DOCSLIB.ORG

Stortingsvalget 1985

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stortingsvalget 1985 OGES OISIEE SAISIKK 59 SOIGSAGE 195 EE SOIG EECIOS 195 oume I SAISISK SEAYÅ OSO KOGSIGE 19 IS -537-31- ISS -91 EMEGUE oiiske eme AE EMEO Soigsag Semmeai eeseae OO I ee uikasoe egge Saisisk SeayS am eaee esuae oe agea- kig og oeige a semme ee ai/agise e Soigsage og 9 seeme 195 uikasoe ieoe a ae e oisiee agisee oesik oe maaoeig age eeseae og aaeeseae oe oesiksaee gi a også a iigee soigsag Ekee oesike esee- es i om a emaiske ka yåe i seiee gi u e ee II me esuae a e ieuuesøkese som Saisisk Seayå oeok i samaei me Isiu o samusoskig øsesekeæ Eyi Seekke a sS o uaeiige a uikasoe Saisisk Seayå Oso/Kogsige 1 mas 19 Ae Oie a yugie EACE is uicaio coais aa o o a isiuio o ai oes a e Soig Eecios 8 a Seeme 8. A seco oume o e Soig Eecios wi e uise ae, eseig esus om a ieiew same suey. is uicaio as ee eae y Eyi Seekke. Cea ueau o Saisics, OsoKogsige, 8 Mac 86 Ae Oe a yug e IO Sie iguegise 7 aeegise 7 ekse 1 Oegg og geomøig 9 11 Guag o saisikke 9 1 Omag 9 2. eikie og usikkee e esuaee 9 3 ege og keemeke 9 31 Semmee 9 3 aie og oisiee agise 1 33 iseou 1 3 Oøsig a eesise 11 35 age eeseae 11 3 Geag og yag a eeseaee 11 37 Agie semme 11 3 asee 11 39 Kommuekassiiseig 11 31 Ae mekae 1 4. oe oeesuae 1 eks å egesk 13 igue 1 aee 19 eegg 1 Maaoeige å ai/agise yke 3 2. e oisiee agisee i 8 0 3 , Soigsage 8. Skema 4 Ukome uikasoe iigee ukomme å emeomåe 4 uikasoe se u a Saisisk Seayå ee 1 aua 195 1 Saae o osk saisikk (SS 151 Saaeg i aee . a ka ikke oekomme - u Mie e 5 a e uke eee COES age Ie o igues 8 Ie o aes 8 e . Suey esig 13 .. Saisica asis 13 .2. Coeage 13 2. Eos a eiaiiy o esus 13 . ems a aiaes 13 .. oig igs 13 .2. aies a oicia eecoa iss 13 .. Eecoa ac 4 .4. isiuio o oes cas o oi iss o iee aies 4 .. Eece eeseaies 4 .6. eeecio a is eecio o eeseaies 15 .. oes cas 15 .8. egios 15 .. yes o muiciaiies 15 .0. Oe emaks 15 4. Some mai esus 15 igues 6 aes 19 Aees . isiuio o seas y ayeecoa is. Couy 8 2. e oicia eecoa iss i 8 . 0 . e Soig eecios 8. Quesioaie 4 uicaios eiousy issue o e suec 4 uicaios issue y e Cea ueau o Saisics sice auay 8 46 Saas o owegia Saisics (SS 151 Eaaio o Symos i aes . Caegoy o aicae - i 0,0 ess a 0.0 o ui emoye IGUEGISE Sie 1 Gokee semme å sosiaisiske aie i ose a gokee semme i a age og 9 seeme 195 yke 1 2. Eig a 191 i 195 i e oske Aeieais oseae a gokee semme yke 17 3 Eig a 191 i 195 i øyes oseae a gokee semme yke 1 AEEGISE Sammeagsaee 1 esoe me semmee agie semme og ageakig i ose Soigsagee 195 - 195 19 2. Gokee semme ee ai/agise eesise oøs ose Soigs- agee 199 - 195 19 3 Eig a 191 i 195 i aiees/agisees oseae a gokee semme eesise oøs yke oseoeg 20 4. eeseae og gokee semme eesea yke Soigsagee 1957 - 195 1 5 Geag og yag a eeseaee Soigsagee 191 - 195 1 6. age eeseae ee ai/agise og kø. Soigsagee 195 - 195 22 7 Eig a 191 i 195 i age eeseae ee ai/agise og kø yke 3 8. Geomsisae o age eeseae og aaeeseae ee ai/agise Soigsagee 195 - 195 24 eaee aee 9 esoe me semmee agie okasee og gokee semme ageakig i ose og ae å semmesee Kommue 26 1 esoe me semmee ageakig i ose Kommueye ie ase 44 11 Gokee semme ee ai/agise Kommue 46 1 Gokee semme ee ai/agise ose Kommue 64 13 Gokee semme ee ai/agise ose Kommueye ie ase 7 1 Gokee semme o og ee eseaso o aie i iseou yke 7 15 age eeseae ee ai/agise og kø yke 79 1 ai/agise som ok sise maa og magee semmea o ae aie/ag- ise iseou yke 80 17 age eeseae ee ae og ai/agise 1 IE O IGUES age . ai oes o sociais aies i e ce o oa ai oes. e eecio 8 a Seeme 8. Couy 6 2. Cages om 8 o 8 i aou ays eceage sae o ai oes. Couy 17 . Cages om 8 o 8 i Coseaie ays eceage sae o ai oes. Couy 8 IE O AES Summay aes . esos eie o oe, oes cas a eceage o. Soig eecios 4 8 . 19 2. eceage isiuio o ai oes y ayeecoa is. oes cas o oi iss isiue. Soig eecios 4 8 19 . Cage om 8 o 8 i e aieseecoa iss eceage sae o ai oes. oes cas o oi iss isiue. Couy. eceage ois 20 4. eeseaies a ai oes e eeseaie. Couy. Soig eecios 8 2 . eeecio a is eecio o eeseaies. Soig eecios 6 8 2 6. Eece eeseaies y ayeecoa is a se. Soig eecios 4 8 22 . Cage om 8 o 8 i eece eeseaies, y ayeecoa is a se. Couy 2 8. Aeage age o eece eeseaies a euy eeseaies, y ayeecoa is Soig eecios 6 8 24 eaie aes . esos eie o oe, oes cas, eece a ai oes, eceage o a ume o oig saios. Muiciaiy 26 0. esos eie o oe, eceage o. ye o muiciaiy y egio 44 . ai oes y ayeecoa is. Muiciaiy 46 2. ai oes y ayeecoa is. e ce. Muiciaiy 64 . ai oes y ayeecoa_ is. e ce. ye o muiciaiy y egio 4 4. ai oes eoe a ae eseaio o aies i eecoa ac. Couy 8 . Eece eeseaies y ayeecoa is a se. Couy 79 6. ayeecoa is wiig e as sea, a aiioa oes eee y oe aies eecoa iss. Eecoa ac. Couy 80 . Eece eeseaies y age a ayeecoa is 8 9 1 OEGG OG GEOMOIG 11 Guag o saisikke Saisikke o Soigsage og 9 seeme 195 ygge å oysige a agsy- ee Koeksoe som isiksagsyee oeok å agogøsskemaee som e se Soige og som e goke a Soiges umakskomié e iaeie Ogaee e også kooe mo kommeaee a umakskomiée Ogaee e iee me emme i agoes § og ee umak a Kommua- og aeiseaemee Oysigee i ae 5 om yag og geag a eeseae e iee a Soige 1 Omag Saisikke omae agesuaee o ae kommuee Ogaeskemae som e ye e is i eegg 3 A ee gå e am ike oysige som e same i a agsyee øseså å e age eeseaee e iee a Soige 2. EIKIE OG USIKKEE E ESUAEE agsyee a a o ae å me og kie som seme a e akyssee maasis- ee ee ka a o i a e e ekee ei i isse esuaee oi esoummee ikke ege e me i maae e e askeigee o agsyee å ee o aa me og kie som seme 3 EGE OG KEEMEKE 31 Semmee Kaee i semmee gå am a Guoes § 5 og agoes S 3 ome oe semme- esaee som a æ egise som osa i e osk okeegise i øe a e sise 1 å i auomaisk komme me i maae I iegg ka oske sasogee som a æ osa i ua- e sammeegee me e 1 å kee seg iø i maae isse esoee ae ikke semme- e iigee oske sasogee som ai a æ egise som osa i oe osk okeegise a osa ikke semmee 1 3 aie og oisiee agise øgee egisee oiiske aie sie eie ise e age (okoige som e uk i oe aee i aees e ieae okeaie ( e oske Aeieai (A emskisaie ( øye ( Kiseig okeai (K oges Kommuisiske ai (K o agaiase ( Seeaie (S Sosiaisisk eseai (S ese ( ie okeage esoisaie Samusaie Sumøsisa Uoiisk e Soigsage 195 a e øgee iseou øye og Seeaie i Øso e ieae okeaie og øye i eemak Kiseig okeai og Seeaie i Oa uskeu eso eemak Aus-Age og oms e ieae okeaie og Kiseig okeai i Sø-øeag e ieae okeaie Kiseig okeai og Seeaie i Akesus Oso es-Age oaa o-øeag og imak e oisiee agisee e a i i eegg 33 iseou E ai som e egise ee agoes S 17 ka e soigsag agi ekæig om iseou me e ee ee ae egisee aie Sik ekæig mg æe iee i samsa me esemmesee i S 5 1a og æe ueskee i samsa me esemmesee i øse og ae e E iseosag ka ikke ioe me e e iseou egee som øske å semme å e ai i iseou ue å søe iseoue ka ese- ee seg mo iseoue e eegig a maaoeige ekkes isse eseasoee a iseoues semmea 11 3 Oøsig a eesise aeee 3 1 15 1 og 17 ise aioeige o eesise e oøs 1 ae e semme å eesise 199 - 199 oe S e esekie aie i samsa me semmeoeige e e sise soigsage a e sie eie ise i e eøe yke e e a ekeiee e eesisesemmee e ee esuaee e e sise kommueage o soigsage o Soigsage i e semme agi å eesise oe å e esekie aie ee e meoe e e e a ugagsuk i aiees iyes sykeoo å ykesasis i 199 koige o amgag/iakegag a 199 i 1973 i yke e sie eie ise i 1973 o So- igsagee i 1977 og 191 e uk samme meoe som i 1973 me me ugagsuk i esuaee a ykesigsagee o å o e esekie soigsagee 35 age eeseae Saisikke oe eeseae i Soige omae age eeseae eeseae- e som ose 195 møe as o meemme a egeige e såees a me a aaeesea- ee 3 Geag og yag a eeseaee age eeseae i 195 som iigee a æ ase eeseae ee oykk e øsa e e gue ue "mø som aaeesea" i ae 5 e samme gee iigee aaeeseae som a mi as o meemme a egeige 37 Agie semme aee o okasee (og eme ogsS agie semme e ikke goke semmegiig o ueo Iøge agoes S 7 ska e ee ikke kysses a i maae o ikke goke semme- giig 3 asee aes yke e gue i asee å øgee måe 1 øsae Øso Akesus Oso emak Oa uskeu eso og eemak 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ihlen (2004) Rhetoric and Resources
    For my parents Abstract The aim of this dissertation is to discuss the influence that organizations have on public policies through their rhetoric and use of resources. The empirical focus is on public relations strategies regarding the public policy area on energy and the environment. Two case studies are conducted, centering on what have been the two most controversial environmental conflicts in Norway; the first concerns a hydroelectric development and the second relates to the building of gas-fired power plants. The environmentalists lost the first conflict, whereas the latter plants have still not been built. The theoretical starting point for the dissertation is within the realm of rhetorical studies of public relations, but it is argued that these studies have seldom contained specific suggestions for how to go about broad-based analyses. Furthermore, it is claimed that the studies have remained ontologically underdeveloped, which means that they do not offer analytical frameworks that make it possible to account adequately for organizational actors’ influence on, for instance, matters of public policy. The dissertation thus contains a suggestion for a heuristic analytical device drawing on a wide range of rhetorical concepts, combined with a sociological analysis of resources like economic capital, degree of institutionalization, knowledge, networks, and social standing. Historical reconstructions are made of the two cases. The research material is a sample of public relations material from the organizational actors, including brochures and advertisements, but also other texts, such as applications for building permits, and comments made to newspapers. Furthermore, qualitative interviews were conducted with representatives of the organizations involved.
    [Show full text]
  • FORMAL COMPLAINT VS the KINGDOM of NORWAY 1 by Wilh
    United Nations petition — incomplete report Date: April ……. , 2009 Plaintiff: Surname: Winther First names: Wilhelm Werner Gender: Male Birthplace/-date: NO-Ålesund — May 17, 1963 Nationality: Norwegian Present address: Åsen 4, NO-6270 Brattvåg, Norway Contact information: Norwegian authorities should send their communications/representatives etc to my counsellor in NO-Ålesund, Mr Johs. A ASPEHAUG (P.O Box 837, 6001 Ålesund [PRV: Kipervikg. 5 — ―Grimmergården‖ — Ålesund]). Due to persistent, dangerous and totally illegal harassment and interference from Norwegian authorities, representatives from foreign governments, human rights organizations and tribunals etc should apply couriers satisfyingly identifying themselves as authentic messengers — no letters should be forwarded through, e.g, the official postal services of Norway (i.e ―Posten Norge BA‖) or DHL, and no confidential information should be transferred by telecommunication or direct consultation with aforesaid counsellor (Mr Aspehaug is trustworthy enough, but his office etc ‘ve been unlawfully surveilled by Norwegian author- ities for years). Norwegian authorities are much likely to v.g; obstruct phone calls, steal telefac- similes/letters, erase e-mails and to bug/surveil/eavesdrop clothes, luggage, PCs, calculators, cellular phones, hotel rooms, restaurants, shops, public health facili- ties, libraries, closed sessions, cars/taxicabs, parks and — pet animals etc. 1 FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 1 by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway United Nations petition — incomplete
    [Show full text]
  • Stortingsvalget 1989 Percentage of Votes Per Labour Party, Socialist Left Party and Environment and Solidarity
    OGES OISIEE SAISIKK 91 SOIGSAGE 199 SOIG EECIO 199 SAISISK SEAYÅ OSO-KOGSIGE 199 IS -537-99- ISS -97 EMEGUE oiiske eme AE EMEO Soigsag Semmea eeseae 3 OO 1 ee uikasoe egge Saisisk seayå am eaee esuae oe agea- kig og oeige a semme ee ai/agise e Soigsage 1 og 11 seeme 199 uikasoe ieoe a ae e oisiee agisee oesik oe maaoeig og age eeseae og aaeeseae o se gag e e me e ae å agkes- iå oe oesiksaee gi a også a iigee soigsag Ekee oesike esee- es i om a emaiske ka Saisisk seayå i seiee gi u e ao me esuae a e ieuueskese som Saisisk seayå oeok i samaei me Isiu o samusoskig sekosue Kåe assee a så o uaeiige a uikasoe Saisisk seayå Oso/Kogsige 7 ai 199 Ae Oe a yugie 4 EACE e ae o eecoa aiciaio (eecoa uou a isiuio o oes y ay/is a e Geea Eecio o e owegia Soig o 1 a 11 Seeme 199 ae esee i is uicaio A eo o e esus o a ieiew suey caie ou y e Cea ueau o Saisics i cooeaio wi e Isiue o Socia eseac wi e uise ae is uicaio as ee eae y Kae assee Cea ueau o Saisics Oso/Kogsige 7 Ai 199 Ae Oe a yugie 5 IO Sie iguegise 7 aeegise 7 ekse 1 Oegg og geomig 9 11 Guag o saisikke 9 1 Omag 9 2. eikie og usikkee e esuaee 9 1 aiees semmea 9 Agie og okasee semme 9 3 ege og keemeke 1 31 Semmee 0 3 aie og oisiee agise 1 33 Osig a eesise 1 3 age eeseae 11 35 Geag og yag a eeseaee 11 3 Agie okasee og gokee semme 11 37 asee 11 3 Kommuekassiiseig sea ie 11 39 Semmea o A ie/ae maae 2 31 yes- /a gkesoysige 2 311 Ae mekae 2 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Impact Case: Soplace
    Evaluation of Social Science Research in Norway Name of impact case: SoPlace Summary of the impact Urban planning and place-making have the last two decades increasingly focused on aesthetics, architecture and place marketing. Research done by members of this group has been important for generating knowledge about the social implications of such strategies, and has had a substantial policy impact by developing a methodology to analyse the social and cultural conditions for places and place-making. This methodology has become widespread in urban planning and place-making, and has supplemented traditional methods focusing on landscape, built environment and architecture. Per Gunnar Røe has been a key researcher developing this methodology, and disseminating research results and methods. Description of the research underpinning the impact The key researcher in the development of this methodology is Røe, together with colleagues at the NIBR. At the start in 2000 we were a small group (2-3 researchers) developing the theoretical and methodological approaches. More researchers were involved as this became a growing field, and the number of contract research projects increased. The research on social conditions for place-making, underpinning the development of a methodology for analysing places and place-making as social constructs, has taken place over a period of 15 years. It consists of research projects based on: i) Case-studies of place-making and urban development projects, ii) mapping the practices and views of certain groups, and iii) theoretical and methodological innovations. In 2007 a guideline for “Socio-cultural place analysis” (Brattbakk et al. 2007) was made and distributed widely (every municipality in Norway got a copy, and an electronic version was made accessible to all).
    [Show full text]
  • Conflictingxintersts.AH..Pdf (684.4Kb)
    Conflicting Interests? The Norwegian Dilemma in the Agricultural Negotiations in GATT’s Uruguay Round 1986-1994 Astrid Scharning Huitfeldt Dissertation in History Institute of Archaeology, Conservation and Historical studies, IAKH UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Spring 2006 ii Foreword The process of writing this thesis has been long and at time a lonely process. My interests for trade in relation to developing countries have grown during my undergraduate studies. After a conversation with Frode Liland at SUM, the Uruguay Round appeared as an interesting field, where not much earlier research had been done in Norway. After consulting the archive at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs it was clear that I had to limit the theme of my thesis, and the agricultural negotiations became the subject of research. First of all I want to thank my supervisor Helge Ø. Pharo. He has encouraged and inspired me, given me good advises and accepted my delays in the process of writing. I am also grateful for the assistance given by Inga Badi Massoud from the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, assisting me at the archive and providing me with a lot of documents and files. Thanks also to Ingrid Næser and Kjersti Andersen who have read my thesis, correcting my English and contributed with useful comments. Lastly, I want to thank Daniel for helping and keeping up with me, especially in the last period of my writings. He has paid at least some attention to my talks about the Uruguay Round. Grünerløkka, April 2006 Astrid S. Huitfeldt iii iv Contents V ABBREVIATIONS IN THE TEXT..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]