DOCSLIB.ORG

Stortingsvalget 1989 Percentage of Votes Per Labour Party, Socialist Left Party and Environment and Solidarity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stortingsvalget 1989 Percentage of Votes Per Labour Party, Socialist Left Party and Environment and Solidarity OGES OISIEE SAISIKK 91 SOIGSAGE 199 SOIG EECIO 199 SAISISK SEAYÅ OSO-KOGSIGE 199 IS -537-99- ISS -97 EMEGUE oiiske eme AE EMEO Soigsag Semmea eeseae 3 OO 1 ee uikasoe egge Saisisk seayå am eaee esuae oe agea- kig og oeige a semme ee ai/agise e Soigsage 1 og 11 seeme 199 uikasoe ieoe a ae e oisiee agisee oesik oe maaoeig og age eeseae og aaeeseae o se gag e e me e ae å agkes- iå oe oesiksaee gi a også a iigee soigsag Ekee oesike esee- es i om a emaiske ka Saisisk seayå i seiee gi u e ao me esuae a e ieuueskese som Saisisk seayå oeok i samaei me Isiu o samusoskig sekosue Kåe assee a så o uaeiige a uikasoe Saisisk seayå Oso/Kogsige 7 ai 199 Ae Oe a yugie 4 EACE e ae o eecoa aiciaio (eecoa uou a isiuio o oes y ay/is a e Geea Eecio o e owegia Soig o 1 a 11 Seeme 199 ae esee i is uicaio A eo o e esus o a ieiew suey caie ou y e Cea ueau o Saisics i cooeaio wi e Isiue o Socia eseac wi e uise ae is uicaio as ee eae y Kae assee Cea ueau o Saisics Oso/Kogsige 7 Ai 199 Ae Oe a yugie 5 IO Sie iguegise 7 aeegise 7 ekse 1 Oegg og geomig 9 11 Guag o saisikke 9 1 Omag 9 2. eikie og usikkee e esuaee 9 1 aiees semmea 9 Agie og okasee semme 9 3 ege og keemeke 1 31 Semmee 0 3 aie og oisiee agise 1 33 Osig a eesise 1 3 age eeseae 11 35 Geag og yag a eeseaee 11 3 Agie okasee og gokee semme 11 37 asee 11 3 Kommuekassiiseig sea ie 11 39 Semmea o A ie/ae maae 2 31 yes- /a gkesoysige 2 311 Ae mekae 2 4. oe oeesuae 2 eks å egesk 13 igue 17 aee 20 eegg 1 Maaoeige 8 2. e oisiee agisee i 199 8 3 Skema e Soigsage 199 139 4. e eksaoie kommuesyeage i 199 i Asko ae og Gaua 4 Ukome uikasoe iigee ukomme A emeomAe 4 uikasoe se u a Saisisk seayå ee 1 aua 199 1 Saae o osk saisikk (SS 151 Saaeg i aee a ka ikke oekomme - u Mie e 5 a e uke eee 6 COES age Ie o igues 8 Ie o aes 8 e 1 Suey esig 13 11 Saisica asis 13 1 Coeage 13 2. Eos a eiaiiy o esimaes 13 1 ume o oes o eac ay 13 oes cas a eece 13 3 ems a aiaes 1 31 e ig o oe 1 3 aies a oicia eecoa iss 1 33 eisiuio o oes om oi iss amog aies 1 3 eeseaies o e Soig 15 35 e-eece a ewy eece eeseaies 15 3 oes cas oes eece a ai oes 15 37 egios 15 3 Cassiicaio o muiciaiies 15 39 Sea magis 15 31 aa om oig oes/ua isics 1 311 Misceaeous 1 4. Some mai esus 1 igues 17 aes 20 Aees 1 Aocaio o seas 1 2. e oicia eecoa iss i 199 9 3 Quesioaie Soig eecio 199 139 4. e eaoiay muicia couci eecio i 199 i Asko ae a Gaua 13 uicaios eiousy issue o e suec 15 uicaios issue y e Cea ueau o Saisics sice 1 auay 199 1 Saas o owegia Saisics (SS 151 Eaaio o Symos i aes . Caegoy o aicae - i ess a 5 o ui emoye 7 IGUEGISE Sie 1 Ae semme å e oske Aeieai Sosiaisisk eseai og ykesisee o Mi og Soiaie ose yke Soigsage 199 17 2. Ae semme a emskisaie og ye ose yke Soigsage 199 17 3 Eig a 195 i 199 i e oske Aeieais ae a semmee oseoeg yke 1 4. Eig a 195 i 199 i yes ae a semmee oseoeg yke 1 5 Ae semme a aiee 195 og 199 19 6. Ae semme ia aiee Kommuees seaie 199 19 AEEGISE e I Sammeagsaee Soigsage 199 se i sammeeg me iigee soigsag 1 esoe me semmee agie semme og ageakig i ose Soigsagee 195-199 20 2. Gokee semme ee ai/agise eesise oOs ose Soigs- agee 199-199 20 3 Eig a 195 i 199 i aiees/agisees oseae a gokee semme yke oseoeg 1 4. eeseae og gokee semme eesea yke Soigsagee 191-199 22 5 Geag og yag a eeseaee Soigsagee 195-199 22 6. age eeseae ee ai/agise og kO Soigsagee 195-199 3 7 Eig a 195 i 199 i age eeseae ee ai/agise og k yke 24 8. Geomsisae o age eeseae og aaeeseae ee ai/agise Soigsagee 195-199 5 e II eaee aee Soigsage 199 9 esoe me semmee agie okasee og gokee semme ageakig i ose og ae a semmesee Kommue Soigsage 1 og 11 seeme 199 26 1 Gokee semme ee ai/agise Kommue 3 11 Gokee semme ee ai/agise ose Kommue 5 1 esoe me semmee agie semme ageakig i ose gokee semme gokee semme ee ai/agise i ose ase/kommuekasse/seaie/ kommuesOese 66 13 Kommuee soe ee aiees ae a gokee semme ose 68 1 age eeseae ee ai/agise og kei yke 7 15 ai/agise som ok sise ykesmaa og magee semme o ae aie/ag- ise (geismagie ose a aies semmea yke 71 1 Ose uoeai i ykesmaa og egag i semmea som Oe i a a ykesmaa (asmagie ose a ykesaies semmea yke 7 17 Semme o å ie/ae ueigsmaa ose a aies semmea 73 1 aie me ueigsmaae og magee semmea o ykesaiee o a a e sise ueigsmaae som aie ikk a asasis ose a ykesaies semme- a 7 19 ykesaie som e ie e sise ueigsmaae som aie ikk å asasis ee egag i semmea som e i a a ee maae ose a ykesaies semmea 75 20. age eeseae ee ae og ai/agise 75 1 Gokee semme ee ai/agise ose ye/agkes i uage kommue 7 8 IE O IGUES age 1 eceage o oes e aou ay Sociais e ay a Eiome a Soiaiy Couy Soig eecio 8 17 2. eceage o oes e ogess ay a Coseaie ay Couy Soig eecio 8 17 3 Cages om 8 o 8 i e aou ays eceage o oes eceage ois Couy 8 4. Cages om 8 o 8 i e Coseaie ays eceage o oes eceage ois Couy 8 5 eceage o oes e ay 8 a 8 19 6. eceage o oes e ay accoig o cea o ouyig osiio o muiciaiy Soig eecio 8 19 IE O AES a I Summay aes e Soig eecio 199 see i associaio wi eaie Soig eecios 1 esos eie o oe oes cas a eceage uou Soig eecios 48 20 2. eceage isiuio o ai oes y ay/eecoa is eisiuio o oes cas o oi iss Soig eecios 48 20 3 Cages i e eceage o ai oes o aies/eecoa iss om 8 o 8. Couy eceage ois 2 4. ume o eeseaies a ai oes e eeseaie Couy Soig eecios 68 22 5 e-eecio o eeseaies a is eecio Soig eecios 68 22 6. Eece eeseaies y ay/eecoa is a se Soig eecios 48 2 7 Cages om 8 o 8 i umes o eece eeseaies y ay/eecoa is a se Couy 24 8. Aeage age o eece eeseaies a euy eeseaies y ay/eecoa is Soig eecios 68 . 2 a II eaie aes e Soig eecio 199 9 esos eie o oe oes cas oes eece a ai oes eceage uou a ume o oig saios Muiciaiy Soig eecio 0 a Seeme 8 26 1 ai oes y ay/eecoa is Muiciaiy 6 11 ai oes y ay/eecoa is eceages Muiciaiy 6 1 esos eie o oe oes cas eceage uou ai oes ai oes y ayeecoa is i eceages. egioye o muiciaiyceaiysie o muiciaiy 66 . Muiciaiies accoig o e eceages o oes 68 4. Eece eeseaies y ayeecoa is a se. Couy 0 . ayeecoa is o wi as couy sea (magis o gai. ume o aiioa oes eee y e oe aies o caue e sea. Aiioa oes eee as ece age o e oes o e ayeecoa is. Couy 71 6. Comeig ay o as couy sea, a ume o oes o ose couy sea (magi o oss. oes as eceages o oa oes o e couyee ay. Couy 2 . oes o wiose sea a age. eceage o e oes o e ay 73 8. Aocaio o seas a age wii aies a aiioa oes eee o aies a couy ee o wi seas a age aocae a aioa ee. eceage o e oes o e couyee ay 4 . Couyee aies wi e as sea a age aocae o e ay a aioa ee, y eucio i ume o oes a eas o oss o is sea. eceages o e ume o oes 75 20. Eece eeseaies y age a ayeecoa is 75 2. ai oes y ay/eecoa is eceages Ua isic/oig oe i seece muiciaiies 6 9 1 OEGG OG GEOMOIG 11 Guag o saisikke Saisikke o Soigsage 1 og 11 seeme 199 ygge å oysige a agsy- ee Koeksoe som ykesagsyee oeok e iaeie Ogaee e iee me emme i agoes § og ee umak a Kommua- og aeiseaemee Oysigee i ae 5 om yag og geag a eeseae e iee a Soige agkesoysigee e ase A e akuee kommuees ege saisikk 1 Omag Saisikke omae agesuaee o ae kommuee Ogaeskemae som e ye e is i eegg 3 A ee g e am ike oysige som e same i a agsyee I moseig i iigee e agsyee ee gag ikke e om A oee agie semme ee kO Oseså e age eeseaee e iee a Soige o e em sOse kommuee ises agsaisikk å yes-/agkesiå 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stortingsvalget 1985
    OGES OISIEE SAISIKK 59 SOIGSAGE 195 EE SOIG EECIOS 195 oume I SAISISK SEAYÅ OSO KOGSIGE 19 IS -537-31- ISS -91 EMEGUE oiiske eme AE EMEO Soigsag Semmeai eeseae OO I ee uikasoe egge Saisisk SeayS am eaee esuae oe agea- kig og oeige a semme ee ai/agise e Soigsage og 9 seeme 195 uikasoe ieoe a ae e oisiee agisee oesik oe maaoeig age eeseae og aaeeseae oe oesiksaee gi a også a iigee soigsag Ekee oesike esee- es i om a emaiske ka yåe i seiee gi u e ee II me esuae a e ieuuesøkese som Saisisk Seayå oeok i samaei me Isiu o samusoskig øsesekeæ Eyi Seekke a sS o uaeiige a uikasoe Saisisk Seayå Oso/Kogsige 1 mas 19 Ae Oie a yugie EACE is uicaio coais aa o o a isiuio o ai oes a e Soig Eecios 8 a Seeme 8. A seco oume o e Soig Eecios wi e uise ae, eseig esus om a ieiew same suey. is uicaio as ee eae y Eyi Seekke. Cea ueau o Saisics, OsoKogsige, 8 Mac 86 Ae Oe a yug e IO Sie iguegise 7 aeegise 7 ekse 1 Oegg og geomøig 9 11 Guag o saisikke 9 1 Omag 9 2. eikie og usikkee e esuaee 9 3 ege og keemeke 9 31 Semmee 9 3 aie og oisiee agise 1 33 iseou 1 3 Oøsig a eesise 11 35 age eeseae 11 3 Geag og yag a eeseaee 11 37 Agie semme 11 3 asee 11 39 Kommuekassiiseig 11 31 Ae mekae 1 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Ihlen (2004) Rhetoric and Resources
    For my parents Abstract The aim of this dissertation is to discuss the influence that organizations have on public policies through their rhetoric and use of resources. The empirical focus is on public relations strategies regarding the public policy area on energy and the environment. Two case studies are conducted, centering on what have been the two most controversial environmental conflicts in Norway; the first concerns a hydroelectric development and the second relates to the building of gas-fired power plants. The environmentalists lost the first conflict, whereas the latter plants have still not been built. The theoretical starting point for the dissertation is within the realm of rhetorical studies of public relations, but it is argued that these studies have seldom contained specific suggestions for how to go about broad-based analyses. Furthermore, it is claimed that the studies have remained ontologically underdeveloped, which means that they do not offer analytical frameworks that make it possible to account adequately for organizational actors’ influence on, for instance, matters of public policy. The dissertation thus contains a suggestion for a heuristic analytical device drawing on a wide range of rhetorical concepts, combined with a sociological analysis of resources like economic capital, degree of institutionalization, knowledge, networks, and social standing. Historical reconstructions are made of the two cases. The research material is a sample of public relations material from the organizational actors, including brochures and advertisements, but also other texts, such as applications for building permits, and comments made to newspapers. Furthermore, qualitative interviews were conducted with representatives of the organizations involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Bomb Target Norway
    Bomb target Norway About Norwegian political history in a tragic background, the background to the Norwegian fascism. Militarism and na- tionalism are the prerequisites for fas- cism. By Holger Terpi Norway is a rich complex country with a small wealthy militarist and nationalist upper class, a relatively large middle class and a working class. The little known Norwegian militarism has always been problematic. It would censorship, war with Sweden, occupy half of Greenland1, was opponent of a Nordic defense cooperation, garden Norway into NATO2 and EEC, would have plutonium and nuclear weapons3, as well as, monitor and controlling political opponents, in- cluding the radical wing of the labor movement, pacifists and conscientious objectors. And they got it pretty much as they wanted it. One example is the emergency law or emergency laws, a common term for five laws adopted by the Storting in 1950, which introduced stricter measures for acts that are defined as treacherous in war, and also different measures in peacetime, such as censorship of letters, phone monitoring etc.4 1 Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (Den. v. Nor.), 1933 P.C.I.J. (ser. A/B) No. 53 (Apr. 5) Publications of the Per- manent Court of International Justice Series A./B. No. 53; Collection of Judgments, Orders and Advisory Opinions A.W. Sijthoff’s Publishing Company, Leyden, 1933. 2 Lundestad , Geir: America, Scandinavia, and the Cold War 1945-1949. Oslo, University Press, 1980. - 434 pp. Paradoxically, according to Lundestad, the U.S. preferred socialist governments in Scandinavia rather than conservative, the reason was that they were perceived as "the strongest bulwark" against communism 3 Forland, Astrid: Norway’s nuclear odyssey: from optimistic proponent to nonproliferator.
    [Show full text]
  • FORMAL COMPLAINT VS the KINGDOM of NORWAY 1 by Wilh
    United Nations petition — incomplete report Date: April ……. , 2009 Plaintiff: Surname: Winther First names: Wilhelm Werner Gender: Male Birthplace/-date: NO-Ålesund — May 17, 1963 Nationality: Norwegian Present address: Åsen 4, NO-6270 Brattvåg, Norway Contact information: Norwegian authorities should send their communications/representatives etc to my counsellor in NO-Ålesund, Mr Johs. A ASPEHAUG (P.O Box 837, 6001 Ålesund [PRV: Kipervikg. 5 — ―Grimmergården‖ — Ålesund]). Due to persistent, dangerous and totally illegal harassment and interference from Norwegian authorities, representatives from foreign governments, human rights organizations and tribunals etc should apply couriers satisfyingly identifying themselves as authentic messengers — no letters should be forwarded through, e.g, the official postal services of Norway (i.e ―Posten Norge BA‖) or DHL, and no confidential information should be transferred by telecommunication or direct consultation with aforesaid counsellor (Mr Aspehaug is trustworthy enough, but his office etc ‘ve been unlawfully surveilled by Norwegian author- ities for years). Norwegian authorities are much likely to v.g; obstruct phone calls, steal telefac- similes/letters, erase e-mails and to bug/surveil/eavesdrop clothes, luggage, PCs, calculators, cellular phones, hotel rooms, restaurants, shops, public health facili- ties, libraries, closed sessions, cars/taxicabs, parks and — pet animals etc. 1 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 1 by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete
    [Show full text]
  • The Know Norwaybook
    International and Comparative Studies in Education and Public Information Norway is a country of winter darkness and midnight sun, advanced technology, small towns and a few cities. It has a big The Know NORWAY Book government sector, free education and Background for Understanding the Country and Its People health services, and a modern and dynamic private sector. Pakistan and Afghanistan Edition Norway is home to large communities of Pakistani, Afghan and other immigrants and refugees. Norway is one of the world’s richest and most egalitarian societies. The country’s beauty has made tourism a major income-earner, and fishing, shipping and shipbuilding industries are still important. In the last generation, North Sea oil and gas production has made Norway one of the world’s largest oil exporters – and the Norwegians are now nicknamed “the blue-eyed sheikhs”. PRINTED IN PAKISTAN Mr.Books Atle Hetland Mr.Books Sang-e-Meel Sang-e-Meel The Know NORWAY Book Background for Understanding the Country and Its People Pakistan and Afghanistan Edition Atle Hetland Published in 2010 by Mr. Books Publishers and Booksellers, Islamabad, Pakistan www.mrbook.com.pk ISBN 969-516-166-9 This book, or part thereof, may not be reproduced in print or electronlic form without the permission from the author. Sections may, however, be reproduced for internal use by educational and research institutions and organizations, with reference given to the book. Copyright © Atle Hetland 2010 All rights reserved Author: Atle Hetland English Language and Editorial Consultant: Fiona Torrens-Spence Graphic Artist and Design: Salman Beenish Views expressed and analyses in this publication are those of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Norsk Romani-/Taterpolitikk Fortid, Nåtid, Fremtid
    Norsk romani-/taterpolitikk Fortid, nåtid, fremtid En menneskerettslig vurdering av hovedtrekk i norsk politikk i forhold til romanifolket/taterne. Den norske Helsingforskomité Tordenskioldsgt. 6 B 0166 Oslo Sammendrag og konklusjoner Den norske Helsingforskomité engasjerte seg i romanifolkets/taternes situasjon tidlig på 1990-tallet. Dette engasjementet var medvirkende til at det ble igangsatt forskning om romanifolkets historie og situasjon i Norge. Romanifolket/taterne var utsatt for en intens assimileringspolitikk fra norske myndigheters side fra andre halvdel av 1800-tallet og gjennom store deler av 1900-tallet. Tidlig på 1990-tallet stod for første gang personer fra romanifolket/taterne frem og ville ha dokumentasjon av hva denne politikken hadde ført med seg av overgrep. Initiativet ble først rettet mot Den norske Helsingforskomité og “la vekt på brudd på menneskerettigheter. Etter noen avklaringsrunder gjorde Sosial- og helsedepartementet det klart at det var innstilt på å bevilge midler til en undersøkelse av politikken overfor romanifolket, men at midlene skulle forvaltes av Norges forskningsråd.” 1 Forskningen konsentrerte seg om sterilisering, bortsetting av barn, erfaringer til personer av romani-/taterslekt som ble direkte berørt av sterilisering eller anbringelse på barnehjem og et prosjekt som “belyste den enkeltes opplevelser og erfaringer med å tilhøre romanifolket”. 2 Vi er derfor i den heldige situasjon at det finnes gode forskningsrapporter og bøker om viktige sider ved den norske assimileringspolitikken, selv om mange detaljer og lokale historier fortsatt er ubeskrevet. Og fortsatt mangler en menneskerettslig vurdering av overgrepene mot personer fra romanifolket/taterne. Særlig vil det være av verdi å utrede hvordan tiltak som hørte hjemme i den norske statens program for å håndtere “problemet med de reisende” må ses i lys av de menneskerettighetsforpliktelser Norge har påtatt seg i FN og Europarådet.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Immigration and Immigration Policy in Scandinavia
    I Determinants of Immigration and Immigration Policy in Scandinavia Skender Tunuzliu Masters in Political Science Faculty of Social Sciences University of Oslo Autumn 2019 Word count: 21311 Determinants of Immigration and Immigration Policy in Scandinavia II © Skender Tunuzliu 2019 Determinants of Immigration and Immigration Policy in Scandinavia http://www.duo.uio.no Print: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo III IV Abstract The current study examined critical factors shaping immigration and immigration policies in Scandinavia. Scandinavian countries were selected for this study because they continue to experience high immigration rates more than any other region in the world. The study was guided by the following key research questions: What are the immigration policy requirements across the Scandinavia countries? And what are the critical factors influencing immigration and immigration policy in Scandinavia? A comparative design was used to compare different aspects of immigration across the three countries. The qualitative method was also adopted to facilitate the collection and analysis of detailed data from secondary sources. The results indicate that politics, press media, interest groups, socio-economic factors, and public preferences and opinions are the main factors shaping immigration and immigration policies. Notable among these countries is Denmark with an exclusively restrictive immigration policy against asylum and family immigration since the early 1980s. On the contrary, Norway and Sweden have experienced a shift to both restrictive and liberal immigration policies. The study recommends a shift towards a moderate immigration policy in Scandinavia. V Acknowledgments This thesis would not be possible without the help of my family and friends. You have supported and been patient with me during this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Bokutdrag – Lokalkontorer, Vedlegg2
    200 i strid for fred VEDLEGG 2 FREDSKONTORETS LOKALKONTORER PLASSERING OG MEDVIRKNING Oversikten over medarbeidere ved kontorene er langt fra fullstendig STED OG ADRESSE NOEN AV MEDARBEIDERNE STAVANGER Sonja Lid og Lars Andr. Larssen (ledere), Lars Gunnar Lingås (1967-68), Lagårdsveien 19, Torgunn Gripsrud, Bodil Bjørnstad, Svein Olav Larsen, Anne-Sofie Nag, 4000 Stavanger Håkon C. Pedersen, Valborg Tjora, Rakel Lapin, Abrahamsen, Torborg og Arnt Bækholt, Jacob Margido Esp, Arne Fjørtoft, Bente Gahnstrøm, Helge Fritzen. OSLO Sonja Lid og Lars Andr. Larssen (ledere), Monica Lagerborg, Arnhild Kihl, Kr. Augustsgate 19. Marit Bakke, Sverre Røed-Larsen, Bjørn Dag Gundersen, Marit Sørby, Oslo Maj-Lis Skrede, Torbjørn Helge, Anne Hjort-Larsen, Roger Bodin, Inger Foss, Arild Batzer, Fred Schønning Andreassen, Geir Johnsen, Ulf Nestvold, Kyriakos Chrysostomidis, Svein Hansen, Sidsel Mørch. FREDRIKSTAD Ivar Johansen, Jens Olav Simensen, Arne Josefsen, Magne Christiansen, Nygårdsgate 20, Leif Eriksen, Helge Jansson, Lisbeth Olsen, Kirsti Kristiansen, Sverre Fredheim, 1600 Fredrikstad Ole Gunnar Monsen. HAMAR Gunnar Olsen, Marianne Noodt. Ring gate 252, 2301 Hamar LILLEHAMMER Lars Gunnar Lingås (Våren 1967), Magne Bjørnerud, Thv. Ericsensvei 3, Ingar Johansen, Sidsel Mørck, Erik Hansveen. 2600 Lillehammer GJØVIK Bjørn Sivesind, Michael Hall, Ingvar Grastveit, Postboks 125, Knut Selsjord, Sverre Fredheim 2801 Gjøvik VESTFOLD/TØNSBERG/ SANDEFJORD: Inger Dag Steen, Vidar Ystad, Magnus og Unn Lund, SANDEFJORD Odd Kvanvik, Per Kvanvik, Ernst Evertsen, Torbjørn Berthling Hansen, Dronningensgate 9, Rolf Thoresen, Jan Erik Granlund, Helene Strand Johansen. 3200 Sandefjord GRENLAND/SKIEN Ragnar Olsen, Rolf Wergeland, Arild Batzer, Andreas Hompland, Postboks 345, Helge Fritzen, Ansgar Paulsen, Jardbjørg Krokan Stang, Arne Borgeraas, 3701 Skien Douglas Draper. ARENDAL Helga Lid Ball, Berit Moen, Harald Moen, Alfhild Pedersen, Arne Pedersen.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Right Narratives and Norwegian
    RADICAL RIGHT NARRATIVES AND NORWEGIAN COUNTER-NARRATIVES IN THE DECADE OF UTØYA AND BÆRUM SOLO-ACTOR ATTACKS The CARR-Hedayah Radical Right Counter Narratives Project is a year-long project between CARR and Hedayah that is funded by the EU STRIVE programme. It is designed to create one of the first comprehensive online toolkits for practitioners and civil society engaged in radical right extremist counter-narrative campaigns. It uses online research to map nar- ratives in nine countries and regions (Australia, Canada, Germany, Hungary, New Zealand, Norway, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and the United States), proposes counter-narratives for these countries and regions, and advises on how to conduct such campaigns in an effec- tive manner. This country report is one of such outputs. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Dr. Mette Wiggen is a lecturer in the School of Politics and International Studies (POLIS) at the University of Leeds. She teaches on the Extreme Right in Europe, and politics for the Introduction to Social Sciences foundation course aimed at Widening Participation- and international social science students at Leeds. Mette is the Widening Participation Officer for the University’s Social Science Cluster where she engages with non traditional students who are exploring and entering higher education. She has taught languages and politics, in Norway and the UK, with guest lectures and conference papers in Egypt, Spain, Portugal, The Netherlands, Norway, UK and USA. Mette has also given papers at teaching and learning conferences in the UK on intercultural communication, on student lead discussion groups and on how to engage with students and teach the undergraduate dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • VELFERD ELLER SKATTESTOPP Har Norge En Rødgrønn Regjering I Blå Tvangstrøye?
    saf POLITISK ANBEFALING NR. 2 – 2010 VELFERD ELLER SKATTESTOPP Har Norge en rødgrønn regjering i blå tvangstrøye? 1 politisk anbefaling nr 2–2010 Kr. Augusts gt 11, Tullinløkka • [email protected] • www.manifestanalyse.no 2 VELFERD ELLER SKATTESTOPP ALTERNATIV TIL INNSTRAMMING AV VELFERDEN ARBEIDERPARTIETS RØDGRØNNE valgkampanje i 2005 lovet å ruste opp skolene, fylle opp bassengene og rette opp i en håpløs situasjon for velferdsøkonomien skapt ved Høyre- styrets lavskattpolitikk under regjeringen Bondevik (2001 – 2005). Fortvilelse over at fellesskapets velferd fikk trange kår mens privat rikdom vokste uhemmet blant de heldige, var en viktig grunn til at valgvinden blåste de rødgrønnes vei. Etter to år preget av krisehåndtering i kjølvannet av global finanskollaps, er velferdens vilkår tilbake på politikkens dagsorden for fullt. • Fellesskapsverdiene forvitrer, forteller VG. Politiske myndigheter har latt veier, kloakknett og annen infrastruktur forvitre så lenge at etterslepet i vedlikehold kan være så omfattende som 800 milliarder kroner.1 • I det rødgrønne Norge har hver tredje kommune planlagt kutt innen skole og omsorg i 2010.2 Et eksempel: «Omsorgssektoren i Sandnes skal spare 25 millioner kroner uten å legge ned avdelinger. Det betyr mer tid i sengen og mindre tid til stell og sosiale aktiviteter, samt en større belastning på de ansatte.»3 Dette er virkeligheten svært mange opplever – lokalavisene renner også i år over av slike oppslag. • Politiet er kåret til budsjettvinner og satsingsområde, men så rapporterer VG i februar at politiet over hele landet kutter totalt 360 stillinger i år. «Nyutdannede politifolk har oppsøkt NAV og må gå på ledighetstrygd fordi de ikke får jobb.» Bare i Hordaland politidistrikt må det nedbemannes med 72 årsverk.
    [Show full text]
  • European Race Audit
    EUROPEAN RACE AUDIT BRIEFING PAPER NO.5 - SEPTEMBER 2011 Breivik, the conspiracy theory and the Oslo massacre Contents (1) The conspiracy theory and the Oslo massacre 1 (2) Appendix 1: Responses to the Oslo massacre 14 (3) Appendix 2: Documentation of anti-Muslim violence and other related provocations, Autumn 2010-Summer 2011 18 In a closed court hearing on 25 July 2011, 32-year-old But, as this Briefing Paper demonstrates, the myths that Anders Behring Breivik admitted killing seventy-seven Muslims, supported by liberals, cultural relativists and people on 22 July in two successive attacks in and Marxists, are out to Islamicise Europe and that there is a around the Norwegian capital – the first on government conspiracy to impose multiculturalism on the continent buildings in central Oslo, the second on the tiny island of and destroy western civilisation, are peddled each day Utøya, thirty-eight kilometres from Oslo. But he denied on the internet, in extreme-right, counter-jihadist and criminal responsibility, on the basis that the shooting neo-Nazi circles. In this Briefing Paper we also examine spree on the Norwegian Labour Party summer youth certain intellectual currents within neoconservativism camp, which claimed sixty-nine lives, was necessary to and cultural conservatism. For while we readily admit wipe out the next generation of Labour Party leaders in that these intellectual currents do not support the order to stop the further disintegration of Nordic culture notion of a deliberate conspiracy to Islamicise Europe, from the mass immigration of Muslims, and kick start a they are often used by conspiracy theorists to underline revolution to halt the spread of Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • Report from Turkey's Parliamentary Elections 3 November 2002
    Report from Turkey’s Parliamentary Elections rd 3 November 2002 RKR Norwegian Norwegian Helsinki Council for the Rights of the Kurdish People Committee Preface As human rights NGOs our two organisations have followed the development of Turkey for several years, albeit from different perspectives. We have shared concerns for human rights and democracy in Turkey, and we have tried to help the development within our limited capacities. The Norwegian Council for the Rights of the Kurds aims at informing the Norwegian public about the situation of Kurdish people, and to move Norwegian authorities into action to protect persons of Kurdish decent from the grave human rights violations that too often takes place in the various states inhabited by Kurds. Turkey is no exception. The Norwegian Helsinki Committee has developed contacts with Turkish NGOs, academics and other concerned persons in Turkey that work for human rights. It has undertaken fact- finding missions and has reported on the situation within the field of freedom of religion. Presently the committee co-operates with the Human Rights Foundation on projects. We hope that the present report will provide a useful background to the interested reader, foremost to Turkish authorities and others who monitor human rights and democracy in Turkey. We also believe the report will help the build up of an institutional memory of our two organisations and that of other entities committed to election observation. These elections brought tremendous political change, as the Justice and Development Party (AKP) won a landslide victory; it received 34 percent of the vote and took 363 seats.
    [Show full text]