DOCSLIB.ORG

Comprehensive Bibliographies on Primary and Supergene Ni-Cu-PGE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comprehensive Bibliographies on Primary and Supergene Ni-Cu-PGE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Comprehensive Bibliographies on Primary and Supergene Ni-Cu-PGE Mineralization Associated with Komatiitic and Mafic Intrusions in Australasia, on Layered Mafic Intrusions in Australasia, and on the Dufek Intrusion, Antarctica By Gerald K. Czamanske^, David I. Groves^, John A. Bunting^, and Anthony V. Brown^ Open-File Report 87-412-A Prepared in cooperation with IGCP Project 161 ^U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California. ^Department of Geology, University of Western Australia. ^B.H.P. Minerals, Perth, Western Australia. ^Geological Survey of Tasmania, Hobart. Comprehensive Bibliographies on Primary and Supergene Mi-Cu-PGE Mineralization Associated with Komatiitic and Mafic Intrusions in Australasia, on Layered Mafic Intrusions in Australasia, and on the Dufek Intrusion, Antarctica Compiled by Gerald K. Czamanske, David I. Groves, John A. Bunting, and Anthony V. Brown These bibliographies have been compiled at the U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California, under the auspices of Project 161 of the International Geological Correlation Program, entitled "Sulfide Deposits in Mafic and Ultraraafic Rocks." Part of a series of bibliographies being compiled for the entire world, they are considered to be complete through 1986. Compilation of the bibliographies was begun by searching the computerized data bases of scientific literature referred to as GeoRef (American Geological Institute) and CA Search (Chemical Abstracts), using two search strategies: A + (B or C or D or E) + F or G + F where A = nickel or cobalt or platinum or pentlandite B = mineralization or ore deposit or dissemination or mine C = ultramafic or ultrabasic or dunite or peridptite or harzburgite D = gabbro or anorthosite or norite E = economic geology F = a geographic region, and G = layered intrusion or cumulate Specifically excluded from the bibliography on mineralized occurrences are references relating to Ni, Cu, or Pt-group-element mineralization associated with other than mafic igneous rocks. References to mafic rocks considered to be ophiolitic in character are excluded from the bibliography on unmineralized layered mafic intrusions, as are references to innumerable occurrences of unmineralized noncumulate gabbroic rocks. The bibliography on unmineralized mafic intrusions complements that for known mineralization; it provides the researcher with contrast and the prospector with potential. The bibliography on nickel deposits of Western Australian includes all relevant references cited in Geological Survey of Western Australia Mineral Resource Bulletin 14, "Nickel Mineralization in Western Australia," by R. J. Marston. This 271-page volume contains a wealth of information, including references to many unpublished reports which we do not cite here. Readers should also be aware that many unreferenced short articles are contained in University of Western Australia Geology Department and Extension Service Publication 7, "Regional geology and nickel deposits of the Norseman-Wiluna Belt, Western Australia," edited by D. I. Groves and C. M. Lesher for IGCP project 91 and 161 field conferences in 1982. We thank the many individuals who helped make these bibliographies accurate and comprehensive. Especially noteworthy were the contributions of Mark Barley, University of Western Australia; D. Russel Hudson; A. L. Jaques; Charter Mathison; and Sue Thornett, B.H.P. Minerals, Perth. Because large bibliographies on mafic intrusions in other parts of the world were being compiled concurrently, time has not been available for inspection and verification of many of the citations; for this we apologize. Users of these bibliographies are encouraged to report any errors to Gerald K. Czamanske so that they may be corrected. In a similar spirit, users are encouraged to send notice of any reports published before 1987 that have been inadvertently omitted. Consistency of citation style has benefited from review by George Havach of the U.S. Geological Survey. The efforts of Pauline C. Bennett during early stages of compilation are gratefully acknowledged. This report is being issued in two forms, representing slightly differing versions. Version A, issued as paper copy, incorporates foreign diacritics. Version B, issued as an IBM-compatible diskette, affords users the great benefit of an online bibliography, but is formatted only in the standard ASCII character set. BIBLIOGRAPHY ON WESTERN AUSTRALIAN Ni SULFIDE DEPOSITS Andrews, P. B., 1975, Spargoville nickel deposits, in Knight, C. L., ed., Economic geology of Australia and Papua New Guinea. I. Metals: Parkville, Victoria, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Monograph Series, no. 5, p. 89-91. Anonymous, 1975, The Poseidon story: Western Australia*s Cinderella nickel producer goes on-line with a 1 million-mtpy sulphide flotation concentrator one day ahead of schedule: Engineering and Mining Journal, v. 176, p. 53-62. 1978, Prospecting for nickel; Western Australia: Geological Survey of Western Australia Information Pamphlet 6, 20 p. 1969, The nickel finds around Kalgoorlie: Australian Mining, v. 61, no. 3, p. 59. Arndt, C. D., 1980, Carnilya Hill Ni-mineralization, Yilgarn Block, W.A.: Journal of Geochemical Exploration, v. 12, p. 171-173. Baker, M., and Dawson, P. E., 1980, Nickel ore mining at Redross, W.A., by Anaconda/CRA, in Woodcock, J. T., ed., Mining and metallurgical practices in Australasia: Parkville, Victoria, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Monograph Series, no. 10, p. 559-560. Barker, W. W., Bussel, M., Fletcher, A. B., Hill, R. E., Hudson, D. R., Nickel, E. H., Ramsden, A. R., and Thornber, M. R., 1975, Nickel deposits: Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Minerals Research Laboratories Annual Report 1974-75, p. 12-14. Barrett, F. M., Binns, R. A., Groves, D. I., Marston, R. J., and McQueen, K. G., 1977, Structural history and metamorphic modification of Archean volcanic-type nickel deposits, Yilgarn Block, Western Australia: Economic Geology, v. 72, p. 1195-1223. Barrett, F. M., Binns, R. A., Gunthorpe, R. J., McQueen, K. G., and Marston, R. J., 1976, Metamorphic modification of Archean nickel deposits, Western Australia: International Geological Congress, 25th, Sydney, 1976, Abstracts, v. 1, p. 111. Barrett, F. M., Groves, D. I., and Binns, R. A., 1976, Importance of metamorphic processes of the Nepean nickel deposit, Western Australia: London, Institution of Mining and Metallurgy Transactions, sec. B, v. 85, p. 252-273. Barry, J., 1974, Geochemistry of the Scotia nickel deposit in relation to exploration: Adelaide, South Australia, University of Adelaide, Ph.D. thesis, 99 p. Bavinton, 0. A., 1979, Interflow sedimentary rocks from the Kambalda ultramafic sequence; their geochemistry, metamorphism and genesis: Canberra, New South Wales, Australian National University, Ph.D. thesis, 196 p. Bavinton, O. A., 1981, The nature of sulfidic metasediments at Kambalda and their broad relationships with associated ultramafic rocks and nickel ores: Economic Geology, v. 76, p. 1606-1628. Bavinton, O. A., and Keays, R. R., 1978, Precious metal values from interflow sedimentary rocks from the komatiite sequence at Kambalda, Western Australia: Geochiraica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 42, p. 1151-1163. Bayer, H., and Siemes, H., 1971, Zur Interpretation von Pyrrhotin-Gefugen: Mineralium Deposita, v. 6, p. 225-244. Bennett, C. E. G., Graham, J., Parks, T. C., and Thornber, M. R., 1972, New observations on natural pyrrhotites. Part II. Lamellar magnetite in monoclinic pyrrhotite: American Mineralogist, v. 57, p. 1876-1880. Bennett, C. E. G., Graham, J., and Thornber, M. R., 1972, New observations on natural pyrrhotites. Part I. Mineragraphic techniques: American Mineralogist, v. 57, p. 445-462. Besson, M., 1976, Le chimisme des roches ultrabasiques mineralisees en sulfures de nickel d*Australie occidentale: France, Bureau Recherches Geologiques et Minieres Bulletin, ser. 2, sec. 2, no. 2, p. 185-213. Besson, M., Meyer, G., and Treuil, M., 1980, Approche geochimique; Caracterisation et discrimination geochimiques des ensembles favorables et defavorables; VI, Elements traces et terres rares dans quelques metapicrites d f Australia occidentale [Geochemical approach; geochemical characterization and discrimination of favorable and unfavorable complexes; VI. Trace elements and rare earths in Western Australian metapicrites]: France, Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres Memoir 97, p. 159-166. Billington, L. G., 1984, Geological review of the Agnew nickel deposit, Western Australia, in Buchanan, D. L., and Jones, M. J., eds., Sulfide deposits in mafic and ultraraafic rocks: London, Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, p. 43-54. Binns, R. A., and Champness, P. E., 1985, Analytical electron microscope study of red-brown olivines in ultraraafic rocks from the Yilgarn Block, W. A., in Morris, R. C., and others, eds., Research review 1985: Canberra, New South Wales, CSIRO Division of Mineralogy and Geochemistry, p. 32-33. Binns, R. A., and Groves, D. I., 1976, Iron-nickel partition in metamorphosed olivine-sulfide assemblages from Perseverance, Western Australia: American Mineralogist, v. 61, p. 782-787. Binns, R. A., Groves, D. I., and Gunthorpe, R. J., 1977, Nickel sulphides in Archaean ultramafic rocks of Western Australia, in Sidorenko, A. V., ed., Correlation of the Precarabrian (Korrelyatsiya dokembriya): Moscow, Nauka, v. 2, p. 349-380. Binns, R. A., Gunthorpe, R. J., and Groves, D. I., 1976, Metamorphic patterns
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mineral Processing
    Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Infrare D Transmission Spectra of Carbonate Minerals
    Infrare d Transmission Spectra of Carbonate Mineral s THE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM Infrare d Transmission Spectra of Carbonate Mineral s G. C. Jones Department of Mineralogy The Natural History Museum London, UK and B. Jackson Department of Geology Royal Museum of Scotland Edinburgh, UK A collaborative project of The Natural History Museum and National Museums of Scotland E3 SPRINGER-SCIENCE+BUSINESS MEDIA, B.V. Firs t editio n 1 993 © 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Originally published by Chapman & Hall in 1993 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1993 Typese t at the Natura l Histor y Museu m ISBN 978-94-010-4940-5 ISBN 978-94-011-2120-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-2120-0 Apar t fro m any fair dealin g for the purpose s of researc h or privat e study , or criticis m or review , as permitte d unde r the UK Copyrigh t Design s and Patent s Act , 1988, thi s publicatio n may not be reproduced , stored , or transmitted , in any for m or by any means , withou t the prio r permissio n in writin g of the publishers , or in the case of reprographi c reproductio n onl y in accordanc e wit h the term s of the licence s issue d by the Copyrigh t Licensin g Agenc y in the UK, or in accordanc e wit h the term s of licence s issue d by the appropriat e Reproductio n Right s Organizatio n outsid e the UK. Enquirie s concernin g reproductio n outsid e the term s state d here shoul d be sent to the publisher s at the Londo n addres s printe d on thi s page.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaspéite-Magnesite Solid Solutions and Their Significance
    78 Advances in Regolith GASPÉITE-MAGNESITE SOLID SOLUTIONS AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE Meagan E. Clissold, Peter Leverett & Peter A. Williams School of Science, Food and Horticulture, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC NSW 1797 It is a surprising fact that, despite the increasing number of secondary minerals of Ni(II) recognized from oxidized base metal deposits (Anthony et al. 2003), the supergene chemistry responsible for their formation remains poorly understood. An understanding of this chemistry would be desirable in view of its importance with respect to geochemical exploration for the element, its behaviour in the regolith and the potential development of commercially exploitable secondary nickel resources. Of the secondary nickel minerals known, gaspéite, NiCO3, is perhaps the most common and has been observed in a number of Western Australian deposits. Notable among these is the 132 pit at Widgiemooltha, near Kambalda, WA (Nickel et al.1994). The supergene profile of the 132 pit consists of 5 zones: oxide, carbonate, violarite-pyrite, transition and primary zone. The carbonate zone is 3-12 m below surface and is characterized by the occurrence of a number of flat-lying to sub-horizontal veins of gaspéite that cut across altered wall rock comprising tremolite and goethite. These veins extend from what was a large sulfide body across the matrix layer. Single gaspéite veins have a size of 5 x 5 x 0.05 m on average and may occur in masses of up to 10 x 10 x 1 m; they are typically massive to either granular or fibrous. From the lower part of the carbonate zone upwards there is a progressive decrease in the amount of gaspéite and other carbonate minerals, and their respective nickel contents.
    [Show full text]
  • Violarite Fe2+Ni S4
    2+ 3+ Violarite Fe Ni2 S4 c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Cubic. Point Group: 4/m 32/m. As nodules up to 0.5 cm and massive. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Perfect on {001}. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 4.5–5.5 VHN = 455–493 (100 g load). D(meas.) = n.d. D(calc.) = 4.79 Optical Properties: Opaque. Color: Violet-gray; distinctly violet in reflected light. Luster: Metallic. R: (400) 39.0, (420) 39.6, (440) 40.2, (460) 40.6, (480) 41.0, (500) 41.4, (520) 41.9, (540) 42.5, (560) 43.1, (580) 43.8, (600) 44.3, (620) 44.8, (640) 45.4, (660) 45.8, (680) 46.2, (700) 46.6 Cell Data: Space Group: Fd3m. a = 9.51 Z = 8 X-ray Powder Pattern: Vermilion mine, Sudbury, Canada. 2.85 (100), 1.674 (80), 1.820 (60), 2.36 (50), 1.059 (50), 1.183 (40), 1.115 (40) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) Fe 17.01 19.33 18.52 Ni 38.68 33.94 38.94 Co 1.05 2.50 Cu 1.12 1.05 S 41.68 42.17 42.54 insol. 0.40 1.31 Total 99.94 100.30 100.00 (1) Vermilion mine, Sudbury, Canada; contains trace chalcopyrite. (2) Friday mine, Julian, California, USA; contains trace chalcopyrite. (3) FeNi2S4. Mineral Group: Linnaeite group. Occurrence: Of hydrothermal origin, with other sulfides. Association: Pyrrhotite, millerite, chalcopyrite, pentlandite. Distribution: In the USA, from the Friday mine, Julian, San Diego Co., California; the Key West mine, Clark Co., Nevada; the Copper King mine, Gold Hill district, Boulder Co., Colorado; the Lick Fork deposit, Floyd Co., Virginia; and the Gap Nickel mine, Lancaster Co., Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Mineral Ecology: Predicting the Undiscovered Minerals of Carbon
    American Mineralogist, Volume 101, pages 889–906, 2016 Carbon mineral ecology: Predicting the undiscovered minerals of carbon ROBERT M. HAZEN1,*, DANIEL R. HUMMER1, GRETHE HYSTAD2, ROBERT T. DOWNS3, AND JOSHUA J. GOLDEN3 1Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution, 5251 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20015, U.S.A. 2Department of Mathematics, Computer Science, and Statistics, Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, Indiana 46323, U.S.A. 3Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 East 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0077, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Studies in mineral ecology exploit mineralogical databases to document diversity-distribution rela- tionships of minerals—relationships that are integral to characterizing “Earth-like” planets. As carbon is the most crucial element to life on Earth, as well as one of the defining constituents of a planet’s near-surface mineralogy, we focus here on the diversity and distribution of carbon-bearing minerals. We applied a Large Number of Rare Events (LNRE) model to the 403 known minerals of carbon, using 82 922 mineral species/locality data tabulated in http://mindat.org (as of 1 January 2015). We find that all carbon-bearing minerals, as well as subsets containing C with O, H, Ca, or Na, conform to LNRE distributions. Our model predicts that at least 548 C minerals exist on Earth today, indicating that at least 145 carbon-bearing mineral species have yet to be discovered. Furthermore, by analyzing subsets of the most common additional elements in carbon-bearing minerals (i.e., 378 C + O species; 282 C + H species; 133 C + Ca species; and 100 C + Na species), we predict that approximately 129 of these missing carbon minerals contain oxygen, 118 contain hydrogen, 52 contain calcium, and more than 60 contain sodium.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfide Minerals in the G and H Chromitite Zones of the Stillwater Complex, Montana
    Sulfide Minerals in the G and H Chromitite Zones of the Stillwater Complex, Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 694 Sulfide Minerals in the G and H Chromitite Zones of the Stillwater Complex, Montana By NORMAN J PAGE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 694 The relationship of the amount, relative abundance, and size of grains of selected sulfide minerals to the crystallization of a basaltic magma UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of CongresR catalog-card No. 70-610589 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printin&' Otrice Washin&'ton, D.C. 20402 - Price 35 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 Introduction________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Acknowledgments--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Sulfide occurrences-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Sulfide inclusions in cumulus minerals_____________________________________________________________________________ 4 Fabrtc______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 Phase assemblages__________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals Found in Michigan Listed by County
    Michigan Minerals Listed by Mineral Name Based on MI DEQ GSD Bulletin 6 “Mineralogy of Michigan” Actinolite, Dickinson, Gogebic, Gratiot, and Anthonyite, Houghton County Marquette counties Anthophyllite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirinaugite, Marquette County Antigorite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirine, Marquette County Apatite, Baraga, Dickinson, Houghton, Iron, Albite, Dickinson, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Kalkaska, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Monroe and Marquette counties counties Algodonite, Baraga, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Aphrosiderite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette Ontonagon counties counties Allanite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette counties Apophyllite, Houghton, and Keweenaw counties Almandite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, and Marquette Aragonite, Gogebic, Iron, Jackson, Marquette, and counties Monroe counties Alunite, Iron County Arsenopyrite, Marquette, and Menominee counties Analcite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Atacamite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Anatase, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Augite, Dickinson, Genesee, Gratiot, Houghton, Iron, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Andalusite, Iron, and Marquette counties Awarurite, Marquette County Andesine, Keweenaw County Axinite, Gogebic, and Marquette counties Andradite, Dickinson County Azurite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Anglesite, Marquette County Ontonagon counties Anhydrite, Bay, Berrien, Gratiot, Houghton, Babingtonite, Keweenaw County Isabella, Kalamazoo, Kent, Keweenaw, Macomb, Manistee,
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Scanned
    THE AMERICAN MINERAIOGIST, VOL.51 AUGUST' 1966 TABLE 3 These concentrationranges were arbitrarily selected' Ag Antimonpearceite Empressite Novakite Aramayoite Fizelyite Owyheeite Argentojarosite Jalpaite Pavonite Arsenopolybasite Marrite Ramdohrite Benjaminite Moschellandsbergite see also Unnamed Minerals 30-32 AI Abukumalite Calcium ferri-phosphate Ferrocarpholite Ajoite Carbonate-cyanotrichite Fersmite Akaganeite Chalcoalumite Fraipontite Aluminocopiapite Chukhrovite Galarite Alumohydrocalcite Clinoptilolite Garronite Alvanite Coeruleolactite Glaucokerinite Aminoffite Cofrnite Goldmanite Anthoinite Combeite Gordonite Arandisite Corrensite Giitzenite Armenite Crandallite Grovesite Ashcroftine Creedite Guildite Ba:ralsite Cryptomelane Gutsevichite Barbertonite Cymrite Harkerite Basaluminite Cyrilovite Ilibonite Bayerite Davisonite Hidalgoite Bearsite Deerite H6gbomite Beidellite Delhayelite Hydrobasaluminite Beryllite Dickite Hydrocalumite Bialite Doloresite flydrogrossular Bikitaite Eardleyite Hydroscarbroite Boehmite Elpasolite Hydrougrandite Blggildite Endellite Indialite Bolivarite Englishite Iron cordierite Brammallite Ephesite Jarlite Brazilianire Erionite Johachidolite Brownmillerite Falkenstenite Juanite Buddingtonite Faustite Jusite Cadwaladerite Ferrazite Kalsilite Cafetite Ferrierite Karnasurtite 1336 GROUPSBY E.LEM\:,NTS 1337 Karpinskyite Orlite Stenonite Katoptrite Orthochamosite Sudoite Kehoeite Osarizawaite Sursassite Kennedyite Osumilite Swedenborgite Kimzeyite Overite Taaffeite Kingite Painite Tacharanite Knipovichite
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Minerals of the Jáchymov Ore District
    Journal of the Czech Geological Society 48/34(2003) 19 Primary minerals of the Jáchymov ore district Primární minerály jáchymovského rudního revíru (237 figs, 160 tabs) PETR ONDRU1 FRANTIEK VESELOVSKÝ1 ANANDA GABAOVÁ1 JAN HLOUEK2 VLADIMÍR REIN3 IVAN VAVØÍN1 ROMAN SKÁLA1 JIØÍ SEJKORA4 MILAN DRÁBEK1 1 Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 3, CZ-118 21 Prague 1 2 U Roháèových kasáren 24, CZ-100 00 Prague 10 3 Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics, V Holeovièkách 41, CZ-182 09, Prague 8 4 National Museum, Václavské námìstí 68, CZ-115 79, Prague 1 One hundred and seventeen primary mineral species are described and/or referenced. Approximately seventy primary minerals were known from the district before the present study. All known reliable data on the individual minerals from Jáchymov are presented. New and more complete X-ray powder diffraction data for argentopyrite, sternbergite, and an unusual (Co,Fe)-rammelsbergite are presented. The follow- ing chapters describe some unknown minerals, erroneously quoted minerals and imperfectly identified minerals. The present work increases the number of all identified, described and/or referenced minerals in the Jáchymov ore district to 384. Key words: primary minerals, XRD, microprobe, unit-cell parameters, Jáchymov. History of mineralogical research of the Jáchymov Chemical analyses ore district Polished sections were first studied under the micro- A systematic study of Jáchymov minerals commenced scope for the identification of minerals and definition early after World War II, during the period of 19471950. of their relations. Suitable sections were selected for This work was aimed at supporting uranium exploitation. electron microprobe (EMP) study and analyses, and in- However, due to the general political situation and the teresting domains were marked.
    [Show full text]
  • In Situ FTIR Study of CO2 Reduction on Inorganic Analogues of Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenase† Cite This: Chem
    ChemComm View Article Online COMMUNICATION View Journal | View Issue In situ FTIR study of CO2 reduction on inorganic analogues of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase† Cite this: Chem. Commun., 2021, 57, 3267 Ji-Eun Lee, a Akira Yamaguchi, ab Hideshi Ooka, a Tomohiro Kazami,b Received 6th November 2020, Masahiro Miyauchi, b Norio Kitadai cd and Ryuhei Nakamura *ac Accepted 4th January 2021 DOI: 10.1039/d0cc07318k rsc.li/chemcomm The CO2-to-CO reduction by carbon monoxide dehydrogenase capture and utilization compared to more complex pathways, (CODH) with a [NiFe4S4] cluster is considered to be the oldest such as the Calvin cycle, which is the most widespread carbon pathway of biological carbon fixation and therefore may have been fixation pathway in the biosphere today. involved in the origin of life. Although previous studies have Under anaerobic conditions, carbon fixation in the W–L Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. investigated CO2 reduction by Fe and Ni sulfides to identify the pathway is initiated by the reduction of CO2 to CO by carbon prebiotic origin of the [NiFe4S4] cluster, the reaction mechanism monoxide dehydrogenase (CODH), which utilizes a highly conserved 3 remains largely elusive. Herein, we applied in situ electrochemical [NiFe4S4] cluster as the catalytic site (Scheme 1a). The generated CO ATR-FTIR spectroscopy to probe the reaction intermediates of can be combined with a methyl group (–CH3)toformathioester, greigite (Fe3S4) and violarite (FeNi2S4). Intermediate species assign- acetyl-CoA, which is a central metabolite of biological carbon 2,4 able to surface-bound CO2 and formyl groups were found to be metabolism (Scheme 1b).
    [Show full text]
  • MAGMATIC SULFIDE DEPOSITS (MODELS 1, 2B, 5A, 5B, 6A, 6B, and 7A; Page, 1986A-G)
    MAGMATIC SULFIDE DEPOSITS (MODELS 1, 2b, 5a, 5b, 6a, 6b, and 7a; Page, 1986a-g) by Michael P. Foose, Michael L. Zientek, and Douglas P. Klein SUMMARY OF RELEVANT GEOLOGIC, GEOENVIRONMENTAL, AND GEOPHYSICAL INFORMATION Deposit geology Magmatic sulfide deposits are sulfide mineral concentrations in mafic and ultramafic rocks derived from immiscible sulfide liquids. A number of schemes exist for subdividing these deposits. Most are based on the tectonic setting and petrologic characteristics of the mafic and ultramafic rocks (Page and others, 1982; Naldrett, 1989), or on the spatial association of mineralized rock with enclosing ultramafic and mafic host rocks (stratabound, discordant, marginal, and other; Hulbert and others, 1988). Page (1986a-g) presented discussions of several different subtypes based, in part, on both these approaches (Models 1, 2b, 5a, 5b, 6a, 6b, and 7a). However, these deposits are similar enough that they can be treated as a group with regard to their geoenvironmental manifestations. The similarity of these deposits result, in part, from similar genesis. Exsolution of immiscible sulfide liquids from mafic-to-ultramafic magmas is the fundamental process that forms magmatic sulfide deposits. Once formed, droplets of immiscible sulfide liquid settle through less dense silicate magma. The sulfide liquid acts as a "collector" for cobalt, copper, nickel, and platinum-group elements (PGE) because these elements are preferentially concentrated in sulfide liquids at levels 10 to 100,000 times those in silicate liquids. To a lesser degree, iron is also preferentially partitioned into the sulfide liquid and, because of its greater abundance, most immiscible sulfide liquid is iron-rich. The combination of physically concentrating dense sulfide liquid and chemically concentrating elements in the sulfide liquid is responsible for forming most economically minable, magmatic-sulfide deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation Study of Pentlandite/Pyrrhotite to Violarite
    252 Regolith 2005 – Ten Years of CRC LEME THE TRANSFORMATION OF PENTLANDITE TO VIOLARITE UNDER MILD HYDROTHERMAL CONDITIONS: A DISSOLUTION- REPRECIPITATION REACTION Allan Pring1,2, Christophe Tenailleau,1 Barbara Etschmann1, Joel Brugger1,3 & Ben Grguric4 1Department of Mineralogy, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000 2School of Earth & Environmental Science, University of Adelaide, SA, 5005 2CRC LEME, School of Earth & Environmental Science, University of Adelaide, SA, 5005 4Minerals Exploration, BHP Billiton Ltd., PO Box 91, Belmont, WA, 6984 INTRODUCTION Violarite, FeNi2S4, occurs abundantly in the supergene alteration zones of many massive and disseminated Ni sulfide deposits, where it replaces primary nickel sulfide minerals such as pentlandite (Nickel 1973, Misra & Fleet 1974). The nickel deposits of Western Australia’s Yilgarn Craton have deep weathering profiles and supergene violarite constitutes a considerable proportion of the ore in some of these deposits. Thus, violarite is probably the most economically important member of the thiospinel mineral group. Violarite can also form as a primary phase by exsolution during the cooling of pentlandite ((Fe,Ni)9S8) (Grguric 2002). Understanding the thermodynamics and kinetics of the formation of violarite in the weathering profile is important for understanding alteration patterns in and around nickel deposits and has significant implications for ore processing. Supergene violarite is generally very fine-grained and relatively porous and it has a poor response in the floatation systems used to treat many massive sulfide ores. On the other hand, a proportion of violarite in the nickel concentrate facilitates smelting, as the burning of violarite is a highly exothermic reaction (Dunn & Howes 1996).
    [Show full text]