DOCSLIB.ORG

(WDES) Consultation Response

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(WDES) Consultation Response High Speed 2 Working Draft Environmental Statement Consultation Response HS2 Phase 2B WDES Consultation Response Sheet i i | P a g e HS2 Phase 2B WDES Consultation Response Sheet ii Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 2. The Impact of the Proposed Scheme on Businesses .................................... 3 3. The Impacts of the Proposed Scheme on Residential Properties ................. 5 4. The Continuity of Highways Across the Proposed Route .............................. 6 5. The Impacts of the Proposed Scheme in the Clayton Area .......................... 7 6. Archaeology and Heritage Assets ................................................................. 9 7. Ecology and Biodiversity ............................................................................. 10 8. Landscape and Visual Impacts ................................................................... 12 9. Construction Traffic Routes ......................................................................... 13 10. Improvement of the A635 Corridor .............................................................. 14 Annex 1: Composite Issues Log ....................................................................... 15 Annex 2: Report of the Director of Public Health ii | P a g e HS2 Phase 2B WDES Consultation Response Sheet iii iii | P a g e HS2 Phase 2B WDES Consultation Response Sheet 1 HS2 WDES Consultation Response 1. Introduction Doncaster Council’s opposition to the Government’s Preferred Route for HS2 has already been well documented through its response to the Government’s consultation on the route in 2017. The Council’s position has not changed. However, the Council wants to work with the Government and HS2 Limited in whatever ways it can to secure the best outcomes for the Council, its residents and businesses, and also the wider region. To that end, the Council welcomes the opportunity to comment on the HS2 Working Draft Environmental Statement presented. Our response to the HS2 Consultation identifies the Council’s concerns with HS2 Limited’s design of the route through the Borough, its presentation of the impacts associated with the route and its suggested mitigation of those impacts. The Council’s response to the three consultation questions posed (see below) are all incorporated within this document. 1. What comments do you have on the information presented in the working draft Environmental Statement? 2. Do you have any suggestions about additional information or assessments that should be included in the Environmental Statement? 3. Do you have any other comments? Whilst the Council has done its best to respond to the Working Draft Environmental Statement [WDES] Consultation within the limited time available, this response should in no way be seen as either comprehensive, or as a final statement of the Council’s position. The Council welcomes continual meaningful engagement on the proposals over the coming months as the proposal develops to ensure that the impact of the proposal on people, places and valuable assets in Doncaster is minimised, and that opportunities are taken to enhance provision wherever possible. Having said this, the impact of the proposed Scheme in Doncaster is severe and for that impact and pain, Doncaster receives no benefit at all. The Council deplores the attempts in the WDES to underplay that impact; to be less than honest about the impacts to residents and businesses; and to economise on mitigation, for example with the closure of Red Hill Lane. 1 | P a g e HS2 Phase 2B WDES Consultation Response Sheet 2 The Council’s response identifies a series of headline issues in the main body of the report, but more detailed feedback, identifying a plethora of specific issues, is included in the Annexes. In light of the ever growing volume of information casting doubt on the HS2 project as a whole, the Council urges HS2 Limited and the Government to carry out an honest reappraisal of the scheme, and especially for the Eastern Leg of HS2 Phase 2B. This information includes: . Spiralling costs o National Audit Office report in 2016 about Phase1 being £204m over budget; o Infrastructure and Projects Authority widely publicised ‘secret’ report that costs may have increased by as much as 60%; o Alleged £2b cost overrun on property acquisition costs; o Incorrect assumptions in the modelling for HS2 Phase 2B where 8 train paths per hour are assumed between York and Newcastle, where there in fact are only 6 available unless £millions are spent on increasing rail capacity north of Northallerton. This cost is not included in HS2’s cost envelope, and yet HS2 is effectively claiming the benefit; o The estimated £825m cost of making Sheffield Midland and Chesterfield Stations HS2 ready – none of this money is included in HS2’s cost envelope. Increasing impacts on residential property with 137 reported demolitions in the WDES where only 35 demolitions were reported at Route Consultation Stage . Increasing impacts on employment with 170 job losses now estimated just on the Ravenfield to Clayton (LA13) section alone. Any one of these factors would trigger a review in the business case development of a major scheme because they would affect the scheme’s overall Benefit Cost Ratio. However, this process seems not to apply in the case of HS2. An urgent review is required to restore public confidence that the Proposed Scheme offers UK plc value for money. 2 | P a g e HS2 Phase 2B WDES Consultation Response Sheet 3 2. The Impact of the Route on Businesses The Council notes that in total for the section of the Proposed Scheme between Ravenfield and Clayton, there is an impact on an estimated 170 jobs (Para 12.4.15), either displaced or lost. The Council considers that these jobs are lost, being no clear rationale expressed in the WDES of how these jobs will be displaced citing only possible employment opportunities in the construction of the scheme. This assumes a skills match which may or may not be possible. 170 job losses in Doncaster is unacceptable, given that 8 of the 10 Business Units identified as being affected by the Proposed Scheme are located in areas of high deprivation. The WDES seriously underplays the impacts of the Proposed Scheme on businesses. Whilst the Council understands that Environmental Impact Assessments are carried out to a defined methodology to ensure comparability, it appears that HS2 Limited has used the methodology to mask some of the real impacts of the route on businesses within the Borough. Not only this, but the text does not follow its own rationale, is inconsistent, and gives a wholly misleading view. Figure 1: Impacts on Denaby Industrial Estate As an example, using the maps provided in Volume 2, the impact of the route on Denaby Industrial Estate in the permanent situation appears to affect just one ‘Business Unit’ (HS2 Limited terminology). In the temporary situation (ie during construction), the HS2 satellite compound located on the Estate requires the demolition of five ‘Business Units’. 3 | P a g e HS2 Phase 2B WDES Consultation Response Sheet 4 In the permanent situation, the Proposed Scheme actually directly affects two business premises on the Binder Industrial Estate, although this could be mitigated by the construction of retaining walls. In the temporary situation, there are not only 11 business premises affected in the Binder Industrial Estate, but also a multiple occupancy office/warehousing block (Denaby Point), United Carpets and a further premise between Denaby Point and Binder Industrial Estate (see Figure 1 above), giving a total of a minimum of 18 business premises. The WDES text states that there are “six units” affected on Denaby Industrial Estate (Para 12.4.9 and Table 31), and yet describes “Four businesses” experiencing direct impacts as a result of the Proposed Scheme (Para 12.4.14). This is clearly wrong, whether in the number of units affected, or in the number of businesses impacted, but it also underplays the real impact of the route which is that 5 business units are being demolished equating to a minimum of 18 business premises being directly affected. The associated loss of jobs is wholly unacceptable. The Council calls on HS2 Limited to locate its Satellite Construction Compound/Systems Compound elsewhere. There are similar issues relating to the Doncaster Road area where for example no temporary effects are described for businesses within The Croft eg Cock of the North Poultry, whose access off Pastures Court is wholly contained with the Consolidated Construction Boundary [CCB]. Barnburgh Lakes Fishery is identified as a business that would experience direct impacts as a result of the Proposed Route, being one of the four ‘resources’. However, such is the confusing terminology and inconsistency about what terminology is used in the WDES and where, Barnburgh Lakes Fishery is not listed in Table 31 as a resource “which would potentially experience significant direct effects”. It clearly will experience “significant direct effects”, as the business, which includes both the lakes and the café/shop will no longer be able to operate. Not taking account of the lakes element of the business as being an ‘agricultural route-wide effect’ is a nonsense. The business is the lakes, the café and the shop together, and the devastating effect on the entirety of this business needs to be at least acknowledged in the WDES. This underplaying of impacts similarly applies to the two identified businesses on
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dearne Valley Landscape Partnership Environmental and Biodiversity Review
    Dearne Valley Landscape Partnership Environmental and Biodiversity Review CONSULTATION VERSION 23rd October 2013 Prepared by Louise Hill MA, DipLD MRB Ecology and Environment 206 Thorne Road, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN2 5AF Tel 01302 322956 [email protected] www.mrbecology.co.uk 1 INTRODUCTION 3 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SOURCES Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Landscape Partnership Development Officer appointed Louise Hill of MRB Ecology and Environment to undertake a review of existing information on the An analysis of data availability was undertaken. In this initial task the type and supplier of data biodiversity of the Dearne Valley in order to prepare a strategy for achieving the environmental and available have been identified. These sources of data were identified from conversations and biodiversity aims of the Dearne Valley Landscape Partnership (DVLP). correspondence with a number of local biological record centre (LRC) staff, Yorkshire and the Humber Ecological Data Network (YHEDN) staff, Local Authority Biodiversity Officers and amateur The following key goals have been identified from Partnership documentation: naturalists and geologists. Additional information comes from experience of working as an ecologist in the South Yorkshire area for over 15 years and via the author's active role as President of one of 1) Protecting existing environmental assets – In a better condition the local amateur naturalist societies. Further information such as the format in which data are held and whether there are existing data-sharing agreements between the data provider and the DVLP 2) Maintaining existing environmental assets – Better managed has been provided, where known. 3) Improving Knowledge about Existing Assets - Better identified and recorded The results of this data availability review are presented in Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy 2014- 2028
    The Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy 2014- 2028 Creating a Greener, Healthier & more Attractive Borough Adoption Version April 2014 Doncaster Council Service Improvement & Policy (Regeneration & Environment) 0 1 the potential of the Limestone Valley, which runs through the west of the borough. Did you know that Doncaster has 65 different woodlands which cover an area in excess of 521 hectares? That’s about the equivalent to over 1,000 football pitches. There are 88 different formal open spaces across the borough, which include football, rugby and cricket pitches, greens, courts and athletics tracks. Doncaster is also home to 12 golf courses. The Trans-Pennine Trail passes through Doncaster and is integral to the extensive footpath and cycle network that link the borough’s communities with the countryside, jobs and recreation opportunities. There are so Foreword from the many more features across Doncaster and these are covered within this Strategy document. Portfolio Holder… Despite this enviable position that communities in Doncaster enjoy, there is always so much more that can be done to make the borough’s GI even greater. The Strategy sets out a framework As Portfolio Holder for Environment & Waste at for ensuring maximum investment and funding Doncaster Council, I am delighted to introduce is being channelled, both by the Council and the the Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy vast array of important partners who invest so 2014-2028: Creating a Greener, Healthier & much time and resources, often voluntarily, into more Attractive Borough. making our GI as good as it can be. As the largest metropolitan Borough in the This Strategy will help deliver a better country, covering over 220 square miles, connected network of multi-purpose spaces and Doncaster has an extensive green infrastructure provide the opportunity for the coordination (GI) network which includes numerous assets and delivery of environmental improvements and large areas that are rural in character.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    E k s r r C&AP* S o x localrenvironment agency plan SOUTH YORKSHIRE AND NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE AUGUST 1998 BEVERLEY LEEDS HULL WAKEFIELD ■ SH EFFIELD SOUTH YORKSHIRE AND NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE AREA ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES ( UAKEFIELD) M S r RIDING OF YORKSHIRE (KIRKLEES") BARNSLEY DOWCAST! ( DONCASTER ) ( ROTHERHAM ) < (DERBYSHIRE DALES') CHESTERFIELD !f ( BOLSOVER ) ---------CATCHMENT BOUNDARY RIVER ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARY MAIN ROAD NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 094859 KEY DETAILS General Water Quality: Length of watercourse(km) in each component of the Area 1849 knr General Quality Assessment (1996) Key Local Barnsley MBC j Authorities Chesterfield DC A Good 5.6 km Doncaster MBC B 133.2 km North East Derbyshire DC C Fair 179.6 km Rotherham MBC D 198.2 km Sheffield City Council E Poor 178.3 km F Bad 36.3 km Other Ixxral East Riding of Yorkshire Unclassified 53 km Authorities Bolsover KirkJees Selby Wakefield Pollution Prevention and Control Population 1.4 million Licensed Sites: Total 350 Landfill sites 95 Transfer stations 106 Scrapyards/vchical dismantlers 114 Civic amenity sites 22 1 Water Resources Treatment plants 8 Storage facilities 5 Average annual rainfall: Incinerators 1 Red mi res 1090mm South Emsall 644mm Facilities claiming exemption 778 (inc exempt scrapyards) Total licensed abstraction 210.2 million m3/year Registered waste carriers 1531 (South Yorkshire only) Mean river flow @ Doncaster Special waste movements 38 000 Summer 691 million (1 May 97 ■ 30 April 98) litres/day Consented Discharges to water: Winter 2419 million Sewage 967 litres/day Trade 331 Number of Abstraction 381 Licences: (Surface andGroundwater) E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y Flood Defence NATIONAL LIBRARY & Length of main river 271 km INFORMATION SERVICE Number of people and 20516 house property protected from equivalents NORTH EAST REGION flooding Tyneside House, Skinnerburn Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Tax Setting and Statutory Resolutions 2020/21 PDF 270 KB
    Report ____________________________________________________________________ To the Chair and Members of Date: 5th March 2020 Council COUNCIL TAX SETTING AND STATUTORY RESOLUTIONS 2020/21 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This report sets out how the Council Tax is calculated and makes recommendations regarding Doncaster’s Council Tax requirement for 2020/21. 2. It is proposed that Doncaster Council’s element of the Band D Council Tax charge is increased by 3.99% (1.99% Council Tax increase and a further 2.00% increase through the Government`s Social Care precept) to £1,405.35 (£936.90 for a Band A). 3. The overall increase will mean an additional £53.92 for Band D Council Tax per annum, £1.04 per week (£35.95 for Band A per annum, £0.69 per week). EXEMPT REPORT 4. Not applicable. RECOMMENDATIONS 5. Council is requested to approve a Band D Council Tax for 2020/21 of £1,405.35 for Doncaster Council services. Council is also requested to pass the appropriate Statutory Resolutions, as set out and recommended at Appendix B, which incorporate the Council Taxes of the Joint Authorities and which, taken together with Doncaster's 3.99% increase, represent a 3.66% increase from the 2019/20 Council Tax for Doncaster residents. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE CITIZENS OF DONCASTER? 6. The citizens of Doncaster can expect to see their Council Tax for Council services increase by 3.99%. The Police and Fire increases are 2.00% and 1.99% respectively, making an overall increase of 3.66% (see table at paragraph 22). 7. The average Parish Council Tax across the whole Doncaster Council area has increased by 3.11%.
    [Show full text]
  • South East Statistics, Charts and Maps Describing Wakefield's Area Working Areas
    InstantAtlas™ Server 6 Wakefield Seven Area Profile Selection: South East Statistics, charts and maps describing Wakefield's Area Working areas. Introduction A wide variety of social, economic and cultural conditions exist across the Wakefield district, and these combine to create a patchwork of distinctive communities and neighbourhoods. These differences may prompt agencies to deliver services in particular ways and the priorities for local people in one area may be different to those of people living in another area. The Wakefield Together area working model has been developed to reflect and address the differences that exist across the district. For the purposes of area working, the district is divided into seven areas: Castleford; Normanton and Featherstone; Pontefract and Knottingley; South East; Wakefield Central; Wakefield North West; and Wakefield Rural. Some of the seven areas also include ‘priority neighbourhoods’ where intelligence suggests that specific targeted support is required. There are 12 priority neighbourhoods in the district overall. The Council’s Performance and Intelligence Team, collaborating with partners, has developed a set of more detailed reports to focus on each of the seven areas in turn. This report focuses on the South East area. The aim of the report is to help people understand local conditions and the changes that occur over time. The report draws on both quantitative and qualitative information from a wide range of sources – both national and local. Profile created: 9/1/2017 Key Points Population Profile The proportion of people satisfied with their local area as a place to live has increased significantly recently. The age profile of the population is similar to the district average and has aged over the past 10 years - older people now make up a higher proportion of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennine Lower and Middle Coal Measures Formations of the Barnsley District
    The Pennine Lower and Middle Coal Measures formations of the Barnsley district Geology & Landscape Southern Britain Programme Internal Report IR/06/135 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY & LANDSCAPE SOUTHERN BRITAIN PROGRAMME INTERNAL REPORT IR/06/135 The Pennine Lower and Middle Coal Measures formations of the Barnsley district The National Grid and other R D Lake Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Editor Licence No: 100017897/2005. E Hough Keywords Pennine Lower Coal Measures Formation; Pennine Middle Coal Measures Formation; Barnsley; Pennines. Bibliographical reference R D LAKE & E HOUGH (EDITOR).. 2006. The Pennine Lower and Middle Coal Measures formations of the Barnsley district. British Geological Survey Internal Report,IR/06/135. 47pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. © NERC 2006. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2006 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available from the BGS British Geological Survey offices Sales Desks at Nottingham, Edinburgh and London; see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG The London Information Office also maintains a reference 0115-936 3241 Fax 0115-936 3488 collection of BGS publications including maps for consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Governing Body Papers 12 July 2016
    BOARD MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BODY TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, 12 JULY 2016 BOARDROOM, WHITE ROSE HOUSE AT 1.00 PM AGENDA PART 1 No. Agenda Item Lead officer 1. Welcome and Chair’s Opening Remarks 2. Apologies for Absence – Dr Deborah Hallott, Alison Sugarman, Michele Ezro, Karen Parkin 3. Public Questions and Answers 4. Declarations of interest All present 5. a Minutes of the meeting held on 10 May 2016 b Action sheet from the meeting held on 10 May 2016 6. Matters arising 7. Chief Officer Briefing Jo Webster 8. NHS Wakefield CCG 15/16 Annual Review and CCG Improvement and Pat Keane Assessment Framework 2016/17 9. Sustainability and Transformation Plan ‐ Presentation Pat Keane 10. Local Digital Roadmap Melanie Brown 11. NHS Wakefield CCG 360 Stakeholder Survey 2015 Pat Keane [Headlines, Achievements and Ambitions] 12. Integrated Quality and Performance Summary Report Andrew Pepper/Jo Pollard [Report measuring the quality and performance of local services] 13. Meeting the Challenge Implementation Verbal Update Pat Keane/Jo Pollard 14. 2016/17 Finance Report Month 2 Andrew Pepper 1 15. Receipt of minutes and items for approval a Audit Committee (i) Minutes of meeting held on 14 April (ii) Minutes of meeting held on 5 May 2016 b Integrated Governance Committee (i) Minutes of meeting held on 21 April 2016 (ii) Minutes of meeting held on 19 May 2016 c Clinical Cabinet (i) Minutes of meeting held on 28 April 2016 (ii) Minutes of meeting held on 9 June 2016 d Connecting Care Executive (i) Minutes of meeting held on 14 April 2016 (ii) Minutes of meeting held on 12 May 2016 e Probity Committee (i) Minutes of meeting held on 21 April 2016 f Health and Well Being Board (i) Minutes of meeting held on 24 March 2016 g Decisions of the Chief Officer – verbal update 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Otc Medicines Independent Report Prepared by Standout Media Limited for South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw Ics
    OTC MEDICINES INDEPENDENT REPORT PREPARED BY STANDOUT MEDIA LIMITED FOR SOUTH YORKSHIRE AND BASSETLAW ICS DECEMBER 2018 2 OTC MEDICINES INDEPENDENT REPORT Contents Introduction and purpose 3 About the South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw area and its population 4 Who was involved? 5 About the insight and engagement campaign 6 Who were our target audiences? 7 Methodology 7 Toolkits 9 About the people who engaged with us 11 Patient and public survey 14 What did the patients and public tell us? 16 Staff engagement 19 Community engagement 21 Social media 22 Website statistics 24 How our insight campaign compares 26 What we propose – next steps 27 Awards 29 Appendices Appendix 1 – SYB ICS partner organisations 30 Appendix 2 – Rotherham CCG Start Well, Choose Well, Stay Well campaign assets 32 Appendix 3 – SYB ICS Citizens’ Panel 33 Appendix 4 – Patient and public survey results in graphs 34 Appendix 5 – Prescriber survey results in graphs 41 Appendix 6 – Doncaster prescriber survey results 45 Appendix 7 – Barnsley consultation report 67 Appendix 8 – GP practices by CCG area 89 Appendix 9 – Community pharmacies by CCG area 95 Appendix 10 – Parish councils by CCG area 105 Appendix 11 – Libraries by CCG area 107 Appendix 12 – Community centres by CCG area 109 Appendix 13 – ONS data by CCG area 112 Appendix 14 – MPs by CCG area 117 Appendix 15 – Comms toolkit 118 3 OTC MEDICINES INDEPENDENT REPORT Introduction and purpose In early 2018 NHS England carried out a public consultation on reducing prescribing of over the counter (OTC) medicines for minor, short-term health concerns which could save the NHS high costs and encourage more people to self-care.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalist 1092 Text + Centre Pages
    August 2016 Volume 141 Number 1092 Yorkshire Union Yorkshire Union The Naturalist Vol. 141 No. 1092 August 2016 Contents Page The shrinking violet Viola stagnina in the Thorne area of Yorkshire I. McDonald 81 The Bloody-nosed Beetle Timarcha tenebricosa in North Yorkshire: distribution 87 and estimates of population size* Geoff S. Oxford, Roma H. Oxford and Simon Warwick Note on ship-based sightings of Cetaceans off the Yorkshire coast John Perry 96 The genus Campsicnemus in Yorkshire Roy Crossley 99 More dots on the map: further records of leafmining moths in East Yorkshire 101 Andy D. Nunn and Barry Warrington Yorkshire Ichneumons: Part 5 W.A.Ely 104 Field Note: Vagrant Emperor in Hessle Barry Warrington 120 The phenomenon of urban peat formation* Graeme T. Swindles, Andrew 121 Jones and Garry Rushworth Woodlands of the Ormesby to Wilton areas, N.E. Yorkshire: some observations 127 on their terrestrial molluscs and flora* A.A. Wardhaugh Fundraising campaign to create new pollinator-friendly habitat in York Alice 134 Farr The formation and early years of organized natural history in Hebden Bridge, 137 Yorkshire, and the influence of William Nowell (1880 -1968) R. A. Baker John Frank Raw, naturalist, and his significance today Anthony Raw 144 YNU Membership Survey – results and next steps Paula Lightfoot, Andy Millard 150 and Barry Warrington YNU Calendar 2016 160 Notices: YNU Annual General Meeting p120 Scarborough Museum Exhibition p119 Opportunities at the Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union p159 An asterisk* indicates a peer-reviewed paper Front cover: Adult Bloody-nosed Beetle Timarcha tenebricosa (see pp87-95). Photo: Geoff Oxford Back cover: Volunteers and local residents planting wild flowers at Millennium Bridge, a flagship ‘buzzing site’ for York Urban Buzz (see pp134-136).
    [Show full text]
  • HS2 Ltd Have Advised the Department That, Should the Government Decide to Adopt This Route, the Entire Shimmer Development Should Be Within the Safeguarded Area
    New HS2 plans for South Yorkshire Frequently Asked Questions Why can’t you move the alignment to avoid the Shimmer housing development? The design requirements of a high speed railway restrict what can be achieved in alignment and curvature. A change in one location can have implications for many kilometres at either side of that point. There are a number of considerations in this area including the residential areas of Mexborough, Denaby Main and Conisbrough as well as the new housing estates in Mexborough. The Dearne Valley has a number of wetlands such as Denaby Ings that have Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) status. There are also other obstacles such as a sewage treatment works. Moving the route to the east to avoid the Shimmer development would increase the impact on numerous businesses in Denaby Main industrial estate, impact the new housing estate Melton View on Pasture Lane and bring the route closer to Denaby Ings SSSI. Routes further to the east, (east of Conisbrough) would be longer crossing several SSS1’s, woodlands and flood plains. Routes to the west of Mexborough would run through the river Dearne floodplain for long distances and require tunnels to pass through the hillier ground. Should the government decide to adopt the route, the consultation proposed will allow HS2 to better understand the constraints and impacts of the route and allow the opportunity for the route to be further refined as appropriate. What happens next? The Secretary of State will set out his plans for Phase 2b of HS2 later this year, including his preferences on the location of the HS2 route and station in South Yorkshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Dearne Valley Eco-Vision Final Report.Pdf
    DEARNE VALLEY ECO-VISION “Perhaps we cannot raise the winds. But each of us can put up a sail, so that when the wind comes we can catch it.” E.F.Schumacher ‘The future of the Dearne Valley will be re-imagined by an eco-vision. The vision is of a place transformed by the know-how of its people and by the imagination and commitment of its communities and enterprises. It will be a place defined by action, in the knowledge that time is running out for the status quo. Within a decade it will be the lowest carbon community of its kind in the country. A pioneer proud to tell its story and share its experiences. Using its distinct resources, assets and potential as a foundation, the Dearne will build a lean, green economy in preparation for the challenges that lie ahead. But above all the eco-vision will rekindle the work ethic of the Dearne’s forefathers, providing a renewed sense of purpose and inspiration for the next generation.’ Published May 009 Sheffield City Region The Source 00 Meadowhall Way Sheffield S9 EA Tel: 0 6 5685 Email: [email protected] Web: www.sheffieldcityregion.org.uk The Dearne Valley eco-vision was commissioned by the Dearne Valley Special Board, one of the Sheffield City Region’s five thematic working groups. The eco-vision was produced by Nick Dodd, Jonathan Brown and John Sampson from URBED, with support from Richard Hindley, Nick Gardner and Joanne Parkin at SQW, and Jonathan Turner and Sarah Bull from DTZ. The authors wish to acknowledge the support of Joanne Wehrle from Rotherham Council, Martin Cantor from Barnsley Council and Stuart Jenkinson from the Environment Agency, as well as members of the Dearne Valley Officers Group and other key consultees (see Chapter 8 for a listing), in developing the eco-vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Doncaster Cycling Map
    6 A 6 N V T O 4 W 3 E B Bentley Moor E A R N H 2 E 8 L O Wood N R M E 2 C TH OA R D A OR D M N L IN W E I D E V S A N P L I V E BO E L EADO F T N IV O A M W IE S U R R N F H E E D T E H F V E L U R BE T E AR I Dunscroft M A R S L O UM EN O LO M L W V N O W C PA A NT A UTTERW R E RK G O L E N Y ORT T R W E Barnby Dun O R AV H UT U S Adwick D U D O A T EN L B Y R B U R AD A E M E WIC S IV A E K LA Common V T E C T NE E F N T A 9 H E U H V C PO 1 E S E A H N E C E R A AVE D I GTON I K T ENNIN R YN IN O K C L N U GSLE A I Y V Adwick Pk E T R E E B V L O N N D A A A A U LA Jun Sch A W D O C E K E L R K Barnby Dun Frickley OOD N E A R U V B E L W A A R T A E N E E S R E V T N A S N N A Common H V E R E C E H A Park Hill N U T A N F T A B D Playing Fields O SB U IN W D U E Almholme Hooton R Y SW Outwood IC A Grange AVENUE ADWICK K R 49 50 51 52 53 W54 55 56 57 Shaftholme 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 L M Town and country maps with hundreds of miles of routes E A A N Academy S N E T E N Grumble Hurst H Pagnell R H LA O I A O G N L R B LE STREET L M R G I OO P L S O T V O North Ridge L O E S O L R L E CLAYT U LAN V N A NE AN L ON L ALK H LA E E A ANE N GE B Community E R TPT SHAFT ME G PO ID E N HOL H C N R D R C D N O Q C E A E L E E A E Lound Hill L L X R S U E N A School T O S U K R RT E N 'S O D N L O T N M D G E A N O E A A S E B N ECT R V R Plantation R E O O N V S L V R ND U O O U L O R O A R A I I Toll Bar R E T A N L A V R O D ENT N M L R T A ESC D Almholme Field I E I G E A V R E D A EW E E O E C N V V T D IV E D I V I T G N S E E R R Prim Sch
    [Show full text]