DOCSLIB.ORG

Page 1 of 676 11 Mar 2019 15:24:54 Respondent Name Respondent Comment Attached Documents Organisation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Page 1 of 676 11 Mar 2019 15:24:54 Respondent Name Respondent Comment Attached Documents Organisation Local Plan 2036 Issues and Options All Responses and attachments Document Part Name Why do we need a new local plan? Respondent Name Respondent Comment Attached documents Organisation Backwell Parish Backwell Parish Council Council Notwithstanding BPC’s concerns regarding the release of this Issues and Options paper ahead of the Joint Spatial Plan (JSP) examination, it is recognised that this paper is based on the JSP as submitted to the Secretary of State. The submitted JSP remains draft and subject to scrutiny at examination, which will certainly result in modifications to the plan. So, the Local Plan will need to evolve to reflect the adopted version of the JSP rather than the Submission version. For that reason, BPC welcomes the reassurance at page 4 that the Issues and Options document is not a draft plan and so cannot be relied upon by developers or promoters. It should therefore be regarded as an exploration of the issues that could inform the future Local Plan’s spatial strategy, the allocation of land and the delivery of infrastructure, in the event that the JSP is adopted in a form comparable to the Submission version. BPC’s comments on the Issues and Options Paper should be read in that context and without prejudice to the in-principle objection to the Backwell and Nailsea Strategic Development Locations and associated planned infrastructure. Brigly The Local Plan 2036 depends upon the Joint Spacial Plan which seeks to determine housing and other needs. Therefore, until the inspectors have ruled on the JSP, comments on the Local Plan would seem to be untimely. Or to put it another way, putting the cart before the horse. C Allsop I believe that the Issues & Options Document is a bit premature considering that I understand the JSP is still under the consultation phase, and it concern me that the Council is plowing ahead as if it is a fait accompli. Cleeve Parish Council Cleeve Parish Council CPC believe that this consultation is premature for the following reasons; Firstly, the examination on the West of England Authorities Joint Spatial Plan has not yet been carried out. Further consultation on the JSP is to take place in November. CPC is a member of the Parish Councils Airport Association which has submitted a response to the Joint Spatial Plan on the issue of the expansion of Bristol Airport and believe this issue of further growth is non-complaint. CPC understand that many other groups, on other issues, also consider the JSP non-compliant. Although there is a push by all the authorities that the JSP will be adopted, there should be some changes within the Plan once examined. It is our understanding that the JSP will not allocate the new sites for housing but only identify them which allows the new Local Plan to make changes. Secondly, CPC reserve the right to add additional comments to our submission as information is made available on the transport network and proposed green infrastructure. CPC believe that these documents should have been made available at the start of this consultation. Cresten The JSP has not yet been fully formulated or examined, with valid concerns and objections to proposals such as the Churchill SDL.This consultation is premature. Hilary Burn The Local Plan document is unsustainable for the 21 century. It is also premature as the examination in public has not yet taken place on the West of England Joint Spatial Plan. It is unsustainable in that it advocates new roads and housing developments in the wrong location and the expansion of Bristol Airport. Many of the documents to give an informed comment on the Local Plan are unavailable such as the West of England Joint Transport Plan and the Bristol South West Economic Link Report. Page 1 of 676 11 Mar 2019 15:24:54 Respondent Name Respondent Comment Attached documents Organisation Road infrastructure to unsustainable housing developments of Churchill and Backwell may not be affordable, achievable and certainly detrimental to the environment. The Local Plan is premature again with the technical reports on the Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulations of the West of England Joint Spatial Plan not yet published for consultation. Road and rail infrastructure to BristolAirport will only add to the environmental destruction of the locality surrounding Bristol Airport. New roads generate more car traffic which in turn increases carbon emissions and global warming. The aviation sector is the fastest growing source of greenhouse gases yet this wasn’t mentioned in the Plan. Bristol Airport should remain capped at 10 mppa and not allowed to expand. Little in the Local Plan is given on the issue of climate change which will dominate how we live in the future. For instance the plan does not show how carbon emissions from vehicle use will decrease. The West of England documents show that it is necessary to reduce emissions from vehicles; yet, North Somerset has opted to construct housing developments in unsustainable locations and create new roads. This document fails to show or assess alternative options to the housing developments and development of Bristol Airport. Sustainable alternatives to the proposed housing developments are available by building close to Bristol which has jobs close by and less need for new infrastructure. The proposed Plan will bring irreversible ecological damage to the area surrounding Bristol Airport and a major landscape change from a rural environment to one that is urban. jerb44 My comments on this subject were submitted in detail with the JSP. It is inappropriate for this document to be issued at this stage. In summary the proposed housing provisions and sites are unsustainable due to excessive commuting distances from most employment opportunities. A practical location close to the south Bristol ring road does not appear to have received sufficient consideration. JLS This consultation is premature and inappropriate given that the JSP Independent Inspection has not taken place. In addition, the process of commenting is a lengthy process and involves several hours of reading, registering and commenting - something that the majority of people do not have the time or inclination for. JLS This consultation is premature and inappropriate given that the JSP Independent Inspection has not taken place. In addition, the process of commenting is a lengthy process and involves several hours of reading, registering and commenting - something that the majority of people do not have the time or inclination for. K Williams This 'Issues and Options' consultation is inappropriate, premature and prejudges the decisions of the Independent Inspectors at the Public Examination of the West of England Joint Spatial Plan to which I have already responded. This Issues and Options’ consultation presumes that the JSP outcome will be to approve the proposed Garden Villages of Banwell and Churchill/Mendip Spring. No one can predict this outcome. R Waycott The Issues and Options document, and the process of consultation, is seriously flawed for the following reasons; 1/ The Consultation process has required the consultees to be the pro-active party, in that continued ffe ort is required to keep abreast of any developments, updates, or indeed the timescale. Learning to navigate the website is immensely time consuming, and assumes all consultees have computer access. No following up of comments, or evidence that any comments have had any impact on the document, other than acknowledgement of receipt, do not inspire the consultee to respond. 2/ No evidence is shown of any consultation with neighbouring Local Authorities, which when considered in the light of the emerging JSP is not justifiable. Page 2 of 676 11 Mar 2019 15:24:54 Respondent Name Respondent Comment Attached documents Organisation 3/ From meetings tta ended, there is obviously huge confusion amongst the public, between this document and the JSP, not only in terms of the content, but which document has overriding authority. Additionally, the document is premature with regard to the JSP. Roger Key 1. Prematurity 1. The West of England (WoE) Joint Spatial Plan (JSP) has yet to reach the stage of being examined in public. Since the JSP was placed on deposit, inspectors deciding on planning appeals in the WoE have concluded that the JSP is not at an advanced stage of development, so little weight can be placed upon the proposals in the JSP. This will remain the case at least until the JSP has been subjected to public scrutiny and the Inspectors’ report is published. Publication of and consultation on the Issues and Options Document prior to the emergence of the JSP Inspectors’ report, creates confusion amongst NSC residents about the planning process, so it is both unhelpful and premature. 2. If changes to the JSP are recommended, it could well be a wasteful and inefficient use of Council Tax in North Somerset because the consultation process may have to be repeated for a revised version of the emerging NSC plan to 2036. 3. The emerging JSP and I&OD are both informed by documents that assess strategic transport issues. In the case of the JSP, it is supported by a Transport Topic Paper (in turn informed by a Joint Transport Study) that identifies the infrastructure said to be required to mitigate transport impacts arising from the JSP proposals. However, the public has yet to be informed of the transport infrastructure that the WoE local authorities consider will be needed between now and 2026. This is promised in the form of the Joint Local Transport Plan 4 (JLTP4) for which consultation is predicted in January 2019. More specifically, in North Somerset, the Bristol South West Economic Link Study (BRSWEL) is ongoing and the findings have not been made public. As the transport strategy is a crucial part of a spatial plan, it is not reasonable to invite the public to offer comment on the I&OD before both the JLTP4 and BRSWEL work are published.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Topic Paper 5: Natural Environment/Biodiversity
    Wiltshire Local Development Framework Working towards a Core Strategy for Wiltshire Draft topic paper 5: Natural environment/biodiversity Wiltshire Core Strategy Consultation June 2011 Wiltshire Council Information about Wiltshire Council services can be made available on request in other languages including BSL and formats such as large print and audio. Please contact the council on 0300 456 0100, by textphone on 01225 712500 or by email on [email protected]. Wiltshire Core Strategy Natural Environment Topic Paper 1 This paper is one of 18 topic papers, listed below, which form part of the evidence base in support of the emerging Wiltshire Core Strategy. These topic papers have been produced in order to present a coordinated view of some of the main evidence that has been considered in drafting the emerging Core Strategy. It is hoped that this will make it easier to understand how we had reached our conclusions. The papers are all available from the council website: Topic Paper TP1: Climate Change TP2: Housing TP3: Settlement Strategy TP4: Rural Issues (signposting paper) TP5: Natural Environment/Biodiversity TP6: Water Management/Flooding TP7: Retail TP8: Economy TP9: Planning Obligations TP10: Built and Historic Environment TP11:Transport TP12: Infrastructure TP13: Green Infrastructure TP14:Site Selection Process TP15:Military Issues TP16:Building Resilient Communities TP17: Housing Requirement Technical Paper TP18: Gypsy and Travellers 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol Food Networking
    BRISTOL FOOD NETWORK Bristol’s local food update2012 community project news · courses · publications · events march–april Spring is nearly springing. The wild garlic is poking through, the Alexanders are growing vigorously, and it’s feeling very tempting to start sowing things in the veg bed. Across the city, new growing projects are sprouting forth, too. In this issue we hear from Avon Wildlife Trust about ‘Feed Bristol’; the Severn Project who have expanded into Whitchurch; and the Horfield accessible allotment and edible forest, who have their grand opening in April. Please email any suggestions for content of the May–June newsletter to [email protected] by 9 April. Events, courses listings and appeals can now be updated at any time on our website www.bristolfoodnetwork.org Bristol food networking The recent Green Capital ‘Future City We will need volunteers to help: Bristol Independents Day Conversations’ have shown how much n publicise the event 4 July 2012 interest there is in Bristol in food issues n photograph open gardens The Bristol Independents campaign – and how much is going on. There are n assist groups hosting openings, etc is gearing-up to celebrate ‘Bristol some great opportunites coming up this Independents Day’ on 4 July. Volunteers Bristol local food networking sessions year to help Bristol’s food projects and are needed to help: businesses flourish: Volunteers are sought to host monthly n Spread the word meet ups for anyone involved in the Bristol n Talk to traders Get Growing Garden Trail food sector who is working towards a n Get community groups involved, etc 9–10 June 2012 better food system for Bristol.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan Was Adopted on December 16Th 1997
    B RISTOL L OCAL P LAN The city council wishes to thank all the people of Bristol who were involved in planning the future of our city by making comments on the formulation of this Plan. After five years of debate involving consultation, a public local inquiry and modifications, the Bristol Local Plan was adopted on December 16th 1997. The Plan consists of this written statement and a separate Proposals Map. For further information, please contact Strategic and Citywide Policy Team Directorate of Planning, Transport and Development Services Brunel House St George’s Road Bristol BS1 5UY Telephone: 903 6723 / 903 6724 / 903 6725 / 903 6727 Produced by: Planning content The Directorate of Planning, Transport and Development Services Technical Production Technical Services and Word Processing Bureau of the Planning Directorate Graphic & 3-D Design Unit of the Policy Co-ordinator and Chief Executive’s Office Printed by Bristol City Council Contract Services – Printing and Stationery Department, Willway Street, Bedminster GRA1865 20452 P&S Printed on recycled paper ADOPTED BRISTOL LOCAL PLAN DECEMBER 1997 P REFACE The Bristol Local Plan was formally adopted in December 1997 after a long and lively debate involving many thousands of local people and numerous organisations with a stake in the city’s future. Bristol now has up to date statutory planning policies covering the whole city. This Plan will guide development up to 2001 and form the basis for a review taking Bristol into the 21st Century. The Plan sets out to protect open space, industrial land, housing, shopping and local services and to promote the quality of life for all the citizens of Bristol.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol's Local Food Update Scaling-Up Bristol's Urban Agriculture
    BRISTOL FOOD NETWORK Bristol’s local food update community project news · courses · publications · events november–december 2012 The harvest (such as it is) is in, winter is coming, it’s time to order the seed catalogues and to start thinking about how it could all be so much more fruitful next year – not just our own little patches of land, but Bristol as a whole. If this Update has a theme at all, then it’s about the benefits of joining-up – whether that’s literal, physical cooperation across growing sites in Bristol, or in shared learning with great projects from further afield.If you’d like to help us join up more dots in 2013, then we’d love to hear from you. Please email any suggestions for content of the January–February newsletter to [email protected] by 10 December. Scaling-up Bristol’s urban agriculture Mike Lloyd-Jones of the Bristol Pound If you’re interested in any of the themes Farm Link Scheme on developing local that emerged from the ‘scaling-up’ markets using our local currency meeting, or if you’d like to get involved by helping to organise future meetings, or by In the second part of the meeting, the helping develop a ‘Bristol Brand’ please group split into groups, to consider: email us: [email protected] n A ‘Bristol grown’ brand and markets For the full notes of the meeting, go to: n Digital tools for supporting community www.bristolfoodnetwork. level cooperation org/2012/10/15/photo-report-from- n Learning and skills scaling-up-urban-agriculture-event-on- n A plan & central coordinating strategy On 3 October, 50–60 local activists, 3rd-october/ n Bristol grower cooperation growers, and growing enthusiasts got together to address the burning This was a lot to think about in one question: “How do we scale-up urban evening, but we covered a lot of ground agriculture in Bristol?” in a short space of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Decision
    Appeal Decision Hearing held on 29 July 2014 Site visit made on 29 July 2014 by David Nicholson RIBA IHBC an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 22 September 2014 Appeal Ref: APP/D0121/A/14/2213634 Blackrock Villas, Clevedon Road, Portishead, Bristol BS20 8PN • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Mario Ellis against the decision of North Somerset Council. • The application Ref 13/P/0483/F, dated 9 March 2013, was refused by notice dated 8 August 2013. • The development proposed is a zero-carbon four bedroom subterranean dwelling. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed . Applications for costs 2. Applications for costs were made at the Hearing, first by North Somerset Council against Mr Mario Ellis, and then by Mr Mario Ellis against North Somerset Council. These applications are the subject of separate Decisions. Procedural matter 1 3. The recent High Court Judgment in Redhill found that the planning balance to be struck for proposals within the Green Belt should concern any other harm to the Green Belt and not any other harm from other matters, as was previously the case. I have reached my Decision on this basis. Main Issues 4. The main issues are whether the proposed dwelling would: (a) amount to inappropriate development in the Green Belt and, if so, whether very special circumstances exist to clearly outweigh this and any other harm to the Green Belt; (b) amount to sustainable development; and the effects of the proposal on: (c) the character and appearance of the area; (d) highway safety, and; (e) trees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soundness of the Submitted Core Strategy in The
    Wiltshire Local Development Framework Working towards a Core Strategy for Wiltshire Representations received on focussed consultation with officer comments Representations about Wiltshire Core Strategy NPPF November 2012 Table of Contents Representations about the conformity of Wiltshire Core Strategy with the National Planning Policy Framework and Planning policy for travellers ........................................1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................1 Background ..............................................................................................................................1 How to use this document ........................................................................................................1 Tables of Respondents .........................................................................................................2 Table 1 Individuals ...................................................................................................................2 Table 2 Organisations ..............................................................................................................2 Table of Representations ......................................................................................................4 Representations about the conformity of Wiltshire Core Strategy with the National Planning Policy Framework and Planning policy for travellers Representations about the conformity of Wiltshire Core
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol and Bath Green Belt Report
    Bristol and Bath Green Belt Report Land at Black Rock Aston & Co UK LTD 26/11/2018 [email protected] Version Control Date Author Status Notes 23.01.18 JCA Draft 1.02 19.11.18 JCA Draft 1.03 26.11.18 JCA FINAL 1.04 BBC GB Stats Drafted by: JCA Checked by: PJA Date: 25.11.18 Date: 26.11.18 Signed: Jeremy C Aston, BSc (Hons) FRICS Copyright © 2018 Aston and Co UK Ltd All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise, or quoted, or utilised in planning or development applications without the prior permission of Aston and Co UK Ltd. 1 | P a g e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report traces the history of the Bristol and Bath Green Belt (GB) from its origins (1957) to the present and identifies the purpose of the GB within North Somerset (NS) and specifically at Portishead. It discusses its initiation, modification and highlights the Examining Inspectors’ views during its development. The latest GB reviews undertaken by the West of England Joint Spatial Plan (JSP) in 2015 and 2016 and the further detailed site/area specific work undertaken on cell 74c by the Landmark Practice in 2017 are considered. Feedback is also provided by The Landmark Practice on the Landscape Sensitivity Assessment by Wardell Armstrong. The GB initially excluded any of the land being promoted, then included only the western half. During development of GB policy Examining Inspectors questioned the need for some areas at Portishead to be included.
    [Show full text]
  • South Gloucestershire Local Plan 2020 Phase 1 - Issues and Approaches Document (Nov 2020)
    South Gloucestershire Local Plan 2020 Phase 1 - Issues and Approaches Document (Nov 2020) Sustainability Appraisal Report Prepared by LUC November 2020 Project Title: South Gloucestershire Local Plan 2020 Phase 1 Sustainability Appraisal Client: South Gloucestershire Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 17/11/20 Draft for client comment Harry Briggs Kieran Taran Moroney Livingston Kieran Moroney 2 25/11/20 Final draft Harry Briggs Kieran Taran Moroney Livingston Kieran Moroney 3 27/11/20 Final Report Kieran Taran Taran Moroney Livingston Livingston A4 Portrait Report Last saved: 27/11/2020 09:48 South Gloucestershire Local Plan 2020 Phase 1 Document Sustainability Appraisal Report Prepared by LUC November 2020 Planning & EIA LUC BRISTOL Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd th Registered in England Design 12 Floor Colston Tower Edinburgh Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning Colston Street Bristol Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management BS1 4XE Lancaster 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)117 929 1997 London London NW1 1JD GIS & Visualisation [email protected] Manchester FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Contents 1 Introduction 1 Status of the SA Scoping Report (October 2020) 1 Geographical context for the South Gloucestershire Local Plan 2020 1 Outline of the South Gloucestershire Local Plan 2020 2 Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment 3 2 Methodology 8 Stage A: Scoping 9 SA Stage B: Developing and refining options and assessing effects
    [Show full text]
  • Green Belts: a Greener Future
    Green Belts: a greener future A report by Natural England and the Campaign to Protect Rural England Green Belts: a greener future 1 Green Belts: a greener future A report by Natural England and the Campaign to Protect Rural England Established in 1926, Campaign to Protect Rural England is a charity that exists to promote the beauty, diversity and tranquillity of rural England. CPRE’s 2026: Vision for the Countryside, sets out how we believe rural England should look in the year of our centenary. This research and the recommendations set out in this report will help realize our aspirations for the Green Belt. Established by the Government in 2006, Natural England is here to conserve and enhance the natural environment, for its intrinsic value, the wellbeing and enjoyment of people and the economic prosperity that it brings. The evidence presented in this report is expected to support debate on how the Green Belt can deliver more positive benefits to the environment and to people. Acknowledgements CPRE and Natural England acknowledge contributions to this report from the following organisations: TNS UK Ltd 2 Green Belts: a greener future Foreword We have prepared this report to bring together fresh evidence and ideas to inform the debate on the future of England’s Green Belt. The Green Belt covers nearly 13% of England, significant not only because of its extent, but because it provides both a breath of fresh air for the 30 million people living in or near to our largest towns and cities. Green Belt land faces many challenges. It is expected to meet diverse and often conflicting needs, and attracts considerable scrutiny due to the planning controls which govern it and the urban pressures which it faces.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan Pre-Commencement Document Consultation Responses
    North Somerset Local Plan Pre-commencement Document Consultation Responses Respondent Respondent Agent Name Comment Attached documents Name Organisation Brigly Under the heading Housing Requirement it is stated: The overall housing requirement to be accommodated in North Somerset using the standard method as the starting point. What does this mean? Is the council duty bound to allow developers to build more executive homes so that companies like Persimmons get their reward for huge donations to the Tory Party? Or can the council encourage housing that is really needed? ALAN SHAW Mr The scope of the consultation seems to be comprehensive as required however I think that as this has the potential to influence the development of NS for many years to come there should be clear commitment to both consultation and reporting to the wider community ( many of whom may not be involved in this consultation) and to this end full use should be made of the press and of regional meetings where the impact of change will be felt the hardest. Di Hassan I hope that the local plan will look at redrawing settlement boundaries to allow for recent developments and that the ruling will be established that NO developements will be allowed outside of the settlement boundary. Vic Slater 1. Point 10 of the Pre-commencement Document states that "The overall housing requirement to be accommodated in North Somerset using the standard method as the starting point." Page 1 of 328 6 May 2020 11:23:23 Respondent Respondent Agent Name Comment Attached documents Name Organisation Has the starting point referred to been adjusted since the original calculations to take account of BREXIT.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebuttal Proof of Evidence of David Gurtler BA(Hons), BPI, Dipsurv MRTPI Planning and Green Belt
    Appeal by: Bristol Airport Limited Appeal Reference: APP/D0121/W/20/3259234 North Somerset Council Application Reference: 18/P/5118/OUT Rebuttal proof of evidence of David Gurtler BA(Hons), BPI, DipSurv MRTPI Planning and Green Belt Reference: NSC/W7/4 Alpha Planning Ltd Alpha Planning Ltd. Bristol Airport Public Inquiry Rebuttal Planning Proof of Evidence David Gurtler on behalf of North Somerset Council PINS ref: APP/D0121/W/20/3259234 North Somerset ref: 18/P/5118/OUT Alpha Planning Ltd 85 Friern Barnet Lane London N20 0XU www.alphaplanning.ltd.uk CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 II. RESPONSE TO BAL/7/2 APPENDIX A: ‘GREEN BELT ASSESSMENT OF LAND TO THE SOUTH OF BRISTOL AIRPORT’ ................................................ 2 III. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................... 39 APPENDIX A: North Somerset Green Belt Assessment April 2021 APPENDIX B: Photographs from site visit on 18 June 2021 I. INTRODUCTION 1. This rebuttal proof of evidence has been prepared in response to evidence provided by Mr Melling, on behalf of Bristol Airport Limited (“BAL”), on Green Belt matters. 2. Mr Melling’s proof of evidence (BAL/7/2) included Appendix A: Green Belt Assessment of Land to the South of Bristol Airport, since “an assessment of the Green Belt was not previously undertaken by BAL” (paragraph 1.1.2). Accordingly, this rebuttal responds to matters raised in this new piece of work undertaken for BAL. 3. I have structured this rebuttal in table form in order that the response can clearly be seen in relation to the points that Mr Melling has made in his proof of evidence. 4. I have sought to limit this rebuttal proof of evidence as much as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • A Public Survey April 2009
    THE FUTURE OF BRISTOL’S GREEN BELT A Public Survey April 2009 Picture: a view of Green Belt land seen from the edges of Cheltenham in Gloucestershire 1 CPRE: The Future of the Green Belt around Bristol A Public Survey – April 2009 Thank you for your interest in this Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) project. This project is funded by Rufford Maurice Laing. Green Belt is rural land around cities that is protected from excessive housing and other development, thus preventing urban sprawl. Around 13% of land in England is estimated to be in one of the fourteen Green Belt areas. The land is protected by planning and development policies. This survey aims to find out how people think we should use the Green Belt. You could help us shape the future of Green Belts where you live by completing our questionnaire. CPRE is widely recognised as an organisation that is listened to by Government Ministers. Your responses will help CPRE to influence a current Government investigation of how to make the best use of Green Belts and other countryside in the future. About this survey Through this survey we aim to: o Find out your opinions about the most important future uses of the Green Belt. o Discover what a range of people in large towns and cities feel is the main benefit of having countryside next door to where they live. o Raise awareness of the issue of litter and fly-tipping in Green Belt areas (dumping large items such as rubble or sofas in rural areas) and find out what people might be prepared to do to stop it.
    [Show full text]