27 585263 First-Progres-Report-Feb

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

27 585263 First-Progres-Report-Feb 2 Executive Summary The first year of the “Let’s Build a Home Together” project was burdened with a number of obstacles, most of which were outside the UNOPS’ control. Still, there were positive aspects in implementation that include building of trust among the Project beneficiaries, full participation of 170 identified families in all consultations about durable housing solutions, and high involvement of women in the decision making process. The good communication with the focal points appointed by the City of Belgrade meant there was a high turnout at all events involving the beneficiary community. Another positive move was obtaining the location permit for the construction of social housing flats in Orlovsko naselje, albeit with a four-month delay. However, only one other location – in Jabučki Rit - out of six identified in the City of Belgrade Action Plan for the Resettlement of the Residents of Makiš, Resnik, Jabučki Rit and Kijevo Container Settlements (RAP), was assessed as adequate, though conditionally, because of its remoteness and isolation. In these two locations, 27 units can be constructed compared to 121 planned by the RAP. This reconfirmed the need for additional sites and the City of Belgrade has been advised formally and informally that it must urgently propose sufficient number of new locations, with adequate capacity to accept all beneficiaries interested in the social housing. It is of utmost importance that any new location has resolved urban-planning status and ownership, and that the location permit for social housing construction can be issued immediately. Furthermore, the housing design proposed within the RAP - prefabricated wooden multi- storey blocks - is no longer valid having been superseded by the new legislation. In addition, changes in legislation that occurred during 2013 are also influencing the increase of special standards depending on the number of family members. Both result in the increased costs for the construction. Due to internal reasons, the OSCE Mission in Serbia is not in a position to purchase the village housing as originally envisaged. The Delegation of the European Union formally requested UNOPS to alter its activities to include purchasing of all village houses in its activities. Procurement of the building material for the reconstruction of nine self-owned houses is in progress, with minute delays. The completion of the works for the first six houses is expected by the end of July 2014, at the latest. The next three houses should be reconstructed by the end of October, when the construction of one completely new house is also going to be finalized. This will result in 50 people being provided with durable housing solutions. In October 2013, in response to the delays and remaining obstacles, the European Integration Office of the Government of the Republic of Serbia (SEIO) and the Delegation of European Union (DEU) included the Project on the ‘bottleneck list’, as its delays potentially jeopardise the achievements of results. The key difficulties encountered include: the lack of 3 capacities, as well as of accountability of the City of Belgrade to take ownership and implement the RAP; inability of the City and its municipalities to identify new locations for the social housing units; ousting of the Mayor of Belgrade and delays in appointment of the Interim City Council, and hence changes in several City Secretariats as well as in the membership of the Coordination Body; poor involvement of the City of Belgrade institutions dealing with urban planning and construction issues, utility companies and public enterprises; the local community objections related to the arrival of the new Roma neighbours that included discriminatory attitudes; delays in purchase of village houses by the OSCE that meant that the final list of beneficiaries to be relocated to the specific locations could not be defined; as well as uncertainties in regards the mandatory co-funding for the Project by the City of Belgrade. The Project Team is in the process of preparing an Addendum to introduce a new budget line for the purchase of the village houses directly. However, the implementation of the Project to date has shown that without full political commitment of the City of Belgrade and its improved ability to coordinate all institutions, allocation of funding and an efficient task force to lead the process, the Project won’t be completed on time or within the budget. Options are already being considered for an extension of the Project is required. This Progress Report, along with the Executive Summary, has nine chapters and accompanying annexes, describing the background, activities and results, assumptions and risks, difficulties encountered, partnerships established, cross-cutting issues as well as management/operational details of implementation, including monitoring and evaluation. 4 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 3 List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 7 1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Problems to be addressed ............................................................................................... 8 1.2 Government and sector policy ........................................................................................ 9 1.3 Beneficiaries and parties involved ................................................................................. 11 2 Intervention .......................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Overall objective ............................................................................................................ 12 2.2 Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Results ........................................................................................................................... 12 2.4 Activities ........................................................................................................................ 19 3 Assumptions and risks .......................................................................................................... 39 3.1 Assumptions .................................................................................................................. 39 3.2 Risks ............................................................................................................................... 39 4 Partnerships .......................................................................................................................... 44 5 Difficulties encountered ....................................................................................................... 45 6 Cross cutting issues .............................................................................................................. 47 6.1 Gender ........................................................................................................................... 47 6.2 Environment .................................................................................................................. 47 6.3 Institutional and management capacity ........................................................................ 48 6.4 Good governance .......................................................................................................... 49 7 Visibility ................................................................................................................................ 49 8 Implementation .................................................................................................................... 50 8.1 Procurement .................................................................................................................. 51 8.2 Human resources ........................................................................................................... 51 8.3 Finance .......................................................................................................................... 51 8.4 Logistics/Travel .............................................................................................................. 51 8.5 ICT .................................................................................................................................. 52 9 Monitoring and evaluation ................................................................................................... 52 9.1 Monitoring ..................................................................................................................... 52 9.2 Steering Committee meetings ....................................................................................... 53 5 9.3 Evaluation ...................................................................................................................... 53 Annex I - Progress against indicators ...................................................................................... 54 Annex II – Indicative Plan for Q1 and Q2 2014 ........................................................................ 59 Annex III - Key developments .................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Airac Aip Amdt
    SRBIJA / CRNA GORA AIRAC AIP SERBIA / MONTENEGRO KONTROLA LETENJA SRBIJE I CRNE GORE SMATSA doo BEOGRAD / AMDT SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES SMATSA llc 6/21 SLUŽBA ZA VAZDUHOPLOVNO INFORMISANJE / AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE Trg Nikole Pašića 10, P.B. 640, 11000 Beograd, Serbia, AFS: LYBBYOYX 6 MAY TEL: + 381 11 321 8056, 321 8051 FAX: + 381 11 324 0456 e-mail: [email protected] Stupa na snagu / Effective Date 17 JUN 21 1. Sadržaj 1. Contents 1.1 Lokacijski indikator: LYEV – Uvođenje 1.1 Location indicator: LYEV – Introduction 1.2 AD BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla: Parking pozicije – Izmene 1.2 BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla AD: ACFT stands – Changes (prethodno objavljeno NOTAM-ima) (previously published by NOTAM) 1.3 AD BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla: Navigacioni postupci – 1.3 BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla AD: Navigation procedures – Izmene Changes 1.4 Uređivačke izmene 1.4 Editorial changes 2. Uklonite sledeće stranice 17 JUN 21 / 3. Uložite sledeće stranice 17 JUN 21 / On 17 JUN 21 remove the following pages: On 17 JUN 21 insert the following pages: GEN 0.2–1/2 20 MAY 21 GEN 0.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 GEN 0.4–1/6 20 MAY 21 GEN 0.4–1/6 17 JUN 21 GEN 0.5–1/2 20 MAY 21 GEN 0.5–1/2 17 JUN 21 GEN 2.4–1/2 28 JAN 21 GEN 2.4–1/2 17 JUN 21 GEN 3.2–11/14 20 MAY 21 GEN 3.2–11/14 17 JUN 21 GEN 3.2–15/16 22 APR 21 GEN 3.2–15/16 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.1–1/2 25 MAR 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.1–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.2–1/2 25 MAR 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–5/6 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–5/6 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–5/6 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–1/2 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–5/6 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–1/2 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–5/6 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 9.1–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 9.1–1/2 17 JUN 21 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management and Use of Risk-Based Approaches in Inspection, Maintenance and HSE Analyses of NIS A.D
    STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES GmbH Risk management and use of risk-based approaches in inspection, maintenance and HSE analyses of NIS a.d. plants Final Report for Package B (selected Annexes only) Stuttgart, Belgrade, July 7, 2010 Report title: Final report for Package B Costumer: NIS Petroleum Industry of Serbia Customer order Nr.: 45/609 Risk management and use of risk- Internal project Nr.: 10027 based approaches in inspection, Project title: maintenance and HSE analyses of Project start: October 1, 2006 NIS a.d. plants Project end: December 31, 2010 Subproject: Package B Applicable codes/standards: Workpackage: WP2.11 Date of order acceptance: Task: Date of completion: Additional contract info: Participants in the activity: Distribution (list): Participants / A. Jovanovic, D. Balos, P. Stanojevic, Distribution: B. Orlic, S. Eremic, O. Tot, M. Ilic, Z. 1 x NIS a.d. Pavlovic, D. Subotin, D. Jasin, R. 1 x Steinbeis R-Tech Guntrum, B. Stojanovic Author(s): A. Jovanovic, D. Balos, R. Guntrum Doc. Nr.: Version: 06 Date: July 7, 2010 Document Pages: 193 Annexes: 29 data: Status: Confidentiality: NIS, petroleum industry, risk management, API 581, risk based inspection, Keywords: reliability centered maintenance, Seveso, Safety report © Steinbeis Advanced Risk Technologies GmbH, Willi-Bleicher-Str. 19, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES GmbH Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................... vi List of Tables ................................................... viii 1 Management Summary Report .................... 1 2 Detail Technical Report .............................. 2 2.1 General part ............................................. 2 2.1.1 Introduction ................................. 2 2.1.2 General about NIS a.d. .................. 3 2.1.2.1 Activities ........................................... 3 2.1.2.2 History of the company ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Breeding Biology of the White-Tailed Eagle
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Denisia Jahr/Year: 2009 Band/Volume: 0027 Autor(en)/Author(s): Ham Istvan, Skoric Stefan, Tucakov Marko Artikel/Article: Status and breeding biology of the White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla in former Yugoslavia and in Serbia 127-138 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Status and breeding biology of the White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla in former Yugoslavia and in Serbia I stv án H Á M , S tef a n S K ORI Ć & M a r ko T UCAKOV Abstract: At the end of the first period of research on the White-tailed Eagle (1985–1991) in former Yugoslavia, 80 active and 30 potential breeding pairs (57 active and 17 potential pairs in Croatia, 23 active and 13 potential pairs in Serbia) were known. During that period, the White-tailed Eagle almost exclusively bred in the floodplain forests along the river valleys of the Danube, Sava, Drava, Kupa, Česma, Ilova, Bosut and Tisa Rivers. Nests were found on six tree species, the majority on Pedunculate Oak and native poplars. A total of 171 young White-tailed Eagle were marked by wing-tags. After 12 years, the population census was repeated in Serbia initiating a new period of research on the White-tailed Eagle. The population grew from 23–36 pairs in 1991 to 80–100 pairs in 2008. The population increase started at the beginning of 1990s is still in progress. Possible causes for this dis- tinct increase are improved feeding conditions due to the construction of carp fishponds and increased breeding within hybrid poplar plantations as well as the higher degree of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of ARTS in BELGRADE Interdisciplinary Postgraduate Studies
    UNIVERSITY OF ARTS IN BELGRADE Interdisciplinary postgraduate studies Cultural management and cultural policy Master thesis: URBAN REGENERATION AND LOCAL CULTURAL POLICY by: Snezana Krstanovic Supervisor: Vesna Djukic Dojcinovic, PhD Co-supervisor: Sanjin Dragojevic, PhD Belgrade, August 2006 Acknowledgments This research has risen from the inspiration and information gained during 3 months internship at the British Council office in Belgrade. Research was welcomed by cultural sector representatives in both researched municipalities that sufficiently helped in collecting data and offered a moral support. Besides them, I would like to thank my mentors, family and friends that gradually supported my effort to contribute development of cultural management and cultural policy in Serbia. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Résume 6 Abstract 15 I Introductory part: Basic theories and concepts on local development and urban regeneration 18 1.1. The aim of the thesis 18 1.2. The main research question 19 1.3. Method 21 1.4. Theoretical framework – key notions of the research 27 II Reaching development by integrated urban public policies 31 2.1. Multidisciplinary and inter-sector approach toward urban development 34 2.1.1. The personal benefits as outcomes of mutual relations of cultural, urban and educational policy 34 2.1.2. The economic benefits as outcomes of mutual relations of cultural and economic policy 36 2.1.3. The social benefits as outcomes of mutual relations of cultural and social policy 38 2.2. Bottom-up approach toward urban development 40 2.2.1. Citizens participation in decision-making process 40 2.2.2. Key actors in urban regeneration process and cultural policy 42 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Merger Agreement
    DRAFT MERGER AGREEMENT This Agreement on the status change of merger by absorption (“Agreement”) was entered into in Belgrade on _____________2021, between the following parties: 1. MOJA SUPERNOVA DOO BEOGRAD (Company ID number: 17202057, TIN: 100429741), with the seat at Bulevar Arsenija Čarnojevića 99b, Beograd - Novi Beograd, represented by Managing Director Boris Ivezić (hereinafter referred to as: Transferor) and 2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY TELEKOM SRBIJA, joint stock company Beograd (Company ID: 17162543, TIN: 100002887), with the seat at Takovska 2, Beograd - Palilula, represented by Chief Executive Officer Vladimir Lučić (hereinafter referred to as: Transferee) hereinafter collectively referred to as “Parties“ and individually as “Party“ WHEREAS: Transferor and Transferee decided, pursuant to Article 486 of the Company Law (Official Gazette of RS Nos. 36/11, 99/11, 83/14 – state law, 5/15, 44/18, 95/18 and 91/19) (hereinafter: Company Law), to carry out the status change of merger by absorption of Transferor with Transferee; on the date of this Agreement, Transferee is the sole member of Transferor, holding a 100% stake in the total share capital of Transferor and all the conditions set out in Article 501 of the Company Law were fulfilled, the status change is going to be carried out in a simplified procedure; the conditions for conducting a simplified procedure were fulfilled, the General Meeting of Transferee is not required to pass a decision on the status change of merger by absorption and Transferor need not make an auditor’s report on the completed audit of the status change and the management report on the status change and submit them to the general meeting for approval; under Resolution of the Commercial Court in Belgrade number 5-R.
    [Show full text]
  • Cenovnik Usluge Prevoza Na Relaciji Stovarište Dunavska 55 Po Zonama
    Migomi company d.o.o. Beograd, Dalmatinska 25 tel. 011 2759-323, 011 2759-979, 011 2765-023 Stovarište Dunavska 55 e-mail: [email protected] CENOVNIK USLUGE PREVOZA NA RELACIJI STOVARIŠTE DUNAVSKA 55 PO ZONAMA PODRUČJE Cena prevoza sa PDV-om MESTO MESTO MESTO MESTO Autokomanda Kotež Sebeš Višnjička banja Uže područje Bežanija Krnjača Slanci 500,00 din/t/prm/t grada - do 10km Borča Kumodraž Veliko selo Karaburma Mali Mokri Lug Višnjica Batajnica Kovilovo Pančevo Vinča Beli potok Kneževac Petlovo brdo Vojilovica Bele vode Ledine Rakovica Zemun Boleč Makiš Resnik Zemun polje I zona - do 20km 800,00 din/t/prm/pal Cerak Miljakovac Selo Rakovica Žarkovo Glogonjski rit Miljakovac 3 Soko Salaš Železnik Jajinci Ostružnica Surčin Kaluđerica Ovča Tovilište Kijevo Padinska skela Veliki Mokri Lug Barič Jabučki rit Novi Banovci Umka Bečmen Jakovo Pinosava Velika Moštanica Bela reka Kačarevo Ripanj Vrbovski II zona - do 900,00 din/t/prm/pal Besni fok Leštane Rucka Zaklopača 30km Dobanovci Mala moštanica Starčevo Zuce Grocka Meljak Sremčica Jabuka Nova Pazova Ugrinovci Baćevac Brestovik Mislođin Šiljakovac Banatski Crepaja Obrenovac Šimanovci Banatskobrestovac novo Čenta Omoljica Trešnja Barajevoselo Deč Opovo Umčari III zona - do Baranda Dolovo Petrovčić Urovci 1.000,00 din/t/prm/pal 40 km Bavanište Dunavac Progar Vojka Begaljica Glogonj Rvati Vranić Belegiš Guncati Sefkerin Vrčin Boljevci Ivanovo Seone Zabrežje Boždarevac Karlovčić Stara pazova Brđani Krnješevci Stari Banovci Arnajevo Kupinovo Pločica Sopot Ašanja Landol Popović Stepojevac Babe Leskovac
    [Show full text]
  • Cena Usluge Prevoza Na Relaciji Stovarište Krnjača Po Zonama
    "Good Will - WG" d.o.o. Beograd Žorža Klemansoa 19 011/33-172-18 11000 Beograd 064/00-28-290 Stovarište Krnjača E-mail: [email protected] Radno vreme: ponedeljak - petak 08:00 -16:00 Subota 08:00 - 16:00 Beograd, 01.04.2013. Cena usluge prevoza na relaciji stovarište Krnjača po zonama Autokomanda Jabučki rit Miljakovac Višnjica Cena usluge prevoza sa PDV-om Bele vode Karaburma Ovča Višnjiška banja Bežanija Kotež Padinska skela Zemun Uže područje grada Borča Kovilovo Rakovica Žarkovo 840.00 Cerak Krnjača Sebeš Glogonjski rit Mali Mokri Lug Tovilište Batajnica Kneževac Ostružnica Soko Salaš Besni fok Kumodraž Pančevo Surčin Cena usluge prevoza sa PDV-om Boleč Ledine Perlez Veliki Mokri Lug Čenta Leštani Petlovo brdo Veliko Selo I zona Dunavac Makiš Resnik Vinča Jajinci Miljakovac III Sefkerin Vrbovkso 990.00 Kaluđerica Omoljica Selo Rakovica Zemun polje Kijevo Opovo Slanci Železnik Barič Dolovo Pinosava Vrčin Cena usluge prevoza sa PDV-om Bavanište Glogonj Starčevo Zaklopača Bečmen Jabuka Ugrinovci Zuce II zona Bela Reka Jakovo Umka 1,140.00 Beli Potok Mala Moštanica Velika Moštanica Dobanovci Nova Pazova Vojilovica Baćevac Crepaja Meljak Stara Pazova Banatski Brestovac Deč Mislođin Stari Banovci Cena usluge prevoza sa PDV-om Banatsko Novo Selo Draževac Novi Banovci Surduk Barajevo Golubinci Obrenovac Šimanovci Baranda Grocka Petrovčić Trešnja III zona Begaljica Guncate Progar Vojka Belegiš Ivanovo Ripanj Zabrežje 1,290.00 Boljevci Kačarevo Rucka Brđani Karlovčić Rvati Brestovik Krnješevci Sremčica Arnajevo Ljubinić Popović Šepšin Ašanja
    [Show full text]
  • Nouvelles Agro-Agri De Serbie
    N°7 – Mars 2020 De l’autre côté de l’UE- Nouvelles Agro-agri de Serbie Agriculture et agroalimentaire Cette lettre agro n°7 vous propose un retour sur les principales informations agri-agro pour la Serbie pour les derniers mois. Elle a pour objectif de faire le suivi des évolutions du secteur aussi bien dans le domaine de la politique agricole, des politiques alimentaires et sanitaires que des informations sectorielles et principaux investissements. N’hésitez pas à nous faire part de vos remarques et suggestions ! Table des matières De l’autre côté de l’UE- ..................................................................................................................... 1 1. Politique agricole nationale serbe et partenariats commerciaux .......................................... 2 Octobre 2019 - Le ministre de l’agriculture Nemidovic annonce l’exportation de viande de veaux vers la Turquie ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Octobre 2019 - Le ministre de l’agriculture Nemidonic annonce la publication des prix anticipés et la création d’un registre d’acheteurs ........................................................................................................... 3 Octobre 2019 - Un accord de libre-échange entre la Serbie et l’EAEU (Union économique eurasienne) va accroître les échanges avec la Russie ................................................................................................. 3 Novembre 2019 - Le ministère
    [Show full text]