DOCSLIB.ORG

Our Broken Voting System and How to Repair It

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Our Broken Voting System and How to Repair It THE 2012 ELECTION PROTECTION REPORT OUR BROKEN VOTING SYSTEM AND HOW TO REPAIR IT FULL REPORT PRESENTED BY ELECTION PROTECTION Led by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law 1401 New York Ave, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005 Phone: (202) 662-8600 Toll Free: (888) 299-5227 Fax: (202) 783-0857 www.866OurVote.org /866OurVote @866OurVote www.lawyerscommittee.org /lawyerscommittee @lawyerscomm © 2013 by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. This report may be reproduced in its entirety as long as Election Protection is credited, a link to the Coalition’s web page is provided, and no charge is imposed. The report may not be reproduced in part or in altered form, or if a fee is charged, without the Lawyers’ Committee’s permission. NOTE: This report reflects the views of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and does not necessarily reflect the views of any other Election Protection partner or supporter. About ELECTION PROTECTION The nonpartisan Election Protection coalition—led by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law—was formed to ensure that all voters have an equal opportunity to participate in the political process. Made up of more than 100 local, state and national partners, this year’s coalition was the largest voter protection and education effort in the nation’s history. Through our state of the art hotlines (1-866-OUR-VOTE, administered by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and 1-888-Ve-Y-Vota, administered by the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Educational Fund); interactive website (www.866OurVote.org); and voter protection field programs across the country, we provide Americans from coast to coast with comprehensive voter information and advice on how they can make sure their vote is counted. OUR BROKEN VOTING SYSTEM AND HOW TO REPAIR IT i THANK YOUS Thank You Coalition Partners Election Protection and the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law would like to thank the national, state and local partners who led the program in their communities. The success of the program is owed to their experience, relationships and leadership. ADVANCEMENT PROJECT CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE AFL-CIO CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS CITIZENS ENGAGEMENT LAB AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE COLOR OF CHANGE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMITTEE OF SEVENTY PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES COMMON CAUSE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF DEMOS UNIVERSITY WOMEN FAIR ELECTIONS LEGAL NETWORK AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION FAIRVOTE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION HIP HOP CAUCUS AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY HISPANIC NATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN APIA VOTE IMPACT ASIAN AMERICAN JUSTICE CENTER LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL ASIAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EDUCATION FUND AND EDUCATION FUND LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AMERICAN CITIZEN BUS FEDERATION CIVIC FUND LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER VOTING LONG DISTANCE VOTER RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT PROJECT MOMS RISING CAMPUS COMPACT NAACP CAMPUS PROGRESS ii THE 2012 ELECTION PROTECTION REPORT NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & LATINO JUSTICE - PRLDEF EDUCATIONAL FUND PROGRESSNOW NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC PROJECT VOTE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION ROCK THE VOTE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LATINO ELECTED AND APPOINTED SERVICE EMPLOYEES OFFICIALS EDUCATIONAL FUND INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION SIERRA CLUB NATIONAL BLACK LAW SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION STUDENTS ASSOCIATION AND EDUCATION PROJECT NATIONAL COALITION FOR STATE VOICES BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER NATIONAL COALITION THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS TURBO VOTE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN UNITED STATES STUDENT NATIONAL CONGRESS OF ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION AMERICAN INDIANS UNITED STEELWORKERS NATIONAL DISABILITY RIGHTS NETWORK UNC CENTER FOR CIVIL RIGHTS NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION U.S. PIRG NATIVE VOTE US VOTE FOUNDATION NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA VERIFIED VOTING FOUNDATION NEW ORGANIZING INSTITUTE VOTE RIDERS NON-PROFIT VOTE VOTO LATINO OVERSEAS VOTE FOUNDATION WOMEN DONORS NETWORK PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION Thank You Legal Volunteers A tremendous thank you to the following law firms, corporate legal departments, and law schools for their support of Election Protection 2012: AARP ATLANTA’S JOHN MARSHALL AOL, INC. LAW SCHOOL AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP ALSTON & BIRD LLP BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLP AMERICAN UNIVERSITY WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW BENJAMIN N. CARDOZO SCHOOL OF LAW ARENT FOX LLP BEST BUY CO., INC. ARNOLD & PORTER LLP BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP BLANK ROME LLP OUR BROKEN VOTING SYSTEM AND HOW TO REPAIR IT iii BNY MELLON ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN BOSTON COLLEGE LAW SCHOOL & MELLOTT, LLC BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BRACEWELL & GIULIANI LLP E-TRADE BRYAN CAVE LLP EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION BUCHALTER NEMER FEDEX GROUND CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM FENWICK & WEST LLP & TAFT LLP FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. CAMPBELL LAW SCHOOL FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY CARLTON FIELDS, P.A. COLLEGE OF LAW CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY AMERICA LAW SCHOOL COLLEGE OF LAW CBS CORPORATION FOLEY HOAG LLP CHADBOURNE & PARKE LLP FOLEY & LARDNER LLP CHOATE HALL & STEWART LLP FORDHAM LAW SCHOOL CITIGROUP FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER & JACOBSON LLP CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP FRIEDMAN & WOLFE CLEVELAND-MARSHALL FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. COLLEGE OF LAW GEORGE WASHINGTON COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY, COLLEGE OF LAW COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP GIBNEY ANTHONY & FLAHERTY LLP COVENTRY HEALTH CARE, INC. GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP GOODWIN PROCTER LLP CROWELL & MORING LLP GOOGLE DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL GOULSTON & STORRS DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP HAMLINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP HARVARD LAW SCHOOL DECHERT LLP HOGAN LOVELLS LLP DELOITTE FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP DEPAUL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW HOWARD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP DLA PIPER US LLP HUNTON & WILLIAMS DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP HYATT HOTELS CORPORATION DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP INMOTION ENTERTAINMENT DUANE MORRIS LLP ITT CORPORATION JAFFE RAITT HEUER & WEISS, P.C. iv THE 2012 ELECTION PROTECTION REPORT JOHN MARSHALL LAW SCHOOL PAUL HASTINGS JANOFSY & WALKER LLP JOSEPH, GREENWALD & LAAKE, P.A. PAUL WEISS RIFKIND WHARTON JPMORGAN CHASE & GARRISON LLP KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP PEPPER HAMILTON LLP KAYE SCHOLER LLP PFIZER INC. KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP PROSKAUER ROSE LLP KING & SPALDING QUALCOMM INC. KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP QUARLES & BRADY LLP K&L GATES LLP REED SMITH LLP LABATON SUCHAROW LLP ROPES & GRAY LLP LATHAM & WATKINS LLP RUTGERS SCHOOL OF LAW-NEWARK LOWENSTEIN SANDLER PC SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP SCHOOL OF LAW MAYOR BROWN LLP SCHNADER HARRISON MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP SEGAL & LEWIS LLP MERRILL LYNCH CORPORATION SEDGWICK LLP METCALF KASPARI ENGDAHL & LAZARUS SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY SEYFORTH SHAW LLP MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP NBC UNIVERSAL, INC. SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP SNR DENTON NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL STANFORD SCHOOL OF LAW NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP NIXON PEABODY LLP STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP CHASE COLLEGE OF LAW SUTHERLAND LLP OGLEETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, THOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOL OF LAW SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. THOMAS M. COOLEY LAW SCHOOL OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY MONTZ COLLEGE OF LAW TIME WARNER INC. O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP TMZ PRODUCTIONS ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP PATTERSON BELKNAP TULANE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL WEBB & TYLER LLP UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW PATTON BOGGS LLP UNITED HEALTH GROUP OUR BROKEN VOTING SYSTEM AND HOW TO REPAIR IT v UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF LAW GOULD SCHOOL OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO- SCHOOL OF LAW COLLEGE OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL BERKELEY SCHOOL OF LAW VIACOM INC. UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY OF COLUMBIA, DAVID A. SCHOOL OF LAW CLARKE SCHOOL OF LAW WARNER BROTHERS, UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA ENTERTAINMENT INC. SCHOOL OF LAW WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER WILLIAM & MARY SCHOOL OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW WILLIAM MITCHELL COLLEGE OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF LAW WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LAW SCHOOL WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL WINSTON & STRAWN LLP UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER LLP CENTER FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND SCHOOL OF LAW vi THE 2012 ELECTION PROTECTION REPORT CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Background on Election Protection 8 2012 Election: Overcoming Barriers to the Ballot 10 Litigation Before Election Day 15 The Endemic Problems that Continue to Plague Our Electoral Process 23 A Way Forward: Policy Recommendations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Confronting Modern Barriers to Voting Rights in America 1
    DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Confronting Modern Barriers to Voting Rights in America 1 DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Confronting Modern Barriers to Voting Rights in America A Report by the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. and the NAACP 2 DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Confronting Modern Barriers to Voting Rights in America NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) National Headquarters 99 Hudson Street, Suite 1600 New York, New York 10013 212.965.2200 www.naacpldf.org The NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund (LDF) is America’s premier legal organization fighting for racial justice. Through litigation, advocacy, and public education, LDF seeks structural changes to expand democracy, eliminate racial disparities, and achieve racial justice, to create a society that fulfills the promise of equality for all Americans. LDF also defends the gains and protections won over the past 70 years of civil rights struggle and works to improve the quality and diversity of judicial and executive appointments. NAACP National Headquarters 4805 Mt. Hope Drive Baltimore, Maryland 21215 410.580.5777 www.naacp.org Founded in 1909, the NAACP is the nation’s oldest and largest civil rights organization. Our mission is to ensure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of rights of all persons and to eliminate racial discrimination. For over one hundred years, the NAACP has remained a visionary grassroots and national organization dedicated to ensuring freedom and social justice for all Americans. Today, with over 1,200 active NAACP branches across the nation, over 300 youth and college groups, and over 250,000 members, the NAACP remains one of the largest and most vibrant civil rights organizations in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Robert Duncan
    August 24, 2020 Robert M. Duncan Chairman USPS Board of Governors 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW Washington, DC 20260 Mr. Duncan, With an expected onslaught of requests by Americans for mail-in ballots leading up to the 2020 election and repeated attacks by President Trump on the efficacy of voting by mail, it is essential now more than ever that those at the helm of the United States Postal Service (USPS) have the best interests of the American people, and the postal service as an institution, driving their actions. Due to your extensive past involvement in voter disenfranchisement efforts, we call on you to resign from the USPS Board of Governors. Your history raises significant concerns about your commitment to ensuring free, fair, and accessible voting. During your tenure as general counsel of the Republican National Committee and as a member of the Kentucky Republican Party’s executive committee, numerous state parties — including Kentucky’s — were accused of coordinated voter suppression efforts via the banned practice of voter caging1 in an attempt to sway the 2004 election.2 Despite the Republican National Committee being forbidden from conducting voter caging by a court-ordered consent decree in 1982,3 accusations surrounding Kentucky’s 2004 election suggest that you may have overseen this type of voter suppression — primarily in majority- minority metropolitan areas.4 Your role in the potential voter suppression tactic deployed by Kentucky’s Republican Party is particularly suspect given your positions in both the state party and the Republican National Committee, as internal emails suggest the groups were in close coordination to carry out these efforts.5 Your history in Kentucky alone should be reason for grave concern about your ability to protect Americans’ access to voting.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 March 18, 2021 To
    March 18, 2021 To: Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen Secretary of State Anthony Blinken Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm Incoming President and Chairperson of the U.S. Export-Import Bank Acting CEO of the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation Dev Jagadesan Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Jake Sullivan Special Assistant to the President for Economic Policy Robin Colwell [heads of other agencies and partner institutions, as appropriate] We are encouraged by the Biden Administration’s initial steps to implement a ‘whole-of-government’ approach to the climate crisis, as set out in the January 27 “Executive Order on Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad.” We are writing now to provide our recommendations on a critical piece of the international agenda described in the Executive Order — ending public support for fossil fuels around the world by “promoting the flow of capital toward climate-aligned investments and away from high-carbon investments.” We urge the Biden Administration to act swiftly to end new financing for all parts of the fossil fuel supply chain (including for gas), stop new U.S. fossil fuel support within 90 days across all government institutions, and work with other nations to end fossil fuel financing.1 As you know, averting the worst impacts of the climate crisis requires a rapid transition away from fossil fuels. There is simply no room left for new investments in long-lived carbon intensive infrastructure. Still, public agencies continue to provide tens of billions of dollars to finance and support such investments each year. This has to stop.
    [Show full text]
  • “NAACP”) and the Ohio State Conference of the NAACP (“OH NAACP”) Respectfully Submit This Amici Curiae Brief in Support of Respondents in This Matter.1
    No. 16-980 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States JON HUSTED, OHIO SECRetARY OF STAte, Petitioner, v. A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, et al., Respondents. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CouRT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRcuIT BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE AND THE OHIO STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS MARTIN L. SAAD GILDA R. DANIELS KATHLEEN K. SHEriDAN Counsel of Record JOHN C. VAZQUEZ JUDITH BROWNE DIANIS CHriSTOPHER N. MORAN DONITA JUDGE VENABLE LLP EILEEN MA 600 Massachusetts Avenue, NW ANDREW HAirSTON Washington, DC 20001 ADVANCEMENT PROJECT (202) 344-4000 1220 L Street, NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 728-9557 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae (Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page) September 22, 2017 275734 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS..........................i TABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES ..............iv IDENTITY AND INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE .....................................1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................2 ARGUMENT....................................6 I. OHIO’S SUPPRESSIVE VOTER TACTICS DENY THE RIGHT TO VOTE ....................................6 A. History of Voter Suppression in Ohio......6 1. Voter Challenges ...................7 2. Long Lines and Poll Worker Error ....7 3. Golden Week .......................8 4. Provisional Ballots .................10 5. Other Election Administration Errors ...........................11 ii Table of Contents Page B. Ohio’s History of Suppressive Voting Measures Has Led to Decreased Voter Engagement and Inactive Voters ........12 1. A Decline in Black Voter Participation in Ohio in 2016 Reflects the Impact of Voter Suppression.......................13 2. Disenfranchisement Results in Low Voter Participation Rates in Communities of Color ..............14 II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth About Voter Fraud 7 Clerical Or Typographical Errors 7 Bad “Matching” 8 Jumping to Conclusions 9 Voter Mistakes 11 VI
    Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a non-partisan public policy and law institute that focuses on fundamental issues of democracy and justice. Our work ranges from voting rights to redistricting reform, from access to the courts to presidential power in the fight against terrorism. A sin- gular institution—part think tank, part public interest law firm, part advocacy group—the Brennan Center combines scholarship, legislative and legal advocacy, and communications to win meaningful, measurable change in the public sector. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S VOTING RIGHTS AND ELECTIONS PROJECT The Voting Rights and Elections Project works to expand the franchise, to make it as simple as possible for every eligible American to vote, and to ensure that every vote cast is accurately recorded and counted. The Center’s staff provides top-flight legal and policy assistance on a broad range of election administration issues, including voter registration systems, voting technology, voter identification, statewide voter registration list maintenance, and provisional ballots. © 2007. This paper is covered by the Creative Commons “Attribution-No Derivs-NonCommercial” license (see http://creativecommons.org). It may be reproduced in its entirety as long as the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is credited, a link to the Center’s web page is provided, and no charge is imposed. The paper may not be reproduced in part or in altered form, or if a fee is charged, without the Center’s permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Purges
    ANALYSIS Voter Purges: the Risks in 2018 by Jonathan Brater† Introduction state sent county clerks the names of more than 50,000 people who were supposedly ineligible Voter purges — the often controversial practice to vote because of felony convictions. Those of removing voters from registration lists in or- county clerks began to remove voters without der to keep them up to date — are poised to be any notice. The state later discovered the purge one of the biggest threats to the ballot in 2018. list was riddled with errors: It included at least Activist groups and some state officials have 4,000 people who did not have felony convic- mounted alarming campaigns to purge voters tions.1 And among those on the list who once without adequate safeguards. If successful, these had a disqualifying conviction, up to 60 percent efforts could lead to a massive number of eligi- of those individuals were Americans who were ble, registered voters losing their right to cast a eligible to vote because they had their voting ballot this fall. rights restored back to them.2 Properly done, efforts to clean up voter rolls are The Arkansas incident also illustrates the important for election integrity and efficiency. confusion arising from many state laws that Done carelessly or hastily, such efforts are prone disenfranchise persons with past criminal to error, the effects of which are borne by vot- convictions. Nationally, more than 6 million ers who may show up to vote only to find their Americans cannot vote because of a past fel- names missing from the list.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Climate Envoy John Kerry
    March 30, 2021 The Honorable John Kerry Special Presidential Envoy for Climate United States State Department 2201 C Street NW Washington, DC 20520 Dear Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry, We the 145 undersigned organizations, many of which are members of the Stop The Money Pipeline coalition, wish to welcome you to your new role. The creation of your position, and your long history of leadership on climate change, is an important sign of the commitment the Biden administration has to achieving a 100% clean energy economy. We look forward to working with you to ensure we protect the workers and the communities on the frontlines of the climate crisis. Today we write to request your support and leadership in urgently addressing one of the most important and overlooked drivers of climate change: ending the flow of private finance from Wall Street to the industries driving climate change around the world — fossil fuels and forest-risk commodities. As Bill McKibben has written, “money is the oxygen on which the fire of global warming burns.”1 Since the Paris Agreement was signed, that fire has been raging: $3.8 trillion from global banks has flowed to fossil fuels from 2016-2020;2 over that same period, global banks invested over $191 billion in forest-risk commodities worldwide.3 The largest fossil fuel lenders, insurance providers, and institutional investors are all U.S.-headquartered firms. JPMorgan Chase has been the largest fossil fuel banker in the world by a wide margin in recent years.4 Companies like Liberty Mutual, AIG, and Chubb exacerbate climate risks by supporting increasingly risky fossil fuel development.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL Scorecard
    2020 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL scorecard SECOND SESSION OF THE 116TH CONGRESS LCV BOARD OF DIRECTORS * JOHN H. ADAMS, HONORARY RAMPA R. HORMEL, HONORARY BILL ROBERTS Natural Resources Defense Council Enlyst Fund Corridor Partners BRENT BLACKWELDER, HONORARY JOHN HUNTING, HONORARY LARRY ROCKEFELLER Friends of the Earth John Hunting & Associates American Conservation Association THE HONORABLE SHERWOOD L. BOEHLERT, MICHAEL KIESCHNICK THEODORE ROOSEVELT IV, HONORARY VICE CHAIR Green Advocacy Project CHAIR The Accord Group Barclays Capital ROGER KIM THE HONORABLE CAROL BROWNER, CHAIR Democracy Alliance KERRY SCHUMANN Former EPA Administrator Wisconsin Conservation Voters MARK MAGAÑA CARRIE CLARK GreenLatinos LAURA TURNER SEYDEL North Carolina League of Conservation Turner Foundation WINSOME MCINTOSH, HONORARY Voters The McIntosh Foundation TRIP VAN NOPPEN DONNA F. EDWARDS Earthjustice MOLLY MCUSIC Former U.S. Representative Wyss Foundation KATHLEEN WELCH MICHAEL C. FOX Corridor Partners WILLIAM H. MEADOWS III, HONORARY Eloise Capital The Wilderness Society ANTHA WILLIAMS ELAINE FRENCH Bloomberg Philanthropies GREG MOGA John and Elaine French Family Foundation Moga Investments LLC REVEREND LENNOX YEARWOOD, JR. MARIA HANDLEY Hip Hop Caucus REUBEN MUNGER Conservation Colorado Education Fund Vision Ridge Partners, LLC STEVE HOLTZMAN SCOTT NATHAN Boies Schiller Flexner LLP Center for American Progress LCV ISSUES & ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE * BRENT BLACKWELDER SUNITA LEEDS REUBEN MUNGER Friends of the Earth Enfranchisement Foundation Vision Ridge Partners,
    [Show full text]
  • January 10, 2019 Re: Legislation to Address the Urgent Threat Of
    January 10, 2019 Re: Legislation to Address the Urgent Threat of Climate Change Dear Representative: On behalf of our millions of members and supporters, we are writing today to urge you to consider the following principles as the 116th Congress debates climate change legislation and momentum around the country builds for a Green New Deal. As the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recently warned, if we are to keep global warming below 1.5°C, we must act aggressively and quickly. At a minimum, reaching that target requires visionary and affirmative legislative action in the following areas: Halt all fossil fuel leasing, phase out all fossil fuel extraction, and end fossil fuel and other dirty energy subsidies. The science is clear that fossil fuels must be kept in the ground. Pursuing new fossil fuel projects at this moment in history is folly. Most immediately, the federal government must stop selling off or leasing publicly owned lands, water, and mineral rights for development to fossil fuel producers. The government must also stop approving fossil fuel power plants and infrastructure projects. We must reverse recent legislation that ended the 40-year ban on the export of crude oil, end the export of all other fossil fuels, and overhaul relevant statutes that govern fossil fuel extraction in order to pursue a managed decline of fossil fuel production. Further, the federal government must immediately end the massive, irrational subsidies and other financial support that fossil fuel, and other dirty energy companies (such as nuclear, waste incineration and biomass energy) continue to receive both domestically and overseas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conversation with Mustafa Ali
    SEARCH [ BLOG ] UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS “You Need to Move Beyond Surviving to Thriving”: A Conversation with Mustafa Ali DERRICK Z. JACKSON, FELLOW | JUNE 1, 2017, 2:21 PM EDT Like 287 Tweet Before he resigned in March as assistant associate administrator for environmental justice at the Environmental Protection Agency, Mustafa Ali was not a household name. He received virtually no national press during his 24 years of holding the White House and 17 federal agencies accountable for embedding environmental justice into policy making. Under a 1994 executive order issued by President Clinton, every agency was supposed to identify and address “disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs on people of color and low-income communities. Ali did that work under both the Republican administrations of George H.W Bush and George W. Bush and the Democratic administrations of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. In fact, the success he has most quickly raised in interviews after his resignation is among the most bipartisan. Investing in community transformation After residents in some neighborhoods in Spartanburg, South Carolina organized around cancers and other deadly and debilitating diseases that seemed connected to Superfund and Brownfield sites, the EPA gave a community group $20,000 in 1997 as seed money to plan a healthy future. Named ReGenesis, the organization ultimately parlayed that grant into development strategies that netted more than $270 million for health centers, a community center, affordable housing, job training, transportation improvements and further environmental cleanups. A project that began under Clinton received a particularly big endorsement in 2004 by South Carolina’s Republican Senator Lindsey Graham.
    [Show full text]
  • HB 192 -- Voter Caging Prohibition Act of 2009 Sponsor: Hughes This Bill
    HB 192 -- Voter Caging Prohibition Act of 2009 Sponsor: Hughes This bill establishes the Voter Caging Prohibition Act of 2009 which: (1) Prohibits any person from using lists of ineligible voters to disqualify those wishing to vote or registering to vote unless the list contains specific information such as signatures, photographs, or unique numbers showing that the individual being challenged does not meet the statutory requirements to vote because the challenged individual is dead, has been convicted of certain crimes, has changed his or her address, or is ineligible for other reasons; (2) Prohibits any person from making challenges to disqualify those wishing to vote or registering to vote based on errors on the documents used for voter registration unless the error relates to voter eligibility; (3) Prohibits the use of documents to determine whether an individual has changed his or her address and no longer qualifies to vote unless the attempted delivery of the document used to verify his or her address was at least two election cycles before the challenge; (4) Prohibits anyone except an election authority from making a challenge unless the challenger is a registered voter in the precinct in which the challenge is being made, has first-hand knowledge of the grounds of ineligibility, documents the challenge in writing, and signs an oath under penalty of perjury that the individual being challenged is ineligible. Other procedures for a non-election authority to challenge voter eligibility are specified in the bill; (5) Allows anyone rejected from voting on election day by an election authority to vote a provisional ballot; and (6) Specifies that anyone who knowingly makes a false challenge of voter eligibility will be guilty of a class one election offense.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Justice Club Presents a Factbook on the Intersection of Social Justice and Environmental and Climate Justice
    The College of Saint Benedict and Saint John’s University’s Climate Justice Club presents a Factbook on the intersection of social justice and environmental and climate justice. During the summer of 2020, we released the Factbook Unlearning Racist Behaviors in the Climate Activist World, which addresses the intersection of climate justice and environmental racism. The purpose of this factbook is to encourage our audience to utilize the sources in an effort to educate themselves about the disproportionate impact polluting industries have on communities of color. Social Justice in the Environmental Movement: A Factbook to Explore and Learn About the Intersection of Social Justice & Environmental and Climate Justice expands on our past factbook by not only considering how our club’s mission overlaps with racial justice, but with social justice as a whole. Please visit NAACP’s website to learn more about environmental and climate justice. Climate Justice Club encourages you to read through these resources to understand/learn why there is no climate justice without social justice. Please view the Table of Contents to explore the various media presented throughout the Factbook; there are resources for everyone! We believe it is pertinent that we continue educating ourselves and turn this learning into collective action. Share with us the information that stuck out most to you, and promote it on social media! We would like to credit the organization/platform Intersectional Environmentalist for providing some of the resources found throughout the Factbook. Authored by Maggie Morin With Support by Con Brady, Melissa Burrell, Valerie Doze, Tamia Francois, & Carolyn Rowley In Collaboration with Saint John’s Outdoor University 1 Table of Contents Items below are hyperlinked for your convenience.
    [Show full text]