DOCSLIB.ORG

Dissertation Manufacturing Precarity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dissertation Manufacturing Precarity DISSERTATION MANUFACTURING PRECARITY: A CASE STUDY OF THE GRAIN PROCESSING CORPORATION/UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 86D LOCKOUT IN MUSCATINE, IOWA Submitted by Jacqulyn S. Gabriel Department of Sociology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2016 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Douglas Murray Michael Carolan Peter Leigh Taylor Dimitris Stevis Copyright by Jacqulyn S. Gabriel 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT MANUFACTURING PRECARITY: A CASE STUDY OF THE GRAIN PROCESSING CORPORATION/UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 86D LOCKOUT IN MUSCATINE, IOWA On August 22, 2008, approximately 360 workers were locked out of their jobs at Grain Processing Corporation (GPC) in Muscatine, Iowa, after the company and the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 86D failed to negotiate a new collective bargaining agreement at the expiration of their existing agreement. This study examines the GPC/UFCW lockout within the context of the growth of precarious employment in the United States. Using this labor dispute as a case study, it illustrates how lockouts are implicated in the generation of precarious employment and how workers and unions respond when confronted with employment precarity. This study suggests that the steady decline in union membership, density, and collective bargaining power in U.S. manufacturing over the last several decades has placed those manufacturing workers who are still covered by collective bargaining agreements at risk of their employers initiating lockouts as a means to displace and replace them and their jobs with more precarious forms of employment. Indeed, by locking out its bargaining unit employees and replacing them with workers hired through a temporary employment agency, GPC was able to effectively take around 360 relatively well-paid, permanent, unionized manufacturing jobs and turn them into precarious jobs. In doing so, the company also rendered some 360 workers precarious. Thus, in addition to demonstrating how GPC was able to deploy a lockout to achieve ii precarious employment relations, this study examines how the locked out workers and their union responded to the precarious position they were placed in as a result of the labor dispute. This study draws on data gathered primarily through in-depth interviews with a sample consisting of 62 of the approximately 360 locked out workers roughly five and a half years into the GPC/UFCW labor dispute. It summarizes, describes, analyzes, and explains these workers’ experiences both prior to and following the lockout. In doing so, it highlights both the negative and positive effects of the labor dispute from the perspective of those workers who experienced it firsthand. For instance, it reveals a number of difficulties these workers faced as a result of being locked out of their jobs. Yet, it also reveals that most of these workers experienced a rather remarkable “recovery” after ultimately being displaced from their jobs at GPC as a result of the lockout. In fact, the majority of workers in this study who sought reemployment after being locked out by the company were able to secure jobs that were comparable, and in most cases superior, to their jobs at GPC in terms of wages, benefits, and working conditions. I use an inductive approach to analyze and conceptualize the factors that contributed to these workers’ “recovery” from the lockout. This analysis shows that the most important factors in explaining the relatively positive outcome of the labor dispute for a significant number of workers in this study was their social capital and human capital coupled with a favorable local labor market. Overall, this study contributes a worker-centered account of the changing nature and quality of employment relations in the United States. It also contributes to our understanding and analysis of how employment precarity is being generated and how workers and unions are responding to employers’ efforts aimed at achieving precarious employment relations. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the help of many people. I would like to begin by thanking the locked out workers who participated in this study. They welcomed me into their homes and lives and shared their time, thoughts, and experiences with me. Because I promised them confidentiality and anonymity, I cannot acknowledge them personally, but I hope each and every one of them knows how essential they were to this study and how grateful I am for their participation and cooperation. I would also like to thank my advisor, Dr. Douglas Murray, who helped me conceptualize, carry out, and ultimately complete this dissertation. Over the years it has taken me to complete not only this dissertation, but also my doctoral degree, he has continuously offered knowledge, guidance, support, and encouragement. I also want to express many thanks to the rest of my committee members, Dr. Dimitris Stevis, Dr. Michael S. Carolan, and Dr. Peter Leigh Taylor, for their expertise, support, and encouragement throughout my graduate career and in completing this dissertation. In addition, I would like to offer my appreciation to all of the professors at Colorado State University who have played a part in my academic career and success. Finally, I would like to thank my family, friends, and fellow graduate students who were always there for me in whatever capacity I needed them to be as I made my way through graduate school and completing this dissertation. I am genuinely grateful for their unconditional love, encouragement, and generosity. iv DEDICATION This project is dedicated to my family and the other families affected by the GPC/UFCW lockout. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDMENTS ................................................................................................................ iv DEDICATION .................................................................................................................................v CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................1 The GPC/UFCW Lockout....................................................................................................1 The Study’s Contribution to Understanding Precarious Employment ................................3 Overview of this Dissertation .............................................................................................7 CHAPTER TWO: THE RISE OF PRECARIOUS EMPLOYMENT & THE RESHAPING ......... OF U.S. LABOR RELATIONS.....................................................................................................11 Employer Tenure ...............................................................................................................21 Job Displacement Rates .....................................................................................................22 Long-Term Unemployment ...............................................................................................24 Perceived Job Security/Insecurity ......................................................................................25 Risk –Shifting from Employer to Employees ....................................................................30 Nonstandard Work Arrangements & the Temporary Staffing Industry (TSI) ...................33 CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH SRATEGY AND METHODS ...............................................46 Gaining Entrée4 ...................................................................................................................9 Sampling ............................................................................................................................50 Demographic Information ..................................................................................................57 Data Collection ..................................................................................................................58 Supplementary Interviews and Data .................................................................................62 CHAPTER FOUR: EMPLOYER GENERATED PRECARITY ..................................................66 Declining Labor Relations & Fringe Benefits ...................................................................68 Concessionary Bargaining .................................................................................................72 Recovering the Losses in 2008 ..........................................................................................74 Talk of a Strike...................................................................................................................75 Union Members’ Conflicting Interests ..............................................................................76 The Turning Tide ...............................................................................................................78 vi The Two-Tiered System ....................................................................................................80 The Weeks Leading Up to the Lockout .............................................................................83 “Shadowing” the Bargaining Unit .....................................................................................84 The Company’s “Final Offer” ...........................................................................................85
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NJEA Collective Bargaining Manual
    COLLECTIVE BARGAINING MANUAL NEW JERSEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION 180 WEST STATE STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1211 TRENTON, NJ 08607-1211 609 599 5461 NJEA.ORG Barbara Keshishian, President Wendell Steinhauer, Vice President Marie Blistan, Secretary-Treasurer Vincent Giordano, Executive Director Richard Gray, Assistant Executive Director/Research Director NJEA COLLECTIVE BARGAINING MANUAL Collective Bargaining Manual 1 Preface 2 A History of Public Sector Collective Bargaining in New Jersey 6 Is it Negotiable? 9 Landmark Decisions 15 Statutory Basis for School Employee Negotiations in New Jersey 18 Organizing and Planning 23 Selecting a Bargaining Team 25 Data for Negotiations 26 Collective Bargaining Best Practices 27 The Bargaining Process 33 Ratifying the Negotiated Agreement 37 Alternatives to Traditional Bargaining 43 Bargaining Glossary 44 Salary Compensation 46 Salary Guides 54 Salary Guide Profile 56 Salary Guide Negotiation Preparation 67 Salary Guide Construction 70 Salary Guide Length 73 Educational Support Professional Salary Topics 74 Special Topics in Salary Compensation 76 Bargaining Comprehensive Benefits 79 Costing Out Insurance Benefits 81 School Employees’ Health Benefits Plan (SEHBP) 82 Legal Framework for Negotiating Medical Benefits 86 Health Benefits Insurance Glossary 92 Civil Unions/Domestic Partnerships 93 Sick Leave Banks 94 Drug and Alcohol Testing 97 Distance Learning and Technology 98 Bargaining and professional development: Supporting new visions 103 Sample Agreement Table of Contents NJEA COLLECTIVE BARGAINING MANUAL Preface The New Jersey Education Association was 1. This is a resource guide. Its use and application founded on December 28, 1853, as the New Jersey are driven by local circumstances. You may find State Teachers Association. Today, NJEA is the largest that parts are relevant, while others may not be and the most effective school employee organization appropriate for your situation or may need to be in New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Precarity and Capitalism: an Interview with Charlie Post
    Rethinking Precarity and Capitalism | 247 Rethinking Precarity and Capitalism: An Interview with Charlie Post Jordy Cummings1 (JC): The theme of this year’s Alternate Routes is the “paradox of low-wage, no-wage work”, and there is a great deal of analysis of an allegedly new historical subject, “the precariat”. What do you make of this “paradox”? Is capitalism really that different in 2015 than it was 20, 30, 40 years ago? Charlie Post2 (CP): Capitalism is certainly different today than it was during the so-called “Golden Age” of 1945-1975. During those years, “full-employment” – unemployment below the “frictional” rate of 3-4 percent, the dominance of full-time work with unemployment insurance, health care, pensions and the like (provided by the state, private employers, or some combination) – was the norm. This “full-employment” model also included some measure of job security – either legal or contractual protections from arbitrary dismissal, etc. The “Golden Age” was, in my opinion, exceptional in the history of capitalism. It was the product of a combination of a long period of rising profitability (1933-1966) and a militant labor movement across the industrialized world. Workers had threatened the foundations of capitalist rule (France and Spain in the mid-1930s, France and Italy immediately after World War II, France in 1968, Portugal 1974-1975) or severely disrupted capitalist accumulation in mass strike waves in the mid-1930s, immediate post-war years and again between 1965-1975. Capital was forced to make major concessions to labor. The “full-employment” model and the expansive welfare state were the most important gains, giving workers unprecedented security of employment.
    [Show full text]
  • The FLSA Final Overtime Rule ® Issue No.1|September 2016 Policies, Programs, Andservices
    Issue No. 1 | September 2016 ® The FLSA Final Overtime Rule A Resource Guide for Student Affairs Professionals Andrew Q. Morse and Holly M. Asimou OVERVIEW The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Final Overtime Rule has substantially increased the salary threshold for exemption from overtime pay. The effect of the Final Rule will be felt by colleges and universities nationwide; many employees will now be eligible for overtime pay unless their salaries are brought in line with the new $47,476 minimum salary threshold or their hours are confined to 40 hours in a given workweek. These changes, set to take effect December 1, 2016, occur at a time when many institutions face persistent budgetary pressure. Moreover, the Final Rule’s impact on new types of employees not traditionally eligible for overtime pay will create the compliance challenge of tracking irregular hours or discerning between work and nonwork activities for many employees. Leaders in student affairs are not only faced with the responsibility to comply with the (Volume 1, Issue 1) 1, Issue (Volume (Volume 1, Issue 1) 1, Issue (Volume Final Rule, but to also ensure the operational sustainability of their departments or divisions. This resource guide offers a tour through the Final Rule and existing overtime laws and regulations. Further, this guide provides considerations and cautions to support the compliance and management responsibilities of leaders in student affairs. NASPA Policy and Practice Series and Practice Policy NASPA NASPA Policy and Practice Series Series and Practice Policy NASPA 1 1 THE AUTHORS Andrew Q. Morse, PhD, is director for policy research and advocacy with NASPA–Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education’s Research and Policy Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Walkouts Teach U.S. Labor a New Grammar for Struggle
    Walkouts teach U.S. labor a new grammar for struggle This article will appear in the Summer 2018 issue of New Politics. Like the Arab Spring, the U.S. “education Spring,” was an explosive wave of protests. State-wide teacher walkouts seemed to arise out of nowhere, organized in Facebook groups, with demands for increased school funding and political voice for teachers. Though the walkouts confounded national media outlets, which had little idea how to explain or report on the movements, for parent and teacher activists who have been organizing against reforms in public education in the past four decades, the protests were both unexpected and understandable. What was surprising was their breadth of support (state-wide), their organizing strategy (Facebook), and their breathtakingly rapid spread. For most of the far-Right, the West Virginia, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Arizona, and North Carolina walkouts showed greedy public employees exploiting their job security to get pay and benefits better than hard-working taxpayers have. However, teachers won wide popular support, even from Republicans, forcing the media-savvier elements of the Right to alter their tone. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) posted a blog with a sympathetic tone pushing the same stance. “While teachers are justly frustrated by take-home pay, their total compensation is typically a lot higher than many teachers realize. That’s because teacher retirement and health-care systems are much more expensive than those of the taxpayers who pay for them — whether those taxpayers work in the private or public sector.” Shedding crocodile teachers for teachers who are underpaid and retirees without adequate pensions, AEI rejects the idea more school funding would help.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalist Meltdo-Wn
    "To face reality squarely; not to seek the line of least resistance; to call things by their right names; to speak t�e truth to the masses, no matter how bitter it may be; not to fear obstacles; to be true in little thi�gs as in big ones; to base one's progra.1!1 on the logic of the class struggle;. to be bold when the hour of action arrives-these are the rules of the Fourth International." 'Inequality, Unemployment & Injustice' Capitalist Meltdo-wn Global capitalism is currently in the grip of the most The bourgeois press is relentless in seizing on even the severe economic contraction since the Great Depression of smallest signs of possible "recovery" to reassure consumers the 1930s. The ultimate depth and duration of the down­ and investors that better days are just around thecomer. This turn remain to be seen, but there are many indicators that paternalistic" optimism" recalls similar prognosticationsfol­ point to a lengthy period of massive unemployment in the lowing the 1929 Wall Street crash: "Depression has reached imperialist camp and a steep fall in living standards in the or passed its bottom, [Assistant Secretary of Commerce so-called developing countries. Julius] Klein told the Detroit Board of Commerce, although 2 'we may bump along' for a while in returningto higher trade For those in the neocolonies struggling to eke out a living levels " (New Yo rk Times, 19 March 19 31).The next month, on a dollar or two a day, this crisis will literally be a matter in a major speech approved by President Herbert Hoover, of life and death.
    [Show full text]
  • How an Obscure State Law Guarantees Pay Hikes for Government Employees – and Raises the Tax Toll on New Yorkers
    NYS TAXPAYER $$$ T R O U B L E How an obscure state law guarantees pay hikes for government employees – and raises the tax toll on New Yorkers What you’ll learn from this report: ! New York’s 30-year-old “Triborough Amendment” requires public employers to maintain all contractual perks for unionized public employees, including automatic “step” increases in pay, after the expiration of a collective bargaining agreement. ! This law gives unions an incentive to resist negotiating structural changes to their contracts, since the status quo will be preserved even if there is no contract. ! Pay hikes required by the Triborough Amendment cost the state government $140 million a year, despite a “freeze” on base salaries. ! The Triborough Amendment guarantees pay increases for teachers that add almost $300 million a year to school budgets across the state. ! The requirement to finance automatic pay increases has undermined attempts to stretch taxpayer dollars further in a time of extreme financial stress. ! Repeal of the Triborough Amendment would establish a more equitable collective bargaining system in New York’s public sector, preserving basic union rights while giving local officials the tools they now lack to negotiate needed changes to costly and outmoded contracts. Empire Center for New York State Policy ABOUT THE AUTHORS E.J. McMahon is a senior fellow of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Re- search and its Empire Center for New York State Policy. His recent work has focused on state budget issues, tax policy, public pensions, collective bar- gaining and competitive contracting of public services. Terry O’Neil heads the Garden City office of Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, a full-service law firm with one of the most respected labor and em- ployment practices in New York State.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOSSARY of COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TERMS and SELECTED LABOR TOPICS
    GLOSSARY of COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TERMS and SELECTED LABOR TOPICS ABEYANCE – The placement of a pending grievance (or motion) by mutual agreement of the parties, outside the specified time limits until a later date when it may be taken up and processed. ACTION - Direct action occurs when any group of union members engage in an action, such as a protest, that directly exposes a problem, or a possible solution to a contractual and/or societal issue. Union members engage in such actions to spotlight an injustice with the goal of correcting it. It further mobilizes the membership to work in concerted fashion for their own good and improvement. ACCRETION – The addition or consolidation of new employees or a new bargaining unit to or with an existing bargaining unit. ACROSS THE BOARD INCREASE - A general wage increase that covers all the members of a bargaining unit, regardless of classification, grade or step level. Such an increase may be in terms of a percentage or dollar amount. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE – An agent of the National Labor Relations Board or the public sector commission appointed to docket, hear, settle and decide unfair labor practice cases nationwide or statewide in the public sector. They also conduct and preside over formal hearings/trials on an unfair labor practice complaint or a representation case. AFL-CIO - The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations is the national federation of unions in the United States. It is made up of fifty-six national and international unions, together representing more than 12 million active and retired workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Area Apprenticeship Guidebook
    Alameda • Contra Costa • Marin • Napa • San Fransisco • San Mateo • Santa Clara • Solano Bay Area Construction Apprenticeship Guidebook Bay Area Construction Apprenticeship Guidebook View online at www.ctwi-btca.org Produced by Construction Trades Workforce Initiative, with the generous support and collaboration of many organizations and individuals. We would especially like to thank the many union apprenticeship coordinators and training directors across the region who contributed information and reviewed content, as well as pre-apprenticeship leaders who prepared materials for their organizations’ profiles. Key Partners Alameda County Building Contra Costa Napa-Solano & Construction Trades Building & Construction Building & Construction Council Trades Council Trades Council Bay Area Oakland Apprenticeship Coordinators Workforce Development Association Board Special thanks to Jon Bersche and the City of Seattle for providing the model for this project, and for so graciously granting permission to adapt some of their materials. On the Cover Juju Ruiz is a union sheet metal apprentice currently working on installing ductwork for the new BART headquarters near Lake Merritt in Oakland. Although she loved the idea of working in construction, she was unsure about how to pursue this career path. After enrolling and graduating from Rising Sun Center for Opportunity’s all-female MC3 pre-apprenticeship program, Women Building the Bay, Juju felt prepared to enter the construction trades. Now, she feels empowered as a mother and career woman to support her family doing work that she is passionate about. Dear Valued Community Members, Far too many people in the Bay Area are unaware of career opportunities in the union construction trades. As the non-profit partner of the Building and Construction Trades Councils in Alameda, Contra Costa, Napa and Solano counties, Construction Trades Workforce Initiative (CTWI) is the regional leader in bridging the gap between organized labor and community stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • “They Outlawed Solidarity!”*
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Seattle University School of Law: Digital Commons “They Outlawed Solidarity!”* Richard Blum** Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude . shall exist within the Unit- ed States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 984 I. LABOR RIGHTS AND THE PROHIBITION AGAINST INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE…………………………………………………………….987 II. SECONDARY STRIKES AND NLRA ANTISTRIKE INJUNCTIONS ......... 989 A. Statutory Law ............................................................................... 989 B. Scenarios ...................................................................................... 991 C. Remedies ...................................................................................... 994 III. NLRB CEASE AND DESIST ORDERS AGAINST UNIONS AND THEIR MEMBERS .............................................................................................. 994 IV. ANTISTRIKE INJUNCTIONS IMPLICATE THE THIRTEENTH AND FIRST AMENDMENTS EVEN IF WORKERS CAN PERMANENTLY QUIT THEIR JOBS .............................................................................................................. 998 A. Quitting Individually v. Quitting Collectively .............................. 998 B. Quitting En Masse v. Striking ....................................................... 999 C. Secondary Strikes and the Pollock Principle ............................. 1003 D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal and Political Implications of Placing Paid Union Organizers in the Employer's Workplace Victor J
    Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal Volume 16 | Issue 1 Article 1 1998 Salting the Mines: the Legal and Political Implications of Placing Paid Union Organizers in the Employer's Workplace Victor J. Van Bourg Ellyn Moscowitz Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Van Bourg, Victor J. and Moscowitz, Ellyn (1998) "Salting the Mines: the Legal and Political Implications of Placing Paid Union Organizers in the Employer's Workplace," Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal: Vol. 16: Iss. 1, Article 1. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj/vol16/iss1/1 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Van Bourg and Moscowitz: Salting the Mines: the Legal and Political Implications of Placin HOFSTRA LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW JOURNAL Volume 16, No. 1 Fall 1998 ARTICLES SALTING THE MINES: THE LEGAL AND POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PLACING PAID UNION ORGANIZERS IN THE EMPLOYER'S WORKPLACE* Victor J. Van Bourg** Ellyn Moscowitz*** Mr. Chairman .... Thank you for Mr. Chairman, I rise to strongly the opportunity to speak today. I oppose H.R. 3246, mistakenly am here to discuss the serious called the Fairness for Small Busi- * This article was made possible, in part, by a summer research grant from Chapman Uni- versity School of Law, while Ellyn Moscowitz was an Associate Professor of Law there.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Equity in Right-To-Work Law
    Restoring Equity in Right-to-Work Law Catherine L. Fisk & Benjamin I. Sachs* Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 857 I. Reading Section 14(b) ................................................................................................. 860 II. A Genuine Right to Be Nonunion .......................................................................... 866 III. Removing the Obligation to Represent Nonmembers for Free ...................... 874 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 879 INTRODUCTION Under United States labor law, when a majority of employees in a bargaining unit choose union representation, all employees in the unit are then represented by the union and the union must represent all of the employees equally.1 Twenty-four states, however, have enacted laws granting such union-represented employees the right to refuse to pay the union for the services the union is legally obligated to provide.2 Although the name prompts strong objection from union supporters, these laws are known as “right-to-work” laws. Right-to-work laws have been around for decades,3 but they have come to national prominence again as another round of states has enacted the legislation. Michigan—a state with relatively high levels of union density4—enacted a right-to- work statute in 2012, and Indiana became a right-to-work state in 2010.5 As a * The authors are, respectively, Chancellor’s Professor of Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law, and Kestnbaum Professor of Labor and Industry, Harvard Law School. Professor Fisk thanks Daniel Schieffer, and Professor Sachs thanks Ani Gevorkian for excellent research assistance. 1. National Labor Relations Act § 9, 29 U.S.C. § 159(a) (2012). 2. Right to Work Resources, NAT’L CONF. ST. LEGISLATURES, http://www.ncsl.org/issues -research/labor/right-to-work-laws-and-bills.aspx (last visited Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Philadelphia Suburban Contractors Agreement
    AGREEMENT Between BUILDING OPERATORS LABOR RELATIONS DIVISION OF BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA, SUBURBAN SECTION and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ TERM: DECEMBER 16, 2019 TO DECEMBER 15, 2023 SL1 1623715v2 030060.00001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE 1 - Recognition ............................................................................................................. 1 ARTICLE 2 - UNION SECURITY AND CHECK-OFF .............................................................. 3 ARTICLE 3 - DISCHARGE AND DISCIPLINE ......................................................................... 5 ARTICLE 4 - GRIEVANCE/ARBITRATION ............................................................................. 5 ARTICLE 5 - CONTRACTOR TRANSITION ............................................................................ 8 ARTICLE 6 - SENIORITY AND BUMPING .............................................................................. 9 ARTICLE 7 - WORKLOAD/REDUCTIONS............................................................................. 11 ARTICLE 8 - PRIOR BETTER TERMS AND CONDITIONS ................................................. 11 ARTICLE 9 - PICKET LINE/NO STRIKE CLAUSE ................................................................ 12 ARTICLE 10 - LEAVES OF ABSENCE .................................................................................... 12 ARTICLE 11 - VACATIONS ..................................................................................................... 13 ARTICLE
    [Show full text]