Template for Two-Page Abstracts in Word 97 (PC)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Template for Two-Page Abstracts in Word 97 (PC) SAMPLE CURATION AT A LUNAR OUTPOST. C. C. Allen 1, G. E. Lofgren1, A. H. Treiman2, and M. L. Lindstrom3 1NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058 USA [email protected] [email protected] 2Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, TX 77058 USA [email protected] 3NASA Headquarters, Washing- ton, DC 20546 USA [email protected] Introduction: The six Apollo surface missions re- particularly iron-rich pyroclastic glass and ilmenite- turned 2,196 individual rock and soil samples, with a bearing material. Ice-rich deposits have been pre- total mass of 381.6 kg [1]. Samples were collected dicted in permanently-shadowed locations, and the based on visual examination by the astronauts and con- verification of such deposits is an import goal for lunar sultation with geologists in the science “back room” in exploration. Other volatiles, derived from volcanic Houston. The samples were photographed during col- emissions or implanted by the solar wind, may also lection, packaged in uniquely-identified containers, prove valuable resources. and transported to the Lunar Module. All samples Lunar Outpost Curation Studies: Concepts for collected on the Moon were returned to Earth. the collection of samples at lunar outposts were stud- NASA’s upcoming return to the Moon will be dif- ied intensively in the years following Apollo. The ferent. Astronauts will have extended stays at an out- 1988 “Geoscience at a Lunar Base” workshop [2] care- post and will collect more samples than they will re- fully considered the curation and analysis of samples turn. They will need curation and analysis facilities on on the Moon’s surface. The workshop participants the Moon in order to carefully select samples for return envisioned a complete curatorial facility at a lunar to Earth. base, similar in concept to the facility at JSC, but on a Apollo Sample Curation: The Apollo samples smaller scale. Sample handling and analysis would be are curated at the NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) done outside the habitat, in a dust-controlled structure, in Houston, TX. To minimize contamination, the using robotic and telerobotic operation as much as samples are stored in dry, high-purity nitrogen glove- possible. boxes within class 1,000 cleanrooms. Only a limited The 1989 Lunar Science Strategy Workshop [3] set of materials is allowed to contact the samples. The represented the input of the science community to lunar samples are distributed worldwide to support NASA’s 90-Day Study. The workshop report recom- peer-reviewed research, as well as education and pub- mended that a lunar outpost should have a sample cu- lic outreach. ration facility, at ambient lunar surface conditions, Curation of lunar samples can be divided into dis- robotically operated and complemented by a prelimi- tinct, but interconnected, functions: nary examination laboratory. The most detailed scheme for handling and cura- Documentation and tracking tion of geoglic samples on the Moon is included in the Handling and subdivision “First Lunar Outpost Mission” (FLO) study conducted Preliminary examination at JSC. Treiman [4] compiled specific recommenda- Contamination and environmental control tions for sample documentation and tracking, handling Secure storage and subdivision, preliminary examination, contamina- Allocation tion and environmental control, and continued storage on the Moon. The samples returned by the Apollo astronauts are the most intensively-analyzed rocks and soils in his- Lunar Outpost (2007): The current draft of tory. Sample analysis in the decades following Apollo NASA’s Lunar Architecture [5, 6] envisions the pro- established the current understanding of lunar geology gressive build-up of a crewed outpost, commencing and clearly demonstrated where continuing research in with the first human mission. Crews on early mis- needed. New generations of scientists, new classes of sions will occupy the outpost for days or weeks, and analytical instruments, and new insights have resulted the long-term goal is continual occupation supported in continuing demand for theses samples, even 35+ by crew rotations every several months. years after their return. The outpost will likely be located at or near one of Samples also provide the raw material for future the lunar poles. The discovery and analysis of vola- utilization of lunar resources. Oxygen, for life support tiles in permanently-shadowed polar craters is one of and propulsion, is a resource of high interest. Oxygen the high-priority science goals of this architecture. can be derived from oxide minerals in the lunar soil, Sample Curation at a Lunar Polar Outpost: contaminating events and environments must be Sample return to Earth is an essential part of the cur- documented. rent Architecture. However, mission restrictions on mass and volume will undoubtedly constrain the num- Storage must ensure that the samples receive mini- ber of returned samples to considerably less than the mal contamination and alteration. This implies number of samples collected. The samples transported storage remote from the habitat, other human op- to Earth will need to be carefully selected to address erations, landing areas, and flight paths. specific, high-priority research questions. Other sam- ples may be studied on the Moon, particularly if the Adequate safeguards must be used to prevent hu- aspects to be studied would be compromised by expo- man health hazards and equipment damage from sure to the spacecraft or the terrestrial environment. lunar dust. The design of the spacecraft that will return crews and samples from the lunar outpost to Earth has not The following practices for handling and curation been finalized. However, preliminary planning in- of rocks, rake samples, and soil samples are rec- cludes a mass allocation of 200 kg for samples, includ- ommended: ing packaging. This compares to the total 110.5 kg of rock and soil (without packaging) returned by Apollo o Upon collection a geological sample should 17 following three extravehicular activity traverses. be split into subsamples for preliminary ex- Clearly the Apollo-era practice of transporting all col- amination at the lunar outpost, detailed analy- lected samples to Earth will have to be modified, and a ses on Earth, and minimally contaminated method of hi-grading samples at the lunar outpost will storage on the Moon. be required. o Storage at the lunar outpost should ensure that Sample contamination at a lunar outpost is poten- samples receive minimal contamination, and tially a much larger problem than it was during the be readily retrievable. Apollo missions. The amount of infrastructure and o Preliminary examination of the designated off-gassing associated with the outpost, as well as the sub-samples may take place in a geosciences repeated landing and liftoff of rockets, can seriously laboratory space in the outpost. contaminate unprotected samples. o Samples expected to contain volatiles should The potential health hazard posed by lunar dust, as be maintained at subfreezing temperatures un- well as the hazard to equipment posed by this highly til they are either analyzed at the outpost or abrasive material, will significantly affect outpost de- transported at subfreezing temperatures to sign and operation. These concerns present a strong Earth. argument for conducting curation activities outside of o The decision to transport a sample to Earth the habitable volume of the outpost. should be based in large part on preliminary The basic recommendations of the previous studies examination. remain valid for the curation of rock and soil samples o Samples collected but not selected for trans- collected at most locations on the Moon. However, as port to Earth should be curated on the Moon, Treiman [4] noted, these schemes are “inadequate for under conditions of minimal contamination or curation and handling of volatile-rich materials, such alteration. as might be found at the lunar poles.” In order to ef- fectively study polar volatiles, the samples must be References: [1] Heiken G. H. et al. (1991) Lunar maintained cold until they are analyzed. This will re- Sourcebook, Cambridge University Press. [2] Taylor G. J. quire either the ability to extract the volatiles on the and Spudis P. D. (1990) Geoscience at a Lunar Base, Con- Moon or the ability to transport the samples in a frozen ference Publication 3070, NASA, Washington, DC. [3] condition to Earth. Duke M. B. (1989) Lunar Science Strategy Workshop, Cura- Based on these considerations, specific to the lunar tor’s Data Center, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX. [4] polar outpost baselined in the current Architecture, the Treiman A. H. (1993) Curation of Geological Materials at a recommendations of the previous studies are modified: Lunar Outpost, Report JSC-26194, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX. [5] NASA (2005) Exploration Systems Archi- All geological samples must be completely docu- tecture Study, NASA-TM-2005-214062, NASA, Washing- mented and tracked. ton, DC. [6] NASA (2006) NASA Unveils Global Explora- tion Strategy and Lunar Architecture, Contamination of geological samples must be lim- http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/dec/HQ_06361_ES ited according to potential uses, and all potential MD_Lunar_Architecture.html .
Recommended publications
  • Domi Inter Astra
    Team members Alice Sueko Müller | Anshoo Mehra | Chaitnya Chopra | Ekaterina Seltikova Isabel Alonso Serrano | James Xie | Jay Kamdar | Julie Pradel | Kunal Kulkarni Matej Poliaček | Myles Harris | Nitya Jagadam | Richal Abhang | Ruvimbo Samanga | Sagarika Rao Valluri Sanket Kalambe | Sejal Budholiya | Selene Cannelli Space Generation Advisory Council Team 1 Contents Society and Culture 3 Tourist Attractions 3 Astronaut and Tourist Selection 3 Architecture 4 Module 1: Greenhouse, Guest Amenities, Medicine, and Environmental Control 5 Module 2: Social Space and Greenhouse 5 Module 3: Kitchen, Fitness, Hygiene, and Social 6 Module 3: Sky-view 6 Module 4: Crew Bedrooms and Private Social Space 6 Module 5: Workspace 6 Management and Politics 7 Governance, Ownership, and Intellectual Property 7 Crew Operations 7 Base Management System 8 Safety & Emergency Planning 8 Engineering 9 Landing & Settlement Site 9 Settlement Structure 10 Robotics and Extravehicular Activities (EVAs) 10 Construction Timeline 11 Communications System 12 Critical Life Support (Air & Water) Systems 12 Thermal System 13 Food & Human Waste Recycling 14 Other Waste 14 Technical Floor Plan 14 Power Generation & Storage 14 Economy 16 Capital & Operating Costs 16 Revenue Generation 17 Tourism & Outreach 17 Commercial Activities 18 Lunar Manufacturing 18 References 20 ntariksha, aptly meaning ‘the universe’ in to be a giant leap for all the young girls around the Sanskrit, is an avid stargazer fascinated world, and she knew something incredible is waiting by the blanket of splurging stars she saw to be known. from her village in North East India. To- day, her joy knew no bounds upon learn- “Each civilization must become space-faring or ex- ingA that she would get a chance to visit Domi Inter tinct”.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Horizon Report
    Volume I · SUMMARY AND SUPPORTING CONSIDERATIONS UNITED STATES · ARMY CRD/I ( S) Proposal t c• Establish a Lunar Outpost (C) Chief of Ordnance ·cRD 20 Mar 1 95 9 1. (U) Reference letter to Chief of Ordnance from Chief of Research and Devel opment, subject as above. 2. (C) Subsequent t o approval by t he Chief of Staff of reference, repre­ sentatives of the Army Ballistic ~tissiles Agency indicat e d that supplementar y guidance would· be r equired concerning the scope of the preliminary investigation s pecified in the reference. In particular these r epresentatives requested guidance concerning the source of funds required to conduct the investigation. 3. (S) I envision expeditious development o! the proposal to establish a lunar outpost to be of critical innportance t o the p. S . Army of the future. This eva luation i s appar ently shar ed by the Chief of Staff in view of his expeditious a pproval and enthusiastic endorsement of initiation of the study. Therefore, the detail to be covered by the investigation and the subs equent plan should be as com­ plete a s is feas ible in the tin1e limits a llowed and within the funds currently a vailable within t he office of t he Chief of Ordnance. I n this time of limited budget , additional monies are unavailable. Current. programs have been scrutinized r igidly and identifiable "fat'' trimmed awa y. Thus high study costs are prohibitive at this time , 4. (C) I leave it to your discretion t o determine the source and the amount of money to be devoted to this purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Lunar and Planetary Base Architectures
    Space 2003 AIAA 2003-6280 23 - 25 September 2003, Long Beach, California Mobile Lunar and Planetary Bases Marc M. Cohen, Arch.D. Advanced Projects Branch, Mail Stop 244-14, NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 TEL 650 604-0068 FAX 650 604-0673 [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper presents a review of design concepts over three decades for developing mobile lunar and planetary bases. The idea of the mobile base addresses several key challenges for extraterrestrial surface bases. These challenges include moving the landed assets a safe distance away from the landing zone; deploying and assembling the base remotely by automation and robotics; moving the base from one location of scientific or technical interest to another; and providing sufficient redundancy, reliability and safety for crew roving expeditions. The objective of the mobile base is to make the best use of the landed resources by moving them to where they will be most useful to support the crew, carry out exploration and conduct research. This review covers a range of surface mobility concepts that address the mobility issue in a variety of ways. These concepts include the Rockwell Lunar Sortie Vehicle (1971), Cintala’s Lunar Traverse caravan, 1984, First Lunar Outpost (1992), Frassanito’s Lunar Rover Base (1993), Thangavelu’s Nomad Explorer (1993), Kozlov and Shevchenko’s Mobile Lunar Base (1995), and the most recent evolution, John Mankins’ “Habot” (2000-present). The review compares the several mobile base approaches, then focuses on the Habot approach as the most germane to current and future exploration plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending NASA™S Exploration Systems Architecture Towards Long
    SpaceOps 2006 Conference AIAA 2006-5746 Extending NASA’s Exploration Systems Architecture towards Long - term Crewed Moon and Mars Operations Wilfried K. Hofstetter *, Paul D. Wooster †, Edward F. Crawley ‡ Massac husetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue , Cambridge, MA, 02139 This pape r presents a baseline strategy for extending lunar crew transportation system operations as outlined in NASA’s Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS) report towards longer -stay lunar surface operations and conjunction class Mars missions. The analys is of options for commonality between initial lunar sortie operations and later Moon and Mars exploration missions is essential for reducing life -cycle cost and pr oviding low - investment / high -return options for extending exploration capabilities soon afte r the 7 th human lunar landing . The analysis is also intended to inform the development of the human lunar lander and other exploration system elements by identifying enabling requirements for extension of the lunar crew tr ansportation system. The baseline strategy outlined in this paper was generated using a three -step process : the analysis of exploration objectives and scenarios, identification of functional and operational extension options , and the conceptual design of a set of preferred extension option s. Extension options include (but are not limited to) the use of the human lunar lander as outpost for extended stays, and Mars crew transportation using evolved Crew Exploration Vehicle ( CEV ) and human lander crew compartments. Although t he results presen ted in this paper are based on the ES AS elements , the conclusions drawn in this paper are generally applicable provided the same l unar transportation mode (lunar orbit rendezvous) is used .
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Lunar Architecture
    4. Lunar Architecture 4.1 Summary and Recommendations As defined by the Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS), the lunar architecture is a combination of the lunar “mission mode,” the assignment of functionality to flight elements, and the definition of the activities to be performed on the lunar surface. The trade space for the lunar “mission mode,” or approach to performing the crewed lunar missions, was limited to the cislunar space and Earth-orbital staging locations, the lunar surface activities duration and location, and the lunar abort/return strategies. The lunar mission mode analysis is detailed in Section 4.2, Lunar Mission Mode. Surface activities, including those performed on sortie- and outpost-duration missions, are detailed in Section 4.3, Lunar Surface Activities, along with a discussion of the deployment of the outpost itself. The mission mode analysis was built around a matrix of lunar- and Earth-staging nodes. Lunar-staging locations initially considered included the Earth-Moon L1 libration point, Low Lunar Orbit (LLO), and the lunar surface. Earth-orbital staging locations considered included due-east Low Earth Orbits (LEOs), higher-inclination International Space Station (ISS) orbits, and raised apogee High Earth Orbits (HEOs). Cases that lack staging nodes (i.e., “direct” missions) in space and at Earth were also considered. This study addressed lunar surface duration and location variables (including latitude, longi- tude, and surface stay-time) and made an effort to preserve the option for full global landing site access. Abort strategies were also considered from the lunar vicinity. “Anytime return” from the lunar surface is a desirable option that was analyzed along with options for orbital and surface loiter.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Architecture Analysis
    Lunar Architecture Analysis Ed Crawley Massachusetts Institute of Technology February 25 th , 2009 Thanks to: Bruce Cameron, Theo Seher, Bill Simmons, Arthur Guest, Wilfried Hofstetter , Ryan Boas USCC Programmatic Workshop on NASA LSS Concepts © Ed Crawley Motivation for a Great Architecture • Architecture is design at the system level • We have before us the design of an unprecedented system to explore the solar system • The system must meet the differing and changing needs of many stakeholders • The system must be flexible, easily integrated, and have life-cycle affordability QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. • This is what sustainable and well architected systems do! USCC Programmatic Workshop on NASA LSS Concepts © Ed Crawley System Architecture • Architecture • The allocation of physical/informational function to elements of form , and definition of relationships* among the elements. Cost $$$ • Consists of: Form • Function • Related by Concept • To Form Benefit Function Concept • Establishes value equation * often, but not always defined by interfaces USCC Programmatic Workshop on NASA LSS Concepts © Ed Crawley Why is System Architecture Important? • Primary link between benefit and cost! • High leverage on an organization’s activities • Selection consumes a relatively small portion of an organization’s efforts, yet decision dictates majority of work. • Architecting can provide: • Cross project commonality and extensibility • Good interface control • Creative new solutions • Source
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Outpost the Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon Erik Seedhouse Lunar Outpost the Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon
    Lunar Outpost The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon Erik Seedhouse Lunar Outpost The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon Published in association with Praxis Publishing Chichester, UK Dr Erik Seedhouse, F.B.I.S., As.M.A. Milton Ontario Canada SPRINGER±PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION SUBJECT ADVISORY EDITOR: John Mason, M.Sc., B.Sc., Ph.D. ISBN 978-0-387-09746-6 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Springer is part of Springer-Science + Business Media (springer.com) Library of Congress Control Number: 2008934751 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. # Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2009 Printed in Germany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a speci®c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: Jim Wilkie Project management: Originator Publishing Services, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK Printed on acid-free paper Contents Preface ............................................. xiii Acknowledgments ...................................... xvii About the author....................................... xix List of ®gures ........................................ xxi List of tables ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minimum Functionality Lunar Habitation Element
    Minimum Functionality Lunar Habitation Element by The University of Maryland Space Systems Laboratory Dr. David L. Akin Massimiliano Di Capua Adam D. Mirvis Omar W. Medina William Cannan Kevin Davis July 2009 ABSTRACT Title: MINIMUM FUNCTIONALITY LUNAR HABITATION ELEMENT Dr. David L. Akin, Massimiliano Di Capua, Adam D. Mirvis, Omar W. Medina, William Cannan, Kevin Davis University of Maryland - Space Systems Laboratory February 2009 NASA’s vision for the future of space exploration includes the establishment of a permanent human presence on the Moon through the Constellation program. Under the auspices of the NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate, the University of Mary- land Space Systems Laboratory has investigated, through literature reviews, a survey, and rigorous statistical methods, the definition of Minimal Functionality Habitation Element for medium duration lunar missions. By deploying a survey and making use of the Analyt- ical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) methods, the study team determined a list of functions and their relative importance, as well as their impact on systems design/implementation. Based on the past literature and the survey results, four habitat concepts were proposed, focusing on interior space layout and prelim- inary systems sizing. Those concepts were then evaluated for habitability through virtual reality (VR) techniques and merged into a single design. Trade studies were conducted and the final design was defined. A full-scale functional mockup of the final concept was also implemented to enable more realistic human factors studies and to validate the VR techniques used previously. This study was funded by the NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate (ESMD).
    [Show full text]
  • LPSC XXIV 983 the Purpose of the Artemis Program Is to Gather Vital Scientific and Engineering Data by Conducting Robotic Explor
    LPSC XXIV 983 OPPORTUNITY FOR EARLY SCIENCE RETURN BY THE ARTEMIS PRO6RAM " Charles Meyer, SN2, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston TX The purpose of the Artemis Program is to gather vital scientific and engineering data by conducting robotic exploration missions on the lunar surface both prior to and concurrent with human missions. The Artemis Program includes rapid, near-term development of a variety of small experimental and operational payloads, a low-cost capacity to deliver these payload to any location on the lunar surface, and the analysis of the data returned. The Artemis Program will provide opportunities to improve the understanding of lunar geosciences, to demonstrate the Moon's unique capacity as an astronomical platform to study the universe, to conduct scientific and technology development experiments, and to prepare for and complement human missions. "Human beings have never yet put their footprints on a new land and then turned back, never to return." [ 1] However, the return to the lunar surface should include a partnership of robots and humans working together [2]. Robotic missions should explore numerous places on the Moon based on site selection using data collected by lunar polar orbiters and Earth-based telescopic observation. Rovers should be used to reconnoiter the landing area and paths to be followed by human explorers. Once a site for a lunar base is selected, rovers should be used to extend the reach and capability of astronauts. Multi-spectral imaging systems and various analytical instruments on rovers will allow close-up observations of outcrops and preliminary selection of important samples to be returned to Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Annual Meeting of LEAG-ICEUM-SRR (2008) V
    Program and Abstracts LPI Contribution No. 1446 Joint Annual Meeting of LEAG-ICEUM-SRR October 28–31, 2008 Cape Canaveral, Florida SPONSORED BY Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Lunar Exploration Analysis Group International Lunar Exploration Working Group Space Resources Roundtable CONVENERS Clive Neal, University of Notre Dame Steve Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Bernard Foing, European Space Agency, International Lunar Exploration Working Group Leslie Gertsch, Missouri University of Science and Technology Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Contribution No. 1446 Compiled in 2008 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Lunar and Planetary Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under a cooperative agreement with the Science Mission Directorate of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this volume are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. Abstracts in this volume may be cited as Author A. B. (2008) Title of abstract. In Joint Annual Meeting of LEAG-ILEWG-SRR, p. XX. LPI Contribution No. 1446, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. This volume is distributed by ORDER DEPARTMENT Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113, USA Phone: 281-486-2172 Fax: 281-486-2186 E-mail: [email protected] A limited number of copies are available for the cost of shipping and handling.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Lunar Architecture
    4. Lunar Architecture 4.1 Summary and Recommendations As defined by the Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS), the lunar architecture is a combination of the lunar “mission mode,” the assignment of functionality to flight elements, and the definition of the activities to be performed on the lunar surface. The trade space for the lunar “mission mode,” or approach to performing the crewed lunar missions, was limited to the cislunar space and Earth-orbital staging locations, the lunar surface activities duration and location, and the lunar abort/return strategies. The lunar mission mode analysis is detailed in Section 4.2, Lunar Mission Mode. Surface activities, including those performed on sortie- and outpost-duration missions, are detailed in Section 4.3, Lunar Surface Activities, along with a discussion of the deployment of the outpost itself. The mission mode analysis was built around a matrix of lunar- and Earth-staging nodes. Lunar-staging locations initially considered included the Earth-Moon L1 libration point, Low Lunar Orbit (LLO), and the lunar surface. Earth-orbital staging locations considered included due-east Low Earth Orbits (LEOs), higher-inclination International Space Station (ISS) orbits, and raised apogee High Earth Orbits (HEOs). Cases that lack staging nodes (i.e., “direct” missions) in space and at Earth were also considered. This study addressed lunar surface duration and location variables (including latitude, longi- tude, and surface stay-time) and made an effort to preserve the option for full global landing site access. Abort strategies were also considered from the lunar vicinity. “Anytime return” from the lunar surface is a desirable option that was analyzed along with options for orbital and surface loiter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Budgetary Implications of NASA's Current Plans for Space Exploration
    A CBO REPORT The Budgetary Implications of NASA’s Current Plans for Space Exploration April 2009 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE SECOND AND D STREETS, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515 ALTAIR LUNAR LANDER ORION CREW EXPLORATION VEHICLE Earth Departure Stage Upper Stage First Stage Core Stage ARES 1 ARES 5 Source: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (February 2008). Pub No. 3197 A CBO REPORT The Budgetary Implications of NASA’s Current Plans for Space Exploration April 2009 The Congress of the United States O Congressional Budget Office Notes Numbers in the text and tables may not add up to totals because of rounding. Unless otherwise noted, dollar amounts in this report are 2009 dollars of budget authority. Preface In response to a directive in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authori- zation Act of 2008, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has updated its 2004 report ana- lyzing the budgetary implications of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA’s) vision for the nation’s space exploration program. On the basis of NASA’s current estimates of costs, this report considers the effects that cost growth could have on the Constel- lation program, which will produce the agency’s new generation of spacecraft designed for human spaceflight, and updates comparisons of the costs for that program with those for the Apollo program and past proposals for human exploration of the moon. Kevin Eveker of CBO’s National Security Division prepared the report under the supervision of J. Michael Gilmore. Leigh Angres of the Budget Analysis Division assisted with preparation of the cost estimates under the supervision of Kim Cawley.
    [Show full text]