DOCSLIB.ORG

Carshare-2000-Final-Report.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Carshare-2000-Final-Report.Pdf The Journal of World Transport Policy & Practice 24H Ltd. -- Andelsbilklub -- AutozumTeilen -- AutoCom -- Autodeled -- AUTOparat -- AutoShare -- Auto-taxi -- Autotaxis -- Autoteilen -- Autovermietung -- Bilföreningen -- Bilkooperative -- Bilklub -- Bilpool -- Block Cars -- Buurt Auto Service -- Caisse Commune -- CampusCar -- CarLink -- car sharing -- carsharing -- Car-Share -- CHOICE -- City Car Club -- City CarShare -- COgOCar -- CommunAuto -- Community Cars -- Co-Op Auto Network -- Cooperative Auto Network (CAN) -- Crayon -- Dancing Rabbit -- Delebilen -- Delebilklub -- Easydrive -- GemeinschaftsAuto -- Green Car -- HaBil -- Huur-op-Maat -- ICVS -- Motor Pool Co-operative -- Neighborhood Cars -- NTUC Car Co-Op -- Ökomobil -- Pay-As-You-Drive -- People's Car -- Praxitele -- Procotip -- PubliCar -- Selbstfahrergemeinschaft -- Self-drive taxi -- Shared cars -- (ultra) Short term car rental -- STAR (Short-Term Auto Rental) -- Station Cars -- StattAuto -- Stadtauto -- Stadtcar -- Stadtmobil -- TeilAuto -- U-Drive Taxi -- Vivallabil -- Witkar -- ZipCar -- . and more! Carsharing 2000 SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT’S MISSING LINK Eric Britton & @World Carshare Associates The Commons and Ecoplan 8/10, rue Joseph Bara 75006 Paris, France email [email protected] www.EcoPlan.org Voice/Video: 331.4441.6340 Fax 331.4441.6341 Data 331.4441.6342 In the year 2000 you can carshare any day in . Aachen * Aarau * Aarhus * Adiswil * Adligenswil * Aesch * Affoltern a.A. * Allschwil * Alpnach * Altdorf * Altstatten * Amriswil * Amsterdam Zuid * Andelfingen * Andermatt * Appenzell * Arbon * Arnstadt * Arth-Goldau * Baretswil * Boblingen * Bulach * Baar * Bad Homburg * Bad Ragaz * Bad Sackingen * Bad Schwartau * Bad Vilbel * Baden * Basel * Bassersdorf * Bauma * Bayreuth * Bellinzona * Belp * Bergdietikon * Bergen * Bergisch Gladbach * Bergsjöns * Berikon * Berlin * Bermgarten * Bern * Beromunster * Biberach * Biel * Bielefeld * Binningen * Birsfelden * Bochum * Bolligen * Bonn * Bonstetten * Bordesholm * Bottmingen * Boulder * Braunschweig * Bremen * Bremerhaven * Bremgarten * Brig * Brønshøj * Brugg * Brugg Weiermatt * Bubikon * Buchholz * Buchs * Buochs * Burgdorf * Colbe * Calgary * Carouge * Castrop-Rauxel * Celle * Checirc;ne- Bourg * Cham * Chur * Coburg * Copenhagen * Corburg * Cottbus * Cranfield * Dubendorf * Dudingen * Duren * Durnten * Dusseldorf * Dachau * Darmstadt * Davos * Degersheim * Den Haag * Dessau * Dielsdorf * Dietikon * Domat/Ems * Dordrecht * Dornach-Arlesheim * Dortmund * Dossenheim * Dresden * Duisburg * Ebikon * Ebnat-Kappel * Ecublens * Edinburgh * Effretikon * Eglisau * Einsiedeln * Elgg * Elmshorn * Emmen * Emmenbrucke * Enzingen * Eppstein * Erfurt * Erlangen * Erstfeld * Esbjerg * Essen * Esslingen * Esslingen * Ettlingen * Eutin * Fallanden * Furth * Farum * Faulensee * Fellbach * Filderstadt * Flawil * Florence * Fort Collins * Frankfurt/M * Frauenfeld * Freising * Frenkendorf * Fribourg * Frick * Frutigen * Gegrave;neve * Gottingen * Garching * Gauting * Gebenstorf * Gelsenkirchen * Gelterkinden * Gevelsberg * Gieszlig;en * Gipf- Oberfrick * Giswil * Goldach * Gossau SG * Göttingen * Grafelfing * Grut * Grabs * Grenchen * Greven * Gstaad * Guelph * Huckelhoven * Haarlem * Hagen * Halberstadt * Halle * Hamburg * Hameln * Hanau * Hannover * Hannover * Hausen am Albis * Hedingen * Heerbrugg * Heidelberg * Heidenheim * Heimenschwand * Helsinki * Herbrechtingen * Herdecke * Herisau * Herning * Herrliberg-Feldmeile * Herzogenbuchsee * Heuchelheim * Hildesheim * Hinwil * Hisingens * Hitzkirch * Hochdorf * Hofheim * Holzwickede * Hombrechtikon * Horgen * Horw * Ilanz * Illnau * Ingolstadt * Interlaken * Iserlohn * Ittigen * Jena * Jona * Koln * Koniz * Kusnacht * Kussnacht * Kalmar * Karlsruhe * Karlstads * Kassel * Kempten * Kiel * Kingston * Kirchheim/Teck * Kitch.Waterloo * Klosters * Kloten * Koblenz * Konolfingen * Konstanz * Kreuzlingen * Kriens * Lorrach * Lubeck * Ludenscheid * Luneburg * La Chaux-de Fonds * Laatzen * Lachen * Landquart * Landshut * Langen * Langenfeld * Langenhagen * Langenthal * Langnau * Laufen * Lausanne * Lausen * Lehrte * Leipzig * Lenzburg * Leverkusen * Lichtensteig * Liestal * Ligerz/Twann * Lilienthal * Littau * Locarno * Ludwigsburg * Ludwigshafen * Lugano * Luzern * Lyss * Mannedorf * Mohlin * Monchaltorf * Mulheim/Ruhr * Munchen * Munchenbuchsee * Munchsteinach * Munsingen * Munster * Magdeburg * Magden * Mainz * Majornas * Mannheim * Marburg * Marl * Meggen * Meilen * Memmingen * Merseburg * Mettmenstetten * Minden * Montreal * Montreux * Muri * Muri- Gumligen * Muttenz * Nanikon * Nurnberg * Nagold * Neckargmund * Neuchacirc;tel * Neuhausen * Neuss * Nidau * Niederhasli * Niederlenz * Nussbaumen * Nyon * Oberdorf/Stans * Oberhausen * Oberkirch * Oberursel * Oberuster * Oberwil * Obfelden * Odense * Offenbach * Oldenburg * Olten * Opfikon * Oslo * Ottawa * Osnarbruck * Ossingen * Ostermundigen * Ostfildern * Overijssel * Oxford * Pansdorf * Paris * Passau * Petit-Lancy * Pfaffikon * Pforzheim * Pfullingen * Plannegg * Plochingen * Portland * Potsdam * Pratteln * Preetz * Puchheim * Pully * Quebec City * Rumlang * Ruschlikon * Russelsheim * Ruti * Rafz * Rannebergens * Rapperswil * Ratzeburg * Ravensburg * Rebstein * Refrath * Regensburg * Regensdorf * Reichenbach * Reinach * Renens * Reussbuhl * Reutlingen * Rheinfelden * Rhein-Neckar * Richterswil * Riehen * Rodovre * Roggwil * Romanshorn * Rombach * Rorschach * Rostock * Rostock * Rothenburg * Rotkreuz * Rottenburg * Rotterdam * Rudolfstetten * Ruswil * Suszlig;en * Saarbrucken * Sachseln * SaintQuentin * Samedan * SanFrancisco * Sargans * Sarnen * Schofflisdorf * Schoftland * Schonenwerd * Schupfen * Schaffhausen * Schattdorf * Schiedam * Schiers * Schlieren * Schliern * Schopfheim * Schwabisch Hall * Schwarzenburg * Schwerin * Schwerzenbach * Schwetzingen * Schwyz * Seattle * Seeheim- Jugenheim * Seelze * Sempach * Siegen * Sindelfingen * Singapore * Sion * Sissach * Soest * Solothurn * Speyer * Spiez * Stafa * St. Gallen * Stade * Stans * Stansstad * Starrkirch-Will * Steffisburg * Steinbach a.Ts. * Steinen * Steinhausen * Stockholms * Stuttgart * Suhr * Sundbybergs * Sursee * Tubingen * Thalwil * Therwil * Thun * Thusis * Tornesch * Toronto * Trubach * Traverse City * Trimbach * Tübingen * Turbenthal-Wila * Turgi * Ulm * Umkirch * Unna * Urdorf * Uster * Utrecht * Uznach * Uzwil * Valby * Vancouver * Växjö * Veltheim * Venezia * Vevey * Victoria * Vienna * Viernheim * Vinterviken * Volketswil * Wadenswil * Wurzburg * Wabern * Waiblingen * Wald * Wallisellen * Waltrop * Washington, DC * Wattenscheid * Wattwil * Weinfelden * Weingarten * Weinheim * Wettenberg * Wetter * Wettingen * Wetzikon * Wetzlar * Wiesbaden * Wiesendangen * Wiesloch * Will * Willisau * Winterthur * Witten * Wittenbach * Wittenberg * Witzenhausen * Wolfenbuttel * Wolhusen * Worb * Worms * Wunsdorf * Yverdon * Zurich * Zofingen * Zollikerberg * Zollikofen * Zuchwil * Zug * Zurich * Zweisimmen The Journal of World Transport Policy & Practice ISSN 1352-7614 The only practically-oriented journal dealing with the major issues in a field of international concern. WTP&P deals in an informed and even-handed manner with quality of the transport service, of the environment, of daily life and of material published. Experts in transport, the environment, geography, economics, society and ecology contribute probing papers dealing with key issues in transport, case studies and reports of trials, and assess the difficulties of balancing economic and ecological considerations as we strive to develop a better transport system in all respects. The Journal’s interactive Web site at www.ecoplan.org/wtpp offers working papers and reports as shareware and invites critical comments and discussion. Publisher: Eco-Logica Ltd. 53 Derwent Road, Lancaster, LA1 3ES. U.K. Telephone +44 1524 63175 Fax +44 1524 848340 Business Manager: Pascal Desmond ([email protected]). Editor in Chief: John Whitelegg, Professor of Environmental Studies Liverpool John Moores University, Clarence Street, Liverpool, L3 5UG, U.K [email protected] URL www.ecoplan.org/wtpp Editorial Board: Eric Britton, Managing Director EcoPlan International Le Frene, 8/10 rue Joseph Bara, 75006 Paris, France [email protected] URL http://www.ecoplan.org John Howe, Professor of Engineering International Institute for Infrastructural, Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering P.O. Box 3015, NL-2601 Delft, The Netherlands [email protected] Mikel Murga, President Leber Planificación e Ingenieria S.A. Apartado 79, 48930 Las Arenas, Bizkaia, Spain [email protected] URL http://www.leber.org Paul Tranter, Senior Lecturer Geography and Oceanography University College, Canberra, Australia [email protected] Subscriptions: The Journal is published four times a year. Subscriptions, to be sent to Eco-Logica Ltd., 53 Derwent Road, Lancaster, LA1 3ES. U.K., are € 120 per year for libraries and institutions, and € 60 for individuals,. Available at cost for students and groups in the developing countries (contact us for exact price with mail charges). This special issue is shareware: This special report has been produced through an extensive international volunteer effort and is being made available now as “shareware”. If you download a copy from our Web site (www.ecoplan.org/wtpp) or receive one in some other way, and find it useful, kindly consider sending a check to the Journal at the above address. The suggested contribution is € 30 or US$30.00 (that’s 10 cents per page). These funds are used to support the Journal and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Carsharing 2025 – Nische Oder Mainstream?
    CarSharing 2025 – nische oder MainStreaM? Sebastian Riegler, Maria Juschten, Reinhard Hössinger, Regine Gerike, Lars Rößger Bernhard Schlag, Wilko Manz, Christoph Rentschler, Johanna Kopp Mit diesem Bericht werden die Ergebnisse einer Grundlagenstudie zu neuen Nutzungskonzepten für individuelle Mobilität zusammengefasst. Das Projekt wurde beauftragt durch das Institut für Mobilitätsforschung (ifmo) und durchgeführt vom Institut für Verkehrswesen der Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, dem Lehrstuhl für Verkehrspsychologie der Technischen Universität Dresden und der INOVAPLAN GmbH. Die Studienautoren danken allen Carsharing-Anbietern, die die Studie unterstützt und sie dadurch erst ermöglicht haben. Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Institut für Verkehrswesen: Sebastian Riegler, Maria Juschten, Dr. Reinhard Hössinger, Prof. Regine Gerike Technische Universität Dresden, Lehrstuhl für Verkehrspsychologie: Lars Rößger, Prof. Bernhard Schlag INOVAPLAN GmbH: Dr. Wilko Manz, Christoph Rentschler Design: Bernhard Moosbauer, www.exsample.org © 2016 ifmo 4 CARShARing 2025 – nischE oDER MAinstream? 5 Inhalt Vorwort 6 Kapitel 4 Ist Carsharing für meine Wege geeignet? 71 Danksagung 7 a. Wofür wird Carsharing genutzt? 72 Executive Summary 8 Planung der Buchungen: Spontanität vs. Vorausdenker 72 Beginnzeiten der Fahrten: After-Work vs. Afternoon Tea 73 Kapitel 1 Einleitung 11 Fahrtweiten: Nahverkehr vs. Langstrecke 74 a. Grundlagen des Teilens und Nutzens 12 Start & Ziel der Fahrten: Innerstädtisch vs. Fahrten ins Grüne 76 Teilen, Nutzen, Besitz, Eigentum – Begriffsklärung 12 Fahrtzwecke: Freizeit & nach Hause vs. Einkauf & Ausflug 77 Welche Motive bedienen Eigentum und eigentumslose Nutzung? 14 Alternative zu Carsharing: zu Fuß und eigener Pkw vs. Erweiterung der Mobilität 78 b. Was unterscheidet Carsharing von anderen Formen der Pkw-Nutzung? 17 Verzicht auf Carsharing: Parkplatzproblematik vs. Umweltgedanke 80 c. Die Forschungsfrage: Was wollen wir erreichen? 19 b.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Urban Sharing Team
    URBAN SHARING City report no 2 in TORONTO URBAN SHARING TEAM URBAN SHARING IN TORONTO City report no. 2 URBAN SHARING TEAM: Oksana Mont, Andrius Plepys, Yuliya Voytenko Palgan, Jagdeep Singh, Matthias Lehner, Steven Curtis, Lucie Zvolska, and Ana Maria Arbelaez Velez 2020 Cover design: Lucie Zvolska Cover photo: Oksana Mont Copyright: URBAN SHARING TEAM ISBN: 978-91-87357-62-6. Print Urban Sharing in Toronto, City report no.2 ISBN: 978-91-87357-63-3. Pdf Urban Sharing in Toronto, City report no. 2 Printed in Sweden by E-print, Stockholm 2020 Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 2 THE CITY CONTEXT ................................................................................. 5 2.1 Geography and demographics ................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Topography and urban sprawl .................................................. 5 2.1.2 Socio-demographics.................................................................. 6 2.1.3 Tourism ..................................................................................... 6 2.2 City governance ....................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Governance structure ................................................................ 6 2.2.2 City regulatory policies for sharing ............................................ 8 2.3 Economy ................................................................................................ 11 2.3.1
    [Show full text]
  • L'écho-Mobile
    L’écho -mobile COMMUNAUTo’s newsletter · APRIL 2011 · VOL. XVII, NO 1 Communatuo’s first incursion in an out-of-province market (page 6 ) In this issue/ And more/ Editorial (page 2 ) CarShare HFX Halifax (page 6 ) The Competition Is Not What It Seems Communauto becomes a shareholder Improved agreements (page 4 ) BIXI-AUTO and BIXI-AUTO-BUS (page 6 ) The network reservation is better than ever The DUO and the TRIO are exclusively back for this summer Long distance rates (page 4 ) Caisse d’économie solidaire (page 3 ) Easier access and other improvements A $500 loan to switch to a member subscription and more / > EDITORIAL The Competition Is Not What It Seems Daimler’s car2go, BMW’s premium carsharing Edinburgh, Scotland (a more motivated local service, the upcoming Volkswagen project in firm saved the project at the last minute.) In Hanover and Renault-Nissan’s New Mobility 2008, Honda withdrew from the Singapore Concept, are radically changing the car market after six years, its efforts deemed industry. unsuccessful, despite praise from the critics and the community’s disappointment (And The arrival of the automobile industry’s major yet how difficult would it be for such a large players on the “mobility-on-demand” market company to manage a fleet of just under 100 will hopefully accelerate the concept’s large- vehicles?). scale development over the next few years. Benoît Robert It is sometimes disconcerting that, para- Chief Executive Officer It may seem surprising at first that manu- doxically, companies with the most resources Communauto facturers are investing in the carsharing lack perseverance when it comes to industry, given that it helps reduce household innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Course in Public Transport. the Car As a Component
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Project Group on Mobility (Ed.) Working Paper Changing course in public transport: the car as a component of competitive services WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS II 02-103 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Project Group on Mobility (Ed.) (2002) : Changing course in public transport: the car as a component of competitive services, WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS II 02-103, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/49803 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Veröffentlichung der Abteilung “Organisation und Technikgenese“ des Forschungsschwerpunktes Technik-Arbeit-Umwelt am WZB FS II 02-103 Changing Course in Public Transport: The Car as a Component of Competitive Services Choice-Research, Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Aktueller Stand Des Car-Sharing in Europa
    more options for energy efficient mobility through Car-Sharing Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 Juni 2010 Bundesverband CarSharing e. V. Willi Loose momo Car-Sharing More options for energy efficient mobility through Car-Sharing Grant agreement No.: IEE/07/696/SI2.499387 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 I Inhaltsverzeichnis 0. Zusammenfassung 1 1. Einleitung und Übersicht 7 1.1 Das Projekt momo Car-Sharing 7 1.2 Inhalt des Berichts 9 2. Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa 11 2.1 Überblick 11 2.2 Stand des Car-Sharing in europäischen Ländern 13 2.2.1 Belgien 13 2.2.2 Dänemark 14 2.2.3 Deutschland 14 2.2.4 Finnland 15 2.2.5 Frankreich 16 2.2.6 Großbritannien 16 2.2.7 Irland 17 2.2.8 Italien 18 2.2.9 Niederlande 19 2.2.10 Österreich 19 2.2.11 Portugal 19 2.2.12 Schweden 20 2.2.13 Schweiz 20 2.2.14 Spanien 21 2.3 Vergleichende Einschätzung des Car-Sharing-Wachstums 21 3. Befragung der europäischen Car-Sharing-Anbieter 24 3.1 Methodik der Befragung 24 3.2 Rücklauf der Fragebögen 25 3.3 Ausgewählte Befragungsergebnisse 27 3.3.1 Erhebungsergebnisse zur Car-Sharing-Nutzung 27 3.3.2 Erhebungsergebnisse zu Kooperationen der Car-Sharing-Anbieter 39 3.3.3 Erhebungsergebnisse zur politischen Unterstützung 50 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 II 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models
    Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models Susan A. Shaheen1 and Nelson D. Chan2 Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Carsharing continues to grow worldwide as a powerful strategy to provide an alternative to solo driving. The viability of electric vehicles, or EVs, has been examined in various carsharing business models. Moreover, new technologies have given rise to electromobility, or e-mobility, systems. This paper discusses the evolution of e-mobility in carsharing business models and the challenges and opportunities that EVs present to carsharing operators around the world. Operators are now anticipating increased EV proliferation into vehicle fleets over the next 5- 10 years as technology, infrastructure, and public policy shift toward support of e- mobility systems. Thus, research is still needed to quantify impacts of EVs in changing travel behavior toward more sustainable transport. 1 Introduction Carsharing enables a group of members to share a vehicle fleet that is maintained, managed, and insured by a third-party organization. Primarily used for short-term trips, carsharing can provide affordable, self-service vehicle access 24-h per day for those who do not have a car, want to reduce the number of vehicles in their household, or do not use their vehicle during the day for long periods of time. Rates include fuel, insurance, and maintenance. Ideally, carsharing works best in a neighborhood, business, or campus setting where users could walk, bike, share rides, or take public transit to access the shared-use vehicles. Carsharing has evolved through several phases since the first carsharing system began in Europe in 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Scenario Planning for the German Carsharing Industry – 2025
    Strategic Scenario Planning for the German Carsharing Industry – 2025 Carolin von Sethe Working Paper Version 1 March 18th, 2016 I Abstract II I Abstract What happens when the Internet of Things1, traditional mobility and the modern consumer coalesce? Nobody knows yet. The increasing uncertainty and complexity that result from the pace of technological progress, blurring boundaries between industry ecosystems and the volatile macroeconomic environment affect future mobility severely. Carsharing is at the forefront of an evolution that points towards a secular shift from individually owned-and-operated automobiles to mobility-on-demand. The purpose of this study is to develop four plausible scenarios for the future of the German carsharing industry in the year 2025 by applying the HHL- Roland Berger scenario development approach and to establish adequate core and optional strategies to aid strategic decision making of managers from companies in the carsharing ecosystem. Key Words: Scenario-based Strategic Planning ∙ Carsharing ∙ Shared Mobility ∙ Strategic Decision Making 1 The Internet of Things (short: IoT) is a term coined for the network of and communication between all devices with enabled Internet connection (Morgan, 2014). II Table of Contents III II Table of Contents I Abstract ............................................................................................................... II II Table of Contents .............................................................................................. III III Table of Figures
    [Show full text]
  • Cusecar – Community Car-Sharing Program: Car Sharing Lessons Learned
    CuseCar – Community Car-Sharing Program: Car Sharing Lessons Learned The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Joseph D. Tario Project Manager and New York State Department of Transportation Robert Ancar Project Manager Prepared by Sarah Stephens Director of Business Development and Public Relations CuseCar of Syracuse Syracuse, NY August 2011 1 1. Report No. C-08-26 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date CuseCar – Community Car-Sharing Program: Car Sharing Lessons Learned August 2011 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) Sarah Stephens 8. Performing Organization Report No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. 11. Contract or Grant No CuseCar of Syracuse, 360 Erie Blvd. East, Syracuse, NY 13202 Contract No. 11103 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered NYSERDA, 17 Columbia Circle, Albany, NY 12203 Final Report (2008 – 2011) NYS DOT, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12232 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Project funded in part with funds from the Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract CuseCar of Syracuse launched services in December 2008 with 3 Toyota Prius Hybrids. CuseCar initially, due to concerns about availability, limited membership to Origination Sponsor Locations, which in turn developed few members. In 2009 CuseCar opened to the general public and has seen a small growth in membership and usage. CuseCar to date has close to 100 members. CuseCar has vehicles centralized in the City of Syracuse Downtown area, with 4 vehicles located within a few city blocks of one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Benchmarking of Existing Business / Operating Models & Best Practices
    SHared automation Operating models for Worldwide adoption SHOW Grant Agreement Number: 875530 D2.1.: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices This report is part of a project that has received funding by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement number 875530 Legal Disclaimer The information in this document is provided “as is”, and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The above-referenced consortium members shall have no liability to third parties for damages of any kind including without limitation direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages that may result from the use of these materials subject to any liability which is mandatory due to applicable law. © 2020 by SHOW Consortium. This report is subject to a disclaimer and copyright. This report has been carried out under a contract awarded by the European Commission, contract number: 875530. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the SHOW project. D2.1: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices 2 Executive Summary D2.1 provides the state-of-the-art for business and operating roles in the field of mobility services (MaaS, LaaS and DRT containing the mobility services canvas as description of the selected representative mobility services, the business and operating models describing relevant business factors and operation environment, the user and role analysis representing the involved user and roles for the mobility services (providing, operating and using the service) as well as identifying the success and failure models of the analysed mobility services and finally a KPI-Analysis (business- driven) to give a structured economical evaluation as base for the benchmarking.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement+Agreement+Avis.Pdf
    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. In re: Investigative Subpoena Duces Tecum issued by the Florida Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, Consumer CASE NO. 2017 CA 000122 Protection Division, to AvisBudget Group, Inc. and Payless Car Rental System, Inc. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ("Settlement Agreement") is entered into by and between the Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs ("Attorney General"), on one hand, and Avis Budget Car Rental System, LLC, and Payless Car Rental, Inc., (collectively "ABCR"),1 on the other, and is effective as of the date of the last signature on the Settlement Agreement. RECITALS 1. Whereas, ABCR, through its subsidiary entities, is engaged in the car rental business throughout the State of Florida; 2. Whereas, there are toll roads, including many that are cashless, established and operated by the State of Florida or various political subdivisions of the State. On cashless toll roads, drivers are unable to pay for tolls with cash and are billed Avis Budget Car Rental System, LLC, and Payless Car Rental, Inc., are subsidiaries of AvisBudget Group, Inc., the petitioner in this action. The terms of this Settlement Agreement do not apply to: (a) Budget Truck rentals; (b) Zipcar rentals; or (c) rentals made by independently owned and operated Avis, Budget, or Payless licensees. EXHIBIT A for use of the toll road by either a transponder systemor a plate recognition system; 3. Whereas, all major car rental companies operating in Florida charge foruse of an electronic toll payment service.
    [Show full text]
  • Carsharing and Partnership Management an International Perspective
    118 Paper No. 99-0826 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1666 Carsharing and Partnership Management An International Perspective SUSAN SHAHEEN, DANIEL SPERLING, AND CONRAD WAGNER Most cars carry one person and are used for less than 1 hour per day. A tied to actual vehicle usage. A carsharing system in effect transforms more economically rational approach would be to use vehicles more the fixed costs of vehicle ownership into variable costs. intensively. Carsharing, in which a group of people pays a subscription Carsharing is most effective and attractive when seen as a trans- plus a per-use fee, is one means of doing so. Carsharing may be orga- portation mode that fills the gap between transit and private cars and nized through affinity groups, large employers, transit operators, neigh- borhood groups, or large carsharing businesses. Relative to car owner- that can be linked to other modes and transportation services. For ship, carsharing has the disadvantage of less convenient vehicle access long distances, one may use a household vehicle, air transport, rail, but the advantages of a large range of vehicles, fewer ownership respon- bus, or a rental car; and for short distances, one might walk, bicycle, sibilities, and less cost (if vehicles are not used intensively). The uncou- or use a taxi. But for intermediate travel activities, even routine ones, pling of car ownership and use offers the potential for altering vehicle one might use a shared vehicle. The shared-car option provides other usage and directing individuals toward other mobility options. The per- customer attractions: it can serve as mobility insurance in emergen- ceived convenience (e.g., preferred parking) and cost savings of car- cies and as a means of satisfying occasional vehicle needs and sharing have promoted a new modal split for many carsharing partici- pants throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • SHARED MOBILITY Removing Regulatory Barriers in Canadian Cities
    SHARED MOBILITY Removing Regulatory Barriers In Canadian Cities Prepared for ÉQUITERRE MAY 2017 1 SHARED MOBILITY Removing regulatory barriers in canadian cities Submitted to : Prepared by : www.equiterre.org www.dunsky.com Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank representatives of the following organizations for their contributions and insights to this report : Équiterre (Annie Berube and Sidney Ribaux); Coop Carbone (Vincent Dussault); the cities of Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver; and solution providers Car2Go, Communauto, Téo Taxi, Uber and Zipcar. About Dunsky Energy Consulting Headquartered in Montreal, Dunsky Energy Consulting supports an array of organizations in building a sustainable energy future. Dunsky’s clients include leading governments, energy utilities, private firms and non-profit orga- nizations throughout North America. EXPERTISE SERVICES CLIENTELE • Energy Efciency • Assess clean energy • Governments & Demand Management opportunities • Utilities • Renewable Energy • Design policies, plans, & Distributed Resources programs and strategies • Private firms • Sustainable Mobility • Evaluate performance • Non-profits SELECT CLIENTS 2 ABOUT ÉQUITERRE Équiterre is Quebec’s largest and most influential environmental organization, with 20,000 members, 200 volunteers, and a staff of 40 people. Mission Équiterre offers concrete solutions to accelerate the transition towards a society in which individuals, organizations and governments make ecological choices that are both healthy and equitable. Vision By 2030, Équiterre, in partnership with local communities, will have contributed to the development of public policies as well as civic and business practices that lead to a low-carbon economy and an environment free of toxic substances. Areas of Intervention Since its creation in 1993, Équiterre developed projects on key issues such as food, agriculture, transportation, buildings, consumption and climate change.
    [Show full text]