DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Review New Munster Pump Station and Bibra Lake Main Sewer Extension

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Review New Munster Pump Station and Bibra Lake Main Sewer Extension New Munster Pump Station and Bibra Lake Main Sewer Extension Environmental Review FINAL REPORT December 1998 628.2(941 .2) GUT 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Copy A 981043/1 WAT E R Department of Environmental Protection Library CORPORATION LIBRARY DEPARTMENT OF ENVR0NMENTAL PROTECTION Invitation to make a submission WEThALIA SQUARE 141 Si GEORGES TERRACE, PERTH The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) invites people to make a submission on this proposal. The Water Corporation proposes to expand its sewage pumping capacity at Munster by constructing another pump station (No.3) and the extension of the Bibra Lake main sewer. In accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, a PER has been prepared which describes this proposal and its likely effects on the environment. The PER is available for a public review period of 8 weeks from 4th January 1999 closing on 1st March 1999. Comments from government agencies and from the public will help the EPA to prepare an assessment report in which it will make recommendations to government. Why write a submission? A submission is a way to provide information, express your opinion and put forward your suggested course of action - including any alternative approach. It is useful if you indicate any suggestions you have to improve the proposal. All submissions received by the EPA will be acknowledged. Submissions will be treated as public documents unless provided and received in confidence subject to the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act, and may be quoted in full or in part in the EPA's report. Why not join a group? If you prefer not to write your own comments, it may be worthwhile joining with a group interested in making a submission on similar issues. Joint submissions may help to reduce the workload for an individual or group, as well as increase the pool of ideas and information. If you form a small group (up to 10 people) please indicate all the names of the participants. If your group is larger, please indicate how many people your submission represents. Developing a submission You may agree or disagree with, or comment on, the general issues discussed in the [PER] or the specific proposals. It helps if you give reasons for your conclusions, supported by relevant data. You may make an important contribution by suggesting ways to make the proposal more environmentally acceptable. When making comments on specific elements of the PER: clearly state your point of view; indicate the source of your information or argument if this is applicable; and suggest recommendations, safeguards or alternatives. N:\61 1\600939\WP\32218.doc Points to keep in mind By keeping the following points in mind, you will make it easier for your submission to be analysed: attempt to list points so that issues raised are clear; a summary of your submission is helpful; refer each point to the appropriate section, chapter or recommendation in the PER; if you discuss different sections of the PER, keep them distinct and separate, so there is no confusion as to which section you are considering; attach any factual information you may wish to provide and give details of the source; and make sure your information is accurate. Remember to include: your name; address; date; and whether you want your submission to be confidential. The closing date for submissions is : 1St March 1999 Submissions should be addressed to: The Environmental Protection Authority Westralia Square 141 St George's Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Attention : Wes Horwood N:\61 1 \600939\WP\322 1 8.doc New Munster Pump Station and Public Environmental Review Bibra Lake Main Sewer Extension FINAL 22/12/98 Gutteridge Haskins & Davey Pty Ltd ACN 008 488 373 GHD House 239 Adelaide Tce Perth WA 6004 P0 Box Y3106 Perth WA 6832 Australia Telephone:61 8 9429 6666 Facsimile: 61 8 9429 6555 © Gutteridge Haskins & Davey Pty Ltd 1998 This document is and shall remain the property of Gutteridge Haskins & Davey Pty Ltd. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. Rev Author Reviewer Approved for Issue No. Name Signature Date U M Goldstone D Boland D Boland 01\12\98 1 M Goldstone D Boland D Boland 08\12\98 2 M Goldstone D Boland 3 M Goldstone D BoIe' Document Number; 10195 New' Job Number; 611/600939/00 New Munster Pump Station and Public Environmental Review Bibra Lake Main Sewer Extension FINAL 22/12/98 Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................I Background and Proposal Justification ...................................6 2.1 The Need for Ocean Disposal . ............................................................... 6 2.2 The need for large Wastewater Treatment Plants ................................8 2.3 The need for additional wastewater pumping capacity at Munster.. 10 Options for extending the Perth South Reticulation Sewerage System. ......................................................................................... 13 3.1 Alignments Avoiding the System 6 Areas .......................................... 13 3.2 Additional Pumping capacity on Mayor Road with Pressure Main across the Wetland..................................................................................... 13 3.3 Aligning the Extension to the Main Sewer along the Proposed Beeliar DriveExtension........................................................................................... 14 3.4 Options Leading to a Wetland Crossing North of Lake Coogee ....... 14 3.5 Selection of the Preferred Option........................................................ 19 3.5. lEn gineering Risk Assessment Workshop......................................... 19 3.5.2 Community Meetings....................................................................... 19 3.6Community Feedback............................................................................ 19 3.7 Environmental Risk Assessment Workshop ...................................... 20 3.8 The Preferred Option............................................................................ 20 3.8.1 Sewer alignment.............................................................................. 20 3.8.2 Pump Station Layout....................................................................... 23 3.8.3 Overflow from the Pump Station...................................................... 25 3.8.4 Enclosed Storage............................................................................ 25 3.8.5 Open Storage.................................................................................. 26 3.8.6 Emergency Overflow ....................................................................... 26 EPA Guidelines ........................................................................28 Existing Environment ...............................................................32 5.1 Physico-chemical Environment...........................................................32 5.1.1 Meteorology .............................................. ..................................... 32 5.1.2 Topography.....................................................................................32 5.1.3 Geology ........................................................................................... 33 5.1.4 Groundwater Flow Systems ............................................................. 35 5.1.5 Salt Water/Fresh Water Interface....................................................37 5.1.6 Regional and Local Water Quality...................................................37 5.1.7 Groundwater/Surface Water Interactions.........................................39 Document Number. 10195 New Munster Pump Station and Bibra Lake Main Sewer Extension Job Number: 611/600939/00 Public Environmental Review New Munster Pump Station and Public Environmental Review Bibra Lake Main Sewer Extension FINAL 22/12/98 5.1.8 Chemical Analyses.......................................................................... 39 5.1.9 Chemical Analysis Results.............................................................. 40 5.2 Contaminated Site Assessment........................................................... 43 5.3 Biological Environment........................................................................ 48 5.3.1 Vegetation........................................................................................ 48 5.3.2 Floristic Survey................................................................................ 51 5.3.3 Flora................................................................................................ 52 5.3.4 Bush/and Condition ......................................................................... 54 5.3.5 Fauna and Habitats ......................................................................... 56 5.3.6 Lake Coogee................................................................................... 58 5.4 Hydrological Connectivity.................................................................... 61 Natural Heritage .......................................................................64 6.1Statement of Significance ....................................................................64 6.2 Description of Beeliar wetlands...........................................................65 6.3 Western chain areas .............................................................................. 65 6.4 Condition and Integrity.........................................................................66
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preservation Times
    _____________________________________ The PRESERVATION TIMES AN ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK NEWSLETTER Volume 22 Issue 1 Autumn 2016 I have to Did you find return home for the anything to eat or a Cocky census. bed for the night ? No! I’m heading back down south to stay with my cousin. I’d rather be a refugee than starve to death. A PEEL PRESERVATION GROUP PUBLICATION Thank you to: Shirley Joiner, Linda Thorpe and our group members for there submissions and articles and support . Regards Coral. Be Published with PPG Please keep PPG members informed of Peel Preservation Group has finalised the Gift Membership. issues, wins and ideas, poems, stories This available to be purchased and given as a gift on and drawings etc. through our newsletter. special occasions. The next edition will be published in Summer This is a great way to share the Preservation Times and The deadline for this edition will be group membership with friends, family and colleagues. To purchase a Certificate contact the office - Mondays is 15th June 2016 the office open day at the PPG office. We have decided to make Coffee Mornings at the Office on Email contributions to The office: Mondays. This will hopefully make Mondays catch-up days with committee members and assist with the manning of the office. [email protected] Hope to see you at the Office on Monday mornings in the near future. The Next Coffee Gathering PPG is on the look out for suitable at Mandurah Quays sponsors who would like to pay for some on Sunday 3rd April. advertising space in our magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Swamp : Walking the Wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain
    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 2012 Swamp : walking the wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain ; and with the exegesis, A walk in the anthropocene: homesickness and the walker-writer Anandashila Saraswati Edith Cowan University Recommended Citation Saraswati, A. (2012). Swamp : walking the wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain ; and with the exegesis, A walk in the anthropocene: homesickness and the walker-writer. Retrieved from https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/588 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/588 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. USE OF THESIS This copy is the property of Edith Cowan University. However, the literary rights of the author must also be respected. If any passage from this thesis is quoted or closely paraphrased in a paper of written work prepared by the user, the source of the passage must be acknowledged in the work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beeliar Group Speaks Outa
    Beeliar Group Statement 1, Revision 1 Urgent need for action: the Beeliar Group speaks outa The Beeliar Group takes a strong stand against the destruction of precious West Australian wetlands and woodlands (the Beeliar Regional Park), and calls for an immediate halt to work on Roe 8, a major highway development that will traverse them. In so doing, we propose an alternative long-term agenda. Our rationale is set out below. 1. Valuable ecological communities, fauna and flora are subordinated to short-term political gain and vested interests. Roe 8 fragments one of the best remaining patches of Banksia woodland left in the Swan coastal region, which is part of an internationally recognised biodiversity hotspot. In September 2016, the Banksia Woodlands of the Swan Coastal Plain was listed as an endangered ecological community in accordance with the Commonwealth’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999). The Commonwealth document, Banksia Woodlands of the Swan Coastal Plain: a nationally protected ecological community, drew attention to the importance of the area and the dangers of fragmentation: “[Banksia woodland] was once common and formed an almost continuous band of large bushland patches around Perth and other near coastal areas, but has been lost by almost 60% overall, with most remaining patches small in size. This fragmentation is leading to the decline of many plants, animals and ecosystem functions. Therefore, it is very important to protect, manage and restore the best surviving remnants for future generations.1
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey Towards Facilitating Multiple-Use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II And
    A journey towards facilitating Multiple-use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II and III Background paper for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Prepared in consultation with the Multiple-use Support Team 2009 ISBN 1 921094 18 4 A Journey towards Facilitating Multiple-use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II and III Background Paper for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Initiated by Barb Green Prepared and developed by Barb Green, Geoff Botting, Dr Tom Rose and Officers of the Cockburn Sound Management Council – Department of Environment and Conservation for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Shop 1/ 15 Railway Terrace Rockingham Beach WA 6168 In consultation with the Cockburn Sound Management Council’s Multiple-use Support Team Dr Tom Rose – Council Coordinator Professor Kateryna Longley – Chair Mr Keith Tocas – Recreational Fishing Representative Mr John Smedley – Recreational Boating Representative Mr Bart Houwen – Community Representative Mr Gino Valenti – Fremantle Ports Representative Mr Andrew Hill – Department of Fisheries Representative Mr Tim Bray (in Andrew Hill’s absence) Mr Ian Briggs – Department of Industry and Resources Representative Dr John Keesing – CSIRO Marine Representative Dr Rod Lukatelich – Kwinana Industries Council Representatives and Mr Milan Vicentic – GIS Coordinator, Department of Environment and Conservation Mr Chris Coffey – Environment Officer, Cockburn Sound Management Council Ms Jessica Davis – Environment Officer, Cockburn Sound Management Council
    [Show full text]
  • Hon Daniel James Caddy, MLC (Member for North Metropolitan)
    PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA INAUGURAL SPEECH Hon Daniel James Caddy, MLC (Member for North Metropolitan) Legislative Council Address-in-Reply Tuesday, 25 May 2021 Reprinted from Hansard Legislative Council Tuesday, 25 May 2021 ____________ ADDRESS-IN-REPLY Motion Resumed from 13 May on the following motion moved by Hon Pierre Yang — That the following address be presented to His Excellency the Honourable Kim Beazley, Companion of the Order of Australia, Governor in and over the state of Western Australia and its dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia — May it please Your Excellency: We, the members of the Legislative Council of the Parliament of Western Australia in Parliament assembled, beg to express our loyalty to our most gracious sovereign and thank Your Excellency for the speech you have been pleased to deliver to Parliament. HON DAN CADDY (North Metropolitan) [5.03 pm]: It is important to me that the first words I utter in this place are to acknowledge the traditional owners of the land on which this place stands, the Whadjuk people of the proud Noongar nation. I pay my respects to their elders past, present and emerging. This land is Whadjuk boodja—always was and always will be. I shared a flight to Canberra with the Governor nearly 15 years ago. We sat, just the two of us, at a table on the government jet. It was an incredible conversation. Then later that year, I was dropping something off at his office at Parliament House in Canberra and I asked him a simple question about his time in politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Cockburn Sound Management Council
    COCKBURN SOUND MANAGEMENT COUNCIL THE STATE OF COCKBURN SOUND: A PRESSURE-STATE-RESPONSE REPORT Prepared for: COCKBURN SOUND MANAGEMENT COUNCIL Prepared by: D.A. LORD & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD In association with: PPK ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE PTY LTD JUNE 2001 REPORT NO. 01/187/1 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY __________________________________________________ v 1. INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________________ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ___________________________________________________________________ 1 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF COCKBURN SOUND _________________________________ 2 1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT APPROACH FOR COCKBURN SOUND _______________ 5 1.4 THIS DOCUMENT _________________________________________________________________ 7 2. MARINE COMPONENT __________________________________________________ 9 2.1 REGIONAL CONTEXT _____________________________________________________________ 9 2.2 ECOSYSTEM OVERVIEW __________________________________________________________ 9 2.3 STATE OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT ___________________________________________ 10 2.3.1 Water movement in the Sound ____________________________________________________ 10 2.3.2 Coastal processes _____________________________________________________________ 18 2.3.3 Water quality _________________________________________________________________ 22 2.3.4 Marine sediments______________________________________________________________ 29 2.3.5 Marine flora__________________________________________________________________ 32 2.3.6 Marine fauna _________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • From Perth's Lost Swamps to the Beeliar Wetlands
    Coolabah, No. 24&25, 2018, ISSN 1988-5946, Observatori: Centre d’Estudis Australians i Transnacionals / Observatory: Australian and Transnational Studies Centre, Universitat de Barcelona Reimagining the cultural significance of wetlands: From Perth’s lost swamps to the Beeliar Wetlands. Danielle Brady Edith Cowan University [email protected] Jeffrey Murray Australian Army Copyright©2018 Danielle Brady & Jeffrey Murray. This text may be archived and redistributed both in electronic form and in hard copy, provided that the author and journal are properly cited and no fee is charged, in accordance with our Creative Commons Licence. Abstract: The history of Perth, Western Australia, has been characterised by the incremental loss of its wetlands. While disputes about wetlands are often framed solely in terms of the environment, they are places of cultural significance too. The extensive wetlands of central Perth, food gathering and meeting places for Noongar people are now expunged from the landscape. Urban dwellers of Perth are largely unaware that the seasonal lakes and wetlands of the centre of the city were the larders, gardens, hideouts, dumps and playgrounds of previous generations; both Noongar and Settler. The loss of social memory of these lost cultural/natural places entails the framing of wetlands as aberrant and continues to influence Perth’s development and the sense of place of its inhabitants. Reimagining Perth’s Lost Wetlands was a project which attempted to reimagine the pre-colonial landscape using archival material. Reimagining the past allows connections to be made to the last remaining wetlands in the wider metropolitan area. The fight to save the Beeliar Wetlands in southern suburban Perth as a cultural/natural place illustrates the changing value of wetlands and the laying down of social memories of place.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into the Decision to Commit Funding to the Perth Freight Link Project
    North Lake Residents Submission Inquiry into the decision to commit funding to the Perth Freight Link project Proposed Roe Highway Extension Road Reserve through North & Bibra Lakes August 2015 Committee Secretary Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Australia 20th August 2015 RE: Inquiry into the decision to commit funding to the Perth Freight Link project: Roe Highway Stage 8 extension / Kwinana Freeway to Stock Road, WA. Dear Mr. Watling, The North Lake Residents are opposed to any form of Roe Highway extension through North Lake and Bibra Lake, and the following key points of this submission should be considered in relation to this inquiry. We also ask that the committee investigate why Commonwealth funding has already been allocated to the Perth Freight Link stage 1 (Roe Highway Stage 8), prior to Federal environmental approval under the EPBC act. This stage of the freight link, clearly desecrates and violates the environmental and indigenous cultural significance of North and Bibra Lakes. Our website www.savenorthlake.com.au also forms part of this submission as it contains relevant government and community reports, videos, photos and information that support the case for the protection of this environmentally significant and cultural heritage area. The website acts as a ‘library’ to which reports referenced in this submission can be viewed or downloaded. We request that committee visit our website before reading this submission and view the short videos in the video tab www.savenorthlake.com.au/videos.shtml The videos highlight the activities and events that have occurred there, including the community and Indigenous opposition to the Proposed Roe Highway extension through North Lake and Bibra Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision to Commit Funding to the Perth Freight Link Project
    Chapter 4 Concerns raised by local governments and communities 4.1 This chapter discusses concerns about the Perth Freight Link raised by local governments and communities, and in particular addresses evidence concerning: • insufficient consultation on the project by the federal and state governments, especially with local governments, industry representatives, and the communities who would be affected the most; • the damage the Roe 8 extension could cause to local environmental, Indigenous and other heritage sites, as well as apparent irregularities in the overturning of previous environmental and heritage assessments; and • negative effects the project may have on local communities; and • some negative impacts the Freight Link would have for residents and businesses of Fremantle. Lack of consultation 4.2 The committee received evidence suggesting that the Commonwealth and state governments did not undertake appropriate or sufficient consultation about the Perth Freight Link with local governments, industry stakeholders and the communities who would be affected the most by the project. Local government and industry stakeholders 4.3 The Mayors of Fremantle, East Fremantle and Cockburn all told the committee their communities would be negatively affected by the Freight Link. All agreed that they first heard of the project through the media and had no contact with Main Roads WA until well after the Budget announcement had been made.1 Councillor Logan Howlett, Mayor of the City of Cockburn, reflected that the Freight Link was presented by the state government as the only potential option for transport infrastructure to support Fremantle Port: …the level of public consultation with regard to Roe 8 focused only on one option and that was to build Roe 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Christmas Issue 2019
    Friends of Mandurah Community Museum Newsletter Christmas Issue 2019 Elizabeth Thomas nee Cooper. Editors Remarks. Not that I really need the space as Joseph Cooper arrived in Fremantle aboard The Warrior my handiwork fills the newsletter. However it might be in March 1830 with his wife Elizabeth (35 years old) and useful to look at what has ‘trended’ this year. their children, Elizabeth (7 maybe 9), Rebecca (5), Over a full year we have featured Coastal Trading, with Joseph (3) and Mary Ann (6 months). several significant Mandurah Pioneer families featuring The young Elizabeth known as Betsy, was to marry Cap- extensively. We probably could go on with this series as tain John Thomas in 1841. The couple went on to be- it is clear that pioneers who came to Mandurah, also come business owners in Fremantle where they ran a went away and opened up both land in the far north and general store as well as several shipping businesses. sea lanes, shipping produce near and far, around the With John away so often at sea, it would appear that Eliz- world and especially to Asia and other parts of Australia. abeth, may have taken a very active role in the land- But we won’t! based businesses. Next year we will return to bringing you information They appeared to have been happily married, working relating to an earlier Mandurah, more benign but a closely with each other, both in the businesses in harder existence. In some cases it would be closer to Fremantle and later at the farm.
    [Show full text]
  • Beeliar Regional Park Management Plan
    Beeliar Regional Park Final Management Plan 2006 PLANNING TEAM This plan was co-ordinated by a consultancy team led by Thompson Palmer Pty Ltd working closely with the managers of Beeliar Regional Park – the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM), the City of Melville, the City of Cockburn, the Town of Kwinana and Murdoch University. The Planning Team prepared the plan for the Conservation Commission of Western Australia. Brendan Dooley CALM Tim Bowra CALM Paddy Strano City of Cockburn Ian Davis City of Melville Rosalind Murray Town of Kwinana John McGowan Murdoch University i How to Use This Plan. This plan is divided into sections as set out in the table of contents. Within each section are subsections. Each subsection begins with the objectives to be achieved by management, followed by a discussion of the main issues, and then strategies, accompanied by the agencies responsible for achieving each objective and a priority rating. Priority ratings provide an indication of the relative importance of a strategy. The management agencies names have been abbreviated and a list of all abbreviations used and their meaning is listed in Appendix A. Key Performance Indicators are listed in the plan and outline performance measures, targets, and reporting requirements. A number of issues raised in the plan are interrelated and are dealt with under more than one section. Where this is the case, the discussion refers the reader to other related sections. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Numerous individuals and groups have contributed valuable ideas and information in the preparation of this management plan and their efforts are gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Wastewater As a Potential Source of Recycling in the Perth-Peel Region
    Wastewater as a potential source of recycling in the Perth-Peel region Dr Don McFarlane 3rd January 2019 Adjunct Professor, School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia Prepared for the West Australian Department of Water and Environmental Regulation TRIM: WT13112 1 Citation McFarlane, D.J. (2019). Wastewater as a possible source of recycling in the Perth-Peel region. Report to the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation Important disclaimer The author advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, the author excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. Department of Water and Environmental Regulation disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation. 2 Contents List of Figures .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]