DOCSLIB.ORG

Western Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Western Australia WESTERN AUSTRALIA LAW AND JUSTICE FOUNDATION COLLABORATIVE PLANNING RESOURCE – JURISDICTIONAL DATA 2015 The Law and Justice Foundation of New South Wales (LJF) Collaborative Planning Resource (CPR) is intended to support the planning of legal assistance services by Australian jurisdictions. In 2015 this resource will be delivered in two parts: The LJF Collaborative Planning Resource – Service Planning (CPR-SP) summarises the research evidence on legal need and access to justice and the implications for planning legal service delivery. The geographical location of legal services, while important, is only one key aspect of planning and delivering effective legal assistance services to those most in need. Recognising the variation between different priority groups and the overlap between them, services can be targeted at identified client groups; timely to client’s experience; appropriate to varying legal need and capability; and joined-up as part of a holistic response. i Service design is likely to vary accordingly. For instance, reaching hard to find groups through other (often non-legal) services with which they have regular contact. The CPR-SP also provides useful information for designing appropriate legal services for specific priority demographic groups: ‘who’ priority clients are, ‘what’ types of services are appropriate to their legal needs and capabilities, and ‘how’ these services might be delivered. The LJF Collaborative Planning Resource – Jurisdictional Data (CPR-JD) brings together three sets of information relevant to making decisions about legal assistance provision: • The geographic distribution of the Commonwealth’s priority groups for services • The prevalence of experiencing legal problems for each priority group • The geographic distribution of those most likely to be in need of legal assistance services for financial or other reasons. Other information will also be relevant to service planning. Individual jurisdictions may have access to relevant information such as data on the location of existing legal assistance services and their existing client base, private solicitorsii, other social services, crime, family violence, debt, accidents, natural disasters, business closures and other external factors that may increase demand for legal assistance. The LJF will issue new versions of the CPR-JD as new information becomes available. The data provided is available for a range of geographical boundaries. Please contact the LJF on (+61 2 8227 3200) or via email ([email protected]) to discuss the options available or to provide feedback on the current version. Version & date Key amendments Authors JPR 2015 - Part 1 Version 1 provided data at LGA level Catriona Mirrlees-Black & Sarah May 2015 Williams CPR-JD 2015 Text changes. Additional data and maps providing SA2 Catriona Mirrlees-Black & Sarah 5 August 2015 distribution of priority groups Williams This report is provided under embargo for the purpose of collaborative planning pending publication of both parts of the Collaborative Planning Resource by the LJF. While due care has been taken in preparing the material presented in the JPR 2015, the LJF is not responsible for the use, interpretation or application of the material or its suitability for any particular purpose. WESTERN AUSTRALIA SECTION 1 - PRIORITY GROUPS The Australian 2015 National Partnership Agreement (NPA) on Legal Assistance Services between the Commonwealth of Australia and the states/territories identifies a number of priority groups for legal assistance services. These are people whose capability to resolve legal problems may be compromised by circumstances of vulnerability and/or disadvantage. People in priority groups are more likely to experience legal problems, and/or less likely to seek assistance or able to access services for a range of reasons. The 2015 NPA requires Australian legal assistance service providers to focus Commonwealth funded services on people experiencing financial disadvantage and, where appropriate, to plan and target their services to people who fall within priority client groups. The NPA provides the following list of priority groups for guidance: • Children and young people (under 25) • Indigenous Australians • Older people (over 64) • People experiencing, or at risk of family violence • People experiencing or at risk of homelessness • People in custody and prisoners • People residing in rural or remote areas • People who are culturally and linguistically diverse • People with a disability or mental illness • People with low education levels; and • Single parents. The NPA requires Australian states and territories to use an evidence base to identify priority clients and the geographic locations in which people have the highest levels of legal need. The CPR-JD 2015 supports this activity by providing information for each jurisdiction on the geographic distribution of • the priority groups for legal assistance services identified by the 2015 National Partnership Agreement (NPA), and • those people most likely to be in need of legal assistance services for financial or other reasons. The data provided here is intended to complement other information available to jurisdictions for planning, including administrative data and other information relevant to the demand for legal assistance. Law and Justice Foundation CPR-JD 2015. Based on Australian Bureau of Statistics data. Page 2 WESTERN AUSTRALIA SECTION 2 - PREVALENCE OF EXPERIENCING LEGAL PROBLEMS The best available measure of the extent of legal problems at state/territory level is the LAW Survey.iii The survey also identifies the personal characteristics that increase the chance of experiencing a legal problem. However, because it is a survey of only a sample of the population, the number of people interviewed in smaller geographic areas, such as LGAs, is generally insufficient to provide robust measures. There have been previous attempts to estimate the prevalence of legal problems in LGAs using information about the extent to which people with particular characteristics experience problems and applying to this the population profile of an LGA. However, these estimates are likely to have a wide margin of error and, therefore, may not be useful for distinguishing between areas.iv Area-based measures of disadvantage, such as SEIFA, are also limited as indicators of legal problem prevalence, in part because the experience of legal problems is widespread and not necessarily related to the characteristics included in the index.v About half of Australian residents will experience a legal problem every year. Some people, due to their personal circumstances, are at increased risk of experiencing a problem, such as single parents, people with a disability and the unemployed.vi Having more than one type of disadvantage increases the risk significantly.vii Not everyone who experiences a legal problem will identify it as such, and not everyone who does will prefer a legal response or seek legal assistance. Further information from the LAW Survey on priority groups’ strategies for managing their problems is provided in CPR-SP. The table below shows the average percentage of each priority group that experienced at least one legal problem in a year. These figures from the LAW Survey are for groups that in some cases vary from the Australian Bureau of Statistics Census definitions. A comparison of priority group definitions is provided in Section 13. NLAS(Capability) Group NLAS(Capability) Group NLAS(Indigenous) Group NLAS(CALD) 15 over and population LGA - people disadvantaged Financially 15 over and income personal - people disadvantaged Financially ages all income household education low with People people Unemployed parents Single 24 youth under and and Children 15-24 youth Disengaged People 65 and over People with a disability 18-74 15 over and Australians Indigenous Culturally and linguistically diverse people (CALD) Homeless people Outer regional/remote LGA has correctional facility Percentate of people experiencing legal problems in WA (LAW survey 2012) 52 48 n/a 45 60 74 50 n/a 38 65 55 42 n/a 47 n/a Law and Justice Foundation CPR-JD 2015. Based on Australian Bureau of Statistics data. Page 3 WESTERN AUSTRALIA SECTION 3 - NEED FOR LEGAL ASSISTANCE INDICATORS (NLAS) Given that the experience of legal problems is so widespread, and not everyone will require or prefer a legal response, an alternative approach to service planning is to focus on identifying who is most likely to need access to legal assistance services once a problem has been experienced. That is, focusing on those people who are least likely to have the personal or financial resources to manage their own problems and are most likely to be eligible for legal assistance services. To facilitate this alternative approach to service planning, the LJF has developed the concept of the NLAS indicator. NLAS(Capability) Legal needs research has consistently highlighted that some people are less capable of managing legal problems themselves. Legal capability is defined as the personal characteristics or competencies necessary for an individual to resolve legal problems effectively.viii It generally comprises capabilities across a number of domains including sufficient cognitive, communication and literacy skills to successfully seek and obtain legal information or assistance.ix Legal assistance services generally focus on people with low capability. These people are often less able to use self- help and unbundled services effectively and are unlikely
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Perth Freight Link: Facts and Fiction Prepared by Peter Newman and Philip Jennings for the Beeliar Group – Professors for Environmental Responsibility
    For Release 8 Feb 2017 The Perth Freight Link: Facts and Fiction Prepared by Peter Newman and Philip Jennings for The Beeliar Group – Professors for Environmental Responsibility The supporters of Roe 8 and the Perth Freight Link (PFL) have been spreading misinformation and half truths about the developments. Their aim is to discredit alternatives by the selective use of the facts. This analysis of the Roe 8 and PFL myths provides a more complete picture. Myth 1: The PFL has been on the books for 60 years and no one objected until recently. The PFL was a Prime Minister Abbott “Captain’s Call” presented to the former Transport Minister, Dean Nalder, at a meeting in Canberra in early 2015, along with similar highly controversial roads in Melbourne and Sydney. The Melbourne East-West Link was rejected by the Victorian people at their last election. It is extremely unusual to have a road project proposed by a Commonwealth politician and it has disrupted all planning processes since it was dropped on Perth without any history or warning. The PFL is still a vague proposal and the detailed design has never been released publicly or assessed by the EPA. Roe 8 was included in the Metropolitan Region Scheme in 1963 without any public consultation or environmental impact assessment as part of a ring road bringing traffic to the coast between North Coogee and South Beach and then north to Fremantle. The Cockburn Wetlands Study of 1975 first suggested that the road should not proceed. The first environmental assessment was carried out by the EPA in 1978 and it recommended in its System Six report in 1980 that a new route be found because the proposed route was environmentally unacceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • ECM 5553401 V1 North Coogee Foreshore Management Plan
    NORTH COOGEE FORESHORE MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by: Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd Document Status Reviewer Approved for Issue Rev. No. Author Name Signature Name Signature Date 1 DK,MW, SB DK 2 DK,MW, SB MW 3 DK,MW, SB AW MW 4 MW DK DK 27/3/07 5 MW DK DK 4/5/07 6 MW 4/5/07 FINAL DRAFT MW DK FINAL MW DK DK 20/11/07 FINAL rev 1 PJ MW MW 19/06/08 FINAL rev 2 PJ MW MW 27/06/08 FINAL rev 3 PJ MW MW 26/03/09 5638-1338-07R March, 2009 Document Set ID: 5553401 Version: 1, Version Date: 03/02/2017 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT FOR: North Coogee Foreshore Management Plan Copyright © 1987-2009 Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd ABN 70 070 128 675 Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), the whole or any part of this report may not be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owner, Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd. This includes microcopying, photocopying or recording of any parts of the report. Neither may the information contained in this report be reproduced, transmitted or stored electronically in any form, such as in a retrieval system, without the specific written permission of Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd. Limitations Statement This report has been exclusively drafted for the needs of STOCKLAND & LANDCORP in conjunction with the CITY OF COCKBURN. No express or implied warranties are made by Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd regarding the research findings and data contained in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Research
    RESIDENTIAL RESEARCH Greater Perth higher density residential development site sales tallied $213.36 million in the year ending 31 August 2015. Despite a slowdown in residential $20.50 million; both projects being development sites sales across Greater marketed in 2015. Other recent major site In the past year, by value, 64.6% Perth, the construction phase is active sales, with potential for higher density in of Greater Perth development with many projects kicking-off earlier Greater Perth, have been listed in Table 1 sites were sold to foreign than scheduled due to the majority of on page 4. investors. apartments selling off-the-plan in the Inner and Middle Suburbs regions. Over the two years to the end of August 2015, the Inner Suburbs region recorded Foreign investors have a the highest volume of residential proposed $1.32 billion Sales Volume worth of development site sales at $275.79 million, residential developments in the whilst the Perth CBD saw $32.90 million pipeline in WA. Sales turnover of major sites, likely for higher density development in Greater in sales. The Middle Suburbs region, Perth, grew substantially over the three resulted in sales in the order of $147.11 Lone person households are years to 31 August 2014 to stand at million over the same time. projected to have the highest $322.23 million, as shown in Figure 1. growth at 3.0% per annum over However, the twelve months to the end There are significant infrastructure the next twenty years of August 2015, recorded $213.36 million projects currently under construction that worth of transacted sales, reflecting the will greatly benefit not only these regions, weaker buyer sentiment in the wider but the Greater Perth area, including Strong pipeline of committed Perth property market.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission of Form BA20 Notice of Consent to the Department of Housing
    Submission of Form BA20 Notice of Consent to the Department of Housing The following contact details should be used in relation to obtaining written consent from the Department of Housing as the adjoining property owner along a shared property boundary. 1. Where the Department of Housing property is occupied or construction has been completed the attached list of suburbs should be used to identify the Regional Office responsible for that suburb. The Notice of Consent Form BA20 and relevant documentation should be submitted to the Regional Manager using the details provided for that particular office. 2. Where construction has not yet commenced on the Department of Housing property or where construction is still in progress then the Notice of Consent Form BA20 and relevant documentation should be submitted to the Manager Professional Services using the details provided. NOTE – Approval will be delayed if the Notice of Consent Form BA20 and relevant documentation is not submitted to the correct processing area.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Package for Applicants Strategic Planning Services
    Information Package for Applicants Strategic Planning Services Further information: call Carol Catherwood on 9411 3598 email [email protected] Acknowledgement of Country The City of Cockburn acknowledges the Nyungar people who are the traditional custodians of this land. We pay respect to the Nyungar Elders past, present and future and extend that respect to all Aboriginal Australians. About the City of Cockburn The City of Cockburn is home to some of Western Australia's best wetlands, major tourism attractions, growing communities and leisure and recreational activities. There are many things to see and do and the City offers visitors and residents a supreme quality of life. Stunning coastline The City is home to coastal communities near protected and pristine beaches. These areas offer residents a laid-back lifestyle. Port Coogee is an idyllic harbour in one of Perth’s newest seaside communities. Coogee Beach and the Woodman Point recreation reserve house a range of leisure activities. Visitors can enjoy fishing, boating, kite-surfing, camping and hiking. The Australian Marine Complex (AMC) in Henderson is Western Australia’s largest ship-building centre. The AMC services the oil and gas, mining and resource sectors. Pristine wetlands Two chains of wetlands run north-south through the City as part of the Beeliar Regional Park. These areas provide habitat for local flora and fauna and are a natural oasis within Cockburn. Many of the wetland areas have walking and cycling trails, BBQs, public amenities and playgrounds. Bibra Lake Regional Playground (pictured left) offers children a unique nature play facility. The playground contains Aboriginal story- telling and has disability access.
    [Show full text]
  • SUBURB BAILIFF PREFER'd DIST AMOUNT COURT KM Rate Per Kilometre 2.45 ALFRED COVE Fremantle Fre 8 19.60 ALEXANDER HEIGHTS
    SUBURB BAILIFF PREFER'D DIST AMOUNT COURT KM Rate Per Kilometre 2.45 ALFRED COVE Fremantle Fre 8 19.60 ALEXANDER HEIGHTS Joondalup Joo 16 39.20 ALKIMOS Joondalup Joo 14 34.30 AMARILLO Rockingham R/Ham 20 49.00 AMELIA HEIGHTS Perth Per 12 29.40 ANKETELL Rockingham R/Ham 18 44.10 APPLECROSS Fremantle Per 11 26.95 ARALUEN Armadale Arm 17 41.65 ARDROSS Fremantle Per 10 24.50 ARMADALE Armadale Arm 12 29.40 ASCOT Midland Per 13 31.85 ASHBY Joondalup Joo 12 29.40 ASHENDON Armadale Arm 33 80.85 ASHFIELD Midland Mid 8 19.60 ATTADALE Fremantle Fre 7 17.15 ATWELL Fremantle Fre 10 24.50 AUBIN GROVE Fremantle Fre 17 41.65 AVELEY Midland Mid 20 49.00 BALCATTA Perth Per 10 24.50 BALDIVIS Rockingham R/Ham 16 39.20 BALGA Perth Per 12 29.40 BALLAJURA Midland Mid 16 39.20 BANJUP Fremantle Arm 17 41.65 BANKSIA GROVE Joondalup Joo 10 24.50 BARTON’S MILL Midland Mid 39 95.55 BASKERVILLE Midland Mid 13 31.85 BASSENDEAN Midland Mid 6 14.70 SUBURB BAILIFF PREFER'D DIST AMOUNT COURT KM Rate Per Kilometre 2.45 BATEMAN Fremantle Fre 12 29.40 BAYSWATER Midland Per 13 31.85 BEACONSFIELD Fremantle Fre 3 7.35 BECKENHAM Armadale Per 6 14.70 BEDFORD Perth Per 6 14.70 BEDFORDALE Armadale Arm 18 44.10 BEECHBORO Midland Mid 15 36.75 BEECHINA Midland Mid 26 63.70 BEELIAR Fremantle Fre 12 29.40 BELDON Joondalup Joo 6 14.70 BELHUS Midland Mid 13 31.85 BELLEVUE Midland Mid 3 7.35 BELMONT Midland Per 13 31.85 BENNETT SPRINGS Midland Mid 15 36.75 BENTLEY Armadale Per 10 24.50 BERTRAM Rockingham R/Ham 13 31.85 BIBRA LAKE Fremantle Fre 10 24.50 BICKLEY Midland Mid 25 61.25 BICTON
    [Show full text]
  • ECM 9857885 V2 Media Release
    cockburn.wa.gov.au Media Release 15 October 2020 Dogs prohibited at Woodman Point beach from 21 October to protect nesting shorebirds, but more dog-friendly spaces planned Dogs will be prohibited at Woodman Point beach from 21 October, following Cockburn Council’s adoption of the Animal Management and Exercise Plan 2020-2025 (AMEP). Dogs will no longer be allowed at Woodman Point beach from Ammunition Jetty heading south around the Woodman Point headland to where the dog beach begins at Jervoise Bay. The AMEP still enables about 40 per cent of Cockburn’s coast to be accessible to dogs, plus the provision of more off-leash dog exercise areas at large public open spaces, and two new dog parks in the future During preparation of the AMEP, Council requested an independent Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The EIA found that continuing to allow dogs at the beach would adversely impact the area’s nesting shorebirds, including federally protected species that migrate annually from the northern hemisphere. The EIA found making the beach a ‘no dog’ area would provide a safe refuge with conservation benefits for vulnerable Fairy Terns, shorebirds, seabirds and other native species. Extensive public consultation during the Plan’s preparation also found the community overwhelmingly objected to the Woodman Point beach being accessible to dogs, due to concerns for the area’s shorebirds. A proposal for the beach to be accessible to dogs was also rejected by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Birdlife Australia, the Conservation Council of WA, Native ARC Inc, the Department of Local Government, Sport & Cultural Industries, and the Woodman Point Regional Park Community Advisory Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey Towards Facilitating Multiple-Use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II And
    A journey towards facilitating Multiple-use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II and III Background paper for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Prepared in consultation with the Multiple-use Support Team 2009 ISBN 1 921094 18 4 A Journey towards Facilitating Multiple-use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II and III Background Paper for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Initiated by Barb Green Prepared and developed by Barb Green, Geoff Botting, Dr Tom Rose and Officers of the Cockburn Sound Management Council – Department of Environment and Conservation for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Shop 1/ 15 Railway Terrace Rockingham Beach WA 6168 In consultation with the Cockburn Sound Management Council’s Multiple-use Support Team Dr Tom Rose – Council Coordinator Professor Kateryna Longley – Chair Mr Keith Tocas – Recreational Fishing Representative Mr John Smedley – Recreational Boating Representative Mr Bart Houwen – Community Representative Mr Gino Valenti – Fremantle Ports Representative Mr Andrew Hill – Department of Fisheries Representative Mr Tim Bray (in Andrew Hill’s absence) Mr Ian Briggs – Department of Industry and Resources Representative Dr John Keesing – CSIRO Marine Representative Dr Rod Lukatelich – Kwinana Industries Council Representatives and Mr Milan Vicentic – GIS Coordinator, Department of Environment and Conservation Mr Chris Coffey – Environment Officer, Cockburn Sound Management Council Ms Jessica Davis – Environment Officer, Cockburn Sound Management Council
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into the Port Coogee Development
    PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO THE PORT COOGEE DEVELOPMENT Report No. 6 36th Parliament 2003 PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE Published by the Legislative Assembly, Parliament of Western Australia, Perth, December 2003. Printed by the Government Printer, State Law Publisher, Western Australia. Public Accounts Committee Inquiry into the Port Coogee Development ISBN: 1 920830 20 0 (Series: Western Australia. Parliament. Legislative Assembly. Committees. Public Accounts Committee. Report 6) 328.365 Copies available from: State Law Publisher 10 William Street PERTH WA 6000 Telephone: (08) 9321 7688 Facsimile: (08) 9321 7536 Email: [email protected] Copies available on-line: www.parliament.wa.gov.au PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO THE PORT COOGEE DEVELOPMENT Report No. 6 Presented by: Mr J.B. D'Orazio, MLA Laid on the Table of the Legislative Assembly on 4 December 2003 PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEMBERS Chairman Mr J.B. D'Orazio, MLA Member for Ballajura Deputy Chairman Mr M.G. House, MLA Member for Stirling Members Mr J.L. Bradshaw, MLA Member for Murray-Wellington Mr A.J. Dean, MLA Member for Bunbury Mr M.P. Whitely, MLA Member for Roleystone (until 30.10.2003) Ms J.A. Radisich, MLA Member for Swan Hills (from 30.10.2003) COMMITTEE STAFF Principal Research Officer Ms Andrea McCallum, BA, B Juris, LL B, LL M Research Officer Mr Simon Kennedy, BA (Hons) COMMITTEE ADDRESS Public Accounts Committee Legislative Assembly Tel: (08) 9222 7494 Parliament House Fax: (08) 9222 7804 Harvest Terrace Email: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • 2004–05 Budget
    2004–05 BUDGET BUDGET STATEMENTS Volume 3 PRESENTED TO THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY ON 6 MAY 2004 Budget Paper No.2 2004–05 Budget Statements (Budget Paper No. 2 Volume 3) © Government of Western Australia Excerpts from this publication may be reproduced, with appropriate acknowledgement, as permitted under the Copyright Act. For further information please contact: Department of Treasury and Finance 197 St George’s Terrace Perth WA 6000 Telephone:+61 8 9222 9222 Facsimile: +61 8 9222 9117 Website: http://ourstatebudget.wa.gov.au Published May 2004 John A. Strijk, Government Printer ISSN 1448–2630 BUDGET 2004-05 BUDGET STATEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume Page Chapter 1: Consolidated Fund Expenditure Estimates ............... 1 1 Chapter 2: Net Appropriation Determinations ............................ 1 23 Chapter 3: Agency Information in Support of the Estimates ...... 1 33 PART 1 – PARLIAMENT Parliament .......................................................................................... 1 37 Parliamentary Commissioner for Administrative Investigations ....... 1 54 PART 2 - PREMIER; MINISTER FOR PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT; FEDERAL AFFAIRS; SCIENCE; CITIZENSHIP AND MULTICULTURAL INTERESTS Premier and Cabinet........................................................................... 1 67 Royal Commission Into Whether There Has Been Any Corrupt or Criminal Conduct by Western Australian Police Officers ........... 1 106 Anti-Corruption Commission............................................................. 1 110 Governor's Establishment..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Public Participation in the Management of a Contaminated Site in Western Australia
    Faculty of Humanities Curtin University Sustainable Policy Unit Citizens contesting science: a case study of public participation in the management of a contaminated site in Western Australia Kelly Elizabeth Duckworth A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Curtin University February 2016 Declaration To the best of my knowledge and belief this thesis contains no material previously published by any other person except where due acknowledgment has been made. This thesis contains no material that has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university. Signature: Date: February 2016 ABSTRACT This thesis addresses the problem of involving citizens in regulatory debates rich in the discourse of science. Through a detailed case study of the ANI-Bradken site redevelopment project, the public participatory practices within Western Australian environmental regulatory processes are scrutinised. From the perspective of a community group (the South Fremantle/Hamilton Hill Residents’ Association Inc.) contesting the redevelopment, the thesis examines the barriers to effective public participation using a theoretical framework developed within the sociology of scientific knowledge. The case study of the thesis documents the community group’s attempts to debate critical safety issues associated with a contaminated site redevelopment project near Fremantle, Western Australia (WA). The study draws attention to the influential role of scientific knowledge in environmental management and, specifically, in the management of contaminated sites. It also clarifies how, and why, regulatory authorities utilise scientific knowledge to influence the public participatory processes. The thesis argues that the regulatory application of scientific knowledge influences public participatory processes through two mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline North Coogee
    SHORELINE NORTH COOGEE RISE AND SHINE TO LIFE ON THE COAST Waking to a soft sea breeze, endless days soaking up the beach and watching the day fade into iconic sunsets; M/31 is your coastal calling. Set in the picturesque Shoreline precinct across from the beach and only minutes to the heart of Fremantle, M/31 is contemporary apartment living in a rare setting – where an urban life weaves together the coast and home. Whoever said you couldn’t have the best of both worlds? WORRIES WASH AWAY A soft breeze carrying salt-tinged air, bathed in golden light – there is something magically soothing about living along the West Australian coastline. WHERE SHORE MEETS STYLE Each space at M/31 is in careful consideration of its environment, with every emphasis placed on maximising its stunning natural light and vistas, whilst giving residents room to unwind in sheltered balconies and courtyards. Inspired by the textures of its surrounds, M/31’s interior brings these elements into a contemporary, open-plan setting. Tones of local woods, sands and flora have been woven into the finishings, with the selection of the warming Sun, calming Sand or moody Singe palettes complementing a uniquely coastal style. A LIFE OF VIBRANCY A well-rounded life is all about balance – where one can escape from stresses, but near to the pulse of places that colour the soul. NORTH COOGEE’S BRIGHT FUTURE An endless summer awaits at Shoreline. will entwine around a beachside plaza; Wander down M/31’s tree-lined boulevard, while parks and playgrounds will create an stretch out at the expansive parks across the active community centred around family road, or head down to the beach for endless and friends.
    [Show full text]