Chinese Export Porcelain and Global Spaces of Imagination Julia Reynolds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chinese Export Porcelain and Global Spaces of Imagination Julia Reynolds Q&A How did you become involved in doing research? I became involved in research in my first year at the University of Kansas. I worked with Dr. Susan Earle, curator of European and American art at the Spencer Museum to place a sculpture in its time period and original location. It was a wonderful chance for me to explore hands-on, object-based learning. Now, I’m able to take graduate seminars in my field of art history, and research topics as varied as Chinese export porcelain and French painting. How is the research process different from what you expected? The research process is different than I expected in that it is so malleable and Julia Reynolds ever-changing. The project proposal and the final draft of my paper are two very different things. HOMETowN Knoxville, Tennessee What is your favorite part of doing research? The hands-on nature of research and the chance to look at one object in such MAJOR depth are by far my favorite parts of research. I could never have that kind of History of Art, Philosophy experience in a classroom! ACADEMIC LEVEL Junior RESEARCH MENTOR Marsha Haufler, Professor of History of Art Amy McNair, Professor of History of Art Chinese export porcelain and global spaces of imagination Julia Reynolds ABSTRACT This paper will examine a Chinese porcelain plate from the Victoria and Albert Museum, London. The plate was produced in Jingdezhen, China ca. 1785-90 and acquired in Iran in 1888. It is painted in pink enamel with a landscape scene in the center and a double border around the edges. The landscape depicts pagoda houses interspersed with rocks, flowers, and trees. It is heavily stylized so as to seem “exotic” and “oriental” to the European eye. The double border consists of a diaper border outlined with a spearhead border. While the plate was manufactured at the site of the imperial kilns, it was intended for export to Europe as part of Chinese porcelain trade. This is made evident in the English transfer-print decoration with its clear, crisp lines and decal- like look. Its purchase in Iran reflects British influence in Persia, which was a colonial subdivision of the British Empire from 1783 to 1971. This paper will consider the Chinese porcelain plate from the perspective of material culture and globalization as well as a limited amount of post-colonialism. Lines of questioning will include: the original setting in English dining customs and culture, its situation within the World Ceramics galleries of the Museum, and the role of British imperialism and its influence on those who used and consumed the Chinese porcelain plate. This will allow for a more detailed and nuanced understanding of the artificial construction of China in the British Empire. 56 | journal OF UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH This paper will examine a Chinese with a tiered roof and curved steps. porcelain plate (fig. 1)1 in the It is located on a watercourse, which collection of the Victoria and Albert allows for a sense of perspective. Museum from the perspective of It is also notable that there are no material culture and globalization. Chinese figures within the scene as The plate is of European shape were present in the blue and white produced in China ca. 1785-90 and “Willow Pattern.” This allows for a acquired in Iran in 1888. While European audience to insert itself the Victoria and Albert Museum within the scene as a space for global purchased it in Iran, the British imagination and creation.4 occupied the southern portion This paper will begin with a of Iran from 1763 to 1971, which detailed description of material indicates that a citizen of the British culture and globalization. It will look Empire owned it. The plate is painted at the importance of engaging with with pink enamel in the manner of material culture and the impact of English transfer-print decoration. globalization in the British Empire Figure 2. Collection of the Victoria and The pink enamel is known as Albert Museum. ca. 1785-1790. Modes of production “famille rose.” It originated in Europe will then be discussed at both in the Rococo era ca. 1750, and was in Bristol ca. 1770-1781, which is Chinese and European porcelain used at the porcelain manufactories also in the collection of the Victoria manufactories. The Chinese of Bristol and Staffordshire in and Albert Museum (fig. 2).2 Famille porcelain plate will be looked at England. This is seen in a cream rose was introduced to China during in its original setting in English pitcher made of hard-paste porcelain the reign of Kangxi (1654-1722). dining custom and culture as well painted with pink enamel produced Ordinarily, it was applied to the as its situation within the World surface of glazed pottery, which had Ceramics galleries of the Victoria been fired, and was then re-fired at a and Albert Museum, which offers lower temperature.3 a chronological and world-wide The Chinese porcelain plate has introduction to the Far East and a double border of diaper pattern South East Asia, the Middle East, edged with gilt. Within the double and European ceramics prior to border is a flower motif composed 1800. The conclusion will determine of oriental lilies with large blossoms. that British imperialism influenced The central design is a variation of those who used and consumed the traditional Chinese landscape the Chinese porcelain plate. This theme. The landscape is heavily method of organization will allow stylized so as to appear “exotic” and for a more thoughtful and organized “oriental” to the European eye. It is presentation of information, as well composed of Chinese architecture as a more complete understanding interspersed with rocks, flowers, of Chinese porcelain, often called and willow trees and branches. “China,” as it was used to construct The Chinese architecture includes an artificial image of China within an open pavilion and a number of the British Empire.5 Figure 1. Collection of the Victoria and Albert Museum. ornamental imitations of pagodas, 1 “Dish,” Victoria and Albert Museum, accessed May 15, 2015 http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O33681/dish-unknown/ 2 “Cream Jug,” Victoria and Albert Museum, accessed May 15, 2015 http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O248369/cream-jug-bristol-porcelain- factory/ 3 “Dish,” Victoria and Albert Museum, accessed May 15, 2015 http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O33681/dish-unknown/ 4 Gerritsen and Riello. “Spaces for Global Interactions,” 112 5 For this and the following paragraph, please see Anne Gerritsen and Giorgio Riello, “Spaces of Global Interactions: The Material Landscapes of Global History,” in Writing Material Culture History, ed. by Anne Gerritsen and Giorgio Riello (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015), 112 6 Gerritsen and Riello, “Introduction,” 4 Summer 2014 – Spring 2015 | 57 MATERIAL CULTURE decorative arts include ceramic Another consideration is that not all Material culture history helps us to art, glassware, furniture, interiors, objects are in museum collections. understand objects as they relate metalwork, textile arts, and Many are held by antique dealers, to the everyday lives of ordinary woodwork. Most often, these art auction houses, private collectors, people who lived in the past.6 forms were made for use in the home and other sources. This makes However, “common people” did not and were ascribed special meaning material culture a logistically necessarily leave behind the written by those who owned and used them. complex area of study that requires records of kings, queens, prime While the worth of material the art historian to consult archives ministers, and generals. Their lives culture studies in strengthening and textual sources such as are more easily traced through the our understanding of the written exhibition catalogues, museum material goods that they bought, and visual past has been made indexes, and online databases and sold, and used, which was a practice evident, there are several areas resources. While material culture common to both the rich and poor. of limitation as well.9 Material studies has the ability to enrich The “consumer revolution” of the limitation offers the perspective that the study of art history, it must be eighteenth century, when more the vast majority of objects do not approached with due consideration. goods were available to larger social survive. Although it is important Although there are limitations to groups than ever before, was the for art historians to consider material culture studies, this paper catalyst for much historical research existing objects in relation to those will attempt to address them. While in the 1980s and 1990s. This was that are absent, this is not always material limitation is a consideration, followed by studies of consumptions possible. Within the decorative arts, there are more than 1,000 pieces of patterns in Renaissance Italy, early metalwork was often melted down Chinese porcelain in the Victoria and modern continental Europe, and the for the sake of the precious metals Albert Museum produced between nineteenth and twentieth century. and jewels. Another complication 1750-1800 alone. While the pink More recently, consumption has is that objects have often lost the enamel painted porcelain is not as been studied in the cultures of context that made them meaningful. well-known as the blue and white the Ottaman Empire, the Persian This de-contextualization must ware is now, it was a popular option Empire, Ming and Qing China, and be acknowledged in art historical at the time. De-contextualization Colonial Latin America as part of an research. There are also conceptual requires the use of non-academic engagement with global history. limitations wherein objects survive sources such as cookbooks and This is a relatively recent field over a period of time.
Recommended publications
  • 'A Mind to Copy': Inspired by Meissen
    ‘A Mind to Copy’: Inspired by Meissen Anton Gabszewicz Independent Ceramic Historian, London Figure 1. Sir Charles Hanbury Williams by John Giles Eccardt. 1746 (National Portrait Gallery, London.) 20 he association between Nicholas Sprimont, part owner of the Chelsea Porcelain Manufactory, Sir Everard Fawkener, private sec- retary to William Augustus, Duke of Cumberland, the second son of King George II, and Sir Charles Hanbury Williams, diplomat and Tsometime British Envoy to the Saxon Court at Dresden was one that had far-reaching effects on the development and history of the ceramic industry in England. The well-known and oft cited letter of 9th June 1751 from Han- bury Williams (fig. 1) to his friend Henry Fox at Holland House, Kensington, where his china was stored, sets the scene. Fawkener had asked Hanbury Williams ‘…to send over models for different Pieces from hence, in order to furnish the Undertakers with good designs... But I thought it better and cheaper for the manufacturers to give them leave to take away any of my china from Holland House, and to copy what they like.’ Thus allowing Fawkener ‘… and anybody He brings with him, to see my China & to take away such pieces as they have a mind to Copy.’ The result of this exchange of correspondence and Hanbury Williams’ generous offer led to an almost instant influx of Meissen designs at Chelsea, a tremendous impetus to the nascent porcelain industry that was to influ- ence the course of events across the industry in England. Just in taking a ca- sual look through the products of most English porcelain factories during Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern, Elegant and Wonderfully Versatile
    MODERN, ELEGANT AND WONDERFULLY VERSATILE. MEISSEN® COSMOPOLITAN CHANGES THE WAY WE THINK ABOUT DINING SERVICES. WWW.MEISSEN.COM 1 AM-000076 TABLEWARE MEISSEN® COSMOPOLITAN STAATLICHE PORZELLAN-MANUFAKTUR MEISSEN GMBH 2 3 ABOUT US Meissen Porcelain Manufactory Meissen porcelain was born out of passion. Augustus the Strong (1670- 1733), Elector of Saxony, zealously pursued the so-called white gold after becoming struck with “Maladie de Porcelaine.” It was for him that alchemist Johann Friedrich Böttger (1682-1719) created the first European porcelain in 1708. At MEISSEN, this storied passion remains the fundament of the manufactory’s masterful works up to this day. More than 300 years of tra- dition and exquisite craftsmanship, unbounded imagination and an avowed dedication to modernity come together to create a timeless aesthetic that can be lived and experienced – every piece handmade in Germany. In 1710, Augustus the Strong decreed the founding of the Meissen porce- lain manufactory, making it the oldest in Europe. The signet of two crossed swords has been the unmistakable trademark of Meissen porcelain since 1722. The swords represent the uncompromising quality, unsurpassed craftsmanship and cultural heritage to which MEISSEN remains committed to this day: from the purest raw material sourced from the manufactory’s own kaolin mine, the world’s largest and oldest trove of moulds, models, patterns and decorations spanning centuries of artistic epochs, to the 10,000 proprietary paint formulas created in the on-site laboratory. And last but not least, they stand for the unsurpassed handicraft, experience and dedication of the manufactory’s artisans, lending every Meissen piece its one-of-a-kind beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Ming Dynasty Porcelain Plate Laura G
    Wonders of Nature and Artifice Art and Art History Fall 2017 Blue-and-White Wonder: Ming Dynasty Porcelain Plate Laura G. Waters '19, Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/wonders_exhibit Part of the Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque Art and Architecture Commons, Fine Arts Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Industrial and Product Design Commons, and the Intellectual History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Waters, Laura G., "Blue-and-White Wonder: Ming Dynasty Porcelain Plate" (2017). Wonders of Nature and Artifice. 12. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/wonders_exhibit/12 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/wonders_exhibit/12 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Blue-and-White Wonder: Ming Dynasty Porcelain Plate Abstract This authentic Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) plate is a prime example of early export porcelain, a luminous substance that enthralled European collectors. The eg nerous gift of oJ yce P. Bishop in honor of her daughter, Kimberly Bishop Connors, Ming Dynasty Blue-and-White Plate is on loan from the Reeves Collection at Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Virginia. The lp ate itself is approximately 7.75 inches (20 cm) in diameter, and appears much deeper from the bottom than it does from the top.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Craft in Orientalism and Modern Design ISHIKAWA, Yoshimune / Phd / Toyo Institute of Art and Design / Japan
    Eastern craft in Orientalism and Modern Design ISHIKAWA, Yoshimune / PhD / Toyo Institute of Art and Design / Japan Chinoiserie / Japonisme / Japanese Design / Scandinavian roof and door with a lattice pattern similar to the back of the chair Design (fig. 1, right). Because part of their design derived from traditional Chinese architecture, their design was different from original Chi- This article focuses on furniture inspired by Eastern culture in Ori- nese furniture. For example, the Chinese chair had a back that entalism and modern design and clarifies the acceptance of the was one curved slat with minimal fretwork. The cabinet was a East not only as exoticism but also as inspiration for new design simple box that had no architectural decoration (however, there and theory beyond century. Eastern craft often offered new im- were some examples that had pediment or cornice in the origi- ages from the eighteenth to the twentieth century, and this his- nal Chinese cabinet importing Orientalism in the nineteenth cen- torical process is easily seen. Therefore, with regard to craft, the tury). The exoticism portrayed by Chippendale was, as it were, a East was not an “other” as Said has suggested. collage of Chinese architecture. In 1754, Chippendale published The Gentleman and Cabinet-Mak- 1. Introduction er’s Director, which shows Chinese style governed by his logi- According to Edward Said, the Orient signified a system of repre- cal method of design. He took Chinese architecture apart once, sentations that were politically framed by the Western world and chose some of its symbolic parts, and then reconstructed them existed as a separate, eccentric, backward, and silently different in Rococo style.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Willow Pattern
    The East India Company at Home, 1757-1857 – UCL History The Willow Pattern: Dunham Massey By Francesca D’Antonio Please note that this case study was first published on blogs.ucl.ac.uk/eicah in June 2014. For citation advice, visit: http://blogs.uc.ac.uk/eicah/usingthewebsite. Unlike other ‘objects studies’ featured in the East India Company At Home 1757-1857 project, this case study will focus on a specific ceramic ware pattern rather than a particular item associated with the East India Company (EIC). With particular attention to the contents of Dunham Massey, Greater Manchester, I focus here on the Willow Pattern, a type of blue and white ‘Chinese style’ design, which was created in 1790 at the Caughley Factory in Shropshire. The large-scale production of ceramic wares featuring the same design became possible only in the late eighteenth century after John Sadler and Guy Green patented their method of transfer printing for commercial use in 1756. Willow Pattern wares became increasingly popular in the early nineteenth century, allowing large groups of people access to this design. Despite imitating Chinese wares so that they recalled Chinese hard-stone porcelain body and cobalt blue decorations, these wares remained distinct from them, often attracting lower values and esteem. Although unfashionable now, they should not be merely dismissed as poor imitations by contemporary scholars, but rather need to be recognized for their complexities. To explore and reveal the contradictions and intricacies held within Willow Pattern wares, this case study asks two simple questions. First, what did Willow Pattern wares mean in nineteenth-century Britain? Second, did EIC families—who, as a group, enjoyed privileged access to Chinese porcelain—engage with these imitative wares and if so, how, why and what might their interactions reveal about the household objects? As other scholars have shown, EIC officials’ cultural understandings of China often developed from engagements with the materials they imported, as well as discussions of and visits to China.
    [Show full text]
  • China: Qing Dynasty Porcelain and Global Exchange Pre-Visit
    China: Qing Dynasty Porcelain and Global Exchange Pre-Visit Share this background information with students before your Distance Learning session. Grade Level: Grades 9-12 Collection: East Asian Art Culture/Region: China, East Asia Subject Area: History and Social Science Activity Type: Distance Learning WHY LOOK AT PLATES AND VASES? When visiting a relative or a fancy restaurant, perhaps you have dined on “fine china.” While today we appreciate porcelain dinnerware for the refinement it can add to an occasion, this conception is founded on centuries of exchange between Asian and Western markets. Chinese porcelain production has a long history of experimentation, innovation, and inspiration resulting in remarkably beautiful examples of form and imagery. At the VMFA, you will examine objects from a small portion of this history — the 18th century during the Qing Dynasty — to expand your understanding of global exchange in this era. Because they were made for trade outside of China, these objects are categorized as export porcelain by collectors and art historians. Review the background information below, and think of a few answers you want to look for when you visit VMFA. QING DYNASTY Emperors, Arts, and Trade Around the end of the 16th century, a Jurchin leader named Nurhaci (1559–1626) brought together various nomadic groups who became known as the Manchus. His forces quickly conquered the area of present-day Manchuria, and his heirs set their sights on China. In 1636 the Manchus chose the new name of Qing, meaning “pure,” to emphasize their intention to purify China by seizing power from the Ming dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 578 a Japanese Porcelain Polychrome Kendi, Kutani, 17Th C
    Ordre Designation Estimation Estimation basse haute 551 A Chinese mythological bronze group, 19/20th C. H: 28 cm 250 350 552 A Chinese bronze elongated bottle-shaped vase, Ming Dynasty H.: 31 600 1200 cm 553 A partial gilt seated bronze buddha, Yongzheng mark, 19th C. or earlier 800 1200 H: 39 cm L: 40 cm Condition: good. The gold paint somewhat worn. 554 A Chinese bronze jardiniere on wooden stand, 19/20th C. H.: 32 cm 300 600 555 A Chinese figural bronze incense burner, 17/18th C. H.: 29 cm 1000 1500 556 A Chinese bronze and cloisonne figure of an immortal, 18/19th C. H.: 31 300 600 cm 557 A Chinese bronze figure of an emperor on a throne, 18/19th C. H.: 30 cm 800 1200 Condition: missing a foot on the right bottom side. 558 A bronze figure of Samanthabadra, inlaid with semi-precious stones, 4000 8000 Ming Dynasty H: 28 cm 559 A Chinese gilt bronze seated buddha and a bronze Tara, 18/19th C. H.: 600 1200 14 cm (the tallest) 560 A Chinese bronze tripod incense burner with trigrams, 18/19th C. H.: 350 700 22,3 cm 561 A tall pair of Chinese bronze “Luduan� figures, 18/19th C. H.: 29 1200 1800 cm 562 A tall gilt bronze head of a Boddhisatva with semi-precious stones, Tibet, 1000 1500 17/18th C. H.: 33 cm 563 A dark bronze animal subject group, China, Ming Dynasty, 15-16th C. H.: 1500 2500 25,5 cm 564 A Chinese dragon censer in champlevé enameled bronze, 18/19th C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sprawling Dragons, Squatting Pagods, and Clumsy Mandarines’, the Georgian Group Jounal, Vol
    Philippa Tristram, ‘Sprawling Dragons, Squatting Pagods, and Clumsy Mandarines’, The Georgian Group Jounal, Vol. V, 1995, pp. 1–8 + 127–128 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 1995 ‘Sprawling dragons, squatting pagods, and clumsy mandarines’ Philippa Tristram Sinologists and art historians agree that in the eighteenth century, as in the seventeenth, dis­ tance lent enchantment to the English view of China. They also agree that disillusionment followed hard upon our first direct experience of that country. In pilot studies of China and the West, the crucial encounter cited used to be the Macartney embassy of 1793, when British subjects first travelled through the ‘Great Within’. But in recent years, sinologists - perhaps aware of the many negative references to China prior to the Macartney embassy1 - have set back the advent of disillusion to 1748, when Captain Anson’s Voyage round the world was pub­ lished. This included an account of his bellicose coastal dispute with the Chinese. Although Anson never entered China proper, sinologists now declare that from 1748 the ‘cult of China, whether intellectual or aesthetic, faded swiftly’.2 Art historians, on the other hand, remark that the baroque chinoiserie of the Restoration lost ground in the early eighteenth century, and returned to favour in rococo form only in the reign of George II, ‘rising to its peak of fash­ ion in the 1750s’3 (directly after the publication of the Voyage}, and declining gradually from 1760-90, displaced by Gothic, not the choleric Captain. Even when seeking evidence prior to 1748 for an admiration of all things Chinese, sinolo­ gists and art historians differ, although in complementary respects.
    [Show full text]
  • Cincinnati Art Asian Society Virtual November 2020: Asian Ceramics
    Cincinnati Art Asian Society Virtual November 2020: Asian Ceramics Though we can't meet in person during the pandemic, we still want to stay connected with you through these online resources that will feed our mutual interest in Asian arts and culture. Until we can meet again, please stay safe and healthy. Essays: East and West: Chinese Export Porcelain https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/ewpor/hd_ewpor.htm Introduced to Europe in the fourteenth century, Chinese porcelains were regarded as objects of great rarity and luxury. Through twelve examples you’ll see luxury porcelains that appeared in Europe in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, often mounted in gilt silver, which emphasized their preciousness and transformed them into entirely different objects. The Vibrant Role of Mingqui in Early Chinese Burials https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/mgqi/hd_mgqi.htm Burial figurines of graceful dancers, mystical beasts, and everyday objects reveal both how people in early China approached death and how they lived. Since people viewed the afterlife as an extension of worldly life, these ceramic figurines, called mingqi or “spirit goods,” disclose details of routine existence and provide insights into belief systems over a thousand-year period. Mingqi were popularized during the formative Han dynasty (206 B.C.–220 A.D.) and endured through the turbulent Six Dynasties period (220–589) and the later reunification of China in the Sui (581–618) and Tang (618–907) dynasties. There are eleven ceramic burial goods (and one limestone) as great examples of mingqui. Indian Pottery https://www.veniceclayartists.com/tag/indian-pottery/ The essay is informative but short.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Chinoiserie in Germany Chinese Tower, English Garden, Munich, Germany
    The Future of Historical Network Research , 13-15 September, 2013 Hamburg Conceptualize into Yanan Sun History Cornell University Heidelberg University “Dots and Lines” [email protected] Dynamic Network Analysis of the History of Chinoiserie Architecture in Germany Outline ² History of Chinoiserie ² Network: build Chinoiserie network ² Diffusion analysis : - Adopter types: 5 phases - Adoption thresholds ² Historical explanation of network analysis Outline ² History ² Network ² Analysis ² Historical explanation History of Chinoiserie ² “Chinoiserie” a French word, meaning “chinese-esque” ² àin decorative arts ² à in architecture ² ! Chinoiserie is not “Chinese,” but “European” Decorative Arts The Chinese Garden, a chinoiserie painting in by François Boucher. Chinoiserie Chinoiserie porcelain, made in Europe Chinoiserie in Decorative Arts Chinoiserie furniture Chinoiserie in Decorative Arts Chinoiserie interior, mirror cabinet in Schönbrunn Palace, Austria Decorative Arts in Chinoiserie Austira Schönbrunn Palace, Chinoiserie interior, Chinoiserie in Decorative Arts 1767 Versaille, France Trianon de Procelain, Chinoiserie in Architecture Chinese/Japanese Tea House, Sanssouci, Potsdam, Germany Architectural Chinoiserie in Germany Chinese Tower, English Garden, Munich, Germany Architectural Chinoiserie in Germany Architectural Chinoiserie in Germany Selected sites with Chinoiserie buildings: 1. Sanssouci , Potsdam 2. New Garden, Potsdam 3. Pillnitz , Dresden 4. Mulang, Wilhelmshöhe, Kassel 5. Nyphemburg, Munich 6. English Garden, Munich 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study of Chinese Trade Ceramics in Sungai Sadong, Sarawak Jonathan
    THE STUDY OF CHINESE TRADE CERAMICS IN SUNGAI SADONG, SARAWAK JONATHAN KO JIA YI UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA 2015 THE STUDY OF CHINESE TRADE CERAMICS IN SUNGAI SADONG, SARAWAK by JONATHAN KO JIA YI Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for degree of Master of Arts January 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was made possible with the assistance and support of a number of people and organisations. First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor, Associate Professor Dr. Stephen Chia Ming Soon, the Deputy Director of the Centre for Global Archaeological Research (CGAR), Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang, for his tremendous support and excellent guidance during my research, and for providing me with a conductive environment for doing my research. I would also like to express my gratitude to the Director of CGAR, Professor Dato’ Dr. Mokhtar Saidin for giving me the opportunity to undertake the graduate study program at CGAR. I am deeply indebted to his constant support and encouragement. I also wish to thank USM for providing the environment and the financial assistance for this research under the USM Research University Grant. My thanks also go to the Institute of Postgraduate Studies in USM for providing the USM Postgraduate Fellowship during the course of my study. The analysis of Chinese trade ceramic in Sadong River, Sarawak was done over a period of more than one year at the Archaeology Section, Sarawak Museum Department with the assistance of a number of people. First of all, I would like to thank the Director of the Sarawak Museum Department, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Chinoiserie
    ONE THE POLITICS OF CHINOISERIE The Disappearance of Chinese Objects “Is there any point to which you would wish to draw my attention?” “To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.” “The dog did nothing in the night-time.” “That was the curious incident,” remarked Sherlock Holmes. —Arthur Conan Doyle, “Silver Blaze” This chapter explores an absence, or more accurately, an erasure. It is an attempt to understand why Chinese art disappeared from an American art discourse in the 1870s. This remains a critical question still, because despite the reemergence of Chinese objects in the art discourse of the 1890s, that almost twenty-year silence has shaped subsequent discussion concerning American art of that time. The significance of Americans’ reluctance to acknowledge the Chinese origin of import ware during this period cannot be seen fully by examining the isolated Chinese object. Rather, such an investigation requires a more oblique look, one capable of incorporating the surrounding political as well as the aesthetic context. Reconstructing the surrounding positive space gives shape to the missing discourse: seeing Chinese material culture through the mediating histories of the earlier decades of commerce between China and the United States, through American attitudes toward Chinese people, and, finally, through the contrasting American reception of Japanese people and things. The juxtaposition of social/political history with the study of material culture assumes a relationship between politics and art. Connections between 13 © 2012 State University of New York Press, Albany 14 COLLECTING OBJECTS / EXCLUDING PEOPLE the two have been elaborated throughout the modern period at least as early as 1798, when William Blake wrote: “The Foundation of Empire is Art and Science.
    [Show full text]