Minutes of the Meeting of the Screening Committee meeting held on 5th June, 2012 for scrutiny/recommending of new cases under the scheme of grant in aid to Voluntary Organizations working for Scheduled Castes.

The screening committee meeting was held on 5th June, 2012 under the chairmanship of Shri Sanjeev Kumar, Joint Secretary (SCD). The two non-official members of the Committee present were (i) Shri M.B. Deshmukh, Secretary, Servants of Society and (ii) Dr. Bezwada Wilson, Convenor, Safai Karmachari Andolan.

2. At the outset, the Committee was informed about the budget allocation for 2012-13 under the scheme, notional allocation fixed for the States/UTs within the budgetary outlay, committed liability for funding existing ongoing projects, number of proposals already recommended by the Screening Committee during last years but grants are yet to be released and number of proposals received during 2011-12 & 2012-13. In this connection, the Committee was informed that as per the policy decision in the Ministry’s Office Order No.1- 31/2006-Cdn., dated 05.09.2008 and 23.02.2009, recommendations of the State GIA Committee for new projects would remain valid for the financial year following the year in which they were received and recommendations of the Screening Committee within the Ministry would also remain valid for one year following the year in which they are recommended. The Committee was also informed that as per the Scheme, recommendations of State/UT Grants-in- Aid Committee along with inspection reports for the current year are required each and every year for releasing of grant to any project proposal under the Scheme.

3. The committee adopted the following parameters for selection of new cases during the year 2012-13:-

(i) Mandatory Recognition of the schools under the relevant statute.

(ii) As per this Ministry’s O.M. No.62-01/2007-cdn dated 27.09.2007, top priority to be given to the projects of schools. Priority for other projects are to be decided by the Committee.

(iii) Computer education projects should be recognized by DOEACC/Universities/Accreditation bodies.

(iv) School projects to be considered only where the SC rural female literacy level of the District is not more than 30% as per 2001 census, alternatively such projects in districts where SC female literacy rate is less than that of State level.

(v) Not more than 2 similar projects are to be allowed in the same district;

(vi) As a pre-requisite, Proposals are essentially required to be recommended by the State GIA Committee.

(vii) The project related to control of Blindness should be considered by the Disability Division in the Ministry or Deptt. of Health, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare.

(viii) In case of projects namely Ten Bedded/Mobile Dispensary the medical/Para medical staff engaged by the Organisation should essentially have the requisite Professional qualification and furnish attested photocopies thereof, besides NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE to run it from competent medical authority in the State.

(ix) Intra state priorities taken into consideration SCs population of the State concerned.

(x) Availability of fund allocated under the scheme

(xi) The rejected cases to be returned to the State Govt. concerned.

4. As per general guidelines for assisting Non-Governmental Organizations/Voluntary Organizations, “in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organization should have been registered for a period of at least 2 years and should have been actively working in its sector for a period of 2 years. Such projects will not be taken up for assistance where the activities are proposed to commence after the project is sanctioned and funds released by the Ministry.” The NGO should also fulfill other conditions required under the scheme as per checklist prescribed in this regard.

5. The Committee has taken into account the prevailing status of performance in the existing scheme and financial availability for undertaking new projects. While doing so the committee may take note of the fact that the Ministry has already been funding around 600 projects through 400 NGOs spread out in the country.

5. It is evident from the releases for the years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 that some States have been receiving substantial shares of the total grant-in-aid released under the Scheme disproportionate their SC population percentage. These States are , Assam, , , Maharashtra, Manipur, Rajasthan & Orissa. In some States namely, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Tripura & Uttaranchal, grant-in-aid share moderately exceed their SC population percentage. Other states namely Bihar, Chhattisgarh, , Jharkhand, Kerala, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh & West Bengal receive proportionately less grant-in-aid in relation to their SC population percentage.

6. In this meeting, 60 new cases screened and 6 cases those considered in the previous meeting reviewed consequent upon submission of further clarifications/documents by the NGOs, after deliberation at length and decision thereon has been incorporated in the Annexure attached to these minutes.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Member

(Sanjeev Kumar) Chairman of the Screening Committee New Proposals received under the Scheme of 'Grant-in-aid to Voluntary Organisations working for Scheduled Castes' from various State Governments and to be placed before the Screening Committee meeting to be held on 5th June, 2012 S. Name of Name of the Project Location of the No. of Comments Recommendation No the State Organization with applied for Project benefici of the Screening complete address aries Committee 1 Himachal Women & Child Craft Women 50 The Application-cum-Monitoring Form is not available in the Not recommended Pradesh Development Society, Training Empowerment proposal. IR of the State Government shows date of Village nad P.O. centre Centre, Village commencement of the project as '2012-13'. Audited A/cs Masroond, Tehsil and Dobhi, P.O. for the year 2008-09 and 2009-10 do not show the Distt. Chamba, Kohal, Tehsil expenditure incurred by the organisation on the project Himachal Pradesh Churah, Distt. applied for. Hence, not eligible. Chamba-176319 2 Karnataka Ashwini Priyadarshini Mobile Sri Chetana Not IR of the State Government does not specify the number of Not recommended Rural Development Dispensary Mobile Hospital specified SC beneficiaries found at the time of inspection. List of Social Educational and at Mukkundur under the beneficiaries and Annual reports for the last two years have Health Organization scheme not been submitted. It is no where established in the No.1890, Ramakrishna proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC Nursing Home beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para Building, Behind PWD 2.2(g) of the scheme. Audited A/c of the project of Mobile Quarters, M.G. Road, Dispensary made available of only year. Consolidated Hassan City, Distt. Audited A/c of the organisation has also not been submitted Hassan with the proposal. Hence, not eligible.

3 Karnataka Gangambhika Mahila Craft Indira Gandhi 50 IR of the State Government and Application-cum-Monitoring Not recommended Mandal, Bedkunda Training Craft training Form do not show any date of commencement of the Village, Bavage centre Centre, Bawage project. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs Complex, Aurad (B), Complex, under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be Tq. And Distt. Bidar, Thanakushnoor eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have Karnataka , Tq. Aurad, been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Bidar Accounts in four parts of the project for which grant in aid is sought containing Income and Expenditure statement, Receipt and Payment statement, Balance Sheet and Auditors Report are not submitted alongwith the proposal. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 4 Karnataka Gnanaganga Residential Yellamma 400 IR of the State Government and Application-cum-Monitoring Not recommended Educational Trust, #53, Secondary Palya, Anekal, Form show date of commencement of the project as Dodda Hagade School Kasaba Hobli, '28.05.2011'. However, the guidelines for assisting the Dhakle, Yallammana Anekal, NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to Palya, Sidi Hoskote Bangalore be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should Post, Kasaba Hobli, Urban Dist. have been actively working in its sector for a period of two Bangalore Urban years. Accounts in four parts of the Organisation and the Distt., Karnataka project for which grant in aid is sought containing Income and Expenditure statement, Receipt and Payment statement, Balance Sheet and Auditors Report are not submitted alongwith the proposal. Audited Accounts submitted are for GVS College of Managaement Studies. Hence not eligible 5 Karnataka Grama Mandal Trust, Non Kolur L.T. Tq. 100 Date of the Commencement of the project is not shown in Not recommended Kolur Tanda, Residenital Muddebihal, the Application-cum-Monitoring Form. Memorandum of Muddebehal Taluk, Primary Distt. Bijapur Association does not mandate it to run a School. The Distt. Bijapur-586129 School project of the school for which grant has been applied for is not a recognised one under the State Government statute. The recognition of the School is mandatory requirement since inception of the RTE Act, 2009. Consolidated Accounts of the organization has not been submitted with the proposal. Hence, not eligible. 6 Madhya Lovkush Shiksha and Non Lancer Convent 100 There is no reflection of the activity of running School for Not recommended Pradesh Samajik Karya Vikas Residential Modern School, SCs in the Consolidated Audited Accounts of the Samiti, Laxmipur Primary Laxmipura organization submitted with the proposal. Accounts in four Ward, Sagar, MP School Ward, parts of the project for which grant in aid is sought Champawag, containing Income and Expenditure statement, Receipt and Sagar, MP Payment statement, Balance Sheet and Auditors Report are not submitted alongwith the proposal. List of beneficiaries is not in prescribed format. The SC female literacy rate in Distt. Sagar is 39.23% as per census 2001, which is higher than the prescribed norms under the guidelines as 30%. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 7 Madhya PUNCH (People Union Handmade Narsinghpur 50 IR of the State Government is not available with the Not recommended Pradesh for New Change for Paper and (proposed) proposal. As per Application-cum-Monitoring, the date of Humanity), A-47, 3rd Income commencement of the project is mentioned as 'Proposed'. floor, Takshila generating However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the Apartment, Patpat programme scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for Ganj, Delhi-110092 for SC assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been women actively working in its sector for a period of two years. It is no where established in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the Scheme.The Projects recommended by the State Government is not covered under the Scheme of 'Grant-in- aid to Voluntary Organisations working for Scheduled Castes. Hence, not eligible. 8 Madhya Ravi Shikshan Samiti, Residential Nutan Ashram 100 There is no approval from the State Government for running Not recommended Pradesh Nipaniya Goyal Post School School, Itawa, the residential primary School at Dewas. Out of the 100 Nazarpur, Tehsil Ujjain Road, students, 70 students have been promoted to the next class Ghatiya, Distt. Ujjain, Dewas Distt., . Hence, the date of entry of all the 100 students in the MP M.P. school cannot be 1.4.2011. The Annual Report submitted by the NGO does not give details of the activities of the School. The rent agreement is in the name of individual and not in the name of the NGO concerned. None of the documents submitted along with the proposal is attested by a Gazetted Officer or by the Notary Public as required. Hence, not eligible. 9 Madhya Ravi Shikshan Samiti, Residential Nutan Ashram 100 The School is already getting grant-in-aid to the tune of Not recommended Pradesh Nipaniya Goyal Post School School,Tandel Rs.5 Lakhs from the State Government as per their Income Nazarpur, Tehsil Compound, and Expenditure statement. In accordance with the Scheme Ghatiya, Distt. Ujjain, Agar, Shajapur of Ministry the NGO should submit a Verification Certificate MP Distt., M.P. to the effect that they are not getting Grant in aid from any other source, private, public or foreign. Out of the 100 students, only 70 students have been promoted to the next class . The date of entry of all the 100 students in the school cannot be 1.4.2011. The Annual Report submitted by the NGO does not give details of the activities of the School. The rent agreement is in the name of individual and not in the name of the NGO concerned. None of the documents submitted along with the proposal is attested by a Gazetted Officer or by the Notary Public as required. Hence not eligible

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 10 Madhya Shree Rajendra Residential Gurukul 100 SC female literacy rate in Distt. Ujjain is 40.30% as per Not recommended Pradesh Jayantsen Suri Primary Academy census 2001, which is higher than the prescribed norms Shikshan Samiti,9, School Vidyalaya, 114, under the guidelines as 30%. Annual Report does not Billoti Pura, Dani Gate, 115, Vishva indicate activity of running Residential Primary School. Ujjain, M.P. Bank Colony, Audited A/cs for the year 2008-09 and 2010-11 do not Agar Road, show the expenditure incurred by the organisation on the Ujjain, M.P. project applied for. Hence, not eligible. 11 Madhya Vidya Vijay Educaiton Hostel Parkota, Sagar 100 There is no reflection of the activity of running Hostel for Not recommended Pradesh & Social Welfare (Secondary) SCs in the Consolidated Audited Accounts of the Society, Near Gour organization submitted with the proposal. Accounts in four Tower, Parkota, Sagar, parts of the project for which grant in aid is sought MP containing Income and Expenditure statement, Receipt and Payment statement, Balance Sheet and Auditors Report are not submitted alongwith the proposal. Annual Reports for the year 2008-09 to 2010-11 are reproduction of the same contents except change of year on the top of the Annual Reports. In the Inspection Report and Application cum Monitoring Form, the date of commencement of the project is 1.4.2009 whereas activity of the Hostel has also been shown in the Annual Report for the year 2008-09. These are contradictory facts. Hence, not eligible. 12 Madhya White Rose Education Hostel Village Kothri, 100 There is no reflection of the activity of running Hostel for Not recommended Pradesh & Welfare Society, A- (Secondary) Th. Ashta, Distt. SCs in the Consolidated Audited Accounts of the 160, Indra Vihar Sehore, MP organization submitted with the proposal. Audited Accounts Colony, Airport Road, in four parts of the project consisting of income and Bhopal, M.P. expenditure, reciept and Payments, balance sheet and auditor's report of the project for the last two years are not furnished, as required under the scheme. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 13 Maharashtra Aishwariya Ten Bedded Ward No.1, IR of the State Government is the xerox copy, which shows Not recommended Bhauddeshiya Hospital Bazar Road, the date of commencement of the project as '01.04.2008' Sanstha, 167, Mathani Post, whereas as per Application-cum-Monitoring, the same is Shiddarth Nagar, Teka Taluka Moudha, mentioned as '2010-11'. However, the guidelines for Kamptee Road, Distt. Nagpur assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides Nagpur-17, that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary Maharashtra organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Audited A/c and Annual Report for the years 2009-10 and 2010-11 does not have any mention of the project applied for by the Organisation. Hence, not eligible.

14 Maharashtra Asma Mahila Ten Bedded Lay out Bhosa IR of the State Government is the xerox copy. IR shows Not recommended Bahuuddeshiya Hospital Road, Distt. date of commencement of the project as 'New proposed Shikshan Sanstha, Yavatmal, project' whereas as per Application-cum-Monitoring, the Botha Road, Distt. Maharashtra same is mentioned as '03.09.2011'. However, the guidelines Yavatmal, Maharashtra for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. It is no where established in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Hence, not eligible.

15 Maharashtra Dr. S.N. Patil Mobile Kokrud, Tal. Not IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Foundation, Dispensary Shirala, Distt. specified of the project as 2011-12 whereas as per Application-cum- Turukhwadi, Post Sangli under the Monitoring Form, the same is mentioned as 01/05/2010. Kotoli, Tal. Shahuwadi, scheme However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the Distt. Kolhapur, scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for Maharashtra assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 16 Maharashtra Gayatridevi Gramin Ten Bedded At Post In the application-cum monitoring form the date of Not recommended Janseva Shikshan Hospital Salwade, Tal. & commencement of the project is mentioned as “proposed”. Sevabhavi Sanstha, Distt. Dhule, Further, under some other columns of application-cum monitoring Sawalde, Tal. & Distt. Maharashtra form viz. details of bank Account (item No. 12), Details of Dhule, Maharashtra beneficiaries (Item No.19) and details of income and expenditure during the year (item No. 20), the NGO has specifically noted that the project is proposed. In the IR of the State Govt, at Item No. 6(a)though it is separately mentioned that the project is proposed, somebody has added the date i.e. “1.6.2009”. In item No. 9 of IR, there is overwriting at the monthly rent. In the Memorandum of Association, there is no specific mandate to run a 10-bedded hospital. However, there is a vague statement “to make available medical aid to the poor and needy people”. The rent agreement submitted states that validity of the same is for 5 years from the date of starting of 10-bedded hospital. This was signed only on 17.4.2011 which implies that the 10-bedded hospital is not in existence as on date . Though the rent agreement is a photocopy, the signature of the landlord is added later on in ink. The audited accounts for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11 indicate that the expenditure of 10 beded hospital is Rs.5214 and 6123 respectively.The annual report for the year 2009-10 & 2010-11 has not referred about running any 10-bedded hospital. The copies of the certificate are not attested or, counter signed by any authority.Similarly, the list of beneficiaries from the year 2009 to 2011 is also not signed by anyone. Hence, not eligible.

17 Maharashtra Jai Durga Adivasi Hostel Sushil Boy's 100 Inspection report of the State Government signed by the Not recommended Gram Vikas Sanstha (Secondary) Hostel, Social Welfare Officer, Group-A, Z. P., Gondia is dated Tekabedar Th. Deori, Jamnapur, Th. 19.10.2011 whereas the date of inspection shown in the Distt. Gondia-441901 Deori, Distt. inspection report is 21.10.2011. Date and time mentioned in Gondia the inspection report is also overwritten. Against Column 18 of the Inspection Report of the State Government relating to number of beneficiaries found at the time of inspection, it is shown as 'new proposal'. Hence not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 18 Maharashtra Jai Durga Adivasi Hostel Aayushi Girls 100 Inspection report of the State Government signed by the Not recommended Gram Vikas Sanstha (Secondary) Hostel, Social Welfare Officer, Group-A, Z. P., Gondia is dated Tekabedar Th. Deori, Jamnapur, Th. 19.10.2011 whereas the date of inspection shown in the Distt. Gondia-441901 Deori, Distt. inspection report is 21.10.2011. Date mentioned in the Gondia inspection report is also overwritten. Against Column 18 of the Inspection Report of the State Government relating to number of beneficiaries found at the time of inspection, it is shown as 'new proposal'. Hence, not eligible.

19 Maharashtra Jai Hanuman Ten Bedded C/o. Shri Rakas Inspection Report of the State Government is the xerox Not recommended Bahhudeshiya Hospital House At copy. IR of the State Government shows date of Shikshan Sanstha, Sarwadi, Tah. commencement of the project as '12.04.2010' whereas as C/o. Shri Mahesh Karanja (Gha) per Application-cum-Monitoring, the same is mentioned as Jathe, Ward No. 5, Distt. Wardha, '01.04.2011'. As such there is contradiction in the date of House No. 155, Karla, Maharashtra commence of the project. However, the guidelines for Distt. Wardha, assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides Maharashtra that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Hence, not eligible.

20 Maharashtra Jai Jijamata Mahila Mobile Wadi Tal. & Not IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Mandal, Ssambhaji Dispensary Distt. Nanded specified of the project as 2011-12 whereas as per Application-cum- Nagar Taroda (Bk.), under the Monitoring Form, the same is mentioned as 'New Project'. Tal. & Ditt. Nanded, scheme Annual Reports do not indicate activity of running Mobile Maharashtra Dispensary. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. The list of beneficiaries is not provided so, It is difficult to establish in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Hence, not eligible. 21 Maharashtra Jijau Bahuuddeshiya Mobile Dusane, Tal. Not IR of the State Government does not show the number of Not recommended Sanstha, Fagne, Tal. & Dispensary Sakri, Distt. specified beneficiaries found present at the time of inspection. Distt. Dhule Dhule under the Inspection report of the State Government is also (Maharashtra) scheme incomplete as many of its column has been left blank. Annual Reports do not indicate activity of running Mobile Dispensary. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 22 Maharashtra Maha Parmpoojya Mobile At Ramajnapur Not It is no where established in the proposal that the Not recommended Parmatma Eak Dispensary Tola, Post specified Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, Satwaguwale Sevak Janampalli, under the which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the Bahuddeshiya Tah. Sironcha, scheme scheme. Annual Reports do not indicate activity of running Vruddashram Mandal, Distt. Mobile Dispensary. Accounts in four parts of the project for Ramanjapur Tola, Tah. Gadchiroli, which grant in aid is sought containing Income and Sironcha, Distt. Maharashtra Expenditure statement, Receipt and Payment statement, Gadchiroli Balance Sheet and Auditors Report are not submitted alongwith the proposal. Hence, not eligible.

23 Maharashtra Maharashtra Advance Computer proposed IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Training Centre, 866 training of the project as 'immediately after funding' whereas in the 'C', Akshari Apartment, centre Application-cum-Monitoring Form, the same is not Near Uma Theatre, mentioned. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs Ravivar Peth, Kolhapur- under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be 416007, Maharashtra eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Further, the proposal does not meet the mandatory requirement of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY. Hence, not eligible.

24 Maharashtra Maharashtra Advance Computer proposed IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Training Centre, 866 training of the project as 'immediately after funding'. However, the 'C', Akshari Apartment, centre guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter- Near Uma Theatre, alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a Ravivar Peth, Kolhapur- voluntary organisation should have been actively working in 416007, Maharashtra its sector for a period of two years. Further, the proposal does not meet the mandatory requirement of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 25 Maharashtra Maharashtra Advance Computer proposed IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Training Centre, 866 training of the project as 'immediately after funding' whereas in the 'C', Akshari Apartment, centre Application-cum-Monitoring Form, the same is not Near Uma Theatre, mentioned. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs Ravivar Peth, Kolhapur- under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be 416007, Maharashtra eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Further, the proposal does not meet the mandatory requirement of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY. Hence, not eligible.

26 Maharashtra Nagai Pratisthan,Plot Ten Bedded At Nagai IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended No.52, Shrikrushna Hosptial for Hospital, Sant of the project as '01.04.2011' whereas as per Application- Nagar, Tal. & Distt. SCs Kabir Nagar, cum-Monitoring, the same is mentioned as '01.04.20'. Dhule, Maharashtra Walwadi, Tal. & However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the Distt. Dhule, scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for Maharashtra assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Audited A/cs for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11 does not show the expenditure incurred by the organisation on the project activity applied for. Hence, not eligible.

27 Maharashtra Pallavi Gruh Uddog & Beauty Balaji Plot, Memorandum of Association does not specifically mandate Not recommended Bahuuddeshiya Parlour Rajapeth, it to run a Beauty Parlour Training Centre. Hence, not Sanstha, Balaji Plot, Training Amravati, eligible. Rajapeth, Amravati, Centre Maharashtra Maharashtra 28 Maharashtra Purogami Mobile At PO Not IR of the State Government and Application-cum-Monitoring Not recommended Bhhayuprasad Samaj Dispensary Gramsevak specified show date of commencement of the project as '02.10.2011'. Kalyan Vikas Vyayam Colony, under the However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the Prasarak Sanstha, Murtizapur, Tq. scheme scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for Shingnapur, Tq. Murtizapur, assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been Daryapur, Distt. Distt. Akola, actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Amravati, Maharashtra Maharashtra Further, there is no reference about the Mobile Dispensary in the Annual Report for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 29 Maharashtra Ramabai Ambedkar Computer Mahila Ashram, 50 IR shows the date of commencement of the project as 'The Not recommended Mahila Mandal, training Sevagram current batch is started on 01.07.2011'. There is no Dahegoan, Tal. & centre Road, Plot reference about the Computer Training Centre in the Distt. Wardha, No.4, Tal. & Annual Report for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11. However, Maharashtra Distt. Wardha the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Further, the proposal does not meet the mandatory requirement of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY. The Registration Certificate submitted is a notarised copy unsigned by Registrar/Assistant Registrar of Societies. Hence, not eligible. 30 Maharashtra Sadbhav Pariwar, 66, Ten Bedded 66, Mayur The State Government has recommended the proposal under the scheme of 'GIA to Mayur Colony, Hospital and Colony, Voluntary Organisations working for Scheduled Castes'. But IR and Application-cum- Pimprala, Jalgaon- Mobile Pimprala, Monitoring Form show that the organization has applied under the Scheme of 'Grant-in- 425001, Maharashtra Dispensary Jalgaon - aid to Voluntary Organisations working for Development of Other Backward Classes'. 425011 Para 17 of the Inspection report does not indicate any SC beneficiaries assisted by the organisation. Hence, the proposal may be sent to BC Division for necessary action under intimation to Government of Maharashtra and NGO. 31 Maharashtra Sahara Bahuudeshiya Ten Bedded Sant Tukaram Not the State Government has recommended the proposal Not recommended Sansatha, Ser. Hospital Nagar, Bhosari, specified under the scheme of 'GIA to Voluntary Organisations No.216, Sant Tukaram Pune-39 under the working for Scheduled Castes'. But IR shows that the Nagar, Bhosari, Pune- scheme organization has applied under the Scheme of 'Grant-in-aid 39 to Voluntary Organisations working for older persons'. IR of the State Government and Application-cum-Monitoring show date of commencement of the project as 'New Project'. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. It is no where established in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 32 Maharashtra Samta Bahhu- Mobile Yavatmal, Not IR of the State Government and Application-cum-Monitoring Not recommended uddeshiya Shikshan Dispensary Nagpur Distt. specified Form show date of commencement of the project as Sanstha, At Borgaon Near Salod under the '01.04.2011'. However, the guidelines for assisting the (Sawali), Distt. scheme NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to Wardha, Maharashtra be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. It is no where established in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Audited A/cs and Annual reports for the years 2009-10 and 2010-11 does not show the expenditure incurred by the organisation on the project applied for. Hence, not eligible.

33 Maharashtra Shree Gajanan Ten Bedded At Shahuwadi Date of inspection is not mentioned anywhere in the Not recommended Maharaj (shegaon) Hospital Taluka, Distt. Inspection report. IR of the State Government shows date Bhakt Mandal, Kolhapur, of commencement of the project as '2010'. The date of Educaitonal Rural Maharashtra commencement of the proggramme indicated as 'Fresh Development & Proposal' in part 'B' of the Application-cum-Monitoring Form. Multipurpose Society, However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the Shahuwadi Tal., Distt. scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for Kolhapur, Maharashtra assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. 'No Objection Certificate' for running the Hospital not submitted with the proposal. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 34 Maharashtra Shri Dhnyaneshwari Computer At Thakare 50 Inspection report (IR) of the State Government is the xerox Not recommended Samajik Shaikshnik & training Market Road, copy. IR shows the date of commencement of the project Vaidyakiya Sanstha, centre Gond Plot, as 'The current batch is started on 01.07.2011'. However, Sable Plot, Radha Distt. Wardha the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme Nagar, Behind Sanjay inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, Medical, Wardh Distt.- a voluntary organisation should have been actively working 442001, Maharashtra in its sector for a period of two years. There is no reference about the Computer Training Centre in the Annual Reports submitted. Audited A/c for the year 2009-10 is the photocopy of the Accounts of the year 2010-11, only the year has been been changed by tampering. Further, the proposal does not meet the mandatory requirement of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY. Hence, not eligible. 35 Maharashtra Subhashish Computer C/o Platinum 50 In the Column No.19 of Inspection Report of the State Not recommended Bahuudeshiya training Computer Government, it is mentioned that this is first year of the Sanstha, C/o Platinum centre Institute, In inception of the project. However, the guidelines for Computer Institute, In front of Paras assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides front of Paras Ice Ice Factory, that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary Factory, Batchlor Batchlor Road, organisation should have been actively working in its sector Road, Tal. & Distt. Tal. & Distt. for a period of two years. Further, the proposal does not Wardha Wardha meet the mandatory requirement of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY. Hence, not eligible 36 Maharashtra Universal Versatile Computer Vidarbha 50 IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Society, Vidarbha training Infotech, Near of the project as 01.06.2011 whereas as per Application- Infotech, Near centre Rajasthan cum-Monitoring Form, the same is mentioned as 2011. Rajasthan College, College Road, However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the Washim-444505, Washim- scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for Maharashtra 444505, assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been Maharashtra actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Audited A/cs and Annual reports for the years 2009-10 and 2010-11 does not show the expenditure incurred by the organisation on the project applied for. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 37 Manipur Integrated Rural Residential Thongjao 100 The SC female literacy rate in Distt. Thoubal is 58.62% as Not recommended Development and School Thongkhong per census 2001, which is higher than the prescribed norms Educational SC Village, under the guidelines as 30%. Hence, not eligible. Organization (IRDEO), P.O. & P.S. Wangbal, PO & P.S. Kakching, Thoubal Distt., Manipur- Thoubal Distt., 795138 Manipur

38 Rajasthan Bharti Vikas Sansthan, SC Hostel Basbadanpura, 100 IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended 1346, Kaithwal Ganapole, of the project as 'After sanction' whereas as per Application- Bhawan, Behind Jaipur, cum-Monitoring, the same is mentioned as 'as per sanction'. Chamu House, Rajasthan However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the Gangapole, Jaipur, scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for Rajasthan assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Hence, not eligible.

39 Rajasthan Deep Vidya Mandir SC Hostel Gayatri Nagar, 100 Annual Report submitted by the organisation does not show Not recommended Samiti (DVMS), Dausa Tehsil and Distt. the activity of Hostel being run by the organisation. Gayatri Nagar, Dausa Dausa-303303, Inspection Report of the State Government does not Tehsil and Distt. Rajasthan indicate the number of SC beneficiaries found present at Dausa-303303, the time of inspection. Audited A/cs also do not show the Rajasthan expenditure incurred by the organisation on this project. The proposal does not name the school in which the benficiaries are studying and whether this school is recognised or, not. It is no where established in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme Hence not eligible

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 40 Rajasthan Raghunathpura Non Village 100 IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Adarsh Vidya Mandir Residenital Raghunathpura of the project as 'After sanction' whereas as per Application- Samiti, School , Teshil Kotputli, cum-Monitoring, the same is mentioned as '2011-12'. Raghunathpura, Distt. Jaipur, However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the Kotputli, Jaipur, Rajasthan scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for Rajasthan assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. It is no where established in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Further, the SC female literacy rate in Distt. Jaipur is 39.01% as per census 2001, which is higher than the prescribed norms under the guidelines as 30%. Hence, not eligible. 41 Tamil Nadu Mahatama Gandhiji Computer 58/1, East 50 IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Seva Sangam, 58/1, training Bazar, of the project as '01.09.2010'. However, the guidelines for East Bazar, centre Vasudevanallur- assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides Vasudevanallur- 627758, that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary 627758, Tirunelveli Tirunelveli Distt, organisation should have been actively working in its sector Distt, Tamil Nadu Tamil Nadu for a period of two years. Audited accounts and anual reports for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11 does not have any reference of functioning of the Computer Training Centre. Further, the proposal does not contain the documents of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY. Hence, not eligible.

42 Tamil Nadu Thiruvalluvar Vocational Sri IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Educational and Rural Training Venkateswara of the project as 'On sanction of the project, this late will be Development Trust, Programme ITC Nagar & notification' whereas as per Application-cum-Monitoring, "Sri Venkateswara Post the same is mentioned as 'New'. However, the guidelines ITC" Nagar & Post Ulundurpet- for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides Ulundurpet-606107, 606107 that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary Villupuram, Tamil organisation should have been actively working in its sector Nadu for a period of two years. Annual reports opf the project are not available in the proposal. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 43 Uttar Abhiram Public School, Non Mahmoodpur, 100 IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Pradesh Mahamoodpur, Post Residential Bareri, Janupur of the project as 17.02.2003 whereas as per the Bareri, Distt. Jaunpur, School Application-cum-Monitoring Form, the same is mentioned as U.P. 'Proposed'. As such there is a contradiction in the date of commencement of the project. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Hence, not eligible.

44 Uttar Asian Education Computer PIMT, 2nd floor, IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Pradesh Academy, 403/239, training Jawahar of the project as 'Proposed 2011-12' whereas as per Chaupitiyan Colony, centre Bhawan, B Application-cum-Monitoring, the same is mentioned as 'After Lucknow Block, sanction'. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs Hazratganj, under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be Lucknow eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. it is no where established in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Further, the proposal does not contain the documents of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY. Hence, not eligible. 45 Uttar Gramin & Kamjor Varg Non Manapur, 100 Inspection report (IR) of the State Government is the xerox Not recommended Pradesh Kalyan Samiti, Residenital Itayen, Jaunpur, copy. IR and Application-cum-Monitoring Form show the Manapur, Itayen, School U.P. date of commencement of the project as 'Proposed'. Jaunpur, U.P. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Hence, not eligible. 46 Uttar Manara Devi Non Chak 100 IR of the State Government does not show any date of Not recommended Pradesh Prathamik Vidhaylaya, Residential Naryanpur, commencement of the project whereas as per the Chak Narayanpur, School Belwa Jaunpur, Application-cum-Monitoring Form, the same is mentioned as Belwa Jaunpur, U.P. U.P. 'Proposed'. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 47 Uttar Manas Dharam Computer Manas Vidya IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Pradesh Pracharak Samiti, training Mandir, Kanya of the project as 2010 whereas Application-cum-Monitoring Uchatila Tarinpur, centre Madhyamik Form does not have any mention of the same. However, the Village and Post Vidyalaya, guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter- Ramkot, Sitapur Ramkot, alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a Sitapur, U.P. voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Memorandum of Association though has a reference of 'Training Centre' but it does not specifically mandate it to run a Computer Training Centre. Hence, not eligible.

48 Uttar Nathupur Kisan Non Belahara PO 100 As per IR of the State Government, the organization is not Not recommended Pradesh Shiksha Parishad, Residential and Tehsil - catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a Village Nathupur, PO- Primary Sathion,Distt. mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Samaspur, Tah. School Azamgarh, U.P. List of beneficiaries is not in the prescribed format. Hence, Sathion, Distt. not eligible. Azamgarh, U.P. 49 Uttar Pandit Govind Ballabh Mobile Gomi Khera, Not IR of the State Government and Application-cum-Monitoring Not recommended Pradesh Pant, Institute of Dispensary Gosainganj, specified show the date of commencement of the project as 'New Studies in Rural Lucknow under the proposal'. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs Development, 42, scheme under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be Shivani Vihar, eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have Kalyanpur, Lucknow- been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. 226022 As per the Registration Certificate enclosed with the proposal, the validity of the registration of the Organisation has expired as it was valid upto 30.01.2012. Audited A/cs for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11 does not show the expenditure incurred by the organisation on the project applied for. Further, there is no reference about the Mobile Dispensary in the Annual Report for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 50 Uttar Patel Viyda Mandir Computer Village/Post The State Government has recommended for Central Not recommended Pradesh Samiti, Village and training Bhudkuda, assistance of Computer Training Centre whereas col. No. 6, Post - Bhudkuda, centre Urdauli, Distt. 18-20 of the inspection report and other documents such as Urdauli, Sitapur Sitapur list of beneficiaries, recognition certificate show that the proposal is for the project of Middle School. Further, Budget found enclosed alongwith the proposal is for Computer Training Centre. Thus there are contradiction in the basic facts. Further, the proposal does not meet the mandatory requirement of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY. Hence, not eligible.

51 Uttar Prabhat Gramodyog Mobile Kasba and Post Not IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Pradesh Seva Sansthan, Dispensary Ramnagar, specified of the project as 01.04.2008 whereas Application-cum- Village Bahoda Khera, Anwala, Distt. under the Monitoring Form does not have any mention of the same. Tehsil - Anwala, Distt. Bareilly, U.P scheme However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the Bareilly, U.P. scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Further, Consolidated Audited A/c of the organisation has also not been submitted with the proposal. Hence, not eligible 52 Uttar Sardar Parel Purv Computer Village and 50 IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Pradesh Madhyamik Vidyalaya training Post of the project as July, 2010 whereas Application-cum- Samiti, Village and centre Barkheriya, Monitoring Form does not have any mention of the same. Post Barkheriya, Kotara Devkali, However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the Kotara Devkali, Sitapur, U.P. scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for Sitapur, U.P. assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Memorandum of Association though has a reference of 'Training Centre' but it does not specifically mandate it to run a Computer Training Centre. Audited A/cs for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11 does not show the expenditure incurred by the organisation on the project applied for. Further, the proposal does not meet the mandatory requirement of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 53 Uttar Seema Sewa Mobile Proposed at Not IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Pradesh Sansthan, 22/158, Dispensary Indira Nagar specified of the project as 'New Project' whereas as per Application- Indira Nagar, Lucknow, Area, Lucknow, under the cum-Monitoring, the same is mentioned as '2011-12'. U.P. U.P. scheme However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. It is no where established in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Audited A/cs for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11 do not show the expenditure incurred by the organisation on the project applied for. Further, there is no reference about the functioning of Mobile Dispensary in the Annual Reports for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11.Hence, not eligible.

54 Uttar Shankar Jan Kalyan Ten Bedded Kasba - Not There is some inconsistency in the accomodation available Not recommended Pradesh Shiksha Samiti, Village Hospital Kubargoun, specified for the project as shown in the rent agreement and and Post - Ramnagar, Tehseil Sadar, under the inspection report of the State Government. Consolidated Tehsil - Anwala, Distt. Distt. Badayun, scheme Audited A/c of the organisation in four parts containing Bareilly, U.P. U.P. Income and Expenditure statement, Receipt and Payment statement, Balance Sheet and Auditors Report are not submitted alongwith the proposal. Hence, not eligible.

55 Uttar Shashwat Vikas Ten Bedded 309, Not IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Pradesh Samiti, K-885, Hospital Aurangabad specified of the project as 2010-11 whereas as per Application-cum- Ashiyana Colony, Jageer, Kanpur- under the Monitoring, the same is mentioned as 'Proposed'. However, Lucknow - 226012, Raibareilly scheme the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme U.P. Highway, inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, Shaheed Path, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working Lucknow, U.P. in its sector for a period of two years. Audited A/cs for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11 does not show the expenditure incurred by the organisation on the project applied for. Further, there is no reference about the ten-bedded hospital in the Annual Report for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 56 Uttar Shashwat Vikas Mobile 309, Not IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Pradesh Samiti, K-885, Dispensary Aurangabad specified of the project as '(2010-11) Proposed Scheme' whereas as Ashiyana Colony, Jageer, Kanpur- under the per Application-cum-Monitoring the same is mentioned as Lucknow - 226012, Raibareilly scheme 'New proposal'. However, the guidelines for assisting the U.P. Highway, NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to Shaheed Path, be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should Lucknow, U.P. have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Audited A/cs for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11 do not show the expenditure incurred by the organisation on the project applied for. Further, there is no reference about the functioning of Mobile Dispensary in the Annual Reports for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11. Hence, not eligible.

57 Uttar Swargiya Shri Babu Mobile Adarsh Nagar, Not IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Pradesh Singh Shiksha Samiti, Dispensary Shanti Nagar specified of the project as '13.07.2010' whereas as per Application- Adarsh Nagar, Shanti Road, Kali under the cum-Monitoring, the same is mentioned as 'New project'. As Nagar Road, Kali Mandir, Etah, scheme such there is a contradiction in the date of commencement Mandir, Etah, U.P. U.P. of the project. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. No list of beneficiaries are available with the proposal. it is no where established in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Audited A/cs for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11 does not show the expenditure incurred by the organisation on the project applied for. Further, there is no reference about the functioning of Mobile Dispensary in the Annual Report for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 58 Uttar Vindhya Shiksha Seva Craft proposed IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Pradesh Sansthan, Village Training scheme of the project as 'N.A. (Proposed Scheme)' whereas as per Hawat Mau Mawia, centre Application-cum-Monitoring, the same is mentioned as 'After R.B.L. Road, Lucknow, sanction of grant'. However, the guidelines for assisting the U.P. NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Audited A/cs for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11 does not show the expenditure incurred by the organisation on the project applied for. The Annual Reports for the years 2008-09 to 2010-11 enclosed with the proposal do not indicate any details of the Craft Training Centre purportedly being run by the NGO. Hence, not eligible.

59 Uttar Vindhya Shiksha Seva Computer proposed at IR of the State Government shows date of commencement Not recommended Pradesh Sansthan, Village training 171 KA/1A of the project as 'New project' whereas as per Application- Hawatmaymavya, centre Indrpuri Colony, cum-Monitoring Form, the same is mentioned as 'After R.B.L. Road, Lucknow, Hawat Mau sanction of the grant. However, the guidelines for assisting U.P. Mawia, Near the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order PGI, RBL to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should Road, Lucknow, have been actively working in its sector for a period of two U.P. years. Further, the proposal does not meet the mandatory requirement of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY. Further, there is no reference about the Computer Training Centre in the Annual Report for the year 2009-09 to 2010-11. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 60 Maharashtra Shri Sant Sjiromani Hostel Late Babaraoji 100 Inspection Report (IR) of the State Government is xerox copy. IR Not recommended Manmath Swami (Secondary) Dhonde Central of the State Government shows date of commencement of the Shikshan Prasarak S.C. Hostel at project as '14.06.2010' whereas as per Application-cum- Mandal, Shewdi (Ba.) Shewdi (Ba.) Monitoring Form, the same is mentioned as '10.06.2005'. As per Tq. Loha, Distt. Tq. Loha, Distt. the IR the location of the project is Late Babaraoji Dhonde Central S.C. Hostel at Shewdi (Ba.) Tq. Loha, Distt. Nanded Nanded, Maharashtra Nanded, whereas as per Application-cum-Monitoring Form, it is shown as Maharashtra Late Babaraoji Dhonde Central S.C. Primary Residential School at Shewdi (Ba.) Tq. Loha, Distt. Nanded. Thus there is a contradiction. Further, the rent agreement shows that the possession of the building to run the said project has been taken on rent from the day of 01.04.2011. So, there is inconsistency in the commencement of the project. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Accounts in four parts of the project for which grant in aid is sought containing Income and Expenditure statement, Receipt and Payment statement, Balance Sheet and Auditors Report are not submitted alongwith the proposal. Hence, not eligible.

(M.B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member