2018-2023 Transit Development Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2018-2023 Transit Development Plan PIERCE TRANSIT TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 2018-2023 (This page intentionally left blank) Table of Contents Section 1 – Organization 3 Section 2 – Physical Plant 7 Section 3 – Service Characteristics 13 Section 4 – Service Connections 29 Section 5 – Notable Activities in 2017 33 Section 6 – Proposed Action Strategies: 2018 – 2023 53 Section 7 – Capital Improvement Program: 2018 – 2023 65 Section 8 – Operating Revenues and Expenditures: 2018 - 2023 69 Appendices 73 Appendix A – Six-Year Financial Plan: 2018 - 2023 Appendix B – Operating Data 2017 Appendix C – Unfunded and Unprogrammed Projects Appendix D – Inventories: Rolling Stock Appendix E – Inventories: Equipment and Facilities 1 Transit Development Plan: 2018 – 2023 (This page intentionally left blank) 2 Transit Development Plan: 2018 – 2023 Section 1 - Organization Governance and Structure Pierce Transit is a Public Transportation Benefit Area Corporation (PTBA) incorporated under authority of Chapter 36.57A of the Revised Code of Washington. In 1979 voters passed a 0.3 percent sales tax to fund public transportation, which also formed the PTBA. Pierce Transit is currently funded through a combination of sales tax revenues (at 0.6 percent of the full 0.9 percent that could be authorized by the electorate), fares and grants, as further detailed in Section 9: Operating Revenues and Expenditures. Pierce Transit provides public transport services in the urbanized portions of Pierce County, as illustrated in Figure 1-1. This is an area covering 292 square miles that generally conforms to the county’s growth management boundary and contains an estimated 70 percent of the county population. The service area includes the incorporated cities and towns of Auburn, Edgewood, Fife, Fircrest, Gig Harbor, Lakewood, Milton, Pacific, Puyallup, Ruston, Steilacoom, Tacoma, and University Place. It also includes multiple population centers within unincorporated Pierce County. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Kent Keel Commissioner Commissioner University Place City Council Nancy Henderson Don Anderson Pierce Transit is Chair Represents Cities of Auburn, Mayor of Lakewood governed by a nine- Fircrest, Gig Harbor, Pacific, member Board of Ruston, and Steilacoom Vice Chair Commissioners. The Board is currently made up of elected officials representing Pierce County, Tacoma, Lakewood, Puyallup, University Place and Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Bruce Dammeier Daryl Eidinger Robin Ferris the smaller cities and Pierce County Executive Represents Cities of Edgewood, Puyallup City Council towns in Pierce Fife, and Milton County. The governance structure allows for a tenth, non- voting union representative, however, Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner this right is currently Ryan Mello Rick Talbert Victoria Woodards not being exercised and Tacoma City Council Pierce County Council Mayor of Tacoma the position is vacant. 3 Transit Development Plan: 2018 – 2023 Figure 1-1 Pierce Transit Service Area The adopted 2018 budget includes 981 positions and 960 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The Service Delivery & Support Division represents 705, and the Maintenance Division represents 166, which combined equate to 89 percent of total positions. The remaining 110 positions (11 percent) are in the Office of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Finance Division, Administration Division, and Planning & Community Development Division. 4 Transit Development Plan: 2018 – 2023 Figure 1-2 2018 Organizational Chart CITIZENS OF PIERCE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 2018 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Sue Dreier Deanne Jacobson, Clerk of the Board/Public Records Officer Kristol Bias, Deputy Clerk of the Board Administrative Services Executive Director of Executive Director of Planning & Executive Director of Service Executive Director of General Counsel Administration/EEO Officer/Safety Executive Director of Finance Community Development/DBE Delivery & Support Maintenance Office r Office r Dana Henderson Vivienne Kamphaus Bre tt Fre shwate rs Michael Griffus Ryan Wheaton Skip Huck Senior Legal Assistant Senior Executive Assistant Senior Executive Assistant Senior Executive Assistant Senior Executive Assistant Senior Executive Assistant Information Technology Manager/CTO Finance Department Service Delivery Department Communications Department Radio Program Administration Information Technology Department Accounting Office Assistant Public Relations Maintenance Bus Radio Systems Network Security Budgeting Transportation Operators Internal Communications Communications Customer Service/Help Desk Revenue Accounting Operators Admin Government & Community Relations IT Systems Support Business Data Analytics Operators Dispatch Marketing Fleet Management Department Operations Data Operators Rider Information Office Assistant Employee Services Department Fare M edia & ORCA Automotive Human Resources Procurement Department Service Support Department Bus Repair Labor Relations Purchasing Communications Transit Development Department Body Work Customer Services Office Assistant Component Rebuild Lean & Workforce Development Project Management Department Capital Planning M aintenance Training Project Controls Specialized Transportation Department Service Planning Facilities Management Bus Safety & Training Paratransit (SHUTTLE) Assistant Bus Stop Program M aintenance M echanics Paratransit Customer Service Scheduling Custodial Risk Management Department Paratransit Operations Risk M anagement ADA Eligibility Community Development Department Warehouse Claims/Workers' Compensation Vanpool Business Partnerships Office Assistant Safety Special Events Warehouse Techs Service Quality Public Safety Department Employer Services Warehouse Courier Records Assistant Grants Physical Security ORCA Public Safety Records Transit Police Uniform Security 5 Transit Development Plan: 2018 – 2023 MISSION VISION Pierce Transit improves people’s quality of life by Your preferred transportation choice for today providing safe, reliable, innovative and useful and tomorrow. transportation services that are locally based and regionally connected. ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES • Innovative…dedicated to providing our customers with leading edge services that enhance their transportation experience. • Driven…continuously improving our capabilities, work habits, processes, and attitudes by listening to our employees and customers. • Responsible…invested in managing the safety, quality, and reliability, of our services. 6 Transit Development Plan: 2018 – 2023 Section 2 - Physical Plant Pierce Transit’s headquarters and maintenance facility are located at 3701 96th Street SW, Lakewood, Washington 98499. Transit Centers and Stations • 72nd Street Transit Center - The 72nd Street Transit Center is located on the northwest corner of E. 72nd Street and Portland Avenue E in Tacoma. This facility has a 68-stall Park-and-Ride lot and is served by five bus routes. • Commerce Transfer Facility - Located along Commerce Street between S. 9th and S. 13th Streets in Tacoma’s downtown core, Commerce includes seven passenger boarding zones, and a bus turnaround/layover facility that is served by 17 Pierce Transit, three Intercity Transit, and two Sound Transit bus routes. • Lakewood Towne Center Transit Center - This facility is located in the northern peripheral area of the Lakewood Towne Center. It is served by eight Pierce Transit and one Sound Transit bus routes. • Parkland Transit Center - The Parkland Transit Center is located on the northwest corner of Pacific Avenue and S. 121st Street in Parkland. Two bus routes make trips through this facility, which includes a 62-stall Park-and-Ride lot. • South Hill Mall Transit Center - The South Hill Mall Transit Center is located in Puyallup on the northwest corner of 5th Street SE and 112th Street E, on the south end of the South Hill Mall. Three Pierce Transit bus routes make trips through this facility. • Tacoma Community College Transit Center - Located on the Tacoma Community College campus on the northeast corner of S. 19th and Mildred Streets, this facility is served by eight Pierce Transit and one Sound Transit bus routes. Adjacent to the transit center is a 95-stall Park-and-Ride lot. • Tacoma Dome Station - This facility is located two blocks north of the Tacoma Dome on Puyallup Avenue between East E Street and East G Street. It is served by seven Pierce Transit, four Sound Transit, and three Intercity Transit bus routes. It consists of a 2,337-space parking garage, of which 40 spaces are reserved for short-term parking, connected to a covered waiting area for local and regional express bus routes. Other amenities include bicycle lockers and racks, plus a secure bike storage area or “spa,” 24-hour security, and a customer service outlet. In 2017 a specially marked pick-up location for Uber and Lyft customers was installed on East G Street, on the east side of the station. The Tacoma Dome Station is also Tacoma’s hub for Sounder Commuter Rail, Sound Transit Link Light Rail, and Greyhound Bus. In addition, Amtrak will be moving to Freighthouse Square once the new station is completed in the near future. • Tacoma Mall Transit Center - The Tacoma Mall Transit Center is located across S. 48th Street on the south side of the Tacoma Mall, just east of S. Oakes Street. Seven Pierce Transit and one Intercity Transit bus routes serve this facility. 7 Transit Development Plan: 2018 – 2023 Park-and-Ride Lots and Bus Stops • Park-and-Ride Lots - Pierce Transit’s fixed route bus service operates in proximity
Recommended publications
  • MEMORANDUM of AGREEMENT to Implement a Regional Reduced Fare Permit for Senior and Disabled Persons
    MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT To Implement a Regional Reduced Fare Permit for Senior and Disabled Persons This agreement is entered into as of the August 30, 2017, by and between Clallam Transit System, the City of Everett (Everett Transit), Grays Harbor Transit, Thurston County Public Transportation Benefit Authority (Intercity Transit), Jefferson Transit Authority (Jefferson Transit), King County Department of Transportation – Metro Transit Division (King County Metro), King County Marine Division (King County Water Taxi), Kitsap County Public Transportation Benefit Area (Kitsap Transit), Pierce County Ferries, Pierce County Public Transportation Benefit Area (Pierce Transit), Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corporation (Community Transit), Washington State Department of Transportation – Ferries Division (Washington State Ferries), Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit), Mason County Public Transportation Benefit Area Authority (Mason Transit Authority), Skagit Transit, and Whatcom Transportation Authority hereinafter called the “parties.” Section 1. Purpose and Changes from Prior Agreement: The purpose of this agreement is to set forth the requirements for and implementation of the Regional Reduced Fare Permit (RRFP) established in memoranda of agreement dated May 17, 1982, August 8, 1984, August 8, 1987, September 8, 1994, December 1, 2000, September 1, 2002, February 3, 2003, August 1, 2009, December 1, 2012, and June 1, 2015. This agreement supersedes these 10 prior agreements. Grays Harbor Transit has been added to this agreement as a party , including amendments to Attachments 1 and 2. Section 7 - Eligibility Certification - has been modified from the agreement dated June 1st, 2015 to indicate that photo identification is required to be provided during eligibility determination. Section 5 – Cost of Regional Reduced Fare Permit – has been changed to indicate that issuing agencies can charge any amount up to $3 for permanent, temporary, and replacement RRFP cards.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Link Initial Segment and Airport Link Before & After Study
    Central Link Initial Segment and Airport Link Before & After Study Final Report February 2014 (this page left blank intentionally) Initial Segment and Airport Link Before and After Study – Final Report (Feb 2014) Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Before and After Study Requirement and Purposes ................................................................................................... 1 Project Characteristics ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Milestones .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Data Collection in the Fall .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Organization of the Report ........................................................................................................................................ 2 History of Project Planning and Development ....................................................................................................... 2 Characteristic 1 - Project Scope .............................................................................................................................. 6 Characteristic
    [Show full text]
  • Jim Stanton Leon Feazell Charles Bolcom
    Jim Stanton Leon Feazell Charles Bolcom www.cooperscully.com © 2017 This paper and/or presentation provides information on general legal issues. It is not intended to provide advice on any specific legal matter or factual situation, and should not be construed as defining Cooper and Scully, P.C.'s position in a particular situation. Each case must be evaluated on its own facts. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act on this information without receiving professional legal counsel. Terminology MCS - 90: “Endorsement For Motor Carrier Policies of Insurance For Public Liability Under Sections 29 and 30 of the Motor Carrier Act of 1980“ 49 C.F.R. §§ 387.7, 387.15 Statute and Regulations do not specifically reference “MCS - 90" Form created by the regulatory agency Formerly - ICC Abolished 1996 Now – FMCSA (Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration) Part of D.O.T Terminology MCA - The Statute: Federal Motor Carrier Act of 1980 49 U.S.C. § 10101 et seq. FMCSR - The Regulations: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations 49 C.F.R. Parts 300-399 Online: www.fmcsa.dot.gov/regulations Under Authority Secretary of Transportation, to provide requirements for operations and equipment of motor vehicles 49 U.S.C. § 14102 (a)(4) Purposes of MCS-90 Reasons MCA Enacted: Deregulate trucking industry Address abuses regarding public safety MCS - 90 Purpose: Assure vehicles, including leased, covered by authorized carrier’s insurance Mandate that carriers assume responsibility for vehicles, including leased. 49 C.F.R. §387.1 Mandate that insurance applies to vehicles, including leased, not on the policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion No. M2020-69 Funding Agreement for Capped Contribution for Rapidride C Line Improvements
    Motion No. M2020-69 Funding Agreement for Capped Contribution for RapidRide C Line Improvements Meeting: Date: Type of action: Staff contact: System Expansion Committee 11/12/2020 Recommend to Board Don Billen, Executive Director, Board 11/19/2020 Final action PEPD Cathal Ridge, Executive Corridor Director- Central Corridor Chris Rule, HCT Project Manager – Central Corridor Proposed action Authorizes the chief executive officer to execute an agreement with the City of Seattle and King County to reimburse the City of Seattle for $1,730,000 and King County Metro for $2,800,000 to provide a total funding contribution of $4,530,000 for bus speed and reliability improvements to the RapidRide C Line serving West Seattle to South Lake Union. Key features summary • This action authorizes Sound Transit to enter into an inter-local agreement with the City of Seattle and King County to reimburse the City and County for costs of up to $4.53 million for speed and reliability improvements to the RapidRide C Line. • The Sound Transit 3 (ST3) System Plan includes a capped capital contribution of $65 million for bus capital enhancements to design and construct transit priority improvements that improve speed and reliability for the Madison BRT project and the RapidRide C and D Lines. • In 2018 the Sound Transit Board established the RapidRide C and D Improvements project and approved an initial study of potential improvements performed by the West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions project team. • In September the Board of Directors moved that staff bring forward an agreement for a limited near- term authorization for RapidRide C Line improvements pending a more comprehensive program realignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Kastning V. State Farm – Minnesota Court of Appeals
    STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A12-0584 Bruce Kastning, et al., Appellants, vs. State Farm Insurance Companies, Respondent. Filed September 24, 2012 Affirmed Hooten, Judge Hon. Douglas L. Richards Faribault County District Court File No. 22-CV-11-182 Jason D. Pederson, Fuller, Wallner, Cayko & Pederson, Ltd., Bemidji, Minnesota (for appellants) Gregory E. Kuderer, Fairmont, Minnesota; and Kay N. Hunt, Lommen Abdo Cole King Stageberg PA, Minneapolis, Minnesota (for respondent) Considered and decided by Worke, Presiding Judge; Hooten, Judge; and Collins, Judge.* S Y L L A B U S An uninsured farm tractor is not a “motor vehicle” for purposes of the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 65B.41-.71 (2010), because a farm tractor is neither subject to registration under chapter 168 of the Minnesota Statutes nor designed “for use primarily upon public roads, highways or streets.” Neither is an * Retired judge of the district court, serving as judge of the Minnesota Court of Appeals by appointment pursuant to Minn. Const. art. VI, § 10. uninsured farm tractor a “motor vehicle” under the uninsured motorist coverage of an insurance policy that defines “motor vehicle,” in part, as subject to registration under chapter 168 of the Minnesota Statutes and “designed for use on public highways.” O P I N I O N HOOTEN, Judge Appellants challenge the district court’s summary-judgment dismissal of their claim for uninsured motorist coverage under a policy issued by respondent, arguing that the farm tractor with which they collided was an uninsured “motor vehicle” within the meaning of their policy and, alternatively, that they are entitled to coverage under the reasonable-expectations doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant) V
    Page 1 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al. (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant) v. ILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellees. Docket No. 103816. SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS 226 Ill. 2d 395; 875 N.E.2d 1096; 2007 Ill. LEXIS 1156; 314 Ill. Dec. 809 September 20, 2007, Opinion Filed PRIOR HISTORY: Appeal from the Appellate Court step-down provisions in appellee's policies were contrary for the First District. to Illinois public policy and were void. The appellate State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ill. Farmers Ins. Co., court reversed that holding, finding the step-down 368 Ill. App. 3d 914, 858 N.E.2d 519, 2006 Ill. App. provisions were not contrary to Illinois public policy and LEXIS 995, 306 Ill. Dec. 722 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist., were enforceable. The court, after implementing the 2006) various rules of statutory construction, held that nothing in the statutory pronouncements of the Illinois CASE SUMMARY: Legislature prohibited appellee's step-downs since appellee's policies provided coverage to the named insured and permissive users of the named insured's PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Appellant insurer was vehicle in the mandatory minimum amounts. granted leave to appeal the judgment of the appellate court (Illinois), which reversed a trial court order granting OUTCOME: The court affirmed, in part, the judgment it partial summary judgment and held that appellee of the appellate court upholding the validity of the insurer's step-down provisions were not contrary to step-down provisions contained in appellee's policies. public policy and were enforceable.
    [Show full text]
  • Jim Umpleby Elected As Caterpillar's Next
    News October 17, 2016 Caterpillar contact: Rachel Potts Global Government & Corporate Affairs Office: 309-675-6892 Mobile: 309-573-3444 [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Caterpillar Chairman and CEO Doug Oberhelman Elects to Retire in 2017; Jim Umpleby Elected as Caterpillar’s Next CEO; Dave Calhoun to Become Non-Executive Chairman of the Board PEORIA, Ill. – After more than 41 years with Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE: CAT), Chairman and CEO Doug Oberhelman has elected to retire, effective March 31, 2017. During his time as Chairman and CEO, Oberhelman has reinvigorated the company’s focus on serving customers while also driving a culture of quality and safety. Oberhelman led the company to its highest sales and revenues peak in its 91-year history in 2012, and, since that time, has successfully led the company through the unprecedented downturn affecting our key industries. During Oberhelman’s tenure: • Product quality levels have reached historically high levels. • Market position for machines has significantly increased. • New Lean Management processes have simplified and sped production capabilities, improving product availability for dealers and customers. • The company has increased its quarterly dividend by 83 percent since 2010. • The balance sheet is strong, and at the end of the second quarter of 2016, Caterpillar’s Machinery Energy & Transportation debt-to-capital ratio was 39.0 percent, with $6.764 billion in cash as of June 30, 2016. (more) -2- • Global safety metrics for employees have dramatically improved, with the Recordable Injury Frequency improving each year. • Caterpillar has been granted nearly 7,300 patents worldwide. • The company dramatically expanded its commitment to lower owning and operating costs for customers by connecting new and existing equipment through digital technology and data analytics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growing Transit Communities Strategy
    The Growing Transit Communities Strategy October 2013 Puget Sound Regional Council PSRC The Growing Transit Communities Partnership is funded by the Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant Program of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Additional funding for this document provided in part by member jurisdictions, grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Highway Administration and Washington State Department of Transportation. The work that provided the basis for this publication was supported by funding under an award with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The substance and findings of the work are dedicated to the public. The author and publisher are solely responsible for the accuracy of the statements and interpretations contained in this publication. Such interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views of the Government. PSRC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. For more information, or to obtain a Title VI Complaint Form, see http://www.psrc.org/about/public/titlevi or call 206-464-4819. American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information: Individuals requiring reasonable accommodations may request written materials in alternate formats, sign language interpreters, physical accessibility accommodations, or other reasonable accommodations by contacting the ADA Coordinator, Thu Le, at 206.464.6175, with two weeks’ advance notice. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may contact the ADA Coordinator, Thu Le, through TTY relay 711. Servicios de Traducción Disponible 206-971-3052, Diana Martinez. Có dịch vụ thông dịch sang tiếng Việt.
    [Show full text]
  • October 12, 2004 CV 03 6793 Hartman V. Stat
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI HARRY HARTMAN and PAMELA ) HARTMAN, individuals, as individuals ) and assignees of Jon Graf’s rights set forth ) CASE NO. CV-03-06793 in Assignment Dated December, 2001, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs, ) AND ORDER IN RE: ) DEFENDANT’S MOTION vs. ) FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY ) COMPANY, a foreign corporation doing ) business in the State of Idaho, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Plaintiffs pursued claims against an insurer pursuant to an assignment of rights from its insured. Upon refusal to make payment, Plaintiffs filed the instant case against the insurer. Defendant moved for Summary Judgment. Motion denied. Joseph Jarzabek, ELSAESSER JARZABEK ANDERSON MARKS ELLIOTT & McHUGH, attorneys for Plaintiffs. James D. LaRue, Jeffrey A. Thomson, and Jon M. Bauman, ELAM & BURKE, attorneys for Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER IN RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT: 1 I FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A. Underlying Lawsuit In order to understand this case, it is necessary to review the underlying facts and an underlying case based upon those facts. Harry and Pamela Hartman (“Hartmans”) are the parents of Ty Hartman. On November 8, 1998, Ty disappeared after spending the evening with friends near Bonners Ferry. About a month later on December 9, 1998, Hartmans filed a wrongful death lawsuit in Boundary County against the three friends and their parents. One of those friends was Jon Graf.1 Eventually, the defendants in that lawsuit led police to the charred remains of Ty. They admitted that Ty had died early on the morning of November 9, 1998, and that some of them had burned his body.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierce Transit 2016 BUS STOP Manualgo! Table of Contents
    Pierce Transit 2016 BUS STOP MANUALgo! Table of Contents INTRODUCTION History 3 Service Area/PTBA Map 4 Boundary Map 5 Types of Service 6 BUS STOP STANDARDS Basic Standards & Site Characteristics 7 Site Selection Improvement Design Considerations 8 Passenger Safety Improvements 9 Bus Zone Improvements 10 Signage & Passenger Information 11-14 Benches 15-18 Shelters 19-27 Sign & Pole Installation 28-34 Amenities 35-39 Non-Pierce Transit Amenities 40-41 Spacing & Frequency 42 Placement in Relation to Intersections 43-45 Placement in Relation to Crosswalks 46 Pedestrian Issues & Accessibility Considerations 47 BUS STOP PROGRAM Purpose 48-49 Amenity Distribution Chart 50 Function & Responsibilities 51 Day-to-Day Operations 52 Installation & Improvement Process 53-54 Regional Agency Relationships 55 Relocation Criteria 56 Amenity Removal Guidelines 57 LAND USE Review Process 58 Reporting 58 SHELTERS, BENCHES & PADS Basic Shelter Characteristics 59 Bench Design Characteristics 60 Concrete Foundation Pad Specifications 61 LOCATION GUIDELINES & PULLOUT CHARACTERISTICS On Street Parking 62-63 Curb Painting 64 Curb Bulbs 65 Pullouts under 40 MPH 66 Pullouts over 40 MPH 67 Pullout Dimension Details 68 SPECIAL SHELTER PROGRAMS Business District & Neighborhood Shelters 69 Advertising Shelter Program 70 Art Shelters 71 BUS STOP SECURITY Issues & Procedures 72-73 1 BUS STOP MANAGEMENT LITERATURE Inventory of Forms, Formats & Samples 74 Sample – Request for Bus Stop Change 75 Sample – Route Repair Slip 76 Sample – Bus Stop Inventory Worksheet 77 Sample
    [Show full text]
  • ST Express 590 (Tacoma – Seattle) And
    Eastlake Ave E ST Express Eastlake Ave E StewartStewart StSt Yale Ave N Yale Yale Ave N Yale 6th Ave 6th Ave 9th Ave 9th Ave HowellHowell StSt 7th Ave 590 TacomaDOWNTOWNDOWNTOWN – Seattle 7th Ave Adult fares $3.25 4th Ave SEATTLESEATTLE 4th Ave 594 Lakewood – Seattle Olive Way 2nd Ave Olive Way 2nd Ave Effective September 19, 2021 – March 19, 2022 PikePike StSt SenecaSeneca StSt ConnectingConnecting routesroutes 2nd2nd AveAve ExtExt CherryCherry StSt LakewoodLakewood StationStation Eastlake Ave E SS WashingtonWashington StSt ITIT Stewart St Yale Ave N Yale 612612 620620 SS JacksonJackson StSt 6th Ave STST 9th Ave Howell St 580580 592592 7th Ave Lumen Field Lumen Field SS RoyalRoyal BroughamBrougham WyWy SS LineLine DOWNTOWN T-MobileT-Mobile ParkPark 4th Ave SR 512 Park & Ride SEATTLE SS HolgateHolgate StSt SR 512 Park & Ride IT Olive Way IT 2nd Ave 612612 620620 PugetPuget SS LanderLander StSt PT SoundSoundPike St PT SS SpokaneSpokane StSt 33 44 Seneca St STST STST STST Connecting routes 574574 580580 592592 2nd Ave Ext Cherry St 590590 Lakewood Station594 Downtown Tacoma/ S Washington St IT 594 Downtown Tacoma/ SODO Busway SODO Busway 612 620 CommerceCommerce StSt Commerce St S Jackson St Commerce St Downtown Tacoma/ ST PTPT Downtown Tacoma/ 580 592 CommerceCommerce StSt SS 10th10th StSt 11 1313 4545 400400 Lumen Field S Royal Brougham Wy S Line 22 1616 4848 500500 T-Mobile Park DOWNTOWNDOWNTOWN 33 4141 5757 501501 1111 4242 6363 S Holgate St TACOMATACOMA SR 512 Park & Ride 594594IT STST Pacific Ave Pacific Pacific Ave Pacific 612 620
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Pierce County Regional Report
    Pierce County 2019 Regional Report More transit choices are coming 1 Ride with us page 14 Viaje con nosotros página 15 당사의 교통편을 이용하세요 15 페이지 Ездите с нами страница 15 Sumakay sa amin pahina 15 Lái với chúng tôi trang 15 搭乘我們的車輛 第 15 頁 2 Committed to Delivery The cranes we see dotting the landscape are signs of new jobs and people coming to the region. Along with new opportunities this growth brings more cars and more traffic to our already crowded roads. To keep our region moving in the face of this growth, voters have approved the most ambitious transit expansion in the country. Sound Transit is committed to delivering this expanded system as efficiently as possible. This Pierce County edition of the 2019 Regional Report provides an update on the status of your tax investments. It tells you the progress Sound Transit is making to bring the expanded system into operation, the possible challenges we see on the horizon and how you can help shape decisions ahead. This report is just one way you can stay informed. We hope you will also visit our website for more details and subscribe to updates about the projects that interest you the most. Get involved and get onboard soundtransit.org/2019report 3 3 Transit helps keep the region moving as our population grows. By 2040, Pierce County is projected to be home to a quarter million more people than in 2015. That’s like doubling the combined populations of Tacoma and Puyallup. People are discovering the South Sound quality of life at a record pace.
    [Show full text]