DOCSLIB.ORG

Cameron Run Watershed Management Plan References And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cameron Run Watershed Management Plan References And References AMEC. 2005. Popes Head Creek Watershed Management Plan: Final Draft. Prepared by AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc., Chantilly, VA for Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services, Stormwater Planning Division, Fairfax, VA. March. Bracken, A. and Finley, S. 2001. Lake Barcroft History. Falls Church, VA: Lake Barcroft Watershed Improvement District. Bryant, M., B. Smith, J. Randolph, M. Jeong, M. Lipscomb, and W. Randolph. 2003. Urban Biodiversity in the Holmes Run/Cameron Run Watershed: Landscape Assessment & Biodiversity Planning Considerations. Prepared by Departments of Landscape Architecture and Urban Affairs and Planning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA for National Biological Information Infrastructure, Urban Biodiversity Information Node Pilot (UrBIN). March. Center for Watershed Protection (CWP). 1998. Rapid Watershed Planning Handbook: Comprehensive Guide for Managing Urban Watershed. Ellicott City, MD. CH2MHill. 2004. Fairfax County Stream Physical Assessment. Prepared for Department of Public Works and Environmental Services Fairfax County, Virginia. February 2004. CH2MHill. 2002. Fairfax County Stream Physical Assessment Protocols: Draft. Prepared by CH2MHill, Herndon, VA for Stormwater Management Branch Fairfax County, VA. August. City of Portland. 2003. Sustainable Infrastructure Alternative Paving Materials Subcommittee Report: Draft, City of Portland, OR. October 3, 2003. http://www.trans.ci.portland.or.us/ Environment/AltPavingReport.pdf. [Accessed May 30, 2005]. Estes, Christine. Undated. Stream Flow in the Holmes Run/Cameron Run Watershed. FIW5974 Independent Study Report. Prepared by Christine Estes for Instructor David Trauger. Virginia Tech, Northern Virginia Campus. Fairfax County. 2001. Stream Protection Strategy: Baseline Study. Prepared by Stormwater Management Branch, Stormwater Planning Division, Department of Public Works and Environmental Services, Fairfax County, VA. January. Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group. 1998. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. FISRWG. 1998. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. By the Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group FISRWG (15 Federal agencies of the U.S. Gov’t). GPO Item No. 0120-A; SuDocs No. A 57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653. ISBN-0- 934213-59-3. Final Cameron Run Watershed Plan Ref-1 August 2007 Gernand, Bradley E. and Netherton, Nan, 2000. Falls Church: A Virginia Village Revisited. The Donning Co., Virginia Beach, VA. Maryland Department of the Environment. 2000a. 2000 Maryland Stormwater Design Manual. MDE, Water Management Administration, Baltimore, MD. Maryland Department of the Environment. 2000b. 2000 Maryland Stormwater Design Manual Fact Sheet. MDE, Water Management Administration, Baltimore, MD. Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC). Undated. Massachusetts Low Impact Development Toolkit, Fact Sheet # 5: Infiltration Trenches And Dry Wells. http://www.mapc.org/LID_files/trenchesdrywells.pdf. [Accessed June 4, 2005]. Palone, R. and A. Todd (eds.). 1998. Chesapeake Bay Riparian Handbook: A Guide for Establishing and Maintaining Riparian Forested Buffers. USDA Forest Service. NA-TP- 02.97. Radnor, PA. 1997 (Revised June 1998). Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. 1977. Cameron Run Watershed – Intermediate Action Plan. Fairfax County, Virginia. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. 1974. Cameron Run Environmental Baseline, Task Order 10.2. Fairfax County, Virginia. Prince George’s County. 1999. Low-Impact Development Design Strategies: An Integrated Design Approach. Prince Georges’s County, Maryland. Department of Environmental Resources Programs and Planning Division. June 1999. Schueler, Thomas R. and Holland, Heather K. The Practice of Watershed Protection. Article 143. The Center for Watershed Protection, 2000. Schumm, S.A., M.D. Harvey, and C.C. Watson. 1984. Incised Channels: Morphology, Dynamics, and Control. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado. USACE and VDEQ. 2003. Stream Attributes Crediting Methodology: Impact and Compensation Reaches. Proposed Methodology. Prepared by USACE, Norfolk District and Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Water Protection Permit Program. www.nao.usace.army.mil/Regulatory/PN/StreamPN/Stream%20attributes%20PN.htm. December 19, 2003. [Accessed October 14, 2004]. Woodrow Wilson Bridge Project. 2001. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/- Section 4(f) Evaluation. Volumes I & II. Final Cameron Run Watershed Plan Ref-2 August 2007 Glossary Abatement: Reducing the degree or intensity of, or eliminating, pollution, as in a water pollution abatement program. Annual Flood Series: A list of annual floods for a given period of time. Annual Low-Flow: The lowest flow occurring each year, usually the lowest average flow for periods of perhaps 3, 7, 15, 30, 60, 120, or 180 consecutive days. Annual Runoff: The total quantity of water in runoff for a drainage area for the year. Data reports may use any of the following units of measurement in presenting annual runoff data: (1) acre-feet (AC-FT, acre-ft, af)– the quantity of water required to cover 1 acre to a depth of 1 foot and is equal to 43,560 cubic feet, 325,851 gallons, or 1,234 cubic meters; (2) cubic feet per second per square mile (CFSM, (ft3/s) mi2) – the average number of cubic feet of water flowing per second from each square mile of area drained, assuming the runoff is distributed uniformly in time and area; (3) inch (In., in.) – the depth to which a drainage area would be covered with water if all the runoff for a given time period was uniformly distributed on it. Aqueduct: (1) A pipe, conduit, or channel designed to transport water from a remote source, usually by gravity. (2) A bridge-like structure supporting a conduit or canal passing over a river or low ground. Bacteria: Single celled organisms that can cause diseases. Berm: (1) A narrow ledge or path as at the top or bottom of a slope, stream bank, or along a beach. (2) (Dam) A horizontal step or bench in the upstream or downstream face of an Embankment Dam. Best Management Practice (BMP): A structural or nonstructural practice that is designed to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to waterbodies and to minimize the impacts of changes in land use on surface and groundwater systems. Structural best management practices refer to basins or facilities engineered for the purpose of reducing the pollutant load in stormwater runoff, such as bioretention, constructed stormwater wetlands, etc. Nonstructural best management practices refer to land use or development practices that are determined to be effective in minimizing the impact on receiving stream systems such as the preservation of open space and stream buffers, disconnection of impervious surfaces, etc. BMPs also include treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practice to control plant site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage. Bioretention Basin: A water quality best management practice engineered to filter the water quality volume through an engineered planting bed, consisting of a vegetated surface layer (vegetation, mulch, ground cover), planting soil, and sand bed (optional), and into the in-situ material. Also called rain gardens. Final Cameron Run Watershed Plan GL-1 August 2007 Bioretention Filter: A bioretention basin with the addition of a sand layer and collector pipe system beneath the planting bed. Buffer: An area of natural or established vegetation managed to protect other components of a resource protection area and save waters from significant degradation due to land disturbances, also a Riparian Buffer. Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas: Any land designated by the County pursuant to Part III of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Designation and Management Regulations and Code of Virginia, Section 10.1-2107. A Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area shall consist of a resource protection area and a resource management area. Capacity: The amount of water that a channel can accommodate up to its bank full condition, which is dependent on its slope, roughness characteristics, and geometric shape. Channel: A natural or manmade waterway. Confluence: The joining point where two or more streams create a combined, larger stream. Constructed Stormwater Wetlands: Areas intentionally designed and created to emulate the water quality improvement function of wetlands for the primary purpose of removing pollutants from stormwater. Detention Basin: A stormwater management facility that temporarily impounds runoff and discharges it through a hydraulic outlet structure to a downstream conveyance system. While a certain amount of overflow may also occur via infiltration through the surrounding soil, such amounts are negligible when compared to the outlet structure discharge rates, and therefore, are not considered in the facility’s design. Since a detention basin impounds runoff only temporarily, it is normally dry during periods of no rainfall. Easement: A legal instrument enabling the giving, selling, of taking or certain land or water rights without transfer of title, such as for the passage of utility lines. An affirmative easement gives the owner of the easement the right to use the land for a stated purpose. A negative easement is an agreement with a private property owner to limit the development of his land in specific ways. Ecosystem: All of the component organisms of a community and their
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Native Vascular Flora of the City of Alexandria, Virginia
    Native Vascular Flora City of Alexandria, Virginia Photo by Gary P. Fleming December 2015 Native Vascular Flora of the City of Alexandria, Virginia December 2015 By Roderick H. Simmons City of Alexandria Department of Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Activities, Natural Resources Division 2900-A Business Center Drive Alexandria, Virginia 22314 [email protected] Suggested citation: Simmons, R.H. 2015. Native vascular flora of the City of Alexandria, Virginia. City of Alexandria Department of Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Activities, Alexandria, Virginia. 104 pp. Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Climate ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Geology and Soils .................................................................................................................... 3 History of Botanical Studies in Alexandria .............................................................................. 5 Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TMDL) Action Plan
    City of Alexandria, Virginia Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Action Plan For compliance with 9VAC25-890, “General VPDES Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems, Permit No. VAR040057 June 17, 2015 Revised November 20, 2015 Revised June 30, 2016 Prepared by: City of Alexandria, Virginia Department of Transportation and Environmental Services Stormwater Management Division PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 3. Legal Authorities to Reduce Pollutant of Concern ............................................................... 3 4. Planning Framework ........................................................................................................... 3 a. Principles ......................................................................................................................... 3 b. Action Goals .................................................................................................................... 4 5. TMDL Development and Load Determination ..................................................................... 4 a. Four Mile Run Non-Tidal ................................................................................................. 4 b. Four Mile Run Tidal ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecological Study of Hunting Creek
    i An Ecological Study of Hunting Creek 2013 FINAL REPORT February 2014 by R. Christian Jones Professor, Department of Environmental Science and Policy Director, Potomac Environmental Research and Education Center George Mason University Project Director Kim de Mutsert Assistant Professor Department of Environmental Science and Policy George Mason University Co-Principal Investigator & Gregory D. Foster Professor, Department of Chemistry George Mason University Co-Principal Investigator to Alexandria Renew Enterprises Alexandria, VA ii Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary ............................................................................................... iii List of Abbreviations ...............................................................................................x The Aquatic Monitoring Program for the Hunting Creek Area of the Tidal Freshwater Potomac River ....................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................2 Introduction ..................................................................................................3 Methods........................................................................................................8 A. Profiles and Plankton: Sampling Day .........................................8 B. Profiles and Plankton: Followup
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROLE of OUTREACH EDUCATION in ACHIEVING ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY by Ann Elizabeth Wood-Arendt
    THE ROLE OF OUTREACH EDUCATION IN ACHIEVING ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY By Ann Elizabeth Wood-Arendt A major paper submitted to the faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF FORESTRY David L.Trauger, Chairman Gerald H. Cross James E. Johnson Brian Czech Harold E. Burkhart, Department Head April 4, 2003 Falls Church, Virginia Keywords: Environmental Education, Outreach Education, Environmental Education Needs Assessment, Environmental Literacy, Hunting Creek Watershed, UrBIN Project THE ROLE OF OUTREACH EDUCATION IN ACHIEVING ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY By Ann Elizabeth Wood-Arendt ABSTRACT Teachers of all disciplines are instrumental in shaping the characters and behaviors of future citizens. One of the greatest challenges facing environmental educators is relating to a population that is increasingly insulated from the natural world. An environmental education needs assessment of schools located in an urban watershed found that inadequate educator knowledge of environmental issues, lack of state proficiency standards for environmental education, and lack of funding for environmental projects are barriers hampering the achievement of environmental education objectives. Respondents to the Hunting Creek Watershed Environmental Education Needs Questionnaire desire greater knowledge of and access to non-biased, science-based resources for teaching environmental education. Outreach environmental education can fill the gap created by lack of teacher certification,
    [Show full text]
  • Cameron Run Watershed Management Plan Will Reduce Pollutant Loadings Throughout the Fairfax County Portion of the Watershed
    Acknowledgments The Cameron Run Watershed Plan was developed with the assistance of the Cameron Run Citizen’s Advisory Committee. We wish to thank the following individuals and organizations for contributing their time and knowledge in developing this draft plan: Dave Eckert, Falls Church Stream Stewards Diane Davidson, Lake Barcroft Association George Madil, Bren Mar Park Civic Association Kent Baake, Bren Mar Park Lincolnia Park Trails Association Kathy Joseph, Earth Sangha Glenda Booth, Fairfax County Wetlands Board Patrick Lucas, Fairfax Trails and Streams/Potomac River Greenways Coalition Richard Hartman, Huntington Association Davis Grant, Lake Barcroft Watershed Improvement District Jonathan Daw, Poplar Heights Civic Association Robert Taylor, Poplar Heights Recreation Association Russ Rosenberger, President of Madison Homes Joan Maguire, Providence District Board of Supervisors Bruce Williams, Sleepy Hollow Citizen Association Nick Byrne, Sleepy Hollow Homeowners Association Liz McKeeby, Supervisor Gross/Mason District Noel Kaplan, Fairfax County Department of Planning and Zoning Than Bawcombe, Fairfax County Stormwater Planning Stacey Sloan Blersch, USACE Baltimore District, Planning Division Chris Bright, Earth Sangha Florence Cavazos, Tripps Run resident Vince Cusumano, Pinecrest Homeowners Association Don Demetrius, Fairfax County Department of Public Works Charles deSeve, Lake Barcroft Water Improvement District James Dillon Eric Eckl Final Cameron Run Watershed Plan iii August 2007 Susan Ellicott, Huntington Community Association
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Management Plan
    CITY OF ALEXANDRIA MASTER PLAN Water Quality Management Supplement Adopted January 13, 2001 Water Quality Management Water Quality Management CITY OF ALEXANDRIA MASTER PLAN Executive Summary and Highlights The Chesapeake Bay – Alexandria’s downstream neighbor – is among the nation’s largest and most productive estuaries. However, carried along with the huge volumes of fresh water from the Bay’s 64,000 square mile watershed are sediments, fertilizers, pesticides, motor oil, and other pollut- ants generated by various land uses and human activities. In 1988, the Virginia General Assembly, recog- nizing that action had to be taken to preserve the Bay for future generations, enacted the Chesa- peake Bay Preservation Act. In 1992, the City of Alexandria adopted a Chesapeake Bay Preser- vation Ordinance (CBPO) to manage land devel- opment in a way that was more harmonious with the environment. The seal of the City of Alexandria highlights the City’s historical and However, this was only a first step. While the present day reliance on the Potomac City’s CBPO is the backbone of Alexandria’s wa- River. ter protection efforts, the Act also requires locali- ties to incorporate water quality protection into their comprehensive plans. This planning pro- cess is the “vision phase” of the Bay Act program and there are no predisposed outcomes. While CHAPTER CONTENTS the City’s CBPO sets out specific water quality ■ Introduction protection criteria, the planning process provides ■ Alexandria’s Water City officials and residents with an opportunity to Environment think strategically about the kind of environment ■ Pollution and Other they want to call home.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 State of Cameron Run and Its Subwatersheds
    Chapter 4 State of Cameron Run and its Subwatersheds 4.1 STATE OF CAMERON RUN WATERSHED Today, the Cameron Run mainstem is a flood-control channel whose surrounding area is characterized primarily by medium- to high-density urban development. The Cameron Run watershed (Figure 4-1) contains some of the oldest and most highly developed areas in Fairfax County. Nearly 95% of the watershed is developed with homes, strip malls, commercial enterprises, and extensive roadway systems. The major highways in Fairfax County that cross the watershed include the Capitol Beltway, Shirley Highway (I-395), Little River Turnpike (State Route 236), Arlington Boulevard (U.S. Route 50), and Lee Highway (U.S. Route 29). These major arteries contain the largest shopping areas as well as several commercial strip develop- ments on streets throughout the watershed. These include Arlington Boulevard, the intersections of Little River Turnpike and Columbia Pike, and northwest of the Beltway interchange along Gallows Road. Figure 4-1. Map of Cameron Run watershed The effects of development are apparent throughout the watershed. The historic floodplain of lower Cameron Run is now primarily a transportation corridor where the Capitol Beltway parallels the stream channel (Woodrow Wilson Bridge Project 2001). Industrial, commercial, and residential areas have replaced the wetlands and forests that once attenuated floodwaters. Small remnants of wetlands remain in the watershed. These include palustrine, lacustrine, and riverine wetlands (associated with tidal wetlands, open water bodies, and free-flowing tributaries, respectively). The channels of Cameron Run and Holmes Run were made into rocklined or Final Cameron Run Watershed Plan 4-1 August 2007 concrete channels to remove floodwaters from developed areas quickly.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Management Plan
    CITY OF FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA Watershed Management Plan City of Falls Church Department of Public Works Prepared with assistance from Adopted February 27, 2012 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. CITY OF FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA Watershed Management Plan Adopted February 27, 2012 City of Falls Church Department of Public Works 300 Park Avenue | Falls Church, Virginia 22046 www.fallschurchva.gov Prepared with assistance from AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 14428 Albemarle Point Place | Chantilly, Virginia 20151 www.amec.com (703) 488-3700 City of Falls Church Watershed Management Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The City of Falls Church Watershed Management Plan was developed with the assistance and guidance of the City of Falls Church Watershed Advisory Committee (WAC). The following individuals and organizations contributed their time, knowledge, and energy in developing this final plan: Member Association/Organization Nader Baroukh ..................................................... City Council Melissa Teates ...................................................... Village Preservation and Improvement Society Charles Wallace ................................................... Business Maureen Budetti................................................... Academia Vigdis Jacobsen ................................................... Cherry Hill/Winter Hill Heidi Schooner..................................................... Gresham Place Dennis Szymanski ................................................ Hillwood Avenue Richard Strong ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Cameron Run Watershed
    Chapter 2 Overview of the Cameron Run Watershed 2.1 WHAT IS THE CAMERON RUN WATERSHED? The Cameron Run watershed drains a 44-square-mile section of Northern Virginia. Thirty-three square miles of this area lie within the jurisdiction of Fairfax County; the remaining area lies within the cities of Falls Church and Alexandria (Figure 2-1). The western part of the watershed is within the Piedmont physiographic province (i.e., just west of the fall line); the eastern part is in the Coastal Plain. The Piedmont is an area of very old crystalline rocks underlying rolling hills. The Coastal Plain is characterized by a recent series of unconsolidated sedimentary strata (sands) typified by flat lands. Holmes Run is the primary headwater stream of the Cameron Run watershed. The headwaters of Holmes Run lie near the junction of the Capital Beltway (I-495) and I-66, approximately 1.5 miles west of the city of Falls Church. Flowing south and east, Holmes Run drains a portion of the area between Tyson’s Corner and the cities of Vienna and Falls Church. The stream crosses beneath four major highways before flowing into Lake Barcroft. Lake Barcroft is located at the confluence of Holmes Run and Tripps Run. Tripps Run drains the southeastern half of the city of Falls Church. Other major tributaries of Cameron Run are Backlick Run, Indian Run, and Pike Branch. Lake Barcroft (137 acres), Fairview Lake (15 acres), and four regional ponds are major waterbodies within the watershed. Figure 2-1. Cameron Run watershed Final Cameron Run Watershed Plan 2-1 August 2007 Approximately four miles southeast of Lake Barcroft, Holmes Run meets Backlick Run.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Lake Barcroft Probable Maximum Flood Inundation Mapping
    2008 Lake Barcroft Inundation Mapping Study Fairfax County, Virginia Prepared for: Lake Barcroft Watershed Improvement District (LBWID) 3650 Boat Dock Drive Falls Church, VA 22041 Prepared by: GKY & Associates, Inc. 4992 Lafayette Center Drive Suite 1850 Chantilly, Virginia 20151 DECEMBER 17, 2008 Table of Contents Page No. Executive Summary ....................................................................................... 1 Lake Barcroft Dam ......................................................................................... 3 Hydrology ........................................................................................................ 4 Hydraulics ...................................................................................................... 10 Inundation Mapping ..................................................................................... 14 Appendix A -- Elevation – Dam and Bascule Gate .................................. 16 Appendix B – Rainfall Distribution Comparisons .................................... 18 Appendix C – Hydrologic Scenario Details .............................................. 21 Appendix D – Hydrologic Breach Parameters ......................................... 25 Appendix E – Hydrologic Results Summary Table ................................. 27 Appendix F – Hydraulic Profiles ................................................................. 29 Appendix G – Hydraulic Profile Summary Table ..................................... 36 Appendix H – Hydraulic Profile Culvert Tables .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cameron Run Watershed Management Plan, for Discussion at the Next Meeting
    APPENDIX C PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT MINUTES C-1 Advisory Committee Meetings C-2 Public Meetings C-1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK C-2 C-1 Advisory Committee Meetings C-3 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK C-4 Cameron Run Advisory Committee Meeting John Marshall Library, Alexandria, Virginia November 20, 2003 Advisory Committee Members in Attendance: Diane Davidson, Lake Barcroft Association Don Demetrius, Fairfax County Stormwater Division Susan Ellicott, Huntington Community Association Phyllis Evans, Huntington Community Association Robert Glass, Braddock District Supervisor’s Office Bill Hicks, Northern Virginia Regional Commission Bob Jordan, Fairfax Trails and Streams/Potomac River Greenways Coalition George Madill, Bren Mar Civic Association Mack Rhoades, President, Huntington Community Association Harry Shepler, Huntington Community Association Kevin Shunk, City of Alexandria Michael Wing, Supervisor Connolly/Providence District Project Team Staff in Attendance: Dipmani Kumar, Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services (DPWES) Amanda Peyton, Horne Engineering Services, Inc. Fred Rose, Fairfax County DPWES Nancy Roth, Versar, Inc. Jennifer Shore, Versar, Inc. Mark Southerland, Versar, Inc. The Cameron Run Watershed Plan: The Cameron Run watershed has experienced environmental degradation, mostly due to urbanization. A planning process initiated by Fairfax County is underway to improve the quality of the creek and its watershed. The Cameron Run Advisory Committee advises the Cameron Run Watershed Plan project
    [Show full text]
  • FC 2019 MS4 Annual Report
    City of Falls Church, Virginia City of Falls Church Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) Permit Number VAR040065 Permit Four/Year One Annual Report July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2019 City of Falls Church Department of Public Works 300 Park Avenue Falls Church, VA 22046 Updated by: 4229 Lafayette Center Drive, Suite 1850 Chantilly, Virginia 20151 703-870-7000 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS David Tarter - Mayor Marybeth Connelly - Vice Mayor David F. Snyder Phil Duncan Dan Sze Letty Hardi Ross Litkenhous CITY MANAGER F. Wyatt Shields REPORT PREPARED AND COMPILED BY: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Alan R. Dalton, PE, City Stormwater Engineer CONTRIBUTING AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS Environmental Sustainability Council (ESC) Recreation & Parks Communications & Public Information Falls Church Public Schools (FCPS) Urban Forestry MS4 Annual Report Permit 4/Year 1 Table of Contents Signatory Authorizations ......................................................................................................................................4 Annual Report Certification ..................................................................................................................................4 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................5 2.0 Compliance with Minimum Control Measures (MCMs) ......................................................................... 5 2.1 Minimum Control Measure 1 - Public Education and Outreach .............................................................
    [Show full text]