DOCSLIB.ORG

Cameron Run Watershed Management Plan, for Discussion at the Next Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cameron Run Watershed Management Plan, for Discussion at the Next Meeting APPENDIX C PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT MINUTES C-1 Advisory Committee Meetings C-2 Public Meetings C-1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK C-2 C-1 Advisory Committee Meetings C-3 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK C-4 Cameron Run Advisory Committee Meeting John Marshall Library, Alexandria, Virginia November 20, 2003 Advisory Committee Members in Attendance: Diane Davidson, Lake Barcroft Association Don Demetrius, Fairfax County Stormwater Division Susan Ellicott, Huntington Community Association Phyllis Evans, Huntington Community Association Robert Glass, Braddock District Supervisor’s Office Bill Hicks, Northern Virginia Regional Commission Bob Jordan, Fairfax Trails and Streams/Potomac River Greenways Coalition George Madill, Bren Mar Civic Association Mack Rhoades, President, Huntington Community Association Harry Shepler, Huntington Community Association Kevin Shunk, City of Alexandria Michael Wing, Supervisor Connolly/Providence District Project Team Staff in Attendance: Dipmani Kumar, Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services (DPWES) Amanda Peyton, Horne Engineering Services, Inc. Fred Rose, Fairfax County DPWES Nancy Roth, Versar, Inc. Jennifer Shore, Versar, Inc. Mark Southerland, Versar, Inc. The Cameron Run Watershed Plan: The Cameron Run watershed has experienced environmental degradation, mostly due to urbanization. A planning process initiated by Fairfax County is underway to improve the quality of the creek and its watershed. The Cameron Run Advisory Committee advises the Cameron Run Watershed Plan project team. Versar, Inc., prepares watershed plan drafts and engineering studies. Versar, Inc., and Horne Engineering Services, Inc. serve as facilitators for the public meetings. For more information, contact [email protected] or visit www.fairfaxcounty.gov/watersheds “The opinions represented herein do not necessarily represent those of Fairfax County or its agents.” Cameron Run Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes 1 November 20, 2003 Meeting Purpose: Attendees of the meeting were individuals invited by project team staff to serve on the Cameron Run Advisory Committee. The purpose of this meeting was to introduce the Cameron Run Watershed and discuss the overall watershed planning process. The overall goal of the Advisory Committee is to help Fairfax County develop a watershed management plan for Cameron Run that incorporates community interests in the evaluation and implementation of solutions for protecting and restoring the streams and other natural resources of the watershed. This process is also being implemented in other watersheds in Fairfax County, providing a consistent basis for watershed decision-making Key Decisions and Outcomes: . Advisory Committee Meetings will be held: Once per month At different locations within the watershed On an alternating Tuesday-Thursday schedule All meetings will be at 7:00 PM. The next meeting of the Advisory Committee will be held on December 16, 2003 at 7:00 PM. A meeting location and agenda will be sent prior to the meeting. The next meeting will include a brief primer on watershed concepts and how streams become degraded. Action Items: . Project staff will prepare a brief primer on watershed concepts and how streams become degraded for presentation at the next meeting. Project staff will search for information on projects identified by committee members as concerns in the watershed and will present findings to the Advisory Committee. Committee members will identify other individuals or groups that should be invited to participate in the Advisory Committee. Committee members will prepare general thoughts about issues to be addressed by the Cameron Run Watershed Management Plan, for discussion at the next meeting. Meeting Discussion: Mr. Rose of DPWES welcomed attendees to this initial meeting of the Cameron Run Advisory Committee. It was emphasized that this committee will assist the County in the development of the Cameron Run Watershed Management Plan. Through this committee, Fairfax County and the Cameron Run Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes 2 November 20, 2003 community will form a partnership that will result in a plan that is not only good for the environment, but good for the community as well. Mr. Kumar of DPWES gave attendees an overview and status of the county watershed planning process. Fairfax County has 30 designated watersheds, or natural drainage areas. The stream networks within these watersheds were assessed during a recently completed (October, 2003) countywide study. The assessment considered habitat and geomorphic conditions and inventoried problems such as deficient stream buffers and accelerated in-stream erosion as indicators of problems facing watersheds within Fairfax County. Of the 30 watersheds within Fairfax County, six have initiated the planning process: Cub Run, Bull Run, Popes Head Creek, Difficult Run, Cameron Run, and Little Hunting Creek. Ms. Shore of Versar, Inc. initiated an introduction session between committee and project staff members. Ms. Roth, also of Versar, presented an overview of the Cameron Run watershed and an introduction to the watershed planning process. The presentation covered the following topics: . Background information about Fairfax County watersheds . Steps for creating a Watershed Management Plan . A “Visual Tour” of the Cameron Run watershed . Public involvement in watershed planning process A watershed is an area of land that drains either directly, or through tributary streams into a particular river or water body. Fairfax County has designated 10 watersheds, representing 60% of the area in the county, as Phase I watersheds where planning has begun or will be initiated soon, including Cameron Run. Cameron Run, one of the largest watersheds in the county, measures a total of 44 square miles (33 square miles in Fairfax County) and includes several tributary systems (Holmes Run, Tripps Run, Lake Barcroft, Backlick Run, Indian Run, Turkeycock Run, and Pike Branch). A watershed plan is a tool that uses available watershed data to assess and manage the watershed. These plans provide goals and objectives for achieving management actions and recommending actions to prevent further watershed problems. In addition, these plans provide a benchmark against which the County can measure the progress of watershed solutions in the future. Fairfax County is undertaking development of Watershed Management Plans because 70% of the streams within the County are either in fair or poor condition as characterized by biological indicators (as assessed in the County’s Stream Protection Strategy baseline survey). Development of a plan will help Fairfax County meet Federal and State water quality standards, and help Virginia meet commitments in the Chesapeake 2000 agreement. Plans currently used by the County are outdated and do not take advantage of available stormwater management technology. Finally, a management plan will ensure that a comprehensive approach is taken to address regulations, commitments, and community needs. Cameron Run Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes 3 November 20, 2003 Cameron Run has a long history of urbanization with many impervious areas that create a large stormwater problem for the watershed area. Within the watershed area, two streams are located on the Environmental Protection Agency’s list of impaired waters. Under Section 303(d) of the 1972 Clean Water Act, states, territories, and authorized tribes are required to develop lists of impaired waters that do not meet established water quality standards even after point sources of pollution (e.g., water treatment plants) have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. The law requires that these jurisdictions establish priority rankings for waters on the 303(d) list and develop total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) for these waters. A TMDL specifies the maximum amount of a pollutant that a body of water can receive and still meet water quality standards, and allocates pollutant loadings among point and nonpoint (e.g., fertilizer runoff from yards) pollutant sources (Environmental Protection Agency 2003). The Cameron Run watershed comprises primarily residential land uses with few patches of forest. Urbanization has resulted in substantial physical impacts to the watershed including, but not limited to, erosion, flooding, and stream channel alteration. The County’s 2001 Stream Protection Strategy report listed Cameron Run as a Watershed Restoration Level II watershed. A Restoration Level II watershed is a watershed that is characterized by high development density, significantly degraded in-stream habitat conditions, and substantially degraded biological communities (DPWES 2001). A watershed management plan for Cameron Run will be designed to prevent further degradation to the watershed, improve water quality to meet Chesapeake Bay Program standards, as well as standards set by Federal, state, and local jurisdictions. Ms. Roth next explained why Fairfax County is interested in engaging the community during the development of the Cameron Run Watershed Management Plan. Community feedback will aid the County in pinpointing local problems (e.g., flooding or erosion) and then helping to facilitate solutions for those problems. Through the plan development process, the community as a whole will become more educated about the watershed and will be able to make more informed decisions. These decisions will ensure that the final management plan is effective in meeting water quality standards mentioned above,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Native Vascular Flora of the City of Alexandria, Virginia
    Native Vascular Flora City of Alexandria, Virginia Photo by Gary P. Fleming December 2015 Native Vascular Flora of the City of Alexandria, Virginia December 2015 By Roderick H. Simmons City of Alexandria Department of Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Activities, Natural Resources Division 2900-A Business Center Drive Alexandria, Virginia 22314 [email protected] Suggested citation: Simmons, R.H. 2015. Native vascular flora of the City of Alexandria, Virginia. City of Alexandria Department of Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Activities, Alexandria, Virginia. 104 pp. Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Climate ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Geology and Soils .................................................................................................................... 3 History of Botanical Studies in Alexandria .............................................................................. 5 Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TMDL) Action Plan
    City of Alexandria, Virginia Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Action Plan For compliance with 9VAC25-890, “General VPDES Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems, Permit No. VAR040057 June 17, 2015 Revised November 20, 2015 Revised June 30, 2016 Prepared by: City of Alexandria, Virginia Department of Transportation and Environmental Services Stormwater Management Division PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 3. Legal Authorities to Reduce Pollutant of Concern ............................................................... 3 4. Planning Framework ........................................................................................................... 3 a. Principles ......................................................................................................................... 3 b. Action Goals .................................................................................................................... 4 5. TMDL Development and Load Determination ..................................................................... 4 a. Four Mile Run Non-Tidal ................................................................................................. 4 b. Four Mile Run Tidal ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecological Study of Hunting Creek
    i An Ecological Study of Hunting Creek 2013 FINAL REPORT February 2014 by R. Christian Jones Professor, Department of Environmental Science and Policy Director, Potomac Environmental Research and Education Center George Mason University Project Director Kim de Mutsert Assistant Professor Department of Environmental Science and Policy George Mason University Co-Principal Investigator & Gregory D. Foster Professor, Department of Chemistry George Mason University Co-Principal Investigator to Alexandria Renew Enterprises Alexandria, VA ii Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary ............................................................................................... iii List of Abbreviations ...............................................................................................x The Aquatic Monitoring Program for the Hunting Creek Area of the Tidal Freshwater Potomac River ....................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................2 Introduction ..................................................................................................3 Methods........................................................................................................8 A. Profiles and Plankton: Sampling Day .........................................8 B. Profiles and Plankton: Followup
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROLE of OUTREACH EDUCATION in ACHIEVING ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY by Ann Elizabeth Wood-Arendt
    THE ROLE OF OUTREACH EDUCATION IN ACHIEVING ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY By Ann Elizabeth Wood-Arendt A major paper submitted to the faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF FORESTRY David L.Trauger, Chairman Gerald H. Cross James E. Johnson Brian Czech Harold E. Burkhart, Department Head April 4, 2003 Falls Church, Virginia Keywords: Environmental Education, Outreach Education, Environmental Education Needs Assessment, Environmental Literacy, Hunting Creek Watershed, UrBIN Project THE ROLE OF OUTREACH EDUCATION IN ACHIEVING ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY By Ann Elizabeth Wood-Arendt ABSTRACT Teachers of all disciplines are instrumental in shaping the characters and behaviors of future citizens. One of the greatest challenges facing environmental educators is relating to a population that is increasingly insulated from the natural world. An environmental education needs assessment of schools located in an urban watershed found that inadequate educator knowledge of environmental issues, lack of state proficiency standards for environmental education, and lack of funding for environmental projects are barriers hampering the achievement of environmental education objectives. Respondents to the Hunting Creek Watershed Environmental Education Needs Questionnaire desire greater knowledge of and access to non-biased, science-based resources for teaching environmental education. Outreach environmental education can fill the gap created by lack of teacher certification,
    [Show full text]
  • Cameron Run Watershed Management Plan Will Reduce Pollutant Loadings Throughout the Fairfax County Portion of the Watershed
    Acknowledgments The Cameron Run Watershed Plan was developed with the assistance of the Cameron Run Citizen’s Advisory Committee. We wish to thank the following individuals and organizations for contributing their time and knowledge in developing this draft plan: Dave Eckert, Falls Church Stream Stewards Diane Davidson, Lake Barcroft Association George Madil, Bren Mar Park Civic Association Kent Baake, Bren Mar Park Lincolnia Park Trails Association Kathy Joseph, Earth Sangha Glenda Booth, Fairfax County Wetlands Board Patrick Lucas, Fairfax Trails and Streams/Potomac River Greenways Coalition Richard Hartman, Huntington Association Davis Grant, Lake Barcroft Watershed Improvement District Jonathan Daw, Poplar Heights Civic Association Robert Taylor, Poplar Heights Recreation Association Russ Rosenberger, President of Madison Homes Joan Maguire, Providence District Board of Supervisors Bruce Williams, Sleepy Hollow Citizen Association Nick Byrne, Sleepy Hollow Homeowners Association Liz McKeeby, Supervisor Gross/Mason District Noel Kaplan, Fairfax County Department of Planning and Zoning Than Bawcombe, Fairfax County Stormwater Planning Stacey Sloan Blersch, USACE Baltimore District, Planning Division Chris Bright, Earth Sangha Florence Cavazos, Tripps Run resident Vince Cusumano, Pinecrest Homeowners Association Don Demetrius, Fairfax County Department of Public Works Charles deSeve, Lake Barcroft Water Improvement District James Dillon Eric Eckl Final Cameron Run Watershed Plan iii August 2007 Susan Ellicott, Huntington Community Association
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Management Plan
    CITY OF ALEXANDRIA MASTER PLAN Water Quality Management Supplement Adopted January 13, 2001 Water Quality Management Water Quality Management CITY OF ALEXANDRIA MASTER PLAN Executive Summary and Highlights The Chesapeake Bay – Alexandria’s downstream neighbor – is among the nation’s largest and most productive estuaries. However, carried along with the huge volumes of fresh water from the Bay’s 64,000 square mile watershed are sediments, fertilizers, pesticides, motor oil, and other pollut- ants generated by various land uses and human activities. In 1988, the Virginia General Assembly, recog- nizing that action had to be taken to preserve the Bay for future generations, enacted the Chesa- peake Bay Preservation Act. In 1992, the City of Alexandria adopted a Chesapeake Bay Preser- vation Ordinance (CBPO) to manage land devel- opment in a way that was more harmonious with the environment. The seal of the City of Alexandria highlights the City’s historical and However, this was only a first step. While the present day reliance on the Potomac City’s CBPO is the backbone of Alexandria’s wa- River. ter protection efforts, the Act also requires locali- ties to incorporate water quality protection into their comprehensive plans. This planning pro- cess is the “vision phase” of the Bay Act program and there are no predisposed outcomes. While CHAPTER CONTENTS the City’s CBPO sets out specific water quality ■ Introduction protection criteria, the planning process provides ■ Alexandria’s Water City officials and residents with an opportunity to Environment think strategically about the kind of environment ■ Pollution and Other they want to call home.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 State of Cameron Run and Its Subwatersheds
    Chapter 4 State of Cameron Run and its Subwatersheds 4.1 STATE OF CAMERON RUN WATERSHED Today, the Cameron Run mainstem is a flood-control channel whose surrounding area is characterized primarily by medium- to high-density urban development. The Cameron Run watershed (Figure 4-1) contains some of the oldest and most highly developed areas in Fairfax County. Nearly 95% of the watershed is developed with homes, strip malls, commercial enterprises, and extensive roadway systems. The major highways in Fairfax County that cross the watershed include the Capitol Beltway, Shirley Highway (I-395), Little River Turnpike (State Route 236), Arlington Boulevard (U.S. Route 50), and Lee Highway (U.S. Route 29). These major arteries contain the largest shopping areas as well as several commercial strip develop- ments on streets throughout the watershed. These include Arlington Boulevard, the intersections of Little River Turnpike and Columbia Pike, and northwest of the Beltway interchange along Gallows Road. Figure 4-1. Map of Cameron Run watershed The effects of development are apparent throughout the watershed. The historic floodplain of lower Cameron Run is now primarily a transportation corridor where the Capitol Beltway parallels the stream channel (Woodrow Wilson Bridge Project 2001). Industrial, commercial, and residential areas have replaced the wetlands and forests that once attenuated floodwaters. Small remnants of wetlands remain in the watershed. These include palustrine, lacustrine, and riverine wetlands (associated with tidal wetlands, open water bodies, and free-flowing tributaries, respectively). The channels of Cameron Run and Holmes Run were made into rocklined or Final Cameron Run Watershed Plan 4-1 August 2007 concrete channels to remove floodwaters from developed areas quickly.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Management Plan
    CITY OF FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA Watershed Management Plan City of Falls Church Department of Public Works Prepared with assistance from Adopted February 27, 2012 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. CITY OF FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA Watershed Management Plan Adopted February 27, 2012 City of Falls Church Department of Public Works 300 Park Avenue | Falls Church, Virginia 22046 www.fallschurchva.gov Prepared with assistance from AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 14428 Albemarle Point Place | Chantilly, Virginia 20151 www.amec.com (703) 488-3700 City of Falls Church Watershed Management Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The City of Falls Church Watershed Management Plan was developed with the assistance and guidance of the City of Falls Church Watershed Advisory Committee (WAC). The following individuals and organizations contributed their time, knowledge, and energy in developing this final plan: Member Association/Organization Nader Baroukh ..................................................... City Council Melissa Teates ...................................................... Village Preservation and Improvement Society Charles Wallace ................................................... Business Maureen Budetti................................................... Academia Vigdis Jacobsen ................................................... Cherry Hill/Winter Hill Heidi Schooner..................................................... Gresham Place Dennis Szymanski ................................................ Hillwood Avenue Richard Strong ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Cameron Run Watershed
    Chapter 2 Overview of the Cameron Run Watershed 2.1 WHAT IS THE CAMERON RUN WATERSHED? The Cameron Run watershed drains a 44-square-mile section of Northern Virginia. Thirty-three square miles of this area lie within the jurisdiction of Fairfax County; the remaining area lies within the cities of Falls Church and Alexandria (Figure 2-1). The western part of the watershed is within the Piedmont physiographic province (i.e., just west of the fall line); the eastern part is in the Coastal Plain. The Piedmont is an area of very old crystalline rocks underlying rolling hills. The Coastal Plain is characterized by a recent series of unconsolidated sedimentary strata (sands) typified by flat lands. Holmes Run is the primary headwater stream of the Cameron Run watershed. The headwaters of Holmes Run lie near the junction of the Capital Beltway (I-495) and I-66, approximately 1.5 miles west of the city of Falls Church. Flowing south and east, Holmes Run drains a portion of the area between Tyson’s Corner and the cities of Vienna and Falls Church. The stream crosses beneath four major highways before flowing into Lake Barcroft. Lake Barcroft is located at the confluence of Holmes Run and Tripps Run. Tripps Run drains the southeastern half of the city of Falls Church. Other major tributaries of Cameron Run are Backlick Run, Indian Run, and Pike Branch. Lake Barcroft (137 acres), Fairview Lake (15 acres), and four regional ponds are major waterbodies within the watershed. Figure 2-1. Cameron Run watershed Final Cameron Run Watershed Plan 2-1 August 2007 Approximately four miles southeast of Lake Barcroft, Holmes Run meets Backlick Run.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Lake Barcroft Probable Maximum Flood Inundation Mapping
    2008 Lake Barcroft Inundation Mapping Study Fairfax County, Virginia Prepared for: Lake Barcroft Watershed Improvement District (LBWID) 3650 Boat Dock Drive Falls Church, VA 22041 Prepared by: GKY & Associates, Inc. 4992 Lafayette Center Drive Suite 1850 Chantilly, Virginia 20151 DECEMBER 17, 2008 Table of Contents Page No. Executive Summary ....................................................................................... 1 Lake Barcroft Dam ......................................................................................... 3 Hydrology ........................................................................................................ 4 Hydraulics ...................................................................................................... 10 Inundation Mapping ..................................................................................... 14 Appendix A -- Elevation – Dam and Bascule Gate .................................. 16 Appendix B – Rainfall Distribution Comparisons .................................... 18 Appendix C – Hydrologic Scenario Details .............................................. 21 Appendix D – Hydrologic Breach Parameters ......................................... 25 Appendix E – Hydrologic Results Summary Table ................................. 27 Appendix F – Hydraulic Profiles ................................................................. 29 Appendix G – Hydraulic Profile Summary Table ..................................... 36 Appendix H – Hydraulic Profile Culvert Tables .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • FC 2019 MS4 Annual Report
    City of Falls Church, Virginia City of Falls Church Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) Permit Number VAR040065 Permit Four/Year One Annual Report July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2019 City of Falls Church Department of Public Works 300 Park Avenue Falls Church, VA 22046 Updated by: 4229 Lafayette Center Drive, Suite 1850 Chantilly, Virginia 20151 703-870-7000 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS David Tarter - Mayor Marybeth Connelly - Vice Mayor David F. Snyder Phil Duncan Dan Sze Letty Hardi Ross Litkenhous CITY MANAGER F. Wyatt Shields REPORT PREPARED AND COMPILED BY: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Alan R. Dalton, PE, City Stormwater Engineer CONTRIBUTING AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS Environmental Sustainability Council (ESC) Recreation & Parks Communications & Public Information Falls Church Public Schools (FCPS) Urban Forestry MS4 Annual Report Permit 4/Year 1 Table of Contents Signatory Authorizations ......................................................................................................................................4 Annual Report Certification ..................................................................................................................................4 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................5 2.0 Compliance with Minimum Control Measures (MCMs) ......................................................................... 5 2.1 Minimum Control Measure 1 - Public Education and Outreach .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FEMA Flood Insurance Study
    FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA (INDEPENDENT CITY) City of Alexandria JUN E 16, 2011 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 515519V000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial FIS Date: June 16, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination 2 2.0 AREA STUDIED 3 2.1 Scope of Study 3 2.2 Community Description 4 2.3 Principal Flood Problems 5 2.4 Flood Protection Measures 6 3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS 7 3.1 Hydrologic Analyses 7 3.2 Hydraulic Analyses 11 3.3 Vertical Datum 16 4.0 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 16 4.1 Floodplain Boundaries 17 4.2 Floodways 17 5.0 INSURANCE APPLICATIONS 19 6.0 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 19 7.0 OTHER STUDIES 20 8.0 LOCATION OF DATA 20 9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES 20 i TABLE
    [Show full text]