Economic Development Program: 1997-98 Report to the Governor and the Legislature

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Economic Development Program: 1997-98 Report to the Governor and the Legislature DOCUMENT RESUME ED 434 708 JC 990 643 TITLE Economic Development Program: 1997-98 Report to the Governor and the Legislature. INSTITUTION California Community Colleges, Sacramento. Office of the Chancellor. PUB DATE 1998-02-26 NOTE 220p. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annual Reports; Budgets; *Community Colleges; *Economic Development; *Economic Impact; *Educational Finance; Government School Relationship; *Program Development; *Program Evaluation; Statewide Planning; Two Year Colleges IDENTIFIERS *California Community Colleges ABSTRACT Each year, the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges produces a report for the governor and legislature on the Economic Development Program. Created in 1987, this program's mission is to utilize community colleges to advance the state's economic growth and competitiveness through education focused on work force improvement and job development. Major sections of this report include:(1) an introduction; (2) Economic Development Program overview;(3) economic development initiatives, programs and projects;(4) annual report of Economic Development Program; (5) activities that enhance the programmatic mission;(6) progress in eliminating business access barriers;(7) services provided to colleges and employers (contains 2 large tables);(8) statistical data of program participants (contains 2 large tables);(9) status report on contract education activities (contains figures showing activities by region);(10) recommended level of services; and (11) budget expenditures (contains budget summary table for each program). During 1997-98, 23 initiatives, programs and projects were funded, including Job Development Incentive Training Fund, Small Business Development Centers, Workplace Learning Resource Centers, and Employer-Based Training. Each of these was implemented at several community colleges, for a total of 181 local projects. The total budget of the Economic Development Program was $29 million, an increase of approximately $20 million from 1996-97. Appendices include products produced by each program; strategic partners, public and private, for each program; and budget summaries from 1982-83 to 1997-98. (RDG) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ******************************************************************************** Economic Development Program 1997-98 Report to the Governor and the Legislature PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS Office of Educational Research and Improvement BEEN GRANTED BY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. 0 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. 1998 0 0- Chancellor's Office California Community Colleges EST COPY AVELAIBLIE 2 Economic Development Program 1997-98 Report to the Governor and the Legislature 1998 Chancellors Office California Community Colleges 3 CHANCELLOR'S OFFICE CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES 1107 NINTH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814.3607 Imp://www.cccco.edu (916) 445-8752 February 26, 1998 The Honorable Gray Davis Governor, State of California The Honorable John Burton Senate President Pro Tempore The Honorable Antonio R. Villaraigosa Speaker, California State Assembly The State Legislature codified in AB 3512 (Chapter 805, Statutes of 1994, Section 15379.23) that commencing in 1996, the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges shall submit an annual report of the Economic Development Program, or "ED>Net", to the Governor and the Legislature. The 1997-98 annual report accompanies this letter. As you may know, the Economic Development Program received a $20 million augmentation in fiscal year 1997-98. The development of an expenditure plan acceptable to the Board, the grant competitive process and the awarding of the funds, though time consuming, were accomplished with efficiency. However, projects were conducted in a greatly reduced timeframe of approximately five to six months, and thus had less time to expend all of the funds. The $5 million Job Development Incentive Training Program, authorized in legislation and available for awards on a continuous basis, was a new concept to the colleges resulting in a slow start for use of the funds and the award of $1 million in project funds late in the fiscal year. In June the Department of Finance granted a request to redirect $3 million of these program funds to the Industry Driven Regional Collaborative program category. These 25 projects, granted late in the 1997-98 fiscal year, are accomplishing planned objectives and activities this year and will be included in the 1998-99 annual report. The information contained in the enclosed report is based on a comprehensive review of documents and reports on 181 local projects funded in fiscal year 1997-98. This includes the compilation of project performance on data files on participants, activities, services and expenditures. As you may know, the Community Colleges Economic Development Program consists of Economic Development Centers, Programs and Statewide Leadership and Technical Assistance Services. Through these centers and programs, the colleges were able to respond to inquiries and provide in-depth training BEST COPY AVAILABLE 4 and development services to businesses, students and participants. The Executive Summary of the report provides information on the highlights of the program. On behalf of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, I respectfully submit the Economic Development Program 1997-98 Report to the Governor and the Legislature for your information and review. Please notice the acknowledgment on the first page of the executive summary of the exceptional leadership and crucial funding support that was provided in this effort. Sincerely, 4rnocnow-ifia4-*-- Tom Nussbaum Chancellor Enclosure cc: Board of Governors Legislative Analyst Senator Richard Polanco 5 '44 Economic Development Program 1997-98 Report to the Governor and the Legislature Table Of Contents SECTION I: OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES, PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS 2 ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGIES 3 BUSINESS AND WORKFORCE PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT/CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE 3 BUSINESS AND WORKFORCE PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT/PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE 4 CENTERS FOR APPLIED BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES 4 CENTERS FOR APPLIED COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES 4 CENTERS FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE DEVELOPMENT 5 CONTRACT EDUCATION TECHNICAL SUPPORT 6 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TRAINING SET-ASIDE 6 EMPLOYER-BASED TRAINING 6 INDUSTRY DRIVEN REGIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING COLLABORATIVES 7 JOB DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE TRAINING FUND 7 LOCALLY-BASED STATEWIDE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION NETWORK 8 MODEL PROGRAMS FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 8 NEW MEDIA/MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT CENTERS 9 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT, ORGANIZATIONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT 9 REGIONAL CONSORTIA 10 REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL BUSINESS RESOURCE ASSISTANCE CENTERS 10 REGIONAL HEALTH OCCUPATIONS RESOURCE CENTERS 1 I SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTERS 11 STRATEGIC PRIORITY LEADERSHIP, COORDINATION AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 12 TECHNICAL INSTRUCTOR INTENSIVE IN-SERVICE TRAINING 12 VOCATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY INSTRUCTOR AND CAREER COUNSELOR IN-SERVICE 13 WORKPLACE LEARNING RESOURCE CENTERS 13 ANNUAL REPORT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 14 ACTIVITIES THAT ENHANCE THE PROGRAMMATIC MISSION 15 ADVANCING THE PROGRAMMATIC MISSION 19 ATTRACTION, RETENTION AND EXPANSION OE BUSINESS . 38 INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS . 45 IDENTIFICATION, ACQUISITION AND LEVERAGING OF RESOURCES 51 1997-98 Economic Development Program Annual Report LOGISTICAL, TECHNICAL AND MARKETING INFRASTRUCTURE 59 OPTIMIZING ACCESS 85 STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS. 103 COMNILINITY ASSISTANCE 117 PROGRESS IN ELIMINATING BUSINESS ACCESS BARRIERS 119 IDENTIFIED BARRIERS 119 BREAKING DOWN THE BARRIERS 120 SERVICES PROVIDED TO COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS 121 STATISTICAL DATA OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS 129 STATUS REPORT ON CONTRACT EDUCATION ACTIVITIES 135 CONTRACT EDUCATION THREE-YEAR COMPARISON 136 RECOMMENDED LEVEL OF SERVICES 141 ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGIES 141 CENTERS FOR APPLIED BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES 142 CENTERS FOR APPLIED COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES 142 CENTERS FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE DEVELOPMENT 143 CONTRACT EDUCATION TECHNICAL SUPPORT 143 NEW MEDIA/MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT CENTERS 144 REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL BUSINESS RESOURCE ASSISTANCE CENTERS 144 REGIONAL HEALTH OCCUPATIONS RESOURCE CENTERS 145 SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTERS 145 WORKPLACE LEARNING RESOURCE CENTERS 147 BUDGET EXPENDITURES 148 ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGIES 150 BUSINESS AND WORKFORCE PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT/CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE 150 BUSINESS AND WORKFORCE PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT/PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE 150 CENTERS FOR APPLIED BIOLOGICAL. TECHNOLOGIES 151 CENTERS FOR APPLIED COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES 151 CENTERS FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE DEVELOPMENT 152 CONTRACT EDUCATION TECHNICAL SUPPORT 152 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TRAINING SET -ASIDE 152 EMPLOYER-BASED TRAINING 153 INDUSTRY DRIVEN REGIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING COLLABORATIVES 153 ,1013 DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE TRAINING FUND 153
Recommended publications
  • List of Affiliates
    LIST OF AFFILIATES 33C Global Services, Inc, Furnishes telecommunications and systems integration products to customers and operates divisions which sell and service voice systems for business use. SBC International. Inc. Holding company for SBC subsidiaries and affiliates operating internationallywhose interests are in foreign telecommunications and other related businesses. SBC Internet Services, Inc. Internet service provider. SBC Laboratories, Inc. (FDC exception applies) Involved in applications research; the preparation of general generic specifications for products; the testing and evaluation of manutacturers' designs and products to determine if the general specification? set by the various SBC subsidiaries are being met; and writing applications software for computers with processing systems that have been designed to be user-programmed. SBC Long Distance, LLC (Section 272 Affiliate) Provides interexchange services. SBC Management Services, L.P. (FDC exception applies) Provides various administrative and support services for the parent holding company and other subsidiaries. SBC Management Services. USA, (FDC exception applies) Provides various administrative and support Inc. services for the parent holding company and other subsidiaries. SBC Operations, Inc. (FDC exception applies) Includes the development and design of business processes to provide for the planning, development and other support for the sale and merchandising of telecommunications services and products as well as a single point of contact for customers. SBC Services, Inc. (FDC exception applies) Performs centralized administrative support services including Information Technology and Billing Support Services, Real Estate Support Services, Procurement Support Services, Human Resources Support Services, Training Services and Finance Support Services. SBC Telecom, Inc. Competitive local exchange carrier. SNET America, Inc. lnterexchange service provider through carrier alliances.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunications Service Providers IAC Codes, Exchange Carrier Names, Company Codes - Telcordia and Regions
    COMMON LANGUAGE® Telecommunications Service Providers IAC Codes, Exchange Carrier Names, Company Codes - Telcordia and Regions Telcordia Technologies Practice BR-751-100-112 Issue 2 April 1999 Proprietary — Licensed Material Possession or use of this material or any of the COMMON LANGUAGE Codes, Rules, and Information disclosed herein requires a written license agreement and is governed by its terms and conditions. For more information, visit www.commonlanguage.com/notices. An SAIC Company BR-751-100-112 TSP IAC Codes, EC names, Company Codes - Telcordia and Regions Issue 2 Copyright Page April 1999 COMMON LANGUAGE® Telecommunications Service Providers IAC Codes, Exchange Carrier Names, Company Codes - Telcordia and Regions Prepared for Telcordia Technologies by: Lois Modrell Target audience: Telecommunications Service Providers This document replaces: BR-751-100-112, Issue 1, March 1998 Technical contact: Lois Modrell To obtain copies of this document, contact your company’s document coordinator or call 1-800-521-2673 (from the USA and Canada) or 1-732-699-5800 (all others), or visit our Web site at www.telcordia.com. Telcordia employees should call (732) 699-5802. Copyright © 1997-1999 Telcordia Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. Project Funding Year: 1999 Trademark Acknowledgments Telcordia is a trademark of Telcordia Technologies, Inc. COMMON LANGUAGE is a registered trademark of Telcordia Technologies. Proprietary — Licensed Material See confidentiality restrictions on title page. 2 BR-751-100-112 Issue 2 TSP IAC Codes, EC Names, Company Codes - Telcordia and Regions April 1999 Disclaimer Notice of Disclaimer This document is issued by Telcordia Technologies, Inc. to inform Telcordia customers of the Telcordia practice relating to COMMON LANGUAGE® Telecommunications Service Providers IAC Codes, Exchange Carrier Names - Company Codes - Telcordia and Regions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unauthorized Biography of the Baby Bells & Info-Scandal
    The Unauthorized Bio Of The Baby Bells 1 The Unauthorized Biography of the Baby Bells & Info-Scandal by Bruce Kushnick, Executive Director, New Networks Institute With Foreword by: Dr. Bob Metcalfe This book has been prepared by New Networks Institute.. All rights reserved. Reproduction or further distribution of this report without written authorization is prohibited by law. For additional copies or information please contact New networks Institute at 826 Broadway, suite 900, New York, NY 10003, or by phone at 212-777-5418, or by e-mail at [email protected] © 1998 Bruce Kushnick The Unauthorized Bio Of The Baby Bells 2 To all my telecom friends, my Aunt Ethel, Vice President Al Gore, and anyone else who uses a phone. The Unauthorized Bio Of The Baby Bells 3 The Unauthorized Biography of the Baby Bells & Info-Scandal Table of Contents Foreword Preface Who Are the Baby Bells? Book I Info-Scandal: Highway To Nowhere Chapter 1 Promises, Promises: The Future is Always. 21 Chapter 2 What Was the Information Superhighway, Anyway? 32 Chapter 3 Consumers Never Cared & Technology Cost Too Much 47 Chapter 4 Case Study — Opportunity New Jersey: An I-Way Failure 62 Chapter 5 ISDN (The Info Bahn, Take 1) "It Still Does Nothing" 73 Book II History & Strategies: Shareholders First, Customers Last Chapter 6 Brief History of Ma Bell and the Creation of the Baby Bells 92 Chapter 7 Opinions About the Baby Bells' Future 103 Chapter 8 Regional Bell Business Strategies Since 1984 107 Chapter 9 Remove ALL Regulation, Plead Poverty, Constantly Lobby 110
    [Show full text]
  • AT&T Adoption Reimbursement Program
    Program Important Benefits Information AT&T Adoption Reimbursement Program This booklet is your Program document for the AT&T Adoption Reimbursement Program. This Program document replaces the December 2002 SBC Adoption Reimbursement Program SPD and the SBC Adoption Reimbursement Program plan text in their entirety. DISTRIBUTION Distributed to management and bargained employees of all pre-merger SBC companies. NIN: 78-2420 Adoption Benefit Program | July 2006 IMPORTANT INFORMATION This Program document was written for easy readability. Therefore, it may contain generalizations and informal terms rather than precise legal terms. Also, this document is the official document of the Program. It will govern and be the final authority on the terms of the Program. AT&T reserves the right to terminate or amend any and all of its employee benefit plans or programs, subject to any collective bargaining obligation. Participation in this Program is neither a contract nor a guarantee of future employment. Please keep this Program document for future reference. This Program document is provided for your information and review; no other action is necessary. Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 4 ELIGIBILITY .............................................................................................................................. 4 CONTRIBUTIONS .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Directory Distributing Associates, Inc., No
    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) Chapter 11 ) DIRECTORY DISTRIBUTING ) Case No. 16-47428 ASSOCIATES, INC., ) ) Debtor. ) NOTICE TO CARRIERS OF RIGHTS AND DEADLINES WITH RESPECT TO DIRECTORY DISTRIBUTING ASSOCIATES, INC.’S BANKRUPTCY CASE You are receiving this Notice because records show that you delivered telephone books published by the Publishers1 for Directory Distributing Associates, Inc. (“DDA”) between June 25, 2009 and December 31, 2015. DDA and the Publishers were sued in two separate lawsuits, one in Texas and one in California (“FLSA Litigation”), alleging they violated the law by not paying minimum wage and/or overtime to certain carriers. Those allegations were denied. DDA stopped operating and then filed for bankruptcy in the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (the “Bankruptcy Court”) in 2016. DDA’s bankruptcy filing stopped the FLSA Litigation. DDA’s bankruptcy trustee (the “Trustee”), the lawyers representing some of the carriers in the Texas and California cases, and others reached a preliminary agreement on behalf of their clients to resolve the issues raised in the Texas and California cases and to provide payments to carriers. They put that agreement into a plan of liquidation (the “Plan”) that provides for payments to carriers who file claims with the Bankruptcy Court. The Plan must be approved by the Bankruptcy Court before you can receive any payments. Before that happens, carriers have to vote on whether to accept or reject the Plan. This Notice explains how you can vote on the Plan and what will happen at the hearing where the Bankruptcy Court will decide whether to approve the Plan or not.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Receipts and Disbursements
    09/17/2008 12 : 40 Image# 28932995133 REPORT OF RECEIPTS FEC AND DISBURSEMENTS FORM 3X For Other Than An Authorized Committee Office Use Only 1. NAME OF USE FEC MAILING LABEL Example:If typing, type COMMITTEE (in full) OR TYPE OR PRINT . over the lines AT&T Inc. Federal Political Action Committee (AT&T Federal PAC) 175 E. Houston Street ADDRESS. (number and street) Room 7-A-50 Check if different than previously San Antonio TX 78205 reported. (ACC) 2. FEC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER . CITY. STATE. ZIPCODE . C00109017 3. IS THISX NEW AMENDED REPORT (N)OR (A) 4. TYPE OF REPORT (b) Monthly Nov 20 (M11) Feb 20 (M2) May 20 (M5) Aug 20 (M8) (Non-Election (Choose One) Report Year Only) Due On: X Dec 20 (M12) Mar 20 (M3) Jun 20 (M6) Sep 20 (M9) (Non-Election (a) Quarterly Reports: Year Only) Apr 20 (M4) Jul 20 (M7) Oct 20 (M10) Jan 31 (YE) April 15 Quarterly Report(Q1) (c) 12-Day Primary (12P) General (12G) Runoff (12R) July 15 Quarterly Report(Q2) PRE -Election Report for the: Convention (12C) Special (12G) October 15 Quarterly Report(Q3) January 31 in the Quarterly Report(YE) Election on State of July 31 Mid-Year Report(Non-election (d) 30-Day Year Only) (MY) Post -Election General (30G) Runoff (30R) Special (30S) Report for the: Termination Report (TER) in the Election on State of 5. Covering Period 0 8 0 1 2 0 0 8through 0 8 3 1 2 0 0 8 I certify that I have examined this Report and to the best of my knowledge and belief it is true, correct and complete.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 21 22 23 24 T-02428A-06-0203 T-030 16A-06-0203 T
    T-02428A-06-0203 T-030 16A-06-0203 I T-03116A-06-0203 T-03287A-06-0203 i T-0334614-06-0203 accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-803, AT&T Inc. (“AT&T”) submits this Notice of public utility holding company in relation to the proposed uth”) as described in the Agreement and uth on March 4,2006 attached as Exhibit B T seeks a limited waiver of A.A.C. R14-2- the circumstances of this Merger. review and approval of the Merger I 20 Arizona subsidiary BellSouth Long Distance, 21 ned public service corporation in 22 23 1 Please see the investor disclosure statement attached as Exhibit A to this 24 Application. Arizona under A.A.C. R14-2-801.2 Because the Merger does not involve the acquisition of a Class A investor owned Arizona utility, the Affiliated Interests Rules do not apply to this rovides that "any utility or affiliate merger or consolidat employees or facilities in Arizona. Because BSLD has minimal erations in Arizona, the Merger will not have any adverse effect on utility service in Ari a. Further, although AT&T e three operating subsidiaries in es, their operations are ted by the Merger, their owners I s in AT&T's co er. All co mission approved in Decision No. 68269 2 BSLD is not a Class A utility and BellSouth, therefore, is not an affiliate of a Class A utility under the Affiliated Interests Rules. As such, the Affiliated Interests Rules do not apply to the Merger or to BellSouth and/or BSLD.
    [Show full text]
  • BOOK IV the Regulators and the Laws
    The Unauthorized Bio Of The Baby Bells 193 BOOK IV The Regulators and the Laws Subtitled: A Swiss Cheese Landscape on Stale Bread Rhetoric The Unauthorized Bio Of The Baby Bells 194 Chapter 19 The World of Telecom Regulation — Nationwide Swiss Cheese "Isn't phone service regulated?" My Aunt Ethel asked. "I thought they were protecting me!" She exclaimed, while shaking her cane. The use of federal and state regulation for controlling Bell profits and prices must have had many redeeming values for local telephone subscribers. Why else have the Bells constantly tried to have it removed? As we have seen, from the beginning, the Bells have advocated the removal of all regulation. From US West's 1984 Annual Report stating "we advocate continued deregulation of our industry at state as well as federal levels, (306) to Ameritech's 1985 Annual Report exclaiming that their goal was no regulation —"Our goal remains unchanged: To have the marketplace, not regulation, determine what we offer, the prices we charge.", (307) the Bells have all proclaimed that any regulation is evil, unless of course it works in their favor. More importantly, one should ask Why regulate at all? — Regulation defined as a set of state and federal laws that govern the actions of a company, service or industry. Judge Harrison, in his decision for a rate moratorium on New York Telephone in 1985, stated simply that regulation is applied when there is no competition. There is no tug of a competitor's lower prices to keep monopoly, the sole provider of local telephone prices, in check.(308) "Regulation will fill the void of competition.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARLES V. CALDER, Et Al. : : on Behalf of Themselves and on : Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, : : 1:06-Cv-01083 Plaintiffs, : : Judge Gottschall : V
    Case 1:06-cv-01083 Document 29 Filed 05/11/2006 Page 1 of 61 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS : CHARLES V. CALDER, et al. : : On behalf of themselves and on : behalf of all others similarly situated, : : 1:06-cv-01083 Plaintiffs, : : Judge Gottschall : v. : : AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN and : : AT&T INC., : : Defendants. : : FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel, allege as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a class action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. 2. Plaintiffs are former management employees of AT&T Inc. (“AT&T” or the “Company,” formerly known as SBC Communications Inc.), and participants in the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan (the “AT&T Plan” or “Plan,” formerly known) (a/k/a AT&T Pension Benefit Plan), which AT&T both sponsors and administers. 3. The Plan is the Company’s main defined benefit plan and one of the largest private pension plans in the country, with approximately $30 billion in assets and covering Case 1:06-cv-01083 Document 29 Filed 05/11/2006 Page 2 of 61 some 350,000 current and former AT&T employees around the country. See Plan 2004 IRS Form 5500. The Plan has a significant concentration of participants who reside and earn or earned pension benefits in the Northern District of Illinois. 4. These Plan participants are current or former employees of the AT&T “controlled group” of corporations, namely, subsidiaries or affiliates that are owned at least eighty percent (80%), directly or indirectly, by AT&T.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 3 Statutory Rights Under California
    2013 – 2014 THE CALIFORNIA EMPLOYER CHAPTER 3 Statutory Rights Under California Law CHAPTER 3 STATUTORY RIGHTS UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW § 3.1 I. CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION LAW UPDATE § 3.1.1 A. INTRODUCTION Legislative changes continued for California private-sector employers through 2012, with new provisions affecting earnings statements, personnel records, and commission agreements. Significant court decisions were rendered regarding meal and rest periods, maintaining and pursuing class actions, and overtime exemptions. § 3.1.2 B. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS § 3.1.2(a) Statutory Developments The following statutes took effect on January 1, 2013, unless otherwise noted. § 3.1.2(a)(i) Wage Statement Requirements An employee is now presumed to have suffered injury if the employer provided a wage statement that did not fully comply with all of the requirements of Labor Code section 226(a). Section 226(a) requires employers to furnish each employee with an accurate, itemized statement showing such information as the gross wages earned, all deductions, net wages earned, hours worked at each hourly rate and the hourly rate, and the inclusive dates of the pay period. Section 226(a) imposes penalties and other remedies where employees are injured as a result of an employer’s willful intentional failure to provide the required information. Prior to this amendment, the injury requirement was not met solely because a wage statement failed to include some of the itemized requirements.1 In order to suffer injury, a plaintiff had 1 See, e.g., Elliot v. Spherion Pacific Work, L.L.C., 572 F. Supp. 2d 1169, 1181 (C.D. Cal. 2008); Price v.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Plan Description (SPD) for the Bargained Cash Balance Program #2 (Program) of the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan (Plan)
    Summary Plan Description Important Benefits Information Bargained Cash Balanced Program #2 of the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan This is the summary plan description (SPD) for the Bargained Cash Balance Program #2 (Program) of the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan (Plan). Please keep this SPD for future reference. DISTRIBUTION Distributed to active and former employees of participating companies as described in the “Participating Companies” section on Page 9 who are eligible to participate in the Program as described in the “Eligibility and Participation” section on Page 8. Distributed to alternate payees, retirees and survivors of all groups above. NIN 78-20110 Pension Summary Plan Description | April 2010 IMPORTANT INFORMATION In all cases, the official Plan documents govern and are the final authority on the terms of the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan (Plan), and if there are any discrepancies between the information in this Summary Plan Description (SPD) and the Plan, the Plan documents will control. AT&T Inc. reserves the right to terminate or amend any and all of its employee benefit plans or programs. Participation in the Plan is neither a contract nor a guarantee of future employment. What Is This Document? This SPD is a guide to your benefits under the Bargained Cash Balance Program #2 (Program), a program of the Plan. This SPD together with the summaries of material modifications (SMMs) issued for this Program constitute your SPD for this Program. See the “Eligibility and Participation” section on Page 8 for more information about eligibility for the Bargained Cash Balance Program #2 and other programs under the Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Case 2:12-cv-02033-KJM-AC Document 49 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RIDDICK, ET AL., No. 2:12-cv-02033-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 AT&T INC., ET AL., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff 18 Valerie Lynn (“Plaintiff Lynn”) filed a motion for permission for electronic case filing on August 19 8, 2014. ECF No. 46. On August 14, 2014, Plaintiffs June Riddick, Patricia Hardy, Natalie 20 Maderos, Valerie Lynn, and Lisa Vales (“Plaintiffs”) filed a motion for leave to amend in order to 21 add defendants AT&T Advertising Solutions, AT&T Advertising & Publishing, AT&T Yellow 22 Pages, AT&T Real Yellow Pages, AT&T California, Pacific Bell Directory, SBC Directory, SBC 23 Directory Operations, SBC Yellow Pages, YP Western Directory LLC, YP Holdings LLC, and 24 Cerberus Capital Management. ECF No. 48. For the reasons stated below the Court grants 25 Plaintiff Lynn’s motion for permission for electronic case filing in part and grants Plaintiffs’ 26 motion for leave to amend. 27 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 28 Plaintiffs filed their original complaint on August 2, 2012, claiming that defendant AT&T 1 Case 2:12-cv-02033-KJM-AC Document 49 Filed 09/03/14 Page 2 of 3 1 had violated the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Government Code § 12900 et 2 seq.; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]