, K. Holmlund, R. Husband, A. Kentarchos, Y. Meijer, P. Palmer and M. Scholze (2017) An Operational Anthropogenic CO₂ Emissions Monitoring & Verification Support capacity - Baseline Requirements, Model Components and Functional Architecture, doi: 10.2760/39384, European Commission Joint Research Centre, EUR 28736 EN. -
ESA Propulsion Lab at ESTEC
ESA Propulsion Lab at ESTEC IEPC-2009-236 Presented at the 31st International Electric Propulsion Conference, University of Michigan • Ann Arbor, Michigan • USA September 20 – 24, 2009 J. Gonzalez del Amo*, G. Saccoccia† and P.-E. Frigot‡ European Space Agency, ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands Abstract: Electric and chemical propulsion systems are very important for spacecraft applications. Performance and reliability of propulsion systems are two main areas that have to be demonstrated to any space project. Europe is developing several types of electric and chemical thrusters for application to many satellites. Design, manufacturing and testing of such thrusters is a complex activity that requires a great effort. Full characterisation, qualification, acceptance and plume interaction tests are mandatory in the full assessment of these technologies. The ESA Propulsion Laboratory (EPL) is an operational facility at ESTEC in the spacecraft propulsion testing field. The EPL provides test services to the ESA Propulsion and Aerothermodynamics Division, which is responsible at European Space Agency for R&D activities and support to projects in the areas of chemical propulsion, electric and advanced propulsion and aerothermodynamics. When applicable, the EPL also provides technical advice and support to external organisations for subjects related to propulsion testing and test facilities. A laboratory dedicated to electric propulsion exists at ESTEC since early 1980s. In the last years, the activities of the laboratory, under project request, have been expanded to chemical propulsion (cold gas and other non-toxic propellants). During 2004, EPL has obtained dual ISO 17025 accreditation and ISO 9001 certification. In 2007 the EPL changed its physical location and several tests were performed in order to validate the correct functioning of the facilities This paper will describe the EPL organisation, facilities and activities after the physical relocation. -
Cryosat-2 for Inland Water Applications – Potential, Challenges and Future Prospects
Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 08, 2021 CryoSat-2 for Inland Water Applications – Potential, Challenges and Future Prospects Kittel, Cecile Marie Margaretha; Jiang, Liguang; Schneider, R.; Andersen, Ole Baltazar; Nielsen, Karina; Bauer-Gottwein, Peter Published in: 25 years of progress in radar altimetry symposium - abstract book Publication date: 2018 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Kittel, C. M. M., Jiang, L., Schneider, R., Andersen, O. B., Nielsen, K., & Bauer-Gottwein, P. (2018). CryoSat-2 for Inland Water Applications – Potential, Challenges and Future Prospects. In 25 years of progress in radar altimetry symposium - abstract book (pp. 85-85). European Space Agency. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. → 25 YEARS OF PROGRESS IN RADAR ALTIMETRY SYMPOSIUM © ESA 2018 ABSTRACT BOOK 24–29 September 2018 | Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island Azores Archipelago, Portugal ABSTRACT BOOK 25 Years of Progress in Radar Altimetry Workshop 24-29 September 2018 Ponta Delgada Azores Last update: 19 October 2018 1 Table of Contents 2 Committees ............................................................................................................................................... -
ESA/ADMIN/ORG(2006)3, Rev.1 Director General’S Office Att.: Annex ---- Paris, 1 October 2006 Distribution: All Staff (Original: English)
ESA ESA/ADMIN/ORG(2006)3, rev.1 Director General’s Office Att.: Annex ---- Paris, 1 October 2006 Distribution: all staff (Original: English) Directorate of Earth Observation Programmes (D/EOP) 1. INTRODUCTION This Instruction describes the role and responsibilities of the Director of Earth Observation Programmes. It outlines the revised organisational set-up of the Directorate and sets out its terms of reference. 2. ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES The Directorate of Earth Observation Programmes is a Programme Directorate within the ESA matrix structure. Under the direct authority of the Director General, the Director of Earth Observation Programmes is responsible for the strategy for the Earth Observation sector, consistent with the European Strategy for Space and taking into account the worldwide environment and its main actors: space agencies, manufacturing and service industry, commercial operators of satellites, public and private stakeholders and customers. The Director of Earth Observation Programmes is in charge of preparing the future by building up relevant proposals for new programmes, taking into consideration the industrial policy of the Agency. The Director of Earth Observation Programmes is responsible for the implementation of all ESA programmes in Earth Observation. Following the Director General's decision and in conformity with the provisions of ESA/ADMIN/ORG(2003)2 outlining the role and responsibilities of the Head of Establishment, the Director of Earth Observation Programmes is the Head of Establishment at ESRIN. As such, he is responsible for relations with the administrative authorities of the host country and for ensuring, at local level, that the terms of the Establishment Agreement are observed and applied by both ESA and those authorities. -
FLEX Bridge Study
FLEX/Sentinel‐3 Tandem Mission FLEX Bridge Study FINAL REPORT January 2016 ESA ESTEC Contract No. 4000112341/14/NL/FF/gp FLEX Bridge Study – Final Report – January 2016 ESA ESTEC Contract No. 4000112341/14/NL/FF/gp Gina H. Mohammed (P & M Technologies, Canada) (Chapters 1, 3, 4, 6-9) Roberto Colombo (University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy) (Ch. 2) Jose Moreno (University of Valencia, Spain) (Ch. 2, 5) Christiaan van der Tol (University of Twente, The Netherlands) (Ch. 4) Uwe Rascher - , Germany) (Ch. 3) Alexander Ač (Global Change Research Centre AS CR, Czech Republic) (Ch. 3) Luis Alonso (University of Valencia, Spain; and IBIMET-CNR, Italy) (Ch. 5) Marco Celesti (University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy) (Ch. 2) Sergio Cogliati (University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy) (Ch. 2) Alexander Damm (University of Zurich, Switzerland) (Ch. 2, 3) Dominic Fawcett (University of Zurich, Switzerland) (Ch. 2, 3) Jose Gomez-Dans (University College London and NERC/NCEO, United Kingdom) (Ch. 4) Claudio Henry (University of Zurich, Switzerland) (Ch. 3) Philip Lewis (University College London and NERC/NCEO, United Kingdom) (Ch. 4) Natasha MacBean (LSCE – L S C ’E v ) (Ch. 4) Federico Magnani (University of Bologna, Italy) (Ch. 4) Jacques Malaprade (University College London and NERC/NCEO, United Kingdom) (Ch. 4) Maria Matveeva - , Germany) (Ch. 3) Julie Olejníčková (Global Change Research Centre AS CR, Czech Republic) (Ch. 3) Dan Pernokis (P & M Technologies, Canada) (Ch. 4) Francisco Pinto - , Germany) (Ch. 3) Sabrina Raddi (University of Florence, Italy) (Ch. 4) Nastassia Rajh Vilfan (University of Twente, The Netherlands) (Ch. 4) Juan Pablo Rivera (University of Valencia, Spain) (Ch.