DOCSLIB.ORG

Midwest Fruit Pest Management Guide 2021 - 2022

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Midwest Fruit Pest Management Guide 2021 - 2022 Midwest Fruit Pest Management Guide 2021 - 2022 Arkansas University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service AG1304 Illinois University of Illinois Extension ICSG-18 Indiana Purdue Extension ID-465 Iowa Iowa State University Extension and Outreach HORT 3035 Kansas Kansas State Research and Extension MF3278 Kentucky University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service ID-232 Minnesota University of Minnesota Extension Ohio Ohio State University Extension Bulletin 506 Wisconsin University of Wisconsin-Extension A4104 About This Guide The Midwest Fruit Pest Management Guide 2021-2022 was developed by the Midwest Fruit Workers Group. Members of the Midwest Fruit Workers Group are in the process of changing the format of this publication. We hope the new versions (for apples and grapes) make it easier for producers to find the accurate information they need for managing pests in fruit crops. We believe this new format provides readers with information that is concise and easy to understand. We are working to transition the rest of the guide to this format. We welcome your comments, criticisms and suggestions. The print copy guide of the guide will be revised every other year. Updated version of the guide can be found at: https://ag.purdue.edu/hla/Hort/Documents/ID-465.pdf Printed copies of this publication are available from the Purdue Extension Education Store, www.edustore. purdue. edu. A free PDF download also is available from the Education Store or from your state’s cooperative extension service. The group wishes to acknowledge the organization abilities of Lina Rodriguez-Salamanca and Joseph Hannan in converting files into database format. Table layout and database development was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Crop Protection and Pest Management Program through the North Central IPM Center (2018-70006-28883). This was a monumental undertaking that we hope will improve the updating and accu- racy of this guide. Fungicide efficacy tables for all crops were compiled by Megan Heller-Haas and Janna Beckerman. This work was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture, National Institutes of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA) grant number 2017-70006-27140/IND11460G4-1013877. The Midwest Fruit Workers Group also publishes companions to this guide, including the Midwest Small Fruit Pest Management Handbook and Midwest Tree Fruit Pest Management Handbook. Contact your state Cooperative Extension office for information about these publications. Midwest Small Fruit Pest Management Handbook The Midwest Small Fruit Pest Management Handbook is a companion publication to this guide. It contains additional in- formation about control strategies for small fruit diseases, insect pests, and weeds. Pesticide safety, sprayer calibration, plant nutrition, and weed identification are also covered. Copies of the publication (Ohio State University Extension Bulletin 861) may be available from your state Extension office or from Ohio State University Extension Publications, 385 Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210-1044, 614-292-1607. You can also order it from Ohioline, ohioline.osu.edu. Midwest Tree Fruit Pest Management Handbook The Midwest Tree Fruit Pest Management Handbook also is a companion to this guide. It contains additional information about pesticide safety, sprayer calibration, tree fruit diseases, insect pests, and weeds, pesticide characteristics, growth regulators, spray adjuvants, and other related topics. Copies are available from your state Extension service. Legal Responsibilities for Pesticide Use The pesticides suggested in this publication have been registered by the Pesticides Regulation Division of the Environ- mental Protection Agency. At the time of printing, these pesticides were registered for use as indicated on the individ- ual product labels. These registrations can change at any time. To keep informed of the latest updates on pesticide registrations, the Web version of this publication is updated regularly. It is available from the Purdue Extension Education Store, https://ag.purdue.edu/hla/Hort/Documents/ID-465.pdf Your responsibility as a pesticide user is to read and follow all current label directions for the specific pesticide being used. Strictly observe the legal limitations on the use of these pesticides to prevent excessive residues in or on har- vested fruit. All growers should read product labels, follow directions carefully, and observe pre-harvest intervals and application rates. Pesticide labels are available on the following sites: CDMS.net/label-Database; Agrian.com; and through many suppliers’ websites. Not all products listed in this guide are registered in every state. To be sure a product is registered in your state, check the National Pesticide Information Retrieval Service: npirspublic.ceris.purdue.edu. Some of the pesticides suggested in this publication are on the EPA Restricted Use List, and users must be certified pri- vate applicators to purchase and apply these materials. Record-keeping requirements are more stringent for restricted use pesticides. Remember: The pesticide label is a legal document. Midwest Fruit Pest Management Contents Guide 2021-2022 Forward . 3 Apple . 13 Editors-in-Chief Pear . 60 Janna Beckerman, Purdue University Lina Rodriguez-Salamanca, Iowa State University Cherry . 72 Peach . 87 Section Editors Plum . 105 Kacie Athey, University of Illinois Special Problems and Pests of Stone Fruit . 111 Janna Beckerman and Elizabeth Long, Purdue University Ric Bessin and John Strang, University of Kentucky Grape . 119 Christelle Guedot, University of Wisconsin Blueberry . .151 Donald Lewis and Lina Rodriguez-Salamanca, Iowa State University Raspberry and Blackberry . 161 Melanie Lewis-Ivey and Celeste Welty, Ohio State University Strawberry . 172 Contributors Vole Control . 185. University of Illinois: Kacie Athey, Mohammad Babadoost and Fungicide PHIs and REIs . 187 Elizabeth Wahle Insecticide and Miticide PHIs and REIs . 188 Iowa State University: Joseph Hannan, Donald Lewis and Growth Regulator PHIs and REIs . 194 Lina Rodriguez-Salamanca Chemical Weed Control in Fruit Crops . 195 University of Kansas: Rodrigo Onofre Generic Pesticides . 218 University of Kentucky: Ric Bessin, John Strang, Nicole W . Gauthier, Generic Herbicides . .221 Chris Smigell and Shawn Wright Suggested Recordkeeping Form for Restricted Use Pesticide . 224 University of Minnesota: Annie Klodd Fruit Grower Newsletters . 226 Ohio State University: Melanie Lewis-Ivey, Celeste Welty Pesticide Drift Communication Tools . 227 Purdue University: Janna Beckerman, Bruce Bordelon, Megan Heller Haas, Using a Plant Diagnostic Lab . 227 Elizabeth Long, Stephen Meyers and Tristand Tucker Pesticide Applicator Safety Education Programs . 230 University of Wisconsin: Christelle Guedot, Leslie Holland Pesticide Emergency and Poison Control Centers . 231 Conversion Factors for Weights and Measures . 232 this information to set up your own spray program. Foreword You should keep accurate records of materials used, Commercial fruit production has become a highly application dates, areas treated, growth stages, and skilled, technical profession. Concerns about pesticide weather conditions. Sample record sheets are on pages residues, operator risks, and the environment dictate 224-225. In case of questions, nothing beats a good that all fruit growers exercise extreme caution in the set of records. The EPA requires records for restricted use of all pesticides, and indeed, all chemicals. The use pesticide applications. Some states may require Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated records for general use pesticides (e.g., Kentucky has a number of fruit pesticides as “restricted use.” Growers this requirement). who plan to use these restricted materials must be certified as private applicators. Handling Pesticides Certification requires that applicators understand the 1. Know the pesticide toxicity and act accordingly. following: labels and labeling, safety factors, potential 2. When mixing pesticides do not breathe the dust, environmental concerns, identification of common powder, or vapor. Always mix outdoors. pests encountered, pesticides and their use, proper equipment use, application techniques, and applicable 3. Do not use tobacco, eat, or drink when handling or state and federal regulations. Training programs are applying pesticides. offered to help you in certification. Contact your 4. Stay out of drift from spray or dust. county Extension office for information. 5. Rinse liquid containers with water at least three The pest management recommendations in this times and pour rinsate into spray tank as it is being guide have been formulated to provide you with filled. Punch holes in metal and plastic containers up-to-date information about pesticides and their and crush. Dispose of these and all other pesticide applicability to your problem. We suggest that you use containers where no contamination of crops or 3 water supply can occur. Do not reuse pesticide 9. Inform all workers of re-entry restrictions and containers. information on safe pesticide use and/or training to 6. Use an adequate respirator and protective clothing, meet OSHA requirements. especially when mixing pesticides. Necessary 10. Comply with the Right-To-Know law. Have protective equipment is listed on pesticide labels. complete product labels readily available for 7. Have a “buddy” around when using acutely toxic workers to see. Have the Material Safety Data Sheet organophosphates,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is Wine?
    Developing a Consumer Language to Describe Local Red Wines Using Projective Mapping by Heather Jantzi Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Nutrition with Honours Acadia University March, 2017 ©Copyright by Heather Jantzi, 2017 This thesis by Heather Jantzi is accepted in its present form by the School of Nutrition and Dietetics as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours Approved by the Thesis Supervisor __________________________ ____________________ Dr. Matt McSweeney Date Approved by the Head of the Department __________________________ ____________________ Dr. Catherine Morley Date Approved by the Honours Committee __________________________ ____________________ Dr. Jun Yang Date ii I, Heather Jantzi, grant permission to the University Librarian at Acadia University to reproduce, loan or distribute copies of my thesis in microform, paper or electronic formats on a non-profit basis. I however, retain the copyright in my thesis. _________________________________ Signature of Author _________________________________ Date iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank Dr. Matthew McSweeney for supervising this research project. His ongoing support and constructive feedback took away my fears of writing a thesis, and his humour and energy made my learning experience more enjoyable than I ever anticipated. I also extend great thanks to Dr. Catherine Morley; her enthusiasm for nutrition research inspired me to pursue a topic I was passionate about and her outstanding teaching skills provided me with the foundations I needed to turn my research curiosities into reality. Thank you to my parents, Brad and Kristine Jantzi, for encouraging me to make the most out of my university experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Grape Disease Control 2018
    GRAPE DISEASE CONTROL, 2018 Bryan Hed, Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, Penn State University, Lake Erie Regional Grape Research and Extension Center, North East PA 16428 ([email protected]) As many of you know Wayne Wilcox, who has annually provided us with an incredibly thorough grape disease management update each spring, has retired. Filling Wayne's shoes is going to be a tall task to say the least, and the search for his replacement goes on. For now, I will attempt to provide a brief summary of some of the pertinent changes in grape disease control that I hope will be useful for grape growers in the 2018 season. For consistency, I'll roughly be using Wayne's format from his previous newsletter from June of 2017. FUNGICIDE CHANGES, NEWS, & REVIEWS Here is some new, and sort of new information regarding grape fungicides in 2018. First, Aprovia/Aprovia Top. The active ingredient in Aprovia is solatenol (benzovindiflupyr), and while it does not represent a new chemical class for us grape growers (succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor or SDHI) it is one of those 'new generation' SDHIs that Wayne spoke of last year. The SDHI fungicides belong to FRAC Group 7, which also includes chemistries in products like Endura and Pristine (boscalid) and Luna Experience (fluopyram). Aprovia was available for use in most states last year, but has now been labeled for use in New York as well. As a solo product, Aprovia is very effective for the control of powdery mildew as trials in NY over several years have shown.
    [Show full text]
  • NYSAES | Pubs | Press | Perrine 2000
    Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Home / News & Events / NYSAES News Releases Pictures are linked to hi-res scans EMBARGOED UNTIL JULY 10 Today's date: July 7, 2006 Contact: Linda McCandless, [email protected], wk 607-254-5137; cell 607-227-5920 Cornell Releases Three New Wine Grapes By Joe Ogrodnick ROCHESTER, NY: Cornell University officially named and released three new wine grapes during the 31st annual American Society for Enology and Viticulture/Eastern Section Conference and Symposium, held July 9-11 in Rochester, N.Y. The three new grapes-'Noiret'™, 'Corot noir'™ and 'Valvin Muscat'™-were developed and tested by Bruce Reisch, grape breeder and professor of horticultural sciences at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station in Geneva, N.Y., in cooperation with Thomas Henick-Kling, professor of enology at the Experiment Station and leader of Cornell's enology program. "All three grapes are broadly adapted to the wine growing regions in the East, and produce high quality varietal wines that are superior to those currently available to Eastern growers today," said Reisch. 'Corot noir'™, a mid- to late-season red wine 'Noiret'™ (pronounced "nwahr-ay"), a mid-season red wine grape, is a complex grape, is a complex interspecific hybrid resulting interspecific hybrid resulting from a cross made in 1973 between NY65.0467.08 and from a cross made in 1970 between Seyve Villard 'Steuben'. 18-307 and 'Steuben'. "'Noiret'™ represents a distinct improvement in the red wine varietal options available Credit: Bruce Reisch - NYSAES, Cornell University to cold-climate grape growers," said Reisch.
    [Show full text]
  • Powdery Mildew of Grapes
    report on RPD No. 773 PLANT December 2019 DEPARTMENT OF CROP SCIENCES DISEASE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN POWDERY MILDEW OF GRAPE Powdery mildew is caused by the fungus Uncinula necator. This fungus was reported in North America in 1834. Powdery mildew occurs in most grape growing areas of the world. If not managed effectively on susceptible cultivars, the disease can reduce vine growth, yield, quality, and winter hardiness. Cultivars of Vitis vinifera and its hybrids (French hybrids) are generally much more susceptible to powdery mildew than are native American cultivars such a Concord. Symptoms Uncinula necator can infect all green tissues of the grapevines. The fungus penetrate only epidermal cells, sending haustoria into them to absorb nutrients. Although haustoria are found only in epidermal cells, neighboring noninvaded cells may become necrotic. The presence of mycelia with conidiophores and conidia on the surface of the host tissue gives it a whitish gray, dusty or powdery appearance. Both surfaces of leaves of any age are susceptible to infection (Figure 1). _____________________________________________________________________________ For further information concerning diseases of small fruits, contact Dr. Mohammad Babadoost, Extension Specialist in Fruit and Vegetable Pathology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. University of Illinois Extension provides equal opportunities in programs and employment. - 2 - Young expanding leaves that are infected become distorted and stunted (Figure 2). Petioles and cluster stems are susceptible to infection throughout the growing season. Once infected, they become brittle and may break as the season progresses. When green shoots are infected, the affected tissues appear dark brown to black in feathery patches (Figure 3), which later appear reddish brown on the dormant canes.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Master Thesis Hungli Wang 071720.Pdf
    Choose an item. The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School CHARACTERIZATION OF MICROBIAL DYNAMICS AND VOLATILE METABOLOME CHANGES DURING FERMENTATION OF CHAMBOURCIN GRAPES IN TWO PENNSYLVANIA REGIONS A Thesis in Food Science by Hung Li Wang © 2020 Hung Li Wang Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2020 The thesis of THEHung LiPURDUE Wang was UNIVERSITY reviewed and approved GRADUATE by the following: SCHOOL Josephine Wee STATEMENT OF COMMITTEE APPROVAL Assistant Professor of Food Science Thesis Advisor Helene Hopfer Assistant Professor of Food Science Darrell W. Cockburn Assistant Professor of Food Science Robert F. Roberts Professor of Food Science Head of the Department of Food Science Approved by: Dr. ii ABSTRACT Numerous studies have indicated that the wine microbiome could generate various volatile compounds which could lead to distinguishing and different wine characteristics. However, little research regarding the wine microbiome is investigating specific microorganisms and their role within the entire microbial community under a more comprehensive sampling method. Thus, in this study we conducted direct sampling from Central and Northeast PA wineries instead of using lab-scale production to study the effect of the wine microbiome on the wine metabolome. Resulting grape and wine samples were characterized by next-generation sequencing and headspace-solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). Collectively, the innovative sampling and experimental techniques provided a high-resolution picture of microbial dynamics and the resulting wine volatile profiles. Overall, we illustrated how microbial diversity and relative abundance of specific microorganisms change as fermentation progressed. Also, various wine volatile metabolites that are formed during the different fermentation stages were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Cherry Leaf Spot
    CHERRY LEAF SPOT 695 maturely defoliated produced fewer blossoms the following year, the flowers were poorly developed and slower in opening, fewer cherries ripened, and the cherries were smaller. Many fruit spurs died, and the crop was greatly reduced on the spurs that survived. By reducing shoot growth and spur Cherry development, the defoliation lowered the yield for several years. Following the worst outbreak of Leaf Spot cherry leaf spot on record in the Cum- berland-Shenandoah Valley in 1945, thousands of sour cherry trees died and F. H. Lewis many others had severe injuries. In Virginia on trees defoliated in Cherry leaf spot, caused by the para- May and June of 1945, the average sitic fungus Coccomyces hiemalis^ is one of weight of the buds in late summer was the major factors that determine the 90 milligrams.' The buds on trees that cost of producing cherries and the had retained their foliage averaged 147 yield and quality of the fruit. milligrams in weight. The smaller buds The disease occurs on the sour did not have enough vitality to survive cherry, Prunus cerasus, sweet cherry, P, the winter. All unsprayed trees died. avium, and the mahaleb cherry, P, None of the trees died in one orchard mahaleb, wherever they are grown where sprays had delayed defoliation under conditions that favor the sur- 4 weeks or more. vival of the fungus. That includes our Heavy early defoliation in West Vir- eastern and central producing areas ginia in 1945 stimulated the produc- and the more humid areas in the West. tion of secondary growth on 64 percent Because it has been most serious on of the terminals about 2 weeks after sour cherry in the Eastern and Central harvest.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Grape Maturity at OSU Research Vineyards Imed Dami, Diane Kinney, Andy Kirk, Yvonne Woodworth, the Ohio State University
    OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER 2019 Grape Maturity at OSU Research Vineyards Imed Dami, Diane Kinney, Andy Kirk, Yvonne Woodworth, The Ohio State University. Thanks to the continuous interest by Ohio growers and vintners and support by the Ohio Grape Industries Committee, we are pleased to resume monitoring fruit maturity progression of varieties grown at the research vineyards during the 2019 season. This information will be sent weekly to OGEN subscribers and posted on the program website, Buckeye Appellation. The date of berry sampling and corresponding heat units or growing degree days (GDD) are included. Note that the GDD in your location could be higher or lower than that at our sites. For example, at the Wooster research vineyard, grape ripening of similar varieties is typically 1 to 2 weeks behind central and southern Ohio, and 1 to 2 weeks ahead of more northern latitude vineyards and on Lake Erie shores. To determine the GDD in your location, visit the OSU-GDD Calculator. To learn more about monitoring fruit maturity and berry sampling, please read OSU factsheet at the following link: Are your grapes ready to pick? Click here for Fruit maturity from previous years. We wish you bountiful and successful harvest!! rape maturity of grape varieties at the Wooster research vineyard: G (1) Sampling Date: 8/20/2019 (GDD=2138) 100 Harvest Variety Berry SS (%) pH T.A. (g/L) FMI Date wt (g) Chardonnay 136 15.2 2.93 16.9 9 Chambourcin 187 14.3 2.79 18.3 8 La Crescent 138 17.9 2.89 16.0 11 Marquette 144 18.3 2.90 16.1 11 Regent 169 17.0 3.20 13.3 13 Sauvignon blanc 139 17.5 2.94 16.8 10 *SS: soluble solids, which estimate sugar concentration in grape juice using a refractometer.
    [Show full text]
  • Wine-Grower-News #283 8-30-14
    Wine-Grower-News #283 8-30-14 Midwest Grape & Wine Industry Institute: http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Wine Information in this issue includes: Results of the 6th Annual Cold Climate Competition 8-31, Upper Mississippi Valley Grape Growers Field Day-Baldwin, IA Book Review - THE POWER OF VISUAL STORYTELLING Which States Sell Wine in Grocery Stores - infographic 9-10, Evening Vineyard Walk - Verona, WI 9-(13-14), Principles of Wine Sensory Evaluation – Brainerd, MN 9-27, 5th Annual Loess Hills Wine Festival – Council Bluffs Good Agricultural Practices: Workshops Set for Fall 2014, Spring 2015 10-30 to 11-1, American Wine Society National Conference – Concord, NC Neeto Keeno Show n Tell Videos of Interest Marketing Tidbits Notable Quotables Articles of Interest Calendar of Events th Results of the 6 Annual Cold Climate Competition The 2014 Annual Cold Climate Competition that was held in Minneapolis, MN. The judging involved 284 wines from 59 commercial wineries in 11 states. The 21 expert wine judges awarded 10 Double Gold, 23 Gold, 67 Silver and 80 Bronze medals at this year’s event. Check out the winners here: http://mgga.publishpath.com/Websites/mgga/images/Competition%20Images/2014ICCW CPressRelease_National.pdf Grape Harvest has started in Iowa. Remember to use the Iowa Wine Growers Association “Classifieds” to buy or sell grapes: http://iowawinegrowers.org/category/classifieds/ 1 8-31, Upper Mississippi Valley Grape Growers Field Day - Baldwin, IA When: 1 p.m. - 2:30 pm, Sunday, August 31, 2014 Where: Tabor Home Vineyards & Winery 3570 67th, Street Baldwin, IA 52207 Agenda: This field day covers a vineyard tour, a comparison and evaluation of the NE 2010 cultivars from the University of Minnesota & Cornell University and a chance to sample fresh grapes of the new cultivars and selections.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Classification of Vine Varieties Has Become Difficult to Understand Because of the Large Whereas Article 31
    31 . 12 . 81 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 381 / 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC) No 3800/81 of 16 December 1981 determining the classification of vine varieties THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Whereas Commission Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/ 70 ( 4), as last amended by Regulation ( EEC) No 591 /80 ( 5), sets out the classification of vine varieties ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Whereas the classification of vine varieties should be substantially altered for a large number of administrative units, on the basis of experience and of studies concerning suitability for cultivation; . Having regard to Council Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 of 5 February 1979 on the common organization of the Whereas the provisions of Regulation ( EEC) market in wine C1), as last amended by Regulation No 2005/70 have been amended several times since its ( EEC) No 3577/81 ( 2), and in particular Article 31 ( 4) thereof, adoption ; whereas the wording of the said Regulation has become difficult to understand because of the large number of amendments ; whereas account must be taken of the consolidation of Regulations ( EEC) No Whereas Article 31 of Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 816/70 ( 6) and ( EEC) No 1388/70 ( 7) in Regulations provides for the classification of vine varieties approved ( EEC) No 337/79 and ( EEC) No 347/79 ; whereas, in for cultivation in the Community ; whereas those vine view of this situation, Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/70 varieties
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Grapes in Missouri
    MS-29 June 2003 GrowingGrowing GrapesGrapes inin MissouriMissouri State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University-Mountain Grove Growing Grapes in Missouri Editors: Patrick Byers, et al. State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University Department of Fruit Science 9740 Red Spring Road Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711-2999 http://mtngrv.missouristate.edu/ The Authors John D. Avery Patrick L. Byers Susanne F. Howard Martin L. Kaps Laszlo G. Kovacs James F. Moore, Jr. Marilyn B. Odneal Wenping Qiu José L. Saenz Suzanne R. Teghtmeyer Howard G. Townsend Daniel E. Waldstein Manuscript Preparation and Layout Pamela A. Mayer The authors thank Sonny McMurtrey and Katie Gill, Missouri grape growers, for their critical reading of the manuscript. Cover photograph cv. Norton by Patrick Byers. The viticulture advisory program at the Missouri State University, Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center offers a wide range of services to Missouri grape growers. For further informa- tion or to arrange a consultation, contact the Viticulture Advisor at the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center, 9740 Red Spring Road, Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711- 2999; telephone 417.547.7508; or email the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center at [email protected]. Information is also available at the website http://www.mvec-usa.org Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 Considerations in Planning a Vineyard ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CHARDONEL – Still Wine Styles
    CHARDONEL – Still Wine Styles MEETING NOTICE The topic for our January meeting is "Chardonel Still Wine Styles". Fifty-nine wineries in Missouri produce wine using the Chardonel grape (1) , making it one of the most popular regional wines. Amateur wine makers in Missouri are fortunate that high quality Chardonel grapes are available from local vineyards. Steve Brunkhorst will lead the meeting, and will share his 2014 vintage Chardonel wines. We will taste his Chardonel produced in glass without flavor or aroma modification, and compare it to the same base wine produced with malolactic fermentation as well the same base wine aged with American oak. We will also taste Chardonel wines from several Missouri wineries. (1) apellationamerica.com CHARDONEL Still Wine Styles Missouri Winemaking Society January 21, 2016 Steve Brunkhorst CHARDONEL – Still Wine Styles Chardonel a cross of Seyval x Chardonnay in 1953. Fruit first observed 1958 Original vine propagated in 1960 Distinguished by superior wine quality combined with high productivity Cold hardiness superior to parent Chardonnay The 4th wine grape cultivar to be named by the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Cayuga White (1972) Horizon ( 1983) Melody (1986). SOURCE www.hort.cornell.edu CHARDONEL – Still Wine Styles “This hybrid grape is a cross of the famed Chardonnay grape with the popular Seyval Blanc. Chardonel can be fermented in oak or stainless steel barrels, and the grapes produce a dry and full bodied wine. Depending on aging techniques, this hybrid may exude notes
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Biological Peculiarities of Blumeriella Jaapii
    Plant Protection Science – 2002 Investigation of Biological Peculiarities of Blumeriella jaapii A. VALIUSHKAITE Plant Protection Laboratory, Lithuanian Institute of Horticulture, LT-4335 Babtai, Kaunas District, Lithuania E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Leaf spot pathogen is characterized as a highly developed parasite after investigation of development peculiarities of the fungus in pure culture and natural conditions. The degree of correlation depended on the medium. Impact of incubation temperature on Blumeriella jaapii (Rehm) Arx growth was different. Fungi colonies formed more intensively and their diameter increased significantly under higher temperature. Optimal conditions for the disease prevalence are 15–20°C and moisture. Relative humidity and precipitation influenced maturation of ascomycetes and discharge of ascospores (r = +0.89). Microscopic analysis of leaves showed that during winter thaw, when the average temperature is about 0 ± 5ºC and relative humidity is higher than 70%, was possible to detect mature ascomycetes and conidia. It is possible to affirm that lower temperature than it was assumed is sufficient for formation of ascomycetes. Keywords: Blumeriella jaapii; sour cherry; cherry leaf spot; medium, mycelium; growth speed; conditions INTRODUCTION expendient to investigate the biological peculiarities of Blumeriella jaapii. Cherry leaf spot, caused by Blumeriella jaapii (Rehm) Arx (syn. Coccomyces hiemlis Higg.), is a MATERIALS AND METHODS widespread disease of sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.). It is a major disease of sour cherries in North In 1996–1999 the fungus Blumeriella jaapii, a patho- America (SJULIN et al. 1989), and in Europe serious gen of sour cherry leaf spot, and the accompanying losses have been reported in Poland (BIELENIN et al.
    [Show full text]