DOCSLIB.ORG

Policy Brief PB-16/16 NATO's Mediterranean Dialogue: What Are New Possible Approaches? by Rachid El Houdaigui

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Policy Brief PB-16/16 NATO's Mediterranean Dialogue: What Are New Possible Approaches? by Rachid El Houdaigui June 2016 Policy Brief PB-16/16 NATO's Mediterranean Dialogue: What are new possible approaches? By Rachid El Houdaigui Summary NATO's Mediterranean Dialogue (MD) is a forum for cooperation launched in 1994 for non-NATO members from Mediterranean countries. It currently involves Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Morocco, Mauritania and Tunisia. The 2004 Istanbul Heads of State NATO Summit gave new impetus to the dialogue by enhancing the level of partner- ship. Since then, many observers note its difficulty to position itself among other political initiatives that are multiply- ing in the Mediterranean. For our part, we argue that despite the imperfections of the MD, it is still an evolving process; like any institutional process, this dialogue is a process following phases and steps with achievements, inconsistencies and limitations that require a common reflection and debate on effective responses to correct defects and improve cooperation. The current context seems favorable for relaunching the • Utility of redefining risks and threats; debate on the MD, with the upcoming NATO summit to • The need to objectify interoperability; be held from July 8 to 9, 2016 in Warsaw, Poland. The • The need for a pooling of efforts for crisis management. objective is to emphasize that the Alliance now cannot refrain from revising its Mediterranean vision for 1. Priority given to reconceptualizing the security, since the Mediterranean is a security emergency and an essential strategic perspective for Europe, the partnership United States and partner countries. The design of the NATO partnership in general and This article is written within this perspective, and NATO's Mediterranean Dialogue (MD) in particular attempts to contextualize the MD according to its variable should be based on a thought pattern that is more geometry. Indeed, the cooperation equation within the geopolitical than functional. It is time to break with MD framework takes into account four dynamics that the essentialist functionalist spirit; this view in each combine and reinforce each other, thereby producing a country or across the Mediterranean’s southern shore: situation that necessitates the relaunch of the partnership A client, device, structure (omitting that this structure framework on new foundations: has a history), geography, constructed policy and social norms. It is true that the MD introduced new principles 1 2 • Priority given to reconceptualizing the partnership; throughout its process: inclusivity and diversity instead 1. "All MD countries should view themselves as stakeholders in the same cooperative work." 2. "The Mediterranean Dialogue respects and takes into account the regional, cultural, and political context of each partner country." 1 OCP Policy Center Policy Brief of imposition3 tailored to each stakeholder. However, in the NATO-Russia tensions and limitations of the the trend is a transposition of cooperation models and MD. Hence, the question of course is whether the programs in a context of a strategic and technological gap. Alliance would refocus on the Euro-Atlantic to make The supply of expertise seems to fit more in a dynamic of it into a global geostrategic pole in front of China and expanding military-technical diagrams oriented toward Russia while maintaining a minimum of partnership an Atlanticist agenda. with its immediate neighborhood, especially in the Mediterranean. Conversely, does NATO really intend to Yet, it can be noted that NATO and its Mediterranean project itself as a global actor? And even if it wanted to, it partners have neither the same perceptions nor the same should first have the capacity and the necessary strategic instruments, and do not necessarily share priorities. The endurance. Either path will shape the configuration of issue of defense modernization, for example, must be relations between NATO and partner countries. understood in the light of the political sphericity of each partner, most of which have not yet started the transition The partnership also will gain in relevance if North Africa, from a volunteer army to a professional army.4 the Maghreb in this case, acquires a minimum of shared views and vision on the form and substance of relations This process eventually installed a kind of division of with NATO; by together addressing the NATO leaders, labor: NATO provides tailored expertise and contributes the partners can present their arguments concerning to the convergence of standards and procedures. the development of the partnership. Meanwhile, for Mediterranean partners are in turn invited to participate geopolitical reasons these countries prefer the bilateral in part in maintaining peace operations. We are therefore format to the multilateral format. facing a kind of outsourcing that involves a transfer of NATO solutions and, in turn, an alignment on NATO 2. Utility of redefining risks and threats security and strategic objectives. The biggest effort of adaptation is to redefine the MD « The objective is to emphasize that the based on a redefinition of the threat in the Mediterranean. Alliance now cannot refrain from revising Indeed, the perception of the threat and its location has its Mediterranean vision for security.» always been oriented towards the southern shore of the Mediterranean, seen as the only source of instability It is not so much a structural strategic imbalance factors. between the two sides of the Mediterranean than it is a Mediterranean situational paradox that distorts « NATO provides tailored expertise and the partnership; the conceptual and operational over- contributes to the convergence of standards expansion of NATO occurs within a context of a and procedures. Mediterranean partners geopolitical contraction of the Mediterranean’s southern are in turn invited to participate in part in shore. maintaining peace operations.» One of the first projects in reconceptualizing the partnership should focus on the level of visibility of one The geopolitical and security changes underway are another’s strategic intentions. beginning to undermine this certainty, so it is legitimate to speak of a threat on multiple scales: just as it is true that The partnership will gain in relevance if NATO clarifies its the threat is changing in nature and geography: stance (that it still seems to hesitate between) : on the one hand, its Euro-Atlantic centrality and collective defense First, tensions between the Western countries and Russia (Article 5 of the Washington Treaty) and, on the other, cause strategic threats to resurface. Strengthening NATO's its strategic projection abroad through partnerships and military presence in Eastern Europe and the Baltic military intervention (Afghanistan, Libya) (Article 4 - countries is a perfect example. NATO defense ministers political consultations). The first is a constant because in Brussels adopted dissuasive measures against Russia on February 10, 2016. The objective is to rapidly deploy it is the Alliance’s purpose and identity; the second is a 5 variable or a dynamic full of uncertainties as illustrated ground, air and naval forces in threatened regions. As 3. "The MD countries are free to choose the pace and extent of their 5. NATO reinforces its defense and deterrence position, cooperation with the Alliance; NATO does not intend to impose anything www.nato.int/cps/fr on them." 4. The Royal Armed Forces (FAR) are the only professional army in the Maghreb since a Royal Decree dated August 31, 2006 abolished the conscription. 2 OCP Policy Center Policy Brief such, the United States intends to strengthen its military threat both for Europe and for the Southern shore of the presence in Europe by allocating a budget of $ 3.4 billion Mediterranean, given the ease with which they can travel to the initiative. Transposed to the Mediterranean, this between the two sides, especially in the North-South rivalry seems to manifest with Russia’s diplomatic, sense.7 This situation should place the hybrid threat at strategic and geo-economic return: Will we see a strategic the center of the MD, since the terrorist networks use rebalancing, even as NATO and the Western powers have unconventional means to achieve their goals by taking strategic monopoly in the Mediterranean? It is still early advantage of the structural limits of the States and NATO to make a comprehensive and thorough assessment, as itself. This is one more reason to guide the fight against long as the speed of events fails to enable a clear forecast terrorism towards the strengthening of border control of what configuration will emerge from this dynamic. capacities, cyber defense, and management of terrorist However, preliminary indications highlight Russia's threats, through the transfer of technology solutions to desire to position itself as a regulator and referee of the partners. Mediterranean game, as demonstrated by its role in the Syrian crisis. Lastly, the demographic issue provides a challenge to the Mediterranean and globally because of its strategic « If one pools the security efforts of this consequences in terms of conflict and security. If the dialogue with the economic commitment demographic transition seems underway in the Maghreb of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership, an with a fertility rate of 2.3 for Morocco and Tunisia, and 2.7 for Algeria, in the Sahel-Saharan region and in West overall vision and effective management Africa the situation is more complex, if not dramatic, and of the problem could therefore be it will be increasingly so based on UNICEF’s demographic implemented.» projections8: the fertility rate is 7.6 in Niger, about 6.5 in Mali, 6 in Chad, 4.7 in Mauritania, 4.3 in Sudan, and Furthermore, the Southern Mediterranean does not 5.3 in Nigeria. So, according to these forecasts, Niger's yet have a collective mode of governance to guarantee population will increase from 19 million in 2015 to 69 solidarity and a comprehensive treatment of new million in 2050, in 2050 Nigeria will be the third largest asymmetric factors that may cause a crisis. The Libyan globally with 433 million inhabitants, while Egypt could and Malian crises give way to an instability that affects reach a population of 180 million.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Other Co-Operation Initiatives in the Mediterranean
    6 Anexos ingles ES07:00 Med. en cifrasgraf 13/9/07 11:19 Página 359 Chronologies Other Cooperation Initiatives in the Mediterranean 1. NATO’s Mediterranean This occurred, for instance, in October Since 1997, the measures of practical Dialogue and the Istanbul 2001 following the September 11 at- cooperation for enhancing mutual trust Cooperation Initiative tacks and in 2004 to celebrate the ten are laid down in an annual Work Pro- Appendices years of the MD. The political dimen- gramme that comprises a wide range of In January 1994, in view of the positive sion of the Dialogue includes visits by security-related activities. results of the Peace process in the senior NATO officials to MD countries to At their Summit meeting in Istanbul in Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the heads of meet with their authorities and become 2004, NATO leaders committed to work state and government taking part in the more familiar with the objectives and towards making the MD a true Partner- Brussels NATO Summit called for a new priorities of each country. The practical ship and individualising priority areas in 2007 initiative geared toward Mediterranean dimension includes activities aimed at the document, “A more Ambitious and countries that were not NATO mem- planning for civil emergencies, crisis Expanded Framework for the Mediter- Med. bers. The main objective of the Mediter- management and border security, in ad- ranean Dialogue” aimed at enhancing ranean Dialogue (MD) was, and still is, dition to a military programme. The lat- political dialogue; developing defence to contribute to regional stability and ter includes the possibility for Mediter- system reforms and contributing to the security, improve the mutual under- ranean Partners to observe NATO’s fight against terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Potential to Counteract Hybrid Threats Through Cooperation and Regional Security
    Information & Security: An International Journal Emil Eftimov, v.39:1, 2018, 13-20 https://doi.org/10.11610/isij.3901 BUILDING A POTENTIAL TO COUNTERACT HYBRID THREATS THROUGH COOPERATION AND REGIONAL SECURITY Vice Admiral Emil EFTIMOV Abstract: The main goal of this article is to present and discuss the opportunities to deepen cooperation between the Alliance and partners in countering hybrid threats. The focus is put on the eastern and southern NATO flanks, where the most advanced partner formats like Partnership for Peace (PfP) and Mediterranean Dialog (MD) have been developed. The first conclusion is that NATO partnership programs and the vari- ous initiatives in the interest of the partners are aimed at achieving stability in the pe- riphery of the Alliance by increasing partners’ resilience to various types of threats. In addition, the author argues that success in countering hybrid threats in the current se- curity environment is impossible without parallel and coordinated action of NATO in coordination with other international organizations, especially the European Union. Keywords: NATO, EU, Partnership for Peace, Mediterranean Dialogue, hybrid threats, resilience, international military cooperation. Introduction The strategy on NATO role in countering the hybrid type of war states that the first reaction or response comes from the nation under threat / attack, and the member states of NATO should build a set of capabilities and countermeasures. Also, there is a provision for the possibility of help or assistance by organizations whose members or partners these states are. In this case, the fundamental role of NATO in supporting the member states and partners is in the military aspect.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Nato Work?
    WHAT IS NATO? Visit our website : www.nato.int #WEARENATO The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is one of the These countries meet to cooperate in the field of world’s major international institutions. It is a political security and defence. In this respect, NATO provides and military alliance that brings together 30 member a unique link between these two continents for political countries from Europe and North America. and security cooperation. PROTECTING PEOPLE COMBATING NEW THREATS We often take it for granted that we can walk around freely in As the nature of threats changes, so must the methods a safe and economically stable environment. Security in all of preserving peace. NATO is reorienting its defence areas of everyday life is key to our well-being. capabilities towards today’s threats. It is adapting forces and developing multinational approaches to deal with terrorism, FORGING PARTNERSHIPS failed states and other security threats such as weapons of mass destruction. Establishing dialogue and cooperation is crucial for peaceful relations and deeper international understanding. BUILDING PEACE & STABILITY NATO provides a unique opportunity for member and partner countries to consult on security issues to build trust The benefits of stability can be enjoyed simultaneously by and, in the long run, help to prevent conflict. many parties. Through practical cooperation and multilateral initiatives, It is crucial to stabilise regions where tensions pose security countries are facing new security challenges together. threats. This is why NATO takes an active role in crisis- management operations, in cooperation with other international organisations. WHAT DOES NATO DO? NATO is committed to protecting its members efforts fail, it has the military capacity needed to through political and military means.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's Mediterranean Dialogue, As Well As to Get a Better Appreciation of Each Partner's Specific Objectives and Priorities
    RESEARCH PAPER No. 137 NOVEMBER 2009 NATO’s MEDITERRANEAN DIALOGUE: AN ASSESSMENT YANNIS A. STIVACHTIS (Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University and Senior Advisor at RIEAS) BENJAMIN JONES (Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University) RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR EUROPEAN AND AMERICAN STUDIES (RIEAS) # 1, Kalavryton Street, Alimos, Athens, 17456, Greece RIEAS url: www.rieas.gr RIEAS MISSION STATEMENT Objective The objective of the Research Institute for European and American Studies (RIEAS) is to promote the understanding of international affairs. Special attention is devoted to transatlantic relations, intelligence studies and terrorism, European integration, international security, Balkan and Mediterranean studies, Russian foreign policy as well as policy making on national and international markets. Activities The Research Institute for European and American Studies seeks to achieve this objective through research, by publishing its research papers on international politics and intelligence studies, organizing seminars, as well as providing analyses via its web site. The Institute maintains a library and documentation center. RIEAS is an institute with an international focus. Young analysts, journalists, military personnel as well as academicians are frequently invited to give lectures and to take part in seminars. RIEAS maintains regular contact with other major research institutes throughout Europe and the United States and, together with similar institutes in Western Europe, Middle East, Russia and Southeast Asia. Status The Research Institute for European and American Studies is a non-profit research institute established under Greek law. RIEAS’s budget is generated by membership subscriptions, donations from individuals and foundations, as well as from various research projects. The Institute is autonomous organization. Its activities and views are independent of any public or private bodies, and the Institute is not allied to any political party, denominational group or ideological movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Dialogue. the Barcelona Process
    Mediterranean dialogue. The Barcelona Process Source: CVCE. José Luis Neila Hernández. Copyright: (c) CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/mediterranean_dialogue_the_barcelona_process-en- 2c8f7745-69f4-469e-8d5b-6ded200fec64.html Last updated: 08/07/2016 1/4 Mediterranean dialogue. The Barcelona Process José Luis Neila Hernández The Mediterranean is an open book whose pages testify to the complexity of a history marked by meetings of minds and misunderstandings between Europeans and the Islamic-Arab world. Over the last two centuries, these sideways glances and the Mediterranean’s geo-historic reality have developed along uneven lines manifested, for example, in European/Western hegemony, embodied in colonialism, and the Arab world’s increasing awareness of its position, expressed through a search for new directions prompted by the Arab Renaissance (Nahda), and for ways to embrace Western European modernity while preserving its identifying codes. Decolonisation was to focus debate within southern Mediterranean Islamic-Arab societies on how to meet the challenge of modernisation and identity preservation. The development of international society — the Cold War and the profound changes occurring in its wake — and of the very future of Europe, particularly the European integration process, were to have far-reaching consequences in the Mediterranean. This area has been an abiding concern since the early days of European integration because of its connection with certain European countries, particularly France.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO and the Mediterranean1
    Strategic Sectors | Security & Politics 1 Panorama NATO and the Mediterranean Charlotte Brandsma play a central role in an effective strategy South. Senior Program Officer, Mediterranean Programme This article will take a closer look at the current The German Marshall Fund of the United States, Brussels and future challenges that the Mediterranean se- curity environment poses to the alliance, discuss Strategic Sectors | Security & Politics the evolving strategy of NATO towards the region 4 April 2019 marked the 70th anniversary of the and how that strategy is perceived by regional signing of the Washington Treaty, the founding stakeholders. It will argue that, to remain relevant document of the North Atlantic Treaty Organiza- in the future, NATO must put more energy and re- tion (NATO). A time for celebration, but also a time sources into its partnerships and focus on the for reflection on the strengths and weaknesses of Mediterranean Dialogue partnership, as well as on the alliance, and its readiness to confront the cooperation with the European Union and other threats of the future from both within NATO and regional and international organizations.3 beyond its borders. As NATO Secretary General 232 Jens Stoltenberg noted in his speech in front of the United States Congress, the organization faces an Why the Mediterranean Matters unprecedented set of challenges, including a gen- erational fight against terrorism, containing a more The Mediterranean space holds an enormous assertive Russia, competition with China and the amount of challenges
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Dialogue
    PRESS - INFO - PRESS MEDITERRANEAN DIALOGUE The Washington Summit will give fresh impetus to developing NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue, which was launched in 1994 and currently involves six non-NATO countries: Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Mauritania, Morocco and Tunisia. The Dialogue is aimed at creating good relations and better mutual understanding throughout the Mediterranean, and at promoting security and stability in the region. It reflects the view that security in that region is linked to security in Europe. Political discussions with participating countries provide an opportunity to share views on a range of security issues relevant to the region. Moreover, an annual work programme sets out measures for practical cooperation that focus on building confidence through cooperation on security related issues in the military field, as well as in the areas of information, civil emergency planning and science. All participating countries are offered the same basis for discussion and activities but the level of engagement varies from country to country. Activities take place on a self-funding basis. This limits the capacity of some countries to participate. In December 1998, NATO Foreign Ministers agreed to explore ways of enhancing cooperation with Mediterranean Dialogue countries. As a result, Heads of State and Government have decided to enhance both the political and practical dimensions of the Dialogue, including through further opportunities for discussion and strengthened cooperation in areas where NATO can bring an added value, particularly in the military field, and where the Dialogue countries have expressed interest. NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue complements other international efforts in the region such as the European Union’s Barcelona Process, the Middle East Peace Process, and the Mediterranean initiatives of the Western European Union (WEU) and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
    [Show full text]
  • Other Cooperation Initiatives in the Mediterranean
    Chronologies Other Cooperation Initiatives in the Mediterranean s e c i d n e 1. NATO Mediterranean Dialogue share views on security matters and dis - self-differentiation while preserving uni - p p and Istanbul Cooperation Initiative cuss the current status of the MD. The ty and the non-discriminatory character A structure of the MD can be conducted on of the MD. This improvement in the prac - The Mediterranean Dialogue (MD) is a bilateral level (that is to say 26 NATO tical field of the MD consisted in: pro - considered an integral part of the North countries and the MD country interested), moting military-to-military cooperation, Atlantic Alliance’s cooperative approach on a multilateral level (involving the 26 combating terrorism through effective to security and it reflects the Alliance’s NATO countries and the 7 MD countries) intelligence sharing and maritime co - 8 0 views that security in Europe is deeply or, finally, on a regional level (involving operation, promoting democratic control 0 2 linked to stability in the Mediterranean re - two or more countries in the cooperation). of armed forces and enhancing coop - . d e gion. The MD indeed aims at: contribut - The dialogue is progressive in terms of eration in the area of civil emergency M ing to regional security and stability, participation and substance, thus allow - planning. At the same Summit, the Al - achieving better mutual understanding ing the number of partners and the con - liance, considering itself ready for new between NATO and its Mediterranean tent of the Dialogue to evolve over time. challenges, decided to undertake a new Partners and dispelling misconceptions Besides, all the Mediterranean partners initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the MED How NATO Can Refocus Its Efforts in the South and Italy Can Lead the Charge
    MORE IN THE MED How NATO Can Refocus its Efforts in the South and Italy Can Lead the Charge Ambassador (Ret.) Alexander R. Vershbow Lauren M. Speranza The Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security works to develop sustainable, nonpartisan strat- egies to address the most important security challenges facing the United States and the world. The Center honors General Brent Scowcroft’s legacy of service and embodies his ethos of non- partisan commitment to the cause of security, support for US leadership in cooperation with allies and partners, and dedication to the mentorship of the next generation of leaders. The Scowcroft Center’s Transatlantic Security Initiative brings together top policymakers, gov- ernment and military officials, business leaders, and experts from Europe and North America to share insights, strengthen cooperation, and develop innovative approaches to the key challenges facing NATO and the transatlantic community. This report was produced as part of the Transatlantic Security Initiative’s work focused on NATO’s southern neighborhood and Mediterranean security, in partnership with Leonardo. About Our Partner Leonardo is a true transatlantic company. Headquartered in Italy, the company has a global foot- print with major industrial activities in Italy, Poland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Leonardo recognizes the importance of NATO and the critical role its industrial dimension plays in enabling the Alliance to meet its objectives. To that end, Leonardo has been a consistent and long-term provider of security technology and expertise to NATO across its strategic systems, including Alliance Ground Surveillance (AGS), Air Command and Control System - Integrated Air Missile Defence (ACCS – IAMD), Allied Future Surveillance and Control (AFSC), cyber defense (NCIRC), and electronic warfare.
    [Show full text]
  • MEIJI INSTITUTE for GLOBAL AFFAIRS MIGA Column “Global Diagnosis”
    MEIJI INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL AFFAIRS MIGA Column “Global Diagnosis” June 01, 2016 Kei Nakagawa Visiting Professor, Meiji Institute for Global Affairs, Meiji University Short Curriculum Vitae) Kei Nakagawa Hagoromo University of International Studies Faculty of Social SciencesProfessor Ph.D.(Middle Eastern and North African Studies), University of Tokyo. Assumed her present post after working as a Visiting Researcher at the Mohammed V University (Rabat), a Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and Researcher and Cultural Attaché at the Embassy of Japan to Tunisia. Her specialty is Middle Eastern and North African Studies. She particularly specializes in North African political history and contemporary politics. She worked as an international electoral observer for the parliamentary election of the Kingdom of Morocco in November 2011. The Current Situation of Trans-Mediterranean Cooperation and Challenges for the Future The ancient Romans, who controlled the entire Mediterranean region, called the present day Mediterranean “Our Sea (Mare Nostrum).” In the age of the Roman Empire, which achieved victory in the wars with Carthage, in present-day Tunisia, and ruled over the entire Mediterranean region, the Mediterranean Sea was the Roman inland sea. Since then, while the Mediterranean has been the setting of many battles, its coastal areas have also come to enjoy rich prosperity. This Mediterranean is now a sea of refugees risking their lives to cross over into Europe, and has become a region of frequently occurring terrorism, not only Syria and Libya, where civil wars have yet to be settled but Europe too, on the northern coast of the Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Security After EU and Nato Enlargement
    © Rubbettino Military Centre for Strategic Studies - Rome ZTBW Bundeswehr Transformation Center - Berlin © Rubbettino Mediterranean security after EU and Nato enlargement A joint research project between Military Centre for Strategic Studies (Rome) and Bundeswehr Transformation Center (Berlin) ZTBw team Ralph Thiele, Wolf Kinzel, Frank Kolstelnik, Gerd Föhrenbach CeMiSS team Carlo Finizio, Olga Mattera, Paolo Quercia Rubbettino © Rubbettino Copyright © by CeMiSS Centro Militare di Studi Strategici Piazza della Rovere, 83 - 00165 Roma (RM) e-mail: [email protected] © 2005 - Rubbettino Editore 88049 Soveria Mannelli - Viale Rosario Rubbettino, 10 -Tel. (0968) 662034 www.rubbettino.it © Rubbettino Sommario 1 Foreword p. 7 2 Executive Summary 9 3 Part One: Introduction 3.1 Creating the “Common Security Area Europe” 17 3.2 Living the EU-NATO Strategic Partnership 19 4 Part Two: Perceptions of the enlargements 4.1 Effects of EU and NATO Enlargements on the Mediterra- nean: Italian and German Points of View 25 4.1.1 Italian interests 25 4.1.2 German interests 34 4.2 Core Findings of selected national perceptions 42 4.2.1 The new EU member states 42 4.2.1.1 Cyprus 42 4.2.1.2 Malta 43 4.2.1.3 Slovenia 44 4.2.2 The Would-be EU-Members 46 4.2.2.1 Turkey 46 4.2.2.2 Bulgaria 50 4.3 Core findings on regional points of view 51 4.3.1 The Mediterranean Dialogue Countries and NATO 51 4.3.1.1 The Eastern Mediterranean Countries: Egypt, Jordan and Israel 51 4.3.1.2 The Western Mediterranean Countries: Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya 55 5 © Rubbettino 4.3.2 The Mediterranean Dialogue Countries and the European Union p.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Cooperation Initiatives in the Mediterranean
    Chronologies Appendices Other Cooperation Initiatives in the Mediterranean 1. NATO’s Mediterranean mentary to other regional or interna- small arms & light weapons, public di- Dialogue and Istanbul tional initiatives; it has both a political plomacy, scientific and environmental Cooperation Initiative and practical dimension. Until 2011, the cooperation, as well as consultations on overall responsibility for the MD fell to terrorism and the proliferation of weap- Instability in the Mediterranean region is the Mediterranean Cooperation Group ons of mass destruction (WMD). The important to NATO Allies and partners (MCG), established at the Madrid Sum- military dimension of the practical coop- both for humanitarian and geopolitical mit in 1997. It was then replaced by the eration includes invitations to Dialogue reasons as security in the Middle East Political and Partnerships Committee, countries to observe – and in some and North Africa is organically related which is responsible for all partnerships. cases participate – in NATO/PfP military to security in Europe. NATO has devel- The Committee meets at the level of exercises, attend courses and other Other Cooperation Initiatives in the Mediterranean oped a network of partnership with Political Counsellors on a regular basis academic activities at the NATO School seven southern Mediterranean countries to discuss all matters related to the (SHAPE) in Oberammergau (Germany) under the Mediterranean Dialogue Dialogue including its further develop- and the NATO Defense College in (MD), as well as with four countries of ment. At the 2004 Istanbul Summit, Rome (Italy), and visit NATO military the Gulf region through the Istanbul NATO’s Heads of State and Govern- bodies.
    [Show full text]