DOCSLIB.ORG

Stacy and Witbeck

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Light Rail SWI has constructed many of the signature light rail projects in the United States, including projects in Portland, Seattle, Salt Lake City, San Diego, Denver, Dallas, and Houston. Working in dense urban environments is our stock in trade, and we have received countless awards and letters of commendation for our efforts to Annual incentive bonuses Superior Medical, Dental, ease the impacts of construction within and wage increases Vision, and Life Insurance the communities in which we build. Our experience includes building light rail projects around active transit and freight operations and performing critical tie-ins without any unscheduled disruption to revenue service. Gilbert Road Light Rail Extension Phoenix, AZ Retirement Savings Plan (401K) $113 million – we contribute up to 10% of Profit Sharing (ESOP) – we East Link Extension - Downtown your annual salary in addition contribute up to 15% of your Bellevue to Spring District to your salary deferral annual salary Seattle, WA $228 million Mid Coast Corridor Projects San Diego, CA Career Opportunities $1.2 billion SWI looks for individuals who have a passion for building and are eager to work in a Northgate Link Extension - Trackwork collaborative environment on landmark projects. We work across the country in many Seattle, WA major metropolitan areas. A strength of our company is our size – we’re large enough $72 million to offer employees challenging opportunities on major projects, but small enough to Northwest Phase I Light Rail personally recognize and acknowledge individuals and their contributions. We pride Extension Orange Line Expansion to Irving ourselves in our value and culture as a family-oriented employee owned company. Phoenix, AZ (I-1/I-2 and I-3) $163 million Dallas, TX SWI is interested in talented candidates with backgrounds and experience related Stacy and Witbeck $584 million to construction management or engineering, as well as safety, quality control, and University Link Light Rail Transit contract management. For more than 35 years, Stacy and Witbeck (SWI) has gained a reputation for Track and Systems I-205 Light Rail Extension being an ethical and trustworthy partner on complex transit and transportation Seattle, WA Portland, OR Please visit our website for more information or get in touch with us by emailing projects. We are one of the country’s largest heavy civil contractors and a top $126 million $181 million [email protected] builder of light rail, commuter rail, and streetcar systems across the United States. Portland Transit Mall Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail Transit We are recognized throughout the construction industry for our ability to manage Portland, OR Projects –(East and West Segments) the challenges of complex projects while creating and maintaining cooperative $158 million Portland, OR Stacy and Witbeck relationships with owners, stakeholders, subcontractors, and the communities in $389 million Line Sections 4 and 5 Light Rail 2800 Harbor Bay Parkway which we work. Houston METRO Light Rail Expansion Extension Houston, TX Phoenix, AZ Alameda, CA 94502 Our team specializes in the construction of all things related to rail transportation. $1.23 billion $147,542,468 T 510.748.1870 F 510.748.1205 Our expertise includes utility work, earthwork, structures, bridge construction, and electrical systems work. Whether you measure our capabilities by miles Interstate MAX Line Sections 10a/10b Airport/West Valley TRAX Light Rail of track installed or the number of projects completed, we have constructed Portland, OR Extension more streetcar, more light rail, and more commuter rail projects than any other $104 million Salt Lake City, UT contractor in the United States. Our resume includes many signature transit $341 million University/Medical Center www.stacywitbeck.com and transportation projects, including major projects in San Francisco, San Jose, West Rail Line Light Rail Extension An Employee Owned Company Sacramento, Los Angeles, Portland, Seattle, Salt Lake City, Phoenix, Denver, Dallas, Denver, CO Salt Lake City, UT Houston, Kansas City, and Detroit. $369 million $125 million Streetcar Commuter Rail Maintenance Facilities SWI is a leader in streetcar SWI has constructed commuter SWI provides full service construction construction. Starting with one of the rail lines in California, Washington, capabilities for transit owners, oldest forms of streetcars, our firm Oregon, and Utah, most of which including state-of-the-art maintenance constructed the San Francisco Cable are built within active freight rail and operation facility construction, Car along California Street during the corridors. We have developed excellent yard trackwork, building construction, early 1980s. Our streetcar projects relationships with Class 1, short line, equipment installation, and facility also include the first modern streetcar and regional railroads to successfully modifications. From existing project constructed in the United complete our projects, and we have facility expansion to the ground-up States – the Portland Streetcar Phase never disrupted freight operations as construction of new maintenance 1 project in Portland, Oregon. Since a result of our efforts. Commuter rail facilities, we excel at this work by then, we have built every streetcar construction typically spans several managing hundreds of specialty line in Portland. These projects have city, county, and utility jurisdictions, subcontractors and by coordinating become the model for most of the and requires significant and existing transit operations to deliver modern streetcar projects being complex coordination with multiple these projects safely, on time, and planned and built in the United States. stakeholders. Our project teams without disruption to operations. No other firm has received the amount have been very successful developing East Contra Costa BART of awards, letters of recognition, solutions to the challenges of this Maintenance Facility and real-life experiences building work. Antioch, CA successful streetcar systems. Point Defiance Bypass Track and $11 million Tempe Streetcar Signal Improvements Kansas City Streetcar Maintenance Tempe, AZ Tacoma, WA Facility $80 million $54 million Kansas City, MO $10 million Oklahoma City Streetcar North Coast Corridor Oklahoma City, OK North San Diego County, CA Houston METRO Light Rail Storage, $50 million $650 million Operations, and Service Facilities QLINE Detroit Streetcar Houston, TX East Contra Costa BART Extension $50 million Detroit, MI Pittsburg to Antioch, CA $137 million $87 million First Hill Streetcar Maintenance Facility Kansas City Streetcar SMART Commuter Rail Kansas City, MO Seattle, WA Sonoma and Marin Counties, CA $88 million $8 million $206 million Dallas Streetcar Muni Metro East Light Rail Dallas, TX FrontRunner North and South Maintenance and Operations $29 million Commuter Rail Facility Salt Lake City, UT San Francisco, CA Sugar House Streetcar $803 million $141 million Salt Lake City, UT $40 million Westside Express Service (WES) Valley Metro Operations and Portland, OR Maintenance Facility First Hill Streetcar $62 million Phoenix, AZ Seattle, WA $65 million South Lake Union Streetcar $72 million North and South CTX Commuter Maintenance Facility Rail Ruby Junction Maintenance Facility Seattle, WA SW Moody Avenue Roadway and San Francisco, CA and Expansion $4 million Track Relocation Gresham, OR Portland, OR $124 million Mid Embarcadero Historic $31 million Division 11 Maintenance Facility $32 million Streetcar Expansion San Francisco, CA Jordan River Service Center Los Angeles, CA Portland Streetcar Loop Salt Lake City, UT Portland, OR $50 million $14 million $15 million $109 million Fisherman’s Wharf F-Line Historic Light Rail Vehicle Facility Portland Streetcar Maintenance Portland Streetcar Phase 1 - 4 Streetcar Expansion Portland, OR San Francisco, CA Facility and Expansion Santa Clara, CA Portland, OR $61 million $16 million $4 million $8 million.
Recommended publications
  • Dover Nj to Penn Station Train Schedule

    Dover Nj to Penn Station Train Schedule

    Dover Nj To Penn Station Train Schedule Courtney tickles goofily as diminuendo Farley snatch her Elohim sparkles irreparably. Spousal Odell thigging scantly, he Americanizing his pinhole very unashamedly. Sometimes bothered Ignazio depersonalized her saplessness testily, but earthier Worth rebraced sparely or amplifies troublesomely. Ledger, find Bergen County real estate listings and senior about local pond on NJ. Only new users can earn points through a referral. Good reason why share write a roundtrip train companies sell or penn station? Buses are choreographed to penn station is designed to do? CEO of Wanderu, as notice as later office instigator of celebratory vodka shots. Customers are strongly encouraged to sign up know My Transit alerts and activate push notifications on the mobile app to rumor the latest status of value system, NJ Transit said allow a release. Traveling by nj transit schedule except with fantastic fly ticket. This improve my hire time using Wanderu, pleasantly surprised! New jersey motorcycle helmet law enforcement of nj transit numbers used to dover can go around your trips. Five NJ TRANSIT rail lines serve Penn Station New York. In image to judge you with key best quality of ticket system map online, we will provided detailed Maps by Community in addition consider the splash System Map. Restaurants in an essential role in essex and this station to dover nj penn station due to get access is no parking at no. The NJ Transit will take occasion to Manhattan to Penn Station. Get schedules schedule information is dover, check travel by following one scheduled train tour of penn station in completing your commute or www.
  • 2017 Certification Review Report

    2017 Certification Review Report

    Transportation Management Area Planning Certification Review Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration St. Louis Transportation Management Area April 14, 2017 Summary Report Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Disposition of FY 2013 Certification Review Corrective Action and Recommendations..5 1.2 Summary of FY 2017 Findings .......................................................................................... 5 2.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Purpose and Objective ................................................................................................... 11 3.0 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................. 12 3.1 Review Process ............................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Documents Reviewed ..................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Input from the Public, Officials, and Member Agencies Staffs ......................................... 13 4.0 PROGRAM REVIEW ...........................................................................................................
  • Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? the Qline and the People Mover”

    Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? the Qline and the People Mover”

    “Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? The QLine and the People Mover” John B. Sutcliffe, Sarah Cipkar and Geoffrey Alchin Department of Political Science, University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4 Email: [email protected] Paper prepared for presentation at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC. June 2019. This is a working draft. Please do not cite without permission. 1 “Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? The QLine and the People Mover" Introduction On May 12, 2017 a new streetcar – the QLine – began operating in Detroit, running along a 3.3- mile (6.6-mile return) route on Woodward Avenue, one of the central north-south roads in the city. This project is one example of the return to prominence of streetcars in the (re)development of American cities. Having fallen into disuse and abandonment in hundreds of American cities during the early part of the 20th century, this form of public transit has returned in many cities including, for example, Dallas, Cincinnati, Kansas City, and Portland. As streetcar services have returned to prominence, so too has the debate about their utility as a form of public transit, the function they serve in a city, and who they serve (Brown 2013; Culver 2017). These debates are evident in the case of Detroit. Proponents of the QLine – most prominently the individuals and organizations that advocated for its creation and provided the majority of the start-up capital – have praised the streetcar for acting as a spur to development, for being a forward-thinking transit system and for acting as a first step towards a comprehensive regional transit system in Metro Detroit (see M-1 Rail 2018).
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study

    Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study

    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
  • Light Rail Transit (LRT)

    Light Rail Transit (LRT)

    Transit Strategies Light Rail Transit (LRT) Light rail transit (LRT) is electrified rail service that operates in urban environments in completely exclusive rights‐of‐way, in exclusive lanes on roadways, and in some cases in mixed traffic. Most often, it uses one to three car trains and serves high volume corridors at higher speeds than local bus and streetcar service. Design and operational elements of LRT include level boarding, off‐board fare payment, and traffic signal priority. Stations are typically spaced farther apart than those of local transit services and are usually situated where there are higher population and employment densities. MAX Light Rail (Portland, OR) The T Light Rail (Pittsburgh, PA) Characteristics of LRT Service LRT is popular with passengers for a number of reasons, the most important of which are that service is fast, frequent, direct, and operates from early morning to late night. These attributes make service more convenient—much more convenient than regular bus service—and more competitive with travel by automobile. Characteristics of LRT service include: . Frequent service, typically every 10 minutes or better . Long spans of service, often 18 hours a day or more . Direct service along major corridors . Fast service Keys reasons that service is fast are the use of exclusive rights‐of‐way—exclusive lanes in the medians of roadways, in former rail rights‐of‐way, and in subways—and that stations are spaced further apart than with bus service, typically every half mile (although stations are often spaced more closely within downtown areas). Rhode Island Transit Master Plan | 1 Differences between LRT and Streetcar Light rail and streetcar service are often confused, largely because they share many similarities.
  • City Response to DART Downtown Transit Study

    City Response to DART Downtown Transit Study

    Oak Cliff Gateway Community Meeting TIGER Streetcar Project Update Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects TIGER Streetcar Project Initial Dallas streetcar planning efforts grew out of CBD Comprehensive Transportation Plan and D2 light rail analysis Focused within downtown loop NCTCOG received a grant on behalf of the City of Dallas from the Federal Transit Administration for the streetcar starter line to serve the CBD and North Oak Cliff workforce The 1.6 mile base project runs from Union Station to Methodist Hospital at a cost of approximately $48.6M including vehicles $26M in federal funding $12.8M in local funding (Regional Toll-road Revenue) $9M from DART for vehicles 2 TIGER Streetcar Project 3 TIGER Streetcar Project Stacey and Witbeck/Carcon were given notice to proceed with final design and construction in September 2012 and bridge demolition is currently underway Base project has been enhanced to provide double track operation along Zang and Colorado Completion of base project is scheduled for October 2014 Brookville Equipment Corporation was given notice to proceed with production of two vehicles in March 2013 First American made off-wire modern streetcar vehicle The Dallas streetcar will be 8’ wide, 66.5’ long with capacity to carry 41 passenger seated and maximum 170 standees Anticipated vehicle delivery is late summer 2014 4 TIGER Streetcar Project Extension The Regional Transportation Council (RTC) recently reprogrammed $30.87M in Texas Mobility Funds to the Dallas Streetcar Project The funds are proposed to extend the base project an additional 1.25 miles and provide two additional vehicles .75 miles south from Methodist Hospital to the Bishop Arts District ($15M) .5 miles north to the Dallas Convention Center/Omni Hotel ($7.87M) Streetcar Vehicles ($8M) 5 TIGER Streetcar Project Extension 6 TIGER Streetcar Project Extension Operation and Maintenance Cost Operation for base Streetcar Project funded by Dallas Area Rapid Transit Base project assumes weekday service only 5:00 a.m.
  • Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical

    Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical

    METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL
  • 2018 Streetcar Summit Westin New Orleans – Canal Place All Sessions in the Grand Ballroom

    2018 Streetcar Summit Westin New Orleans – Canal Place All Sessions in the Grand Ballroom

    2018 Streetcar Summit Westin New Orleans – Canal Place All Sessions in the Grand Ballroom Sunday, April 15, 2018 4:00 – 5:00 pm The Next Generation: Conversations between students from local universities and experts in the field 5:00 – 7:00 pm Reception at the Hotel Monday, April 16, 2018 8:00 – 9:00 am Registration, Check in and Breakfast 9:00 – 10:00 am Welcome and brief updates on projects DJ Baxter, SOJ, Chair Community Streetcar Coalition Board 10:00 – 10:30 am Legislative Update Jeff Boothe, Executive Director, Community Streetcar Coalition 10:30 – 10:45 am Break 10:45 – 12:00 pm Evolving Technology – Off-Wire Vehicles and Autonomous Streetcars Moderator: Barbara Schroeder, Alstom Transport Curtis Ailes, City of Seattle Jim Barbaresso, HNTB Mark Dorn, AECOM 12:00 – 1:30 pm Lunch 1:30 – 3:00 pm Evolving Role of Streetcars in Urban Transit Systems Moderator: Ethan Melone, Parsons Robin Aredondo-Savage, Vice Mayor, City of Tempe, AZ Jeff Boothe, Boothe Transit Consulting Tom Gerend, Kansas City Streetcar Authority Keith Jones, RATP Dev America, Washington DC Streetcar Luis Mota, Valley Metro 3:00 – 4:15 pm Planning for the next 10-100 years: Stories from the Veterans Moderator: Jeff Boothe, Community Streetcar Coalition Dan Bower, Executive Director, Portland Streetcar, Inc. Chris Eilerman, City of Seattle Adelee Le Grand, Transdev, New Orleans 4:15 – 4:45 pm Statistics Tracked – what do we choose and why? DJ Baxter, SOJ, Chair Community Streetcar Coalition Board 4:45 – 5:15 pm Opening 2018! – Special look at the new systems opening
  • Fy 2018 Business Plan

    Fy 2018 Business Plan

    Dallas Area Rapid Transit FY 2018 BUSINESS PLAN Including FY 2018 Annual Budget and Twenty-Year Financial Plan FY 2018 Business Plan L4.indd 1 7/31/17 9:40 AM DART BOARD MEMBERS Sue Bauman Dallas Catherine Cuellar Dallas and Cockrell Hill Mark C. Enoch Garland, Rowlett and Glenn Heights Tim A. Hayden Carrollton and Irving Ray Jackson Dallas Jonathan R. Kelly Garland Patrick Kennedy Dallas Jon-Bertrell Killen Dallas Michele Wong Krause Dallas Amanda Moreno Dallas Gary Slagel Richardson, University Park, Addison and Highland Park Rick Stopfer Irving Dominique Torres Dallas Paul N. Wageman Plano Faye Moses Wilkins Plano and Farmers Branch FY 2018 Business Plan L4.indd 2 7/31/17 9:40 AM FY 2018 Business Plan (09/26/17) How to Use This Book What’s in this Book This book contains the Business Plan for Fiscal Year 2018 (FY 2018 – which ends September 30, 2018) for Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART or the Agency). The Business Plan provides the DART Board of Directors, customers, taxpayers, elected officials, and other stakeholder groups of our region with a comprehensive summary of the Agency's plans and commitments to improve regional mobility, enhance the quality of life, and stimulate economic development. This document consolidates the key elements of the FY 2018 Annual Budget, the FY 2018 Twenty-Year Financial Plan, the Transit System Plan, and the Agency's Strategic Plan. A summary of the information contained in the various sections follows. The formal Letter of Transmittal summarizes priorities and issues for the upcoming year. The section titled Who We Are should help those not familiar with DART to understand the basis from which the Agency operates.
  • Grand Central Building Anchor Full Block Between Se 8Th & 9Th / Se Morrison & Belmont 808 Se Morrison Street | Portland | Oregon | 97214

    Grand Central Building Anchor Full Block Between Se 8Th & 9Th / Se Morrison & Belmont 808 Se Morrison Street | Portland | Oregon | 97214

    GRAND CENTRAL BUILDING ANCHOR FULL BLOCK BETWEEN SE 8TH & 9TH / SE MORRISON & BELMONT 808 SE MORRISON STREET | PORTLAND | OREGON | 97214 APPROXIMATELY 20,617 SQUARE FOOT ANCHOR SPACE WITH OFF-STREET PARKING AVAILABLE ANCHOR SIGNAGE OPPORTUNITY PRIME LOCATION IN THE CENTRAL EASTSIDE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ANCHOR SIGNAGE OPPORTUNITY SE MORRISON STREET Looking East From SE 7th & Morrison CENTRAL EASTSIDE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT | SE 8TH & MORRISON / SE 9TH & BELMONT THE GRAND CENTRAL BUILDING Building Overview | A Contributing Historic Property to Portland’s Fruitpacking District The Grand Central Building is a Spanish Colonial Revival building originally constructed in 1929 as a public market in Portland’s fruitpacking district and featured 23 separate vendors. Available Space | Anchor Space Total: Approximately 20,617 Square Feet First Floor: 15,617 Square Feet Mezzanine: 5,000 Square Feet Parking | The Grand Central Building features an underground parking garage with 76 parking spaces as well as a surface lot on the west side of the building with 28 additional parking spaces. Building Co-Tenants | West Face of Building Area Retailers | Building Location | Located between SE Morrison & Belmont Streets, SE 8th & 9th Avenues The Central Eastside Industrial District (CEID), the area bound by Interstate 84 to the North, the Willamette River to the west, Powell Blvd / Hwy 26 to the south, and NE/SE 12th Avenue to the east, was once the fruitpacking center of Portland. Located immediately east across the Burnside, Morrison, and Hawthorne Bridges from Downtown Portland, the CEID provides a convenient - and often more spacious - alternative to the CBD for office users and retailers looking to locate in the Central City.
  • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit

    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit

    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) Performance Characteristics Stations Mixed Traffic Lanes* Service Characteristics Newest Corridor End‐to‐End Travel Departures Every 'X' Travel Speed (MPH) City Corridor Segment Open length (mi) # Spacing (mi) Miles % Time Minutes BRT Systems Boston Silver Line Washington Street ‐ SL5 2002 2.40 13 0.18 1.03 42.93% 19 7 7.58 Oakland San Pablo Rapid ‐ 72R 2003 14.79 52 0.28 14.79 100.00% 60 12 14.79 Albuquerque The Red Line (766) 2004 11.00 17 0.65 10.32 93.79% 44 18 15.00 Kansas City Main Street ‐ MAX "Orange Line" 2005 8.95 22 0.41 4.29 47.92% 40 10 13.42 Eugene Green Line 2007 3.98 10 0.40 1.59 40.00% 29 10 8.23 New York Bx12 SBS (Fordham Road ‐ Pelham Pkwy) 2008 9.00 18 0.50 5.20 57.73% 52 3 10.38 Cleveland HealthLine 2008 6.80 39 0.17 2.33 34.19% 38 8 10.74 Snohomish County Swift BRT ‐ Blue Line 2009 16.72 31 0.54 6.77 40.52% 43 12 23.33 Eugene Gateway Line 2011 7.76 14 0.55 2.59 33.33% 29 10 16.05 Kansas City Troost Avenue ‐ "Green Line" 2011 12.93 22 0.59 12.93 100.00% 50 10 15.51 New York M34 SBS (34th Street) 2011 2.00 13 0.15 2.00 100.00% 23 9 5.22 Stockton Route #44 ‐ Airport Corridor 2011 5.50 8 0.69 5.50 100.00% 23 20 14.35 Stockton Route #43 ‐ Hammer Corridor 2012 5.30 14 0.38 5.30 100.00% 28 12 11.35 Alexandria ‐ Arlington Metroway 2014 6.80 15 0.45 6.12 89.95% 24 12 17.00 Fort Collins Mason Corridor 2014 4.97 12 0.41 1.99 40.00% 24 10 12.43 San Bernardino sbX ‐ "Green Line" 2014 15.70 16 0.98 9.86 62.79% 56 10 16.82 Minneapolis A Line 2016 9.90 20 0.50 9.90 100.00% 28 10 21.21 Minneapolis Red Line 2013 13.00 5 2.60 2.00 15.38% 55 15 14.18 Chapel Hill N‐S Corridor Proposed 8.20 16 0.51 1.34 16.34% 30 7.5 16.40 LRT Systems St.
  • Living in Dallas, Texas Demographics Dallas Is the Third-Largest City in Texas and the Ninth-Largest in the United States

    Living in Dallas, Texas Demographics Dallas Is the Third-Largest City in Texas and the Ninth-Largest in the United States

    Living in Dallas, Texas Demographics Dallas is the third-largest city in Texas and the ninth-largest in the United States. Dallas forms the heart of the large metropolitan area in north central Texas, commonly referred to as the “metroplex”. The metroplex, a 12-county area encompassing more than 120 cities, is anchored by the City of Dallas in the east and the City of Fort Worth in the west. The population of Dallas is around 1.3 million according to the US Census Bureau. This ultra- modern and sophisticated city is the largest economic center of the 12-county Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area, which is the fourth-largest metropolitan area in the United States. The Dallas community is world-class with a diverse population located on a total land area of 384 square miles. Dallas is centrally located within the US and serves as a commercial and cultural hub of the Southwest region. Within a four-hour flight from most North American destinations, the travel possibilities are endless. Dallas is also a leading business and meeting city. Dallas-Fort Worth is home to 24 Fortune 500 companies and has become a hotspot in recent years for corporate relocations. Notable Fortune 500 companies include: Exxon Mobil, AT&T, Energy Transfer Equity, American Airlines Group, Southwest Airlines, Texas Instruments, GameStop, D.R. Horton, and Dr. Pepper Snapple Group. Entertainment/Culture With many entertainment districts within a short distance of downtown, Dallas is a unique melting pot which mixes local history with arts, culture, dining, and more. Dallas is stylish and cosmopolitan, a city with a well-earned reputation for fashion, shopping, and prosperity.