June 2017

Heritage Conservation District Plan King-Spadina

HCD Plan 2017 King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District City Of Toronto King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Plan June 2017 Cover pageimagebyVikPahwa R.E. Millward DTAH Archaeological ServicesInc. Taylor HazellArchitectsInc.,and with City of Toronto, CityPlanning TABLE OFCONTENTS

King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Plan City Of Toronto King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Plan June 2017 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Table ofContents 4.3 4.2 4.1 2.5 2.4 Official 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 ii. i. Heritage Attributes...... 40 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value ...... 36 Description ofHistoricPlace...... 36 District Significance Statement ofObjectives Applicable GuidelinesandPlans...... 28 Zoning By-laws ...... 25 Provincial PolicyStatement ...... 21 Ontario Heritage Act ...... 20 Legislative andPolicy Framework Historic Overview ...... 13 Consultation ...... 12 Public EngagementandCommunity Project Background ...... 11 and City Building...... 10 City ofToronto'sVisionforHeritage Introduction How toRead ThisPlan The PurposeofthePlan Plan ...... 22 5.0 6.0 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.3 Typologies ...... 50 5.2 Building 5.1 6.17 6.16 6.15 6.14 6.13 6.12 6.11 6.10 6.9 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.5 CodeCompliance...... 77 6.4 6.3 6.2 6.1

Archaeological Resources ...... 70 Parks ...... 68 Character Sub-Areas ...... 58 Network of Laneways ...... 56 Non-Contributing Properties ...... 54 Contributing and District Boundary...... 48 andResources District Boundary Signage ...... 90 Lighting ...... 90 Entrances, PorchesandBalconies...... 89 Exterior Walls...... 88 Windows andDoors...... 87 Roofs ...... 86 Massing ...... 81 Alteration ...... 80 Restoration ...... 79 Maintenance ...... 78 Removal andRelocation...... 78 Demolition ...... 77 Combined Properties...... 76 Existing Part IV Designations ...... 76 Conservation ...... 75 Understanding ...... 74 Contributing Properties Policies andGuidelinesfor 9.0 8.0 7.0 9.4 9.3 9.2 9.1 8.4 8.3 8.2 8.1 7.12 7.11 7.10 7.9 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.5 7.4 7.3 7.2 7.1

Utilities and PublicWorks ...... 117 Network ofLaneways ...... 116 Views ...... 114 and Victoria Memorial Square ...... 112 St. Andrew'sPlayground,ClarenceSquare Parks andPublicRealm Policies andGuidelinesfor Duncan Street...... 108 Spadina Avenue ...... 107 Wellington Place...... 106 St. Andrew's...... 106 Character Sub-Areas Policies andGuidelinesfor Parking andServiceAreas...... 102 Signage ...... 102 Lighting ...... 101 Roofs ...... 101 Exterior Walls ...... 100 Articulation andProportions...... 100 Massing ...... 98 Alterations andAdditions...... 97 Demolition ...... 97 Combined Properties ...... 96 Adjacency to Contributing Properties ...... 96 Understanding ...... 95 Non-Contributing Properties Policies andGuidelinesfor 11.0 Procedures 10.0 Appendices 12.0 Recommendations 10.3 10.2 10.1 E: ListofNon-ContributingProperties ...... 199 D: StatementofContribution ...... 155 C: Index of Contributing Properties ...... 146 B: HeritageIncentives ...... 145 142 ...... Definitions A: 11.2 11.1 10.4 ArchaeologicalAssessment ...... 134 10.3 10.2 10.1

Sensitive Area...... 128 Victoria MemorialSquareArchaeologically Sensitive Area...... 127 Toronto General Hospital Archaeologically Archaeological Resource Requirements ...... 120 Archaeological Resources and Implementation...... 138 Heritage Awarness Periodic Review...... 138 Heritage Impact Assessment ...... 133 Heritage PermitProcess...... 132 Heritage PermitsDeemed to beIssued...... 132

King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Plan City Of Toronto King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Plan June 2017 generally beundertakenwithout aheritagepermit. Toronto PropertyStandards By-Lawandwhichcan beyond maintenanceasrequired bytheCityof make improvementsoralterations totheirproperties does notcompelpropertyownerstoproactively where changesarebeingproposed.TheHCDPlan municipally-owned propertieswithintheDistrict This HCDPlanappliestoallprivatelyand District incentives foreligibleconservationworkwithinthe conservation anditwillprovideaccesstofinancial enhanced understandingofthebenefitsheritage value oftheKing-Spadinaarea,itwillfacilitatean awareness ofthesignificantculturalheritage In addition,theHCDPlanwillcreateagreater − − − − − purpose oftheHCDPlanisto: As perPartVoftheOntarioHeritageAct, Council. District andwillinformthedecisionsofcitystaff development applicationsandpermitswithinthe and guidelineshereinwillguidethereviewof heritage attributes.Thisdocumentandthepolicies protection, conservationandmanagementofits District's culturalheritagevaluethroughthe to establishaframeworkthatwillconservethe The purposeoftheKing-SpadinaHCDPlanis The PurposeofthePlan − − − − − carry outwithoutobtainingapermit that theownerofapropertyinDistrictmay describe thealterationsorclassesof change intheDistrict achieving thestatedobjectivesandmanaging develop policies,guidelinesandproceduresfor achieved inthedesignationofDistrict develop aStatementofObjectivestobe describe theheritageattributesofDistrict heritage valueorinterestoftheDistrict create astatementexplainingthecultural present. public realmwhileachievingdesignexcellentinthe a designcontributestothesurroundingcontextand process, anindependentreviewthatcanhelpensure subject totheCityofTorontoDesignReviewPanel Preservation Board,proposedchangesmaybe of alldevelopmentapplicationsbytheToronto will haveontheDistrict.Inadditiontoreview response totheimpactsproposeddevelopment high-quality materialsandasensitivethoughtful the useofbestpracticesinheritageconservation, reflect designexcellenceandinnovationthrough development ofnon-contributingpropertiesshould The conservationofcontributingpropertiesandre- conservation oftheDistrict’sculturalheritagevalue. and guidelinesthatareintendedtosupportthe The Planincludesspecificandgeneralpolicies Encouraging DesignExcellence applies toallpropertieswithintheDistrict.The provides important,foundationalinformationthat Sections 3and4–StatementofObjectives framework withintheDistrict. conservation, aswellananalysisoftheplanning supporting guidelinesastheyrelatetoheritage provides anoverviewofapplicablepolicyand Section 2–LegislativeandPolicyFramework purpose. consultation, historicoverviewandthePlan’s of thestudyandplanprocess,includingcommunity heritage conservationandcitybuilding,summary the Plan,includingCityofToronto’svisionfor Section 1–Introduction considerations. whether thereareanyarchaeologicalorpublicrealm property type,classification,charactersub-area,and Plan whichapplytopropertiesdependinguponthe should bepaidtosections6through10ofthe Plan shouldbereadasawhole,particularattention Plan tounderstanditsscopeandintent.Whilethe encouraged tofamiliarizethemselveswiththeentire Property ownerswithintheDistrictarestrongly and guidelines. significance; sections6through10providepolicies on theDistrict’sculturalheritagevalueand should bereferredtobythoseseekinginformation achieve thestatedobjectives.Sections1,3,4and5 as welltoprovidepoliciesandguidelines heritage value,resourcesandsignificance, Heritage ConservationDistrict’s(theDistrict)cultural those seekingtobetterunderstandtheKingSpadina Plan (thePlan)isintendedtoprovideinformationfor The King-SpadinaHeritageConservationDistrict toRead How This Plan providesbackgroundon

found inAppendixA. document havebeendefined;definitionscanbe Italicized termsinSections6through10ofthis of thePlan. and therecommendedscheduleforperiodicreview owners ofcontributingpropertieswithintheDistrict, information onthefinancialincentivesavailableto Section 12–Recommendations heritage permitprocess. require reviewagainstthePlan,andoutlines will beused,includingalistofactivitiesthatdonot Section 11–Procedures objectives ofthePlan. change withintheDistrictinordertomeet provide thepoliciesandguidelinesformanaging Sections 6through10–PoliciesandGuidelines methodology fortheiridentificationandevaluation. heritage resourceswithintheDistrict,including building typologies,charactersub-areasandother includes adescriptionofthedistrictboundary, Section 5–DistrictBoundaryandResources are referredtothroughoutthedocument. heritage attributesarethefoundationofPlan,and objectives, statementofculturalheritagevalueand describeshowthePlan provides important

King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Plan City Of Toronto King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Plan June 2017 1.0 Introduction 1.4 HistoricOverview 1.3 1.2 1.1 Public EngagementandCommunityConsultation Project Background City ofToronto'sVisionforHCDsandBuilding

9 Introduction | King-Spadina HCD Plan 10 Introduction | King-Spadina HCD Plan City Of Toronto June 2017 policy andtheCity’sown OfficialPlan. demonstrate compliance withprovincialplanning interest, haveregardtoprovincial interests,and enhance civicengagement;protectthepublic influence conservationandplanningoutcomes; areas; leverageeconomicdevelopment;positively also valuedfortheirabilitytostrengthenbusiness place forpresentandfuturegenerations.Theyare Toronto asamulticultural,sustainableandequitable continue tocontributethelivabilityandappeal of places thatspeaktoToronto’srichhistoryandwhich regulatory toolthatenabletheCitytorecognize Heritage conservationdistrictsareavaluable City Council. all Citydepartmentsstrivetoachieveasmandatedby complementary, andreflectsthecommongoalsthat amendments ensuresthattheregulatoryprocessis Site andAreaSpecificPoliciesZoningBy-law of SecondaryPlans,OfficialPlanamendments, and otherCitydepartmentsinthedevelopment coordination betweenHeritagePreservationServices the CityofToronto’sHeritageRegister.Inaddition, Part IVoftheOntarioHeritageAct,andlistingon as wellindividualpropertydesignationunder district underPartVoftheOntarioHeritageAct, includes designationasaheritageconservation attributes ofheritagepropertiesandareas-this used toconservetheculturalheritagevaluesand A rangeofregulatorytoolsavailabletotheCityare conservation ofsignificantheritageareas. Toronto CityCouncilisactingtoensuretheongoing of sustainabledevelopmentandplace-making widely understoodtobeanimportantcomponent of itsover2.5millionresidents.Culturalheritageis parks, aswellthetraditionsandculturalspaces neighbourhood system,mainstreets,ravinesand in thebuiltformandlandscapesofitsextensive Toronto’s diverseculturalheritageisreflected 1.1 CITY OF TORONTO'S VISION FORHCDS AND CITYBUILDING sustainable, prosperousandequitablecity. across Toronto,inordertocontributeahealthy, historic neighbourhoods,mainstreetsandareas that expresstheuniqueheritagecharacterof is thattheywillcontinuetoconservethosefeatures Toronto’s visionforheritageconservationdistricts tree canopyanddiversityinbuiltform.TheCityof walkability, spacesforsmallbusinesses,ahealthy Conservation Districtsalreadypromoteandsupport have cometodefineToronto.OurexistingHeritage respects andtakesadvantageofthefeaturesthat that growthandchangearemanagedinaway conservation districtsarewell-positionedtoensure As Torontoevolvesandexpands,heritage responsive heritageplanningsystem. policy-driven planswithinaclear,predictableand and transparentprocessinthedevelopmentof in Toronto.Itsgoalistoensureafair,consistent and planningofheritageconservationdistrictswithin Act, andprovidesadetailedapproachtothestudy built upontherequirementsofOntarioHeritage Policies andTermsofReference(2012),whichis Conservation DistrictsinToronto:Procedures, heritage districts.CityCounciladoptedHeritage opportunities inconservingandbenefitingfrom Toronto facesuniquechallengesaswell goals, recognizingthat,asCanada’slargestcity, for heritageconservationdistrictstoachievethese The Cityhascreateditsownsuiteofpolicytools enhance ouruniquehistoricneighbourhoods. place-based policiesandguidelinestoconserve are valuedfortheirabilitytoprovidecontextual, priority becauseheritageconservationdistricts heritage conservationdistrictsisaCityPlanning The identification,evaluationanddesignationof a singlePlanwouldbebetter abletoalignwith and heritageattributes.It wasalsodeterminedthat Plans, andrepetitionintheir culturalheritagevalues that therewassignificantoverlapbetweenthetwo it wasdeterminedbyCitystaffandtheconsultants In theinitialstagesofPlanprocessforeacharea September andOctober2014. Hazell ArchitectswithArchaeologicalServicesInc. in of additionalpropertieswascompletedbyTaylor text descriptionsandphotographs.Thesurvey and astandardizedformwascompletedwith regardless ofage,conditionorheritagepotential, recording ofexistingconditionsandcharacteristics within thestudyareaboundary,isanobjective The survey,whichiscompletedforallproperties completed foreachoftheadditionalproperties. a BuiltFormandLandscapeSurveyformwas Policies andTermsofReference(HCDsinToronto), Conservation DistrictsinToronto:Procedures, As arequirementoftheCityToronto’sHeritage 115 propertieswithintheexpandedboundaryarea. September 2014.Itstartedwiththesurveyof Work onthetwoHCDplanscommencedin Preservation BoardinMay2014. and itsrecommendationswasendorsedbyToronto and entertainmentdistricts)proceed.Thestudy parts andthatplansfortwoareas(thecommercial study recommendedthattheareabedividedintotwo Street WestaswellSt.Andrew’sPlayground.The and tothenorthincludebothsidesofAdelaide to thewestcapturebothsidesofBathurstStreet study processtheHCDareaboundarywasexpanded 2012 andcommencedinApril2013.Throughthe was authorizedbyTorontoCityCouncilinOctober and thenanHCDPlan.TheKing-SpadinaStudy process whichinvolvescompletionofanHCDStudy are identifiedanddesignatedthroughaphased In Toronto,heritageconservationsdistricts(HCDs) 1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND revisions. policies, amongstgeneralformattingandlanguage Typologies, aswellmodificationstothemassing the refinementofCharacterSub-AreasandBuilding the Planwhereappropriate.Thesechangesincluded were reviewedbyCityStaff,andrevisionsmadeto three weekpublicreviewperiod.Commentsreceived In October2016,adraftHCDPlanwasreleasedfor property inaccordancewithHCDsToronto. Contribution wasdevelopedforeachcontributing classified ascontributingproperties.AStatementof properties thatrepresentedtheidentifiedvalueswere Statement ofObjectivesweredeveloped,and A StatementofCulturalHeritageValueanda reflect fine-grainedanduniqueattributes. combined, andcharactersub-areaswerecreatedto Secondary Plan.Asaresult,thetwoPlanswere the area,includingrevisionstoKing-Spadina existing anddevelopingplanninginitiativeswithin 11

Introduction | King-Spadina HCD Plan 12 Introduction | King-Spadina HCD Plan City Of Toronto June 2017 1.3 comments priortofinalization. review periodonOctober25,2016inordertosolicit Plan wasmadeavailableforathreeweekpublic feedback tothestudyteam.AdraftofHCD information ontheCity’swebsite,andtoprovide prepared, thepublicwasinvitedtoaccessthis drafts oftheStudy,Planandothermaterialwere engagement activitieshavebeenundertaken.As community consultationsandaseriesofstakeholder the community,City’sprocedureoftwo To fulfilltherequirementtoconsultandinform council shallensurethat, under subsection41(1)or(2),the district planismadebythecouncilofamunicipality (6) Before aby-lawadoptingheritageconservation specifies: The OntarioHeritageAct(OHA)PartV,Section41.1 • • • 2005, c. 6,s.31. the proposedheritageconservationdistrictplan. 28, thecommitteeisconsultedwithrespectto a municipalheritagecommitteeundersection if thecouncilofmunicipalityhasestablished plan; and to theproposedheritageconservationdistrict at leastonepublicmeetingisheldwithrespect the plan,ismadeavailabletopublic; conservation districtplan,includingacopyof information relatingtotheproposedheritage PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNITYCONSULTATION 31, 2017. (BIA), alongwiththelocalCityCouncillor,onMarch Entertainment DistrictBusinessImprovementArea provide clarification.Thisincludedameetingwith the interested stakeholderstoreceivecommentsand comment onOctober25,2016CityStaffmetwith Following thereleaseofdraftHCDPlanfor information. Toronto PreservationBoard,andwasreceivedfor King-Spadina HCDPlanwaspresentedtothe On November2,2016anupdateonthedraft recommendations. sub-areas, buildingtypologiesandpolicy draft objectives,contributingproperties,character Spadina HeritageConservationDistrict,including June 23,2016topresentthecombinedKing- A communityconsultationmeetingwasheldon community feedback. the HCDstodate,andprovidedanopportunityfor District. Thesemeetingspresentedtheworkon on April21,2015fortheKing-SpadinaCommercial 20, 2015fortheKing-SpadinaCulturalDistrictand Community consultationmeetingswereheldonApril proceed totheplanphase. endorsement totheTorontoPreservationBoard May 2014theHCDStudyreportwaspresentedfor took placeinSeptemberandNovember2013.In meetings, consultationswithstakeholdergroups and March18,2014.Inadditiontothetwopublic King-Spadina HCDStudyphaseonJune25,2013 Community consultationmeetingswereheldforthe Summary ofCommunityConsultations it isdoubtfulthattheywere developedinthatway from the1790sdosuggest apark-likesetting,but of landwereusedaspark areas.Someearlymaps There isnodirectevidencethattheselargeblocks unspecified “publicpurposes.” the boundaryofMilitaryReservewereforother, was proposed.Landsbetweenthecollegeplotand for acollegeandtoitsimmediatesouthcemetery corner ofLot(Queen)andPeterstreetswassetaside respectively. Anothertenacreparcelatthesoutheast Market (nowWellington)streetsandthelakeshore, Newgate (nowAdelaide)streetsandPeter,John, parks orsquaresboundedbyPeter,King,Johnand and “SimcoePlace,”whichwereproposedasformal major publicuses,whichincluded“RussellSquare” for development,andalsoreservedlargeareas create 15townblocksmadeupof3to18lots streets, extendedthebasicstreetgridwestwardto The planfortheexpansionbetweenYorkandPeter Town whichwerecarriedoutin1796and1797. Canada, issuedtheorderforsurveysofNew market. PeterRussell,theReceiverGeneralofUpper including achurch,school,courthouse,jailand to beoccupiedbyanumberofpublicbuildings the MilitaryReserve.Thesenewtownlandswere extending westasfarPeterStreetwhichabutted Street) andwesttoYorkStreetthesecond surveys, thefirstnorthtoLotStreet(nowQueen In 1797,theTownofYorkwasexpandedbytwo 1.5.1 have beenmadetotheHCDStudytext,below. available onlineattheCity’swebsite.Minorrevisions HCD Study.Thefulltextincludingreferencesis overview oftheDistrictfromKing-Spadina The followingtextisanexcerptofthehistoric 1.4 The NewTownExpansion,1797 HISTORIC OVERVIEW east sideofJohn andKingin1828-1830. 1820, andUpperCanada Collegewasbuiltonthe northwest cornerofKing andJohnstreetsin1819- The TorontoGeneralHospital wasbuiltatthe were putintoeffectshortly aftertheWarof1812. institutions atthewesterlyendofNewTown of theplansfordevelopmentmajorpublic ground atthefuturesiteofVictoriaSquare.Some none oftheseearlymapsshowthemilitaryburial road allowanceofSpadinaAvenue.Curiously, northwest cornerofFrontStreetandtheunopened and anassociatedofficeorstoresbuildingatthe Square. The1818mapshowsamilitaryfuelyard bakehouse onornearthefuturesiteofClarence area westofPeterStreet,the1814plandepictsa Within theMilitaryReserveportionofstudy the OldTown,andhadnotyetbecomefashionable. from themaincommercialandresidentialareasof because itwasstillconsideredtoberather“remote” slow developmentoftheNewTownmayhavebeen held bytheirownersonspeculation.Theseemingly houses, suggestingthatmanyofthepropertieswere York andPeterstreetsconsistedoffewerthan20 Civilian developmentintheNewTownbetween in anydetailaresurveysfrom1813,1814and1818. development intheNewTownandMilitaryReserve The earliestmapstoshowtheactualcourseof Parliament buildingsofUpperCanada. Simcoe PlacewasdevelopedasthesiteofThird Upper CanadaCollegewasbuilt.Simultaneously the “RussellSquare”landswereclearedwhen or perhapsforgrazingtheirlivestock.In1829, neighbouring residentsforrecreationalpurposes, late 1820s.Theymayhavebeeninformallyusedby to haveretainedtheiroriginalforestcoveruntilthe Crown forsomefuturepublicpurposes,andappear Islands). Thesereservessimplywereheldbythe Town andthepeninsula(nowpartofToronto of earlyYorkwasonthelakeshoreclosertoOld since themainrecreationalfocusforinhabitants 13

Introduction | King-Spadina HCD Plan 14 Introduction | King-Spadina HCD Plan City Of Toronto June 2017 were stilllockedupinthe MilitaryReserve;only However, intheStudyarea, mostoftheproperties 485 two-storeyhouses,and 100merchant’sshops, The newCitycontained529one-storeyhouses, of theUpperCanadianLegislatureinMarch1834. The CityofTorontowasincorporatedthroughan act 1.5.3 in 1811byarchitectJohnNash. was influencedbyLondon’sRegentStreet,designed flanked byspacioushomes.Thisdevelopmentplan linked byWellingtonPlace,abroadtree-linedavenue cemetery. Thesetwopublicsquaresweretobe that incorporatedthesiteoforiginalmilitary of anewGovernmentHouse,andVictoriaSquare, Clarence Square,originallyproposedasthelocation plan includedthecreationofpublicparkson in 1837.Asignificantfeatureofthedevelopment acceptance, wasthatcompletedbyWilliamHawkins The finalsurvey,thatappearstohavemetwith 1837. twelve timesbetweenNovember1833andMarch agreed upon.Theareawassurveyednolessthan of theformerreservelandswerefarfromuniversally surveyed andsold,howeverplansfordevelopment In November1833,thefirst18,one-acrelotswere War of1812schemesforthedefenceYork. land attackfromthewestanddidnotfigureinpost- provide anadequatedefenseforthetownagainsta clear thatFortYorkandtheMilitaryReservedidnot Following theBattleofYorkinApril1813,itwas 1.5.2 Development, c.1840s The FirstWaveofResidential and DevelopmentVision,1830s The DissolutionoftheMilitaryReserve the west,RossinHouse panoramasuggests to residentialpurposes.Beyond SimcoeStreetto in mostcasesappeartohave beenprimarilydevoted was devotedtoretailspace,whiletheupperfloors multi-storey brickbuildings.Oftenthegroundfloor the CityofToronto,manythesestructureswere Street wasatthattimetheprincipalthoroughfare in residential andcommercialproperties.SinceKing far westasSimcoecontainedamixtureofboth neighbourhood clearlyshowthatKingStreetas Street in1856.TheviewswesttotheKing-Spadina the southeastcornerofKingStreetWestandYork taken fromtheroofofRossinHouseHotelat The earliestknownphotographsoftheareawere streets betweenSpadinaandPortlandstreets. erected onthesouthsidesofbothKingandAdelaide as well.By1858,additionalstructureshadbeen had beenbuiltonthesouthsideofWellingtonPlace either sideofAdelaide.Afewadditionalstructures between RichmondandAdelaideonSimcoe additional constructiononeithersideofPeter between JohnandPeter.By1851therehadbeen side ofAdelaidearoundPortlandandonRichmond from SpadinatonearlyasfarBathurst,oneither be builtupinthiswaywereonthesouthsideofKing the largertownlotswasunderway.Thefirstareasto dwellings onsmallerresidentiallotssubdividedfrom By theearly1840s,constructionofothermodest northeast cornerofAdelaideandSimcoeStreets. Block, arowoffive,three-storeytownhousesatthe of higherdensitydevelopmentwastheBishop’s Elmsley House,andLyndhurst.Theearliestexample large estategrounds,suchasBeverleyHouse, Military Reservetendedtobelargehomesseton The earliestresidencesintheNewTownandformer way. properties, andeventhenitwasinarelativelysmall the blockseastofPeterStreetcontainedresidential side ofKingStreet.Other firmsopenedwithinafew industrial useslocatedtheir operationonthesouth to NiagaraStreet.Within the nextyears,similar side ofKingStreet,fromjusteastSpadina within thestudyareawerecentredalongnorth By themid-1880s,majorindustrialdevelopments 1904 eastofthestudyarea. two mostdamagingofwhichoccurredin1849and fires thatdamagedblocksinthedowntowncore, the been acontributingfactorinsomeofthedisastrous planning duringthenineteenthcenturymayhave into the1870sand1880s.Thislackofcarefulurban continued asfarnorthCollege-CarletonStreetwell industrial developmentinthedowntowncore and seeminglyhaphazardmixtureresidential the bird’seyeviewlithographsshowthisuneasy establishments. TheRossinHousepanoramaand structures andprofessionalmercantile same blocksas,orlocatednextdoorto,residential industrial operationsoftensharedspacewithinthe was relativelyaffordable.Typicaloftheera,these convenient accesstotheharbourandrailways Spadina area,wherelargeareasofvacantlandwith in the1850sattractedindustrytoKing- The arrivaloftherailwaystoTorontowaterfront 1.5.4 Street. concentrated aswhatwasthenfoundalongKing located alongthesestreets,itwasnotashighly buildings. Whiletherewascommercialactivity modest innature,beingoneortwostoreyframe many ofthestructuresappeartohavebeenmore in character.AlongthestreetstonorthofKing, that thestreetscapebecamemuchmoreresidential Intensification, c.1860sto1940s Residential andIndustrial with additionsin1913. Case Co.Building,designedbyGouinlockin1893 (Gouinlock 1905,1913),andtheAmericanWatch (Prack 1927,1934-1935),WarwickBros.&Rutter & Gregg,1903),CanadianWestinghouseBuilding Gregg, 1907),theEclipseWhitewearBuilding(Gregg & White,1917-19),theGillettbuilding(Wickson in 1907),theCanadianGEbuilding(Burke,Horwood Dominion PaperBoxCobuilding(J.FrancisBrown (designed byGouinlock&Bakerin1901),the buildings includetheTorontoLithographingBuilding prominent architectsfortheirclients.Someofthese area duringtheearly1900sweredesignedby Some ofthefactoriesconstructedwithinstudy Bathurst, wereregardedasslums. of thestudyarea,particularlyaroundSpadinaand was increasinglyoperatedasroominghouses.Parts building stock,muchofwhichwasdeterioratedand, commercial warehousesbegintoreplaceresidential The nextwaveofconstructionsawfactoriesand early twentiethcenturies. primarily residentialthroughoutthenineteenthand etc.). Thenorth-southcrossstreetsremained proprietors (e.g.carpenters,shoemakers,tinsmiths, additional workspacetosmall,independent housing andlanewayscourtyardsproviding residential incharacter,withnearcontinuousrow Richmond Streetstothenorthremainedprimarily years onthesouthsideofstreet.Adelaideand 15

Introduction | King-Spadina HCD Plan 16 Introduction | King-Spadina HCD Plan City Of Toronto June 2017 materials installedbyEuropean artisans. Theatre wasfittedoutusing thefinestimported style. Theresultantstructure,theRoyalAlexandra a newfire-prooftheatreintheFrenchBeaux-Arts renowned architect,JohnMacIntoshLyle,todesign been purchasedbyCawthraMulock,whohiredthe former groundsofUpperCanadaCollegehad In 1905,apropertyfrontingKingStreetonthe the areabetweenUniversityandSpadinaAvenues. sports venuesandnightclubswereconcentratedin Entertainment venuessuchastheatres,restaurants, as Toronto’spremierEntertainmentDistrict. a renaissanceduringthelatetwentiethcentury The King-Spadinaneighbourhoodexperienced 1.5.6 lots. they hadoccupiedusedtocreatesurfaceparking housing stockwasdemolishedandthesitesthat space forsmallbusinessesandoffices.Muchofthe sat vacant,orportionsofthemwereconvertedinto decline andmanyofthelargeoldfactorybuildings goods toorfromToronto’sharbourbegan transportation. Thustheimportanceofshipping created anincreaseinautomobilesandroad Roads policyduringthe1910sand1920swhich downtown coreasaresultoftheprovincialGood industries begantorelocateoutsideofthemain During thesecondhalfoftwentiethcentury, 1.5.5 Industries c.1980stoToday and CulturalEmployment/Creative Adaptive Reuse:EntertainmentDistrict Residential Areas,c.1950sto1980s Industrial ChangeandShrinking educational uses. entertainment, commercial,shopping,culturaland mixed-use neighbourhoodthatincludesresidential, in commonuse,King-Spadinaisnowavibrant While theEntertainmentDistrictnamehasremained beam buildings,aswellresidentialdevelopment. and culturaltenantstothearea’sdistinctbrick-and- reinvigorating theDistrict,attractingcommercial highly successfulinfacilitatingnewusesand The 1996regenerationplanningframeworkwas character. of theDistrict’sdistinctivecommercialwarehouse form regulations,andrequiredtheconservation right developmentpermissions,andnewbuilt significant flexibilityinlandusepolicies,as-of- new regenerationpolicyframeworkprovided to theeastandwestoffinancialcore.This uses withinboththeformerwarehousedistricts Kings”, inresponsetothedecliningmanufacturing King-Parliament neighbourhoods,referredtoas“The planning policyframeworkfortheKing-Spadinaand In 1996,theCityofTorontodevelopedanambitious other restaurants. invested inadjoiningrealestate,whereheopened original restaurantincreasedinpopularity,Mirvish Street Westintoanentertainmentdestination.Asthe affordable pricesbegantoturnthissectionofKing refurbished theatreandnearbyqualitydiningat which becameEd’sWarehouseRestaurant.The bought oneoftheadjoiningvacantfactorybuildings Entertainment Districtweknowtoday.In1964,he Mirvish’s actionsmaybesaidtothebirthof structure wassoldto“HonestEd”Mirvishin1963. the adventofmotionpicturesandtelevision.The Wars, theGreatDepressionof1930s,and The RoyalAlexcontinuedtooperatedespiteWorld 17

Introduction | King-Spadina HCD Plan

2.0 Legislative andPolicy Framework 2.5 OfficialPlan 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 Applicable GuidelinesandPlans Zoning By-Laws Provincial PolicyStatement Ontario HeritageAct 19 Legislative and Policy Framework | King-Spadina HCD Plan 20 Legislative And Policy Framework | King-Spadina HCD Plan City Of Toronto June 2017 2.1 provided by the OHA. This Planmeetstherequirements ofanHCDPlanas following asrequirementsofanHCDPlan: Part V,Section41.1(5),oftheOHAlists designation ofheritageconservationdistricts. Official Plansupportsidentification,evaluationand the establishmentofsuch.TheCityToronto’s their officialplancontainsprovisionsrelatingto to establishheritageconservationdistrictswhere Under PartVoftheOHAmunicipalitiesareenabled preservation ofheritageresourcesintheProvince. created tosupportconservation,protectionand (OHA) (RSO1990,Amended2005),whichwas conservation inOntarioistheHeritageAct The keypieceoflegislationthatgovernsheritage − − − − − ONTARIOHERITAGE ACT permit undersection42. 2005, c. 6,s.31. building ontheproperty, withoutobtaininga other thantheinteriorofanystructureor to becarriedoutonanypartoftheproperty, conservation districtmaycarryoutorpermit that theownerofpropertyinheritage of alterationsthatareminorinnatureand a descriptionofthealterationsorclasses conservation district;and and managingchangeintheheritage for achievingthestatedobjectives policy statements,guidelinesandprocedures properties inthedistrict; the heritageconservationdistrictandof a descriptionoftheheritageattributes district; value orinterestoftheheritageconservation a statementexplainingtheculturalheritage conservation district; in designatingtheareaasaheritage a statementoftheobjectivestobeachieved on.ca/en/heritage/heritage_toolkit.shtml accessed atthefollowinglink:http://www.mtc.gov. prepare astatementofobjectives.Thetoolkitcanbe attributes, determinedistrictboundaries,and plans, identifyculturalheritagevalueand guidance onhowtoconductHCDstudiesand communities. TheOntarioHeritageToolkitprovides identification anddesignationofHCDsintheir Culture andSporttoassistmunicipalitiesinthe document producedbytheMinistryofTourism, The OntarioHeritageToolkitisabestpractice 2.1.1 Ontario HeritageToolkit 2.2 economic prosperity.Policy 1.7.1(c)relatesthe cultural heritageresources, cansupportlongterm character, includingbuilt heritageresourcesand planning andconservingfeaturesthathelpdefine promotion ofwell-designedbuiltform,cultural that encouraginga‘senseofplace’throughthe development andprosperity.Policy1.7.1(d)states The PPSconnectsheritageconservationtoeconomic archaeology. and definitionsrelatingtoculturalheritage property. ChangesinthePPSstrengthenpolicies and wheredevelopmentisproposedonanadjacent archaeological potential,bothonadevelopmentsite landscapes, archaeologicalresourcesandareasof for theprotectionofbuiltheritage,culturalheritage Like PPS2005,theprovidesspecificdirection these (togetherwithother)resources. considered tobedependentontheprotectionof environmental health,andsocialwell-beingare Ontario’s long-termeconomicprosperity, and safetyefficientresilientdevelopment. other provincialinterests,includingpublichealth interests) beconservedalongsidethepursuitof archaeological resources(identifiedaskeyprovincial The PPSrequiresthatculturalheritageand 2005 (PPS2005). date. ItreplacestheProvincialPolicyStatement, applies toplanningdecisionsmadeonorafterthat to eachsituation.ItiseffectiveApril30,2014and be readinitsentiretywithrelevantpoliciesapplied consistent withthePPS.ThePPSisintendedto and provinciallanduseplanningdecisionstobe development. ThePlanningActrequiresmunicipal provincial interestrelatedtolanduseplanningand and itprovidespolicydirectiononmattersof is issuedunderSection3ofthePlanningAct, The ProvincialPolicyStatement,2014(PPS) PROVINCIAL POLICYSTATEMENT property willbeconserved.” that theheritageattributesofprotected on hasbeenevaluatedanditdemonstrated where theproposeddevelopmentandsitealteration adjacent landstoprotectedheritagepropertyexcept shall notpermitdevelopmentandsitealterationon conserved.” Policy2.6.3states“Planningauthorities significant archaeologicalresourceshavebeen resources orareasofarchaeologicalpotentialunless be permittedonlandscontainingarchaeological states “developmentandsitealterationshallnot landscapes shallbeconserved.”Policy2.6.2 resources andsignificantculturalheritage Policy 2.6.1states“Significantbuiltheritage place-making. of builtheritageresourcesindefiningcharacterand cultural planning,recognizingtheeconomicvalue statements supporturbanheritageconservationand main streetstoeconomicdevelopment.Bothpolicy maintenance andenhancementofdowntowns 21

Legislative And Policy Framework | King-Spadina HCD Plan 22 Legislative And Policy Framework | King-Spadina HCD Plan City Of Toronto June 2017 assessed throughaHeritage ImpactAssessment. changes mayberequired tobedescribedand with respectiveHCDplans. Theimpactsofthese attributes, andthattheybe retainedinaccordance integrity ofthedistricts’cultural heritagevaluesand public workswithinoradjacenttoHCDsensurethe that proposedalterations,developmentand/or The revised2015OPpolicies(OPA199)require conform toanyapplicableHCDplan(3.1.5.21.e): heritage building,itrequiresthatnewdevelopment Mixed-Use Areasforalotcontainingconserved area (GFA)forlandsdesignatedRegenerationor While theOPpoliciespermitadditionalgrossfloor Section 3.1.5(3): designation ofHCDsandtheauthorityOHAin The CityofTorontoOfficialPlan(OP)addressesthe 2.3 21) 3) e) that: that ispartofanewdevelopmentprovided structure onadesignatedheritageproperty Neighbourhoods foraheritagebuildingor Areas, InstitutionalAreasorApartment Areas, RegenerationEmployment By-law forlandsdesignatedMixedUse in excessofwhatispermittedtheZoning Additional grossfloorareamaybepermitted Heritage Register. Ontario HeritageActand/orincludedonthe protected bybeingdesignatedunderthe sites thatarepubliclyknownwillbe Conservation Districtsandarchaeological or interestproperties,includingHeritage Heritage propertiesofculturalheritagevalue OFFICIAL PLAN guidelines forthatdistrict. Conservation Districtplanand/orany development conformstotheHeritage Conservation District,theproposed where thepropertyiswithinaHeritage with adjacentheritageresources.” them andensuringnewbuildingsarecompatible identifying importantheritageresources,conserving new developmentwillinclude“…aheritagestrategy states thattherelevantSecondaryPlantoguide In Section4.7RegenerationAreas,policy4.7.2.e section statesinpartthat: commercial heritageconservationdistricts.This within theCity,includingretaildevelopmentand Section 3.5.3oftheOPaddressesretailactivity not limitedto: approach fortheareawithobjectivesincludingbut and thepublicrealm.Itintroducedanewplanning to builtform,heritage,areasofspecialidentity, characteristics andqualitiesthroughspecialattention emphasized reinforcementofthearea’sexisting The firstKing-SpadinaSecondaryPlan(1996) 2.3.1 c) b) a) King-Spadina SecondaryPlan heritage conservationdistrictplan. considerations, andconsistentwiththe commercial unitsizebasedontheforegoing must provideforamaximumstoreor floor commercialretailusesinnewbuildings character, thezoningregulationsforground important featureofthedistrict’sheritage where theprevailingfloorplatesizeisan In commercialheritageconservationdistricts buildings retaining, restoring,and re-using heritage employment area recognizing KingSpadinaasanimportant providing foramixtureoflanduses considerations: revised SecondaryPlanwilladdressthefollowing while accommodatingpositivegrowth.The approach andmaintainalivablemixedusearea with acontextuallyandhistoricallysensitive will updatethepoliciestomanagedevelopment proposed revisedKingSpadinaSecondaryPlan Building onthesuccessof1996Plan, forward in2017. a revisedSecondaryPlanexpectedtobebrought are beingmadetothe1996SecondaryPlan,with an estimated50,000jobs. Asaresult,revisions Spadina andtheareawillaccommodatespacefor plan. Anestimated50,000peoplewillliveinKing that wasnotanticipatedbytheoriginalsecondary the downtownandisexperiencingalevelofgrowth King Spadinaisoneofthehighestgrowthareasin King SpadinaSecondaryPlanReview heritage properties. employment uses,andalargeconcentrationof and residentialuses,alargeconcentrationof use mixincludingoffice,cultural,retail,commercial As aresult,KingSpadinacurrentlyhasdiverseland − − − − − − Implementation Built form Land use Public realm Community infrastructure Heritage and conservestheArea’s heritageitscharacter. and improvesthislivablemixeduseneighbourhood, protects andpromotesemploymentuse,maintains contextually andhistoricallysensitiveapproachthat and investmentintheSecondaryPlanAreawitha guide, andshapepublicprivatedevelopment strong heritagecharacterofthearea.Itwillmanage, infrastructure, andmorecarefullyrespondstothe supported byhardinfrastructureandcommunity that positivelycontributestoliveability,isbetter and change,thatitmustdosoinaway also recognizethattheareawillcontinuetogrow The revisedKingSpadinaSecondaryPlanwill objectives forKingSpadina. Plan willreinforcetheoriginal1996Secondary development. Accordingly,therevisedSecondary periods ofToronto’shistoricalandeconomic block connectionsassociatedwithseveral and adistinctivenetworkoflanewaysmid- buildings, historicopenspaces,views,landscapes, 19th and20thcenturyresidentialcommercial City thatcontainsaconcentrationofsignificant to bealiveablemixeduseneighbourhoodinthe also recognizethatKing-Spadinatodaycontinues employment. TherevisedSecondaryPlanwill range andmixofusesincludingresidential (non-residential uses)intoanareawithadiverse the areahasevolvedfromanofemployment The revisedSecondaryPlanwillrecognizethat 23

Legislative And Policy Framework | King-Spadina HCD Plan 24 Legislative And Policy Framework | King-Spadina HCD Plan City Of Toronto June 2017 of HCDsinToronto. The King-SpadinaHCDPlanmeetstherequirements section requiresanHCDPlanto: requirements setoutinSection41.1(5).This 2 –AppendixAofHCDsinTorontoaddressOHA Policies 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16andSection ways: OHA forthecreationofanHCDPlaninfollowing HCDs inTorontoaddressestherequirementsof for thestudyingandplanningofHCDsincity. to theOHAandprovideaconsistentapproach March 6,2012.Itwasdevelopedtoreflectchanges in Toronto)wasadoptedbyTorontoCityCouncilon Procedure, PoliciesandTermsofReference(HCDs Heritage ConservationDistrictsinToronto: 2.3.2 − − − − Terms ofReference Toronto: Procedures,Policiesand Heritage ConservationDistrictsin without obtainingapermit that thepropertyownermaycarryout Describe alterationsorclassesof objectives oftheHCD and proceduresforachievingthestated Create policystatements,guidelines district andthepropertieswithinit Explain theculturalheritagevalueof as anHCD State theobjectivesofdesignatingarea Toronto. conservation ofheritageresourceswithintheCity framework fortheplanning,stewardshipand by TorontoCityCouncilin2008astheofficial The StandardsandGuidelineswereadopted HCD…”. generally applytoindividualpropertieswithinan to anyinterventionstheHCDasawholeandwill Conservation ofHistoricPlacesinCanadawillapply HCD PlanandtheStandardsGuidelinesfor addition, Policy10ofHCDsinTorontostates,“the consistent withtheStandardsandGuidelines.In City’s HeritageRegisterbeconservedandmaintained guidance document,requiringthatpropertiesonthe references theStandardsandGuidelinesasakey treatments andapproaches.Toronto’sOfficialPlan is thebenchmarkforrecommendingconservation Historic PlacesinCanada(StandardsandGuidelines) The StandardsandGuidelinesfortheConservationof 2.3.3 Canada Conservation ofHistoricPlacesin Standards andGuidelinesforthe include: exceed themaximumpermittedheight.These a buildingonheritagesitemaybepermittedto Section 50.10.40.10(2)outlinesprovisionsbywhich provisions, themorerestrictiveconditionapplies. conserved heritagebuilding.Betweentheselasttwo a minimumof3metresfromthestreetwall heritage building,thatadditionmustbesetback construction exceedstheheightofaconserved minimum of3metresfromthelotline.Wherenew a 20metrestreetwallheightmustbesetback all properties,theportionofabuildingexceeding is measuredfromthecentrelineoflane.For line abutsalane,the7.5metresetbackdistance building beyonda25metredepth.Wherelot or rearlotlineis7.5metres,forthatportionofa zone. Therequiredminimumsetbackfromaside Section 50.10.40.70regulatessetbacksintheCRE with certainsite-specificexceptions. predominant heightlimitisamaximumof30metres height of39metres.EastSpadinaAvenue,the The majorityofSpadinaAvenuehasamaximum for sitesonthenorthsideofFrontStreetWest. along BathurstStreetandamaximumof30metres height limitis23metres,toamaximumof26metres limits. WestofSpadinaAvenue,thepredominant and regulatesbuiltformratherthansettingdensity of residential,commercialandemploymentuses, in mostcases.Thecategorypermitsabroadrange replaces thepreviousReinvestmentArea(RA)zoning covers themajorityofKing-Spadinaarea,and Commercial-Residential-Employment (CRE)zoning 2.4.1 2.4 − City-wide ZoningBy-law569-2013 for conservationofthebuilding; allowing theincreaseinheight inexchange The presenceofaSection 37agreement Zoning By-laws main wallofthebuildingisrequired. applicable, aminimum3metresetbackfromthe discussed below,whereapplicable.Wherenot angular planerequirementsofSection12(2)260 Any additionalbuildingvolumeissubjecttothe − − following conservationscenarios: exceed avaluecalculatedforeachofthe The additionalbuildingvolumemustnot permitted maximumheight; A maximumheightincreaseof20%the o o o o on thesamelot. the adjacentbuildingsorstructures the conservedheritagebuildingand Above-ground separationbetween portion oftheheritagebuilding; Construction aboveaconserved building; No constructionabovetheheritage facing astreetisconserved; The façadeoftheheritagebuilding 25

Legislative And Policy Framework | King-Spadina HCD Plan 26 Legislative And Policy Framework | King-Spadina HCD Plan City Of Toronto June 2017 follows: plane regulationsaboveacertainbaseheightas Study Area,thisrestrictiveexceptionsetsoutangular Toronto ZoningBy-law438-86.WithintheHCD Section 12(2)260carriedoverfromformerCityof use provisions.Themostnotableistheprevailing Many ofthesepertaintoparticulardevelopmentsor a numberofsite-andarea-specificexceptions. Within theCREzoneofKing-Spadina,thereare West Wellington Street King StreetWest Spadina Avenue south side,eastof south side,west south side,west Street of Spadina of Spadina Spadina Base Height from which at LotLine measured 29 metres 18 metres 20 metres 16 metres plane is angular Angle 44° 30° 44° 44° 5) 4) 3) 2) 1) in thezoningmap.Theseare: amended, applies,whicharerepresentedbya“hole” former CityofTorontozoningby-law438-86,as are alsoanumberofpropertiestowhichonlythe applicable wherethereisaconflict.However, are ineffect,withthemorestringentoftwobeing both thenewandpreviouszoningby-laws(below) such, forthepurposeofissuingbuildingpermits, under appealattheOntarioMunicipalBoard.As At thetimeofwriting,zoningby-law569-2013was been issued. enactment forwhichabuildingpermithasnot By-law Amendmentsubmittedbeforethedateof Sites withacompleteapplicationforZoning a buildingpermit By-law’s dateofpassage,buthasnotresultedin Plan ApprovalsubmittedbeforethenewZoning Properties withacompleteapplicationforSite a previousplanningstudy by-laws thatarecomprehensiveand/orbasedon Lands currentlygovernedbyarea-specificzoning of by-lawenactment) Official Planamendmentstudyareas(atthetime Sites withinSecondaryPlanandarea-specific comply withtheOfficialPlan Properties wherethecurrentzoningdoesnot described inSection3.4.1 above.WhereSection plane requirementssetout inSection12(2)260, envelope tobesetbackaccording totheangular requires additionalbuildingvolumeoftheheritage exceed theheightofthatstreetwall.Subsection5 streetwall ofaheritagebuildingonthesamelotmay that nopartofabuildingwithin3metresthe buildings, Section7(3)PartII,subsection4states Tomaintainthevisualprominenceofheritage limit, foreachtypeofconservationlistedbelow: building volumepermittedbeyondthezoningheight regulate the“heritageenvelope”ofadditional Subsections II.(i)A–D–Includesprovisionsto building onthesamelot. height inexchangeforpreservationofheritage the lotentersintoagreementthatpermitsadditional limits onlotswithheritagebuildingsiftheownerof and statesthatnewbuildingscanonlyexceedheight 7(3) PartIreferstoheritagebuildingsinRAdistricts regulations toaddressheritageresources.Section office, warehouse,industrial-itincludesdetailed CS&F, retail/service,entertainment/restaurants, respect tolanduse–includingresidential,parks, provisions. Thoughitisbroadlypermissivewith density limitsbutinsteadfocusesonbuiltform The ReinvestmentArea(RA)zonedoesnotinclude 2.4.2 d) c) b) a) Zoning By-law438-86RA to aheritagebuilding additional buildingvolumeforspaceadjacent new constructionsetback;and The conservationofheritagebuildingwith building; The conservationofaportiontheheritage The conservationoffacades; except inapartywallsituation. highest storeylocatedbelowtheheritageenvelope, minimum of3metresfromanyexteriorwallthe 12 (2)260doesnotapply,thesetbackmustbea 27

Legislative And Policy Framework | King-Spadina HCD Plan 28 Legislative And Policy Framework | King-Spadina HCD Plan City Of Toronto June 2017 categories: buildings) anddesignguidelineswithinthefollowing Important Characteristics(includingspecifichistoric For eachareatheDesignGuidelinesidentifyexisting Andrew’s Playground. Squares); VictoriaSquare;DraperStreet;andSt. Wellington Street(betweenClarenceandVictoria King-Spadina SecondaryPlan:ClarenceSquare; for theAreasofSpecialIdentityidentifiedin The UrbanDesignGuidelinesprovidedirection Areas ofSpecialIdentity facades. reference thearticulationofhistoricbuilding to thewidthofstreet,anddevelopmentshould base ofthebuildingshouldrespondproportionally character andscaleoftheexistingstreetwall, property line.Newdevelopmentshouldreinforcethe such ascornices,rooflines,andsetbacksfromthe step backs,,andshouldrelatetokeyelements through appropriatemassing,height,setbacksand is compatiblewithadjacentheritagebuildings Guidelines seektoensurethatnewdevelopment detail aboutspecificcharacterelementsofthearea. to theKing-SpadinaSecondaryPlan,addingmore proposed development.Theguidelinescorrespond King-Spadina andprovideaframeworkforreviewing Area reinforcethephysicalcharacterandidentityof The UrbanDesignGuidelinesfortheKing-Spadina 2.5.1 2.5 − − − Spadina Area Urban DesignGuidelines:King- Setback Pedestrian Routes General SitePlanIssues APPLICABLE GUIDELINES AND PLANS Spadina Secondary Plan:TheeastsideofBathurstStreet; Special StreetsidentifiedintheKing-Spadina The DesignGuidelinesprovidedirectionforthe Guidelines in2006. City CounciladoptedtheKing-SpadinaUrbanDesign categories: of designguidelinesaccordingtothefollowing identify theexistingconditionsandapplyaset For eachSpecialStreet,theDesignGuidelines and BathurstStreets). John Street);andFrontStreetWest(between Peter andDuncanStreets;KingStreetWest(westof − − − − − − − − − − − Special Streets Address andGradeRelatedUses Streetscape Height andMassing Servicing Open Space Height andMassing Grade-Related Uses Open Space Setback General SitePlanIssues Avenue (Queen to Front Streets West); John, the conclusionofStage 2worktoevaluatethe Specific Assessment),but oftenitispossibleat investigation mayberequired (Stage3Site- results ofthetestispositive,moreextensive required (Stage2PropertyAssessment).Ifthe on aproperty,someformoftestexcavationis significant archaeologicalresourcesmaybepresent In caseswheretheStage1studyconfirmsthat archaeological resourcesmaystillsurvive. interest orvalueandtopredictthedegreewhich identify specificfeaturesofpotentialarchaeological detailed landusehistoryofthepropertyinorderto and PropertyInspection).Thisbeginswitha process isundertaken(Stage1BackgroundStudy potential, ittriggersanassessmentandevaluation any landsthatincorporateareasofarchaeological Typically, whenredevelopmentisproposedfor potentially discretedeposits. therefore constituteanarrayofoverlappingbut of changesinuse,orassociation,overtimeand of use,whileothersaretheproductavariety periods ofoccupationoralong-termcontinuity complexity, someofwhicharerelatedtosignificant of interrelatedfeaturesconsiderablescaleand Areas (ASAs).Theserepresentconcentrations sites referredtoasArchaeologicallySensitive also identifiesspecificareasofknownarchaeological change thatmayaffectthem.Themanagementplan studied priortoanyformofdevelopmentorlanduse archaeological sitesareadequatelyconsideredand The intentofthemanagementplanistoensurethat through applicationofgenericProvincialcriteria. areas ofarchaeologicalpotentialthanispossible Plan isamoredetailedmeansofidentifyinggeneral The CityofToronto’sArchaeologicalManagement 2.5.2 Management Plan City ofTorontoArchaeological requiring assessmentseeSection10.1. of development/alterationtypesandalterations be reviewedwithinanHCDPlanarea.Foralist applications, butadditionalapplicationtypesmight generally takesplaceinthecontextofdevelopment regulations. Thisoverallassessmentprocess Management Planandapplicableprovincial accordance withtheCityofTorontoArchaeological and regulatoryauthoritiesmustbecarriedoutin agents andcontractors,theplanningapprovals archaeologist, thedevelopmentproponentandtheir requires closeconsultationbetweentheconsulting the mostappropriateformofStage4mitigation interpretation ofthosedata.Theidentification data thathavebeenrecovered(salvaged)andthe by comparativeanalysesofthearchaeological monitoring andexcavationworkonsiteisfollowed combination oftheseapproaches.Archaeological salvage andrecordingpriortoconstruction,orsome construction orextensivearchaeologicalexcavation, remains, archaeologicalmonitoringduring and designmeasurestoavoidthearchaeological Mitigation strategiesmayconsistofplanning or soildisturbance. negative effectsoftheproposedredevelopmentand/ Development Impactstominimizeoroffsetthe and todevelopanyrequiredStage4Mitigationof cultural heritagevalueofthearchaeologicalremains 29

Legislative And Policy Framework | King-Spadina HCD Plan

3.0 Statement ofObjectives 31 LegislativeStatement and Policy of Framework Objectives | King-Spadina HCD Plan STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES

The overall objective for the King-Spadina HCD is 1. Conserve, maintain, and enhance the cultural the protection, conservation and management of its heritage value of the District as expressed heritage attributes and contributing properties so through its heritage attributes, contributing that the District’s cultural heritage value is protected properties, building typologies, character in the long-term. The cultural heritage value of the sub-areas, public realm and archaeological District consists of its historic, design, contextual, resources. social and community values. The heritage attributes of the District include its built form, public realm and 2. Conserve the legibility of the District’s period archaeological resources. of significance, particularly the early phase of residential development, and the later Specific objectives of this Plan are set out below. commercial phase of development. Statement of Objectives | Garden District Hcd Plan Although the following objectives are numbered, 3. Conserve the historic form and scale of the the numeric sequence does not establish a priority District’s building typologies. among the objectives. 4. Conserve and enhance contributing properties, Part IV designated properties, listed properties and National Historic Sites. 5. Conserve and enhance the historic scale and public realm of the Spadina Avenue Character Sub-Area, and its significance as a formal boulevard and major artery within Toronto. 6. Conserve and enhance the historic scale and mixed-use character of the St. Andrew Character Sub-Area, including its fine-grained streetscape and rows of contributing Residential properties that reflect its history as a residential neighbourhood. 7. Conserve and enhance the commercial and manufacturing character of the Duncan Street Character Sub-Area as a representative example of the District’s warehouse and manufacturing area history, reflected by its collection of contributing Commercial Detached properties. City Of Toronto June 2017 32 8. Conserve and enhance the Wellington 15. Conserve Clarence Square, Victoria Memorial Place Character Sub-Area as a unique civic Square and St. Andrew’s Playground, and their composition dating from the 1837 Hawkins relationships to adjacent contributing properties. Plan, reflecting the District’s evolution from a residential neighbourhood to a commercial and 16. Conserve and enhance the social, cultural and manufacturing area and reflected in the setback community values of the District as a mixed-use of contributing properties, their historic scale, area through the adaptive reuse of contributing and the two public parks, Clarence Square and properties to facilitate a range of uses, including Victoria Memorial Square, linked by Wellington commercial, cultural and community-based Street West. activities. Statement of Objectives | King-Spadina HCD Plan 9. Ensure complementary alterations to 17. Ensure new development and alterations contributing properties and prevent the adjacent to the District conserve the District’s removal of heritage attributes from contributing cultural heritage value. properties within the District. 10. Ensure that new development and additions conserve and enhance the cultural heritage value of the District in general, as well as the character sub-area in which it is located, particularly with respect to historic scale, public realm and the general pattern of the built form. 11. Ensure that archaeological resources are conserved. 12. Encourage high quality architecture that is of its time and ensure that new development and additions are complementary to the District’s cultural heritage value. 13. Conserve and enhance the District’s network of laneways, both public and private, to support an understanding of their historic and contemporary uses. 14. Conserve and enhance identified views that contribute to an understanding of the District’s cultural heritage value.

33

4.0 District Significance 4.3 HeritageAttributes 4.2 4.1 Statement ofCulturalHeritageValue Description ofHistoricPlace 35 District Significance | King-Spadina HCD Plan 36 City Of Toronto District Significance | King-Spadina HCD Plan June 2017 the north. Queen StreetWestHeritageConservationDistrictto Heritage ConservationDistricttothesouthand Canada. TheDistrictisadjacenttotheDraperStreet is partoftheFortYorkNationalHistoricSite Site ofCanadaandVictoriaMemorialSquarewhich Royal AlexandraTheatrewhichisaNationalHistoric easement agreements.TheDistrictincludesthe OHA, and4propertiesthataresubjecttoheritage with theintentiontodesignateunderPartIVof designated underPartIVoftheOHA,17properties listed ontheCity’sHeritageRegister,55properties Conservation Districtcontained73properties As ofMay2017,theKing-SpadinaHeritage District. Street Westaretheprimaryeast-westroutesin while Richmond,Adelaide,KingandWellington Bathurst Streetserveasthenorth-southarteries, and St.Andrew’sPlayground.SpadinaAvenue parks –ClarenceSquare,VictoriaMemorialSquare over 500propertiesandincludesthreeCity-owned to thewest.TheDistrictisavibrantareacontaining King StreetWesttothesouthandBathurst the north,SimcoeStreettoeast,Wellingtonand core roughlyboundedbyRichmondStreetWestto a 45-hectareareainthesouthwestofdowntown The King-SpadinaHeritageConservationDistrictis 4.1 DESCRIPTIONOFHISTORICPLACE integrating itintothegrowing city. period ofsignificance,revitalizing theDistrictand the commercialbuildings constructedduringthe 20th centuryiscreditedwithfindingnewusesfor the Districtthatoccurredinlatterhalfof a generalperiodofdecline.Theregeneration an endtotheDistrict’speriodofsignificanceand businesses relocatedtosuburbanlocations,marking many oftheDistrict’scommercialandmanufacturing residential properties.FollowingWorldWarII(1945) reflect theconsolidationandredevelopmentofearlier buildings areoftenthefirstuseofproperty,or of Torontoandmajoremployer.Thesecommercial manufacturing was a key economic sector for the city primarily datefromthe1900s–1940swhen The commercialbuildingswithintheDistrict Buildings). uses (includingthesecondProvincialParliament west ofthe(Old)TownYorkforinstitutional the openingofpartMilitaryReserve wave ofdevelopmentwithintheDistrictfollowing reflective ofthefirstusepropertyand residential buildingsdatingfrom1880–1900,often commercial buildingtypologies.TheDistrictretains that ischaracteristicoftheDistrict’sresidentialand in greatnumber,resultingthestylisticvariety architectural stylesarrivedinquicksuccessionand significance (1880s-1940s)bothnewandrevival of the20thcentury.DuringDistrict’speriod of industrialandmanufacturinggrowthattheturn most prominentlyareflectionofToronto’speriod historical andeconomicdevelopment,butare are associatedwithseveralperiodsofToronto’s network oflaneways.Thesehistoricresources buildings, aswell3publicparksandadistinctive to mid-20thcenturyresidentialandcommercial contains aconcentrationoflate19thandearly The King-SpadinaHeritageConservationDistrict 4.2 HERITAGE VALUE STATEMENT OFCULTURAL demolished andconsolidated. properties wereconverted forlightindustrialuse, at whichtimemanyoftheDistrict’sresidential was associatedwithmanufacturingandindustry, survived thesecondwaveofdevelopment,which Reserve. Thoseresidentialpropertiesthatremain Peter StreetfollowingthedissolutionofMilitary first waveofdevelopmentwithintheDistrictwest of These residentialpropertiesarerepresentativeof the of therailwaystoToronto’swaterfrontin1850s. of residentialdevelopmentthatfollowedthearrival historic value,whichrelatetotheDistrict’speriod The District’sresidentialpropertiescontributetoits surveyed. Brock Street),andPortlandBrantStreetswere West wereextendedwestofSpadinaAvenue(then It wasalsoatthistimethatKingandAdelaideStreet and containingSt.Mary’sRomanCatholicChurch). aside forachurch(nowknownasPortugalSquare Playground, andMcDonnellSquare,whichwasset promenade ofWellingtonStreetWest),St.Andrew’s Square andClarence(linkedbythewide this periodofexpansionincludeVictoriaMemorial extant. Remainingfeaturesofthepublicrealmfrom blocks andpublicspaces,manyofwhichremain William Hawkins(1837)whichlaidoutstreets, for developmentbasedonplansbyDeputySurveyor dissolved, theformerreserveareawasopenedup Town ofYork.AftertheMilitaryReserve was growing Military Reserveinthe1830stoaccommodate structures areassociatedwiththedissolutionof early historyasitsinitialdevelopmentandearliest and children.TheDistrictretainsaconnectiontothis Reserve andburialgroundforsoldiers,theirwives Peter andBathurstStreetservedastheMilitary association withFortYork,whentheareabetween The District’shistoricvalueisevidentinits the Districtrepresentavariety ofarchitecturalstyles. commercial buildings.Residential propertieswithin of late-19thandearly-20th centuryresidentialand The District’sdesignvalueisseeninitscollection properties. range ofresidential,commercialandinstitutional re-defining theDistrictasamixed-useareawith reuse andretentionofheritagepropertiesby upon theDistrict,bothbyencouragingadaptive regeneration policieshashadasignificantimpact character. Theunprecedentedsuccessofthe development toreinforcethearea’shistoric of buildingsandencouragingcontextualnew resources aswell,supportingtheconservation recognized andvaluedtheDistrict’sheritage residential uses.Thisnewplanningframework permitted arangeofcommercial,culturaland approach toplanninginthedowntowncorethat to theDistricts’historicvalueasitsignalledanew King-Spadina SecondaryPlan(1996)contributes of theplanningpolicyframeworksetoutin within thedistrictfollowingimplementation The regenerationandreinvestmentthatoccurred West. Governor’s residence(demolished)onKingStreet Theatre in1906-7directlyacrossfromtheLieutenant District wastheconstructionofRoyalAlexandra to thedevelopingmanufacturingactivityin Camden Street(1950-1955).Onenotableexception (1900-1920), SpadinaAvenue(1900-1945),and primarily, butnotexclusively,alongKingStreetWest Street. Manufacturingandlightindustrydeveloped located eastoftheDistrict,aroundFrontandBay of 1904whichdestroyedthemanufacturingarea its historicvalue,particularlyaftertheGreatFire during theearly-20thcenturyfurthercontributeto the roleitplayedinToronto’seconomicprosperity The District’sassociationwithmanufacturingand 37

District Significance | King-Spadina HCD Plan 38 City Of Toronto District Significance | King-Spadina HCD Plan June 2017 commercial warehousebuildings. TheDistrict’s for thefutureadaptivereuse oftheDistrict’s the vitalityofneighbourhood, andsetaprecedent and restaurantuseswasanimportantstatementin of adjacentcommercialbuildingsforentertainment Mirvish in1963andthesubsequentredevelopment refurbishment oftheRoyalAlexandraTheatrebyEd to theDistrict’ssocialandcommunityvalue.The sites inToronto’ssuburbsandabroad,contributes left King-Spadinaforlargerandlessexpensive which peakedinthe1970s,whenmanufacturers of manufacturingthatbeganinthe1950sand The District’sresiliencytothechanginglandscape properties. District andcomplementtheadjacentcontributing and lanewaysthatreflecttheevolutionof juxtaposition ofresidentialandcommercialstreets and manufacturinguses,resultinginaunique the areatransitionedfromresidentialtocommercial the networkofstreetsandlanewayswasmodifiedas Hawkins Plan.Throughouttheperiodofsignificance development, someofwhichdatetothe1837 the District’speriodsofresidentialandcommercial laneways contributetoitsdesignvalue,reflectiveof The District’sinterrelatednetworkofstreetsand District’s commercialwarehousedesigncharacter. and additionshavegenerallycontributedtothe buildings atstreetlevel,whilesmallerinfillprojects complement thedesignofDistrict’scommercial condominiums) hasgenerallysoughttoreflectand Century Modern.Recentdevelopment(primarily Renaissance Revival,EdwardianClassicalandMid- Commercial, ConservativeRenaissanceRevival, a varietyofarchitecturalstylesaswell,primarily Commercial propertieswithintheDistrictrepresent Empire, QueenAnneandHighVictorianGothic. century, primarilyTorontoBay-n-Gable,Second employed inTorontothelatterhalfof19th areas. the districtcanbeascertained throughthesesub- District’s historyandsense ofplace.Theevolution that, asawhole,define,support andmaintainthe contextual value,containinginterrelatedresources These charactersub-areassupporttheDistrict’s factors thatinfluencedthegrowthofDistrict. realm havebeeninformedbyandreflectmicro- character sub-areaswhosebuiltformandpublic mixed-use resultedinthedevelopmentofdiscrete significance fromprimarilyresidentialtocommercial The evolutionoftheDistrictthroughperiod relocating totheDistrict. a numberofnewculturalvenuesandinstitutions and reinvestmentcontinuedthroughthe2000swith tourists tothearea.Thismixed-userevitalization attracting newtenants,businesses,residentsand back socialandculturalusestothedowntowncore, hub, withaconcentrationofnightclubsbringing development oftheDistrictintoanentertainment District’s commercialpropertiesalsosupportedthe permission andflexiblebuiltforminherenttothe spaces, aswellnewdevelopment..Theplanning into office,retail,institutionalandresidential 20th centurycommercialandresidentialbuildings the Districtbyconverting many ofthe19thandearly- buildings. Asaresult,propertyownerstransformed on theconservationofDistrict’scommercial restrictions, amongothermoves,premisedinpart as a‘ReinvestmentArea’whichrelaxedlanduse new planningframeworkbyidentifyingKing-Spadina policy in1996,whentheCityofTorontoapproveda The District’sresiliencywassupportedbyplanning defined bydisinvestmentinthedowntowncore. ensuring theDistrict’sresiliencyduringaperiod unrelated totheiroriginalmanufacturinguseand permitting innovativeandcreativeadaptations form andinteriorarrangementofitsbuildings, resiliency waslargelysupportedbytheuniquebuilt network oflanewaysdeveloped. intact andlosthistoricbuildingsaroundwhichthe providing opportunitiesfortheinterpretationof contextual valueandsupportasenseofplace, mid-block connections,contributetotheDistrict’s including servicingadjacentbuildingsandproviding of usesthatthenetworklanewaysfacilitates, manufacturing andcommercialuse.Therange evolution oftheDistrictfromresidentialthrough to experienceandunderstandthehistory links thatprovideopportunitiesforpedestrians support its contextual value as tangible and navigable The District’snetworkoflanewaysandstreets West, SpadinaAvenueandDuncanStreet. to St.Mary’sChurch,andalongWellingtonStreet Victoria MemorialSquare,fromAdelaideStreetWest These includeviewsbetweenClarenceSquareand 1837 HawkinsPlanandlatercivicenhancements. the plannedviews,someofwhichdatefrom The District’scontextualvalueisalsosupportedby 39

District Significance | King-Spadina HCD Plan 40 City Of Toronto District Significance | King-Spadina HCD Plan June 2017 − − − − − − − BUILT FORM is expressedbythefollowingheritageattributes: The culturalheritagevalueoftheKing-SpadinaHCD 4.3 and verticalarchitecturalfeatures window openings,bays,rooflines,horizontal metal andwooddetailingarounddoor The predominantuseofbrick,stone,terracotta, contributing properties elevations ofbothresidentialandcommercial and buff),stoneterracottaontheprimary The predominantuseofbrickmasonry(red buildings properties intorow,semi-detachedordetached The organizationofresidentialandcommercial lot setbacksbetweenbuildings The interruptionsinstreetwallsasaresultofside properties thataregenerallysetbackfromstreet lot linesjuxtaposedwithresidentialcontributing contributing propertiesoftenbuilttothefront The irregularstreetwalls,withcommercial commercial contributingproperties historic lotsandverticalarticulationon through acombinationoflongandnarrow The fine-grainedstreetscapepatternachieved commercial contributingproperties commercial contributingpropertieswithmid-rise The juxtapositionoflower-scaleresidentialand HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES − o o o o o o o o o o o o associated heritageattributes: The ResidentialBuildingTypology Historic paintcolours setback fromtherearproperty line Rear elevationsbackingonto laneways, architectural features ashphalt orslatecladdingandstructural Gabled, mansard,andflatroofs,oftenwith division ofunits including hardware,material,glazing,andthe Early ororiginalwindowanddoorfeatures, bargeboard androoflines window openings,porches,railings, The useofwoodtrimarounddoorand polychromatic brick door andwindowopenings,oftenin The useofmasonryornamentationaround porches andbays above streetlevel,withstairs,railings, Entrances raisedaquartertohalfstorey mid-section andtop A generaltripartitedesign,withdefinedbase, generally setbackfromthefrontlotline Primary elevationsfacingthestreet, A general2–3storeyheight and deeplots Rectangularplans,withnarrowfrontages associated stylisticfeatures Victorian Gothicarchitecturalstylesandtheir Second Empire,QueenAnne,andHigh The useoftheTorontoBay-N-Gable, , andits − o o o o o o o o o o o associated heritageattributes: The CommercialBuildingTypology in shape,styleordesign of eachfloor,andwhich may beembellished elevations toexpressthefunctionalpurpose Windows thataredesignedonvisible visible fromthepublicrealm Regular rhythmofwindowsonallelevations above streetlevel Entrances raisedaquartertohalf-storey features Flat roofswithstructuralandarchitectural window alignments,piers,andprojections Vertical articulation,expressedthroughbays, middle andtop A generaltripartitedesign,withdefinedbase, include fenestration are setbackfromsidelotlinesandwhichmay front lotline,withvisiblesideelevationsthat Primary elevationsthatgenerallymeetthe Symmetrical, orderlycomposition A rangeofheightsfrom2–12storeys widths anddepths Square andrectangularplans,withvarying stylistic features architectural styles,andtheirassociated Period RevivalandMid-CenturyModern Edwardian Classical,ArtModerne, Renaissance Revival, The useoftheCommercial,Conservative , andits − − − − − PUBLIC REALM o heritage value support an understanding of the District’s cultural and parks,whichdefineasenseofplace The identifiedviewsofcontributingproperties design andevolutionoftheDistrictovertime an understandingofthehistoricstreetscape,civic parks fromthepublicrealm,whichcontributesto The generalviewofcontributingpropertiesand The District’sarchaeologicalresources a commercialandmanufacturingdistrict evolution oftheDistrictfromaresidentialareato which reflectbothgrandcivicdesignsandthe The variationinthewidthsofright-of-ways, buildings andtothepublicrealm routes andprovideaccesstodaylightbetween historic secondarycirculationandserviceaccess The networkoflaneways,whichreflectthe o o o Wellington StreetWest Commercial propertiesonthenorthsideof inclusive ofthestreetwallcontributing at PortlandStreettoClarenceSquare, The vieweastfromVictoriaMemorialSquare directly onthemasonrywalls Painted signageonsideelevations,often division ofunits including hardware,material,glazing,andthe Early ororiginalwindowanddoorfeatures, The solid-to-voidratioofwindowtowall 41

District Significance | King-Spadina HCD Plan 42 City Of Toronto District Significance | King-Spadina HCD Plan June 2017 − o o o o o cemetery, anditsassociatedheritageattributes: Victoria MemorialSquare o o o o o o and mounted The headstones,whichhave beenconserved Walter SeymourAllward The Warof1812Memorialdesignedby tables Its publicamenities,suchasseatingand four cornersofthepark Its pathwayswhichprovideaccessfromall Wellington, PortlandandNiagaraStreets The grassed,openspaceboundedby Spadina Avenue properties ontheeastandwestsidesof Street Westofthecommercialcontributing The viewnorthonSpadinaAvenuefromKing Duncan Street properties ontheeastandwestsidesof Street Westofthecommercialcontributing The viewnorthfromDuncanStreetandKing and PortlandStreettoSt.Mary’sChurch northeast cornersofAdelaideStreetWest The viewwestfromthesoutheastand Square Square totherowofhousesat5-16Clarence The viewnorthfromthecentreofClarence Square toVictoriaMemorial The viewwestfromthecentreofClarence plantings memorial, mountedheadstones,treesand Square atPortlandStreettotheWarof1812 The viewwestfromVictoriaMemorial , aregistered − − o o o o heritage attributes: St. Andrew’sPlayground,anditsassociated o o o o o o o o o attributes: Clarence Square,anditsassociatedheritage the grassed,openspace the maturedeciduoustreecanopy Brant Street its frontageonAdelaideStreetWestand Its relationshipto505RichmondStreetWest park onSpadinaAvenue Alexander Dunnnearthewestentranceto The provincialplaquecommemorating Its publicamenities,suchasseating Wellington StreetWest(east) Square toSpadinaAvenue(west)and The seriesofaxialpathwaysacrossClarence pathways The grassed,openspacesadjoiningthe The maturedeciduoustreecanopy Its frontageonSpadinaAvenue park buildings adjacenttothenorthsideof Its relationshiptotheresidentialrowof Its intacthistoricboundaries around thenorth,eastandsouthperimeters with roadwaysnamed“ClarenceSquare” Spadina Avenue,whichformsitsboundary, The placementoftheparkoneastside − − − − − − − − St. Andrew's CHARACTER SUB-AREAS St. Andrew'sPlayground the frontlotlines The setbackofresidentialrowpropertiesfrom the networkoflanewaysandundividedblocks. evidenced intheremainingresidentialproperties, The remnantsofthe1837HawkinsPlan,as relationship toSt.Andrew’sPlayground The formerWaterworksbuildingandits relationship totheadjacentschoolyard The formerBrantStreetPublicSchoolandits Richmond StreetWestandAdelaidePlace on PortlandStreet,AdelaideStreetWest, The concentrationofresidentialrowproperties residential propertiesinthewest rise commercialpropertiesintheeasttolow-rise The transitionofhistoricbuildingscalefrommid- properties The general2–5storeyscaleofcontributing o o playground structures its publicamenitiessuchasseatingand Adelaide StreetWestandBrant Its pathways,providingashortcutbetween − − − − − − − Wellington Place Clarence SquareandVictoriaMemorial to theparkedge properties onClarenceSquare,whichcontribute The landscapedfrontyardsoftheresidential between thetwoparks civic designforWellingtonPlaceasaconnection Street West,reflectiveofthegrandGeorgian The wide(46metre)right-of-wayofWellington masonry withstoneorprecastdetailing Thepredominantuseofredandbuffbrick and originaluseasaresidentialpromenade Wellington StreetWest,reflectiveofitshistoric The deepsetbacksofresidentialpropertieson metres anddepthsof65–70 Wellington StreetWest,withfrontagesof15–20 The narrowdeeplotsonthenorthsideof Clarence SquareandStewartStreet West, with2-3storeyresidentialpropertieson Commercial propertiesalongWellingtonStreet The general2-6storeyscaleofcontributing 43

District Significance | King-Spadina HCD Plan 44 City Of Toronto District Significance | King-Spadina HCD Plan June 2017 − − − − − − − Spadina Avenue historic importanceofSpadinaAvenue metres) reflectiveofgrandcivicdesignsandthe The wideright-of-wayonSpadinaAvenue(40.2 the charactersub-area the centreof“GarmentDistrict”anddefine pyramidal roofsthatactasaportallandmarkat penthouse structureswithsteepsloped to twelvestoreystall,cappedwithmasonry Spadina AvenueandAdelaideStreetWest,ten The twolandmarkbuildingsatthecornerof street levelwithformalentrances Distinct tripartitedesign,witharticulatedbasesat elevations articulation andembellishmentofbuilding ground floorheightsexpressedthroughthe Large floor-to-floorheights,withextralarge views The visibilityofsideelevationsinangularstreet right-of-way of-way, withmoststreetwallslowerthanthe The generalratioofstreetwallheighttotheright- visible onallfourelevations setback fromsidepropertylines,withwindows that meetthefrontpropertylinebutaregenerally Commercial detachedpropertieswithstreetwalls − − Duncan Street West to theterminusofDuncanStreetatQueen The viewnorthfromofKingStreetWest from thepublicrealm parapets andcornices,sidewallsvisible floor-to-floor dimensions,rooflineswithdefined strong horizontalarticulationcreatedbyregular defined byageneralheightof4–8storeys, on DuncanStreet,withaconsistentstreetwall The concentrationofcommercialproperties 45

District Significance | King-Spadina HCD Plan

5.0 District Boundary andResources District Boundary 5.7 5.6 Parks 5.5 CharacterSub-Areas 5.4 5.3 5.2 5.1 Archaeological Resources Network ofLaneways Contributing andNon-ContributingProperties Building Typologies District Boundary 47 District Boundary and Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 48 City Of Toronto District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan June 2017 District includes: two districtswerecombined.Theboundaryforthe district. ThroughthecourseofPlanphase HCDs –an‘entertainment’district,anda‘cultural’ Study, itwasrecommendedtoproceedwithtwo Adelaide StreetWest.Attheconclusionof Area toincludebothsidesofBathurstStreetand boundary hasincreasedfromtheinitialStudy of theDistrict’sculturalheritagevalue.The consultation, andtheidentificationrefinement informed bythefindingsofStudy,community The delineationoftheDistrictboundaryhasbeen 5.1 − − − − commercial andmanufacturing area evolution oftheDistrictfrom aresidentialto The networkoflaneways whichspeaktothe open space: civic designoftheDistrictandprovidevalued The District’shistoricparks,whichreflectthe the District’sBuildingTypologies Properties thatcontainbuildingsreflect and culturalheritagevalue to anunderstandingoftheDistrict’sevolution The 4CharacterSub-Areas,whichcontribute DISTRICT BOUNDARY o o o o o St. Andrew’sPlayground Victoria MemorialSquare Clarence Square including twosub-categories: Commercial BuildingTypology, Residential BuildingTypology . . Row Detached 49

District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 5.2 BUILDING TYPOLOGIES

The King-Spadina HCD Study identified two building typologies – Row and Industrial / Commercial buildings.

For the purposes of clarity these typologies were refined during the initial stages of the Plan’s development into distinct groups – Residential, Commercial, Institutional and Public Works and Utilities. As described in the Statement of Cultural Heritage Value, the residential and commercial typologies are the dominant forms for which specific policies and guidelines have been prepared. As a result, the final HCD Plan recognizes two Building Typologies – Residential and Commercial. The Commercial Building Typology was sub-divided into two sub-categories – detached and row.

The naming convention for the Building Typologies is based on the original use of the building that informed its built form.

5.2.1 Residential Building

There are examples of the Residential Building There are similarities of exterior design in the Typology found throughout the District with District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan District Boundary Residential Building Typology. These similarities concentrations along John Street, Widmer Street, include form, defined masonry treatments, door, Clarence Square, Portland Street, Stewart Street and window and bay window design, decorative wood Adelaide Place. These properties generally range trim and well-composed bases, mid-sections in date of construction from 1858-1905. Typical and tops. The roof profiles of these buildings stylistic treatments for these buildings include are distinctive aspects of their form; sometimes, Toronto Bay-n-Gable, Second Empire, Queen Anne there are original shingle treatments at roof and Revival and High Victorian Gothic. While there are gables. Many buildings have raised basements and a few examples of detached residential properties, elaborated entrances with porches and stairs. Most examples of semi-detached and row are more are close to the street and enhance the experience numerous. and appreciation of the streetscape. Residential Building Typology properties are among the oldest in the District, and are very, to somewhat, intact. Where these buildings have survived on their own, conservation of their exterior form, design, material and craftsmanship is very important; when these buildings are adjacent to one another, they demonstrate the continuous nature of the Residential Building Typology.

Representative example of the residential building typology City Of Toronto June 2017 50 51

District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 5.2.2 Commercial Building Commercial properties of the late 19th and early- Commercial Row properties with storefronts along 20th centuries are numerous within the District. King Street West dating from 1858 to 1910 are Early examples are of masonry construction and are significant to the District’s cultural heritage value generally 3 – 4 storeys in height. Later examples and reflect the District’s early commercial “main incorporate modern building techniques such as street” development. They contain important heritage steel and concrete framing and are up to 12 storeys attributes including masonry detailing and colour, tall. These early modern structures have large window placement and shape, and roof profile. windows and large open plan interiors with column Commercial Detached properties date from 1833 structure. Many were outfitted with elevators and through the 1950s. Some are modest, while others fireproofing measures, fire separations, and early were designed to reflect the prestige of the owner sprinkler systems. and/or attract tenants through their scale, massing, District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan District Boundary The Commercial Building Typology includes form, architectural design and craftsmanship. The storefront, warehouse, manufacturing and office stylistic influences range from Second Empire, buildings that range in date of construction from Renaissance Revival, Edwardian Classical, Queen 1833 to the 1950s. Typical stylistic treatments for Anne, Commercial style, and Art Moderne. The these buildings include Commercial, Conservative conservation of the Commercial Detached properties Renaissance Revival, Renaissance Revival, within the District as whole buildings, including their Edwardian Classical and Mid-Century Modern. The three-dimensional integrity, is key in ensuring the District also includes examples of Art Moderne, ability to understand their historic use, contribution Period Revival, and Second Empire commercial to the streetscape and the District’s cultural heritage properties. The Commercial Building Typology has value. been categorized based on built form as row or detached.

Representative example of the commercial row building typology Representative example of the commercial detached building typology City Of Toronto June 2017 52 53

District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 54 City Of Toronto District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan June 2017 contributing properties. under PartIVoftheOHAwereidentifiedasnon- not listedontheHeritageRegisterordesignated following theperiodofsignificanceandwhichare properties. Propertiesconstructedpriortoor Part IVoftheOHA,wereidentifiedascontributing listed ontheHeritageRegisteranddesignatedunder the periodofsignificance,aswellallproperties All propertieswithadateofconstructionwithin each propertywasevaluated. the Districtprovidedframeworkagainstwhich design, contextual,socialandcommunityvaluesof of significance(1880sto1940s).Theidentified Statement ofCulturalHeritageValue,andtheperiod District, allpropertieswereevaluatedagainstthe To determinewhichpropertiescontributetothe district.” cultural heritagevalues,characterandintegrityofthe feature ofadistrictthatdoesnotsupporttheoverall is “aproperty,structure,landscapeelementor district.” Anon-contributingproperty,incontrast, heritage values,characterandintegrityofthe HCD thatsupportstheidentifiedsignificantculture structure, landscapeelementorotherfeatureofan A contributingpropertyisdefinedas“aproperty, must beappliedtocontributingproperties. recognize thatahigherstandardofconservation the policiesandguidelineswithinPlan,which value. Thisclassificationprovidesthebasisfor non-contributing totheDistrict’sculturalheritage has beenclassifiedaseitherbeingcontributingor in accordancewith Part VoftheOHA.ForpurposesthisPlanand All propertieswithintheDistrictaredesignatedunder 5.3 PROPERTIES CONTRIBUTING &NON-CONTRIBUTING HCDs inToronto,eachproperty neighbouring propertiesandtheDistrictasawhole. to significantlyimpacttheheritagecharacterof contributing propertiesgivesthemthepotential their proximitytoandevolutionalongside contribute totheheritagecharacterofDistrict, While non-contributingpropertiesdonotindividually individually todetermine: Non-contributing propertieswereevaluated determine: contributing propertieswereevaluatedindividuallyto After thispreliminaryassessment,theidentified contribution for eachcontributingproperty. C andE.AppendixDcontains thestatementof Contributing Propertiescan befoundinAppendices The IndexofContributing PropertiesandListofNon- guidelines. map andinformthedevelopmentofpolicies of thenetworklanewaysinordertoupdate The reviewalsoincludedresearchandasurvey removed fromtheIndexofContributingProperties. had beendemolished.Theyweresubsequently completed, threepropertiesidentifiedascontributing contributing properties.Sincetheinitialsurveywas necessary andconfirmingtheintegrityof in 2013/2014,updatingpropertyphotoswhere study areaagainstthesurveyworkcompleted In August2016,CityStaffre-examinedthe 5.3.1 − − − Field SurveyReview Cultural HeritageValue significance thatsupportedtheStatementof If therewerepropertiesoutsidetheperiodof Statement ofCulturalHeritageValue compromised, nolongersupportingthe whether theirintegritywassubstantially Cultural HeritageValue whether theysupporttheStatementof 55

District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 5.4 NETWORK OF LANEWAYS

The District’s network of laneways reflects both historic and contextual values. As a whole, the network of laneways reflects the evolution of the District from a residential neighbourhood to a commercial and manufacturing area. The network of laneways includes examples of residential laneways that have transitioned to serve commercial service access uses , and are recognized as heritage attributes that reinforce and reflect the District’s gradual change over time. Individual laneways within the network facilitate views between blocks, serve as pedestrian mid-block connections, and provide service access for businesses. The network

District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan District Boundary of laneways also provides variety in the scale of the public realm, in contrast to the grand right-of-way of Spadina Avenue, the main street width of King Street West and the narrow tertiary streets such as Oxley and Pearl Streets.

The value of the network of laneways lies in both the individual laneways, which in their width, alignment and size reflect their historic and existing context, as well as in the network as a whole, which supports to the cohesiveness of the District. This Plan recognizes the importance of ensuring that laneways continue Laneway in King-Spadina, used as a mid-block connection to facilitate service access as well as other activities where appropriate.

Laneway in King-Spadina, adapted for commercial use City Of Toronto June 2017 56 57

District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 58 City Of Toronto District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan June 2017 compatible withandenhancestheirheritagevalue. Sub-Areas, andtoensurenewdevelopmentis specific characteristicsthatdefinetheseCharacter been developedtopayparticularattentionthe Policies andguidelineswithinthisHCDPlanhave the District’sculturalheritagevalue. the District’sintegrity,andwhencombinedconvey to beevidenttoday,howevertheyallcontribute rooted initshistoricalevolutionandwhichcontinues Each CharacterSub-Areahasadistinctcharacter District. and appreciatingtheculturalheritagevalueof periods ofchange,andarecentralinunderstanding been identifiedasbeingrepresentativeofthese Within thedistrictfourCharacterSub-Areashave history. of changeacrossnearlytwocenturiesthecity’s the builtformandpublicrealmillustrateperiods area hasresultedinauniquegeographicwhere neighbourhood toamanufacturingandcommercial The evolutionoftheDistrictfromaresidential 5.5 CHARACTER SUB-AREAS − − − − King-Spadina HCDare: The fourCharacterSub-Areasidentifiedwithinthe Duncan Street Spadina Avenue Wellington Place St. Andrew's 59

District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 60 City Of Toronto District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan June 2017 institutional andpublicproperties suchasthe detached properties,aswell assignificanthistorical of contributingResidential andCommercial historic builtformincludesseveralgenerations south ofRichmondStreetWest.Thesub-area’s West, aswellonMaudandPortlandStreets, Playground onCamdenStreetandAdelaide buildings areprimarilylocatedeastofSt.Andrew’s Residential properties.Contemporarymid-rise properties, aswellrowsof2-2.5storey consists oflow-tomid-riseCommercialDetached The St.Andrew’sCharacterSub-Areagenerally significance (1880s-1940s) from theearliestdecadesofDistrict’speriod to understandtheDistrict’sresidentialhistorydating context oftheDistrictasitprovidesanopportunity This residentialcharacterparticularlyvaluableinthe laneways, smallnarrowlotsandundividedblocks. character intheformofrowhouses,residential development, ithasretainedastrongresidential within theareawereconsolidatedforcommercial Although manyoftheresidentialproperties and themarketwasreplacedbyapublicutility. 20th century,atwhichpointtheplaygroundwasbuilt underwent significantredevelopmentintheearly service thegrowingresidentialcommunity.Thearea a hall,market,policestationandpubliclibraryto by the1860s,sitehadbeenexpandedtoinclude built in1850onlandallottedforpublicmarketuse; Bathurst Streetby1880.St.Andrew’sMarketwas to SpadinaAvenue,withdevelopmentreaching in the1850sasaresidentialneighbourhoodclose expanding TownofYork.Theareabegantodevelop development inthe1830stoaccommodate within theformerMilitaryReservelands,soldfor The St.Andrew’sCharacterSub-Areaislocated 5.5.1 St. Andrew’s 3-7 AdelaidePlace properties. through theproximityofcontributingResidential residential characterofthesub-area,evidenced sub-area andDistrict,iscloselyrelatedtothe open spacereflectstheevolutionofsurrounding playground’s evolutionfrommarketplacetopublic District thatdatestothe1837HawkinsPlan.The sub-area, andisasignificantpublicspacewithinthe St. Andrew’sPlaygroundisatthecentreof (buff andred),haveextensivefenestration. generally visiblefromfoursides,predominantlybrick size anddateofconstruction,howevertheyare The Commercialpropertiesvaryinscale,floorplate meet thefrontpropertylinewithasolidstreetwall. landscaped frontyards,whileCommercialproperties generally setbackfromthefrontpropertylinewith historic streetscape.Residentialpropertiesare sub-area’s mixed-usecharacter,aswellaunique properties addstothediversityofbuiltformand The closeproximityofresidentialandcommercial waterworks building,andSt.Andrew’sPlayground. Brant StreetPublicSchool,theRichmond 61

District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 5.5.2 Wellington Place The Wellington Place Character Sub-Area primarily consists of low- to mid-rise Commercial properties, The Wellington Place Character Sub-Area is an interspersed with Residential properties, including a important historic landscape within the District, row of extant 1879 row houses on the north side of valued for the interrelationship between built form Clarence Square. Contemporary mid-rise commercial and public realm envisioned in the 1837 Hawkins buildings are generally located north and northeast Plan. The area is bookended by two public parks of Victoria Memorial Square, with mid-rise infill – Victoria Memorial Square and Clarence Square – development on the north side of Wellington Street between which the axial road of Wellington Street West. West was laid out. The mansions that formerly lined Wellington Street West were demolished and Views between Clarence Square and Victoria subdivided for housing and commercial development Memorial Square contribute to the public realm following the construction of nearby rail yards of the sub-area, and are enhanced by the setback through the latter half of the 19th century, resulting of properties on Wellington Street West, the wide District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan District Boundary in a residential public realm adjacent to Commercial sidewalks with landscaped boulevards, and the properties. mature tree canopy of both parks.

Wellington Street West towards Spadina Avenue from Victoria Memorial Park Clarence Square, north side City Of Toronto June 2017 62 Wellington PlaceCharacterSub-Area

BATHURST STREET

Proposed Plan

S

T

E

W

R A

Boundary

T

E E R T S T Wellington PlaceCharacterSub-area

PORTLAND STREET

DRAPER STREET DRAPER

K WELLINGTON

FRONT

G N I

S

S

T

RE T

E R S

ET

T

E BRANT T

W E

R STREET

E W

T E

W

EST

T S

T S E Heritage ConservationDistrict

SPADINA AVENUE

Proposed King-Spadina

C

L

A

R

E N

C

E N June 2017 o t o S Q U A R E CHARLOTTE

S

c STREET al e

C NR C P R P C 63

District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 5.5.3 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue was originally named Brock Street after it was laid out by Dr. William Warren Baldwin as a road to his country estate “Spadina”, located on the escarpment above Davenport Road. At the south end of Spadina Avenue, the street was flanked on the east and west by Clarence Square and Victoria Memorial Square, respectively, which were connected by Wellington Place (later Wellington Street West), with the surrounding neighbourhood attracting high-end residences in the mid-19th century. North of King Street West, Spadina Avenue developed View south on Spadina Avenue from Richmond Street West

District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan District Boundary in the early 20th century as a manufacturing and warehouse corridor that came to be referred to as the “Garment District”, owing to the large number of textile manufacturing and distributing operations that located within the area.

The built form of the Spadina Avenue Character Sub- Area is generally defined by Commercial Detached properties with large floorplates and in a range of architectural styles. Many of these buildings have visible side walls, a defined base, shaft and roofline, and service access through side and rear laneways.

The grand avenue design envisioned by Baldwin is still evident in the public realm, defined by the wide right-of-way with trees and centre median (now a streetcar right-of-way). Wide sidewalks with tree planters separating pedestrians from traffic enhance the pedestrian experience, and support an understanding of the civic design of Spadina Avenue as a major artery within the downtown core.

117 Spadina Avenue City Of Toronto June 2017 64 65

District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 5.5.4 Duncan Street The Duncan Street Character Sub-Area is an intact artery of Commercial Detached properties that reflect the change in use and character of the District from residential and institutional to manufacturing following the Great Fire of 1904.

The largely uninterrupted streetwall on Duncan Street of masonry Commercial Detached properties generally between 5-8 storeys contributes to a defined sense of place. The sub-area’s context is supported by a view north from King Street West to 15 Duncan Street the terminus of Duncan Street at Queen Street West. District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan District Boundary This view supports the sub-area’s contribution to the District’s cultural heritage value as a relatively intact corridor of Commercial Detached properties, and is enhanced by the strong streetwall and horizontal articulation of the sub-area’s contributing properties. Laneways between the buildings provide views of side elevations, and have in some cases been repurposed as pedestrian mid-block connections or outdoor amenity space.

Buildings within the Character Sub-Area vary in architectural style, with most dating from the 11 Duncan Street District’s period of significance. The area contains a few examples of contemporary development that has largely been sympathetic to the historic streetwall and pedestrian experience.

View north on Duncan Street from Pearl Street City Of Toronto June 2017 66 67

District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 68 City Of Toronto District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan June 2017 preserved. Anglican ChurchofSt.John theDivinehasbeen square, andthecornerstone ofthedemolished Seymour Allward)islocatedinthecentreof of 1812(designedbyFrankDarlingandWalter at thepark’swesternedge,amonumenttoWar nature; survivinggravestoneshavebeenmounted restored. Itisalsovaluedforitscommemorative and historicinternalcirculationroutesthathavebeen public amenity,withmaturetrees,permeableedges the squareretainssignificantheritagevalueasa Fort Yorktothesouth.Inspiteofthislossland, Street, disconnectingthecemeteryandsquarefrom subdivision claimedthewesternfrontageonBathurst Street andNiagaraStreet.Bythe1880s,residential bounded byBathurstStreet,PortlandStewart symmetrically alignwithWellingtonStreetWestand envelope thecemetery,expandingopenspaceto proposed apark–VictoriaMemorialSquare-to Plan fortheexpansionofTownYork last burialbeingheldin1863.The1837Hawkins cemetery byJohnGravesSimcoein1793,withits Victoria MemorialSquarewasestablishedasa 5.6.1 intent asamenitiesforlocalandcityresidents as spacesforrecreation,reflectingtheirhistoric with theirlongstandingcommunityandsocialvalue neighbourhood. Theirhistoricvalueisintertwined period andintoitsredevelopmentasamixed-use a residentialneighbourhood,throughitsindustrial of theDistrictfromwhenitwasfirstestablishedas Playground. Theseparksreflectthedevelopment Memorial Square,ClarenceSquareandSt.Andrew’s to theculturalheritagevalueofDistrict–Victoria identified asheritageattributesandwhichcontribute The Districtcontainsthreeparksthathavebeen 5.6 Victoria MemorialSquare PARKS . Memorial Square. Wellington StreetWestandterminatingatVictoria to understandtheoriginaldesignlookingwestalong activities. Fromthecentreofparkitispossible yet continuetofacilitatepublicuseandrecreational circulation pathsthathavebeenalteredovertime, tree canopywithpermeableedgesandinternal roof linesanddetails.Theparkcontainsamature side ofthesquare,whichhaveretainedtheirform, adjacent terrace(row)housinglocatedonthenorth Street. ClarenceSquarecomplementstheremaining included VictoriaMemorialSquareandWellington Hawkins PlanaspartoftheGeorgiancivicplanthat parks indowntownToronto,laidoutthe1837 Clarence Squareisoneoftheoldestremainingpublic 5.6.2 commercial and industrialproperties. were consolidatedanddemolished, replacedby many ofthesurrounding residentialproperties Adelaide Streets.Intheearly tomid20thcentury and toSpadinaAvenuevia Richmond,Camdenand Queen StreetWestbyEsther(laterAugusta) residential frontages.Itwasaxiallyconnectedto surrounded bypublicstreetsandfullydeveloped originally plannedandconstructed,themarketwas Richmond StreetWestwaterworksbuilding.When portion ofthepropertywaslaterdevelopedas continued tooperateassuchsince.Thenorthern installed onthesouthsideofproperty,andhas as suchuntilthe1930s.In1909aplaygroundwas Ward withinwhichitwaslocated–andoperated use asapublicmarket–namedafterSt.Andrew’s community. Thepropertywassetasidein1837for that hassupportedthesurroundingresidential the District,andhasbeenanimportantpublicspace St. Andrew’sPlaygroundisanevolvedsitewithin 5.6.3 Clarence Square St. Andrew’sPlayground Victoria Memorial Square And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan District Boundary

Clarence Square

St. Andrew's Playground

69 70 City Of Toronto District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan June 2017 5.7 a designatedHCD. subject toarchaeologicalplanningcontroloutsideof of grounddisturbancethatmightnototherwisebe staff, priortoactivitiesthatwillresultinsomeform for anarchaeologicalassessmentonthepartofCity archaeological assessment,orreviewoftheneed to thetypesofactivitiesthatwouldlikelyrequirean potential bycategorizingeachpropertyaccording of the135propertiesthatexhibitarchaeological Study andPlanhasrefinedthisapproachforeach Research undertakenfortheKing-SpadinaHCD exhibits archaeologicalpotentialoritdoesnot. on asimple“yes”or“no”basis.Eitherproperty Management Planassignsarchaeologicalpotential In general,theCityofTorontoArchaeological archaeological potential. represent—in wholeorinpart—areasofgeneral Within theKing-SpadinaHCD,135properties 5.7.1 1 4 A S Archaeological Potential Methodology forIdentifying ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES P S - 0 I 3

6 Bathurst St A 4 5

- 1 2 r 6- c

8 K h

9 B a i 6 a e n 6- t o h l g 1 o u

0 F g r

6 s a i r

A 9 t c

o

a n

S

d | l

t n

d r V & F

e e

t 4

e

C l i 1 S t

S a c ul 6-

i p T t t t 9

d ur o

o 6

W a r

e 6- o a r d l n

9 i

S H t a 7 i o e 2 n

t ,

r

3 F

O M i

W a t

N a | o

g e T a H r e A s m

i t R S C h

I e e O Y D r o r

i vi

t o

a r M

c ( g i r e 5 A e a s k S . c r

l 2 a

c P S h 9 q a u e St a tland o Por r l o e g i c a l Arc Ki

P o n t g h e

a n & e t i o a Sp l l o ) a g d i c

i Augusta Ave n a a l

Po

H C

t W e

D e

n l

t l

i i

a n

l g

(G

t

o n

a

S

ri

t

W s o n K -H i n g u

S m t

b W e r Ba y

Se t t l e m Spadina Ave Q

u e

e n

e C t

n

l a C

S

r e e

t

n n

W c t

re

e

R S )

q i

c

h

m

o were completedbetween2006and2010priortothe development. Large-scalearchaeologicalprojects when thereservewassubdividedforresidential and 1858,butwasfinallydemolishedaround1862 used tohousegovernmentofficesbetween1856 The hospitalwasclosedin1854.building frame “feversheds”onthegroundsofhospital. required theconstructionofaroundadozenlarge Accommodating suchlargenumbersofpatients mostly IrishCatholics,wereadmittedtothehospital. of 1847,whenbetween1,200and1,400patients, was thetyphusepidemicinsummerandfall greatest publichealthcrisisthehospitalfaced John toPeterandAdelaideKingstreets.The 1819-1820 withinareservethatextendedfrom the northwestcornerofKingandJohnstreetsin The TorontoGeneralHospitalwasconstructedon 5.7.2

n

d

Bu Arc S

t

W i l h d a i n e g o

l F o

o

g

B l u e

J o a y i s

W a c y Peter St

t Blue Jays Way a p l ri Area Hospital ArchaeologicallySensitive The HCDPlanandtheTorontoGeneral l y n

t Se

W

n T

e

s o

l i

l r t

i

n

i o v

g n e

t t

o

o Are

n

G

S e

t a

n

W

e

r a B

A

l

S H E

:

o s D B a

a p s t u e m

i D

t & a t

a a P :

r hn St Jo

o l C j e i t y c

t o i o f n

T : o

M r o T n M t o

, 3

O D p

N e A n D

D

2 a 7 t a

uncan St A D D W

S ay A Ed Mirvish W I T

e P E R :

l 0

O

l 6

i / J 7

n E / 2 C

g 0 T 1

t 7 N

o O .

n :

1

4

S S P M

t - 0

3 W e 7 t r D F e I R L E A s : W

1 N 4

S B P Y 0 :

3 J

6 F _ K

S 1 _ H 5 ± C D 0 _

J Simcoe St u Lower Simcoe St n e 7 2 0 1 7 attribute oftheDistrict. General HospitalASA,whichisincludedasan Nine propertiesarelocatedwithintheToronto analysis completedforthisHCDPlan. basis ofadditionalarchaeologicalassessmentsand The extentoftheASAhassincebeenreducedon encompassing alllandswithintheformerreserve. Hospital AArchaeologicallySensitiveArea(ASA), this workledtothedefinitionofTorontoGeneral on Adelaide,andtheCinemaTower).Theresultsof hospital reserve(theFestivalTower,thePinnacle redevelopment ofthreepropertieswithintheformer part oftheFortYorkNationalHistoricSite. should benotedthatVictoriaMemorialSquareforms City ofTorontoArchaeologicalManagementPlan.It cemetery, ithasbeendesignatedasanASAbythe remains. Giventheongoingsensitivitiesposedby face impactsinordertoensurenodamageany of allparkinstallationsthatwouldresultinsubsur for theremainsaswellarchaeologicalmonitoring cemetery areainordertoprovidegreaterprotection The revitalizationinvolvedraisingthegradeof little as20cmbelowthegroundsurfaceatthattime. and scatteredhumanremainsweretobefoundas recent revitalizationdemonstratedthathumanburials ment carriedoutwithintheparkinadvanceofits site beforeitwasclosed.Anarchaeologicalassess As manyas400burialsmayhavebeenmadeatthe site hasbeenmaintainedbytheCityasapublicpark. Square occurredin1863,andsincethe1880s for FortYork.ThelastburialinVictoriaMemorial cemetery, openedin1793asthemilitarycemetery Victoria MemorialSquareisToronto’sfirstEuropean 5.7.3 Sensitive Area Memorial SquareArchaeologically The HCDPlanandtheVictoria - - 71

District Boundary And Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan

6.0 Policies andGuidelinesforContributing Properties 6.17 6.16 6.15 6.14 6.13 6.12 6.11 Massing 6.10 6.9 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.5 CodeCompliance 6.4 6.3 6.2 6.1 Signage Lighting Entrances, PorchesandBalconies Exterior Walls Windows andDoors Roofs Alteration Restoration Maintenance Removal andRelocation Demolition Combined Properties Existing PartIVDesignations Conservation Understanding 73 Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan 6.1 UNDERSTANDING

This section contains policies and guidelines Parks Canada’s Standards and Guidelines intended to manage change within the District in provides the basis for the policies and guidelines order to meet the objectives of this Plan. for contributing properties. The Standards and Guidelines has been adopted by the Toronto City The policies (in bold font) describe what is required Council. Its conservation approach established the when undertaking work on a contributing property conservation process – understanding, planning within the District. Policies are required components and intervening. The appropriate conservation of the designating by-law and are not discretionary, treatment should be determined by qualified heritage unless otherwise indicated. professionals depending upon the work proposed.

The guidelines (in regular font) provide suggested 6.1.1 Alterations to a contributing property methods of satisfying associated policies, but do must be based on a firm understanding of the not carry the mandatory weight of policy. Guidelines contributing property and how it contributes recognize that there may be a variety of strategies to the District's cultural heritage value and that could satisfy any given policy. heritage attributes Terms in italics have been defined, and are listed in a. In order to determine appropriate interventions, Appendix A of this Plan. the following should be taken into account:

• Building Typology Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies • Character Sub-Area

• Architectural style

• The intentions and design principles of the original architect or builder

• The changes to the building that have been made over time

• The building’s existing condition

b. The cause of any damage or deterioration of heritage fabric should be determined prior to planning any interventions to determine the appropriate scope of work and to preserve as much of the heritage fabric as possible City Of Toronto June 2017 74 6.2 CONSERVATION

6.1.2 An understanding of the contributing The District’s contributing properties must property shall be determined through be conserved in order ensure the long-term investigation and research to ascertain its conservation of its cultural heritage value. Once evolution over time and contribution to the an understanding of how a contributing property District support’s the District’s cultural heritage value has been established, planning for appropriate 6.1.3 Alterations to a contributing property interventions can occur. The Standards and may be permitted only once the cultural Guidelines identify three conservation treatments heritage value and heritage attributes of the – preservation, rehabilitation and restoration – as District, as expressed through the property, actions and processes aimed at safeguarding the cultural heritage value of a historic place. Additional have been documented and described, and policies relating to the alteration, removal and/or the impact of any proposed alteration on those relocation and demolition of contributing properties cultural heritage values and heritage attributes have been added to this Plan to provide clarity and has been determined direction.

6.1.4 A Heritage Impact Assessment shall be 6.2.1 Contributing properties shall be submitted to the City and shall evaluate the conserved in a manner that ensures the long- impact of any proposed alteration or addition term conservation of the District’s cultural on the contributing property to the satisfaction

heritage value, heritage attributes, and the Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, integrity of the contributing property City Planning a. Record, repair and restore, where possible, deteriorated, lost or removed heritage attributes based on thorough supporting historic documentation and research. If necessary, replace in-kind heritage attributes that are missing or deteriorated beyond repair

b. Maintain contributing properties on an ongoing and regular basis. Adopt a sustainable maintenance plan and regular scheduled inspections to identify necessary maintenance work

c. Stabilize deteriorated heritage attributes as required, until repair work is undertaken. This includes the regular cleaning and repair of damaged materials and monitoring architectural assemblies

75 6.3 EXISTING PART IV DESIGNATIONS 6.4 COMBINED PROPERTIES

All properties within the District are designated under Combined properties include consolidated properties Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. Some properties (combining contributing and non-contributing located within the District are also designated properties), as well as contributing properties under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, which that contain significant vacant space upon which protects the cultural heritage value of individual new development could occur. In both cases, it is properties and their identified heritage attributes. essential that the conservation process be followed These properties are designated by municipal by-law and appropriate conservation treatments be containing a Statement of Significance that defines identified to conserve the contributing property in the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the design of any addition or new development. the individual property. Part IV properties in Toronto are included on the City of Toronto’s Heritage 6.4.1 Alterations to combined properties Register. shall conserve the portion(s) of the property identified ascontributing to the District 6.3.1 In addition to the other requirements of according to Section 6 of this Plan this Plan, properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act shall be conserved 6.4.2 New development on those portions in accordance with their respective Part IV of combined properties identified asnon- designating by-laws contributing shall be consistent with Section 7 of this Plan Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies City Of Toronto June 2017 76 6.5 CODE COMPLIANCE 6.6 DEMOLITION

The principles of minimal intervention and The City of Toronto’s Official Plan requires a Heritage reversibility, as described in Standard 3 of the Impact Assessment for the proposed demolition of a Standards and Guidelines, should be considered property on the City of Toronto’s Heritage Register. when undertaking work related to code compliance. The Heritage Register includes all properties Understanding the intent of the code is essential designated under Part V of the OHA. Article IV of for developing approaches that meet that intent the Municipal Code requires that heritage permit without negatively impacting the cultural heritage applications be submitted for the proposed value and heritage attributes of the District. demolition of any property located in a HCD. The Reviewing alterative compliance strategies and new Property Standards By-Law protects heritage technological solutions is encouraged. properties in HCDs from demolition by neglect. The Municipal Code and the Property Standards By-Law 6.5.1 Upgrades to contributing properties require that the demolition of properties in HCDs that are required to comply with current may only take place in accordance with the OHA, codes pertaining to health, safety, security, and the Official Plan requires that the demolition of accessibility and sustainability shall conserve properties in HCDs be in accordance with respective the District's cultural heritage value and HCD plans. heritage attributes, as well as the integrity of 6.6.1 The demolition of buildings or the contributing property structures on contributing properties shall not be permitted, unless: Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies − The integrity of the contributing property for which the demolition application has been submitted has been lost; and − The loss of integrity of the contributing property is not the result of demolition by neglect, deferred maintenance or purposeful damage to the property a. A peer review of the demolition application may be required at the expense of the applicant, if requested by the City

6.6.2 The demolition and reconstruction of a building on a contributing property shall not be permitted 6.6.3 As per the City of Toronto’s Property Standards By-law, ensure that contributing properties are protected against demolition by neglect

77 6.7 REMOVAL AND RELOCATION 6.8 MAINTENANCE

The City of Toronto’s Official Plan states that Article V (Heritage Property Standards) of the City of buildings or structures located on properties Toronto Property Standards By-Law (Chapter 629 of included on the Heritage Register should be the Municipal Code) specifies minimum standards conserved on their original location, and that their for maintenance and occupancy of Part IV and Part V removal or relocation may only be permitted where designated heritage properties, as well as minimum the removal is supported by the cultural heritage standards for repairing and replacing heritage value and heritage attributes of the property. The attributes in order to ensure that the heritage Official Plan also states that relocation may only character and the visual and structural heritage be permitted where it does not conflict with any integrity of the building or structure is conserved. applicable HCD plans. 6.8.1 Contributing properties shall be In the District, the location of buildings or structures maintained to ensure the conservation and on contributing properties relative to the property integrity of the District’s cultural heritage lines has been identified as a heritage attribute. value and heritage attributes This includes but is not limited to the setback of contributing Residential properties from front lot a. Maintain contributing properties on an lines, the visibility of side walls for contributing ongoing basis, utilizing a regular maintenance Commercial Detached properties, and the consistent program, scheduled inspections and recognized streetwall of contributing Commercial row conservation treatments properties.

Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies b. Stabilize deteriorated heritage attributes as 6.7.1 The removal of buildings or structures required, until repair work is undertaken from a contributing property shall not be c. Clean and repair damaged materials regularly, permitted, unless the building or structure monitoring architectural assemblies for is unrelated to the contributing property's deterioration and when required take corrective Statement of Contribution action as soon as possible

6.7.2 The relocation of a building or structure d. Ensure that all gutters, downspouts, crickets, within a contributing property, intact and eavestroughs and other water shedding excepting its sub-surface foundations, may elements are maintained and clear of debris be permitted if the relocation is a modest adjustment from its existing location and e. Preserve the unique patina of materials, preserves the relationship of the structure’s where it exists and is not contributing to the deterioration of the contributing property built form to the public realm f. Ensure that products and techniques used for maintenance and repairs are compatible with and do not negatively impact the integrity and life-cycle of the contributing property City Of Toronto June 2017 78 6.9 RESTORATION

The Standards and Guidelines defines ‘Restoration’ 6.9.1 The restoration of a contributing as: property shall be based on thorough supporting historic documentation of the property’s built “The action or process of accurately revealing, recovering or representing the state of an form, materials and details from the period to historic place, or of an individual component, as which it is being restored to it appeared at a particular period in its history, 6.9.2 When undertaking a restoration project while protecting its heritage value.” on a contributing property, building features The restoration of a contributing property may be from the period to which a building is being appropriate when the cultural heritage value of the restored that have been removed or damaged property is connected to a specific period in its should be re-instated history, when the removal of components from other periods of the property’s history and the recreation a. Restore where possible deteriorated original or or reinstatement of lost or removed components restored features or heritage attributes based would support the District’s cultural heritage value upon thorough supporting historic research and not negatively impact the integrity of the b. Repair rather than replace damaged or contributing property. Restoration must be based on deteriorated heritage attributes thorough supporting historic documentation of the built form, materials and features being recreated or c. Where the heritage attributes of a contributing reinstated. property are deteriorated beyond repair, ensure Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies replacements are in-kind, conserving the composition, materials, size, finishes, patterns, detailing, tooling, colours and features

6.9.3 The creation of a false historical evolution of the contributing property through the addition or incorporation of components from other places, properties and periods shall not be permitted

79 6.10 ALTERATION

The policies for alterations to contributing properties 6.10.3 Alterations to contributing properties are derived from the Standards and Guidelines, shall include the preservation of the District’s which define ‘Rehabilitation’ as: heritage attributes “The action or process of making possible a a. Preserve rather than replace heritage attributes continuing or compatible contemporary use of an when designing alterations historic place, or an individual component, while protecting its heritage value.” b. Evaluate and document the existing condition of the contributing property including its heritage The objective of the alteration policies is to provide attributes prior to designing alterations the guidance required to manage change on a contributing property to ensure the long-term 6.10.4 The alteration of contributing conservation of its integrity and the District’s cultural properties shall not diminish or detract from heritage value. the integrity of the District or the contributing Alterations to contributing properties may be property proposed in order to ensure the properties’ 6.10.5 A Heritage Impact Assessment shall continued use, to ensure accessibility and to increase be submitted to the City and shall evaluate sustainability. Alterations include rehabilitation and the impact of any proposed alteration to a additions, and should be undertaken in conjunction contributing property to the satisfaction of the

Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies with the preservation of the District’s heritage attributes. Alterations may be supported when they Chief Planner and Executive Director, City meet the objectives, comply with the policies and Planning maintain the intent of the guidelines of this Plan.

6.10.1 The alteration of contributing properties shall be complementary and subordinate to the District’s cultural heritage value and heritage attributes a. Complementary alteration should reference the architecture, materials, features and built form of the contributing property, and the history of the property including changes made over time

6.10.2 New materials shall be physically and visually complementary to the materials of the contributing property City Of Toronto June 2017 80 6.11 MASSING

Massing relates to the exterior form of a building 6.11.1 Additions to contributing properties and its spatial relationship to its immediate context, shall conserve the primary structure’s three- including the space in front, behind, beside and dimensional integrity as seen from the public above the building where visible from the public realm realm. It pertains to the overall proportions of a building or structure, its relationship to adjacent 6.11.2 Additions to contributing properties properties, and its impact on the scale and character shall be designed in a manner which is of their of the streetscape and public realm. Massing is time, complementary to and distinguishable interrelated to the composition of the streetwall, the from the contributing property roof, as well as the architectural expression of the building or structure in its entirety. 6.11.3 Additions to contributing properties shall not be permitted on any street-facing The existing massing in the District varies, reflecting the two Building Typologies that define the District’s elevation historic character – Commercial and Residential a. Additions for the purposes of accessibility, fire properties – as well as contemporary new and life safety and building code requirements development and additions. The close juxtaposition may be permitted where the District’s heritage of historic massing contributes to the District’s attributes are not negatively impacted cultural heritage value and reflects its evolution from a residential neighbourhood to a warehouse and b. Do not enclose entranceways or add balconies or manufacturing area. other features to street-facing elevations Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies The following policies seek to conserve the massing 6.11.4 Additions to the side elevations of of the District’s contributing properties and permit contributing properties shall maintain the complementary additions. This Plan recognizes that visibility of fenestrated side elevations from a range of design approaches may be appropriate to the public realm achieve the objectives of this Plan and conserve the District’s cultural heritage value, based on the scale, a. The design, scale and massing of side additions form and massing of the proposed addition and the should be complementary to and distinguishable contributing property. from the contributing property

b. Physically and/or visually separate side additions from the primary structure through the use of reveals, transparent materials, setbacks, the incorporation of publically-accessible space, or other design methods

81 6.11.5 The streetwall height of side additions 6.11.6 The setback of side additions shall shall match the streetwall height of the primary match the setback of the primary structure on a structure on a contributing property contributing property − Additional height above the streetwall a. Where the primary structure is setback from the must step back. Step back distances will front property line, setback additions the same be determined based upon the design, distance from the front property line to conserve scale and massing of the proposed the visibility of the primary structure from the addition, the contributing property, and public realm other applicable policies b. Minor setbacks for the purposes of accessibility, recessed entranceways and landscaping that do not match the setback of the primary structure may be permitted where it has been determined that the setback will not negatively impact the District’s cultural heritage value Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies City Of Toronto June 2017 82 6.11.7 Cantilevered portions of additions to contributing properties shall not be permitted above any required step back or setback 6.11.8 Additions shall be designed to maintain the primary horizontal and vertical articulation of the primary structure on a contributing property a. Floor-to-floor dimensions, cornice lines and bays of the contributing property as well as adjacent contributing properties should inform and guide the horizontal and vertical articulation of additions

Commercial Row Building Typology 6.11.11 Additions to contributing Commercial Row properties shall step back a minimum of 10 metres from all elevations facing the public Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies realm

83 Commercial Detached Building Typology 6.11.9 Additions to contributing Commercial 6.11.10 Additions to contributing Commercial Detached properties shall only be permitted Detached properties shall step back from when the proposed addition conserves the all elevations of the primary structure, whole building notwithstanding elevations that are blank − Step back distances will be determined based upon the design, scale and massing of the proposed addition, the contributing property, and other applicable policies Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies City Of Toronto June 2017 84 Residential Building Typology 6.11.12 Rooftop additions to contributing Residential properties shall not be permitted, except for rooftop additions which comply with all of the following requirements: − the proposed addition is located behind the rear eaves line − the proposed addition is no greater than 2/3 the height of the primary structure* − The proposed addition has been demonstrated to have minimal impact upon the three-dimensional integrity of the contributing property Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies

* The height of the primary structure will be measured from the ground plane to the eaves line 85 6.12 ROOFS

The roof of a contributing property often expresses 6.12.1 Conserve the original or restored roof distinct characteristics that define both the form and profile ofcontributing properties architectural style of the building and contribute to the streetwall. Roof form helps to define the overall a. Minor alterations may be permitted where massing, proportions and scale of a building, while determined to be appropriate, including the roof components convey the assemblage of a roof installation of features to increase building providing the architectural detailing that reflects its performance and life cycle architectural history, form, function and design. b. The design, massing and placement of alterations Roofs may have multiple profiles that distinguish should conserve the original or restored roof form and architectural style alluding to the time form and profile of the building, as viewed from period the building was constructed and the function the public realm the roof had to perform. These styles include but are c. If it is not technically possible to locate not limited to: alterations out of view of the public realm, ensure − Gabled roofs that they do not negatively impact the District’s − Hipped roofs cultural heritage value, heritage attributes, and the integrity of the contributing property − Mansard roofs − Flat roofs 6.12.2 Conserve the original or restored

Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies − Mono-pitched roofs structural and architectural roof components of − Domed roofs contributing properties Roofs include aspects of practical and decorative a. Original or restored roof features should not be architectural detail, including but not limited to: removed

− Entablature features (cornices, brackets, fascia, b. Repair rather than replace damaged or pediments, etc.) deteriorated original or restored roof components − Chimneys, weathervanes, cresting and firewalls c. Replace only those original or restored roof − Turrets, parapets, and tower features components that have deteriorated beyond repair − Dormers d. Ensure that the form, materials and colour of − Cladding materials (slate, asphalt shingle, tile, eavestroughs and downspouts do not negatively etc.) impact the integrity of the contributing property The stability of the roof assembly, insulation, vapour barrier and structure below the visible roof material is important to conserving the roof itself, as is the condition, performance and integrity of parapets and rainwater diversion elements. City Of Toronto June 2017 86 6.13 WINDOWS AND DOORS

Exterior windows and doors often include 6.13.1 Conserve the form, placement, rhythm architectural detail such as: plain, stained, or and style of original or restored windows and coloured glass, divided lights and materials of wood doors of contributing properties or metal, decorative treatments and hardware. The glazing may be set in original, distinctive frames a. Minor alterations may be permitted where of wood or metal, with divided lights. There may determined to be appropriate, including the be mouldings that make the transition between the installation of features to increase building frame and masonry opening. Some window frames, performance and life cycle door frames, sidelights, transoms and glazing are original to the building and these elements may be 6.13.2 Conserve structural and architectural important features to the property’s significance. features of original or restored windows and The use of metal sashes and the solid-to-void doors of contributing properties ratio of window to wall in contributing Commercial a. Repair rather than replace damaged or properties is an especially distinctive heritage deteriorated original or restored window and attribute of the District. door features

b. Replace original or restored window and door features only when they have deteriorated beyond repair Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies c. Ensure that the form, materials and colour of eavestroughs and downspouts do not negatively impact the integrity of the contributing property

6.13.3 Do not introduce new window or door openings on contributing properties on street- facing elevations or elevations visible from the public realm

a. If new window and door openings are required and cannot be located on an elevation not visible from the public realm, ensure the form, placement and style of the new window or door is complementary to the contributing property

87 6.14 EXTERIOR WALLS

Exterior walls include: foundation walls, raised 6.14.1 Conserve the original or restored basements and walls from the ground through attic exterior wall form, detail and materiality of level, and in all but the Residential Building Typology, contributing properties may include the walls of projecting elements such as parapets, bays, towers and penthouses. Walls a. Minor alterations may be permitted where may be designed as flat planes with projections or determined to be appropriate, including the recesses, with decorative masonry detail or plain installation of features to increase building masonry coursing. Exterior walls have openings performance and life cycle at the locations of windows and doors, and the masonry openings are often finished at their heads, b. The design, massing and placement of sides and sills with modest or decorative treatments alterations should conserve the original or dependent on the style, complexity and design of the restored exterior wall form and style as viewed building. from the public realm

The form, detail and materiality of exterior walls of c. If it is not technically possible to locate contributing properties are important to the integrity alterations out of view of the public realm, of each contributing property, and to the District ensure that they do not negatively impact overall. the District’s cultural heritage value, heritage attributes, and the integrity of the contributing property Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies 6.14.2 Conserve original or restored exterior wall features and details of contributing properties a. Conserve the composition, materials, size, finishes, patterns, detailing, tooling and colours of original or restored exterior walls

b. Damaged or deteriorated original or restored exterior wall features should be repaired rather than replaced

c. Replace only those original or restored exterior wall features that have deteriorated beyond repair

6.14.3 Additions to contributing properties shall use exterior wall materials that are physically and visually complementary to the District’s heritage attributes, and that do not negatively impact the integrity of the contributing property City Of Toronto June 2017 88 6.15 ENTRANCES, PORCHES AND BALCONIES

Entrances, porches, and balconies may include 6.15.1 Conserve the form, placement and architectural detail such as: stairs, ramps, railings, style of original or restored entrances, porches canopies, roofs, gables, columns, piers, metal work, and balconies of contributing properties woodwork detail and decorative treatments. a. Minor alterations may be permitted where Within the District entrance treatments may be determined to be appropriate, including the typical (similar to other buildings due to use or installation of features to increase building function, or proximity one to another) or unique. performance and life cycle Many entrances demonstrate aspects of highly refined design intention, and craftsmanship of b. Alterations should conserve the form, placement, brick, stone, terracotta or metal; often the design and style of original or restored entrances, of the entrances is a heritage attribute that includes porches and balconies as viewed from the public stylistic or identifying features. Entrances may be realm flush to the street face or recessed based on design; many entries are raised above grade with inset stairs c. If it is not technically possible to locate to allow daylight to basement levels. Some entrance alterations out of view of the public realm, treatments have been altered in compatible or ensure that they do not negatively impact incompatible ways. the District’s cultural heritage value, heritage attributes, and the integrity of the contributing property Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies 6.15.2 Conserve the features and details of original or restored entrances, porches and balconies of contributing properties a. Conserve the material, stairs, ramps, railings, canopies, roofs, gables, columns, piers, metal work and woodwork, assemblies and craftsmanship of original or restored entrances, porches and balconies

b. Damaged or deteriorated original or restored entrance, porch and balcony features should be repaired rather than replaced

c. Replace only those original or restored entrance, porch and balcony features that have deteriorated beyond repair

89 6.16 LIGHTING 6.17 SIGNAGE

The lighting of contributing properties can be an All applications for new signage on contributing important feature that contributes both to the public properties will be reviewed in accordance with the realm as well as the individual property, illuminating City of Toronto’s Sign By-Law and the definitions heritage attributes and facilitating visibility at night of and regulations specified therein. The policies and prominent features. guidelines here provide additional direction on the application of the by-law to contributing properties The lighting of contributing properties will vary, so that new signs will not negatively impact the depending upon the building typology, proposed cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the alterations, light trespass from the street and District. adjacent properties, and the intent of the proposed lighting scheme. 6.17.1 Signage shall be designed and placed to be complementary to the design of the 6.16.1 Exterior lighting of contributing contributing property properties shall be complementary to the design of the contributing property a. Do not block, obscure or negatively impact the windows, doors, roofline, or architectural a. Do not use general floodlighting, coloured features of the contributing property lighting, downlighting, or lighting programs that would distract from the heritage character of the b. Storefront signage should use the existing contributing property historic signage fascia boards, where they exist

Policies And Guidelines For Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies or are being restored 6.16.2 Exterior lighting shall be mounted in a manner that does not result in any direct or 6.17.2 Signage shall be mounted in a manner indirect harm to the integrity of the contributing that does not result in any direct or indirect property harm to the integrity of the contributing property or adjacent contributing properties a. Where lighting is being mounted directly on a building, attachments should be through a. Where signage is being mounted directly on mortar joints and not masonry units, using non- a building, attachments should be through corrosive fasteners mortar joints and not masonry units, using non- corrosive fasteners b. Lighting should be attached in a manner that ensures the removal will not cause damage to the b. Signage should be attached in a manner that integrity of the contributing property ensures the removal will not cause damage to the integrity of the contributing property 6.16.3 New exterior lighting of contributing properties shall conform to applicable City of Toronto lighting by-laws City Of Toronto June 2017 90 6.17.3 The following signage types may be − Externally illuminated signs: projecting permitted on the first floor ofcontributing signage or fascia signage that is lit by an properties: artificial light source located external to − Window signs: signage attached, painted, the sign etched, inscribed or projected onto any 6.17.4 The following signage types will not be part of a window, not including temporary permitted on contributing properties: window displays. a. Do not mount window signs on the exterior − Third party signs: signage not related of a window to the occupants or programming of the contributing property b. Ensure that window signs do not cover more than 25% of the window − Banners: suspended fabric signs mounted parallel to the building elevation − Fascia signs: signage attached to or supported by a fascia board which projects − Digital display screens, moving signs, no more than 0.6m from the wall signs with mechanical or electronic copy c. Locate fascia signs on storefront fascias only − Wall signs: signage attached or painted

directly onto the wall surface Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies − Projecting signs: signage attached to or supported by the wall of a building which − Roof signs: signage installed on or projects more than 0.6m from the wall projecting from the roof d. Locate projecting signs in proximity to − Internally illuminated signs: signage that entrances. One projecting sign may be permitted per entrance is lit by an artificial light source located on or within the sign, including sign boxes e. Ensure that projecting signs have a minimum 6.17.5 The installation of any signage type vertical clearance of 2.5m from the ground to the lowest part of the sign not listed in the previous two policies may be permitted providing it does not negatively f. Ensure that projecting signs do not project impact the District’s cultural heritage value more than 1m from the exterior wall of a and heritage attributes, as well as the integrity building, and have a sign face no greater than of the contributing property 1m2 6.17.6 Painted signage on contributing g. Where it is not feasible to install a project properties that reflect the property’s historic sign at the first floor without negatively use(s) should be conserved impacting the contributing property, upper storey projecting signs may be permitted, 6.17.7 Signage on contributing properties shall providing they are vertically oriented and comply with the City of Toronto’s Sign By-Law have a sign face no greater than 1m2

91

7.0 NON-CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES POLICIES AND GUIDELINESFOR 7.12 7.11 7.10 7.9 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.5 7.4 Demolition 7.3 7.2 7.1 Parking andServiceAreas Signage Lighting Roofs Exterior Walls Articulation andProportions Massing Alterations andAdditions Combined Properties Adjacency toContributingProperties Understanding 93 Policies And Guidelines For Non-Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan Policies And Guidelines For Non-Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies City Of Toronto June 2017 94 7.1 UNDERSTANDING

This section contains policies and guidelines New development should be designed to conserve intended to manage change within the District in and enhance the District’s heritage attributes. order to meet the objectives of this Plan. New development should contribute to the overall character and sense of place of the District, and will The policies (in bold font) describe what is required be expected to respect and build upon the District’s when undertaking work on a non-contributing cultural heritage value. Each project must therefore property within the District. Policies are required start with an understanding of the District’s cultural components of the designating by-law and are not heritage value and heritage attributes. discretionary, unless otherwise indicated. 7.1.1 New development on non-contributing The guidelines (in regular font) provide suggested properties shall be complementary to the methods of satisfying associated policies, but do District’s cultural heritage value and heritage not carry the mandatory weight of policy. Guidelines attributes while reflecting its own time recognize that there may be a variety of strategies that could satisfy any given policy. a. Avoid creating a false historic appearance. Design new development to be complementary Terms in italics have been defined, and are listed in to but not replicate the architectural style of Appendix A of this Plan. adjacent contributing properties Policies And Guidelines For Non-Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies

95 7.2 ADJACENCY TO CONTRIBUTING 7.3 COMBINED PROPERTIES PROPERTIES

The City of Toronto’s Official Plan requires that Combined properties include consolidated properties proposed alterations, new development and public (combining contributing and non-contributing works adjacent to properties on the Heritage Register properties), as well as contributing properties that ensure that the integrity of the adjacent properties’ contain vacant space upon which new development cultural heritage value and heritage attributes could occur. In both cases, it is essential that the be retained, prior to work commencing and to conservation process be followed and conservation the satisfaction of the City. All properties within treatments identified to conserve the contributing the District are include on the Heritage Register; property in the design of any addition or new therefore, any alteration to a property within or development. adjacent to the District must conserve the District’s cultural heritage value and heritage attributes, which 7.3.1 Alterations to combined properties includes its contributing properties. shall conserve the portion(s) of the property identified as contributing to the District 7.2.1 Alterations to a non-contributing according to Section 6 of this Plan property or properties adjacent to the District shall conserve the District's cultural heritage 7.3.2 New development on those portions value and heritage attributes of combined properties identified asnon- contributing shall be consistent with Section 7 of this Plan Policies And Guidelines For Non-Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies City Of Toronto June 2017 96 7.4 DEMOLITION 7.5 NEW DEVELOPMENT AND ADDITIONS

Non-contributing properties do not represent New development and additions to non-contributing the cultural heritage value of the District and can properties are reviewed for their impact on adjacent therefore be demolished without a negative impact contributing properties and the District. on those values. However, conserving and enhancing the predominant built form, streetwall and rhythm of 7.5.1 New development and additions to buildings, structures and character sub-areas within non-contributing properties shall not be the District is important to preserving the District’s permitted except where the proposed work has integrity. Demolition of non-contributing properties been evaluated and it has been demonstrated should therefore be closely followed by construction. that the cultural heritage value and heritage Demolition that results in empty lots or other gaps in attributes of the District will be conserved the urban fabric is strongly discouraged. a. The documentation, description and mitigation 7.4.1 The demolition of buildings or structures measures for any new development or addition on non-contributing properties may be to non-contributing properties will be described permitted, upon satisfaction of policy 7.4.2 of through a Heritage Impact Assessment this Plan satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning 7.4.2 The demolition permit for a building or structure on a non-contributing property 7.5.2 New development and additions shall not be issued until plans for the new to a non-contributing property shall be development have been submitted and complementary to the District’s cultural approved by City Council, and a heritage heritage value and heritage attributes Non-Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies permit for the demolition issued by the City. 7.5.3 New development and additions to non- Such plans shall comply with the policies and contributing properties shall not negatively guidelines of this Plan impact the District’s cultural heritage value a. Substantial progress should be made in the and heritage attributes, including any adjacent construction of the replacement building(s) contributing properties within two years of the demolition of the previous building b. If construction of the replacement building(s) is delayed due to unforeseen circumstances, the City of Toronto may require interim landscape treatment of the site c. Additional planning approvals may be required prior to the issuance of a demolition permit

97 7.6 MASSING

Massing relates to the exterior form of a building 7.6.1 New development on non-contributing and its spatial relationship to its immediate context, properties shall be designed to be including the space in front, behind, beside and complementary to the design, scale, form and above the building where visible from the public massing of adjacent contributing properties realm. It pertains to the overall proportions of a building or structure, its relationship to adjacent 7.6.2 New development on non-contributing properties, and its impact on the scale and character properties shall be setback the same of the streetscape and public realm. Massing is distance as the primary structure on adjacent interrelated to the composition of the streetwall, the contributing properties roof, as well as the architectural expression of the building or structure in its entirety. a. The setback of new development may transition from the setback of the primary structure of The existing massing in King-Spadina varies, adjacent contributing properties a distance to reflecting the two Building Typologies that define be determined based on the scale, form and the District’s historic character – Commercial and massing of the new development and adjacent Residential properties – as well as contemporary new contributing properties development and additions. The close juxtaposition of this historic massing contributes to the District’s b. Conserve the view of adjacent contributing cultural heritage value and reflects the District’s properties from the public realm when evolution from a residential neighbourhood to a determining appropriate setback transitions warehouse and manufacturing area. c. If there are no adjacent contributing properties, Policies And Guidelines For Non-Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies The following policies seek to ensure complementary setback distances will be determined by other new development that conserve’s the District's applicable policies cultural heritage value through appropriate massing adjacent to contributing properties. This Plan 7.6.3 New development on non-contributing recognizes that a range of design approaches may be properties shall be designed with a streetwall appropriate to achieve the objectives of this Plan and not to exceed the height of the streetwall conserve the District’s cultural heritage value, based established by the primary structure(s) on on the scale, form and massing of the proposed adjacent contributing properties new development and that of adjacent contributing properties. a. Where there are no adjacent contributing properties, the streetwall height for new development will be informed by other applicable policies City Of Toronto June 2017 98 7.6.4 Additional height above the streetwall on non-contributing properties shall step back from all elevations facing a street a. Step back distances will be determined based upon the design, scale and massing of the proposed new development and adjacent contributing properties b. Where there are no adjacent contributing properties, the step back for new development will be informed by other applicable policies Policies And Guidelines For Non-Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies

99 7.7 ARTICULATION AND 7.8 EXTERIOR WALLS PROPORTIONS

7.7.1 New development on non-contributing The exterior walls of contributing properties express properties shall reference the horizontal the overall materiality of buildings in the District. articulation of adjacent contributing properties New development and additions to non-contributing properties must conserve and enhance the District’s a. Align first floor heights with the first floor heights cultural heritage value and heritage attributes with of adjacent contributing properties materials and finishes that are complementary to the exterior walls of adjacent contributing properties. b. Align the horizontal articulation of the streetwall Contemporary materials may be used to create a with that of adjacent contributing properties, contrast between new development and historic referring to cornice lines, datum lines, window buildings. For portions of new development and heads, articulated floor levels and other additions that are higher than the streetwall of horizontal architectural details adjacent contributing buildings, contemporary 7.7.2 New development on non-contributing materials such as glass can add lightness to a building and mitigate some of its visual impact on properties shall reference the vertical adjacent contributing properties and the streetscape. articulation of adjacent contributing properties 7.8.1 The exterior walls of new development a. Incorporate vertical articulation in the design of streetwalls that reflect the predominant on non-contributing properties visible from building and bay widths of adjacent contributing the public realm shall be designed in a properties manner that anticipates their visibility and is complementary to the District’s cultural

Policies And Guidelines For Non-Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies 7.7.3 New development on non-contributing heritage value and heritage attributes properties shall reference the proportions and solid-to-void ratios of adjacent contributing a. Continue the materiality of street-facing properties elevations on side and rear walls a. The dimension and organization of window and b. Include windows and other forms of articulation door openings on non-contributing properties on side, rear and street-facing exterior walls should maintain the character and appearance of c. Include secondary entrances on side, rear and adjacent contributing properties street-facing exterior walls, especially where facing a laneway or street 7.7.4 New development on non-contributing properties shall not include blank walls facing 7.8.3 Materials used in the design of the the public realm exterior walls of new development on non- contributing properties shall be complementary to adjacent contributing properties City Of Toronto June 2017 100 7.9 ROOFS 7.10 LIGHTING

The roof form of a building helps define its overall The lighting of non-contributing properties is an massing, proportions and scale. Consideration opportunity to both illuminate the building as well should be given to its expression, its junction with as contribute to the District’s character. Care should the exterior wall, and impact on adjacent contributing be exercised in the design of lighting schemes for properties. non-contributing properties to consider the impact on adjacent contributing properties. 7.9.1 The roof design of new development on non-contributing properties shall not 7.10.1 Exterior lighting of non-contributing detract from or obscure adjacent contributing properties shall not detract from the integrity of properties, or negatively impact the District’s adjacent contributing properties, or negatively cultural heritage value and heritage attributes impact the District's cultural heritage value and heritage attributes 7.9.2 New rooftop elements on non- contributing properties, including but 7.10.2 Exterior lighting on non-contributing not limited to mechanical penthouses, properties shall conform to applicable City of vents, drainage components, sustainable Toronto lighting by-laws technologies, satellite dishes, skylights, metal chimneys, flues and decks shall be located out of view from the public realm a. If it is not technically possible to locate the

rooftop elements out of view from the public Non-Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies realm, ensure that they are appropriately screened. Use screening material and design the screen so as to be complementary to the District’s heritage attributes

101 7.11 SIGNAGE 7.12 PARKING AND SERVICE AREAS

All applications for new signage on non-contributing 7.12.1 Vehicular access through the streetwall properties will be reviewed in accordance with the of non-contributing properties shall not be City of Toronto’s Sign By-Law and the definitions permitted, unless it can be demonstrated that and regulations specified therein. The policies and this access is essential to the function of the guidelines here provide additional direction on the proposed development and alternative means application of the Sign By-Law to non-contributing of access are not possible properties without negatively impacting the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the District. a. When vehicular access through the streetwall is deemed necessary, this access will be designed 7.11.1 New signage on non-contributing to minimize its visual impact on the streetscape properties shall not detact from the integrity of adjacent contributing properties, or negatively impact the District’s cultural heritage value and heritage attributes

a. Design the location, scale, design and materials of new signage to be complementary to adjacent contributing properties

7.11.2 New signage on non-contributing properties shall comply with the City of

Policies And Guidelines For Non-Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies Toronto’s Sign By-Law City Of Toronto June 2017 102 Policies And Guidelines For Non-Contributing Properties | King-Spadina HCD Plan And Guidelines For Policies

103

8.0 Policies andGuidelinesforCharacter Sub-Areas 8.4 8.3 8.2 8.1 Duncan Street Spadina Avenue Wellington Place St. Andrew's 105

Policies And Guidelines For Character Sub-Areas | King-Spadina HCD Plan 8.1 ST. ANDREW’S 8.2 WELLINGTON PLACE

8.1.1 The revitalization of St. Andrew’s 8.2.1 New development on non-contributing Playground should emphasize its historic and properties and additions to contributing continued importance as a centre for local civic properties shall respect the integrity of the life and as a recreational amenity unique civic composition of Wellington Place, particularly with respect to the historic scale 8.1.2 Public realm improvements should and built form that frames and gives three- be informed by and reflect the history of the dimensional integrity to the two parks and the expansion of the Town of York into the Military public realm of Wellington Street West Reserve 8.2.2 New development on non-contributing 8.1.3 New development on non-contributing properties and public realm improvements properties adjacent to contributing Residential should be informed by and reinforce the properties on Adelaide Street West, Portland original intentions of the 1837 Hawkins Plan Street and Adelaide Place shall reference for Wellington Place the fine grained residential lot pattern, and incorporate massing transitions to respect the a. Reinstate the formal, tree-lined boulevards on historic scale of the contributing Residential Wellington Street West properties

Policies and Guidelines for Character Sub-Areas | King-Spadina HCD Plan Policies b. Reinforce the picturesque complexity of the 8.1.4 The civic composition of the former interior realm of Clarence Square Brant Street Public School and St. Andrew’s c. Conserve and enhance the visual connection Playground should be enhanced, including between Clarence Square and the contributing conserving sightlines between these two Residential properties on the north side of properties Clarence Square

8.1.5 New development on non-contributing 8.2.3 Additions to contributing Commercial properties and additions to contributing properties on Wellington Street West shall properties shall conserve the St. Andrew step back 10 metres from all elevations facing Character Sub-Area’s historic scale, block and Wellington Street West lot pattern through massing transitions, façade articulation and conserving and enhancing the 8.2.4 New development on non-contributing network of laneways properties and additions to contributing properties shall conserve the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes identified in the Part IV designation by-laws for Clarence Square and Victoria Memorial Square City Of Toronto June 2017 106 properties 8.3.4 facing SpadinaAvenue shall stepback10metresfromallelevations a. 5 storeys Commercial detachedpropertiesthatareover the massingandscaleof historic scaleofSpadinaAvenue,particularly 8.3.3 boulevard the area’shistoriccharacterasadesigned characteristics ofSpadinaAvenuetoreinforce ‘Garment District’andtheuniqueright-of-way of SpadinaAvenueasthecentre be informedbyandreferencethehistory and publicrealm properties 8.3.2 the District,andshallbe heritage attribute sides ofSpadinaAvenueisasignificant contributing 8.3.1 8.3 policies properties, asdeterminedbyotherapplicable greater thanthatof may bepermittedtohavea new development Commercial propertiesthatareover5storeys, Where thereareno New development Additions New development The concentrationofmid-rise SPADINA AVENUE shouldconserve , additions Commercialpropertiesonboth tocontributingproperties improvementsshould ofthecharactersub-area onnon-contributingproperties tocontributingproperties adjacent contributing adjacent contributing onnon-contributing onnon-contributing conserved contributing andenhancethe streetwall height

and b. Design a. 8.3.5 rooflines separated bymasonrypiers,andarticulated at thebasewithbrickabove,windowbays storey groundfloors,theuseofstonemasonry Character Sub-Area,generallydefinedby1.5 properties withintheSpadinaAvenue and articulationof properties base, shaftandroofline Avenue CharacterSub-Area contributing properties Refer tothematerial,textureandcolourof New development new development shouldreferencethemateriality contributing within theSpadina onnon-contributing toincludeadefined Commercial 107

Policies and Guidelines for Character Sub-Areas | King-Spadina HCD Plan 8.4 DUNCAN STREET

8.4.1 Additions to contributing properties shall step back a minimum of 10 metres from all elevations facing Duncan Street 8.4.2 The base building of new development on non-contributing properties and additions to contributing properties should reference the materiality and articulation of contributing properties within the Duncan Street Character Sub-Area, generally defined by the use of brick masonry with stone detailing, window bays separated by masonry piers, and cornices Policies and Guidelines for Character Sub-Areas | King-Spadina HCD Plan Policies City Of Toronto June 2017 108 109

Policies and Guidelines for Character Sub-Areas | King-Spadina HCD Plan

9.0 Policies andGuidelinesforParks andPublicRealm 9.4 9.3 9.2 Views 9.1 Utilities andPublicWorks Network ofLaneways St. Andrew'sPlayground,ClarenceSquareandVictoriaMemorial 111

Policies And Guidelines For Parks and Public Realm | King-Spadina HCD Plan 9.1 ST. ANDREW’S PLAYGROUND, CLARENCE SQUARE AND VICTORIA MEMORIAL SQUARE

Three public parks within the District (St. Andrew’s 9.1.1 New development shall not be permitted Playground, Clarence Square and Victoria within St. Andrew’s Playground, Clarence Memorial Square) have been recognized for their Square and Victoria Memorial Square contributions to the District’s cultural heritage value, and are associated with the residential planning, 9.1.2 New development on non-contributing development and expansion that began in the late properties and additions to contributing 1830s when the Town of York expanded into the properties shall not negatively impact the Military Reserve. These parks served the residential heritage attributes of St. Andrew's Playground, uses that flourished in the District through the 19th Clarence Square and Victoria Memorial Square century prior to the area becoming more industrial in the early twentieth century, and continue to serve the 9.1.3 New development on non-contributing surrounding communities as important recreational properties and additions to contributing spaces. properties shall limit new net shadows on St. Andrew's Playground, Clarence Square and Victoria Memorial Square 9.1.4 Maintain the tree canopy and historic circulation within St. Andrew’s Playground, Clarence Square and Victoria Memorial Square Policies and Guidelines for Parks and Public Realm | King-Spadina HCD Plan and Guidelines for Parks Policies 9.1.5 Conserve and enhance public use and programming within St. Andrew’s Playground, Clarence Square and Victoria Memorial Square 9.1.6 Conserve and enhance the historic interpretation of St. Andrew’s Playground, Clarence Square and Victoria Memorial Square through installations, programming and adjacent new development 9.1.7 Conserve the existing site layout of Clarence Square and its environs, and its current function as a central organizing feature that directs views, circulation routes, and pedestrians into the park City Of Toronto June 2017 112 a. community valueofthesespaces the historicalsignificanceandsocial Memorial Squareshouldbemadethatreflect Playground, ClarenceSquareandVictoria 9.1.11 EnhancementstoSt.Andrew’s contributing properties and patternofthebuiltform of thiscivicspaceandthehistoricscale particularly theorientationandorganization and significanceofClarenceSquare, Clarence Square,shallrespectthe Square, andtotheeastsoutheastof corner ofSpadinaAvenueandClarence 9.1.10 Newdevelopment park andthesubsequentexpansion distinguishes betweenoriginalportionsofthe demarcates thepark’shistoriclimitsand undertaken inamannerthatclearly Square’s currentboundariesshouldbe 9.1.9 the park should maintainaprimaryorientationtowards properties 9.1.8 these parks historic circulationroutes,and/orthesettingof that negativelyimpactsvisualrelationships, or infrastructurethathasbeenintroducedbut interventions mayincluderemovaloffurnishings and historyofthesite.Otherappropriate that aresympathetictotheoverallsetting Enhancementsshouldusedesigntreatments Any futureexpansionofClarence New development thatareadjacent onnon-contributing atthenortheast toClarenceSquare adjacent integrity

113

Policies and Guidelines for Parks and Public Realm | King-Spadina HCD Plan 9.2 VIEWS

9.2.1 Views identified in this Plan (Views map, page 115) express the District’s cultural heritage value, and shall be conserved. New development on non-contributing properties and additions to contributing properties should be undertaken to be complementary to and not obstruct these views Policies and Guidelines for Parks and Public Realm | King-Spadina HCD Plan and Guidelines for Parks Policies City Of Toronto June 2017 114 115

Policies and Guidelines for Parks and Public Realm | King-Spadina HCD Plan 9.3 NETWORK OF LANEWAYS

The network of laneways identified in this Plan 9.3.2 Laneways owned by the City shall (Section 5.4) is a heritage attribute of the District be conserved, maintaining their location, that reflects historic circulation routes as well as the alignment, connection to adjacent laneways, historic land use of adjacent contributing properties. and views from the public realm A majority of the laneways were established during the period of significance (1880s-1940s), and reflect a. Enable pedestrian and cyclist access to City- the District’s historical and contextual values. These owned laneways laneways continue to serve as important circulation routes for pedestrians and cyclists, as well as b. Maintain laneway paving in good condition service access and parking. Increasingly, property c. Do not obstruct views of laneways with owners are re-interpreting laneways spaces that can installations, including impermeable fencing, accommodate a variety of commercial, creative and walls, infrastructure, or signage cultural activities. d. Enhance laneways with pavement treatments and 9.3.1 The network of laneways shall be appropriate lighting conserved, extended and enhanced 9.3.3 Laneways that are privately owned a. A variety of uses and functions should be are strongly encouraged to be conserved, facilitated, including but not limited to pedestrian maintaining their location, alignment, and bicycle use, service access, active uses at Policies and Guidelines for Parks and Public Realm | King-Spadina HCD Plan and Guidelines for Parks Policies grade, and creative and cultural activities connection to adjacent laneways, and views from the public realm b. Business servicing and delivery hours should be coordinated to support the use of laneways as a. Do not obstruct views of laneways with public circulation routes installations, including impermeable fencing, walls, infrastructure, or signage c. Interpretation of the network of laneways, including their historic use and evolution over b. The current functions of laneways should be time, is encouraged respected and integrated with any proposed improvements and/or new development

c. Enhance laneways with pavement treatments and appropriate lighting City Of Toronto June 2017 116 b. a. undertaken withinor Preservation Servicesstaffpriortoworksbeing City departmentsshalladviseHeritage 9.5.2 District and utilityupgradesshallbemetwithinthe 9.5.1 9.5 negative impactsonviewsidentifiedinthisPlan properties, andtoavoidtheobstructionofor interventions withbuildingfabriconcontributing undertaken toavoidnon-reversibleandvisible and otherutilityinfrastructureshouldbe Installation ofgasconnections,groundservices, objectives ofthisPlan should bedevelopedinconsiderationofthe take intoaccountthatpreferredprojectsolutions within theDistrict,relevantproponentsshould Where publicworksprojectsareundertaken Utility companiesandrelevant On-going requirementsforpublicworks UTILITIES AND PUBLIC WORKS UTILITIES AND adjacent totheDistrict 117

Policies and Guidelines for Parks and Public Realm | King-Spadina HCD Plan

10.0 Archaeological Resources Archaeological Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 10.1 Archaeological Resource Requirements 10.2 Toronto General Hospital ASA 10.3 Victoria Memorial Square ASA

119 10.1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS

In general, the City of Toronto Archaeological Management Plan assigns archaeological potential on a simple “yes” or “no” basis. Either a property exhibits archaeological potential or it does not. Research undertaken for the King-Spadina HCD Study and Plan has refined this approach for each of the properties that exhibit archaeological potential by categorizing each property according to the types of activities that would likely require an archaeological assessment, or review of the need for an archaeological assessment on the part of City Archaeological Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan staff, prior to activities that will result in some form of ground disturbance that might not otherwise be subject to archaeological planning control outside of a designated HCD.

Table 1: Development/Alteration Types for Properties with Archaeological Potential Category Development/Alteration Type 1 Additions to existing structures requiring subsurface disturbances 2 New structures/installations in open space areas within other part(s) of the property requiring subsurface disturbances 3 Foundation repair/alteration to existing buildings 4 New service hook ups or repairs to a building frontage with a minimal setback and originating from the adjacent right-of-way 5 New service hook ups or repairs to a building set back from the right-of-way of origin 6 Landscape alterations requiring subsurface excavation/grade changes City Of Toronto June 2017 120 Table 2: Properties with Generalized Archaeological Potential and Impact Categories of Concern Address Contributing Status Alterations Requiring Assessment/Review 217 Adelaide St W Non-contributing not applicable 260 Adelaide St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 5 (from north or south), 6 266 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 268 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 270 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 280 Adelaide St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 302 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 304 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 306 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 Archaeological Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 308 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 342 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 350 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 352 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 353 Adelaide St W, 46 Char- Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) lotte St 354 Adelaide St W Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 363 Adelaide St W Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 424 Adelaide St W Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 450 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 480 Adelaide St W Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 487 Adelaide St W Contributing (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 501 Adelaide St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 504 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 505 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 506 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 507 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 508 Adelaide St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 509 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 510 Adelaide St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 (St. Mary’s/Cholera Cemetery) 511 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 512 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6

121 Table 2: Properties with Generalized Archaeological Potential and Impact Categories of Concern Address Contributing Status Alterations Requiring Assessment/Review 514 Adelaide St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 64 Bathurst St Contributing 1, 2, 6 66 Bathurst St Contributing 1, 2, 6 68 Bathurst St Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 70 Bathurst St Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 74 Bathurst St Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 125 Bathurst St Contributing 2, 5, 6 141 Bathurst St Contributing 1, 2, 5, 6 147 Bathurst St Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 Archaeological Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 149 Bathurst St Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 151 Bathurst St Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 152 Bathurst St Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 153 Bathurst St Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 155 Bathurst St Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 157 Bathurst St Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 159 Bathurst St Contributing 1, 2, 6 160 Bathurst St Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 161 Bathurst St Contributing 1, 2, 6 162 Bathurst St Contributing 1, 2, 6 164 Bathurst St Contributing 1, 2, 6 20 Brant St Contributing 1, 2, 5 (from south, north), 6 13-19 Camden St Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 18 Camden St Contributing 1, 2, 6 (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 23 ½ Camden St Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 23.5 Camden St Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 15 Duncan St Contributing 1, 2, 5 (from east), 6 19 Duncan St Contributing 1, 2, 5 (from east), 6 122 John St Contributing 2, 6 220 King St W Contributing 1, 2, 5 (from north), 6 369 King St W Non-contributing not applicable 387 King St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 City Of Toronto June 2017 122 Table 2: Properties with Generalized Archaeological Potential and Impact Categories of Concern Address Contributing Status Alterations Requiring Assessment/Review 389 King St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 391 King St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 460 King St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 461 King St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 464 King St W Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 495 King St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 499 King St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 533 King St W Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 582 King St W Contributing Not applicable (stage 1 if redeveloped) Archaeological Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 20 Maud St Contributing 1, 2, 5 (from south), 6 30 Maud St Non-contributing 1, 2, 5 (from east), 6 10 Niagara St Contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (Victoria Memorial Square) 30 Niagara St Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 16 Oxley St Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 158 Pearl St Contributing 1, 2, 5 (from east), 6 82 Peter St Contributing 1, 2, 6 81-87 Peter St Non-contributing not applicable 118 Peter St Contributing 2, 6 120 Peter St Contributing 2, 6 122 Peter St Contributing 2, 6 124 Peter St Contributing 2, 6 128 Peter St Non-contributing 2, 6 (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 115 Portland St Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 120 Portland St Non-contributing 2, 6 121 Portland St Non-contributing 2, 6 122 Portland St Non-contributing 2, 6 123 Portland St Non-contributing 2, 6 124 Portland St Contributing 2, 6 125 Portland St Non-contributing not applicable( Stage 1 if redeveloped) 126 Portland St Contributing 2, 6

123 Table 2: Properties with Generalized Archaeological Potential and Impact Categories of Concern Address Contributing Status Alterations Requiring Assessment/Review 127 Portland St Contributing 1, 2, 3, 6 128 Portland St Contributing 2, 6 130 Portland St Contributing 2, 6 132 Portland St Non-contributing 2, 6 9 Portugal Sq Contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 229, 233 Richmond St W, 76, Non-contributing not applicable 78, 86 Nelson St 260 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 5 (from north), 6 269 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 Archaeological Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 275 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 300 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 304 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 401 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 451 Richmond St W Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 465 Richmond St W Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 542 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 544 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 555 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 5 (from east), 6 (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 589 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 591 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 592 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 594 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 596 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 598 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 600 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 602 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 604 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 604R Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 25 Spadina Ave (Clarence Contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Square) City Of Toronto June 2017 124 Table 2: Properties with Generalized Archaeological Potential and Impact Categories of Concern Table 2: Properties with Generalized Archaeological Potential and Impact Categories of Concern Address Contributing Status Alterations Requiring Assessment/Review Address Contributing Status Alterations Requiring Assessment/Review 127 Portland St Contributing 1, 2, 3, 6 78 Spadina Ave Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 128 Portland St Contributing 2, 6 126 Spadina Ave Contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 130 Portland St Contributing 2, 6 129 Spadina Ave Contributing Stage 1 if redeveloped 132 Portland St Non-contributing 2, 6 374 Wellington St W Contributing 1, 2, 5 (from south), 6 9 Portugal Sq Contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 376 Wellington St W Contributing 1, 2, 5 (from south), 6 229, 233 Richmond St W, 76, Non-contributing not applicable 432 Wellington St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 78, 86 Nelson St 436 Wellington St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 260 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 5 (from north), 6 462 Wellington St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 269 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 485 Wellington St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 Archaeological Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 275 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 489 Wellington St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 300 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 488 Wellington St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 304 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 517 Wellington St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 401 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 535 Wellington St W Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 451 Richmond St W Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 465 Richmond St W Non-contributing not applicable (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 542 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 544 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 555 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 5 (from east), 6 (Stage 1 if redeveloped) 589 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 591 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 592 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 594 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 596 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 598 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 600 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 602 Richmond St W Contributing 1, 2, 6 604 Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 604R Richmond St W Non-contributing 1, 2, 6 25 Spadina Ave (Clarence Contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Square)

125 7 1 0 2

7

e

n L o w

e

r

S

i m

c

o

e

S t u S i m c o e

S t J _ 0 D C ± 5 H _ 1 S K _ F 6 J 3

: 0 Y P B S

4 N 1

: W s E A L R I e F D r t 7

e W

3

0

- t M P

S S

4

1

: n .

O o N

7 t

1 T

0 g C 2 /

E n 7 J

/ i

6 l O

0 l :

R

E P e

T I

E d

M i r v i s h

W A a

y S

W D D A u n c a n

S t a t 7 a 2

D

D n A e N

p D O

3 ,

o t M n T o r M

o : T

n f o i o t

c y

t i e

j

C

l o J o h n

S t r : P a

a

t a &

t

D

i

m e u t s

p a a B D

s

o : E

H S

l A B

a

r

e W

n

a t

e S

G

n A r e

o

o

t t e

n g v

o

i

n i

t

r l

i l

o

s e

T

n W S e t Archaeological Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan

n y l r i l

p

a B l u e

J a y s

W a

y t

P e t e r

S t Way c ys i Blue Ja o g o o F l

o g e n i a d h l

i

W

t

S

A r c B u

d

n

o

m

h

c i

q )

S R

e r e t

c W n

n

t e e

r

S

C

a

l

n t

C e

n

e

e

u

S p a d i n a

A v Q e m e l t t S e

y B a r e W b

t m S

u g n i - H K n o s W

t r i

S

a

n

o

t ( G

g l

n a

i i

l t

l n e D e

W t C H

P o

l a

a n A u g u s t a

A v e i c i d g a ) o l l S p a o i t e & n a

e h g t n o P

K i A r c l a c i g

e o

l

r

P o r o t l a n d a

S t e u a q 9 h S P c

a 2 l

r c . S k s a e A 5 e r i g ( c

M r a

o t

v i i

r o r D Y O e e I

h C S R t i

m s A e r H a T e g

o | a N

t

a W i M

O

F 3

r

, t n 2 e o i 7 a t

H S

i

9

n l d r a o

6 - e

r W a

6 o o

u r d

9 t t t T

p i

6 - u l

c S a t S

1

i l C

e

4 t

e e F & V r d

n t l

| d

S

n a

o c t

9

A r i a s 6

r

g F 0 u o 1 g l h o t 6 - n e a 6 i a B 9

h K 8

c 6 -

r 2 1

-

5 4 A

B a t h u r s t

S t 6 3 I 0 - S P S A 4 City Of Toronto June 2017 1 126 10.2 TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL ARCHAEOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AREA

The Toronto General Hospital was constructed on projects were completed between 2006 and 2010 the northwest corner of King Street West and John prior to the redevelopment of three properties within Street in 1819-1820 within a reserve that extended the former hospital reserve (the Festival Tower, from John Street to Peter Street and Adelaide Street the Pinnacle on Adelaide, and the Cinema Tower). West to King Street West. The greatest public health The results of this work led to the definition of the crisis the hospital faced was the typhus epidemic in Toronto General Hospital Archaeologically Sensitive the summer and fall of 1847, when between 1,200 Area, encompassing all lands within the former and 1,400 patients, mostly Irish Catholics, were reserve. The extent of the Archaeologically Sensitive admitted to the hospital. Accommodating such Area has since been reduced on the basis of large numbers of patients required the construction additional archaeological assessments and analysis of around a dozen large frame fever sheds on the completed for this HCD Plan. grounds of the hospital. The hospital was closed in Archaeological Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan 1854. The building was used to house government Nine properties (seven contributing and two non- offices between 1856 and 1858, but was demolished contributing) are located within the Toronto General around 1862 when the reserve was subdivided for Hospital Archaeologically Sensitive Area (Table residential development. Large scale archaeological 3), which is included as a heritage attribute of the District.

Table 3: Properties within the Toronto General Hospital Archaeologically Sensitive Area Address Contributing or Non- Alterations Requiring contributing Assessment/Review 8 Widmer St Non-contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 10 Widmer St Contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 11 Widmer St Non-contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 12 Widmer St Contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 14 Widmer St Contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 16 Widmer St Contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 18 Widmer St Contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 20 Widmer St Contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 86 John St Contributing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

127 10.3 VICTORIA MEMORIAL SQUARE ARCHAEOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AREA

Victoria Memorial Square is Toronto’s first European cemetery, opened in 1793 as the military cemetery for Fort York. The last burial in Victoria Memorial Square occurred in 1863, and since the 1880s the site has been maintained by the City as a public park. As many as 400 burials may have been made at the site before it was closed. An archaeological assess- ment carried out within the park in advance of its recent revitalization demonstrated that human burials and scattered human remains were to be found as little as 20cm below the ground surface at that time. Archaeological Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan The revitalization involved raising the grade of the cemetery area in order to provide greater protection for the remains as well as archaeological monitoring of all park installations that would result in subsur- face impacts in order to ensure no damage to any remains. Given the ongoing sensitivities posed by the cemetery, it has been designated as an Archaeologi- cally Sensitive Area by the City of Toronto Archaeo- logical Management Plan. It may also be noted that Victoria Memorial Square forms part of the Fort York National Historic Site. City Of Toronto June 2017 128 Archaeological Resources | King-Spadina HCD Plan

129

Procedures | King-Spadina HCD Plan

11.0 Procedures

11.1 Heritage Permits Deemed to be Issued 11.2 Heritage Permit Process 11.3 Heritage Impact Assessment 11.4 Archaeological Assessment

131 11.1 HERITAGE PERMITS DEEMED TO 11.2 HERITAGE PERMIT PROCESS BE ISSUED

Applications for the erection, demolition, alteration, Owners of property within the District are required to or removal of a building or structure within the submit a heritage permit application for alterations District require a heritage permit. In accordance that are visible from the public realm. Proposed with Part V of the OHA and with Chapter 103 of the alterations are reviewed for consistency with City of Toronto Municipal Code, certain classes of this Plan, as well as with any applicable heritage alterations are considered minor in nature and may designation by-laws, easement agreements or other

Procedures | Garden District Hcd Plan be carried out without applying for a heritage permit. heritage protections registered to the individual These include: property. While other heritage protections may apply to specific interior or exterior portions of the − Painting of wood, stucco or metal finishes property that are not visible from the public realm, this Plan does not apply to the alteration of interiors − Repair of existing features, including roofs, wall or to exteriors that cannot be seen from the public cladding, dormers, cresting, cupolas, cornices, realm. brackets, columns, balustrades, porches and steps, entrances, windows, foundations, and Section 11.1 of this Plan includes a list of minor decorative wood, metal, stone or terra cotta, alterations that do not require a heritage permit provided that they are repaired in kind within the District. − Installation of eavestroughs

− Weatherproofing, including installation of removable storm windows and doors, caulking, and weatherstripping

− Installation of exterior lights

− Temporary commercial signage (ie. ‘sale’ sign in a window display)

− Maintenance of existing features

− Landscaping (hard and soft) that does not require subsurface excavation/grade changes

− Repair of existing utilities or public works

− Temporary or seasonal installations, such as planters, patios and seasonal decorations

Although a heritage permit is not required for the above classes of alterations, property owners and tenants are encouraged to conform to the spirit and intent of the Plan for all work undertaken on their properties. City Of Toronto June 2017 132 11.3 HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Heritage Permit Process The City of Toronto’s Official Plan states that a Applicant Meeting with City Staff Heritage Impact Assessment may be requested for (recommended) development proposals on any property that is listed on the Heritage Register; this includes any property Heritage Permit Application Made within the District. A Heritage Impact Assessment will be required to accompany any applications for a For any work requiring the issuance Procedures | King-Spadina HCD Plan of a Building Permit, when issued, zoning by-law amendment, Official Plan amendment, is deemed to include the Heritage consent to sever or site plan agreement. The Heritage Permit and no separate or additional Impact Assessment must be prepared by a qualified permit will be required heritage professional. The purpose of a Heritage Impact Assessment is to describe and assess the Staff Review existing physical condition of a heritage resource, Staff works with applicant and the potential for the restoration and reuse of the advises on how to comply with the heritage resource, and how the proposed alteration HCD Plan or development conserves the heritage resource. For additions to contributing and non-contributing Work Complies Work Does Not Comply properties: with HCD Plan with HCD Plan (circulated to local HCD “The City of Toronto may require heritage impact assessments for additions to contributing (also Staff Issues advisory committee) Heritage Permit for non) properties to determine the impact of the addition on the cultural heritage value and Toronto Preservation Board [heritage] attributes of the district.” Meeting & Decision For demolitions: Community Council “A heritage impact assessment will be required Meeting & Decision to determine the impact of replacement buildings on the cultural heritage value and [heritage] Council attributes of the district.” Meeting & Decision For new development:

“A heritage impact assessment may be required Council Council Doesn't Approves Work Approve Work to determine the impact of new buildings and structures on the cultural heritage value and [heritage] attributes of the district.” Applicant can appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board

133 11.4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

11.4.1 General Archaeological Potential Areas 11.4.2 Toronto General Hospital Archaeologically Sensitive Area For contributing and non-contributing properties within areas of general archaeological potential, soil As a heritage attribute of the District, any actions disturbance activities associated with large scale that will affect the Toronto General Hospital Archaeo- development, such as applications under the Plan- logically Sensitive Area must be completed under a

Procedures | Garden District Hcd Plan ning Act, will be subject to archaeological review by heritage permit issued under Part V of the OHA. As City staff and an archaeological assessment will be laid out by the City of Toronto’s HCDs in Toronto, ac- required prior to any on-site work. tions within the Archaeologically Sensitive Area that require a heritage permit include, but are not limited Furthermore, proposed small-scale alterations to to: contributing properties and non-contributing prop- erties will be subject to archaeological review by − Installation of patios and deck footings, fences, City staff and an archaeological assessment may be pools, sheds and other outbuildings required prior to any on-site work that involves: − Major landscaping, including all soil disturbances − Additions to existing structures requiring subsur- beyond minor gardening face disturbances − Excavation for below grade utilities − New structures/installations in open space areas within other part(s) of the property requiring − Site grading subsurface disturbances − Work on new driveways and sidewalks − Foundation repair/alteration to existing buildings Site alteration also includes any construction activi- − New service hook ups or repairs to a building ties requiring permits or approvals under provincial frontage with a minimal setback and originating legislation, such as the Planning Act or the Building from the adjacent right-of-way Code Act.

− New service hook ups or repairs to a building set In addition to obtaining a permit under Part V of the back from the right-of-way of origin OHA for any archaeological sites or resources identi- fied as heritage attributes of a District, the proce- − Landscape alterations requiring subsurface exca- dures for archaeology identified within the Archaeo- vation/grade changes. logical Management Plan must also be adhered to where they apply. Not all properties necessarily require review and/or assessment for all types of identified alterations (see Section 10.1). City Of Toronto June 2017 134 11.4.3 Victoria Memorial Square Archaeologically Sensitive Area As a heritage attribute of the District, any actions that will affect the Victoria Memorial Square Archaeologi- cally Sensitive Area must be completed under a heri- tage permit issued under Part V of the OHA. As laid Procedures | King-Spadina HCD Plan out by the City of Toronto’s HCDs in Toronto, actions within the ASA that require a heritage permit include, but are not limited to:

− Installation of patios and deck footings, fences, pools, sheds and other outbuildings

− Major landscaping, including all soil disturbances beyond minor gardening

− Excavation for below grade utilities

− Site grading

− Work on new driveways and sidewalks

Site alteration also includes any construction activi- ties requiring permits or approvals under provincial legislation, such as the Planning Act or the Building Code Act.

In addition to obtaining a permit under Part V of the OHA for any archaeological sites or resources identified as attributes of a District, the procedures for archaeology identified within the Archaeological Management Plan must also be adhered to where they apply.

135

12.0 Recommendations Recommendations | King-Spadina HCD Plan

12.1 Periodic Review 12.2 Heritage Awareness and Implementation

137 12.1 PERIODIC REVIEW 12.2 HERITAGE AWARENESS AND IMPLEMENTATION

It is recommended that the City undertake a review It is recommended that, following the approval of of the King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District this Plan, City staff and the community meet to Plan and its objectives no more than ten years after discuss the potential creation of an HCD Advisory it has come into force. The failure to review the Committee. The Advisory Committee will serve as a contents of the Plan within the recommended review conduit for community based feedback to the City period will in no way invalidate the Plan or its ability regarding the consistency of heritage permit applica- to be enforced. tions with the policies and guidelines of this Plan, A preliminary review may be initiated by the City, and may also assist owners in understanding how who will initiate the review in coordination with the to follow the policies and guidelines when plan- Recommendations | King-Spadina HCD Plan local HCD advisory committee, if applicable. If the ning alterations to properties within the District. The preliminary review determines that changes to the Advisory Committee will provide valuable input in Plan are required then an in-depth review will be decisions under the OHA, however it will not have the completed to determine the specific nature and con- authority to issue permits or exemptions to the HCD tent of changes to the Plan. An outside consultant Plan requirements, or to override decisions made by may be retained for the purpose of a complete the City staff or Council. intensive review. The City will provide a draft terms of reference for Changes to this Plan must be carefully considered, the Advisory Committee based upon that provided in and only undertaken in the spirit of conservation HCDs in Toronto, and modified as appropriate to re- which informed its preparation. Where Council ac- flect the unique stakeholder and community interests cepts recommended changes to the Plan it will do so within the District. through an amendment to this Plan and its by-law. The enactment of this Plan is an opportunity to facilitate heritage awareness within the District as it relates to heritage conservation. City staff will work with BIAs, residents associations, the councillor’s office, and other community members to increase awareness of the benefits of heritage conservation within the District, and to facilitate access to incen- tives available to owners of contributing properties. City staff may use the Plan to inform other City initiatives, including but not limited to culture and economic development. City Of Toronto June 2017 138 Recommendations | King-Spadina HCD Plan

139

Appendices E. ListofNon-ContributingProperties StatementsofContribution D. C. B. A. Heritage Index ofContributingProperties Definitions Incentives 141

Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan A. DEFINITIONS

Accessibility: The degree to which an historic place Combined Property: A property that contains both is easy to access by as many people as possible, contributing and non-contributing properties due to including people with disabilities. the consolidation of two properties, or a contributing property that contains significant vacant space, in Addition: New construction that extends an existing addition to buildings or structures. building’s envelope in any direction, and which

Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan increases the building’s existing volume. Complement: To physically and visually conserve or enhance the cultural heritage value and heritage Adjacent: Lands adjoining a property on the Heritage attributes of the District in regard to alterations, Register or lands that are directly across from additions and new development. To be physically and near to a property on the Heritage Register complementary refers to the use of materials and and separated by land used as a private or public construction methods that do not detract from road, highway, street, lane, trail, right-of-way, or damage heritage attributes. To be visually walkway, green space, park and/or easement, or complementary refers to the selection of materials an intersection of any of these; whose location has and design, massing, proportions and details so the potential to have an impact on a property on the as to conserve and enhance the District’s cultural Heritage Register. heritage value. Complementary and complement Alteration: To change a property on the Heritage have corresponding meanings. Register in any manner, including restoration, Conservation: The identification, protection, renovation, repair or disturbance, or a change, management and use of built heritage resources, demolition or removal of an adjacent property cultural heritage landscapes and archaeological that may result in any change to a property on resources in a manner that ensures their cultural the Heritage Register. Alteration and alter have heritage value is retained under the Ontario Heritage corresponding meanings. Act. Conservation can include preservation, Archaeological Resources: Artifacts, archaeological rehabilitation, restoration, or a combination of these sites, and marine archaeological sites. The conservation treatments. Conservation and conserve identification and evaluation of such resources is have corresponding meanings. based upon archaeological field work undertaken in Conservation Process: As defined by the Standards accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act. and Guidelines, the sequential process of Character Sub-Area: A geographic area within the understanding, planning and intervening required District that is a component part of the District and when undertaking conservation projects. that contributes to the District’s cultural heritage Conservation Treatments: The actions of value while retaining unique heritage attributes that preservation, rehabilitation, and restoration as reflects a distinct character. defined by the Standards and Guidelines to be used individually or in combination when undertaking conservation projects. City Of Toronto June 2017 142 Contributing Property: A property, structure, Integrity: A measure of the wholeness and intactness landscape element or other feature of an HCD that of the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes supports the identified significant cultural heritage of a contributing property or the District. value, heritage attribute and integrity of the District. Maintenance: Routine, cyclical, non-destructive Cultural Heritage Value: The aesthetic, historic, actions necessary to slow the deterioration of an scientific, cultural, social or spiritual importance or historic place. It entails periodic inspection; routine, Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan significance for past, present and future generations. cyclical, non-destructive cleaning; minor repair The cultural heritage value of an historic place and refinishing operations and the replacement is embodied in its heritage attributes and its of damaged or deteriorated materials that are character-defining materials, forms, location, spatial impractical to save. Maintenance and maintain have configurations, uses and cultural associations or corresponding meanings. meanings. Monitoring: The systematic and regular inspection Demolition: The complete destruction of a heritage or measurement of the condition of the materials structure or property from its site, including the and elements of an historic place to determine disassembly of structures and properties on the their behaviour, performance, and rate of Heritage Register for the purpose of reassembly deterioration over time. Monitoring and monitor have at a later date. Demolition and demolish have corresponding meanings. corresponding meanings. Network of Laneways: The historic and existing Guideline: Recommended methods of achieving an system of service access, pedestrian and mid-block associated policy. connections within the District.

Heritage Attributes: In relation to real property, New Development: new construction and/or and to the buildings and structures on the real additions to existing buildings or structures. property, the attributes of the property, buildings and structures that contribute to their cultural heritage Non-Contributing Property: A property, structure, value. These include the materials, forms, location, landscape element or feature of the District that spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations does not reflect the District’s cultural heritage value, or meanings that contribute to the cultural heritage heritage attributes and integrity. value of an historic place, which must be retained Policy: A rule for managing change on properties to preserve its cultural heritage value. They also in order to conserve the District’s cultural heritage includes the elements, features and building value and heritage attributes. components that hold up, support or protect the heritage values and attributes and without which the Preservation: The action or process of protecting, heritage values and attributes may be at risk. maintaining, and/or stabilizing the existing materials, form, and integrity of a historic place or of an individual component, while protecting its heritage value. Preservation and preserve have corresponding meanings.

143 Primary Structure: The main structure of a Step back: the measure by which a portion of a contributing property, in three dimensions, building mass above grade level is recessed from the notwithstanding additions that are not visible wall of the building directly below. from the public realm or that are unrelated to the property’s Statement of Contribution. Streetwall: The streetwall is the portion(s) of a building immediately fronting onto a street, forming

Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Property: real property, including all buildings and a built form edge to the adjacent right-of-way. structures thereof. Three-Dimensional Integrity: A building in three Public realm: Any public space, including but not dimensions, on all of its sides including its roof limited to: streets, sidewalks, laneways, parks, and planes. privately owned publically-accessible open spaces, walkways or easements.

Rehabilitation: The action or process of making possible a continuing or compatible contemporary use of a historic place or an individual component, while protecting its cultural heritage value.

Removal: The complete and permanent dislocation of a building or structure from its property to another property.

Relocation: The dislocation of a building from one portion of a property and placement on to another part of the property.

Repair: Maintenance-type work that does not require a significant material change and that has no negative impact on the property’s integrity.

Restoration: The action or process of accurately revealing, recovering or representing the state of a historic place or of an individual component, as it appeared at a particular period in its history, while protecting its cultural heritage value. Restoration and restore have corresponding meanings.

Setback: A horizontal distance measured at a right angle from any lot line to the nearest part of the main wall of a building or structure. City Of Toronto June 2017 144 B. HERITAGE INCENTIVES

Incentive programs from all levels of government are critical conservation tools. They can provide funding support for property owners who are conserving their properties, often at considerable expense.

The City of Toronto offers two heritage incentive

programs to assist owners of eligible heritage Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan properties with the cost of conservation: the Toronto Heritage Grant Program, and the Toronto Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program. Beyond providing funding support, these programs assist successful applicants in reaching the highest conservation standards possible for their projects.

The Toronto Heritage Grant Program provides matching grant funds for eligible heritage conservation work to owners of properties that are designated under Part IV or Part V of the OHA. The program receives stable annual funding; at the time of writing, funding is at just over $300,000 annually. Revisions to the program in 2015 have updated eligibility for the program to include residential and tax-exempt properties exclusively.

The Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program offers a tax rebate of 40% of taxes paid on the portions of eligible properties that have been identified as attributes in a Heritage Easement Agreement. Revisions to the program in 2015 updated eligibility to include commercial or industrial properties exclusively, including properties within Heritage Conservation Districts. This update included revisions that recalculate rebates to provide matching funds for eligible conservation work. The provincial government shares the cost of rebates with the City according to the education portion of the property taxes.

145 C. INDEX OF CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area Heritage Status 1 1 Adelaide Place St. Andrew’s Intention to designate 2 3 Adelaide Place St. Andrew’s Intention to designate 3 5 Adelaide Place St. Andrew’s Intention to designate 4 7 Adelaide Place St. Andrew’s Intention to designate 5 9 Adelaide Place St. Andrew’s Intention to designate 6 11 Adelaide Place St. Andrew’s Intention to designate 7 200 Adelaide Street West Listed

Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 8 208 Adelaide Street West 9 212 Adelaide Street West 10 224 Adelaide Street West 11 244 Adelaide Street West Duncan Street 12 257 Adelaide Street West 13 263 Adelaide Street West Listed 14 266 Adelaide Street West Part IV 15 268 Adelaide Street West Part IV 16 270 Adelaide Street West Part IV 17 295 Adelaide Street West Part IV 18 302 Adelaide Street West 19 304 Adelaide Street West 20 306 Adelaide Street West 21 308 Adelaide Street West 22 312 Adelaide Street West 23 317 Adelaide Street West Part IV 24 331 Adelaide Street West Listed 25 342 Adelaide Street West Listed 26 345 Adelaide Street West Listed 27 350 Adelaide Street West 28 352 Adelaide Street West 29 355 Adelaide Street West 30 358 Adelaide Street West Listed 31 366 Adelaide Street West Listed 32 379 Adelaide Street West Listed 33 380 Adelaide Street West City Of Toronto June 2017 146 Index of Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area Heritage Status 34 383 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 35 384 Adelaide Street West Listed 36 445 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 37 447 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 38 449 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 39 450 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 40 451 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s

41 453 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 42 487 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 43 490 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 44 497 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s Part IV 45 499 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s Part IV 46 504 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 47 505 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s Intention to designate 48 506 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 49 507 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s Intention to designate 50 509 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s Intention to designate 51 511 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s Intention to designate 52 512 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 53 514 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 54 47 Bathurst Street Listed 55 51 Bathurst Street Part IV 56 125 Bathurst Street Part IV 57 129 Bathurst Street 58 131 Bathurst Street 59 133 Bathurst Street 60 135 Bathurst Street 61 137 Bathurst Street 62 139 Bathurst Street 63 141 Bathurst Street 64 159 Bathurst Street 65 161 Bathurst Street 66 20 Brant Street St. Andrew’s Listed

147 Index of Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area Heritage Status 67 25 Brant Street 68 8 Camden Street 69 12 Camden Street St. Andrew’s 70 18 Camden Street St. Andrew’s 71 20 Camden Street St. Andrew’s 72 35 Camden Street St. Andrew’s 73 38 Camden Street St. Andrew’s

Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 74 45 Camden Street St. Andrew’s 75 47 Camden Street St. Andrew’s 76 19 Charlotte Street 77 5 Clarence Square Wellington Place Listed 78 6 Clarence Square Wellington Place Listed 79 7 Clarence Square Wellington Place Listed 80 8 Clarence Square Wellington Place Listed 81 9 Clarence Square Wellington Place Listed 82 10 Clarence Square Wellington Place Listed 83 11 Clarence Square Wellington Place Listed 84 12 Clarence Square Wellington Place Listed 85 13 Clarence Square Wellington Place Listed 86 14 Clarence Square Wellington Place Listed 87 15 Clarence Square Wellington Place Listed 88 16 Clarence Square Wellington Place Listed 89 11 Duncan Street Duncan Street 90 14 Duncan Street Duncan Street Listed 91 15 Duncan Street Duncan Street Listed 92 19 Duncan Street Duncan Street Part IV 93 20 Duncan Street Duncan Street Listed 94 30 Duncan Street Duncan Street 95 109 John Street Part IV 96 111 John Street Part IV 97 113 John Street Part IV 98 115 John Street Part IV 99 117 John Street Part IV City Of Toronto June 2017 148 Index of Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area Heritage Status 100 119 John Street Part IV 101 121 John Street Part IV 102 122 John Street 103 123 John Street Part IV 104 125 John Street Part IV 105 127 John Street Part IV 106 129 John Street Part IV

107 133 John Street Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 108 212 King Street West Part IV 109 214 King Street West Part IV 110 220 King Street West Part IV 111 260 King Street West Part IV 112 266 King Street West Duncan Street Part IV 113 276 King Street West Duncan Street Part IV 114 284 King Street West Part IV 115 287 King Street West Part IV 116 291 King Street West Part IV 117 293 King Street West Part IV 118 295 King Street West Part IV 119 297 King Street West Part IV 120 299 King Street West Part IV 121 300 King Street West Part IV 122 301 King Street West Part IV 123 305 King Street West 124 315 King Street West Part IV 125 319 King Street West Part IV 126 321 King Street West Part IV 127 322 King Street West Part IV 128 325 King Street West Part IV 129 327 King Street West Part IV 130 355 King Street West Part IV 131 387 King Street West 132 388 King Street West

149 Index of Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area Heritage Status 133 389 King Street West 134 391 King Street West 135 401 King Street West Listed 136 431 King Street West Spadina Avenue Listed 137 441 King Street West Listed 138 445 King Street West Listed 139 455 King Street West Listed

Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 140 460 King Street West Spadina Avenue Listed 141 461 King Street West Listed 142 468 King Street West Listed 143 469 King Street West Listed 144 485 King Street West Intention to designate 145 489 King Street West Part IV 146 495 King Street West 147 500 King Street West Listed 148 511 King Street West Part IV 149 519 King Street West 150 521 King Street West 151 523 King Street West 152 527 King Street West 153 529 King Street West 154 544 King Street West 155 545 King Street West 156 557 King Street West 157 565 King Street West 158 567 King Street West 159 569 King Street West 160 570 King Street West Part IV 161 571 King Street West 162 573 King Street West 163 578 King Street West Listed 164 579 King Street West 165 581 King Street West City Of Toronto June 2017 150 Index of Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area Heritage Status 166 582 King Street West Listed 167 583 King Street West 168 600 King Street West Listed 169 602 King Street West Part IV 170 603 King Street West 171 613 King Street West 172 615 King Street West

173 617 King Street West Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 174 619 King Street West 175 624 King Street West 176 626 King Street West 177 642 King Street West 178 662 King Street West Listed 179 663 King Street West Listed 180 668 King Street West Listed 181 20 Maud Street St. Andrew’s 182 29 Nelson Street Duncan Street Listed 183 10 Niagara Street Wellington Place Listed 184 158 Pearl Street Listed 185 77 Peter Street 186 82 Peter Street 187 118 Peter Street 188 120 Peter Street 189 122 Peter Street Intention to designate 190 124 Peter Street Intention to designate 191 134 Peter Street 192 67 Portland Street 193 98 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 194 102 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 195 105 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 196 107 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 197 124 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 198 126 Portland Street St. Andrew’s

151 Index of Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area Heritage Status 199 127 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 200 128 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 201 130 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 202 135 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 203 139 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 204 141 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 205 143 Portland Street St. Andrew’s

Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 206 145 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 207 205 Richmond Street West Duncan Street 208 221 Richmond Street West Duncan Street 209 240 Richmond Street West Duncan Street 210 241 Richmond Street West 211 250 Richmond Street West Duncan Street 212 259 Richmond Street West Part IV 213 260 Richmond Street West Part IV 214 269 Richmond Street West 215 275 Richmond Street West 216 277 Richmond Street West 217 296 Richmond Street West 218 304 Richmond Street West 219 340 Richmond Street West 220 357 Richmond Street West Intention to designate 221 359 Richmond Street West Intention to designate 222 364 Richmond Street West 223 372 Richmond Street West 224 401 Richmond Street West Part IV 225 457 Richmond Street West St. Andrew’s 226 460 Richmond Street West 227 474 Richmond Street West 228 476 Richmond Street West 229 478 Richmond Street West 230 497 Richmond Street West St. Andrew’s Part IV 231 530 Richmond Street West City Of Toronto June 2017 152 Index of Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area Heritage Status 232 532 Richmond Street West 233 534 Richmond Street West 234 536 Richmond Street West 235 538 Richmond Street West 236 540 Richmond Street West Listed 237 542 Richmond Street West Listed 238 544 Richmond Street West

239 579 Richmond Street West St. Andrew’s Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 240 600 Richmond Street West 241 602 Richmond Street West 242 620 Richmond Street West 243 100 Simcoe Street Listed 244 24 Spadina Avenue Wellington Place Listed 245 25 Spadina Avenue Wellington Place Intention to designate 246 46 Spadina Avenue Wellington Place Listed 247 49 Spadina Avenue Wellington Place Listed 248 57 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 249 82 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue Listed 250 96 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue Listed 251 99 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 252 110 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue Listed 253 116 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 254 117 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue Listed 255 126 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue Listed 256 129 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 257 147 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 258 46 Stewart Street 259 48 Stewart Street 260 50 Stewart Street 261 52 Stewart Street 262 54 Stewart Street 263 56 Stewart Street 264 60 Stewart Street

153 Index of Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area Heritage Status 265 374 Wellington Street West Wellington Place 266 376 Wellington Street West Wellington Place 267 420 Wellington Street West Wellington Place 268 422 Wellington Street West Wellington Place Listed 269 424 Wellington Street West Wellington Place Listed 270 436 Wellington Street West Wellington Place Part IV 271 462 Wellington Street West Wellington Place Listed

Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 272 467 Wellington Street West Wellington Place 273 468 Wellington Street West Wellington Place Listed 274 482 Wellington Street West Wellington Place Listed 275 488 Wellington Street West Wellington Place Listed 276 517 Wellington Street West Wellington Place Part IV 277 518 Wellington Street West Wellington Place Listed 278 520 Wellington Street West Wellington Place Listed 279 10 Widmer Street Listed 280 12 Widmer Street Listed 281 14 Widmer Street Listed 282 16 Widmer Street Listed 283 18 Widmer Street Listed 284 20 Widmer Street Listed

Total 284 Heritage Register 139 - Listed 70 - Part IV 53 City Of Toronto June 2017 154 D. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION STYLE Commercial Second Empire Second Empire Second Empire Second Empire Second Empire Second Empire Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. CHARACTER 1913 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION

Total 284 Listed

Heritage Register 139 STATUS designate designate designate designate designate designate Intention to Intention to Intention to Intention to Intention to Intention to - Listed 70 - Part IV 53 ADDRESS 1 Adelaide Place 3 Adelaide Place 5 Adelaide Place 7 Adelaide Place 9 Adelaide Place Adelaide Place 11 200 Adelaide Street West KEY IMAGE KEY

155 Statement of Contribution Altered STYLE Commercial Commercial Commercial Edwardian Classical Queen Anne Revival High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER Duncan Street 1923 1910 1910 1915 1855 1880 1892 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Part IV STATUS - ADDRESS 208 Adelaide Street (including 210 West Adelaide Street West) 212 Adelaide Street West 224 Adelaide Street West 244 Adelaide Street (including 24 Dun West can Street) 257 Adelaide Street (including 255, 259 West Adelaide Street and 261 West) 263 Adelaide Street (including 263-267 West Adelaide Street West) 266 Adelaide Street West KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 156 Statement of Contribution STYLE Gothic Revival Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1892 1892 1868 1889 1889 1889 1889 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Part IV Part IV Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 268 Adelaide Street West 270 Adelaide Street West 295 Adelaide Street West 302 Adelaide Street West 304 Adelaide Street West 306 Adelaide Street (including 306A West Adelaide Street West) 308 Adelaide Street (including 308B, West 310 Adelaide Street West) KEY IMAGE KEY

157 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Art Moderne Second Empire Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1912 1858 1914 1929 1929 1940 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Listed Listed Part IV STATUS 1/2 ADDRESS 312 Adelaide Street (including 316, 320 West Adelaide Street West) 317 Adelaide Street (including 325 West Adelaide Street West) 331 Adelaide Street (including 333 West Adelaide Street West) 342 Adelaide Street (including 342 West Adelaide Street West) 345 Adelaide Street (including West 349 Ade - laide Street West) 350 Adelaide Street West KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 158 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Art Moderne Conservative Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1930 1920 1925 1920 1912 1929 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Listed Listed STATUS ADDRESS 352 Adelaide Street West 355 Adelaide Street West 358 Adelaide Street (including West 360 Ade - laide Street West) 366 Adelaide Street West 379 Adelaide Street (including 379A, West Adelaide 379C and 381 Street West) 380 Adelaide Street West KEY IMAGE KEY

159 Statement of Contribution Altered Altered Altered STYLE Art Moderne Edwardian Classical High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA St. Andrew’s St. St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. CHARACTER 1922 1909 1945 1880 1905 1906 1906 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Social/Community Listed STATUS ADDRESS 383 Adelaide Street (including West 385 Ade - laide Street West) 384 Adelaide Street West 445 Adelaide Street West 447 Adelaide Street West 449 Adelaide Street West 450 Adelaide Street Andrew’s (St. West Playground) 451 Adelaide Street West KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 160 Statement of Contribution Altered Altered STYLE Conservative Mid-Century Modern Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Renaissance Revival High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential Commercial Row Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. CHARACTER 1906 1951 1910 1905 1905 1880 1880 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Part IV Part IV STATUS designate Intention to ADDRESS 453 Adelaide Street West 487 Adelaide Street (including 493 West Adelaide Street West) 490 Adelaide Street West 497 Adelaide Street West 499 Adelaide Street West 504 Adelaide Street Port - (including 116 West land Street) 505 Adelaide Street West KEY IMAGE KEY

161 Statement of Contribution Altered STYLE Conservative Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Renaissance Revival High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. CHARACTER 1912 1870 1880 1880 1880 1880 1880 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed STATUS designate designate designate Intention to Intention to Intention to ADDRESS 506 Adelaide Street West 507 Adelaide Street West 509 Adelaide Street West Adelaide Street 511 West 512 Adelaide Street West 514 Adelaide Street West 47 Bathurst Street (including 49 Bathurst Street) KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 162 Statement of Contribution STYLE Contemporary Second Empire Second Empire Edwardian Classical Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 2013 1869 1890 1890 1890 1890 1890 1890 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Part IV Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 51 Bathurst Street 125 Bathurst Street 129 Bathurst Street 131 Bathurst Street 133 Bathurst Street 135 Bathurst Street 137 Bathurst Street 139 Bathurst Street KEY IMAGE KEY

163 Statement of Contribution Altered STYLE Revival Conservative Conservative Renaissance Edwardian Classical Mid-Century Modern Mid-Century Modern Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan N/A Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. St. Andrew’s St. CHARACTER 1910 1920 1950 1950 1900 1870 1870 1926 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed STATUS ADDRESS 141 Bathurst Street (including 581 Richmond Street West) 159 Bathurst Street 161 Bathurst Street 20 Brant Street 25 Brant Street 8 Camden Street 12 Camden Street 18 Camden Street KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 164 Statement of Contribution STYLE Conservative Second Empire Second Empire Mid-Century Modern Mid-Century Modern Mid-Century Modern Mid-Century Modern Mid-Century Modern Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

Place Place Wellington Wellington Wellington SUB-AREA St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. CHARACTER 1950 1950 1950 1950 1950 1909 1880 1880 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Listed STATUS ADDRESS 20 Camden Street 35 Camden Street 38 Camden Street (including 40 Camden Street) 45 Camden Street 47 Camden Street 19 Charlotte Street 5 Clarence Square 6 Clarence Square KEY IMAGE KEY

165 Statement of Contribution STYLE Second Empire Second Empire Second Empire Second Empire Second Empire Second Empire Second Empire Second Empire Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential BUILDING TYPOLOGY

Place Place Place Place Place Place Place Place Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1880 1880 1880 1880 1880 1880 1880 1880 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Listed Listed Listed Listed Listed Listed Listed STATUS ADDRESS 7 Clarence Square 8 Clarence Square 9 Clarence Square 10 Clarence Square Clarence Square 11 12 Clarence Square 13 Clarence Square 14 Clarence Square KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 166 Statement of Contribution - vival STYLE Commercial Commercial Conservative Conservative Conservative Conservative Second Empire Second Empire Renaissance Re Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

Place Place Wellington Wellington Wellington SUB-AREA CHARACTER Duncan Street Duncan Street Duncan Street Duncan Street Duncan Street Duncan Street 1925 1899 1900 1908 1833 1926 1880 1880 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Listed Listed Listed Listed Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 15 Clarence Square Clarence (including 15A Square) 16 Clarence Square Duncan Street 11 14 Duncan Street (in - cluding 180, 184 and 188 Pearl Street) 15 Duncan Street (in - cluding 166 Pearl Street) 19 Duncan Street (including 219 and 223 Adelaide Street West) 20 Duncan Street (including 18 and 22 Duncan Street) 30 Duncan Street (including 34 Duncan Street) KEY IMAGE KEY

167 Statement of Contribution STYLE Second Empire Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1892 1892 1892 1892 1892 1892 1892 1885 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 109 John Street John Street 111 John Street 113 John Street 115 John Street 117 John Street 119 121 John Street 122 John Street (in - John Street cluding 118 Adelaide Street and 284 West) KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 168 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Commercial Second Empire Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1892 1892 1892 1892 1879 1907 1917 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 123 John Street 125 John Street 127 John Street 129 John Street 133 John Street 212 King Street West 214 King Street West (including 218 King Street West) KEY IMAGE KEY

169 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Commercial Second Empire Classical Revival Edwardian Classical Edwardian Classical Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER Duncan Street Duncan Street 1907 1909 1904 1907 1915 1880 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Social/Community Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV STATUS - ADDRESS 220 King Street West 260 King Street West 266 King Street West (including 268-270 King Street West) 276 King Street West (including 274 King and 8 Dun Street West can Street) 284 King Street West King (including 284A 171 and Street West, 173 Pearl Street) 287 King Street West (including 289 King Street West) KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 170 Statement of Contribution STYLE Contemporary Mid-Century Modern Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1993 1875 1875 1876 1876 1876 1886 1940 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Social/Community Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 291 King Street West King (including 291A Street West) 293 King Street West 295 King Street West 297 King Street West 299 King Street West King (including 299A Street West) 300 King Street West 301 King Street West (including 303 King Street West) 305 King Street West (including 309 and 311 King Street West) KEY IMAGE KEY

171 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Conservative Conservative Conservative Edwardian Classical Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1903 1927 1884 1858 1858 1858 1886 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 315 King Street West 319 King Street West 321 King Street West 322 King Street West 325 King Street West (including 323 and 325A King Street West) 327 King Street West (including 333 King Street West) 355 King Street West KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 172 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Commercial Art Moderne Second Empire Second Empire Second Empire Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

Avenue Spadina SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1905 1908 1880 1940 1880 1880 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Listed STATUS ADDRESS 387 King Street West 388 King Street West (including 70 and 80 Peter Street) 389 King Street West 391 King Street West 401 King Street West (including 407 and 409 King Street West) 431 King Street West (including 425, 433, 435 and 439 King Street West) KEY IMAGE KEY

173 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Second Empire Edwardian Classical Edwardian Classical Edwardian Classical Edwardian Classical Edwardian Classical Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

Avenue Spadina SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1906 1906 1904 1901 1913 1907 1875 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Listed Listed Listed Listed Listed Listed STATUS ADDRESS 441 King Street West (including 443 King Street West) 445 King Street West (including 447 King Street West) 455 King Street West 460 King Street West (including 72, 74 and 76 Spadina Avenue) 461 King Street West (including 463 King and 418 Street West Street West) Wellington 468 King Street West (including 474 King Street West) 469 King Street West and (including 469A 469B King Street West) KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 174 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Conservative Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1882 1920 1900 1872 1893 1885 1885 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Part IV Part IV STATUS designate Intention to ADDRESS 485 King Street West 489 King Street West 495 King Street West 500 King Street West Brant (including 1 and 11 Street, 494, 510, 520 and 522 King Street West) King Street West 511 519 King Street West 521 King Street West KEY IMAGE KEY

175 Statement of Contribution - STYLE Conservative Conservative Re naissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1925 1920 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION STATUS ADDRESS 523 King Street West (including 525 King Street West) 527 King Street West 529 King Street West 544 King Street West 545 King Street West 557 King Street West (including 563 King Street West) 565 King Street West KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 176 Statement of Contribution STYLE Georgian Conservative Conservative Period Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Row Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1904 1885 1885 1882 1885 1885 1885 1910 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 567 King Street West 569 King Street West 570 King Street West (including 572 King Street West) 571 King Street West 573 King Street West 578 King Street West (including 580 King Street West) 579 King Street West 581 King Street West KEY IMAGE KEY

177 Statement of Contribution - vival STYLE Art Moderne Conservative Conservative Period Revival Renaissance Re Edwardian Classical Edwardian Classical Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Commercial Row Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1902 1900 1904 1910 1945 1910 1900 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Listed Listed Listed Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 582 King Street West (including 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West, and 592 King 590, 590A Street West) 582 King Street West (including 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West, and 592 King 590, 590A Street West) 582 King Street West (including 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West, and 592 King 590, 590A Street West) 583 King Street West (including 585 King and 87 Street West Portland Street) 600 King Street West 602 King Street West (including 604 and 606 86, 90 King Street West, and 96 Portland Street) 603 King Street West KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 178 Statement of Contribution Altered STYLE Conservative Edwardian Classical Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1915 1925 1885 1919 1880 1880 1930 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION STATUS ADDRESS 613 King Street West 615 King Street West 617 King Street West 619 King Street West 624 King Street West 626 King Street West (including 628 King Street West) 642 King Street West (including 2 and 4 Adelaide Place) KEY IMAGE KEY

179 Statement of Contribution Park STYLE Conservative Conservative Edwardian Classical Edwardian Classical Edwardian Classical Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

Place Wellington Wellington SUB-AREA St. Andrew’s St. CHARACTER Duncan Street 1793 1904 1900 1920 1910 1900 1902 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Social/Community Listed Listed Listed Listed Listed Listed STATUS

ADDRESS 662 King Street West 663 King Street West (including 69, 71 and 73 Bathurst Street, 663 King Street West) 668 King Street West (including 91 Bathurst Street) 20 Maud Street (including 30 Maud Street) 29 Nelson Street 10 Niagara Street Memorial (Victoria Square) 158 Pearl Street (including 154 Pearl Street) KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 180 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Commercial Conservative Second Empire Second Empire Renaissance Revival High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1920 1929 1910 1879 1879 1879 1879 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION STATUS designate designate Intention to Intention to

ADDRESS 77 Peter Street 82 Peter Street Peter Street 118 120 Peter Street 122 Peter Street 124 Peter Street 134 Peter Street (including 138 Peter Street) KEY IMAGE KEY

181 Statement of Contribution Altered Altered STYLE Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Commercial Row Commercial Row BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. CHARACTER 1880 1880 1880 1880 1880 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION STATUS ADDRESS 67 Portland Street Portland (including 67A Street) 98 Portland Street 102 Portland Street 105 Portland Street 107 Portland Street KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 182 Statement of Contribution Altered STYLE Conservative Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Renaissance Revival High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Gothic High Victorian - Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan tached Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Semi-De Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA St. Andrew’s St. St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. CHARACTER 1920 1880 1880 1880 1880 1870 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION STATUS ADDRESS 124 Portland Street 126 Portland Street 127 Portland Street 128 Portland Street 130 Portland Street 135 Portland Street KEY IMAGE KEY

183 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Commercial Art Moderne Edwardian Classical High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. Andrew’s St. CHARACTER Duncan Street Duncan Street Duncan Street 1925 1920 1920 1930 1880 1880 1880 1880 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION STATUS ADDRESS 139 Portland Street 141 Portland Street 143 Portland Street 145 Portland Street 205 Richmond Street (including 215 West Richmond Street West, 45 and 47 Duncan Street) 221 Richmond Street (including 225 and West 227 Richmond Street West) 240 Richmond Street (including 57 West Duncan Street) 241 Richmond Street (including 137, West 139, 141 and 145 John Street, 239 Richmond Street West) KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 184 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Commercial Conservative Conservative Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER Duncan Street 1909 1920 1915 1885 1885 1885 1889 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Part IV Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 250 Richmond Street West 259 Richmond Street West 260 Richmond Street West 269 Richmond Street (including 271 and West 273 Richmond Street 62 Widmer Street) West, 275 Richmond Street West 277 Richmond Street West 296 Richmond Street Ade - (including 298 West laide Street West) KEY IMAGE KEY

185 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Period Revival Edwardian Classical Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1920 1920 1910 1885 1885 1885 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION STATUS designate designate Intention to Intention to ADDRESS 304 Richmond Street West 340 Richmond Street West 357 Richmond Street West 359 Richmond Street West 364 Richmond Street (including 370 West Richmond Street West) 372 Richmond Street West KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 186 Statement of Contribution - STYLE Commercial Conservative Re naissance Revival Mid-Century Modern Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA St. Andrew’s St. CHARACTER 1900 1950 1925 1890 1890 1890 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Social/Community Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 401 Richmond Street (including 127A West Spadina Ave) 457 Richmond Street West 460 Richmond Street West 474 Richmond Street West 476 Richmond Street West 478 Richmond Street West KEY IMAGE KEY

187 Statement of Contribution STYLE Art Moderne Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA St. Andrew’s St. CHARACTER 1931 1885 1885 1885 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 497 Richmond Street (including 60 Brant West Street, 17 Maud Richmond 505 and 511 Street West) 530 Richmond Street West 532 Richmond Street West 534 Richmond Street West KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 188 Statement of Contribution STYLE Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1885 1885 1890 1890 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Listed STATUS ADDRESS 536 Richmond Street West 538 Richmond Street West 540 Richmond Street West 542 Richmond Street West KEY IMAGE KEY

189 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Commercial Conservative Queen Anne Revival Renaissance Revival High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Gothic High Victorian Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA St. Andrew’s St. CHARACTER 1911 1920 1890 1875 1875 1909 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed STATUS

ADDRESS (including 203 Adelaide 130 Pearl Street West, 544 Richmond Street West 579 Richmond Street West 600 Richmond Street West 602 Richmond Street West 620 Richmond Street (including 165 and West 167 Bathurst Street, 622, 624 and 626 Richmond Street West) 100 Simcoe Street Street, 90 Simcoe Street) KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 190 Statement of Contribution Park STYLE Commercial Commercial Conservative Conservative Conservative Conservative Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

Place Place Place Place Avenue Avenue Avenue Spadina Spadina Spadina Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1911 1860 1910 1909 1905 1909 1905 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Social/Community Listed Listed Listed Listed Listed STATUS Designate Intention to ADDRESS 24 Avenue Spadina (including 30 Spadina 401 Wellington Avenue, Street West) 25 Avenue Spadina (Clarence Square) 46 Avenue Spadina (including 40, 42, 44 and 50 Spadina Avenue) 49 Avenue Spadina (including 2 Clarence Square) 57 Avenue Spadina (including 59-63 Spadina Avenue) 82 Avenue Spadina (including 80 and 80A Spadina Avenue) 96 Avenue Spadina (including 373 and 375 Adelaide Street West, 100 and 104 Spadina Avenue) KEY IMAGE KEY

191 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Conservative Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

Avenue Avenue Avenue Avenue Avenue Avenue Spadina Spadina Spadina Spadina Spadina Spadina SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1919 1927 1925 1930 1926 1919 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Listed Listed STATUS ADDRESS (in - 99 Avenue Spadina cluding 93, 93A, 95 and 97 Spadina Avenue) Avenue Spadina 110 Spadina (including 112 394 and 398 Avenue, Adelaide Street West) Avenue Spadina 116 (including 124 Spadina Avenue) Avenue Spadina 117 121 and (including 119, Spadina Avenue) 121A 126 Avenue Spadina (including 130, 134, 136, 140 and Spadina 423 and 425 Avenue, 2 Richmond Street West, and 2B Camden Street) 129 Avenue Spadina (including 139 Spadina Avenue) KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 192 Statement of Contribution STYLE Art Moderne Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

Avenue Spadina SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1939 1890 1890 1890 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION STATUS ADDRESS 147 Avenue Spadina (including 412 Richmond Street West) 46 Stewart Street 48 Stewart Street 50 Stewart Street KEY IMAGE KEY

193 Statement of Contribution STYLE Conservative Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

Place Place Wellington Wellington Wellington SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1900 1890 1890 1890 1888 1888 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION STATUS

ADDRESS (including 58 Stewart Street, 647 and 647A King Street West) 52 Stewart Street 54 Stewart Street 56 Stewart Street 60 Stewart Street Street 374 Wellington West Street 376 Wellington West KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 194 Statement of Contribution - vival STYLE Commercial Commercial Commercial Conservative Conservative Renaissance Re Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Renaissance Revival Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

Place Place Place Place Place Place Place Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1909 1916 1880 1915 1915 1885 1885 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Listed Listed Listed Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 420 Wellington Street 420 Wellington West Street 422 Wellington (including 424A West Street East) Wellington Street 424 Wellington (including 424A West Street East) Wellington Street 436 Wellington - (including 438 Wel West lington Street West) Street 462 Wellington West Street 467 Wellington (including 479 West Street West Wellington and 33 Draper Street) Street 468 Wellington (including 470 and West Street 472 Wellington West) KEY IMAGE KEY

195 Statement of Contribution STYLE Commercial Commercial Period Revival Queen Anne Revival Queen Anne Revival Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Commercial Detached Commercial Detached Commercial Detached BUILDING TYPOLOGY

Place Place Place Place Place Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington Wellington SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1909 1907 1909 1891 1891 1876 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Design Design Historical Historical Historical Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Listed Listed Listed Listed Part IV STATUS ADDRESS 482 Wellington Street 482 Wellington West Street 488 Wellington (including 490 West Street West) Wellington Street 517 Wellington (including 495 West Street West, Wellington 31 Portland Street and 510 Front Street West) Street 518 Wellington West Street 520 Wellington West Street 10 Widmer KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 196 Statement of Contribution STYLE Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential Residential Residential Residential BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1876 1876 1876 1876 BUILT

Design Design Design Design Contextual Contextual Contextual Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed Listed Listed Listed STATUS ADDRESS 12 Widmer Street 12 Widmer Street 14 Widmer Street 16 Widmer Street 18 Widmer KEY IMAGE KEY

197 Statement of Contribution STYLE Toronto Bay-n-Gable Toronto Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan Residential BUILDING TYPOLOGY

SUB-AREA CHARACTER 1876 BUILT

Design Contextual CONTRIBUTION Listed STATUS ADDRESS 20 Widmer Street 20 Widmer KEY IMAGE KEY City Of Toronto June 2017 198 E. LIST OF NON-CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area 1 214 Adelaide Street West 2 216 Adelaide Street West 3 217 Adelaide Street West 4 218 Adelaide Street West 5 230 Adelaide Street West 6 236 Adelaide Street West 7 240 Adelaide Street West Duncan Street 8 250 Adelaide Street West Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 9 254 Adelaide Street West 10 260 Adelaide Street West 11 280 Adelaide Street West 12 283 Adelaide Street West 13 313 Adelaide Street West 14 322 Adelaide Street West 15 326 Adelaide Street West 16 328 Adelaide Street West 17 348 Adelaide Street West 18 353 Adelaide Street West 19 354 Adelaide Street West 20 363 Adelaide Street West 21 364 Adelaide Street West 22 387 Adelaide Street West 23 399 Adelaide Street West 24 410 Adelaide Street West 25 422 Adelaide Street West 26 424 Adelaide Street West 27 425 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 28 426 Adelaide Street West 29 428 Adelaide Street West 30 430 Adelaide Street West 31 432 Adelaide Street West 32 434 Adelaide Street West

199 List of Non-Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area 33 438 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 34 440 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 35 443 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 36 444 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 37 461 Adelaide Street West 38 480 Adelaide Street West 39 495 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 40 501 Adelaide Street West St. Andrew’s 41 502 Adelaide Street West 42 508 Adelaide Street West 43 510 Adelaide Street West 44 525 Adelaide Street West 45 530 Adelaide Street West 46 552 Adelaide Street West 47 575 Adelaide Street West 48 552A Adelaide Street West 49 552R Adelaide Street West 50 37 Bathurst Street 51 103 Bathurst Street 52 143 Bathurst Street 53 145 Bathurst Street 54 147 Bathurst Street 55 149 Bathurst Street 56 151 Bathurst Street 57 153 Bathurst Street 58 155 Bathurst Street 59 157 Bathurst Street 60 12 Brant Street 61 19 Brant Street 62 5 Camden Street 63 11 Camden Street 64 15 Camden Street 65 21 Camden Street City Of Toronto June 2017 200 List of Non-Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area 66 23 Camden Street 67 29 Camden Street 68 32 Camden Street 69 39 Camden Street 70 42 Camden Street 71 49 Camden Street St. Andrew’s 72 50 Camden Street St. Andrew’s 73 51 Camden Street St. Andrew’s Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 74 8 Charlotte Street 75 11 Charlotte Street 76 36 Charlotte Street 77 46 Charlotte Street 78 26 Duncan Street Duncan Street 79 86 John Street 80 150 John Street 81 224 King Street West 82 317 King Street West 83 335 King Street West 84 343 King Street West 85 350 King Street West 86 357 King Street West 87 365 King Street West 88 367 King Street West 89 369 King Street West 90 370 King Street West 91 373 King Street West 92 383 King Street West 93 400 King Street West 94 415 King Street West Spadina Avenue 95 438 King Street West Spadina Avenue 96 464 King Street West 97 478 King Street West 98 499 King Street West

201 List of Non-Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area 99 533 King Street West 100 539 King Street West 101 540 King Street West 102 548 King Street West 103 555 King Street West 104 560 King Street West St. Andrew’s 105 577 King Street West Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 106 587 King Street West 107 589 King Street West 108 595 King Street West 109 609 King Street West 110 620 King Street West 111 621 King Street West 112 636 King Street West 113 645 King Street West 114 650 King Street West 115 622A King Street West 116 10 Morrison Street St. Andrew’s 117 21 Nelson Street 118 20 Niagara Street Wellington Place 119 30 Niagara Street Wellington Place 120 38 Niagara Street 121 16 Oxley Street 122 25 Oxley Street 123 150 Pearl Street 124 81 Peter Street 125 87 Peter Street 126 92 Peter Street 127 102 Peter Street 128 108 Peter Street 129 111 Peter Street 130 117 Peter Street 131 126 Peter Street City Of Toronto June 2017 202 List of Non-Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area 132 128 Peter Street 133 129 Peter Street 134 137 Peter Street 135 50 Portland Street Wellington Place 136 66 Portland Street 137 79 Portland Street 138 83 Portland Street 139 85 Portland Street Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 140 100 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 141 101 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 142 104 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 143 109 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 144 115 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 145 119 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 146 120 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 147 121 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 148 122 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 149 123 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 150 125 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 151 132 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 152 137 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 153 147 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 154 156 Portland Street 155 163 Portland Street St. Andrew’s 156 181 Richmond Street West Duncan Street 157 218 Richmond Street West 158 222 Richmond Street West 159 224 Richmond Street West 160 229 Richmond Street West 161 230 Richmond Street West 162 300 Richmond Street West 163 318 Richmond Street West 164 324 Richmond Street West

203 List of Non-Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area 165 326 Richmond Street West 166 328 Richmond Street West 167 388 Richmond Street West 168 431 Richmond Street West 169 435 Richmond Street West 170 438 Richmond Street West 171 444 Richmond Street West Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 172 445 Richmond Street West 173 446 Richmond Street West 174 448 Richmond Street West 175 450 Richmond Street West 176 451 Richmond Street West 177 452 Richmond Street West 178 465 Richmond Street West 179 471 Richmond Street West 180 477 Richmond Street West St. Andrew’s 181 500 Richmond Street West St. Andrew’s 182 520 Richmond Street West St. Andrew’s 183 525 Richmond Street West 184 530R Richmond Street West St. Andrew’s 185 533 Richmond Street West 186 546 Richmond Street West St. Andrew’s 187 548 Richmond Street West St. Andrew’s 188 552 Richmond Street West St. Andrew’s 189 555 Richmond Street West St. Andrew’s 190 556 Richmond Street West St. Andrew’s 191 582 Richmond Street West 192 586 Richmond Street West 193 589 Richmond Street West 194 590 Richmond Street West 195 591 Richmond Street West 196 592 Richmond Street West 197 594 Richmond Street West City Of Toronto June 2017 204 List of Non-Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area 198 596 Richmond Street West 199 598 Richmond Street West 200 604 Richmond Street West 201 608 Richmond Street West 202 610 Richmond Street West 203 612 Richmond Street West 204 614 Richmond Street West 205 616 Richmond Street West Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 206 618 Richmond Street West 207 604R Richmond Street West 208 116 Simcoe Street 209 126 Simcoe Street 210 142 Simcoe Street 211 168 Simcoe Street 212 38 Spadina Avenue Wellington Place 213 55 Spadina Avenue Wellington Place 214 58 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 215 64 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 216 78 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 217 101 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 218 105 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 219 123 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 220 125 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 221 127 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 222 141 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 223 161 Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 224 139A Spadina Avenue Spadina Avenue 225 20 Stewart Street 226 32 Stewart Street 227 380 Wellington Street West Wellington Place 228 400 Wellington Street West Wellington Place 229 432 Wellington Street West Wellington Place

205 List of Non-Contributing Properties

# Primary Address Character Sub-Area 230 456 Wellington Street West Wellington Place 231 474 Wellington Street West Wellington Place 232 485 Wellington Street West Wellington Place 233 489 Wellington Street West Wellington Place 234 500 Wellington Street West Wellington Place 235 504 Wellington Street West Wellington Place 236 508 Wellington Street West Wellington Place Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan 237 535 Wellington Street West Wellington Place 238 8 Widmer Street 239 11 Widmer Street 240 21 Widmer Street 241 30 Widmer Street 242 40 Widmer Street 243 42 Widmer Street 244 44 Widmer Street 245 46 Widmer Street 246 48 Widmer Street 247 50 Widmer Street 248 52 Widmer Street 249 54 Widmer Street 250 56 Widmer Street 251 58 Widmer Street

Total 251 City Of Toronto June 2017 206 Appendices | King-Spadina HCD Plan

207