Minutes of the Meeting of the Screening Committee meeting held on 30 th August, 2011 for scrutiny/recommending of new cases under the scheme of grant in aid to Voluntary Organizations working for Scheduled Castes.

1. The screening committee meeting was held on 30 th Aaugust, 2011 under the chairmanship of Shri Sanjeev Kumar, Joint Secretary (SCD). The two non-official members of the Committee present were (i) Shri M.B. Deshmukh, Secretary, Servants of Society and (ii) Dr. Bezwada Wilson, Convenor, Safai Karmachari Andolan.

2. At the outset, the Committee was informed about the budget allocation for 2011-12 under the scheme, notional allocation fixed for the States/UTs within the budgetary outlay, committed liability for funding existing ongoing projects, number of proposals already recommended by the Screening Committee during 2009-10 and 2010-11 but grants are yet to be released and number of proposals received during 2011-12. In this connection, the Committee was informed that as per the policy decision in the Ministry’s Office Order No.1- 31/2006-Cdn., dated 05.09.2008 and 23.02.2009, recommendations of the State GIA Committee for new projects would remain valid for the financial year following the year in which they were received and recommendations of the Screening Committee within the Ministry would also remain valid for one year following the year in which they are recommended. The Committee was also informed that as per the Scheme, recommendations of State/UT Grants-in- Aid Committee along with inspection reports for the current year are required each and every year for releasing of grant to any project proposal under the Scheme.

3. The committee adopted the following parameters for selection of new cases during the year 2011-12:-

(i) Mandatory Recognition of the schools under the relevant statute.

(ii) As per this Ministry’s O.M. No.62-01/2007-cdn dated 27.09.2007, top priority to be given to the projects of schools. Priority for other projects are to be decided by the Committee.

(iii) Computer education projects should be recognized by DOEACC/Universities/Accreditation bodies.

(iv) School projects to be considered only where the SC rural female literacy level of the District is not more than 30% as per 2001 census, alternatively such projects in districts where SC female literacy rate is less than that of State level.

(v) Not more than 2 similar projects are to be allowed in the same district;

(vi) As a pre-requisite, Proposals are essentially required to be recommended by the State GIA Committee.

(vii) The project related to control of Blindness should be considered by the Disability Division in the Ministry or Deptt. of Health, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare.

(viii) In case of projects namely Ten Bedded/Mobile Dispensary the medical/Para medical staff engaged by the Organisation should essentially have the requisite Professional qualification and furnish attested photocopies thereof, besides NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE to run it from competent medical authority in the State.

(ix) Intra state priorities taken into consideration SCs population of the State concerned.

(x) Availability of fund allocated under the scheme

(xi) The rejected cases to be returned to the State Govt. concerned.

4. As per general guidelines for assisting Non-Governmental Organizations/Voluntary Organizations, “in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organization should have been registered for a period of at least 2 years and should have been actively working in its sector for a period of 2 years. Such projects will not be taken up for assistance where the activities are proposed to commence after the project is sanctioned and funds released by the Ministry.” The NGO should also fulfill other conditions required under the scheme as per checklist prescribed in this regard.

5. The Committee has taken into account the prevailing status of performance in the existing scheme and financial availability for undertaking new projects. While doing so the committee may take note of the fact that the Ministry has already been funding around 600 projects through 400 NGOs spread out in the country.

5. It is evident from the releases for the years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 that some States have been receiving substantial shares of the total grant-in-aid released under the Scheme disproportionate their SC population percentage. These States are , Assam, , , , Manipur, Rajasthan & Orissa. In some States namely, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Tripura & Uttaranchal, grant-in-aid share moderately exceed their SC population percentage. Other states namely Bihar, Chhattisgarh, , Jharkhand, Kerala, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh & West Bengal receive proportionately less grant-in-aid in relation to their SC population percentage.

6. In this meeting, 38 new cases screened and 6 cases those considered in the previous meeting reviewed consequent upon submission of further clarifications/documents by the NGOs, after deliberation at length and decision thereon has been incorporated in the Annexure attached to these minutes.

(M.B. Deshmukh ) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson ) Member Member

(Sanjeev Kumar) Chairman of the Screening Committee REVIEW OF 6 CASES SCREENED BY THE SCREENING COMMITTEE IN ITS MEETING HELD ON 30TH AUGUST, 2011 CONSEQUENT UPON SUBMISSION OF FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS/DOCUMENTS BY THE NGOs S. Name of Name of the Project Location District No. of Recommen Observation of Screening Recommendation of the Committee during its No. the State organisation Applied for of the Benefic dation of Committee in its meeting held meeting held on 30th August, 2011. with complete Project iaries Screening during previous meetings address Committee

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 Tripura Sri Krishna Reseidential Sri Krishna Tripura 100 Not The recognition certificate, which is a NGO has represented they are in possession of Mission School Mission (W) recommend pre-requisite, is not found enclosed recognition certificate since there was no requirement Institute, new Institute, ed with the proposal. Hence, not eligible. of attaching the same with the proposal, they did not Gokul, new Gokul, (Refer : minutes of the Screening submit. However, they are now submitting a copy of recognition certificate. Sonatala, Sonatala, Committee Meeting dated 9 & The Committee observed that Director of Bamutia, West Bamutia, 10.07.2010 at S.No.284) School Education, Tripura has returned their Tripura West application dated 23-02-2010 regarding recognition Tripura of school vide their letter No.1-62/S/GI-I/2009 dated 09-07-2010. Further NGO has not specified whether the grant has been asked for Primary School or, Secondary School as schematic financial norms are different in regard to these two projects. Shri Prakash Chandra Das, General Secretary and Chairman, S/C Department, Tripura Pradesh Congress Committee, Tripura has already been requested to advise the NGO to forward a fresh proposal complete in all respects after obtaining the recognition of School from the competent authorities. Proposal can be however, considered after reciept of complete proposal for the current year from the State Government.

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 2 Bihar Dishayen, Vocational Baghvaa Bhojpur 100 Not Memorandum of Association of the NGO vide letter dated 25.05.2011 has submitted a copy Baghvaa Gali, Training Gali, Golla recommend Organisation has not been found of Memoreandum of Association of the organisation Golla Mohalla,Arr ed enclosed with the proposal. The and enclosed a copy of Government of Bihar letter Mohalla,Arrah, ah, Bhojpur inspection report of March, 2010 is not dated 18.11.2006, duly stamped of the NGO, which has permitted the NGO to impart training under Electronic Bhojpur in orginal. The proposal does not Stream (i) Radio Technoilogy (ii) TV Technology (iii) mention the specific type of vocational Tape Recorder, CD and VCD Technology and (2) under training to be imparted. (Refer : Electric stream (i) House hiring (ii) Electricla application minutes of the Screening Committee Technology (iii) Welding Technoilogy (iv) Cutting and Meeting dated 13 & 14.05.2011 at Tailoring to unemployed people with condition that S.No.5) every three months an inspection report would be made available to the Udyog Deptt. of Bihar by the organisation. Even now no original inspection report is available, this case may be reconsidered, if the Bihar Government recommends it for current year with all necessary documents. Bihar Government may consider forwarding separate proposals for each projects within the framework of the scheme. 3 Jammu & Kristu Jyoti Computer NH/1A, Samba 30 Not IR shows the date of commencement of NGO vide letter dated 17.06.2011 has Kashmir Social Welfare Training Diani recommend the project as "as soon as the grant is represented that 90% trainees are from SC Society, NH/1A, Center samba ed recieved". The guidelines for assisting the community mostly from BPL Households. They Diani, Samba NGOs under the scheme inter-alia have submitted list of 35 beneficiaries for the year provides that in order to be eligible for Distt., J&K- 2010-11, Accreditation Certificate dated assistance, a voluntary organisation 184121 should have been actively working in its 09.05.2007 & 11.02.2011 of NIOS-Ministry of sector for a period of two years. In the IR, Human Resource and Development. Copy of the number of beneficiaries found present attendance sheet w.e.f. 2007 to 2010 is enclosed. at the time of inspection has not been The Committee recommended. The shown. The list of beneficiaries has not State Government may be requested to submit been given alongwith the proposal. the complete proposal for the current Further, it has no where been shown in financial year. the proposal that the project is providing coverage to atleaset 60% SC beneficiaries as stipulated in para 2.2(g) of the scheme which is a mandatory condition. The proposal does not meet the mandatory requirement of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY.Hence, not eligible. (Refer : minutes of the Screening Committee Meeting dated 9 & 10.07.2010 at S.No.262)

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 4 Jammu Kristu Jyoti Mobile NH/1A, Samba Not Not The inspection report does not show the NGO vide letter dated 17.06.2011 has and Social Welfare Dispensary Diani, applicab recommend date of commencement of the project, represented that 98% beneficiaries are from SC Kashmir Society, Samba le ed rather it has been reflected as a fresh community mostly from BPL Households. They NH/1A, Diani, Distt. J&K- proposal. General guidelines for assisting have submitted list of beneficiaries of previous NGOs inter-alia state that “such projects Samba Distt. 184121 years attested by Sarpanches of panchayats will not be taken up for assistance where J&K-184121 the activities are proposed to commence certifying that the beneficiaries belong to SC after the project is sanctioned and funds community. Letters from the BMO, Sub-District released by the Ministry”. Further, it is no hospital authorities appointing the Government where established in the proposal that the Doctors for the Mobile Clinic since 1996 to 2001. Organisation is catering to atleast 60% The Committee recommended. The SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory State Government may be requested to submit requirement under para 2.2(g) of the the complete proposal for the current scheme. (Refer : minutes of the financial year. Screening Committee Meeting dated 13 & 14.05.2011 at S.No.6)

5 Uttar Samaj Non- 755, Indira Muzaffa 100 Not The female literacy rate in Distt. NGO vide its letter forwarded by Shri Kadir Rana, Pradesh Kalyankari Residential Colony, r Nagar recommend Muzaffar Nagar is 37.03% as per M.P., Muzaffarnagar, U.P. has represented that Sarswati Primary Muzaffar ed census 2001, which is higher than the though literacy rate in Uttar Pradesh is good but Sabha,755, School Nagar prescribed norms under the guidelines condition of SC in the field of education is not Indira Colony, as 30%. Further, Recognition good enough in the State. SC female literacy in Muzaffar Nagar certification for the School has been Muzaffarnagar District is 37.03 and the same is granted on temporary basis. Hence, 30.5% in Uttar Pradesh. not eligible. (Refer : minutes of the The Committee felt that the request of Screening Committee Meeting dated the Hon'ble M.P. may be considered by 13 & 14.05.2011 at S.No.96) Ministry on merit.

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 6 Uttar Nalanda Vikas Non- Sunehra, Bulands 96 Not Memorandum of Association of the The organisation has represented vide letter dated Pradesh Shiksha Samiti, Residential GTRoad, hahr recommend Organisation does not mandate running of 25.08.2011 against the decision of the Screening LIG, 495 Avas School Bulandsha ed a Non-Residential School. Govt. of UP Committee and argued that the organisation was Vikas, hr has recommended for non-residential mandated to run the school by resolution passed primary school whereas IR indicates Bulandshahr by the Samiti. A temporary recognition certificate beneficiaries from class VI to VII and temporary recognition certificate is also of the school is treated as permanent certificate in for class VI to VII. There are only five Uttar Pradesh. In regard to literacy rate rooms for 100 students for Residence as submission is that it is 38% as per Statistics well as for running classes. The Audited Department. The accomodation available for the accounts for the year 2008-09 & 2009-10 students studying in the are as per prescribed is not reflecting the activity of running of a standard norms. Non-Residential Primary School. The As per the communication the annual report submitted is the combined organisation has enclosed certain documents report for the year 2007-2010. In the report there is no detail of the working of like Auduited Balance Sheet for the previous 4 the school. The female literacy rate in yeras, resolution passed by the NGO etc., Distt. Bulandshahr is 31.73% as per which are not recieved. The case may be census 2001, which is higher than the submitted for a review when all the documents prescribed norms under the guidelines as are available. 30%. Hence, not eligible. (Refer : minutes of the Screening Committee Meeting dated 13 & 14.05.2011 at S.No.91)

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member MINUTES IN REGARD TO NEW PROPOSALS RECEIVED FROM THE STATE GOVERNMENTS UNDER THE SCHEME OF 'GRANTS-IN-AID TO VOLUNTARY ORGANISATIONS WORKING FOR SCHEDULED CASTES' CONSIDERED BY THE SCREENING COMMITTEE IN ITS MEETINGS HELD ON 30.08.2011 S. Name of the Name of the Project Location of the District No. of Comments Recommendation No. State Organization with applied for Project beneficia of the Screening complete address ries Committee

1 Uttar Pradesh Bhartiya Audogik Ten-Bedded Mo. Umarpur, Jaunpur Not The inspection report shows the date of Not recommended Shansthan Mo. Hospital Haribandhanpur, specified commencement of the project as “2010" Umarpur, Machchli Sahar whereas in the Application-cum-Monitoring Haribandhanpur, Road, Jaunpur Form it has been shown as “N.A./N.P.". Machchli Sahar Road, However, the guidelines for assisting the Jaunpur NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Further, it is no where established in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Hence, not eligible. 2 Uttar Pradesh Kasturba Gramin Mobile Near Fatims Mau Not The inspection report shows the date of Not recommended Mahila Sewa Dispensary Hospital, Imilliya, specified commencement of the project as “New Sansthan, Mohali- Mau proposal" whereas in the Application-cum- Imilliya, Distt.- Mau Monitoring Form it has been shown as “N.A.". However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter- alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Further, it is no where established in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Hence, not eligible.

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 3 Uttar Pradesh Drishti-The Vision, Non- H/o Muktinath Maharajga 100 The inspection report does not show any Not recommended 233 B, Basharatpur Residential Dwivedi, S/o nj date of commencement of the project East, Arogya Mandir, School Ramsubhag, Vill.- whereas in the Application-cum-Monitoring Gorakhpur Pipra Kalyan, Post- Form it has been shown as “Proposed". Khajuria, However, the guidelines for assisting the Mithoora, NGOs under the scheme inter-alia Maharajganj provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Further, para 6. (c) of the inspection report says that the school is not recognised by the State Government, which is a pre-requisite. Hence, not eligible.

4 Uttar Pradesh Ravindranath Tagore Non- Suman Mordern Sitapur 161 The inspection report shows the date of Not recommended Gramothan Evam Residential School, Adarsh commencement of the project as Shiksha Prasar School Nagar, Sec-2, “01.07.2008" whereas in the Application- Sansthan, Plot No-1, Naipalapur, cum-Monitoring Form it has been shown as Hanumant Nagar, Sitapur “Proposed for 2010-11". So, there is a Triveni Nagar-III, Near- contradiction in the date of commencement Newton Public of the project. However, the guidelines for School, Sitapur Road, assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter- Lucknow alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Further, para 6. (c) of the inspection report says that the school is not recognised by the State Government, which is a pre-requisite. Hence, not eligible.

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 5 Uttar Pradesh Akhil Bharat Computer B-35, Rajajipuram, Lucknow 30 The inspection report shows the date of Not recommended Vikas Parishad, B-35, Training Lucknow-226017 commencement of the project as Rajajipuram, Lucknow- Centre for (U.P.) “Proposed. 2011" whereas in the 226017 (U.P.) SC/ST Application-cum-Monitoring Form it has been shown as “From the date of sanction and release of fund". However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Hence, not eligible.

6 Uttar Pradesh Pragya Public Non- At and Post-Lohra Azamgarh 471 The Inspection report by District welfare Not recommended Prathmic Vidyalay, Vill Residential Tah-Burhanpur, Officer, Azamgarh shows that out of total & Post-Lohra, Tah- School Siksha Kshetra & 433 students found on the occasion only Burhanpur, Distt. Block Atraulia 105 belong to SCs. However, no list of Azamgarh Dist.-Azamgarh, beneficiaries has been enclosed with the U.P. proposal. Further, the recognition certificate of the school is temporary. Hence, not eligible.

7 Uttar Pradesh Sita Smarak Viklang Residential Gram Ledoura Azamgarh 156 The application-cum-monitoring form duly Not recommended Shikshan Seva School Post-Gahaji, Tah- filled in prescribed format is not enclosed Sansthan, Gram Budahanpur, Distt. with the proposal. Hence, not eligible. Ledoura Post-Gahaji, Azamgarh Tah-Budahanpur, Distt. Azamgarh

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 8 Uttar Pradesh Soni Jan Kalyan Mobile Village Sugnamau Azamgarh Not The inspection report shows the date of Not recommended Samiti, 43/2, Sector- Dispensary and Sruuounding specified commencement of the project as 10, Indiranagar, LKO- villages, Char “Proposed. 2011" whereas in the 16 Bagh Station Application-cum-Monitoring Form it has Badshah Nagar been shown as “New". However, the Station/Kesar guidelines for assisting the NGOs under Bagh Bus Stand the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Hence, not eligible.

9 Assam South Borband Gram Computer N.S. Road, Hailakandi 30 the proposal does not meet the mandatory Not recommended Unnayan Samiti, P.O. Training Hailakandi Town requirement of being recognized by Borbond, Hailakandi Centre for P.O.-Hailakandi, DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION District, Assam SCs Dist. Hailakandi BODY. Hence, not eligible. Pin-788151

10 Assam Pathari Vocational Vocational W-08, Bazar North 50 As per the Registration Certificate Not recommended Institute, Near Court Training Road, Dist. North Lakhimpur enclosed with the proposal, registration of Campus, Nagaon, Centre Lakhimpur, Assam the organisation is already expired as it Assam was valid upto 15.05.2011 only. Further, under the nomenclature of vocational Training Center, the organisation has applied for number of trades. Out of the project applied for, only computer center is covered under the scheme. But the proposal does not meet the pre-requisite requirement of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY. Hence, not eligible.

11 Assam Assam Scheduled Awareness Golaghat, Jorhat, Guwahat 250 per Inspection Report of the State Government Not recommended Caste Workers Camps Sivasagar, day is not enclosed with the proposal. Further, Council, RGB Road, Dibrugarh, the project being undertaken by the Shree Nagar House Lakhimpur and organisation is also not covered under the No. 1, Bylane-4, Dhemaji, Assam specified projects of the scheme. Hence, (M. B. Deshmukh) Guwahati- 781005, (Sanjeev Kumar) not eligible. (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Assam Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 12 Assam Adarsha Samaj Computer Dergaon, Golaghat 30 The inspection report shows the date of Not recommended Kalyan Samiti, Village Training Golaghat District, commencement of the project as Beloguri, Natun Centre Assam “01.04.2011" whereas in the Application- Bazar, P.O. Solmari, cum-Monitoring Form it has been shown as Nagaon, Pin-782002, “01.04.2010". So, there is a contradiction in Assam the date of commencement of the project. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Further, the proposal does not meet the mandatory requirement of being recognized by DOEACC/ UNIVERSITY/ ACCREDITION BODY. Hence, not eligible.

13 Assam Jaluguti Agragami Non- At Bhurbandha, Moregaon 100 Only two classes(class I and II) are run by Not recommended Mahila Samiti, Village Residential P.O. Bhurbandha, the organisation. Under para 20(b) (i) of & P.O. Jaluguti, C.D. Primary Moregaon- the IR, the inspecting authority has Block, Kapali, District School 782104, Assam mentioned that nobody has passed out of Moregaon-782104, the institution successfully. Assam The SC female literacy rate in Distt. Moregaon is 48.56% as per census 2001, which is higher than the prescribed norms under the guidelines as 30%. Hence, not eligible. 14 Maharashtra Dyandeep Janakalyan Ten-Bedded Sai Hospital, Pune 600 The Inspection Report of the State Not recommended Foundation, 407 Hospital Janata Vasahat, Government in respect of the project under Shukrawar Peth, Near Maruti reference is not available with the Shivaji Road, Pune- Mandir, Parvati, proposal. As per the list of beneficiaries 411002 Pune enclosed with the proposal, the organisation is not catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Hence, not eligible

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 15 Maharashtra Indira Mahila Mobile At Post Navapur, Nandurbar Not In the I.R, inspecting authority under para Not recommended Balkalyan & Apang Dispensary District Nandurbar specified 7(b) has mentioned that no such Punarvasan Vikas programme is run by any other NGo in the Mandal, Navapur, district whereas in Nandurbar District, one District Nandurbar mobile dispensary is already under operation by Gram Vikas Bahuudeshiya Sanstha, Nandurbar with the financial assistance of this Ministry. The proposal does not contain the requisite qualification certificates of medical/para-medical staffs. Hence, not eligible.

16 Maharashtra Vithai Bahuuddeshiya Ten-Bedded Siddharth Clinic, Osmanaba Not Annual Reports for the last three years Not recommended Savabhavi Sanstha, Hospital C/o Ramrao N. d specified from 2008-09 to 2010-11 is merely C/o Dr. Vinod Swami, Gaikwad reproduction of contents. It does not give Swami Hospital Vdyanagar any details of the working of Ten Bedded Opposite Collector Osmanabad, Tq. Hospital such as number of patients Officer, Latur, Tq. & & Distt. admitted each year etc. are missing. Distt. Latur Osmanabad Hence, not eligible.

17 Maharashtra Swamy Vivekanand Ten-Bedded Annapurna Sc Washim Not NOC for running Ten Bedded Hospital, Not recommended Shikshan Prasarak Hospital Ten Bedded specified issued by District Health Officer, Washim is Mandal, Ambika Hospital, Rajgaon the photocopy one and is not authenticated Talkies Road, Hingoli Tq. Distt. Washim by any authorised signatory of the organisation. The proposal does not contain the requisite qualification certificates of medical/para-medical staffs. Further, it is no where established in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Hence, not eligible.

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 18 Maharashtra Late Wasram Naik Ten-Bedded Karla Dev Tq. Yavatmal Not The inspection report shows the date of Not recommended Bahuuddeshiya Hospital Pusaid Tq. Pusad, specified commencement of the project as Magaswargiya District Yavatmal “14.03.2002" whereas the Application-cum- Aroggya Seva & Monitoring Form does not have date of Education Institute, commencement of the project. Annual Shelgaon, Tq. Barshi, Report for only one year is available i.e. for Takali, Akola 2009-10 against the same required for the last two years. The activity of running Ten Bedded Hospital does not find place in the annual report for 2009-10. As per the guidelines the number of similar projects in a district should not exceed two. Whereas in the district "Yavatmal" of Maharashtra three projects of ten bedded hospital are already being funded under the scheme which are being run by i) Insaf-e-Sariyat Welfare Bahuudeshiya Sanstha, ii) Help Bahuudeshiya and iii) Samta Gram Vikas Bahuudeshiya Sanstha.Hence, not eligible

19 Maharashtra Shivshkti Pratishthan, Ten-Bedded A/p. Mehergaon Dhule Not No expenditure incurred on the Ten Not recommended Mehergaon, Tah. & Hospital Tal. & Distt.-Dhule specified Bedded Hospital as per audited a/c for Distt.- Dhule 2008-09 to 2010-11. As per II.R and Application-cum Monitoring Form, the date of commencement of the project is 01.05.2006 whereas annual reports for 2008-09 and 2009-10 does not substantiate this facts. Thus there is contradiction in date of commencement of project. The proposal does not contain the requisite qualification certificates of medical/para-medical staffs. Hence, not eligible.

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 20 Maharashtra Shrikrishna Mahila Ten-Bedded Aanan Clinic, Not As per the guidelines the number of similar Not recommended Bal Kalyan & Apang Hospital Pankaj Nagar, specified projects in a district should not exceed two. Punarvasan Vikas , District Whereas in the district "Jalgaon" of Mandal, Ghodgaon Jalgaon Maharashtra two projects of Ten Bedded Tal Chopda, District hospital are already approved under the Jalgaon scheme which is being run by i) Kranti Jyoti Savitribai Phule Mahila Vikas Bahuudeshiya Sanstha, Plot No.28, Gatt No. 41/3, Droupati Nagar, Nr. Gajanan Marbal, Jalgaon ii) Shri Mahila Bal Kalyan Apang Punarvas Vikas Mandal, Trimurti Chowk, Bazar Peth, Kasare, Tq. Sakri, Distt. Dhule. Hence, not eligible.

21 Maharashtra Sharda Bahuudeshiya Ten-Bedded At- Khapary, Ta. Nagpur Not The Inspection Report of the State Not recommended Shikshan Sanstha, Hospital Kalmeshwar, specified Government enclosed with the proposal is Adhari Niwas wd No. Nagpur a photocopy. Further, the inspection report 1, Ta. Kulmeshwar, show the date of commencement of the Nagpur project as “New Proposal" whereas in the Application-cum-Monitoring Form it has been shown as “From the date of sanction". However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter- alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Further, it is no where established in the proposal that the Organisation is catering to atleast 60% SC beneficiaries, which is a mandatory requirement under para 2.2(g) of the scheme. Hence, not eligible.

22 Maharashtra Matoshri Saraswati Mobile At post- Dhule Not Memorandum of Association does not Not recommended Mahila Mandal, Dispensary Dhandane, Tal. specified mandate the organization to run Mobile Mehergaon, Tal.& Sakri, Distt. Dhule Dispensary. Hence, not eligible. Distt. Dhule

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 23 Maharashtra Satyamev Jayate Mobile At Indira Nagar, Nagpur Not The Inspection Report of the State Not recommended Shikshan Prasarak Dispensary Civil Line, Kuhi, specified Government enclosed with the proposal is Mandal, Jaripatka, Post + Tal. Kuhi, a photocopy. Memorandum of Association District Nagpur District Nagpur does not mandate the organization to run Mobile Dispensary. The activity of running Mobile Dispensary does not find place in the annual report/audited accounts of the organisation. The inspection report and application-cum-monitoring form show the date of commencement of the project as “01.04.2011" The guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Hence, not eligible.

24 Maharashtra Shri Chakradhar Ten-Bedded Smt. Indiraben Gondia Not The Inspection report is not in original. Not recommended Bahuuddeshiya Hospital Hariharbhai Patel specified Hence, proposal can not be considered. Shikshan & Vikas Memorial Hospital Sanstha, Gondia at Mohadi Tah. Goregaon, District - Gondia 25 Maharashtra Jogeshwari Gramin Mobile At- Post Shirpur, Dhule Not Annual Reports for the last two years i.e. Not recommended Vikas Sevabhavi Dispensary Tal. Shirpur Distt. specified 2008-09 and 2009-10 is merely Sanstha, At Post, 20, Dhule reproduction of contents so far as Mobile Pournima Nagar Dispensary is concerned. Audited a/c or Deopur, Dhule, Tal. & the years 2009-10 and 2020-11 it is found Distt. Dhule that the expenditure incurred for Mobile Dispensary is 200182.00 even the break- ups are the same. It casts doubt on the actual functioning of the Mobile Dispensary. The proposal does not contain the requisite qualification certificates of medical/para-medical staffs. Hence, not eligible.

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 26 Maharashtra Priyadarshini Mahila Ten-Bedded Dr. Shrikant Gondia Not Recommended & Balvikas Mandal, Hospital Jichkar Memorial specified Gondia, Tah. Gondia, Hospital at District Gondia Khajari, Tah. Sadak/Arjuni, District Gondia 27 Maharashtra Ashirwad Shaikshanik Ten-Bedded Udaygiri Clinic, Latur Not As per I.R., the date of commencement of Not recommended & Samajik Sanstha Hospital C/o Mr. Ganpat N. specified the project is 01.06.2009 whereas no C/o Shridhar Gade, Munde, Nanded expenditure has been incurred on Ten Khadgaon Road, Road, Malkapur Bedded Hospital at Latur for which the Latur, Tal. & Distt. Tq. Udgir, Distt. organisation has applied for seeking grant Latur Latur from Ministry. Annual Reports for the last two years i.e 2009-10 and 2010-11 is exact reproduction of contents. This cast doubt on the authenticity of the functioning of Ten Bedded Hospital. Hence, not eligible.

28 Maharashtra Shri Satya Sai Mobile At post Jalgaon Not Annual Reports for the last two years i.e Not recommended Sanskarutik Samajik Dispensary Malharpura, specified 2009-10 and 2010-11 so far as it relates to Shaikshanik Mandal, Chopada Tal. the functioning of Mobile Dispensary is Khedgaon, Tal. Chopada District merely reproduction of contents. It lacks , District Jalgaon information like number of patients treated. Jalgaon The expenditure incurred on both the years on Mobile Dispensary is exactly the same i.e. Rs.196400/-. This cast doubt on the authenticity of the functioning of Mobile Dispensary. Hence, not eligible.

29 Maharashtra Ashirwad Shaikshanik Ten-Bedded Divya Clinic, At Pune Not Annual Reports for the last two years i.e Not recommended & Samajik Sanstha Hospital Chandoli, post specified 2009-10 and 2010-11 is exact reproduction C/o Shridhar Gade, Rajgurunagar, Tq. of contents. It lacks information like Khadgaon Road, Khed, Distt.- Pune number of patients treated. This cast Latur, Tal. & Distt. doubt on the authenticity of the functioning Latur of Ten Bedded Hospital. Hence, not eligible.

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 30 Maharashtra Jogaimata Sanskritik Ten Bedded Navjeevan Clinic, Beed Not the I.R states the date of commencement Not recommended Samajik Shaikshanik Hospital Ambejogai, Tal. specified of the project as 01.06.2008. However, Mandal, Kapadane, Ambejogai, Distt. there is no mention of this project in the Tal. and Distt. Dhule Beed annual report for the year 2008-09. Again in the annual report of 2009-10, the NGO claimed that the project is running for the last three years, which is not corroborated by any other statement. Hence, not eligible.

31 Maharashtra Jay Hanuman Ten-Bedded Village Sarwadi Wardha Not The inspection report shows the date of Not recommended Bahuuddehshiya Hospital Tahsil Karanja specified commencement of the project as Shikshan Sanstha, (GH) Jai “12.04.2010" whereas in the Application- Karla, wardha, Tah. Hanuman cum-Monitoring Form it has been shown as And Distt. Wardha Bahuuddeshiya “01.04.2011". So, there is a contradiction in Shikshan the date of commencement of the project. Sanstha, Civil However, the guidelines for assisting the Line, Behind NGOs under the scheme inter-alia Panchayat Simiti, provides that in order to be eligible for Wardha assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Further, the activity of running Ten Bedded Hospital has not been reflected in the auual reports/audited accounts of the organization.Hence, not eligible.

32 Maharashtra Gramin Mahila Mobile A/P Patansanogi, Nagpur Not Memorandum of Association does not Not recommended Magasvargiya Dispensary Tah. Saoner, specified mandate the organization to run Mobile Bahuuddeshiya Distt. Nagpur Dispensary. Hence, not eligible. Samaj Vikas Sanstha, Bandhu Nagar, Koradi Road, Nagpur

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 33 Maharashtra Gramin Mahila Ten-Bedded A/P Patansanogi, Nagpur Not Memorandum of Association does not Not recommended Magasvargiya Hospital Tah. Saoner, specified mandate the organization to run Ten Bahuuddeshiya Distt. Nagpur Bedded Hospital. Hence, not eligible. Samaj Vikas Sanstha, Bandhu Nagar, Koradi Road, Nagpur

34 Maharashtra Kranti Gram Vikas Mobile At-Post-Kolpimpri, Beed Not Memorandum of Association does not Not recommended Sansthat, At-Post- Dispensary Tq. Dharur, Distt.- specified mandate the organization to run Mobile Kolpimpri, Tq. Dharur, Beed Dispensary. Hence, not eligible. Distt.- Beed

35 Maharashtra Jivan Vikas Mobile Near Sudhakarrao Aurangaba Not Annual Reports for the last two years Not recommended Prathisthan, Gali No. Dispensary Naik High School, d specified indicate that the organisation is running 5, House No.434- Gali No.5, House this project for the last two years. But the 1012, New Hanuman No.434-1012, New activity of running Mobile Dispensary has Nagar, Aurangabad Hanuman Nagar, not been reflected in the audited accounts Aurangabad of the organization. So, there is a contradiction about functioning of the project. In this circumstances, it is difficult to assess the performance of the organisation. Hence, not eligible.

36 Maharashtra Shri Ramkrishna Ten Bedded Gaibhipura, Washim Not The inspection report shows the date of Not recommended Baba Education, Hospital Behind Sadanand specified commencement of the project as Sport and Taikies, Risod, “01.07.2010" whereas in the Application- Multipurpose Society, District- Washim cum-Monitoring Form it has been shown as Risod, Tq.- Risod, “05.05.2010". So, there is a contradiction in District- Washim the date of commencement of the project. Further, the activity of running Ten Bedded Hospital has not been reflected in the audited accounts of the organization. However, the guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for (M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) a period of two years. Hence, not eligible. (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member 37 Maharashtra Shivaji Ten Bedded Annapurna Ten Gondia Not The inspection report shows the date of Not recommended Bahuuddeshiya Hospital Bedded Hospital, specified commencement of the project as “2009- Education Sanstha, At- Post, Tq. 2010" whereas in the Application-cum- Sadak/Arjuni, Distt.- Sadak/Arjuni, Monitoring Form it has been shown as Gondia, Maharashtra Distt.- Gondia. “2010-11". So, there is a contradiction in the date of commencement of the project. The guidelines for assisting the NGOs under the scheme inter-alia provides that in order to be eligible for assistance, a voluntary organisation should have been actively working in its sector for a period of two years. Hence, not eligible.

38 Madhya Samajik Chetna Seva Non- 86, Agarwal Dewas 100 Application-cum-Monitoring Form enclosed Not recommended Pradesh Sangh, Ujjain, 6/7 Residential Nagar, Dewas with the proposal is not in the prescribed Mittileshwar Bhawan, Primary proforma. Annual Report for 2009-10 only Ganeshpura, Mari School is available with the proposal whereas as road, Ujjain-456010 per the scheme the same is required for the last two years. Hence, not eligible.

(M. B. Deshmukh) (Sanjeev Kumar) (Dr. Bezwada Wilson) Member Chairman of the Screening Committee Member