DOCSLIB.ORG

R"L L/9O Date • II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
R AN INTELLECTUAL BIOGRAPHY OF HEBER DO UST CURTIS: ONE MAN'S QUEST FOR ASTRONOMICAL CERTAINTY by Miriam E. Carolin A thesis submitted to Sonoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS m HISTORY Ste~h en Watrous :;,hard H. Karas r"L l/9o Date • II Copyright 1990 By Miriam E. Carolin .Ill I do not approve the reproduction of this thesis, either in part or in its entirety. Dated s /, I/.? IV AN INTELLECTUAL BIOGRAPHY OF HEBER DOUST CURTIS: ONE MAN'S QUEST FOR ASTRONOMICAL CERTAINTY Thesis by Miriam E. Carolin ABSTRACT Purpose of this Study: From 1917 to 1935, a controversy raged over the identification and location of the spiral nebulae. One faction proposed the spiral nebulae as members of the Milky Way. Their opponents insisted that the nebulae were island universes or galaxies far outside the Milky Way. Heber Curtis, who became known as the leadin~ advocate of the island universe theory, concluded that these nebulae were indeed galaxies, while he was working as an astronomer at Lick Observatory. This paper is an intellectual biography of Curtis and a search for the motivations behind his defense of the island universe theory. Procedure: This study is based on examination of Curtis' private letters, scientific articles, speeches and radio talks. Most of these speeches and talks were made between 1920 and 1938, after the main period of the controversy, hut they reveal his attitude toward the island universe theory. Secondary materials, such as historical treatments of the controversy, were also used. Findings: Heber Curtis steadily advocated the island universe theory of the spiral nebulae regardless of the evidence and worked for its acceptance. He based his conclusions partly on the scientific observations concerning the spectroscopy, space distribution, occulting material, space velocity, novae, rotation and lack of proper motion of the spiral nebulae and analogies between the Milky Way and the spiral nebulae, and in part on his world view, his philosophy of life and on his synthesis of science and religion. v Conclusions: Curtis based his unswervin$ advocacy of the island universe theory on his interpretation of the scientific evidence. His belief in the concepts of order and infinity, his awe at the majesty of the universe and his deep religious conviction also were important contributory factors in his decision. Chair ~t('lo -S-ig_n_J__ u -re~~~ ~~~~~~-----~ M.A. Program: History Sonoma State University VI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank, first of all, Edgar Morse, without whose support and encouragement, I would not have been able to undertake this thesis. His continuing belief in the value of my subject gave me enough incentive to continue with this project even when I became discouraged, and his guidance was invaluable in assisting me in finding the direction this thesis should take. I would like to give special thanks to the members of my committee, whose patience and understanding eased my task considerably and whose willingness to read the many revisions of this thesis and comment upon them made the task easier for me. Stephen Watrous, as chairman, did far more than could reasonably be expected in helping me bring this project to completion. Richard Karas made extremely cogent comments, which helped greatly to clarify the scientific aspect. Joseph Tenn, the third member of my committee, provided valuable insight into the period and assisted me in keeping my scientific facts accurate. It was in one of Dr. Tenn's courses that I first learned of the subject matter of my thesis. I also wish to thank J.J. Wilson and Ambrose Nichols for their unfailing encouragement during my graduate course of studies. J.J. also edited the fourth chapter of my thesis into a readable form. The Bentley Historical Library at the University of Michigan provided microfilm of Curtis' correspondence and speeches. These provided essential material for my research. I would also like to acknowledge the assistance of the late Mrs. C.D. Shane, curator of the Lick Observatory Archives, for opening archival material on Heber Curtis for me. Last, but definitely not least, I wish to thank Joan Wilbur, who allowed me to use her computer and helped me learn to operate this device. This assistance made working on my thesis much easier than it would have been if I had continued my usual practice of working with a typewriter. f ~ - HEBER DOUST CURTIS 1 AN INTELLECTUAL BIOGRAPHY OF HEBER DOUST CURTIS: ONE MAN'S QUEST FOR ASTRONOMICAL CERTAINTY There is a unity and an integral agreement in the features of the island universe theory which appeals very strongly tome. Heber D. Curtis 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 1: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .................................................... 8 CHAPTER2: BIOGRAPHY .................................................................................... 16 CHAPTER3: SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR CURTIS' POSITION ........................ 29 CHAPTER4: NON-SCIENTIFIC FACTORS INFLUENCING CURTIS .............................................................................................. 41 APPENDICES ................................................................................... 56 CHRONOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE ISLAND UNIVERSE CONTROVERSY IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY ............................................. 57 HEBER CURTIS' EDUCATION AND CAREER ................... 60 HEBER CURTIS' ECLIPSE EXPEDITIONS ............................ 61 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................. 62 3 INTRODUCTION Curtis led the way in understanding the spirals. Donald Osterbrock1 Since these two 1917 papers by Curtis both specifically mention the island universe theory, it can be seen that Curtis was responsible for res~rrecting the idea and starting the controversy agam. Richard C Hart2 1Donald E. Osterbrock, John R. Gustafson, and W.J. Shiloh Unruh, Eye on the Sky: Lick Observatory's First Century (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 270. 2Richard C. Hart, "Adriaan van Maanen's Influence on the Island Universe Theory" (Ph.D. diss., Boston University, 1973), 29. 4 During the early part of the twentieth century, a controversy concerning the composition and the placement of the spiral nebulae exercised the minds of the astronomical community. Some astronomers contended that these objects were gaseous in nature, probably the first stages of the evolution of stars or of solar systems situated within the Milky Way. Their opponents argued just as forcefully that they were composed of stars and were located far outside the galaxy, that they were island universes. The controversy began in earnest in 1917, when Heber Curtis published articles on novae in spiral nebulae which mentioned the island universe theory.1 Its climax occurred in 1925, when Edwin Hubble, an astronomer at Mt. Wilson Observatory in southern California, produced evidence that the spiral nebulae were indeed located outside the boundaries of our galaxy. The issue was finally resolved in 1935, when Adriaan van Maanen, also an astronomer at Mt. Wilson Observatory, finally conceded that his measurements of the rotation of several of the spiral nebulae were erroneous. His findings had been the major stumbling block to the general acceptance of the island universe theory of the spiral nebulae. Throughout the controversy, Curtis had remained the leading advocate of the theory. This controversy has received considerable attention. Treatments ranging from mention in astronomical histories to an entire book devoted to the subject have appeared within the decades since the dispute ended. Most of these works have approached the subject from an historical point of view mentioning participants as they appeared. This method of studying the controversy is a valid approach. However, it leaves out one aspect of the controversy which might shed some light on the personal side of the story: the human aspect. It is human beings who do science, who think about it and who accumulate scientific knowledge. This knowledge is useless without the interpretation of the men who obtain it. 1Hart, 26-29. 5 Therefore, it seems natural, when writing about an event in the history of science, to concentrate on the scientist or scientists who contributed to the significance of that event. In an attempt to deal with the human aspect of the controversy, this thesis will examine the episode from the point of view of one of the participants, Heber Doust Curtis. He was an astronomer at Lick Observatory when the controversy erupted, and has been credited by at least one historian with bringing about a resurgence of the dispute which resulted in its final resolution.2 Despite that recognition, until recently Curtis has not received much credit for the part he played in the drama. Yet, he saw clearly what the nature and position of the spiral nebulae were, and, in addition, he brought his conclusions to the attention of both the scientific and non-scientific communities as often as he could. Curtis formed his opinion that the spiral nebulae were island universes about 1914. What is remarkable is that, throughout the lifetime of the controversy, when evidence seemed to contradict his view and other astronomers were swayed by seemingly foolproof arguments, Curtis maintained his position as the leading advocate of the island universe theory.3 The only known time Curtis expressed a doubt was with the following statement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Active Galactic Nuclei and Their Neighbours
    CCD Photometric Observations of Active Galactic Nuclei and their Neighbours by Traianou Efthalia A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ptychion (Physics) in Aristotle University of Thessaloniki September 2016 Supervisor: Manolis Plionis, Professor To my loved ones Many thanks to: Manolis Plionis for accepting to be my thesis adviser. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ii LIST OF FIGURES ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: v LIST OF TABLES :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ix LIST OF APPENDICES :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: x ABSTRACT ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: xi CHAPTER I. Introduction .............................. 1 II. Active Galactic Nuclei ........................ 4 2.1 Early History of AGN’s ..................... 4 2.2 AGN Phenomenology ...................... 7 2.2.1 Seyfert Galaxies ................... 7 2.2.2 Low Ionization Nuclear Emission-Line Regions(LINERS) 10 2.2.3 ULIRGS ........................ 11 2.2.4 Radio Galaxies .................... 12 2.2.5 Quasars or QSO’s ................... 14 2.2.6 Blazars ......................... 15 2.3 The Unification Paradigm .................... 16 2.4 Beyond the Unified Model ................... 18 III. Research Goal and Methodology ................. 21 3.1 Torus ............................... 21 3.2 Ha Balmer Line ......................... 23 3.3 Galaxy-Galaxy Interactions ................... 25 3.4 Our Aim ............................. 27 iii IV. Observations .............................. 29 4.1 The Telescope
    [Show full text]
  • How Supernovae Became the Basis of Observational Cosmology
    Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 19(2), 203–215 (2016). HOW SUPERNOVAE BECAME THE BASIS OF OBSERVATIONAL COSMOLOGY Maria Victorovna Pruzhinskaya Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, Université Clermont Auvergne, Université Blaise Pascal, CNRS/IN2P3, Clermont-Ferrand, France; and Sternberg Astronomical Institute of Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky prospect 13, Russia. Email: [email protected] and Sergey Mikhailovich Lisakov Laboratoire Lagrange, UMR7293, Université Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Boulevard de l'Observatoire, CS 34229, Nice, France. Email: [email protected] Abstract: This paper is dedicated to the discovery of one of the most important relationships in supernova cosmology—the relation between the peak luminosity of Type Ia supernovae and their luminosity decline rate after maximum light. The history of this relationship is quite long and interesting. The relationship was independently discovered by the American statistician and astronomer Bert Woodard Rust and the Soviet astronomer Yury Pavlovich Pskovskii in the 1970s. Using a limited sample of Type I supernovae they were able to show that the brighter the supernova is, the slower its luminosity declines after maximum. Only with the appearance of CCD cameras could Mark Phillips re-inspect this relationship on a new level of accuracy using a better sample of supernovae. His investigations confirmed the idea proposed earlier by Rust and Pskovskii. Keywords: supernovae, Pskovskii, Rust 1 INTRODUCTION However, from the moment that Albert Einstein (1879–1955; Whittaker, 1955) introduced into the In 1998–1999 astronomers discovered the accel- equations of the General Theory of Relativity a erating expansion of the Universe through the cosmological constant until the discovery of the observations of very far standard candles (for accelerating expansion of the Universe, nearly a review see Lipunov and Chernin, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Astrophysics in 2006 3
    ASTROPHYSICS IN 2006 Virginia Trimble1, Markus J. Aschwanden2, and Carl J. Hansen3 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4575, Las Cumbres Observatory, Santa Barbara, CA: ([email protected]) 2 Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory, Organization ADBS, Building 252, 3251 Hanover Street, Palo Alto, CA 94304: ([email protected]) 3 JILA, Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309: ([email protected]) Received ... : accepted ... Abstract. The fastest pulsar and the slowest nova; the oldest galaxies and the youngest stars; the weirdest life forms and the commonest dwarfs; the highest energy particles and the lowest energy photons. These were some of the extremes of Astrophysics 2006. We attempt also to bring you updates on things of which there is currently only one (habitable planets, the Sun, and the universe) and others of which there are always many, like meteors and molecules, black holes and binaries. Keywords: cosmology: general, galaxies: general, ISM: general, stars: general, Sun: gen- eral, planets and satellites: general, astrobiology CONTENTS 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Up 6 1.2 Down 9 1.3 Around 10 2. Solar Physics 12 2.1 The solar interior 12 2.1.1 From neutrinos to neutralinos 12 2.1.2 Global helioseismology 12 2.1.3 Local helioseismology 12 2.1.4 Tachocline structure 13 arXiv:0705.1730v1 [astro-ph] 11 May 2007 2.1.5 Dynamo models 14 2.2 Photosphere 15 2.2.1 Solar radius and rotation 15 2.2.2 Distribution of magnetic fields 15 2.2.3 Magnetic flux emergence rate 15 2.2.4 Photospheric motion of magnetic fields 16 2.2.5 Faculae production 16 2.2.6 The photospheric boundary of magnetic fields 17 2.2.7 Flare prediction from photospheric fields 17 c 2008 Springer Science + Business Media.
    [Show full text]
  • Vendedores De Estrelas
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA BAHIA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE FEIRA DE SANTANA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ENSINO, FILOSOFIA E HISTÓRIA DAS CIÊNCIAS Vendedores de estrelas A existência de outras galáxias pela mídia de massa norte-americana na década de 20. Victória Flório Pires de Andrade Orientação: Olival Freire Júnior Salvador 2017 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA BAHIA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE FEIRA DE SANTANA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ENSINO, FILOSOFIA E HISTÓRIA DAS CIÊNCIAS Vendedores de estrelas A existência de outras galáxias pela mídia de massa norte-americana na década de 20. Victória Flório Pires de Andrade Orientação: Olival Freire Júnior Salvador 2017 A função do historiador é lembrar à sociedade aquilo que ela quer esquecer. — Peter Burke. Ilustração – “Os vendedores de estrelas”, Victória Flório Pires de Andrade. Agradecimentos “O Brasil é feito por nós. Basta saber desatá-los”. — Barão de Itararé Quanto mais avança o tempo na direção do futuro, mais sentimos o peso da história sobre o presente. Neste ano de 2017, experimentamos de maneira fugaz o passar e o pesar do tempo. Há cem anos, no fatídico 1917, os russos fariam estourar a agora centenária revolução. Os norte-americanos deixaram a neutralidade e entraram na primeira guerra contra os alemães. Há 100 anos da Greve Geral de 1917, aqui no Brasil, e que acaba de acontecer novamente, e, em dose dupla, no 28 de abril e no 30 de junho. Há quase cem anos, as mulheres norte-americanas ganhavam direito ao voto, depois de 40 anos na luta. Na mitologia grega, o titã Atlas é quem o mundo carrega, mas como se sente o Ano de 2017 com o peso desses centenários e quase-centenários nas costas? Senti a necessidade de deixar registrado, para o futuro, e, nesta tese, pelo menos um sopro sobre o frustrante momento atual que vivemos.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Cruz Other Recent Work
    UC Santa Cruz Other Recent Work Title Charles Donald Shane: The Lick Observatory Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4sb4j79p Authors Regional History Project, UCSC Library Shane, Charles Donald Calciano, Elizabeth Spedding Publication Date 1969-12-04 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4sb4j79p#supplemental University of California, Santa Cruz The University Library CHARLES DONALD SHANE THE LICK OBSERVATORY An Interview Conducted By Elizabeth Spedding Calciano Santa Cruz ii Charles Donald Shane 1964 iii All uses of this manuscript are covered by an agreement between the Regents of the University of California and Charles Donald Shane, dated January 2, 1969. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The University Library of the University of California, Santa Cruz. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the University Librarian of the University of California, Santa Cruz. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... LICK OBSERVATORY, 1880-1900 .................................................................................. EDWARD SINGLETON HOLDEN AND THE FIRST LICK ASTRONOMERS ..................................... 1 THE DEPARTMENT OF ASTRONOMY, BERKELEY...................................................................... ARMIN OTTO LEUSCHNER ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Curtis/Shapley Debate – 1920 (This Text Is Taken from the Web –
    Curtis/Shapley Debate – 1920 (this text is taken from the Web – http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/diamond_jubilee/debate20.html) A Mediocre Discussion? “The Size and Shape of the Galaxy/Cosmos And the Existence of other Galaxies” Does it really matter that two astronomers debated each other in the beginning of the 20th century? It is now clear that a once little heard-of discussion was at the crux of a major change of humanity's view of our place in the universe. The events that happened in the first quarter of our century were together much more than a debate - this is a story of hu- manity's discovery of the vastness of our universe, a story of a seemingly small academic disagreement whose dramatic resolution staggered the world. It is a story of human drama - two champion astronomers struggling at the focus of a raging controversy whose solution represents an inspiring synthesis of old and new ideas. It is the story of monumen- tal insight and tragic error. It is a story of an astronomical legend. Does this sound melodramatic? It s all true. And it happened this century. In 1920 Harlow Shapley was a young ambitious astronomer. He had published a series of papers marking several fas- cinating astronomical discoveries - many times involving properties of stars in binary systems or globular clusters. He was a rising star himself - a golden boy of astronomy. In 1920 Heber D. Curtis was a bit older, more established, and very well respected in his own right. He had published a series of solid papers on good astronomical results - many times on the properties of spiral nebulae.
    [Show full text]
  • I N S I D E T H I S I S S
    February / février 2008 Volume/volume 102 Number/numéro 1 [728] This Issue's Winning Astrophoto! FEATURING A FULL COLOUR SECTION! The Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada Cassiopeia Rising Over the Plaskett by Charles Banville, Victoria Centre. This is a montage of two pictures I took using a Canon 20Da and a Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L lens. The foreground image was acquired at the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory in Victoria on 2007 July 26. That evening the Plaskett Dome was illuminated by a bright 12-day-old Moon. The star trails were created using 87 light frames of 1 minute each taken from Cattle Point on 2007 August 8. Le Journal de la Société royale d’astronomie du Canada [Editor’s Note: The two-member team of Dietmar Kupke and Paul Mortfield of the Toronto Centre selected this late-entry image from among the 30 or so entries to the “Own the Back Cover” con- test. Thanks to all the submitters. We welcome further entries, so don’t delay – send in yours now! INSIDE THIS ISSUE Watch the back cover of the April issue for the next winner.] One Hundred Editions of the Observer's Handbook · Seriously Seeking Ceres! Mont-Mégantic Dark-Sky Reserve Conference, 2007 September 19-21 Duplicity of ZC1042: My First Double-Star Discovery In Memory of Gertrude Jean Southam Building for the International Year of Astronomy (IYA2009) THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA February / février 2008 NATIONAL OFFICERS AND COUNCIL FOR 2007-2008/CONSEIL ET ADMINISTRATEURS NATIONAUX Honorary President Robert Garrison, Ph.D., Toronto President Scott Young, B.Sc., Winnipeg Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI LUNATIC ON A MOUNTAIN: FRITZ ZWICKY AND THE EARLY HISTORY OF DARK MATTER by Tricia Close Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Saint Mary’s University Halifax,
    [Show full text]
  • Iau Commission C3 Newsletter
    IAU COMMISSION C3 NEWSLETTER HISTORY OF ASTRONOMY Welcome to the winter solstice edition of the newsletter We wish everyone health and happiness in the new year. of IAU Commission C3 (History of Astronomy). This The next issue of the newsletter will be in June 2021. issue features the announcement of a new Project Group Please send our Secretary any news you would like us to and reports of pre-existing Working Groups and Project include. Groups since the last newsletter in June 2020. It contains Sara Schechner, Secretary news of upcoming conferences, reports of recent Wayne Orchiston, President meetings, a list of notable publications, and tables of Christiaan Sterken, Vice-President content from a journal devoted to the history of astronomy. The newsletter also contains announcements of research and PhD opportunities in the history of TABLE OF CONTENTS astronomy as well as an introduction to a new Ourania Network. And of course, you will find news from Reports of Working Groups & Project Groups 2 members, announcements of awards, and obituaries. Making History 15 Oral History 24 We are excited to introduce some new sections to the Art & Exhibitions 26 newsletter. The “Making History” section includes Announcements 30 reports on the Astronomy Genealogy Project (AstroGen), Awards and Honors 34 analysis of the Vatican Observatory’s guest book, and the News from Members 35 rescue of a medieval manuscript by Lewis of Caerleon. In In Memoriam 37 the “Oral History” section, there is a first-hand account Notable Publications 39 of the founding of the Journal of Astronomical History and Journal Contents 41 Heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxford Handbook of the History of Modern Cosmology Edited by Helge Kragh and Malcolm S
    Frontispiece Frontispiece Edited by Helge Kragh and Malcolm S. Longair The Oxford Handbook of the History of Modern Cosmology Edited by Helge Kragh and Malcolm S. Longair Print Publication Date: Mar 2019 Subject: Physical Sciences Online Publication Date: Apr 2019 (p. ii) Frontispiece Frontispiece: The whole-sky map of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) as observed by the Planck satellite of the European Space Agency (ESA). The image shows largescale structures in the Universe only 380,000 years after the Big Bang. It en­ codes a huge amount of information about the cosmological parameters which describe our Universe. (Courtesy of ESA and the Planck Collaboration) Page 1 of 1 Copyright Page Copyright Page Edited by Helge Kragh and Malcolm S. Longair The Oxford Handbook of the History of Modern Cosmology Edited by Helge Kragh and Malcolm S. Longair Print Publication Date: Mar 2019 Subject: Physical Sciences Online Publication Date: Apr 2019 (p. iv) Copyright Page Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Oxford University Press 2019 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in 2019 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Heber Doust Curtis 1872-1942
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS VOLUME XXII—THIRTEENTH MEMOIR BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIR OF HEBER DOUST CURTIS 1872-1942 BY ROBERT G. AITKEN PRESENTED TO THE ACADEMY AT THE AUTUMN MEETING, 1942 HEBER DOUST CURTIS 1872-1942 BY ROBERT G. AITKEN "Call Dr. Curtis!"—It was gray dawn of a raw December morning on Mount Hamilton, thirty years ago, and our eldest son, home from the university for his Christmas vacation, had roused us, his face drawn and distorted by the agonizing pain in his right abdomen. A word to our physician in San Jose had brought the curt order, "Bring the boy down at once. There's no time to lose. It's probably acute appendicitis." By the time the boy and I were ready for the trip, Dr. Curtis had his automobile at the door and we were off on the three and one-half hour trip over the half-frozen, adobe mud road to San Jose. Surgeon and operating room were ready, and as soon as was humanly possible a highly inflamed appendix, just ready to burst, had been safely removed, and a relieved boy was coming peacefully out from the influence of the anesthetic. Then Dr. Curtis, having first telephoned to the Lick Observa- tory to find out if he could do any town errands for anyone "at the top", started cheerfully back on his long, lonesome drive to the mountain, happy in the thought that he had once again been able to be of service. I tell this story at the beginning of my sketch of the career of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Decade Between 1918 and 1928, Leiden Observatory Changed
    Teach and travel Leiden Observatory and the renaissance of Dutch astronomy in the Interwar years David Baneke1 Introduction On Sunday 3 March 1918 Ernst Frederik van de Sande Bakhuyzen, director of Leiden Observatory, unexpectedly died. Within days Willem de Sitter was appointed acting director, pending further decisions. De Sitter immediately contacted J.C. Kapteyn, the grand old man of Dutch astronomy and his former mentor in Groningen, to discuss the future of the observatory. This was their chance to resurrect the observatory after decades of stagnation. It was also a chance to make astronomy join the ‘second golden age’ of Dutch science that played a prominent role in contemporary cultural nationalism.2 Scientists such as J.D. van der Waals, H.A. Lorentz, Heike Kamerlingh Onnes and Hugo de Vries were considered the direct heirs of Christiaan Huygens and Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, the heroes of the first ‘golden age’ in the seventeenth century. Kapteyn was a national pride too, but he was a lonely figure. He had built his reputation against all odds, having started without any facilities, funding or staff.3 The rest of Dutch astronomy did not share in the successes of the other sciences. The two observatories in Leiden and Utrecht were small and unexciting. A reorganisation and expansion of Leiden Observatory might change that. De Sitter and Kapteyn seized the moment, and they succeeded beyond expectation. During De Sitter’s directorship, from 1918 until 1934, Leiden Observatory changed from a sleepy, run- down institute into an international centre of astronomy.4 It was the home institute of Willem de Sitter, Ejnar Hertzsprung and Jan Oort, and it became a breeding ground for a new generation of astronomers who would become prominent scientists in their own right, including Bart Bok, Gerard Kuiper, Dirk Brouwer, Willem Luyten, Piet Oosterhoff, Willem van den Bos and Adriaan Blaauw.
    [Show full text]