DOCSLIB.ORG

A Journey Towards Facilitating Multiple-Use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Journey Towards Facilitating Multiple-Use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II And A journey towards facilitating Multiple-use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II and III Background paper for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Prepared in consultation with the Multiple-use Support Team 2009 ISBN 1 921094 18 4 A Journey towards Facilitating Multiple-use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II and III Background Paper for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Initiated by Barb Green Prepared and developed by Barb Green, Geoff Botting, Dr Tom Rose and Officers of the Cockburn Sound Management Council – Department of Environment and Conservation for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Shop 1/ 15 Railway Terrace Rockingham Beach WA 6168 In consultation with the Cockburn Sound Management Council’s Multiple-use Support Team Dr Tom Rose – Council Coordinator Professor Kateryna Longley – Chair Mr Keith Tocas – Recreational Fishing Representative Mr John Smedley – Recreational Boating Representative Mr Bart Houwen – Community Representative Mr Gino Valenti – Fremantle Ports Representative Mr Andrew Hill – Department of Fisheries Representative Mr Tim Bray (in Andrew Hill’s absence) Mr Ian Briggs – Department of Industry and Resources Representative Dr John Keesing – CSIRO Marine Representative Dr Rod Lukatelich – Kwinana Industries Council Representatives and Mr Milan Vicentic – GIS Coordinator, Department of Environment and Conservation Mr Chris Coffey – Environment Officer, Cockburn Sound Management Council Ms Jessica Davis – Environment Officer, Cockburn Sound Management Council Ms Melissa Robins – Environment Officer, Cockburn Sound Management Council Citation Botting G.C., Green, B., Rose, T.H. 2009. ‘Sounding Out’ Published by Cockburn Sound Management Council. Department of Environment and Conservation. 228 pages. ISBN 1 921094 18 4 Acknowledgements: This document represents the cumulative stories, reports and two years is also fully acknowledged and appreciated, work done by numerous researchers, historians, fishermen, particularly contributions from Ms Jessica Davis and Ms boating users, community members and champions of Melissa Robbins. The Department of Environment and Cockburn Sound. Much of the document was initially Conservation GIS section provided invaluable expertise compiled by Barbara Green when working for Cockburn and assistance with mapping and spatial information. Sound Management Council (CSMC) and more recently by The authors wish to emphasise that the information CSMC Senior Environmental Officer, Geoffrey Botting and provided is a humble attempt to capture some of the Coordinator Dr Thomas Rose. The Chair of the Cockburn extensive and fascinating history as well as catalogue Sound Management Council, Professor Kateryna Longley the wide range of multiple uses of this remarkable provided key editorial review and suggestions while this marine embayment. It is hoped this document will be document was being finalised as did Mrs June Hutchison. used to help guide the CSMC and the wider community The CSMC Multiple-use Support Team (MuST) provided into ensuring that sustainable long-term future uses unpaid project direction, structure and key discussion to and management of Cockburn Sound are such that it help develop much the document. The contribution by the remains a healthy, fun, productive and valuable Perth full Cockburn Sound Management Council and staff over metropolitan waterway and environment for all. Contents 1. Setting the Scene – Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage and the Cockburn Sound Management Council ...... 1 2. Cockburn Sound Management Council Objective for the Multiple-use Framework ............................................ 3 3. Sounding Out – Part I, II & III Outline ...................................................................................................................... 4 Part I. A review of historical and current use, and administrative roles for Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage 1. Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage – A History of Multiple-use ............................................................. 7 1.0 Indigenous History .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Colonial Settlement ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Whaling and Sealing ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Jetty Structures ......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Ship Building and Repair ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 1.5 Light Industry – Owen Anchorage ......................................................................................................................................... 9 1.6 Heavy Industry – Cockburn Sound ........................................................................................................................................ 9 1.7 Wastewater Treatment, Re-use and Sewage Discharge ..................................................................................................... 10 1.8 Port Operations ...................................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.9 Defence of Australia .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 1.10 Power Supply ......................................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.11 Commercial and Recreational Fishing ................................................................................................................................. 12 1.12 Aquaculture ............................................................................................................................................................................ 13 1.13 Tourism .................................................................................................................................................................................. 13 1.14 Recreational Boating and Mooring ...................................................................................................................................... 14 1.15 Shore-initiated and Shore-based Recreation ........................................................................................................................ 15 1.16 Natural History Research and Pollution Management .......................................................................................... 15 2. Current Administrative Boundaries in Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage ................................................. 17 2.1 Cockburn Sound Management Council – Boundary ......................................................................................................... 17 2.2 Environmental Protection Authority – State Environmental (Cockburn Sound) Policy 2005 Area and Ecological Protection Areas ................................................................................................................................. 17 2.3 Fremantle Ports – Port Limits ............................................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Department of Defence – Naval Waters .............................................................................................................................. 17 2.5 Department of Fisheries – Aquaculture Leases ................................................................................................................... 17 2.6 Department for Planning and Infrastructure – Navigable Waters and Mooring Control Area ........................................ 18 2.7 Cockburn Cement Limited – Dredging Areas ..................................................................................................................... 18 2.8 Department of Environment and Conservation – Regional Parks ..................................................................................... 18 2.9 City of Cockburn, Town of Kwinana & City of Rockingham – Foreshore Reserves ...................................................... 18 2.10 Industry Tenure of Foreshore and Beaches ........................................................................................................... 19 Sounding Out – a way forward iii Part II. A review of written, spatial, verbal and photographic information for Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage (1900–2008) 1. Link to Environmental Management Plan Objective and Recommendation ....................................................... 23 2. Method for Information Collection ........................................................................................................................... 24 2.1 Resourcing ............................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Perth Freight Link: Facts and Fiction Prepared by Peter Newman and Philip Jennings for the Beeliar Group – Professors for Environmental Responsibility
    For Release 8 Feb 2017 The Perth Freight Link: Facts and Fiction Prepared by Peter Newman and Philip Jennings for The Beeliar Group – Professors for Environmental Responsibility The supporters of Roe 8 and the Perth Freight Link (PFL) have been spreading misinformation and half truths about the developments. Their aim is to discredit alternatives by the selective use of the facts. This analysis of the Roe 8 and PFL myths provides a more complete picture. Myth 1: The PFL has been on the books for 60 years and no one objected until recently. The PFL was a Prime Minister Abbott “Captain’s Call” presented to the former Transport Minister, Dean Nalder, at a meeting in Canberra in early 2015, along with similar highly controversial roads in Melbourne and Sydney. The Melbourne East-West Link was rejected by the Victorian people at their last election. It is extremely unusual to have a road project proposed by a Commonwealth politician and it has disrupted all planning processes since it was dropped on Perth without any history or warning. The PFL is still a vague proposal and the detailed design has never been released publicly or assessed by the EPA. Roe 8 was included in the Metropolitan Region Scheme in 1963 without any public consultation or environmental impact assessment as part of a ring road bringing traffic to the coast between North Coogee and South Beach and then north to Fremantle. The Cockburn Wetlands Study of 1975 first suggested that the road should not proceed. The first environmental assessment was carried out by the EPA in 1978 and it recommended in its System Six report in 1980 that a new route be found because the proposed route was environmentally unacceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • ECM 5553401 V1 North Coogee Foreshore Management Plan
    NORTH COOGEE FORESHORE MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by: Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd Document Status Reviewer Approved for Issue Rev. No. Author Name Signature Name Signature Date 1 DK,MW, SB DK 2 DK,MW, SB MW 3 DK,MW, SB AW MW 4 MW DK DK 27/3/07 5 MW DK DK 4/5/07 6 MW 4/5/07 FINAL DRAFT MW DK FINAL MW DK DK 20/11/07 FINAL rev 1 PJ MW MW 19/06/08 FINAL rev 2 PJ MW MW 27/06/08 FINAL rev 3 PJ MW MW 26/03/09 5638-1338-07R March, 2009 Document Set ID: 5553401 Version: 1, Version Date: 03/02/2017 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT FOR: North Coogee Foreshore Management Plan Copyright © 1987-2009 Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd ABN 70 070 128 675 Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), the whole or any part of this report may not be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owner, Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd. This includes microcopying, photocopying or recording of any parts of the report. Neither may the information contained in this report be reproduced, transmitted or stored electronically in any form, such as in a retrieval system, without the specific written permission of Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd. Limitations Statement This report has been exclusively drafted for the needs of STOCKLAND & LANDCORP in conjunction with the CITY OF COCKBURN. No express or implied warranties are made by Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd regarding the research findings and data contained in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation Times
    _____________________________________ The PRESERVATION TIMES AN ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK NEWSLETTER Volume 22 Issue 1 Autumn 2016 I have to Did you find return home for the anything to eat or a Cocky census. bed for the night ? No! I’m heading back down south to stay with my cousin. I’d rather be a refugee than starve to death. A PEEL PRESERVATION GROUP PUBLICATION Thank you to: Shirley Joiner, Linda Thorpe and our group members for there submissions and articles and support . Regards Coral. Be Published with PPG Please keep PPG members informed of Peel Preservation Group has finalised the Gift Membership. issues, wins and ideas, poems, stories This available to be purchased and given as a gift on and drawings etc. through our newsletter. special occasions. The next edition will be published in Summer This is a great way to share the Preservation Times and The deadline for this edition will be group membership with friends, family and colleagues. To purchase a Certificate contact the office - Mondays is 15th June 2016 the office open day at the PPG office. We have decided to make Coffee Mornings at the Office on Email contributions to The office: Mondays. This will hopefully make Mondays catch-up days with committee members and assist with the manning of the office. [email protected] Hope to see you at the Office on Monday mornings in the near future. The Next Coffee Gathering PPG is on the look out for suitable at Mandurah Quays sponsors who would like to pay for some on Sunday 3rd April. advertising space in our magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Swamp : Walking the Wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain
    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 2012 Swamp : walking the wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain ; and with the exegesis, A walk in the anthropocene: homesickness and the walker-writer Anandashila Saraswati Edith Cowan University Recommended Citation Saraswati, A. (2012). Swamp : walking the wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain ; and with the exegesis, A walk in the anthropocene: homesickness and the walker-writer. Retrieved from https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/588 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/588 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. USE OF THESIS This copy is the property of Edith Cowan University. However, the literary rights of the author must also be respected. If any passage from this thesis is quoted or closely paraphrased in a paper of written work prepared by the user, the source of the passage must be acknowledged in the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Research
    RESIDENTIAL RESEARCH Greater Perth higher density residential development site sales tallied $213.36 million in the year ending 31 August 2015. Despite a slowdown in residential $20.50 million; both projects being development sites sales across Greater marketed in 2015. Other recent major site In the past year, by value, 64.6% Perth, the construction phase is active sales, with potential for higher density in of Greater Perth development with many projects kicking-off earlier Greater Perth, have been listed in Table 1 sites were sold to foreign than scheduled due to the majority of on page 4. investors. apartments selling off-the-plan in the Inner and Middle Suburbs regions. Over the two years to the end of August 2015, the Inner Suburbs region recorded Foreign investors have a the highest volume of residential proposed $1.32 billion Sales Volume worth of development site sales at $275.79 million, residential developments in the whilst the Perth CBD saw $32.90 million pipeline in WA. Sales turnover of major sites, likely for higher density development in Greater in sales. The Middle Suburbs region, Perth, grew substantially over the three resulted in sales in the order of $147.11 Lone person households are years to 31 August 2014 to stand at million over the same time. projected to have the highest $322.23 million, as shown in Figure 1. growth at 3.0% per annum over However, the twelve months to the end There are significant infrastructure the next twenty years of August 2015, recorded $213.36 million projects currently under construction that worth of transacted sales, reflecting the will greatly benefit not only these regions, weaker buyer sentiment in the wider but the Greater Perth area, including Strong pipeline of committed Perth property market.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission of Form BA20 Notice of Consent to the Department of Housing
    Submission of Form BA20 Notice of Consent to the Department of Housing The following contact details should be used in relation to obtaining written consent from the Department of Housing as the adjoining property owner along a shared property boundary. 1. Where the Department of Housing property is occupied or construction has been completed the attached list of suburbs should be used to identify the Regional Office responsible for that suburb. The Notice of Consent Form BA20 and relevant documentation should be submitted to the Regional Manager using the details provided for that particular office. 2. Where construction has not yet commenced on the Department of Housing property or where construction is still in progress then the Notice of Consent Form BA20 and relevant documentation should be submitted to the Manager Professional Services using the details provided. NOTE – Approval will be delayed if the Notice of Consent Form BA20 and relevant documentation is not submitted to the correct processing area.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedgelands in Holocene Dune Swales Recovery Plan
    INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN NO. 314 SEDGELANDS IN HOLOCENE DUNE SWALES RECOVERY PLAN September 2011 Department of Environment and Conservation Species and Communities Branch Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA, 6983 FOREWORD Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) Policy Statements Nos 44 and 50. IRPs outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. DEC is committed to ensuring that critically endangered ecological communities are conserved through the preparation and implementation of Recovery Plans or Interim Recovery Plans and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible and always within one year of endorsement of that rank by DEC’s Director of Nature Conservation. This Interim Recovery Plan will operate from September 2011 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the community is still listed as critically endangered after five years, the need for an updated plan will be evaluated. The provision of funds identified in this Interim Recovery Plan is dependent on budgetary and other constraints affecting DEC, as well as the need to address other priorities. Information in this IRP was accurate at September 2011. This interim recovery plan replaces plan number 110 Sedgelands in Holocene dune swales 2002-2007 by V. English, J. Blyth, N. Gibson, D. Pember, J. Davis, J. Tucker, P. Jennings and B. Walker. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This interim recovery plan was prepared by Gemma Grigg and Valerie English.
    [Show full text]
  • A Petition Into the Proposed Marina at Point Peron
    THIRTY -SEVENTH PARLIAMENT REPORT 7 STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS A PETITION INTO THE PROPOSED MARINA AT POINT PERON Presented by Hon Louise Pratt MLC (Chairman) December 2006 STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS Date first appointed: 17 August 2005 Terms of Reference: The following is an extract from Schedule 1 of the Legislative Council Standing Orders: “1. Environment and Public Affairs Committee 1.1 An Environment and Public Affairs Committee is established. 1.2 The Committee consists of 5 members. 1.3 The functions of the Committee are to inquire into and report on - (a) any public or private policy, practice, scheme, arrangement, or project whose implementation, or intended implementation, within the limits of the State is affecting, or may affect, the environment; (b) any bill referred by the House; and (c) petitions. 1.4 The Committee, where relevant and appropriate, is to assess the merit of matters or issues arising from an inquiry in accordance with the principles of ecologically sustainable development and the minimisation of harm to the environment. 1.5 The Committee may refer a petition to another committee where the subject matter of the petition is within the competence of that committee. 1.6 In this order “environment” has the meaning assigned to it under section 3(1), (2) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 .” Members as at the time of this inquiry: Hon Louise Pratt MLC (Chairman) Hon Paul Llewellyn MLC Hon Bruce Donaldson MLC (Deputy Hon Robyn McSweeney MLC Chairman) Hon Kate Doust MLC Staff as at the time of this inquiry: Mark Warner, Committee Clerk Vincent Cusack, Advisory Officer (General) Address: Parliament House, Perth WA 6000, Telephone (08) 9222 7222 [email protected] Website: http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au ISBN 1 921243 04 X Government Response This Report is subject to Standing Order 337: After tabling, the Clerk shall send a copy of a report recommending action by, or seeking a response from, the Government to the responsible Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-11-25 QWON Power Stations
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL C1379 QUESTION WITHOUT NOTICE (Of which some notice has been given) Tuesday, 25 November 2014 Hon Robin Chapple to the Leader ofthe House representing the Minister for Energy. Please provide a summary of all active power stations in Western Australia, including: age; capacity profile; fuel and/or mine type; number of employees; whether it is on or off the grid; and the closure schedule. I thankthe Hon. Member for some notice of this question. I table the attached document. The Public Utilities Office has relied on the Independent Market Operator for data concerning generators on the SWIS and has reported the maximum sent out capacity offered by these facilities into the Balancing Market, as of 25 November 2014. These figures may differ slightly from the number of capacity credits awarded and from facility nameplate capacity owing to factors including parasitic load and ambient temperature. For NWIS and NIS facilities, various sources have been used as there is no single definitive list of facilities. The nature of mining operations has not been investigated. The Public Utilities Office does not have access to data on the number of employees or on the closure schedule of power stations. The expected plant life of power stations is variable, a function of maintenance regimes and commercial considerations. ATTACHMENT TO QWN C1379 . 'I . " ~ -1J&1t~-n i ~,'l;(, : 'C' 4\", lTt ~A','~:'l';"(~.i~ffil!. " l]f,:,gl '~. l) , '. lifP'\1 ~, , •. 'fg~~t:t.: :' (~~.~:~n.', . ~ j - llll' ~!l!i:jliiW~tlilit~r~QJ\l1~~t~ii~Sys:t~m;(~~),~'•.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beeliar Group Speaks Outa
    Beeliar Group Statement 1, Revision 1 Urgent need for action: the Beeliar Group speaks outa The Beeliar Group takes a strong stand against the destruction of precious West Australian wetlands and woodlands (the Beeliar Regional Park), and calls for an immediate halt to work on Roe 8, a major highway development that will traverse them. In so doing, we propose an alternative long-term agenda. Our rationale is set out below. 1. Valuable ecological communities, fauna and flora are subordinated to short-term political gain and vested interests. Roe 8 fragments one of the best remaining patches of Banksia woodland left in the Swan coastal region, which is part of an internationally recognised biodiversity hotspot. In September 2016, the Banksia Woodlands of the Swan Coastal Plain was listed as an endangered ecological community in accordance with the Commonwealth’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999). The Commonwealth document, Banksia Woodlands of the Swan Coastal Plain: a nationally protected ecological community, drew attention to the importance of the area and the dangers of fragmentation: “[Banksia woodland] was once common and formed an almost continuous band of large bushland patches around Perth and other near coastal areas, but has been lost by almost 60% overall, with most remaining patches small in size. This fragmentation is leading to the decline of many plants, animals and ecosystem functions. Therefore, it is very important to protect, manage and restore the best surviving remnants for future generations.1
    [Show full text]
  • Hon Daniel James Caddy, MLC (Member for North Metropolitan)
    PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA INAUGURAL SPEECH Hon Daniel James Caddy, MLC (Member for North Metropolitan) Legislative Council Address-in-Reply Tuesday, 25 May 2021 Reprinted from Hansard Legislative Council Tuesday, 25 May 2021 ____________ ADDRESS-IN-REPLY Motion Resumed from 13 May on the following motion moved by Hon Pierre Yang — That the following address be presented to His Excellency the Honourable Kim Beazley, Companion of the Order of Australia, Governor in and over the state of Western Australia and its dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia — May it please Your Excellency: We, the members of the Legislative Council of the Parliament of Western Australia in Parliament assembled, beg to express our loyalty to our most gracious sovereign and thank Your Excellency for the speech you have been pleased to deliver to Parliament. HON DAN CADDY (North Metropolitan) [5.03 pm]: It is important to me that the first words I utter in this place are to acknowledge the traditional owners of the land on which this place stands, the Whadjuk people of the proud Noongar nation. I pay my respects to their elders past, present and emerging. This land is Whadjuk boodja—always was and always will be. I shared a flight to Canberra with the Governor nearly 15 years ago. We sat, just the two of us, at a table on the government jet. It was an incredible conversation. Then later that year, I was dropping something off at his office at Parliament House in Canberra and I asked him a simple question about his time in politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Answers to Questions Prior to Hearing
    Hon Mike Nahan MLA Treasurer; Minister for Energy; Citizenship and Multicultural Interests Ourref: 48-13528; 48-13527 Hon Ken Travers MLC Chairman Estimates and Financial Operations Committee Parliament House PERTH WA 6000 Attn: Mr Mark Warner Committee Clerk Dear Mr Travers QUESTIONS PRIOR TO 2014-15 ANNUAL REPORT HEARINGS - SYNERGY AND HORIZON POWER In response to the Committee's letter of 20 October 2015, please find attached responses to the questions prior to hearing, in respect of Synergy and Horizon Power's 2014-15 annual report. Yours sincerely DR MIKE NAHAN MLA TREASURER Att. CC: Hon Peter Collier MLC Minister representing the Minister for Energy in the Legislative Council 1 9 NOV 2015 Level 13, Dumas House, 2 Havelock Street, West Perth, Western Australia 6005 Telephone: +61 8 6552 5700 Facsimile: +61 8 6552 5701 Email: [email protected] ESTIMATES AND FINANCIAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE 2014/15 ANNUAL REPORT HEARINGS QUESTIONS PRIOR TO HEARING Synergy Annual Report 2014/15 Hon Robin Chappie asked: 1) Page 5 under "Our Business," I ask: a) How many people are employed at each of your nine power stations? Answer: Employees (2014-15) Cockbum Power Station 19 Kalgoorlie Gas Turbine Mungarra Gas Turbine 5 Pinjar Power Station Kwinana Power Station (includes Kwinana Gas Turbines) 11 Geraldton Gas Turbine 0 Worsley (South West Co-Generation Joint Venture) 0 (operated by Worsley Alumina) Muja Power Station 337 Collie Power Station 1 FTE + contractors as required. How many people are employed at each of your nine wind farms? Answer: Employees (2014-15) Albany Wind Farm Bremer Bay Wind-Diesel System 4 Esperance Wind Farms Hopetoun Wind-Diesel System Coral Bay Wind-Diesel System 2 Denham Wind-Diesel System 2 Kalbarri Wind Farm 1 Mumbida Wind Farm 6 How many people are employed at your one solar farm? Answer: Employees (2014-15) Greenough River Solar Farm 1.5 2) Page 21 under "Delivering energy" you describe two station transformers failing and a partial cooling tower collapse at Muja Power Station, I ask: a) Have these issues been rectified? Answer: Yes.
    [Show full text]