DOCSLIB.ORG

Digital Download (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Digital Download (PDF) 55 | Combating Hypoxia 52 | Coalitions in Space 34 | Building the Future Force 26 A Desert Storm Medal of Honor? AIR BASE DEFENSE Can the United States Catch Up to the Threat?|39 April 2021 $8 Published by the Air Force Association STAFF Publisher April 2021. Vol. 104, No. 4 Bruce A. Wright Editor in Chief Tobias Naegele Managing Editor Juliette Kelsey Illustration Mike Tsukamoto/sta ; Photos: Tsukamoto/sta Mike Illustration Archives USAF; National Chagnon DEPARTMENTS FEATURES A-10 pilot Ste- Editorial Director 2 Editorial: The 10 Q&A: Protecting the Homeland phen Phillis gave Best Fighter his life to save his John A. Tirpak in the World Air National Guard Director Lt. Gen. Michael A. Loh on wingman. Now, News Editor By Tobias Naegele COVID-19, deployments to the Capitol, and more. 30 years later, a Amy McCullough move is afoot to Assistant 4 Letters upgrade his Sil- Managing Editor 34 Building the New Space Coalition ver Star Medal to Chequita Wood a Medal of Honor. 6 Index to Senior Designer Advertisers By Rachel S. Cohen See p. 55. Partnerships in space could build capabilities and save Dashton Parham 12 Airframes money for everyone. Pentagon Editor Brian W. Everstine 18 Strategy & Policy: Digital Platforms End of the High-Low 39 Defending Forward Bases Editor Mix? By Amy McCullough with Brian W. Everstine Jennifer-Leigh Oprihory 20 Verbatim China and Russia made huge strides in missile Senior Editor technology while U.S. air base defense languished. 21 World: Aerospace Rachel S. Cohen Warfare Now, the U.S. is playing catch-up. Production Symposium Manager coverage; Mishaps; Eric Chang Lee New TRANSCOM 44 Advancing U.S. Hypersonics Photo Editor leader; and more ... By John A. Tirpak Mike Tsukamoto As flight-tests begin, the military must overcome shortages 33 Faces of the Force Contributors of talent, test capacity, and supply. Lukas Autenreid, 62 AFA in Action: John T. Correll, Mitchell Institute’s Col. Mark Gunzinger, Aviation and Air 48 Building the Future Force USAF (Ret.), Power Book Series By Col. Mark Gunzinger, USAF (Ret.), and Lukas Autenreid Jennifer Hlad, Benjamin Lambeth, 64 Heroes and The next National Defense Strategy must mitigate against Amanda Miller Leaders: looming strategic risks. ON THE COVER Bernard Fisher 52 The Forensics of Flight Emergencies By Jennifer-Leigh Oprihory ADVERTISING: How military researchers are working to understand—and Kirk Brown prevent—hypoxia-like events in Air Force aircraft fleets. Director, Media Solutions 703.247.5829 55 Above and Beyond Spc. Mustard/USA Derek [email protected] An impact site By Brian W. Everstine from the January Capt. Steve Phillis stayed on station in his A-10, putting himself 2020 missile SUBSCRIBE at risk to aid his downed wingman. The decision cost him his attacks at Al Asad & SAVE Air Base, Iraq. Subscribe to life. Does it also rate the Medal of Honor? See “Defending Air Force Magazine Forward Bases,” p. 39. and save big o 58 Air Power in the War Against ISIS the cover price, plus get a free By Benjamin Lambeth membership Strategy was lacking at the start. Then it made all the di er- to the Air Force ence. Association. 1-800-727-3337 Air Force Magazine (ISSN 0730-6784) April 2021 (Vol. 104, No. 4) is published monthly, except for two double issues in January/February and June/July, by the Air Force Asso- ciation, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington, VA 22209-1198. Phone (703) 247-5800. Periodical postage paid at Arlington, Va., and additional mailing o ices. Membership Rate: $50 per year; $35 e-Membership; $125 for three-year membership. Subscription Rate: $50 per year; $29 per year additional for postage to foreign addresses (except Canada and Mexico, which are $10 per year additional). Regular issues $8 each. USAF Almanac issue $18 each. Change of address requires four weeks’ notice. Please include mailing label. POST- MASTER: Send changes of address to Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington, VA 22209-1198. Publisher assumes no responsibility for unsolicited material. Trademark registered by Air Force Association. Copyright 2021 by Air Force Association. APRIL AIRFORCEMAG.COM EDITORIAL By Tobias Naegele The Best Fighter in the World Springtime in Washington. Pollen—and politics—is in the air. the bike, so will ultimately need another vehicle. It’s self-deception In the Battle of the Budget, the Air Force and its premier ac- to think otherwise. quisition program, the F-35 fighter, is under attack. House Armed Unlike a motorcycle, the magic of the F-35 is that it is far more Services Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Smith launched his than a one-for-one replacement. It buys more value for the money. opening salvo, calling the F-35 “a rathole” and saying he wants to Deterrence. The most cost-effective investments in defense are “figure out how we can get a mix of fighter attack aircraft that’s the ones that, through they’re very presence, change adversaries’ the most cost-effective.” plans and behavior. Why has China and Russia invested so much It’s a curious choice of words. While the projected life-cycle costs in air defense? Why are both pursuing stealth aircraft like the F-35? for all three versions of the F-35 over a span of nearly 40 years is It’s because they know that without them, they don’t stand a chance $1.6 trillion, the $80 million-per-copy cost to acquire these jets is against a U.S. Air Force fully equipped with F-35s. less than some last-generation aircraft—and a bargain consider- Stealth is a disruptive game-changer. It imposes costs on the op- ing the combat-multiplying effect of this vastly superior platform. position. That’s part of what makes it so cost-effective itself. Failing If the F-35 didn’t work—if it couldn’t evade radar, couldn’t fly to buy the full complement of F-35s therefore plays into their hands. in combat, couldn’t compete with the most sophisticated air Few know better than Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. defenses in the world—then it would be right to call it quits. But Brown Jr. how great a threat the U.S. faces from China and the staying the course on F-35 is not buying into a parallel threat he faces in Washington. He “sunk cost fallacy,” where one keeps doubling The radar-evading F-35’s very commanded Pacific Air Forces in his last down on a losing bet in the hopes that things presence changes the nature job before becoming Chief, so he knows the will turn around later. The F-35 is already a of battle. It’s a strategic area and the arc of challenges ranging from success, demonstrating combat flexibility China in the south through North Korea and delivering a decisive advantage in Red investment and combat tool, and Russia in the north. Brown recently Flag exercises. not a tactical one. asked for a review of “tactical aviation” Pilots have raved about the jet’s perfor- and dialed in the Defense Department’s mance. In its first Red Flag, F-35s scored a 20-to-1 kill ratio against Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) office to help. a simulated enemy. In another, it flew 16 simulated offensive counter He believes an objective, credible study can help make his case air missions, eliminating 100 surface-to-air missile sites without to critics like Rep. Smith. losing a plane. That’s not just good performance—it’s unmatched The study could make a big difference, but it also involves risk. performance. Inviting CAPE to the party means bringing in long-time F-35 skep- There are at least three arguments for the F-35 as the most tics. And embracing the naval term “tactical aviation” to describe cost-effective fighter the Air Force can buy: combat aircraft devalues the fifth-generation, manned F-35 to be Stealth. When adversary forces turn on S-400 and future the equal of less-capable older platforms and yet-to-be proven Chinese- and Russian-made air defense systems, what will they unmanned alternatives. The Navy and Marine Corps use the “tac- see? An F-35 shows up on radar as the size of mosquito. It’s not air” term because they see jets as supporting elements to their quite invisible, but it’s too small to track effectively. Eliminate its aircraft carriers and Marine Expeditionary Units. low-observable features and sure, you save some money. You also In fact, however, the radar-evading F-35’s very presence changes give the enemy something they will recognize: targets. the nature of battle. That makes it a strategic investment and combat Suddenly, “cost-effectiveness” takes on a whole new light. What tool, not a tactical one. price shall we put on the lives of American pilots? Is America too Whatever we call it, this combat aviation review must be forward- cheap to put our sons and daughters in the best combat aircraft looking. There is little to be gained by dwelling on the compromises money can buy? wrought by making one airplane meet the competing visions of Mission efficiency. A pair of F-35s can strike multiple targets in three military services. Those decisions are done. If the study a contested environment with no support save, perhaps, a tanker. focuses on combat effectiveness and efficiency, on the cost not of To get two conventional fighter jets to a similarly contested target individual airplanes but of accomplishing the missions they must requires 10 to 20 additional aircraft. The strike jets must be accom- undertake, then the study will yield valuable results.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 38Th RECONNAISSANCE SQUADRON
    38th RECONNAISSANCE SQUADRON MISSION The 38th is responsible for worldwide reconnaissance operations in support of Air Force strategic, airlift, and tactical missions. LINEAGE 38th Pursuit Squadron (Interceptor) constituted, 20 Nov 1940 Activated, 15 Jan 1941 Redesignated 38th Pursuit Squadron (Interceptor) (Twin Engine), 31 Jan 1942 Redesignated 38th Fighter Squadron (Twin Engine), 15 May 1942 Redesignated 38th Fighter Squadron, Twin Engine, 20 Aug 1943 Redesignated 38th Fighter Squadron, Single Engine, 5 Sep 1944 Inactivated, 20 Aug 1946 Redesignated 38th Reconnaissance Squadron, Very Long Range, Mapping, 3 Feb 1947 Activated, 15 Mar 1947 Redesignated 38th Strategic Reconnaissance Squadron, Photo-Mapping, 1 Jul 1949 Inactivated, 14 Oct 1949 Redesignated 38th Strategic Reconnaissance Squadron, Medium, Photo, 27 Oct 1950 Activated, 1 Nov 1950 Redesignated 38th Strategic Reconnaissance Squadron, Medium, 16 Jun 1952 Redesignated 38th Strategic Reconnaissance Squadron, 16 Aug 1966 Inactivated, 1 Apr 1970 Activated, 1 Apr 1979 Redesignated 38th Reconnaissance Squadron, 1 Sep 1991 STATIONS Hamilton Field, CA, 15 Jan 1941 Columbia Aprt, Portland, OR, 21 May 1941 McChord Field, WA, 14 Dec 1941 Paine Field, WA, 9 Sep 1942-20 Aug 1943 Nuthampstead, England, 16 Sep 1943 Wormingford, England, 16 Apr 1944 Kaufbeuren, Germany, 20 Jul 1945 Giebelstadt, Germany, 4 Apr-20 Aug 1946 Clark Field (later, AFB), Philippine Islands, 15 Mar 1947-6 May 1949 Fairfield-Suisan AFB, CA, 26 May 1949 Topeka (later, Forbes) AFB, KS, 1 Jun-14 Oct 1949 Barksdale AFB,
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alliance Coin & Banknote World Coinage
    Alliance Coin & Banknote Summer 2019 Auction World Coinage 1. Afghanistan - Silver 2 1/2 Rupee SH1300 (1921/2) KM.878, VF Est $35 2. Alderney - 5 Pounds 1996 Queen's 70th Birthday (KM.15a), a lovely Silver Proof Est $40 with mixed bouquet of Shamrocks, Roses and Thistle (etc.) on reverse 3. A lovely Algerian Discovery Set - A 9-piece set of Proof 1997 Algerian coinage, each Est $900-1,000 PCGS certified as follows: 1/4 Dinar PR-67 DCAM, 1/2 Dinar PR-69 DCAM, Dinar PR-69 DCAM, 2 Dinar PR-69 DCAM, 5 Dinar PR-69 DCAM, 10 Dinar PR-67 DCAM, 20 Dinar (bimetal Lion) PR-69 DCAM, 50 Dinar (bimetal Gazelle) PR-68 DCAM, completed by a lovely [1994] 100 Dinars bimetal Horse issue, PR-68 DCAM. All unlisted in Proof striking, thus comprising the only single examples ever certified by PCGS, with the Quarter and Half Dinar pieces completely unrecorded even as circulation strikes! Set of 9 choice animal-themed coins, and a unique opportunity for the North African specialist 4. Australia - An original 1966 Proof Set of six coins, Penny to Silver 50 Cents, housed in Est $180-210 blue presentation case of issue with brilliant coinage, the Half Dollar evenly-toned. While the uncirculated sets of the same date are common, the Proof strikings remain very elusive (Krause value: $290) 5. Australia - 1969 Proof Set of 6 coins, Cent to 50 Cents (PS.31), lovely frosted strikings Est $125-140 in original plastic casing, the Five Cent slightly rotated (Cat. US $225) 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Military Presence in the Horn of Africa Region
    SIPRI Background Paper April 2019 THE FOREIGN MILITARY SUMMARY w The Horn of Africa is PRESENCE IN THE HORN OF undergoing far-reaching changes in its external security AFRICA REGION environment. A wide variety of international security actors— from Europe, the United States, neil melvin the Middle East, the Gulf, and Asia—are currently operating I. Introduction in the region. As a result, the Horn of Africa has experienced The Horn of Africa region has experienced a substantial increase in the a proliferation of foreign number and size of foreign military deployments since 2001, especially in the military bases and a build-up of 1 past decade (see annexes 1 and 2 for an overview). A wide range of regional naval forces. The external and international security actors are currently operating in the Horn and the militarization of the Horn poses foreign military installations include land-based facilities (e.g. bases, ports, major questions for the future airstrips, training camps, semi-permanent facilities and logistics hubs) and security and stability of the naval forces on permanent or regular deployment.2 The most visible aspect region. of this presence is the proliferation of military facilities in littoral areas along This SIPRI Background the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa.3 However, there has also been a build-up Paper is the first of three papers of naval forces, notably around the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, at the entrance to devoted to the new external the Red Sea and in the Gulf of Aden. security politics of the Horn of This SIPRI Background Paper maps the foreign military presence in the Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force World by Autumn A
    Air Force World By Autumn A. Arnett, Associate Editor House Passes Fiscal 2015 Defense Spending Bill Langley-Eustis, Va. Carlisle has served as commander of The House approved HR 4870, its version of the Fiscal Pacifi c Air Forces at JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, since 2015 defense spending bill, June 20, providing $491 bil- August 2012. lion in discretionary funding and $79.4 billion for overseas Obama also on July 15 nominated Lt. Gen. Lori J. Robinson contingency operations, including the war in Afghanistan. for a fourth star and for assignment as commander of Pacifi c Air Among the Air Force-related amendments adopted on Forces. She has been ACC vice commander since May 2013. the House fl oor is one introduced by Rep. Candice Miller (R-Mich.) that blocked the Air Force from using Fiscal 2015 funds to divest, retire, transfer, or place into storage any A-10 aircraft or to dissolve any A-10 units. An amendment brought forth by Rep. Jon Runyan (R-N.J.) that prohibits KC-10 retirements in Fiscal 2015 also passed. The House in May passed its version of the Fiscal 2015 screenshot defense authorization bill, which also prevents divestiture of the A-10 fl eet. Medal of Honor Awarded to Marine President Barack Obama awarded the Medal of Honor to retired Marine Corps Cpl. William “Kyle” Carpenter, 24, on June 19 for his conspicuous gallantry during a 2010 battle in Afghanistan where he was seriously injured. “Anybody who has had a chance to get to know this young man knows you’re not going to get a better example of what you want in an American or a marine,” said Obama during the White House ceremony.
    [Show full text]
  • US Military Policy in the Middle East an Appraisal US Military Policy in the Middle East: an Appraisal
    Research Paper Micah Zenko US and Americas Programme | October 2018 US Military Policy in the Middle East An Appraisal US Military Policy in the Middle East: An Appraisal Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 Domestic Academic and Political Debates 7 3 Enduring and Current Presence 11 4 Security Cooperation: Training, Advice and Weapons Sales 21 5 Military Policy Objectives in the Middle East 27 Conclusion 31 About the Author 33 Acknowledgments 34 1 | Chatham House US Military Policy in the Middle East: An Appraisal Summary • Despite significant financial expenditure and thousands of lives lost, the American military presence in the Middle East retains bipartisan US support and incurs remarkably little oversight or public debate. Key US activities in the region consist of weapons sales to allied governments, military-to-military training programmes, counterterrorism operations and long-term troop deployments. • The US military presence in the Middle East is the culmination of a common bargain with Middle Eastern governments: security cooperation and military assistance in exchange for US access to military bases in the region. As a result, the US has substantial influence in the Middle East and can project military power quickly. However, working with partners whose interests sometimes conflict with one another has occasionally harmed long-term US objectives. • Since 1980, when President Carter remarked that outside intervention in the interests of the US in the Middle East would be ‘repelled by any means necessary’, the US has maintained a permanent and significant military presence in the region. • Two main schools of thought – ‘offshore balancing’ and ‘forward engagement’ – characterize the debate over the US presence in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Naval Aviation November 2014
    The Evolving Future for Naval Aviation By Robbin Laird and Ed Timperlake Second Line of Defense November 2014 http://www.sldinfo.com h The Evolving Future of Naval Aviation 1 Table of Contents LESSONS LEARNED AT FALLON: THE USN TRAINS FOR FORWARD LEANING STRIKE INTEGRATION .......................................................................................................................... 2 REAR ADMIRAL MANAZIR, DIRECTOR OF AIR WARFARE (OPNAV N98) ..................................... 7 THE ROLE OF LIVE VIRTUAL TRAINING ................................................................................................. 8 THE IMPACT OF 5TH GEN ON FIGHTING IN THE EXPANDED BATTLESPACE .................................................. 12 RE-THINKING THE SEA BASE ............................................................................................................ 13 THE CARRIER AND JOINT AND COALITION OPERATIONS: SHAPING INVESTMENTS FOR THE FUTURE ............... 14 VICE ADMIRAL WILLIAM MORAN, DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS, (N1), FORMER DIRECTOR OF AIR WARFARE (OPNAV N98) ............................................................................. 15 THE TRANSITION ............................................................................................................................ 15 SHAPING INNOVATION .................................................................................................................... 16 THE COMING OF THE F-35 .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lead IG for Overseas Contingency Operations
    LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS OCTOBER 1, 2016‒DECEMBER 31, 2016 LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL MISSION The Lead Inspector General for Overseas Contingency Operations will coordinate among the Inspectors General specified under the law to: • develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight over all aspects of the contingency operation • ensure independent and effective oversight of all programs and operations of the federal government in support of the contingency operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, and investigations • promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness and prevent, detect, and deter fraud, waste, and abuse • perform analyses to ascertain the accuracy of information provided by federal agencies relating to obligations and expenditures, costs of programs and projects, accountability of funds, and the award and execution of major contracts, grants, and agreements • report quarterly and biannually to the Congress and the public on the contingency operation and activities of the Lead Inspector General (Pursuant to sections 2, 4, and 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978) FOREWORD We are pleased to publish the Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) quarterly report on Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR). This is our eighth quarterly report on the overseas contingency operation (OCO), discharging our individual and collective agency oversight responsibilities pursuant to sections 2, 4, and 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978. OIR is dedicated to countering the terrorist threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in Iraq, Syria, the region, and the broader international community. The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force World by Amy Mccullough, News Editor
    Air Force World By Amy McCullough, News Editor Three Airmen Die in Japan Sept. 29 realigned the 9th Reconnaissance Wing at Beale Three airmen on temporary duty at Kadena Air Base on the AFB, Calif., and the 55th Wing at Offutt AFB, Neb., under Japanese island of Okinawa died Oct. 5. They were washed 25th Air Force. out to sea as Typhoon Phanfone raged around the island. SMSgt. James Swartz, 51, was pronounced dead at a local hospital after the Japanese Coast Guard pulled him from the sea. He was an aerospace propulsion superintendent with the 116th Air Control Wing, Robins AFB, Ga. screenshot HH-60s from Kadena and the Japanese Coast Guard searched for the remaining two airmen, MSgt. Daniel Paschal, 34, and SSgt. Joshua Schoenhoff, 27. Rough seas complicated the rescue efforts, but their bodies were recovered on Oct. 7 and 8. Paschal, also with the 116th Air Control Wing, was an aerospace propulsion craftsman. Schoenhoff was an instru- ment and fl ight control specialist with the 461st Air Control 10.05.2014 Wing at Robins. Airmen at Robins AFB, Ga., prepare to load a C-60 Lodestar Welcome Back, 19th Air Force aircraft into a C-5M Super Galaxy to transport it to the Air Air Education and Training Command reactivated 19th Mobility Command Museum at Dover AFB, Del. The C-5M is Air Force on Oct. 1. The new numbered air force, which had USAF’s only transport capable of carrying the World War II-era been inactivated in 2012, was brought back at the direction of aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Almanac ■ Guide to Air Force Installations Worldwide
    USAFAlmanac ■ Guide to Air Force Installations Worldwide Major Installations Note: A major installation is an Air Force Base, Air Andrews AFB, Md. 20762-5000; 10 mi. SE of 4190th Wing, Pisa, Italy; 31st Munitions Support Base, Air Guard Base, or Air Reserve Base that Washington, D. C. Phone (301) 981-1110; DSN Sqdn., Ghedi AB, Italy; 4190th Air Base Sqdn. serves as a self-supporting center for Air Force 858-1110. AMC base. Gateway to the nation’s (Provisional), San Vito dei Normanni, Italy; 496th combat, combat support, or training operations. capital and home of Air Force One. Host wing: 89th Air Base Sqdn., Morón AB, Spain; 731st Munitions Active-duty, Air National Guard (ANG), or Air Force Airlift Wing. Responsible for Presidential support Support Sqdn., Araxos AB, Greece; 603d Air Control Reserve Command (AFRC) units of wing size or and base operations; supports all branches of the Sqdn., Jacotenente, Italy; 48th Intelligence Sqdn., larger operate the installation with all land, facili- armed services, several major commands, and Rimini, Italy. One of the oldest Italian air bases, ties, and support needed to accomplish the unit federal agencies. The wing also hosts Det. 302, dating to 1911. USAF began operations in 1954. mission. There must be real property accountability AFOSI; Hq. Air Force Flight Standards Agency; Area 1,467 acres. Runway 8,596 ft. Altitude 413 through ownership of all real estate and facilities. AFOSI Academy; Air National Guard Readiness ft. Military 3,367; civilians 1,102. Payroll $156.9 Agreements with foreign governments that give Center; 113th Wing (D. C.
    [Show full text]
  • Final GPS Block IIR Launched by Staff Sgt
    COLORADO SPRING S MILITARY NEW S PAPER GROUP Thursday, August 20, 2009 www.csmng.com Vol. 3 No. 33 Base Briefs 50th Space Wing Change of Final GPS block IIR launched By Staff Sgt. Stacy Foster Command today 50th Space Wing Public Affairs Brig. Gen. Cary Chun will relinquish The final Lockheed Martin-built, GPS block IIR command to Col. Wayne Monteith, spacecraft was successfully launched from Cape 21st Space Wing Vice Commander, Canaveral, Fla. Aug. 17, completing the series of block in a change of command ceremony in IIR and IIR-M satellites and raising the total on-orbit front of the DeKok building at 3 p.m., count to 20. today. Lt. Gen. Larry James, 14th Air The block IIR spacecraft began flying in July 1997 to Force Commander, will be the presid- replenish the network and replace older generations ing official. of GPS satellites. Alternate location will be the Main Lt. Col. Deanna Burt, 2nd Space Operations Fitness center and announcements Squadron commander, said the final eight craft were will be made in case of inclement modernized to transmit additional signals and provide weather. improvements aimed at greater accuracy, tougher re- For more information, contact Lt. sistance to interference and enhanced performance. Col. Jean Eisenhut at 567-3600. The GPS satellite program at Schriever is a col- laborative effort between the active duty 2nd SOPS 50 SW/CC to hold last and the Air Force Reserve’s 19th Space Operations Commander’s Call today Squadron. Brig. Gen. Cary Chun will hold his “We have a great symbiotic total force relation- last Commander’s Call as 50th Space ship with 2nd SOPS.
    [Show full text]
  • S/Sgt Charles L. Jordan
    S/Sgt Charles L. Jordan 17 July 1944 – S/Sgt Charles L Jordan assigned to 2nd Lt Raymond V Clay Crew – 326th Bomb Sq 2nd Lt Raymond V Clay 0760786 2nd lt William B Goodale 0709217 2nd Lt Jmes A McAteer 0719111 2nd Lt Bernard J Masson 0772692 S/Sgt Charles L Jordan 34652328 S/Sgt Leonard R Spalding 19099312 Sgt Ralph E Bruhn 16135138 Sgt Lawrence B Crook 35057336 Sgt Mervin J Hawthorne 37721053 Sgt Roy E Jenson 36826038 Clay Crew S/Sgt Charles L. Jordan 1 August 1944 – 582 A/C 42-102582 – Canvass Back II with Lt Maltby Crew 1st August, 1944. Mission # 170 to Orleans / Bricey, Chateaudun, France; airbases. 92nd Bomb Group (H) Fame’s Favored Few - Turner, Mission List From 92ndma.org, and 92nd B-17 Aircraft Roster. (Sources). “On 1st August, we potted the airdromes at Orleans and Chateaudun with good to excellent hits on both, as shown in strike photos. Opposition nil. Light inaccurate flak.” Entry from 326th Squadron Daily Operations Journal: “1st August, 1944. Twelve crews bombed airfields in the Orleans-Chateaudun area; Lt. Utt - 848-M with Lt. McChesney, bombardier led the 40th "A"; reported very good visual bombing results; other crews: S/Sgt Charles L. Jordan Shanks - 005-A Gravelle - 614-H Reifsteck - 217-L Spencer - 847-C Johnson - 697-N Glasco – 156-E Clay - 582-D Cooke - 535-F Lindstrom - 293-B Smith - 121-G McCormick - 848-S 227-P, 907-J flew with the 407th Opposition nil; light, accurate flak.” 3 August 1944-535 A/C 43-37535 “Baby Button” with Gravelle Crew S/Sgt Charles L.
    [Show full text]