Belarus 1999

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Belarus 1999 The National Human sibility for the opinions Development Report expressed in this doc- for 1999 was produced ument and the accu- with the organisational racy of the data pre- and technical support sented in it. The of the UN/UNDP views expressed in Office in Belarus this publication are under the auspices of exclusively those of the the UNDP project authors and are not neces- BYE/96/004/C/01/99 sarily shared by the United "Strengthening the System to Nations, the UN Development Prepare National Human Deve- Programme, or the organisations lopment Reports in the Republic with which the authors are affiliat- of Belarus . This is the fifth ed. national report. Its preparation This_ edition is not protected by involved Belarus national co-ordi- copyright and may be reproduced nators and contributors to the pre- without the prior permission of vious reports, as well as a number the UNDP, providing that the of independent experts. source is acknowledged. The authors assume full respon- Comments and further information can be obtained at the following address: UNITED NATIONS OFFICE IN THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS 17, Kirov Street, sixth floor 220000 Minsk, Republic of Belarus Tel: (375-17) 2278149 Fax: (375-17) 2260340 E-mail: [email protected] WWW Home Page: http://www.un.minsk.by/hdr/hdr99 ISBN 985-6493-02-1 Head of publishing team: Nadezda Kupchenya Design: Igor Demkovsky Editors: Nadezda Kupchenya, Olga Beliaevskaya Computer layout: Sergei Kozyrefr English translation: Alexander Piskoimov Printed in Belarus by Tarpey Printing House Foreword We present the fifth National Human Development Report. It covers the events of 1998 and discusses the transition to sustainable development during the last five years. 1998 was a difficult year for the government and people. Despite a number of positive devel- opments in the economy, social sector and environment, the nation faced some difficulties, especially in the second half of the year, caused mainly by the financial crisis that affected the global economy and the CIS. However, as a result of meaningful efforts by (he government and NGOs, the nation has succeeded in maintaining economic growth, increasing investments in the manufacturing sector and boosting real incomes. However, starting from the third quarter of 1998, output growth slowed down considerably, accompanied by a reduction in economic efficiency. This development affected all components of the macroeconomic infrastructure. The GDP growth rate slowed down from 12% in the first half of 1997 to 6% in the third quarter and 5% in the last quarter of 1998, relative to similar peri- ods of the previous year. The average rate of GDP growth in 1998 was 8%, which conforms to the annual target. Industrial output gained 13.5% in the first half of 1998, 6.0% in the third quar- ter and 11.0% in the last quarter of 1998, averaging 11.0%, and capital investments 29%, 21.4% and 16%, respectively. The consumer price index grew 2.8 times relative to December 1997, and the rouble-to-dollar exchange rate more than 2.5 times. Foreign trade turnover gained 13.9% in the first half of 1998. However, by the end of 1998, it had fallen 2.9% relative to the end of the previous year. However, as a result of concerted and well-targeted efforts by the state, the socio-economic development targets were met in almost all areas, with the exception of agricultural output, housing construction, foreign trade turnover and rate of inflation. In foreign policies, the adoption of a declaration of unity of Belarus and Russia on December 25,1998 was the crucial event of the past year. The report addresses sustainable development issues and state sustainable development poli- cies against the background of these events. Similar to the previous reports, it has been pre- pared by a group of independent local experts, whose views do not necessarily represent the position of the Belarusian government. It should also be mentioned that the previous reports were well received by the public and have played an important role in involving large numbers of academics and professionals in the debate on sustainable development. It is hoped that this National Report will be positively received by the state institutions and NGOs and contribute to Belarus' transition to sustainable development. Minsk, April 1999 Vladimir Shimov, Minister of Economy of the Republic of Belarus 3 Authors Vladimir Shimov - National Coordinator, Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Minister of Economy of the Republic of Belarus Lev Krukov - Project Manager, Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Academician (Belarus Academy of Engineering), Director of the Institute of Economic Research of the Ministry of Economy ON CHAPTER CONTRIBUTORS: Anatoly Bogdanovich - Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Deputy Director of the Institute of Economic Research of the Ministry of Economy (chapters 2.7, 3.1, 3.3, 4.1, scientific editing) Ivan Basetsky - Doctor of Sciences (Law), Professor, Deputy Director of Belarus Police Academy (fighting crime and coraiption) Calina Casuk - Deputy Minister of Statistics and Analysis (chapter 1.3, supplement, statis- tical support) Ruslan Crebennikov - Doctor of Sciences (Sociology), Professor of Belarus University of Culture (national and cultural policies) Irina lodo - Doctor of Sciences (Architecture), Academician-Secretary of Belarus Academy of Architecture, Professor of Belarus State Polytechnical Academy (Chapter 1.1, 1.2, 2.8) Lev Krukov -Candidate of Sciences (Economics) Academician (Belarus Academy of Engineering), Director of the Institute of Economic Research of the Ministry of Economy (introduction, chapters 1.1,1.2, 2.9. scientific editing) Cennady Lych - Doctor or Sciences (Economics), lead research specialist of the Institute of Economics of the National Academy of Sciences (chapters 1.1,1.2, national policies during globalisation) Eduard Matulis - Candidate of Sciences (Technology), Advisor/Consultant of the Economic Department of the Presidential Administration (chapters 2.5, 4.2) Antonina Morova - Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Head of the Economic Department of the Presidential Administration (chapter 2.3) Svetlana IMaumova - Candidate of Sciences (Philosophy),Lecturer of the Belarus Institute of Higher Education (chapter 2.4) Victor Pinigin - Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Deputy Director of the institute of Economic research of the Ministry of Economy (chapters 1/i, 1.5. 2.2) Alexander Podluzhny - Doctor of Sciences (Linguistics), Director of Yakub Kolas Institute of Linguistics, Academician/Secretary of the Department of Arts and Humanities of the National Academy of Science (language policies) Ivan Udovenko - Candidate of Sciences (Philosophy), Deputy Director of the Institute of Economic Research of the Ministry of Economy (chapters2.1, 2.5, 3.2) Kseniya Khachatryants - Candidate of Sciences (Architecture), lecturer at Belarus State Polytechnical Academy (housing policy) Calina Shaton - Candidate of Sciences, Vice Rector of the Non-State Women's Institute "Envila" (chapter 2.4) Ludmila Shakhotko - Doctor of Sciences (Sociology), Deputy Director of the Institute of Statistics of the Ministry of Statistics and Analysis (population migration) BOXES: Yuri Vlaskin -Department Manager of the National Bank (I.S.I) Leonid Zaiko - Candidate of Sciences (Economics), President, National Centre for Strategic Research (2.2.1) Ludmila Litvinova - Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Lecturer of Belarus State University of Economics (2.3.4) Yevgeni Shirokov - Correspondent Member of the International Academy of Environment, President of the Belarusian chapter of the International Academy of Environment (2.7.1) Alexander Piskounov - Translator Brian Anderson - Style Editor 4 Table of contents Foreword 3 Authors 4 Introduction 7 Chapter 1. Sustainable human development of Belarus - a five-year record 8 1.1. National Human Development Reports - oveview of approaches 8 1.2. Role of the National Reports in public education and state policies 12 1.3. Human Development Index in dynamics 15 1.4. A socially oriented market economy as the basis of .sustainable human development .........16 1.5. The impact of the global financial crisis on the socio-economic situation in Belarus 18 Chapter 2. Trends and dynamics of the key human development indicators; government policies 22 2.1. Demographic policies 22 Fertility .22 Life expectancy 24 Public heath 24 Migration 25 2.2. Economic policy 27 Ownership reform 28 Development of private enterprise 29 Labour reform 30 The role of the state in the transitional economy 32 2.3. Social policies 35 Popular living standards and quality of life 35 Poverty 35 The impact of the financial crisis on the vulnerable groups of the population 37 Social insurance and pension support 38 Employment policies; job creation and support for the unemployed 40 Social rehabilitation for people who have suffered from the Chernobyl nuclear accident . .41 2.4. Gender policy 41 Women's involvement in politics 44 2.5. Education and science policies 46 Education 46 Science and technology 47 2.6. Ethnic and cultural policies 49 Language policy 52 2.7. Environmental policy 54 Exploitation of natural resources and environmental protection 55 Overcoming the effects of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster 56 Environmental education 57 2.8. Creation of a favourable living environment 59 The living enviroment: definition and problems 59 Entering the world community 59 The number of settlements has not changed significantly. Is this good or bad? 60 Qualitative changes in the living enviroment 61 Roads of the future 62 Housing policy 63 2.9. Building a civil society and fighting crime 64 Combating crime and corruption 67 Chapter 3. International partnership for sustainable development 69 3.1. Belarus and the world 69 3.2. Foreign trade policies in the wake of globalization 70 3.3. Sustainable development initiatives of the Republic of Belarus 73 Chapter 4. Looking into the future 76 4.1. Human development objectives in the new millennium 76 4.2. Transition to a post-industrial society 77 Appendix 80 5 List of boxes, figures and tables Boxes: 1.5.1. The impact of the crisis in Russia on the Belarusian economy 20 2.2.1.
Recommended publications
  • Investment and Trade Policy of the Republic of Belarus
    INVESTMENT AND TRADE POLICY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS Igor Ugorich Head of Department, Foreign Trade Administration, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Belarus Globalisation creates a situation where the conflicts in certain regions directly affect the global state of affairs. From this perspective, developments in the 21st Century will be largely influenced by processes taking shape in the whole world. Multi-ethnic and multi-confessional Belarus has avoided the religious and ethnic conflicts so characteristic of many post-Soviet countries. Organised government management and law-enforcement systems have allowed us to ensure an adequate level of security for our society and people. The strategy of economic development, priorities and the stages of reformation of the economy of Belarus are based on the so-called “Belarusan model” of development, which is a socially orientated market economy stipulated by the Constitution and with regard to the place and the role of our state in the world community. Reformation of the Belarusan economy started in 1991 after the dissolution of the USSR. The current stage of reformation and development started in 1994-1995 and is connected with cardinal changes in the economic policy of the state carried out before. Belarus looked for its own way of development in the years of crisis, one based on a sound pragmatic and practical understanding of world experience, taking into account particular internal problems and the general situation in the world. How should one build a programme of economic development? To ensure financial stabilisation at the cost of a drastic tightening of monetary and credit policy which would limit purchasing power (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Belarus Factor” from Balancing to Bridging Geopolitical Dividing Lines in Europe?
    The “Belarus factor” From balancing to bridging geopolitical dividing lines in Europe? Clingendael Report Tony van der Togt The “Belarus factor” From balancing to bridging geopolitical dividing lines in Europe? Tony van der Togt Clingendael Report January 2017 January 2017 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Cover photo: The leaders of Belarus, Russia, Germany, France and Ukraine after signing the Minsk II agreement, February 2015. © In Terris Online Newspaper Unauthorized use of any materials violates copyright, trademark and / or other laws. Should a user download material from the website or any other source related to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, or the Clingendael Institute, for personal or non-commercial use, the user must retain all copyright, trademark or other similar notices contained in the original material or on any copies of this material. Material on the website of the Clingendael Institute may be reproduced or publicly displayed, distributed or used for any public and non-commercial purposes, but only by mentioning the Clingendael Institute as its source. Permission is required to use the logo of the Clingendael Institute. This can be obtained by contacting the Communication desk of the Clingendael Institute ([email protected]). The following web link activities are prohibited by the Clingendael Institute and may present trademark and copyright infringement issues: links that involve unauthorized use of our logo, framing, inline links, or metatags, as well as hyperlinks or a form of link disguising the URL. About the author Tony van der Togt is Senior Research Fellow at the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ in The Hague.
    [Show full text]
  • 1120 Not-So-Good Neighbors
    Commission on Security & Cooperation in Europe: U.S. Helsinki Commission “Not-So-Good Neighbors: Russian Influence in Belarus” Committee Members Present: Representative Alcee Hastings (D-FL), Chairman; Representative Joe Wilson (R-SC), Ranking Member; Witnesses: Sofya Orlosky, Senior Program Manager for Eurasia, Freedom House; Franak Viačorka, Research Media Analyst, US Agency for Global Media; Brian Whitmore, Senior Fellow and Director of the Russia Program, CEPA; Andrei Yeliseyeu, Head of Monitoring Unit, International Strategic Action Network for Security (iSANS); Research Director, EAST Center The Hearing Was Held From 9:58 a.m. To 11:28 a.m. in Room 2200, Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, D.C., Representative Alcee Hastings (D- FL), Chairman, Commission for Security and Cooperation in Europe, presiding Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 Transcript By Superior Transcriptions LLC www.superiortranscriptions.com HASTINGS: Good morning, everybody. It’s 10:00, and I have a bad habit of trying to start on time and end on time. You are welcome here to the U.S. Helsinki Commission hearing entitled “Not-So-Good Neighbors: Russian Influence in Belarus.” And with that, we’ll come to order and have opening statements and then turn to you all. This is a timely hearing coming off of the Belarusian election, in addition to the fact that I know all of you know that there is an ongoing proceeding that Russia is implicated in here on the Hill that is much more popular for the moment. We all know that the Kremlin’s disinformation and political interference reaches the shores of the United States and elsewhere in the region of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Performance Review of Belarus
    United Nations Economic Commission for Europe INNOVATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF BELARUS UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2011 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ECE/CECI/11 Copyright © United Nations, 2011 All right reserved Printed at United Nations, Geneva (Switzerland) UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATIONS Sales No. 11.II.E.5 ISBN 978-92-1-117041-2 iii FOREWORD The Innovation Performance Review of Belarus initiates a new focus of activity for the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, which draws on the experience accumulated so far in the identification of good practices and policy lessons in the area of knowledge-based development. Innovation in the modern economy is influenced by the decisions of numerous stakeholders and depends on a multitude of factors. Public policies have a significant influence on innovation performance. Public intervention is necessary not only for creating favourable framework conditions and stimulating innovative activities but also for encouraging cooperative actions by innovation stakeholders and putting in place institutions and policy mechanisms that address different market failures in the innovation process. An assessment of the national innovation system, which takes into account both the international experiences and the local needs, opportunities and constraints, is a basic precondition for the development of effective evidence-based policies. This Review presents the main outcomes of a participatory policy advisory exercise undertaken at the request of the Government of the Republic of Belarus.
    [Show full text]
  • BELARUS: Economy at a Crossroads
    BELARUS 1 Forecast Report / Autumn 2014 BELARUS: Economy at a crossroads RUMEN DOBRINSKY Growth in Belarus was sluggish in the first half of 2014. It seems, however, that a modest upturn has now set in; it should contribute to an average GDP growth of close to 2% for the year as a whole. At present, policy is focused on preserving a teetering macroeconomic equilibrium, which is being bolstered by mobilising short-term external financial resources. This course is likely to linger on up until the presidential elections scheduled for mid-2015, the outcome of which will play a key role in determining the country’s political landscape. Growth in Belarus was sluggish in the first half of 2014 but a modest upturn seems to be underway. In the course of the year, economic activity has been reviving, albeit at a slow pace: after a sluggish 0.9% year-on-year rate of growth in the first quarter, GDP growth picked up to 1.6% in the second quarter resulting in a 1.2% average rate for the first half of the year. Recent monthly indicators suggest that growth continued to pick up momentum in the third quarter. On the supply side, good performance in the services sector (apart from construction) contributed to aggregate growth. After a downturn that continued for a year and a half, industrial production also seems about to turn the corner. On the demand side, private consumption provided a modest boost to economic activity, supported by a continued rise in real incomes, while fixed investment experienced a downturn.
    [Show full text]
  • Zbwleibniz-Informationszentrum
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Liuhto, Kari; Heikkilä, Marika; Laaksonen, Eini Article Political risk for foreign firms in the Western CIS: An analysis on Belarus, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine Journal for East European Management Studies Provided in Cooperation with: Rainer Hampp Verlag Suggested Citation: Liuhto, Kari; Heikkilä, Marika; Laaksonen, Eini (2009) : Political risk for foreign firms in the Western CIS: An analysis on Belarus, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine, Journal for East European Management Studies, ISSN 0949-6181, Rainer Hampp Verlag, Mering, Vol. 14, Iss. 4, pp. 395-407 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/84015 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been
    [Show full text]
  • Final Results of Changed Circumstances Reviews Regarding Belarus’ Status As a Non-Market Economy Country
    A-822-804, A-822-806 CCR – NME Graduation Public Document E&C/OII: AKM October 16, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: Jeffrey I. Kessler Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance THROUGH: James Maeder Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations Joseph A. Laroski Jr. Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy & Negotiations Alexander B. Hammer Director and Senior Economist Economic Analysis Unit, Office of Policy FROM: Christopher Loopesko Economist Economic Analysis Unit, Office of Policy SUBJECT: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Reviews Regarding Belarus’ Status as a Non-Market Economy Country I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Department of Commerce (Commerce) concludes that Belarus is a non-market economy (NME) country, based on the fact that its economy does not primarily operate on market principles. The Belarusian government’s role in the economy and its relationship with markets and the private sector not only lead to fundamental distortions and allocative efficiency problems, but also affect Belarusian costs or pricing structures that are necessary for Commerce’s antidumping analyses. Commerce’s overall conclusion is based upon its analysis of six factors established in U.S. law. In determining whether a country is an NME under section 771(18)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), section 771(18)(B) requires that Commerce take into account: (1) the extent to which the currency of the foreign country is convertible into the currency of other countries; (2) the extent to which wage rates in the foreign country are determined by free bargaining between labor and management; (3) the extent to which joint ventures or other investments by firms of other foreign countries are permitted in the foreign country; (4) the extent of government ownership or control of the means of production; (5) the extent of government control over the allocation of resources and over the price and output decisions of enterprises; and (6) such other factors as the administering authority (i.e., Commerce) considers appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Image of Russia and Belarus Formed in the Union State Print Media (And Their Electronic Analogues)
    Journal of Social Studies Education Research Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi 2020:11 (1), 254-266 www.jsser.org Analysis of the Image of Russia and Belarus Formed in The Union State Print Media (And Their Electronic Analogues) Nadezhda Vinogradova1 Abstract High-quality print press of Russia and Belarus is actively involved in the coverage of the communication process between these countries. At the present stage the legacy of the Soviet Union continues to influence on interaction between the countries. Both countries form their own identity on the basis of patriotism and love for their Homeland. These trends have a negative impact on the development of the Union State, as neither side is ready to sacrifice its identity, which will inevitably lead to a change in the format of relations. The aim of the study is to identify the image of Russia formed in the quality press of the Republic of Belarus, and the image of Belarus formed by the quality press of Russia. The author reveals the image of the country, which consists of a spatial image, the image of the population, the image of power and the image of the leader. The formation of the image is influenced by object, subject, spatial, temporal and communication factors. The analysis uses cognitive, behavioral, and emotional positions. Empirical base of research: during the study publications for the period 2015-2019 of three Russian newspapers – “Rossiyskaya Gazeta”, “Kommersant”, “Vedomosti” and three Belarusian newspapers – “Belarus today”, “Belgazeta”, “Belarusian business newspaper” were analyzed with method of qualitative and quantitative content analysis. For the quantitative analysis 11 462 messages in the qualitative press of the Union State were considered.
    [Show full text]
  • The IT Industry in Belarus: 2017 and Beyond THIS REPORT CONTAINS INFORMATION AS of 30 APRIL 2017 the IT INDUSTRY in BELARUS:  01 2017 and Beyond
    The IT Industry in Belarus: 2017 and Beyond THIS REPORT CONTAINS INFORMATION AS OF 30 APRIL 2017 THE IT INDUSTRY IN BELARUS: 01 2017 and Beyond CONTENTS Foreword 02 Labor market 40 Partnerships with Summary 42 technological companies 89 Executive summary 04 Demographics and regional Certification 90 Brief information about distribution 42 Personnel 90 the Republic of Belarus 08 Age structure 44 English language skills 93 General information 10 Supply and demand on Business environment 93 Visa-free travel 10 the IT labor market 44 Raising finance 96 Population 10 Employee turnover 47 Sources 96 Transport and communications 10 Distribution by age and length of service 48 Development centers opened Doing Business 11 by international companies Salaries in the IT industry 50 Economy 11 in the Republic of Belarus 97 Total labor costs 55 Foreign investments 13 Labor resources by gender Recent landmark Foreign trade 13 in the IT industry 55 transactions and events 100 The IT industry’s role in Belarus 14 Proficiency in foreign languages 57 Sources 15 Belarus in international Sources 57 IT rankings 106 Information about the Global Outsourcing 100 106 Infra structure 58 IT industry 16 Software 500 107 Summary 60 Summary 18 Everest Group MAP Matrix™ Office premises and other Employment in the ICT sector 19 for IT applications 108 utility expenses 61 Key ICT performance indicators 20 Sources 108 The ICT Development Index 61 Business of Hi-Tech Park residents 22 Internet access 62 Recent mentions of the Role of the Hi-Tech Park Mobile-cellular communications
    [Show full text]
  • Friction Or Fiction? the Gas Factor in Russian–Belarusian Relations
    RUSSIA AND EURASIA PROGRAMME REP BP 05/01 MAY 2005 Friction or Fiction? The Gas Factor in Russian–Belarusian Relations Chloë Bruce, University of Vienna Summary • Throughout the post-Soviet period natural gas relations between Belarus and Russia have been chronically interwoven with political issues – in particular the proposed union of the two countries. Russia has supplied Belarus with heavily subsidized gas in exchange for military concessions and political loyalty. • Despite a number of conveniently timed accords signed during theYeltsin era, the Russian–Belarusian Union has remained largely academic. • Putin, however, has proved more pragmatic than his predecessor, presenting his Belarusian counterpart with a stark choice: integration on Russian terms or higher gas prices. • Given Belarus’s transit role for Russian gas exports to Europe, these political issues have important implications for supply security. • They also shed light on the way in which Russian foreign policy is made and the relationship between the government and the state-owned gas monopoly Gazprom – an issue of strategic concern given the government’s current clampdown on the BRIEFING PAPER BRIEFING PAPER energy industry. 2 Friction or Fiction? The Gas Factor in Russian–Belarusian Relations Sensitivity is the cost of modifications or cessation of Introduction transactions between countries within the original policy framework.3 Vulnerability is the cost of these The Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko – changed transactions once remedial measures have 4 known for his outlandish comments – reputedly said: been taken. Since bringing alternative supplies on- ‘Belarus’s unique situation lies in the fact I am indebted stream takes time – leaving the consumer without gas to no one.’1 His words are not without a modicum of for a protracted period – the vulnerability in natural truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus: Comparative Research on Industrial Parks and Special Economic Zones
    November 2018 Belarus: Comparative Research on Industrial Parks and Special Economic Zones Prepared by Dzmitry Kolkin for the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Table of contents Acknowledgements 2 Executive summary 3 Chapter 1: Introduction 7 Chapter 2: Regulatory framework and performance of FEZs in Belarus 12 Chapter 3: Regulatory framework and performance of the High-Tech Park 37 Chapter 4: Regulatory framework and development of the Great Stone 47 Industrial Park Appendix 1: Architecture of official collaboration between Belarus and China 58 Appendix 2: Comparison of incentives of economic regimes 59 Appendix 3: Structure of management of FEZs 63 Appendix 4: Brief information on integration of the HTP in the local economy 64 Appendix 5: Comparison of some economic indicators taken per employee 65 of respective regime Appendix 6: The Great Stone Industrial Park collaboration structure 67 Appendix 7: List of residents of the Great Stone Industrial Park 68 References 71 1 Acknowledgements This report is part of a project studying the This report benefits greatly from the guidance of establishment of Chinese development zones counterparts from China’s Center for International and industrial parks in countries of the Belt and Knowledge on Development (CIKD), including Road Initiative. This joint research collaboration Mr Sen Gong, Ms Xiheng Jiang, Mr Taidong Zhou includes China’s Center for International Knowledge and Ms Yu Zhou. It also benefited from the open on Development (CIKD), the European Bank for and frank exchanges and comments from the Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), the World independent research community of Belarus during Bank, the United Nations Industrial Development roundtable discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Support Services for Sme Competitiveness in Belarus
    Policy Insights POLICY INSIGHTS POLICY EFFECTIVE SUPPORT SERVICES FOR SME COMPETITIVENESS IN BELARUS Effective Support Services . EFFECTIVE SUPPORT SERVICES FOR SME COMPETITIVENESS IN BELARUS IN COMPETITIVENESS SME FOR SERVICES EFFECTIVE SUPPORT The OECD and the Ministry of Economy of Belarus have worked together on strengthening SME capabilities through better business development services (BDS). In 2017, the OECD made a series for SME Competitiveness of recommendations that focused on upgrading the institutional framework for the delivery of BDS, unlocking the latent demand for them, and promoting their market-orientated supply. Based in Belarus on joint work with the Ministry of Economy, this note summarises the key findings of the OECD assessment of Belarus’s progress in implementing the 2017 recommendations, noting especially the progress in enhancing the institutional framework. Further, the note puts forward additional recommendations for the continued support of SMEs, including guidelines for a possible future programme to provide targeted support for high-growth SMEs. www.oecd.org/eurasia GLOBAL RELATIONS Eurasia Competitiveness Programme This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the member countries of the OECD. This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Please cite this publication as: OECD(2020), Effective Support Services for SME Competitiveness in Belarus, OECD Publishing, Paris, www.oecd.org/eurasia/competitiveness-programme/eastern-partners/Effective-Support-Services-for- SME-Competitiveness-in-Belarus-ENG.pdf.
    [Show full text]