DOCSLIB.ORG

Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar Report No. DODIG-2018-049 U.S. Department of Defense InspectorDECEMBER 21, 2017 General U.S. Military-Occupied Facilities Evaluation – Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY EXCELLENCE INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY EXCELLENCE Mission Our mission is to provide independent, relevant, and timely oversight of the Department of Defense that supports the warfighter; promotes accountability, integrity, and efficiency; advises the Secretary of Defense and Congress; and informs the public. Vision Our vision is to be a model oversight organization in the Federal Government by leading change, speaking truth, and promoting excellence—a diverse organization, working together as one professional team, recognized as leaders in our field. Fraud, Waste, & Abuse HOTLINE Department of Defense dodig.mil/hotline|800.424.9098 For more information about whistleblower protection, please see the inside back cover. U.S. Military-Occupied Facilities Evaluation – Al Udeid ResultsAir Base, Qatar in Brief December 21, 2017 Findings (cont’d) Objective On June 21, 2017, the Commander responded to these concerns and indicated that they were addressed or in the process of Our objective was to evaluate being addressed. See Appendix B for additional information U.S. military-occupied facilities at on the notice of concern and the Commander’s response. Al Udeid Air Base to verify compliance Recommendations with DoD health and safety policies and standards regarding indoor air quality, electrical systems, fire protection systems, We recommend that the Commander, 379th Air and active and inactive fuel systems. Findings Expeditionary Wing: • Conduct a root cause analysis and implement a corrective action plan for all deficiencies identified We found that indoor air quality, electrical in this report. Ensure that facility operations and systems, fire protection systems, and maintenance comply with the Unified Facilities Criteria inactive fuel systems were not being and the National Fire Protection Association standards. maintained in accordance with DoD health Determine the causes of the moisture intrusion into and safety policies and standards. However, occupied facilities. Include an assessment of the fuel we found that the active fuel systems at system pipelines in accordance with the American Al Udeid Air Base were generally maintained Petroleum Institute (API 570) piping inspection code. in accordance with DoD health and safety • Conduct a root cause analysis and implement a policies and standards. corrective action plan to ensure that all construction projects are reviewed for compliance with applicable We identified a total of 253 deficiencies fire protection and fuel systems codes and standards that could affect the health, safety, and before they are accepted by the Government well-being of DoD personnel: 13 related to as complete. indoor air quality, 105 related to electrical Management Comments systems, 49 related to fire protection systems, and 86 related to inactive fuel and Our Response systems. The deficiencies identified during our evaluation resulted from acceptance of new construction that did not comply The Commander, 379th Air Expeditionary Wing (AEW), agreed with DoD health and safety policies and with our findings and recommendations, and has taken action standards, moisture intrusion into facilities, to mitigate and reduce the risks to Government personnel and and inadequate facility maintenance. property. The Commander stated that he had taken steps to identify root causes and correct deficiencies identified in the We considered five of the electrical report. Specifically, he stated that the 379th Expeditionary deficiencies we identified to be critical Civil Engineer Squadron (ECES) had conducted inspections of deficiencies requiring immediate all facilities for the types of electrical deficiencies identified in corrective action and issued a notice the report and had implemented corrective actions, including of concern on June 7, 2017, to the replacing electrical panels, adding protective barriers around Commander, 379th Air Expeditionary Wing. i DODIG-2018-049 (Project No. D2017-D000PT-0103.000) │ U.S. Military-Occupied Facilities Evaluation – Al Udeid ResultsAir Base, Qatar in Brief Management Comments (cont’d) transformers, and purchasing electrical diagnostic Additionally, the Commander did not address the equipment to identify problems. The Commander recommendation to determine the cause of the water further stated that the base operations support intrusion and the poor air quality in the facilities and contractor had updated the status of fire suppression correct the related deficiencies. The Commander stated systems for all facilities and was correcting all that there is no active roof inspection program, but deficiencies. Where timely correction of fire deficiencies he did not confirm that roof infiltration is the only was not possible, the Commander stated that 379 ECES contributor to indoor air quality problems. Therefore, was mitigating the risk. In addition, the Commander these two recommendations are unresolved. We request stated that the command had added the services of a that the Commander, 379 AEW, provide additional fire protection engineer to the base operations support comments on these recommendations within 30 days of contract for the design and execution of construction the issuance of this report. The additional comments projects. Finally, the Commander stated that a contract should address all specific causes of the moisture was awarded to correct the fuel system deficiencies and intrusion and air quality problems in facilities and to bring the system into full compliance with the Unified corrective action plans. In addition, the Commander’s Facilities Criteria by May 2018. comments should address the specific actions planned to ensure that fuel system construction projects are Therefore, four of the six recommendations are resolved reviewed for compliance with applicable fuel systems but remain open. We will close these recommendations standards before the Government accepts them once we verify that the stated corrective actions have as complete. been implemented. Please see the Recommendations Table on the next page. Comments from the Commander, 379 AEW, did not address the recommendation to ensure that all construction projects are reviewed for compliance with applicable fuel systems standards before the Government accepts the systems as complete. ii │ DODIG-2018-049 (Project No. D2017-D000PT-0103.000) Recommendations Table Recommendations Recommendations Recommendations Management Unresolved Resolved Closed A.1, B.1.a, B.1.b, Commander, U.S. Air Forces Central C.1.b and D.1 None and C.1.a Please provide Management Comments by January 14, 2018. Note: The following categories are used to describe agency management’s comments to individual recommendations. • Unresolved – Management has not agreed to implement the recommendation or has not proposed actions that will address the recommendation. • Resolved – Management agreed to implement the recommendation or has proposed actions that will address the underlying finding that generated the recommendation. • Closed – OIG verified that the agreed upon corrective actions were implemented. iii DODIG-2018-049 (Project No. D2017-D000PT-0103.000) │ INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22350-1500 December 21, 2017 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: U.S. Military-Occupied Facilities Evaluation – Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar (Report No. DODIG-2018-049) We are providing this report for review and comment. We found that the active fuel systems at Al Udeid Air Base were generally maintained in accordance with DoD health and safety policies and standards. However, we found that indoor air quality, electrical systems, fire protection systems, and inactive fuel systems were not being maintained in accordance with DoD health and safety policies and standards. We conducted this evaluation in accordance with the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, “Quality Standards for Inspection and Evaluation.” We considered comments from the Commander, 379th Air Expeditionary Wing (379 AEW), when preparing the final report. DoD Instruction 7650.03 requires that recommendations be resolved promptly. Comments from the Commander, 379 AEW, partially addressed the recommendations. Therefore, we request additional comments on Recommendations C.1.b and D.1 by January 14, 2018. Please send a PDF file containing your comments to [email protected]. Copies of your comments must have the actual signature of the authorizing official for your organization. We cannot accept the /Signed/ symbol in place of the actual signature. If you arrange to send classified comments electronically, you must send them over the SECRET Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNET). We appreciate the courtesies extended to the staff. Randolph R. Stone Deputy Inspector General Policy and Oversight v DODIG-2018-049│ Distribution: UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (COMPTROLLER), DEPUTY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR POLICY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (ENERGY, INSTALLATIONS, AND ENVIRONMENT); ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH DIRECTORATE DIRECTOR, COST ASSESSMENT AND PROGRAM EVALUATION DOD PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT OFFICER/DEPUTY CHIEF MANAGEMENT OFFICER UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS COMMANDER, UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND AUDITOR GENERAL OF THE AIR FORCE SECRETARY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Foreign Military Presence in the Horn of Africa Region
    SIPRI Background Paper April 2019 THE FOREIGN MILITARY SUMMARY w The Horn of Africa is PRESENCE IN THE HORN OF undergoing far-reaching changes in its external security AFRICA REGION environment. A wide variety of international security actors— from Europe, the United States, neil melvin the Middle East, the Gulf, and Asia—are currently operating I. Introduction in the region. As a result, the Horn of Africa has experienced The Horn of Africa region has experienced a substantial increase in the a proliferation of foreign number and size of foreign military deployments since 2001, especially in the military bases and a build-up of 1 past decade (see annexes 1 and 2 for an overview). A wide range of regional naval forces. The external and international security actors are currently operating in the Horn and the militarization of the Horn poses foreign military installations include land-based facilities (e.g. bases, ports, major questions for the future airstrips, training camps, semi-permanent facilities and logistics hubs) and security and stability of the naval forces on permanent or regular deployment.2 The most visible aspect region. of this presence is the proliferation of military facilities in littoral areas along This SIPRI Background the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa.3 However, there has also been a build-up Paper is the first of three papers of naval forces, notably around the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, at the entrance to devoted to the new external the Red Sea and in the Gulf of Aden. security politics of the Horn of This SIPRI Background Paper maps the foreign military presence in the Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • US Military Policy in the Middle East an Appraisal US Military Policy in the Middle East: an Appraisal
    Research Paper Micah Zenko US and Americas Programme | October 2018 US Military Policy in the Middle East An Appraisal US Military Policy in the Middle East: An Appraisal Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 Domestic Academic and Political Debates 7 3 Enduring and Current Presence 11 4 Security Cooperation: Training, Advice and Weapons Sales 21 5 Military Policy Objectives in the Middle East 27 Conclusion 31 About the Author 33 Acknowledgments 34 1 | Chatham House US Military Policy in the Middle East: An Appraisal Summary • Despite significant financial expenditure and thousands of lives lost, the American military presence in the Middle East retains bipartisan US support and incurs remarkably little oversight or public debate. Key US activities in the region consist of weapons sales to allied governments, military-to-military training programmes, counterterrorism operations and long-term troop deployments. • The US military presence in the Middle East is the culmination of a common bargain with Middle Eastern governments: security cooperation and military assistance in exchange for US access to military bases in the region. As a result, the US has substantial influence in the Middle East and can project military power quickly. However, working with partners whose interests sometimes conflict with one another has occasionally harmed long-term US objectives. • Since 1980, when President Carter remarked that outside intervention in the interests of the US in the Middle East would be ‘repelled by any means necessary’, the US has maintained a permanent and significant military presence in the region. • Two main schools of thought – ‘offshore balancing’ and ‘forward engagement’ – characterize the debate over the US presence in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Naval Aviation November 2014
    The Evolving Future for Naval Aviation By Robbin Laird and Ed Timperlake Second Line of Defense November 2014 http://www.sldinfo.com h The Evolving Future of Naval Aviation 1 Table of Contents LESSONS LEARNED AT FALLON: THE USN TRAINS FOR FORWARD LEANING STRIKE INTEGRATION .......................................................................................................................... 2 REAR ADMIRAL MANAZIR, DIRECTOR OF AIR WARFARE (OPNAV N98) ..................................... 7 THE ROLE OF LIVE VIRTUAL TRAINING ................................................................................................. 8 THE IMPACT OF 5TH GEN ON FIGHTING IN THE EXPANDED BATTLESPACE .................................................. 12 RE-THINKING THE SEA BASE ............................................................................................................ 13 THE CARRIER AND JOINT AND COALITION OPERATIONS: SHAPING INVESTMENTS FOR THE FUTURE ............... 14 VICE ADMIRAL WILLIAM MORAN, DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS, (N1), FORMER DIRECTOR OF AIR WARFARE (OPNAV N98) ............................................................................. 15 THE TRANSITION ............................................................................................................................ 15 SHAPING INNOVATION .................................................................................................................... 16 THE COMING OF THE F-35 .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lead IG for Overseas Contingency Operations
    LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS OCTOBER 1, 2016‒DECEMBER 31, 2016 LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL MISSION The Lead Inspector General for Overseas Contingency Operations will coordinate among the Inspectors General specified under the law to: • develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight over all aspects of the contingency operation • ensure independent and effective oversight of all programs and operations of the federal government in support of the contingency operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, and investigations • promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness and prevent, detect, and deter fraud, waste, and abuse • perform analyses to ascertain the accuracy of information provided by federal agencies relating to obligations and expenditures, costs of programs and projects, accountability of funds, and the award and execution of major contracts, grants, and agreements • report quarterly and biannually to the Congress and the public on the contingency operation and activities of the Lead Inspector General (Pursuant to sections 2, 4, and 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978) FOREWORD We are pleased to publish the Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) quarterly report on Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR). This is our eighth quarterly report on the overseas contingency operation (OCO), discharging our individual and collective agency oversight responsibilities pursuant to sections 2, 4, and 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978. OIR is dedicated to countering the terrorist threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in Iraq, Syria, the region, and the broader international community. The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • EAST of SUEZ, WEST from HELMAND: BRITISH EXPEDITIONARY FORCE and the NEXT SDSR Richard Reeve
    Oxford Research Group | December 2014 Oxford Research Group Briefing – December 2014 EAST OF SUEZ, WEST FROM HELMAND: BRITISH EXPEDITIONARY FORCE AND THE NEXT SDSR Richard Reeve The formal signature on 5 December of a new defence cooperation agreement between the UK and Bahrain, including the formalisation of a ‘permanent’ Royal Navy forward operating base in Manama, is the latest step in the current UK Government’s plans to reconsolidate a military presence in the Persian Gulf. Of little significance in itself, the upgraded Bahrain naval base and the timing of its announcement are important reflections of British strategic thinking in the context of withdrawal from Afghanistan, intervention in the messy ideological and proxy wars of the wider Middle East, and the looming Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR), due after the May 2015 election. East of Suez The UK’s security relationship with Bahrain is not new. A British protectorate, along with all the other southern Gulf emirates, for a century up to 1971, the UK only scaled back its naval and air bases there in its post-1967 withdrawal from ‘East of Suez’. Since 1980, when the Iran-Iraq war occasioned the deployment of the Armilla Patrol to protect friendly (oil) shipping, the Royal Navy has continuously had at least one frigate or destroyer in the Gulf, and often many more. Bahrain is their usual regional base and is home to an indefinite deployment of four British minesweepers, alongside the much larger US Navy presence. While the US clearly eclipsed the UK as the dominant external power in the Gulf in the 1970s, British military influence has remained entrenched among elites.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Class 2020-2 27
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2020-2 27 Jan - 28 Feb 2020 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge, USN 16th President Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge is an honors graduate of the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. He earned a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the Catholic University of America and a Master of Arts with highest distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. He was a fellow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI program. VADM Fritz Roegge, NDU President (Photo His sea tours include USS Whale (SSN 638), USS by NDU AV) Florida (SSBN 728) (Blue), USS Key West (SSN 722) and command of USS Connecticut (SSN 22). His major command tour was as commodore of Submarine Squadron 22 with additional duty as commanding officer, Naval Support Activity La Maddalena, Italy. Ashore, he has served on the staffs of both the Atlantic and the Pacific Submarine Force commanders, on the staff of the director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, on the Navy staff in the Assessments Division (N81) and the Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13), in the Secretary of the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs at the U. S, House of Representatives, as the head of the Submarine and Nuclear Power Distribution Division (PERS 42) at the Navy Personnel Command, and as an assistant deputy director on the Joint Staff in both the Strategy and Policy (J5) and the Regional Operations (J33) Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Download (PDF)
    55 | Combating Hypoxia 52 | Coalitions in Space 34 | Building the Future Force 26 A Desert Storm Medal of Honor? AIR BASE DEFENSE Can the United States Catch Up to the Threat?|39 April 2021 $8 Published by the Air Force Association STAFF Publisher April 2021. Vol. 104, No. 4 Bruce A. Wright Editor in Chief Tobias Naegele Managing Editor Juliette Kelsey Illustration Mike Tsukamoto/sta ; Photos: Tsukamoto/sta Mike Illustration Archives USAF; National Chagnon DEPARTMENTS FEATURES A-10 pilot Ste- Editorial Director 2 Editorial: The 10 Q&A: Protecting the Homeland phen Phillis gave Best Fighter his life to save his John A. Tirpak in the World Air National Guard Director Lt. Gen. Michael A. Loh on wingman. Now, News Editor By Tobias Naegele COVID-19, deployments to the Capitol, and more. 30 years later, a Amy McCullough move is afoot to Assistant 4 Letters upgrade his Sil- Managing Editor 34 Building the New Space Coalition ver Star Medal to Chequita Wood a Medal of Honor. 6 Index to Senior Designer Advertisers By Rachel S. Cohen See p. 55. Partnerships in space could build capabilities and save Dashton Parham 12 Airframes money for everyone. Pentagon Editor Brian W. Everstine 18 Strategy & Policy: Digital Platforms End of the High-Low 39 Defending Forward Bases Editor Mix? By Amy McCullough with Brian W. Everstine Jennifer-Leigh Oprihory 20 Verbatim China and Russia made huge strides in missile Senior Editor technology while U.S. air base defense languished. 21 World: Aerospace Rachel S. Cohen Warfare Now, the U.S. is playing catch-up.
    [Show full text]
  • C-17 Globemaster III
    Backgrounder Boeing Defense, Space & Security P.O. Box 516 St. Louis, MO 63166 www.boeing.com C-17 Globemaster III Description and Purpose: The Boeing C-17 Globemaster III is designed to fulfill military and humanitarian airlift needs well into the 21st century. A high-wing, four-engine, T-tailed aircraft with a rear- loading ramp, the C-17 can carry large combat equipment and troops or humanitarian aid across international distances directly to small austere airfields anywhere in the world. With a payload of 164,900 pounds, the C-17 can take off from a 7,000-foot airfield, fly 2,400 nautical miles, and land on a small, austere airfield of 3,000 feet or less. The C-17 is equipped with an externally blown flap system that allows a steep, low-speed final approach and low-landing speeds for routine short-field landings. Customers: Worldwide, Boeing has delivered 250 C-17s as of January 2013. Boeing’s program of record with the U.S. Air Force is to design, build and deliver 224 C-17s. To date, Boeing has delivered 218 C-17s to the U.S. Air Force. There are 32 C-17s in service with seven international customers. Boeing on Jan. 22 delivered the first of 10 C-17 Globemaster III airlifters for the Indian Air Force. India’s first C-17 will now enter a U.S. Air Force flight test program. The program is on schedule to deliver four more C-17s in 2013 and five in 2014. Qatar, the first Middle East customer to order C-17s, received two C-17s in 2009 and exercised options to receive two C-17s in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Qatar: Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy
    Qatar: Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Updated August 27, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44533 SUMMARY R44533 Qatar: Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy August 27, 2021 The State of Qatar, a small Arab Gulf monarchy which has about 300,000 citizens in a total population of about 2.4 million, has employed its ample financial resources to exert Kenneth Katzman regional influence, often independent of the other members of the Gulf Cooperation Specialist in Middle Council (GCC: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain, and Eastern Affairs Oman) alliance. Qatar has fostered a close defense and security alliance with the United States and has maintained ties to a wide range of actors who are often at odds with each other, including Sunni Islamists, Iran and Iran-backed groups, and Israeli officials. Qatar’s support for regional Muslim Brotherhood organizations and its Al Jazeera media network have contributed to a backlash against Qatar led by fellow GCC states Saudi Arabia and the UAE. In June 2017, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Bahrain, joined by Egypt and a few other governments, severed relations with Qatar and imposed limits on the entry and transit of Qatari nationals and vessels in their territories, waters, and airspace. The Trump Administration sought a resolution of the dispute, in part because the rift was hindering U.S. efforts to formalize a “Middle East Strategic Alliance” of the United States, the GCC, and other Sunni-led countries in the region to counter Iran. Qatar has countered the Saudi-led pressure with new arms purchases and deepening relations with Turkey and Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit of Screening and Quarantine Procedures for Personnel Entering Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar
    Report No. DODIG-2020-128 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY U.S. Department of Defense InspectorSEPTEMBER 24, 2020 General Audit of Screening and Quarantine Procedures for Personnel Entering Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar INTEGRITY INDEPENDENCE EXCELLENCE The document contains information that may be exempt from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Audit of Screening and Quarantine Procedures for ResultsPersonnel Entering in Brief Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar September 24, 2020 Background (cont’d) Objective (U//FOUO) In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 379th AEW took several actions. The Security Squadron The objective of this audit was to developed screening procedures for arriving personnel at determine whether the Air Force the North Gate, which includes checking COVID-19 travel implemented screening and quarantine passes, procedures for personnel entering Al Udeid The Security Squadron Air Base (AUAB), Qatar, in accordance also established screening procedures for other country with applicable guidance in response to nationals arriving at AUAB. The Support Squadron began the coronavirus disease–2019 (COVID-19). performing screening procedures for arriving personnel at We were able to determine whether the air terminal, including screening and quarantine procedures The Medical Group initiated training for were developed; however, because no screening procedures at all U.S.-operated entry points one failed the initial screening during for AUAB. our observations, we could not verify Finding how effectively the quarantine procedures were implemented. Background (U//FOUO) The 379th AEW Security and Support Squadrons developed screening and quarantine procedures for personnel entering AUAB in accordance with applicable guidance in The 379th Air Expeditionary Wing (AEW) response to COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Per Diem Rates
    APPENDIX C1 Foreign Per Diem Rates - Effective October 1, 2018 Season Season Footnote Country Location Start End M&IE Rate Reference Date Date AFGHANISTAN HERAT (NON-US FACILITIES) 01/01 12/31 40 1 AFGHANISTAN HERAT 01/01 12/31 28 1 AFGHANISTAN KABUL (NON-US FACILITIES) 01/01 12/31 100 1 AFGHANISTAN KABUL 01/01 12/31 33 1 AFGHANISTAN MILITARY BASES IN KABUL 01/01 12/31 33 1 AFGHANISTAN MILITARY BASES NOT IN KABUL 01/01 12/31 15 1 AFGHANISTAN [OTHER] (NON-US FACILITIES) 01/01 12/31 50 1 AFGHANISTAN [OTHER] 01/01 12/31 15 1 ALBANIA TIRANA 01/01 12/31 95 ALBANIA [OTHER] 01/01 12/31 41 ALGERIA ALGIERS 01/01 12/31 72 ALGERIA [OTHER] 01/01 12/31 112 ALL PLACES NOT LISTED ALL PLACES NOT LISTED 01/01 12/31 30 ANDORRA ANDORRA 01/01 12/31 123 ANGOLA LUANDA 01/01 12/31 170 ANGOLA [OTHER] 01/01 12/31 170 ANGUILLA THE VALLEY 01/01 12/31 161 ANTARCTICA ANTARCTICA REGION POSTS 01/01 12/31 1 ANTARCTICA MCMURDO STATION ANTARCTICA 01/01 12/31 1 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA ALL CONTRACTOR FACILITIES 01/01 12/31 22 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 05/01 11/30 115 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 12/01 04/30 120 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA [OTHER] 04/16 12/14 18 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA [OTHER] 12/15 04/15 19 ARGENTINA BARILOCHE 01/01 12/31 112 ARGENTINA BUENOS AIRES 01/01 12/31 129 ARGENTINA MENDOZA 01/01 12/31 105 ARGENTINA [OTHER] 01/01 12/31 117 ARMENIA YEREVAN 01/01 12/31 92 ARMENIA [OTHER] 01/01 12/31 92 ASCENSION ISLAND ASCENSION ISLAND 01/01 12/31 29 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE 01/01 12/31 130 AUSTRALIA BENDIGO 01/01 12/31 130 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE 01/01 12/31 105 AUSTRALIA
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Association's Air, Space & Cyber Conference
    Air Force Association’s Air, Space & Cyber Conference REAL. READY. RIGHT CHOICE. BOEING.COM/T- X 2017 AIR, SPACE & CYBER CONFERENCE SPECIAL EDITION AIRFORCEMAG.COM TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURES Air Force Association’s Security on the Brink May You Live in Interesting Eyes to the Future Top Issues—2018 By Brian W. Everstine Times By Amy McCullough Adopted by delegates to the AFA Top Air Force and DOD leaders By John A. Tirpak The Chief’s three focus areas will National Convention on Sept. 17, warn that the nation’s defense USAF’s long list of critical help define what USAF needs for 2017. apparatus is imperiled by modernization programs face future effectiveness. Congressional inaction. disparate challenges. Heat From the Desert Technology Exposition By Brian W. Everstine Race for Speed A Hard Look at Science By John A. Tirpak and Mike From a network of bases across By Wilson Brissett and Technology Tsukamoto the Middle East, the Air Force USAF is preparing to win future By Gideon Grudo The Technology Exposition looked battles ISIS, al Qaeda, and the wars by evolving faster than any For the next year, USAF and to the future. Taliban. adversary can keep up. AFRL are going to step back, collaborate, and listen. DEPARTMENTS WINGMAN AFA Almanac Namesakes: Key Chapter News By Frances McKenney A compendium of facts and figures about the Air Force Association. FOLLOW US: GET THE: ON THE COVER: SrA. Leeann LeClair works on an F-16 for Operation Inherent Resolve. See “Heat From the Desert.” Photo: MSgt. Benjamin Wilson. Air Force Magazine (ISSN 0730-6784) 2017 Air, Space & Cyber Conference Special Edition (Vol.
    [Show full text]