Part Ten: the Qajars- from Muhammad Khan to Muzarffar Al
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PART TEN THn aAlARs: FRoM MuHAMMAD KgAN To MuaAFFAR AL-DrN SrraH (IT94-1907 c.n.) CHnprBn T rn'ENTY Fall of the Cradle of Freedom Innx-which in the shining age of Cyrus the Great had promulgated the first proclamation of freedom in the world-after going through a period of ups and downs, reached the point where it had been transformed into a dark cavern of contumacy and selfishness; its pride became its shame. During the Qajar period, human rights in Iran took a precipitous dive. The various forms of torture which were adopted are indicative of the bloodthirstiness of the rulers of the day. Ary courageous, dynamic statesman like Qa'im Maqam Farahani or Amir Kabir who sought the prosperity of Iran was sentenced to death. The pseudo-mullahs, with their erroneous inter- pretations of divine law, considered themselves absolute rulers. In towns and villages, each established his own absolute power base. Apart from the few great, distinguished clerics who put an end to this corrupt system, the country was in the hands of pseudo-mullahs who vied with the Qajars in tyranny, and in order to bring the kings under their sway, they observed no distinction between religion and politics. During this period, the clerics divided the Muslim population of Iran into two groups: mujtaftids and muqallids. A mujtahid was a person versed in Shi'ijurisprudence, and a muqallidwas any person who was not a mujtahld. Kings and governors were also classified according to this simple taxonomy: as they were not mujtahids, they had to be muqalfids and obey the fatwas (religious edicts) of the mujtahids. This seemingly simple principle held true in affairs of state, and the state was not to take any action without the consent of the religious scholars. In other words, the tyranny of the Qajar period was dual. While the people were under the command of the oppressive Qajar kings, the kings themselves were to obey the clerics. The oppressive governors and the even more oppressive kings dared not contradict the wishes of their domestic overlords. 368 COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY OF THE JEWS OF IRAN The dimensions of tyranny expanded in many ways. The Qajar period was a re-enactment of the sectarian Safavid period-minus the captivating faqade and grand architecture. The cultural, artistic, literary and architectural achievements of the Qajar period were accomplished by Iranian patriots who escaped the punishment of the Qajars: During the Qajar dynasty, unsavory incidents occurred which resulted in the weakening of the country, the loss of some of its territories, the exercise of foreign influence, and the undermining of Iranian independence. (Razi, p.478) Agha Muhammad Khan Qajar (rZg+-tzg7),the founder of the Qajar dynasty, set the precedent for the spilling of innocent Iranian blood by the kings of this dynasty. While this bloodthirsty man was fighting Lutf 'Ali Khan Zand for the throne, five years had already passed since the great French Revolution of L789 and the destruction of the bastion of tyranny. Agha Muhammad Khan-who in an earlier conflict had been castrated by 'Adil Shah Afshar and forever deprived of sexual gratification-upon seizing the chalice of power, filled it to the brim with human blood, and like an intoxicating wine, it stupefied him. In his ultimate battle with Lutf 'Ali Khan, the Zand king fled to Kerman. Agha Muhammad Khan marched on Kerman. He was met by soldiers loyal to the house of Zand outside the city gates. It took him four months to capture the city. After seizing Kerman, Agha Muhammad Khan ordered the de- struction of the city, a massacre, and the chastisement of the populace. He ordered that 20,ooo pairs of eyes should be gouged out from amongst the local inhabitants and delivered to him. Such damage was inflicted upon the city by him and his soldiers as cannot be described bY words. Agha Muhammad Khan gouged out the eyes of Lutf 'Ali Khan, the young and handsome eldest son of the House of Zand. .and ordered that Lutf 'Ali Khan be put to death. (Iqbal, Tarikh-e lran, pp.76r-62) FALL OF THE CRADLE OF FREEDOM 369 The standard-bearer of the Qajar dynasty granted the women of Kerman to his soldiers and took the children captive. Whenin ry96 he proclaimed himself king in Tehran, he ordered that the bones of Karim Khan Zand be disinterred and reburied in front of his palace so he could tread upon them daily. Agha Muhammad Khan even showed his brothers no mercy, blinding one and putting the other to death. In the first year of his reign, he marched on Mashhad and took Nadir's grandson, Shahrokh, prisoner. He placed bread dough upon the head of the blind old governor and then poured molten lead on the dough to make him reveal where the Afsharid family jewels were hidden. This hard-hearted king employed the same murderous methods in his attack on Tiflis. In his bloodletting, he made no distinction between Muslim and non-Muslim. He spared no effort in the looting of the city and the massacre of its inhabitants. He destroyed churches, cast priests bound hand and foot into the water, and took boys and girls captive.'75 The advances made by Karim Khan Zand toward the people's prosperity and the expansion of commerce were undone during the oppressive reign of Agha Muhammad. Colonizers had a free hand in Iran in these days, and in the name of the "expansion of trade," the English made insidious encroachments in the Persian Gulf to secure the sea route for the East India Company. Agha Muhammad-the personification of murder, plunder, and arson, a man not above committing any crime in his struggle for the throne-was killed at the age of 6l by two persons whom he had sentenced to death. During the reign of Fath 'Ali Shah Qaja. Q797-rg4), the effects of this dynasty's black rule over the nation gradually became appar- ent. The state's depleted treasury led Iran to become dependent upon foreigners, who looked upon the country with an avaricious eye and vied with one another for direct influence in Iran's foreign and domestic affairs. Napoleon Bonaparte-who came to power '75Razi, p. 484. 370 COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY OF THE JEWS OF IRAN during this period and was the archrival of an expansionist En- gland-conceived a plan to attack India by way of Iran and to seize that country, which was for practical purposes an English possession. Whereas the Russians, too, had begun encroaching upon Iran by occupying Georgia, the French emperor sent an envoy to the Iranian king with a message stating that were he to ally himself with France and not hinder the passage of a French army through Iran en route to India, then France would reciprocally help to put the Russians in their proper place by organizinga modern army in lran. The king agreed, and preliminary measures were taken. French military advisors reorganized the Iranian army and brought new cannon and other weapons to the country. England was agitated by this treaty and appointed Sir John Malcolm-a veteran states- man-to the English embassy in Iran. He offered to contribute f tzo,ooo a year to support the king's campaign against the Russians in return for his refusal to allow the French to attack India from Iranian soil. Iran had plainly become a sphere of influence for the great European powers. Iran accepted the English offer, but England had extended a hand of friendship to Russia in its war with Napoleon and forgot its "aid payment." The Russians attacked lran. 'Abbas Mirza, the crown prince, was unable to do anything about it, and in the same year in which the Europeans formed an alliance against Napoleon, "the Treaty of Golestan was concluded between Iran and Russia with English backing.""u England had pinned the naive Qajars' backs to the ground through trickery and deception. The Russians, exploiting the government's weakness, attacked Iran once more and this time permanently detached another portion of Iranian territory through the Treaty of Turkomanchay. Under the terms of this truly shameful treaty, Iran ceded Georgia, the Caucasus, Yerevan, Nakhichevan and part of Azerbaijan to Russia. Iran paid Russia ro million gold tomans in war reparations and lost the right to sail on the Caspian Sea. In return, Russia officially '7Razi, p. 4go. FALL OF THE CRADLE OF FREEDOM 371 recognized 'Abbas Mirza as the Iranian crown prince! These treaties made Iran weak and vulnerable in its foreign policy. Witn the defeat of Napoleon, two great foreign powers-England and Russia-vied for influence in Iran. Russian agents were able to enter Iran without any restrictions. The Russians from the north and the English from the south ate away like termites at the dry-rotted foundations of Iranian freedom and independence. Iran had in effect become a colony, and any talk of its independence is unfounded. How can one speak of independence when disputes between Ira- nian and Russian nationals had to be resolved at the Russian consu- 'Ali late? At the same time, the number of wives in Fath Shah's seraglio reached I57:he was unsurpassed in his pursuit of merriment and diversion. This number is not exaggerated. The author of l/aseklr al-tavarikh, which records the history of the Qajar dynasty, lists the names of each of this lecherous king's women. Muhammad Shah Qajar (1834-1848) was powerless before the cler- ics. Mirza Abu al-Qasim Qa'im Maqam-a man of letters and a skilled statesman who intended to implement reforms in Iran and made important strides toward the betterment of the country-be- came the object of the king s scorn through the intrigues of rumor- mongers and was put to death at his command.