Waitakere 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Waitakere 2006 SAFE COMMUNITY RE-DESIGNATION APPLICATION Introducing Our Waitakere 2006 Safe Community Re-designation 2 2006 Application Message from the Mayor Our communities face increasingly difficult challenges in addressing safety issues for their citizens. As our world becomes more complex it is important our local communities explore and implement ways to make our city a safer place for all. The World Health Organisation’s Safe Community Network provides a framework for health and safety promotion as well as injury prevention. As New Zealand’s first city to be awarded WHO Safe Community accreditation, Waitakere has always been committed to improving safety for individuals, children and families. In 1993 we adopted the United Nations “First Call For Children” strategy and we are mindful of this commitment in all of our council agenda. Our WHO accreditation has provided a greater focus on what needs to be done and what can be done to achieve a safer quality of life and it gives us a benchmark to reflect on how we are delivering the safe community principles; signalling direction of developments and measuring our progress. Council is in the process of developing an action plan with the aim of declaring Waitakere a “City For Peace.” We believe adopting the principles of peace can provide a perspective towards helping our region to become a safer, more peaceful place. This complements the progress being made by Safe Waitakere and the Wellbeing process. It is through partnerships between Waitakere City Council, our local communities and government agencies that we strive to make Waitakere such a great place to live. This collaboration fosters a shared commitment to finding new and innovative approaches to make our region a safer place to live and work. While there still remains much to be done, we see identifying, planning and implementing safety initiatives as part of our commitment here in Waitakere. I am greatly troubled by the indications and statistics on what is happening in New Zealand but I am optimistic that by working together with the range of agencies we can look towards a more positive and safe future. Bob Harvey QSO, JP Mayor Safe Community Re-designation 3 2006 Application Safe Community Re-designation 4 2006 Application TABLE OF CONTENTS Message From The Mayor...............................................................................3 Waitakere - New Zealand’s Eco City for Sustainable Living ............................8 FROM THE BEGINNING- The SAFE WAITAKERE story ............................9 Policy FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................9 WAITAKERE ECO CITY ..............................................................................9 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES..........................................................................10 First Call for Children ..............................................................................11 Safe City .................................................................................................11 LONG TERM COUNCIL COMMUNITY PLAN............................................11 Strong Communities ...............................................................................12 Active Democracy...................................................................................12 PARTNERS IN SAFETY ............................................................................12 Maori.......................................................................................................12 Pacific Islands.........................................................................................13 New Ethnic Communities........................................................................13 Central Government Agencies................................................................13 Waitakere Community Sector .................................................................13 WELLBEING COLLABORATION PROJECT .............................................14 NATIONAL POLICIES................................................................................14 Safe Waitakere- The Team Grows .............................................................15 SAFE WAITAKERE INJURY PREVENTION 18 Fall-Safe Kids.............................................................................................18 General description.................................................................................18 Three phases of the campaign: ..............................................................19 Project activity included: .........................................................................20 Fall-Safe Strategic Plans and linkages with National Plans....................21 Governance arrangements .....................................................................21 Partner organisations..............................................................................21 Funding...................................................................................................22 Staffing....................................................................................................22 The Rock Fisher Project.............................................................................22 Strategic Plans and linkages with National Plans ...................................23 Populations targeted...............................................................................23 Governance arrangements .....................................................................23 Partner organisations..............................................................................24 Staffing....................................................................................................24 Funding...................................................................................................24 Results/evaluation ..................................................................................24 COMMUNITY ACTION ON YOUTH & DRUGS 25 Strategic Plans and linkages with National Plans.......................................25 National Drug Policy ...............................................................................25 Populations targeted...............................................................................26 Governance arrangements .....................................................................26 Partner organisations..............................................................................27 Staffing....................................................................................................27 Results/evaluation ..................................................................................28 Summary of main projects..........................................................................28 Current projects ......................................................................................28 Safe Community Re-designation 5 2006 Application Planned Projects.....................................................................................30 KEY PROJECTS ........................................................................................31 Aims and objectives................................................................................31 An Award Winning Project ......................................................................31 Target Audience .....................................................................................31 Partner organisations..............................................................................31 Evaluation...............................................................................................32 METHAMPHETAMINE CITY-WIDE EDUCATION PROGRAMME ............32 Aims and objectives................................................................................32 Populations targeted...............................................................................33 Governance arrangements .....................................................................33 Partner organisations..............................................................................33 Funding...................................................................................................33 Youth Assist (Year 2) .................................................................................33 Aims and objectives................................................................................33 Populations targeted...............................................................................33 Partner organisations..............................................................................34 Evaluation...............................................................................................34 YOUTH ASSIST Live Evaluation 19TH JUNE 06, Waitakere Trust Stadium ................................................................................................................34 CRIME PREVENTION PORTFOLIO 36 Crime Prevention Reference Group (CPRG)..............................................36 Assisting Council to set the Strategic Direction:......................................36 Partnership: ............................................................................................37 Membership/Composition: ......................................................................37 ................................................................................................................37 Waitakere Crime Prevention activity includes:............................................38 Graffiti
Recommended publications
  • Waitakere City Council Annual Report 2008/2009
    Waitakere08 City Council Annual Report Including Sustainability Reporting 20 09 08This is Waitakere City Council’s Annual Report, including the Sustainability Report 20 2 Introduction // About the Annual Report and Sustainability 09 Contents SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING ACTIVITY STATEMENTS About the City 4 City Promotion 115 From the Mayor 7 Democracy and Governance 117 Report from the Chief Executive Officer 9 Emergency Management 119 Planning and Reporting Cycle 12 West Wave Aquatic Centre 122 How the Eco City has Developed 13 Arts and Culture 124 Stakeholders 15 Cemetery 129 Sustainability Challenges 18 Leisure 132 Community Outcomes and Strategic Direction 22 Libraries 135 Parks 139 QUADRUPLE BOTTOM LINE Housing for Older Adults 143 Social 28 City Heritage 145 Cultural 34 Transport and Roads 147 Economic 38 Animal Welfare 151 Environmental 48 Vehicle Testing Station 153 Awards Received 62 Consents, Compliance and Enforcement 155 GOVERNANCE Waste Management 159 Role and Structure of Waitakere City Council 64 Stormwater 163 Council Controlled Organisations 82 Wastewater 167 Statement of Compliance and Responsibility 98 Water Supply 171 COST OF SERVICES STATEMENTS BY Support and Planning 175 STRATEGIC PLATFORM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Urban and Rural Villages 100 Income Statement 181 Integrated Transport and Communication 103 Statement of Changes in Equity 182 Strong Innovative Economy 104 Balance Sheet 183 Strong Communities 105 Statement of Cash flows 185 Active Democracy 107 Statement of Accounting Policies 187 Green Network 108 Notes to
    [Show full text]
  • 31 Mar 2020 Organisation Category Requested Declined Approval
    Grants Declined for the period 1 Oct 2019 - 31 Mar 2020 Organisation Category Requested Declined Approval Reason Ashburton Toy Library Inc Community $3,017.00 $3,017.00 Fully Declined 8 Drury Youth Charitable Trust Community $3,166.67 $3,166.67 Fully Declined 1 Waitakere City BMX Club Sport $2,627.38 $2,627.38 Fully Declined 8 Te Ha Ora The Asthma and Respiratory Foundation Charitable Trust Community $4,575.00 $4,575.00 Fully Declined 8 Auckland Basketball Services Ltd Sport $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Fully Declined 8 LU Combined Sports Assn Inc Sport $8,750.00 $8,750.00 Fully Declined 2 Home and Family Society Christchurch Branch Inc Community $15,809.95 $15,809.95 Fully Declined 2 Western Suburbs Soccer Club Inc Sport $7,200.30 $7,200.30 Fully Declined 8 Parent to Parent New Zealand Inc Wellington Community $9,750.00 $9,750.00 Fully Declined 8 Karekare Surf Life Saving Patrol Inc Community $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Fully Declined 8 Paralympics New Zealand Inc Sport $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Fully Declined 8 Suburbs New Lynn Cricket Club Sport $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Fully Declined 8 One Tree Point Bowling Club Inc Sport $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Fully Declined 8 Touch Canterbury Inc Sport $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Fully Declined 8 Croatian Cultural Society of New Zealand Inc Community $59,000.00 $59,000.00 Fully Declined 8 Rosehill College Education $12,643.54 $12,643.54 Fully Declined 3 NZ Barok Inc Community $1,300.00 $1,300.00 Fully Declined 8 Mamau Aotearoa Inc Sport $4,540.00 $4,540.00 Fully Declined 11 Seabrook McKenzie Trust for Specific Learning Disabilities
    [Show full text]
  • Dune Management at Piha Review and Proposed Management Plan
    Dune Management at Piha Review and Proposed Management Plan Prepared for Auckland Council Prepared by: J Dahm, Eco Nomos Ltd September 2013 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 PURPOSE OF REVIEW ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 AREA RELEVANT TO THIS REVIEW ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 WORK UNDERTAKEN ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. COASTAL PROCESSES AND SHORELINE TRENDS ............................................................................................. 5 2.1 DESCRIPTION AND COASTAL SETTING .................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 SHORELINE TRENDS AT PIHA BEACH OVER THE LAST 70-80 YEARS .............................................................................. 6 2.3 LIKELY FUTURE SHORELINE TRENDS AT PIHA ........................................................................................................... 9 2.4 IMPLICATIONS OF ONGOING SHORELINE ADVANCE FOR PIHA BEACH ......................................................................... 10 2.5 CAN THE SHORELINE ADVANCE BE STOPPED BY
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Council District Plan (Waitakere Section)
    This section updated October 2013 ACT means the Resource Management Act 1991, including amendments ACTIVE EDGE means that uses have a visual connection with the street level (usually from a ground floor) and entrances from the street. It will involve a degree of glazing but does not need to be fully glazed. The design should simply imply to users on the street that there is regular proximity and interaction between them and people within buildings. ADEQUATE FENCE (Swanson Structure Plan Area only) means a fence that, as to its nature, condition, and state of repair, is reasonably satisfactory for the purpose that it serves or is intended to serve. ADJOINING SITE(S) means the site or sites immediately abutting 1% AEP - 1% ANNUAL EXCEEDANCE PROBABLITY FLOOD LEVEL means the flood level resulting from a flood event that has an estimated probability of occurrence of 1% in any one year AIR DISCHARGE DEVICE means the point (or area) at which air and air borne pollutants are discharged from an activity excluding motor vehicles. Examples of air discharge devices Definitions include, but are not limited to a chimney, flue, fan, methods to provide evidence relating to the history roof vents, biofilters, treatment ponds, air of New Zealand conditioning unit and forced ventilation unit. ARTICULATION/ARTICULATED ALIGNMENT means vertical or horizontal elevation means the design and detailing of a wall or building facade to introduce variety, interest, a sense of AMENITY quality, and the avoidance of long blank walls. means those natural or physical qualities
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport for the Waitakere Ranges Residents' Survey
    Public Transport for the Waitakere Ranges Residents’ Survey - Summary Report Prepared by Buzz Channel and Auckland Transport September 2017 Waitākere Ranges Public Transport Survey – Summary Report Page 1 of 69 Executive summary Auckland Transport and the Waitakere Ranges Local Board have been investigating what Public Transport services may be needed in the Waitakere Ranges area. In March/April 2016, Auckland Transport held a survey for residents of the following areas: French Bay, Henderson Valley, Huia, KareKare, Konini (Kaurilands Rd, Daffodil St, Konini Rd), Laingholm, Oratia, Parau, Paturoa Bay, Piha, South Titirangi, Te Henga (Bethells Beach), Waiatarua, Wood Bay and Woodlands Park. These areas were targeted because they either have no current public transport service, have limited service, or were having services removed when the new West Auckland bus network was implemented in June 2017. Participation In total 839 feedback forms were received. The areas with the highest participation were Huia/Cornwallis/Parau with 116 residents from this area responding, followed by Wood Bay/French Bay/Paturoa Bay/South Titirangi with 108 respondents, and thirdly Piha with 101 respondents. Initial findings In order to determine if there is sufficient demand for any new services, data was grouped by potential routes; i.e. feedback from people who lived in the same area and whose chosen destinations could be accommodated by the same route, was analysed together. In most cases the numbers of people who said they would use each of these potential routes, and how often they said they would use them, was not sufficient to operate a viable bus service. However, two possible scheduled services were identified which could be viable and would warrant further investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Report Formatted
    Corporate Responsibility Report 2008/09 From the Chairman This Corporate Responsibility Report is being released at a time of global economic turmoil. New Zealand is not immune from the pressures that are buffeting world markets and national economies. It is salutary to consider that the causes of our present difficulties derive in large part from unwise investments in the housing sector in the USA. It is also noteworthy that many governments around the world have put in place infrastructure investment packages designed to stimulate a rapid recovery from recession. Many of these are environmental enhancement and new housing projects. For our part, the Board of the Hobsonville Land Company is delighted that we have the final go-ahead from our Government for the Hobsonville Point development. The investment in creating a new town of 3000 houses will provide a real stimulus for the regional economy in the years ahead. This is a greenfields project, one where we start from scratch and design a new town. It is a big job and our Board has been committed from day one to applying best practice in urban design to maximise the quality of the finished product. We have a fantastic site with great natural attributes and we are determined to create a living and working environment with high amenities and a cohesive community. Our commitment to best practice includes applying modern environmental principles within the overall spending cap. We have looked carefully at stormwater management and how that can be integrated into the landscaping of the site. We are ensuring that houses are warm, comfortable and healthy by considering solar orientation and including high levels of insulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Community to Hospital Shuttle Service
    Is other transport assistance Total Mobility Scheme available? The Total Mobility Scheme is a subsidised taxi Best Care for Everyone Yes, there are several options available to those service. The scheme is available to people who qualify. who are unable to use public transport due to the nature of their disability. It works using vouchers that give a 50% discount on normal National Travel Assistance (NTA) Policy taxi fares. The scheme is part-funded by the NTA helps with travel costs for people who New Zealand Transport Agency and managed need to travel often or for long distances to get by the local authorities. to specialist health or disability services. The MAXX Contact Centre can provide the To receive this service, you need to be referred contact details for disability agencies that by your specialist (not your family doctor) to process applications. Call 09 366 6400 see another specialist or to receive specialist services. Both the specialists must be part of a St John Health Shuttle - Waitakere service funded by the government. The St John Health Shuttle provides safe, For example, this could be a renal dialysis reliable transport for Waitakere City residents centre, a specialist cancer service or a child to and from appointments with family doctors, development service. The rules are different treatment at Waitakere Hospital outpatient for children and adults, and for those holding clinics, visits to specialists, and transport to a Community Services Card. Sometimes, a and from minor day surgery. The vehicle is support person can receive assistance too. wheelchair accessible. The service operates Monday to Friday for appointments between How do I contact NTA? 9.30am and 2pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Greening the City: Bringing Biodiversity Back Into the Urban Environment, P. 48-70
    Section 2: Nature Friendly Environments — Communities Making it Happen Waitakere’s Green Network, a 10-year anniversary — the challenges and successes of implementing a biodiversity programme begun in 1993 Chris Ferkins1 Waitakere City Council Private Bag 93-109, Henderson, Waitakere City, New Zealand [email protected] ABSTRACT In 1993 Waitakere City Council joined a group of some 2000 cities world-wide in taking the path to becoming sustainable cities — a direction that considers the impact our decisions today have on future generations and on the environment the city inhabits; a direction recommended to communities world- wide by The Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, through Agenda 21. When Waitakere City agreed to these recommendations they became the fi rst city in New Zealand to begin realigning to a sustainable objective. The eco city was born and a concept called the Green Network was developed. The Green Network is not just about enhancing biodiversity, but is a ‘healthy habitat for a city’ concept. The key element besides biodiversity is ecosystem services, and both have capacity to enhance the healthy functioning of biological and physical processes, to the benefi t of all living things within the city environment. Waitakere City faces similar challenges to the retention of biological diversity as other large New Zealand cities including land use intensifi cation, the spread of environmentally invasive weeds and the loss of vegetation and habitat. Waitakere however, has also retained signifi cant biodiversity helped by the mix of features that give variety to the landscape including coast, ranges (a large and recovering area of rainforest if somewhat frayed at the edges and in the vicinity of roadways), lowlands (containing fragmented remnant bush and wetland areas) and streams (retaining perhaps surprising levels of biodiversity).
    [Show full text]
  • Waitakere City Council Presentation to the Auckland Regional Growth Forum on the Future of Whenuapai the Importance of Whenuapai Airport to Waitakere City
    Waitakere City Council Presentation to the Auckland Regional Growth Forum on the Future of Whenuapai The Importance of Whenuapai Airport to Waitakere City • Civil use of Whenuapai is now Waitakere City’s most important long term development issue – Economic benefits – Transport benefits – City benefits • Live – Work – Play – “Plan B” is a lot worse What Are The Alternatives? • Ongoing use as an Airport • A Public Work • Rural Residential Sites • Waitakere City Council has rights under section 50 of the Public Works Act – The real alternatives are a public work and/or an Airport Whenuapai Area Direct Economic Impact • Defence closure – NZIER calculation (unchallenged) • $250m annual loss to Auckland’s northwest sector • $230m loss to Waitakere City. – 1647 jobs will be lost. 826 families – 2.3% of Waitakere’s GDP – 135% of Council’s total budget • Civil Airport by far the best replacement – BERL analysis – Other concepts are pie in the sky Indirect Economic Impact Auckland Region People Capacity 2050 • North-West Auckland is 70 60 New Zealand’s fastest 50 40 growing population 30 20 10 0 Northern Growth Auckland City Southern Zone Index Region Auckland 2001 = 100 Zone Population 2001 Population Capacity 2050 • 60% of Waitakere Auckland Region People Patterns 2001 and 50% North 60 Shore workers 50 40 leave daily for work 30 20 10 % of Region of Total % 0 Northern Zone Auckland City Southern Zone Population Employment Why Waitakere Wants Whenuapai Developed As A Civil Airport • Economic 9 Local Job Creation 9 Economic Stimulation 9 Supports the development of planned employment areas • Transport 9 Reduced road congestion. $341million gain / no cost 9 More efficent use of exisiting network 9 Improved airport access for >50% Aucklanders 9 Local employment = less travel "Travel time is worth a week's holiday every two months," said Alasdair Thompson, EMA's chief executive.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Ttcf Grants 1 April 2013 - 31 March 2014
    APPROVED TTCF GRANTS 1 APRIL 2013 - 31 MARCH 2014 NORTHLAND Stakeout Bar & Grill Age Concern Whangarei Inc $ 11,935.00 Alzheimers Society Northland Inc $ 5,000.00 Amputee Society of Auckland & Northland Inc $ 18,000.00 City Cricket Club $ 8,000.00 Deaf Aotearoa NZ Inc - Northland Branch $ 10,000.00 Epilepsy Assn New Zealand - Northland $ 2,000.00 F C Whangarei $ 847.00 Hapitia Nga Rangatahi Inc $ 2,000.00 Hurupaki Primary School $ 4,000.00 Kartsport Whangarei Inc $ 1,000.00 Lifeline Aotearoa Northland Branch $ 3,000.00 Maungakaramea Hockey Club $ 1,320.00 Maungatapere School $ 6,500.00 Nga Morehu Whanau Trust $ 2,000.00 North Haven Hospice $ 2,000.00 Northland Astronomical Society Inc $ 3,000.00 Northland Disabled Charitable Trust (T/A Forget Me Not Adult Day Centre) $ 2,625.00 Northland Junior Cricket Incorporated $ 2,068.00 Northland Multiple Sclerosis Society Inc $ 3,022.00 Northland Squash Racquets Assn Inc $ 440.00 One Tree Point Bowling Club Inc $ 1,500.00 Onerahi Soccer Club Inc $ 5,000.00 Otaika Valley School $ 1,000.00 Outward Bound Trust of New Zealand $ 6,600.00 Parent to Parent Northland $ 4,560.00 Parua Bay School $ 8,000.00 Regent Community Trust $ 2,391.00 Ruakaka Surf Life Saving Patrol Inc $ 2,801.00 SANZ Kamo Scout Group $ 5,000.00 Sherwood Park Golf Club Inc $ 1,000.00 Special Olympics Whangarei $ 2,304.00 Sport Northland $ 2,000.00 St John's Progressive Childcare Centre Inc $ 2,000.00 Tauraroa Area School $ 2,000.00 Tennis Northland Incorporated $ 5,000.00 The Northland Golf Club Inc $ 3,378.00 The Order of St John - Northern Region Trust Board $ 4,250.00 Tikipunga Association Football Club $ 2,270.00 Waipu Cove Surf Lifesaving Club $ 5,000.00 Whangarei Amateur Swimming Club Inc $ 15,000.00 Whangarei Anglican Care Trust $ 1,938.00 Whangarei Citizens Advice Bureau $ 639.00 Whangarei Junior Rugby Management Board Inc $ 6,882.00 Less Refunds Received -$3,773.84 $ 175,496.16 AUCKLAND Chances Sports Bar, Glenfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Regional Parks Management Plan
    Review of Regional Parks Management Plan Issues to consider by Sandra Coney, 12 October 2020 The Regional Parks Management Plan (RPMP) https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/plans-projects-policies-reports-bylaws/our-plans- strategies/topic-based-plans-strategies/parks-sports-outdoor-plans/Documents/regional- parks-management-plan.pdf is being reviewed and the public and stakeholders are being consulted. The RPMP is a statutory plan developed under the Reserves Act 1977. The current plan was adopted by the Auckland Regional Council in 2010 and then passed on to Auckland Council. In the first stage of the review, the Council is asking for feedback on what is important for the RPMP to cover. Once this is received, they will draft a plan which will go out for a second round of submissions. The deadline for comments on this phase is 26 October 2020. Send your submissions to [email protected] A draft RPMP will be released for comment in July/August 2021. Sandra Coney chaired the last review and has provided a commentary to guide people taking part in this review. What you are reading is a condensed version with just the recommendations. For the full version go here http://www.piha.co.nz/things-to-do/eat- sleep/regional-park/ Feel free to lift recommendations and use them in your own submissions. This commentary is written with the Waitakere Ranges Regional Park in mind. As the largest regional park (17,000 ha), the oldest regional park, the foundational park of the regional parks’ network, and as it is close to the most populated part of the Auckland region, the Waitakere Ranges parkland deserves special attention and faces particular challenges from kauri dieback and over-use.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Transport
    AUCKLAND TRANSPORT – BUILDING A SUCCESSFUL ORGANISATION FROM SCRATCH – AN ENGINEER’S PERSPECTIVE Jacqueline Robson Manager Investigation and Design North, Auckland Transport, Auckland, New Zealand Abstract Auckland Transport was formed as a result of the Local Government (Tamaki Makaurau Reorganisation) Act 2009. The legislation provided for the dissolution of the eight local and regional authorities in Auckland on 31 October 2010. Auckland Transport is a Council-Controlled Organisation that combines the transport expertise and functions of the former local and regional councils. Auckland Transport is a Road Controlling Authority and is responsible for all of the region’s transport services (excluding state highways) from roads and footpaths to cycling, parking and public transport. On 1 November 2010, 848 people, from various backgrounds and from eight very different local authorities, came together for the first time to take on new roles in new areas and/or new teams. Two years later, Auckland Transport has demonstrated a step-change in the delivery of transport infrastructure and is achieving or over-achieving on almost all of its performance measures. How did this happen? Was it by accident or by design? This paper describes, from an engineer’s perspective, the challenges encountered, the obstacles overcome and some of the methods employed in creating the successful organisation that Auckland Transport is today. Key Words Auckland Transport, council, amalgamation, capital works, investigation, design, project management. Introduction are the budget holders for the projects and have an overarching view of the entire project Auckland Transport (AT) came into being on lifecycle from planning to construction. They 1 November 2010 and, for the first time in also have particular responsibility for Auckland’s history, all of the city’s transport managing professional services contracts to functions and operations fell under the deliver the investigation and design phases of management of one organisation.
    [Show full text]