DOCSLIB.ORG

Statement of Evidence of Stephen Kenneth Brown on Behalf of Auckland Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statement of Evidence of Stephen Kenneth Brown on Behalf of Auckland Council IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of a Board of Inquiry appointed under s149J of the Resource Management Act 1991 to consider Notice of Requirements and applications for Resource Consent made by the New Zealand Transport Agency in relation to the EWL roading project in Auckland. STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF STEPHEN KENNETH BROWN ON BEHALF OF AUCKLAND COUNCIL LANDSCAPE & URBAN DESIGN 1 Brown NZ Ltd: EWL Statement April 2017 Application - East West Link (Final) 2017.docx Table of Contents: PAGE: Executive Summary …………………………………………………………… 3 Introduction and Experience ……………………………………………… 5 Code of Conduct ………………………………………………………………….. 8 Scope of Evidence ……………………………………………………………….. 8 PART 1.0: KEY ISSUES & FINDINGS …………………………………... 10 1.1 Onehunga At Present & The EWL proposals …………………... 10 1.2 Effects in Relation to Onehunga …………………………………….. 17 1.3 Mangere Inlet At Present ………………………………………………. 28 1.4 Mangere Inlet Effects ……………………………………………………. 31 1.5 Anns Creek …………………………………………………………………... 41 1.6 Hamlins Hill / Mutukaroa ……………………………………………… 46 1.7 Otahuhu Creek ……………………………………………………………… 58 1.8 Southern Motorway Margins & Otahuhu Interchange …….. 59 1.9 Summary of Findings …………………………………………………….. 62 PART 2.0: PROPOSED CONDITIONS …………………………………. 63 PART 3.0: RECOMMENDATIONS ………..…………………………….. 67 2 Brown NZ Ltd: EWL Statement April 2017 Application - East West Link (Final) 2017.docx EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This statement addresses the landscape and urban design effects of the proposed East West Link project. It is based on my previous analysis and review of the project in December 206 and January 2017, but also takes into account the review of the proposal by Auckland Council’s Urban Design Panel on March 6th 2017, as well as meetings with NZTA and its experts both and after the UDP presentation, and meetings with other Council experts after notification. My analysis addresses the EWL in terms of the following locations and features: § Onehunga town centre; § The Mangere Inlet coastline; § Anns Creek; § Hamlins Hill; § Otahuhu Creek; and the margins of the Southern Motorway and the Otahuhu Interchange. 2. The majority of this statement focuses on the first two of these areas – Onehunga and Mangere Inlet – as these are the locations most affected by the EWL and where there is also the greatest need for modification of the current EWL proposal in my assessment. 3. The proposed road corridor, together with its Neilson Street bridge over SH20 and trench, would have four key effects in relation to Onehunga: a) It would exacerbate the existing physical and perceived ‘severance’ of the town centre from its waterfront area – including the existing port and old Mangere Bridge. In this regard, Onehunga already suffers from the incursion by existing transport and power infrastructure, with the area around Gloucester Park / Te Hopua a Rangi Tuff Crater (ONF 46) and the Manukau Harbour’s margins criss-crossed by SH20, its various slip roads, and three major 110kV and 220kV transmission corridors. The proposed EWL would compound this ‘dissection’ of Onehunga and the separation of its harbour area from its town centre. 3 Brown NZ Ltd: EWL Statement April 2017 Application - East West Link (Final) 2017.docx b) Much of the area around the existing port is also blighted by a haphazard array of light to heavy industrial development and the port’s own, rather dilapidated state. The EWL, as currently proposed, would also compound these qualities, further diminishing any residual amenity values still found in the vicinity of Onehunga Wharf. c) It would further isolate Onehunga’s three key natural (or, at least, mostly natural) features: Te Hopua Crater, the recently redeveloped Onehunga Bay foreshore (Taumanu Reserve) and the Onehunga lagoon – on the opposite, inland, side of SH20. d) It would also reinforce the isolation of some of Onehunga’s key heritage features, notably Aotea Sea Scouts Hall (on Orpheus Drive and next to the Waikaraka Walkway), The Landing (on Onehunga Harbour Road), Shaldrick House (next to Onehunga Mall) and the original 1924 Onehunga Wharf (within the port area). 4. Down the northern coastline of Mangere Inlet, the EWL would involve reclamation, both for the proposed road corridor and to assist with creation of a new, more ‘natural’ coastal edge. While some benefits would be derived from this process, it would also, at a macro level, help to cement in place the current concentration of industrial activities along Mangere Inlet’s northern shoreline and, more specifically, it produce significant effects in relation to: a) The physical connectivity between Mangere Inlet and Onehunga’s hinterland; b) The ambience, character and values of Waikaraka Cemetery and Park; and c) Current recreational use of the Inlet’s margins – especially in relation to the current ‘shared path’ that extends from old Mangere Bridge through to Hugo Johnston Drive, providing more far reaching connections with Ambury Park, even Puketutu Island and the Otuataua Stonefields. 5. In addition, I am aware that Council’s coastal and ecological experts have concerns about the profile of the proposed ‘lava flows’ extending out into Mangere Inlet, while Council’s stormwater experts have also raised concerns about the elevation of the bunds framing proposed stormwater ponds. 4 Brown NZ Ltd: EWL Statement April 2017 Application - East West Link (Final) 2017.docx 6. I address all of these matters in my statement, from a landscape / urban design standpoint. In my opinion, all of the matters raised above require further design refinement and development of more effective mitigation measures before the EWL proposal might be regarded as acceptable from my professional point of view. 7. On the other hand, I have far fewer concerns in relation to the proposed EWL corridor and its effects on Anns Creek (including the lava flows of ONF 89), Hamlins Hill (ONF 38), Otahuhu Creek, the margins of the Southern Motorway and the Otahuhu Interchange. My statement addresses these findings and explains why I have reached these conclusions. INTRODUCTION & EXPERIENCE 8. My name is Stephen Kenneth Brown. I hold a Bachelor of Town Planning degree and a post-graduate Diploma of Landscape Architecture. I am a Fellow and past President of the New Zealand Institute of Landscape Architects, an Affiliate Member of the New Zealand Planning Institute, and have practised as a landscape architect for 35 years. During that period, the great majority of my professional practice has focussed on landscape assessment and planning. This has included evaluating the landscape, natural character and amenity effects associated with numerous projects, including: • Waterview Connection Project, NZ Transport Agency, 2009-12 Assessment of landscape, amenity and natural character effects. Management of a design team within Brown NZ developing the concept design for open space around the motorway corridors, including rearrangement of sport fields and reserves, the provision of new walkways, the location of realigned streams and new stormwater ponds, and the design of planting and the noise barriers next to SH20) and the Great North Rd Interchange. • Weiti River Crossing Review, 2000 & 2015 Evaluation of the effects of a proposed bridge over the Weiti Estuary and the coastal environment near Stillwater; subsequent review of the AEE assessment undertaken for the Weiti corridor in 2015. • Onehunga Foreshore Restoration Project, Auckland Council, 2011 5 Brown NZ Ltd: EWL Statement April 2017 Application - East West Link (Final) 2017.docx Peer review of the landscape, natural character, amenity and urban design effects associated with rehabilitation of the Onehunga foreshore. • Glenfield Rd Designations Review, 2004 Review of the effects of implementation of three Outline Plans Of Work and resource consent applications related to the widening of Glenfield Rd, an arterial route within North Shore City, including evaluation of impacts in respect of amenity, streetscape and open space values for North Shore City. • Lake Rd Designations Assessment, 2002 Detailed analysis of the effects associated with widening of Lake Rd, including impacts upon residential amenity, streetscape and open space values; and appraisal of mitigation measures. • Waitemata Harbour Crossing Options Assessment, Opus/Transit NZ, 2002-3 Evaluation of the visual and amenity effects of 9 harbour crossing options, including bridges, tunnels, submerged tubes, reclamations, ventilation and service structures, trenches and motorway interchanges. • Dominion Rd Transport Designation, Auckland City Council, 2000 Detailed analysis of the amenity and visual implications of proposed transport corridor designations, including road widening and LRT corridor deviations off Dominion Rd. • Tauranga Northern Arterial Review & Arbitration, 2000 Evaluation of the proposed northern arterial's implications utilising assessments prepared by LA4 and Priest Mansergh, followed by site visits, and provision of recommendations to Transit NZ, the Bay of Plenty Regional Council and Western Bay of Plenty District Council about the landscape mitigation measures that should be employed in conjunction with development of the arterial corridor • ALPURT B2 Waiwera River Crossing Review, Auckland Regional Council, 1999 Review of the effects of a proposed bridge and related roading developments on the Waiwera and Puhoi Estuary coastal environs. • Auckland International Airport Eastern Access Way Impact Assessment, Auckland International Airport, 1989-91 Appraisal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Letter Template
    ATTACHMENT 5 Geological Assessment (Tonkin & Taylor) Job No: 1007709 10 January 2019 McConnell Property PO Box 614 Auckland 1140 Attention: Matt Anderson Dear Matt Orakei ONF Assessment 1- 3 Purewa Rd, Meadowbank Introduction McConnell Property is proposing to undertake the development of a multi-story apartment building at 1 - 3 Purewa Road, Meadowbank. The property is located within an area covered by the Outstanding Natural Feature (ONF) overlay of the Auckland Unitary Plan. The overlay relates to the Orakei Basin volcano located to the west of the property. The ONF overlay requires consent for the earthworks and the proposed built form associated with the development of the site. McConnell Property has commissioned Tonkin & Taylor Ltd (T+T) to provide a geological assessment of the property with respect to both the ONF overlay and the geological characteristics of the property. The purpose of the assessment is to place the property in context of the significant geological features identified by the ONF overlay, and to assess the geological effects of the proposed development. Proposed Development The proposal (as shown in the architectural drawings appended to the application) is to remove the existing houses and much of the vegetation from the site, and to develop the site with a new four- storey residential apartment building with a single-level basement for parking. The development will involve excavation of the site, which will require cuts of up to approximately 6m below existing ground level (bgl). The cut depths vary across the site, resulting in the average cut depth being less than 6m bgl. Site Description The site is located at the end of the eastern arm of the ridgeline that encloses the Orakei Basin (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4 Mana Whenua
    The Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (notified 30 September 2013) Proposed track changes for council’s closing statement 22 July 2015 Sites highlighted green are recommended to be amendend to reflect accurate location on schedule and maps Sites highlighted orange are recommended to be deleted because location is not confirmed Sites highlighted grey are recommended to be deleted because Mana Whenua have not assigned values Sites highlighted red are recommended to be deleted because they are non-Māori or duplicates Sites highlighted blue are recommended to be deleted because unknown whether natural feature or archaeological PART 5 • APPENDICES» Appendix 4 Mana Whenua Appendix 4.2 Schedule of Ssites and places of value to Mana Whenua [all provisions in this appendix are: rcp/dp] NZAA Site Values ID CHI Number Location Te Haruhi Bay | Shakespear Regional Park | abcef ID 1 87 R10_699 Whangaparaoa Peninsula | Hauraki Gulf. Whangaparapara | Aotea Island | Great Barrier ID 2 502 S09_116 Island. | Hauraki Gulf | Auckland City Bluebell Point | Tawharanui Regional Park | bc ID 3 829 R09_235 Hauraki Gulf | Rodney | Auckland ID 4 1066 Q11_412 abcdef Parawai | Te Henga | Bethells Beach Rangiriri Creek | Capes Road | Pollok | Awhitu abcdef ID 5 1752 R12_799 Peninsula | Manukau Harbour ID 6 3832 R11_581 bc Papahinu | Pukaki Creek | Papatoetoe ID 7 3835 R11_591 bc Waokauri Creek | Pukaki Creek | Papatoetoe ID 8 3843 R11_599 abc Waokauri Creek | Papatoetoe ID 9 3845 R11_601 bc Waokauri Creek | Papatoetoe ID 10 3846 R11_603 bc Waokauri Creek | Papatoetoe
    [Show full text]
  • IN the MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and in THE
    IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a Board of Inquiry appointed under s149J of the Resource Management Act 1991 to consider Notice of Requirements and applications for Resource Consent made by the New Zealand Transport Agency in relation to the East West Link roading proposal in Auckland. STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE LEMAUNGA LYDIA SOSENE ON BEHALF OF THE MANGERE-OTAHUHU LOCAL BOARD CONTENTS CLAUSE PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 2. MOLB'S VIEWS ON THE PROPOSAL ............................................................................ 1 3. GENERAL ....................................................................................................................... 3 Lemaunga Sosene_ Board Member _ FINAL need signature - 29238877 v 1.DOC 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 My name is Lemauga Lydia Sosene. I am the Local board chairperson of the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board (MOLB or board). 1.2 The Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board (the Board) supports the proposed East- West Link development in principle, subject to some comments on specific matters set out below. 1.3 The Board also supports the general objective of this development, such as, improved access ways and facilities between SH20 and SH1 along the northern edge of the Mangere inlet and surrounding areas, including the Princes Street junction for vehicles, cyclists and pedestrian safety. 1.4 The East-West Link Connection development aligns with key transport priorities set in the Mangere-Otahuhu Board Plan’s outcome “A well- connected area”: Improving connections in our area through safer streets, quality public transport, cycle ways and greenways. to live in a place that is easy to travel around. This is important to the well- being of our community... crucial to delivering our economic aims of developing tourism and growing businesses in our area.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2013 1 Appendix 3.1: Schedule Of
    Draft Auckland Unitary Plan – March 2013 Appendix 3.1: Schedule of Outstanding Natural Features Introduction The following criteria are used to determine the contents of this schedule, and will be used to consider any proposed additions to it. a. the extent to which the landform feature or geological site contributes to the understanding of the geology or evolution of the biota in the region, New Zealand or the earth (includes type localities of rock formations, minerals and fossils) b. the rarity or unusual nature of the site or feature; c. the extent to which the feature or site is an outstanding representative example of the diversity of natural landforms and geological features in Auckland; d. the extent to which the landform or geological feature or site is a component of a recognisable group of geologically associated features; e. the extent to which the landform or geological feature or site contributes to the aesthetic value or visual legibility of the wider natural landscape; f. the community association with, or public appreciation of the values of the feature or site g. the potential value of the feature or site for public education; h. the potential value of the feature or site to provide additional understanding of the geological or biotic history of the region; i. the state of preservation of the feature or site; j. the extent to which a feature or site is associated with an historically important natural event, geologically related industry, or individual involved in earth science research k. the importance of the feature or site to Mana Whenua; l.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Volcanic Field Magmatism, Volcanism, and Hazard: a Review
    1 This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in New Zealand 2 Journal of Geology and Geophysics on 18 March 2020, available online: 3 http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00288306.2020.1736102 4 5 6 Auckland Volcanic Field magmatism, volcanism, and hazard: a review 7 8 9 Jenni L Hopkins*1, Elaine R Smid*2, Jennifer D Eccles2, Josh L Hayes3, Bruce W Hayward4, Lucy E McGee5, 10 Kasper van Wijk2, Thomas M Wilson3, Shane J Cronin2, Graham S Leonard6, Jan M Lindsay2, Karoly 11 Németh7, Ian E M Smith2 12 13 *Corresponding Author(s): [email protected] / [email protected] 14 15 1Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand 16 2 University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand 17 3 University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand 18 4 Geomarine Research, 19 Debron Ave, Remuera, Auckland, New Zealand 19 5 University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 20 6 GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand 21 7 Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand 22 23 24 25 26 27 Manuscript prepared for submission to the IAVCEI special issue of New Zealand Journal of Geology and 28 Geophysics 29 30 31 1 32 33 Keywords 34 intraplate, monogenetic volcanism, chronology, tephrochronology, volcanic hazard assessment, faulting, 35 magma ascent rates, geochemistry, eruption scenarios, New Zealand 2 36 Abstract 37 Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF) is a basaltic intraplate volcanic field in North Island, New Zealand, 38 upon which >1.6 million people live.
    [Show full text]
  • To View an Individual Route Map, Click on the Route Number
    Ngataringa Bayswater PROPOSED SERVICES Bay KEY SYMBOLS FREQUENT SERVICES LOCAL SERVICES PEAK PERIOD SERVICES Little Shoal Station or key connection point Birkenhead Bay Northwestern Northwest to Britomart via Crosstown 6a Crosstown 6 extension to 101 Pt Chevalier to Auckland University services Northwestern Motorway and Selwyn Village via Jervois Rd Northcote Cheltenham Rail Line Great North Rd To viewNorthcote an individualPoint route map, click on the route number (Passenger Service) Titirangi to Britomart via 106 Freemans Bay to Britomart Loop 209 Beach North Shore Northern Express routes New North Rd and Blockhouse Bay Stanley Waitemata service Train Station NX1, NX2 and NX3 138 Henderson to New Lynn via Mangere Town Centre to Ferries to Northcote, Point Harbour City LINK - Wynyard Quarter to Avondale Peninsula Wynyard Quarter via Favona, Auckland Harbour Birkenhead, West Harbour, North City Link 309X Bridge Beach Haven and Karangahape Rd via Queen St 187 Lynfield to New Lynn via Mangere Bridge, Queenstown Rd Ferries to West Harbour, Hobsonville Head Ferry Terminal Beach Haven and Stanley Bay (see City Centre map) Blockhouse Bay and Pah Rd (non stop Hobsonville Services in this Inner LINK - Inner loop via Parnell, Greenwoods Corner to Newmarket) Services to 191 New Lynn to Blockhouse Bay via North Shore - direction only Inner Link Newmarket, Karangahape Rd, Avondale Peninsula and Whitney St Panmure to Wynyard Quarter via Ferry to 701 Lunn Ave and Remuera Rd not part of this Ponsonby and Victoria Park 296 Bayswater Devonport Onehunga
    [Show full text]
  • Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard
    Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay1 and Graham Leonard2 1School of Environment & Institute of Earth Science and Engineering, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; [email protected] 2GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040 New Zealand; [email protected] IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 This report was prepared by IESE as part of the DEVORA Project. Disclaimer: While the information contained in this report is believed to be correct at the time of publication, the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and its working parties and agents involved in preparation and publication, do not accept any liability for its contents or for any consequences arising from its use. Copyright: This work is copyright of the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering. The content may be used with acknowledgement to the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and the appropriate citation. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project objectives ..................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Released Under the Official Information
    Attachment E crassi RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIALNZ Transport INFORMATION Agency and Auckland ACT Transport East West Connections Project Ecological Assessment to Support Option Selection November 2014 RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT GHD | Report for NZ Transport Agency and Auckland Transport - East West Connections Project, 51/326513/202 | i Table of contents 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Description ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Limitations ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Assumptions ........................................................................................................................ 5 2. Assessment Methodology .............................................................................................................. 6 3. Background Information - Existing Environment ............................................................................ 7 4. Key Design Assumptions ............................................................................................................... 8 5. Assessment of Options ................................................................................................................ 10 5.1 Potential Environmental Effects ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ōrākei Local Board Open Space Network Plan
    Ōrākei Local Board Open Space Network Plan September 2019 1 Cover image – view over a section of the Pourewa Creek (source, Flickr). 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SECTION 1 - THE ŌRĀKEI OPEN SPACE NETWORK ................................................................................... Section 1 introduces the Ōrākei local board area and investigates the current state of the open space network plan. 1.1 Purpose of the network plan ............................................................................................. 5 1.2 Ōrākei Local Board area ................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Strategic context ............................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Current state ..................................................................................................................... 8 Treasure .................................................................................................................. 8 Enjoy ..................................................................................................................... 16 Connect ................................................................................................................. 22 Utilise ..................................................................................................................... 23 SECTION 2 – KEY MOVES ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Walk Final with out Cover Re-Print.Indd
    Heritage Walks _ The Engineering Heritage of Auckland 5 The Auckland City Refuse Destructor 1905 Early Electricity Generation 1908 9 Wynyard Wharf 1922 3 13 Auckland Electric 1 Hobson Wharf The New Zealand National Maritime Museum Tramways Co. Ltd Princes Wharf 1937 1989 1899–1902 1921–24 12 7 2 The Viaduct 10 4 11 The Auckland Gasworks, Tepid Baths Lift Bridge The Auckland Harbour Bridge The Sky Tower Viaduct Harbour first supply to Auckland 1865 1914 1932 1955-59 1997 1998-99 Route A 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Route B 14 Old 15 Auckland High Court 13 The Old Synagogue 1 10 Albert Park 1942 Government 1865-7 1884-85 The Ferry Building House 1912 1856 16 Parnell Railway Bridge and Viaduct 5 The Dingwall Building 1935 1865-66 3 Chief Post Office 1911 The Britomart Transport Centre 7 The Ligar Canal, named 1852, improved 1860s, covered 1870s 6 8 Civic Theatre 1929 2001-2004 New Zealand 9 Guardian Trust The Auckland Town Hall Building 1911 1914 17 The Auckland Railway Station 1927-37 11 Albert Barracks Wall 2 Queens Wharf 1913 1846-7 4 The Dilworth Building 1926 12 University of Auckland Old Arts Building 1923-26 10 Route A, approx 2.5 hours r St 9 Route B, approx 2.5 hours Hame Brigham St Other features Jellicoe St 1 f r ha W Madden s 2 e St St rf Princ a 12 h 13 W s Beaumont START HERE een 11 Qu Pakenha m St St 1 son ob H St bert y St n St Gaunt St Al 2 e e Pakenh S ue ket Place H1 am Q Hals St 3 ar Customs M St Quay St 3 4 18 NORTH Sw 8 St anson S Fanshawe t 5 7 6 Wyn Shortla dham nd
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland's Urban Form
    A brief history of Auckland’s urban form April 2010 A brief history of Auckland’s urban form April 2010 Introduction 3 1840 – 1859: The inaugural years 5 1860 – 1879: Land wars and development of rail lines 7 1880 – 1899: Economic expansion 9 1900 – 1929: Turning into a city 11 1930 – 1949: Emergence of State housing provision 13 1950 – 1969: Major decisions 15 1970 – 1979: Continued outward growth 19 1980 – 1989: Intensifi cation through infi ll housing 21 1990 – 1999: Strategies for growth 22 2000 – 2009: The new millennium 25 Conclusion 26 References and further reading 27 Front cover, top image: North Shore, Auckland (circa 1860s) artist unknown, Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tamaki, gift of Marshall Seifert, 1991 This report was prepared by the Social and Economic Research and Monitoring team, Auckland Regional Council, April 2010 ISBN 978-1-877540-57-8 2 History of Auckland’s Urban Form Auckland region Built up area 2009 History of Auckland’s Urban Form 3 Introduction This report he main feature of human settlement in the Auckland region has been the development This report outlines the of a substantial urban area (the largest in development of Auckland’s New Zealand) in which approximately 90% urban form, from early colonial Tof the regional population live. This metropolitan area settlement to the modern Auckland is located on and around the central isthmus and metropolis. It attempts to capture occupies around 10% of the regional land mass. Home the context and key relevant to over 1.4 million people, Auckland is a vibrant centre drivers behind the growth in for trade, commerce, culture and employment.
    [Show full text]
  • ONEHUNGA Transform Onehunga
    ONEHUNGA Transform Onehunga High Level Project Plan – March 2017 ABBREVIATIONS AT Auckland Transport ATEED Auckland Tourism, Events and Economic Development Ltd CCO Council-controlled organisation the council Auckland Council HLPP High Level Project Plan HNZ Housing New Zealand LTP Long-term Plan Panuku Panuku Development Auckland AUP Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) SOI Statement of Intent 2 PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 5 3.7 Infrastructure 34 7.3.4 Manukau Harbour Forum 68 1.1 Mihi 8 3.7.1 Social infrastructure 34 7.3.5 Large Infrastructure Integration Group 68 1.2 Shaping spaces for Aucklanders to love 9 3.7.2 Physical infrastructure 34 7.3.6 Onehunga community champions 68 1.3 Panuku – who we are 10 3.7.3 Infrastructure projects 35 7.3.7 Baseline engagement 69 1.4 Why Onehunga? 12 7.3.8 Auckland Council family 69 4.0 PANUKU PRINCIPLES 39 1.5 Purpose of this High Level Project Plan 13 7.3.9 Place-led engagement 69 FOR TRANSFORM PROJECTS 1.6 Developing the Transform Onehunga story 14 7.4 Place-making for Onehunga 70 4.1 Panuku’s commitment 40 2.0 VISION THEMES FOR 17 4.2 Panuku principles for Transform projects 40 8.0 PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION 73 TRANSFORM ONEHUNGA 8.1 Development strategy 74 5.0 GOALS FOR TRANSFORM ONEHUNGA 43 8.1.1 Key infl uences 74 3.0 CONTEXT 21 6.0 STRATEGIC MOVES 47 8.1.2 Proposed delivery strategy 74 3.1 Background 22 6.1 Strategic Move: Build on existing strengths (RETAIN) 50 8.2 Town Centre Core 76 3.2 Mana Whenua 23 6.1.1 Potential projects and initiatives 51 8.3 Town Centre
    [Show full text]