DOCSLIB.ORG

Fisher, Memories of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fisher, Memories of The UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Memories of the Ark: Texts, Objects, and the Construction of the Biblical Past Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6k93c4k2 Author Fisher, Daniel Shalom Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Memories of the Ark: Texts, Objects, and the Construction of the Biblical Past By Daniel Shalom Fisher A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ronald Hendel, Chair Professor Robert Alter Professor Benjamin Porter Professor Daniel Boyarin Professor Ann Swidler Summer 2018 Copyright © 2018 by Daniel Shalom Fisher, All Rights Reserved. 1 Abstract Memories of the Ark: Texts, Objects, and the Construction of the Biblical Past by Daniel Shalom Fisher Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Ronald Hendel, Chair This dissertation constructs a cultural biography of the Ark of the Covenant, exploring through it the close, but often complicated, relationships that have existed between objects and collective memory in Biblical and ancient Jewish societies. The project considers the different ways in which Biblical writers and interpreters have remembered the Ark as a “real thing,” forming it, mobilizing it, and making meaning with it—largely in its absence after its likely loss in the 6th century BCE. From Exodus to Chronicles and in works of biblical interpretation through the Mishnah, this project explores how these writers reimagine the Ark to craft visions for their people’s future through their people’s past. The project is structured around five interrelated case studies from the Ark’s mnemohistory, considering different dimensions of cultural memory’s entanglement in material culture. Each case study draws upon and enriches text-, source-, and redaction-critical approaches, investigating the growth and reshaping of biblical writings as creative memory work. Chapter 1 discusses the dynamics of texts, cultural memory and material culture in biblical literature with particular focus on Jer 3, where a textualf expansion to an early prophetic oracle calls on Israel to forget the Ark. Chapters 2 and 3 consider the contrasting narratives of the Ark’s construction in Deuteronomy (10:1–5, 8–9; 31:25–27) and Priestly writings (Exod 16:34–36; 25; 37; Lev 16; Num 7:89; 17:21–28). The two different contexts that these documents provide for the Ark empower it as a real thing to metonymically represent two different versions of the past, enabling its use as a symbol by Priestly writings and Deuteronomy in the realization of their contrasting visions of Israel’s present and future. Chapter 4 focuses on the literary growth and revision of biblical writings as memory work, analyzing three editions of the Ark’s installation in the Temple: 1 Kgs 8, 3 Kgdms 8, and 2 Chr 5. Chapters 5 and 6 explore considerations of the Ark’s loss in the Ark Narrative (AN; 1 Sam 4:1b–7:1) and ancient Jewish and Rabbinic writings. Chapter 5 focuses on AN, which tells the story of the Ark’s (temporary) loss in battle to the Philistines. While the Ark’s triumphant return to Israel in AN implies that the Ark was not truly lost, the text makes the Ark’s loss thinkable. Chapter 6 explores reactions to the Ark’s loss in ancient Jewish and early Rabbinic writings. The Hebrew Bible is curiously silent on the Ark’s 2 fate. Midrashic ancient Jewish and Rabbinic interpretation fill this lacuna by positing the Ark’s survival and imminent return in the End Times. This apocalyptic deferral of the Temple’s ultimate restoration capitalizes upon the Ark’s presumed reality and absence. As memories of the Ark shift towards the apocalyptic future, “old things” like the Ark continue to occupy central roles in the self-fashioning of biblical societies. This dissertation explores the ways and forms that the lost Ark lives on in biblical societies: its lives, its afterlives, and the broad relationships between cultural memories and material culture that underlie all aspects of religious life. i For Dana ii CONTENTS TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... v ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... ix 1. REMEMBERING WITH THE ARK ......................................................................................... 1 I. History of Scholarship .............................................................................................................. 4 I.1 Select Historical and Literary Approaches to the Ark ........................................................ 5 I.2. Remembering the Ark in the Hebrew Bible and Ancient Biblical Interpretation .............. 9 II. Objects, Absence, and the Construction of Lieux de Mémoire ............................................. 10 II.1. Material and Non-material Lieux de Mémoire ............................................................... 14 III. Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 20 2. CONSTRUCTING THE ARK, CONTESTING ISRAEL I: THE ARK IN DEUTERONOMY ....................................................................................................................................................... 22 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 23 II. The Ark in Deuteronomy ...................................................................................................... 24 III. Cultic Innovation and Memory in Deuteronomy ................................................................ 25 IV. Mnemohistory: Deuteronomy and the Elohistic (E) Stratum of Exod 34:1–28 .................. 28 IV.1. The Itinerary Fragment in Deut 10:6–7 ........................................................................ 31 IV.2. The J Theophany and Prayer (Exod 34: 2–3, 4, 5aβ–9, 27) .......................................... 32 IV.3. The Legal Collection in Exod 34:10–26 ....................................................................... 33 IV.4. The E Stratum of Exod 34:1–28 and Deuteronomy’s Ark ............................................ 34 IV.5. Preliminary Conclusions on the Mnemohistory of the Ark in Deut 10:1–5, 8–9 ......... 40 V. Poetics of the Representation of the Ark in Deuteronomy ................................................... 40 V.1. The Ark, the Tablets, and Deuteronomy’s Legal Collection ......................................... 41 V.1.a. Why the Law? Deut 31 and Moses’s Law ............................................................... 42 V.2. The Ark and Moses ........................................................................................................ 44 V.3. The Ark and Horeb ......................................................................................................... 46 V.4. The Ark and the Calf ...................................................................................................... 48 V.4.a. The Calf as a Lieu de Mémoire in Deuteronomy ..................................................... 49 V.4.b. The Ark and the Calf, Inverted Lieux de Mémoire .................................................. 51 VI. Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 52 3. CONSTRUCTING THE ARK, CONTESTING ISRAEL II: THE ARK IN PRIESTLY WRITINGS ................................................................................................................................... 54 I. The Ark in P: An Overview and Interpretive Key ................................................................. 55 iii I.1. Notes on the Date of P ..................................................................................................... 59 I.2. Notes on P and Priestly Ritual as Memory Work ............................................................ 60 II. The Commission, Construction, and Contribution of the Ark in P ...................................... 61 II.1. The Commission and Construction of the Ark in P ........................................................ 61 II.1.a. The Ark and its kappōreṯ in Exod 25 and 37 ............................................................ 63 II.1.a.i. Differences between the MT and LXX of Exod 35–40 ...................................... 64 II.1.a.ii. Physical Properties of the Priestly Ark .............................................................. 65 II.1.a.iii. Inside the Ark: The ʿēḏuṯ .................................................................................. 66 II.1.b. The Priestly Ark and the Power of Description ....................................................... 68 II.2. The Ark and the Revelation of the Priestly Ritual System ............................................. 69 III. The Jar and the Staff: Before the ʿēḏuṯ, Before YHWH ..................................................... 72 III.1. The Ark and the Jar of Manna ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geberit's Building Technology and Acoustics Laboratory the Cave Art
    Know- how Customer Magazine December 2017 20 years Geberit’s Building Technology and Acoustics Laboratory 15,000 years The cave art of Lascaux document553997946950109986.indd 1 13.12.2017 09:09:53 Know-how runs through everything we do. Publisher Geberit Southern Africa (Pty.) Ltd. 6 Meadowview Lane Meadowview Business Estate Longmeadow, Linbro Park ZA-Johannesburg Phone +27 11 444 50 70 Fax +27 11 656 34 55 [email protected] → www.geberit.co.za Number of copies Issued: quarterly. The reproduction of individual articles, in part or in full, is subject to approval from the editorial staff. Photos Ben Huggler (cover picture, page 16, back page) Sergio Grazia (pages 22–23) Michael Suter (pages 10–13) Tribecraft (pages 14–15, 17) On the cover Vibrometric sensors are positioned in order to analyse sound transmissions. 2 document8739697254805857473.indd 2 13.12.2017 09:09:46 Contents A company on the move Ten years Geberit Southern Africa 18 Long-lasting pleasure Products & solutions 14 News/Agenda 5 Building Technology and Acoustics Laboratory 6 Mapress Carbon Steel 10 Online bathroom planner 13 Reference object 22 Diese Schwitzwasser-Isolation wirkt sich überall vor- 26-28 dB (A) leise, nach DIN 52218. teilhaft aus, jedoch besonders in Gegenden mit kaltem GEBERIT* Wasser oder mit hoher Luftfeuchtigkeit, bei stark gebert + cie frequentierten Klosettanlagen sowie in innenliegenden Armaturen-und Apparatefabrik WC-Räumen. Zudem trägt sie dazu bei, daß der bekannt JJJj^j§^omT" am Zürichsee leise GEBERIT-Spülkasten noch leiser wurde, genau: Telex75625 Once upon a time <-:.: Diese Schwitzwasser-Isolation wirkt sich überall vor- 26-28 dB (A) leise, nach DIN 52218.
    [Show full text]
  • Bible Challenge 2014 Going Deeper – Questions for Readings Week 6
    Bible Challenge 2014 Going Deeper – Questions for Readings Week 6 What is the covenant that is made between God and the Israelites at Mount Sinai? What does God promise the Israelites? What do the Israelites promise God? How do the Ten Commandments fit into this covenant agreement? (Exodus 19:1-20:17; 23:23-24:8) List the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:1-17). What is the meaning and purpose of each commandment? Which commandment or commandments do you find easiest to obey and follow? Why? Which are the most difficult for you to obey and follow? Why? How does God appear to the Israelites on Mount Sinai? How do they react to God’s presence? How does this impact the relationship between God and the Israelites? (Exodus 20:18-20) Why do you think the laws in Exodus 21-23 (which follow the Ten Commandments) are so detailed in nature? What would they have meant for the Israelites who came out of slavery in Egypt? What, if anything, do these laws mean for you today? Was there one particular law in these chapters that caught your attention more than some of the others? Why? What are the three festivals that the Israelites are supposed to hold each year (Exodus 23:14-19)? What is the purpose of each festival? What is the Tabernacle? Why was it so important to the Israelite community in the wilderness? Why do you think the instructions for its construction were so detailed? Who was allowed in the Tabernacle? Why? Who was not allowed in the Tabernacle? Why? (Exodus 25-29) What is contained in the Ark of the Covenant (Exodus 25:10-16)? What was the purpose
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did God Smite Uzzah?
    Why did God smite Uzzah? The ark of the covenant had fallen into the hands of the Philistines (1 Sam 4–5), and David was finally bringing back the lost ark to Jerusalem. The festivities basically included a big parade with dancing, celebrating and a marching band. Suddenly, the cart carrying the ark shook as the oxen that were pulling it stumbled. Uzzah, one of the men walking alongside it, reached out to stabilize the ark, but Yahweh got angry at Uzzah and instantly killed him. God Behaving Badly: What prompted this divine display of rage? Wasn’t Uzzah doing a good Is the God of the Old thing by protecting the ark from tipping over? Surely whatever he was Testament Angry, doing didn’t deserve a death sentence. Why did God have to kill him? Even Sexist and Racist? David, a man after God’s own heart, got mad at Yahweh for the outburst. June 2011 Stories like this give the God of the Old Testament a bad reputation. $15, 205 pages, paper 978-0-8308-3826-4 While the story of Uzzah and the ark is deeply troubling, as we begin to examine the causes of God’s anger it becomes more understandable. Yahweh was angry here for three main reasons. Carrying the ark. First, Yahweh told the Israelites how to carry the ark, and they weren’t obeying. Yahweh told them that they were not to transport the ark on a cart, but it was to be carried by the priests on poles through rings on the side of the ark (Ex 25:10-15; Num 4:15; 7:7-9; Deut 10:8).
    [Show full text]
  • Fisher, Memories of The
    Memories of the Ark: Texts, Objects, and the Construction of the Biblical Past By Daniel Shalom Fisher A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ronald Hendel, Chair Professor Robert Alter Professor Benjamin Porter Professor Daniel Boyarin Professor Ann Swidler Summer 2018 Copyright © 2018 by Daniel Shalom Fisher, All Rights Reserved. 1 Abstract Memories of the Ark: Texts, Objects, and the Construction of the Biblical Past by Daniel Shalom Fisher Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Ronald Hendel, Chair This dissertation constructs a cultural biography of the Ark of the Covenant, exploring through it the close, but often complicated, relationships that have existed between objects and collective memory in Biblical and ancient Jewish societies. The project considers the different ways in which Biblical writers and interpreters have remembered the Ark as a “real thing,” forming it, mobilizing it, and making meaning with it—largely in its absence after its likely loss in the 6th century BCE. From Exodus to Chronicles and in works of biblical interpretation through the Mishnah, this project explores how these writers reimagine the Ark to craft visions for their people’s future through their people’s past. The project is structured around five interrelated case studies from the Ark’s mnemohistory, considering different dimensions of cultural memory’s entanglement in material culture. Each case study draws upon and enriches text-, source-, and redaction-critical approaches, investigating the growth and reshaping of biblical writings as creative memory work.
    [Show full text]
  • Exodus 202 1 Edition Dr
    Notes on Exodus 202 1 Edition Dr. Thomas L. Constable TITLE The Hebrew title of this book (we'elleh shemot) originated from the ancient practice of naming a Bible book after its first word or words. "Now these are the names of" is the translation of the first two Hebrew words. "The Hebrew title of the Book of Exodus, therefore, was to remind us that Exodus is the sequel to Genesis and that one of its purposes is to continue the history of God's people as well as elaborate further on the great themes so nobly introduced in Genesis."1 Exodus cannot stand alone, in the sense that the book would not make much sense without Genesis. The very first word of the book, translated "now," is a conjunction that means "and." The English title "Exodus" is a transliteration of the Greek word exodus, from the Septuagint translation, meaning "exit," "way out," or "departure." The Septuagint translators gave the book this title because of the major event in it, namely, the Israelites' departure from Egypt. "The exodus is the most significant historical and theological event of the Old Testament …"2 DATE AND WRITER Moses, who lived from about 1525 to 1405 B.C., wrote Exodus (17:14; 24:4; 34:4, 27-29). He could have written it, under the inspiration of the 1Ronald Youngblood, Exodus, pp. 9-10. 2Eugene H. Merrill, Kingdom of Priests, p. 57. Copyright Ó 2021 by Thomas L. Constable www.soniclight.com 2 Dr. Constable's Notes on Exodus 2021 Edition Holy Spirit, any time after the events recorded (after about 1444 B.C.).
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Archaeology 2(2) Fall 2006
    TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Volume 2 Fall 2006 Number 2 EDITORIAL COORDINATORS Michael C. Moore TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Tennessee Division of Archaeology Kevin E. Smith Middle Tennessee State University VOLUME 2 Fall 2006 NUMBER 2 EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE David Anderson 62 EDITORS CORNER University of T ennessee ARTICLES Patrick Cummins Alliance for Native American Indian Rights 63 The Archaeology of Linville Cave (40SL24), Boyce Driskell Sullivan County, Tennessee University of T ennessee JAY D. FRANKLIN AND S.D. DEAN Jay Franklin 83 Archaeological Investigations on Ropers East Tennessee State University Knob: A Fortified Civil War Site in Williamson County, Tennessee Patrick Garrow BENJAMIN C. NANCE Dandridge, Tennessee Zada Law 107 Deep Testing Methods in Alluvial Ashland City, Tennessee Environments: Coring vs. Trenching on the Nolichucky River Larry McKee SARAH C. SHERWOOD AND JAMES J. KOCIS TRC, Inc. Tanya Peres RESEARCH REPORTS Middle Tennessee State University 120 A Preliminary Analysis of Clovis through Sarah Sherwood Early Archaic Components at the Widemeier University of Tennessee Site (40DV9), Davidson County, Tennessee Samuel D. Smith JOHN BROSTER, MARK NORTON, BOBBY HULAN, Tennessee Division of Archaeology AND ELLIS DURHAM Guy Weaver Weaver and Associates LLC Tennessee Archaeology is published semi-annually in electronic print format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology. Correspondence about manuscripts for the journal should be addressed to Michael C. Moore, Tennessee Division of Archaeology, Cole Building #3, 1216 Foster Avenue, Nashville TN 37210. The Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology disclaims responsibility for statements, whether fact or of opinion, made by contributors. On the Cover: Ceramics from Linville Cave, Courtesy, Jay Franklin and S.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngoma Lungundu: an African Ark of the Covenant1
    102 Le Roux: Ngoma Lungundu OTE 22/1(2009), 102-125 Ngoma Lungundu: an African Ark of the Covenant1 MAGDEL LE ROUX (UNISA) ABSTRACT The Lemba in Southern Africa are a specific group with unique tra- ditions regarding Israelite origins. Their oral traditions also contain significant information on the leading role their priestly family played on their journey from the North into the Arabian Peninsula and eventually into Africa. They blazed their trail southwards into Africa as traders, with the ngoma lungundu (“the drum which thun- ders”) playing a very similar role to that of the Ark of the Covenant. Striking parallels between the two traditions as well as a possible link between these two narratives are scrutinised. This study shows how the Lemba have constructed their own set of beliefs around Biblical myths in the context of marginalisation among other Afri- can communities. Their oral culture constitutes their world-view and self-understanding or identity. It incorporates the role of oral traditions, history and historiography. One could draw parallels between orality in early Israelite and African religions. The recipro- city between orality and inscripturation of traditions yields valuable information regarding the possible development of traditions in the Old Testament. A INTRODUCTION In the spirit of the year of the drum in Africa (2008), this article celebrates the mysterious and fearsome role that the ngoma lungundu played in African tradi- tion. Bloomhill is convinced that “no other legend is so imbued with the mystic enthralment of African folklore as that of Ngoma Lungundu” (“the drum that thunders”; 1960:165). The Lemba2 in Southern Africa are a very specific group with unique traditions regarding Israelite extraction.
    [Show full text]
  • THRESHING FLOORS AS SACRED SPACES in the HEBREW BIBLE by Jaime L. Waters a Dissertation Submitted to the Johns Hopkins Universit
    THRESHING FLOORS AS SACRED SPACES IN THE HEBREW BIBLE by Jaime L. Waters A dissertation submitted to The Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland August 2013 © 2013 Jaime L. Waters All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Vital to an agrarian community’s survival, threshing floors are agricultural spaces where crops are threshed and winnowed. As an agrarian society, ancient Israel used threshing floors to perform these necessary activities of food processing, but the Hebrew Bible includes very few references to these actions happening on threshing floors. Instead, several cultic activities including mourning rites, divination rituals, cultic processions, and sacrifices occur on these agricultural spaces. Moreover, the Solomonic temple was built on a threshing floor. Though seemingly ordinary agricultural spaces, the Hebrew Bible situates a variety of extraordinary cultic activities on these locations. In examining references to threshing floors in the Hebrew Bible, this dissertation will show that these agricultural spaces are also sacred spaces connected to Yahweh. Three chapters will explore different aspects of this connection. Divine control of threshing floors will be demonstrated as Yahweh exhibits power to curse, bless, and save threshing floors from foreign attacks. Accessibility and divine manifestation of Yahweh will be demonstrated in passages that narrate cultic activities on threshing floors. Cultic laws will reveal the links between threshing floors, divine offerings and blessings. One chapter will also address the sociological features of threshing floors with particular attention given to the social actors involved in cultic activities and temple construction. By studying references to threshing floors as a collection, a research project that has not been done previously, the close relationship between threshing floors and the divine will be visible, and a more nuanced understanding of these spaces will be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Moses Meets God on the Mountain 10 – 16 OCT 2017
    Moses Meets God on the Mountain 10 – 16 OCT 2017 EX 19 - 40 Week 4 --- 46 Weeks to Go God reveals, through Moses, his law and how he is to be worshipped. The Mosaic covenant (the 10 commandments and the Book of the Covenant) reveal God’s justice and righteousness, basic principles of ethics and morality, people’s choice and responsibility, and God’s concern for the poor, helpless and oppressed. God’s desire to be present among his people is revealed in the construction and regulations regarding the tabernacle and worship. Exodus emphasizes God’s holiness.. The central character of this book, Moses, is the mediator between God and his people, pointing ahead to Christ our own great mediator. Weekly Reading Plan Outline Day 1: EX 19:1 – 21:36 The Covenant at Sinai (Days 1-7) Day 2: EX 22:1 – 24:18 Divine Worship (Days 2-7) Day 3: EX 25:1 – 27:21 God’s Glory (Day 7) Day 4: EX 28:1 – 29:46 Day 5: EX 30:1 – 32:35 Day 6: EX 33:1 – 35:35 Day 7: EX 36:1 – 40:38 Key Characters Key Locations Key Terms Moses Mt. Sinai Covenant Aaron The desert Ten Commandments The Tabernacle Tabernacle Joshua Priests The Israelites The Law Bezalel Sabbath Oholiab Holy, Holiness Offerings Book of the Covenant Ark of the Covenant Cloud of glory Key Verses You yourselves have seen what I did to Egypt and how I carried you on eagles’ wings and brought you to myself. Now the, if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be My own possession among all the peoples, for all the earth is Mine.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrogate Surfaces: a Contextual Interpretive Approach to the Rock Art of Uganda
    SURROGATE SURFACES: A CONTEXTUAL INTERPRETIVE APPROACH TO THE ROCK ART OF UGANDA by Catherine Namono The Rock Art Research Institute Department of Archaeology School of Geography, Archaeology & Environmental Studies University of the Witwatersrand A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2010 i ii Declaration I declare that this is my own unaided work. It is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. It has not been submitted before for any other degree or examination in any other university. Signed:……………………………….. Catherine Namono 5th March 2010 iii Dedication To the memory of my beloved mother, Joyce Lucy Epaku Wambwa To my beloved father and friend, Engineer Martin Wangutusi Wambwa To my twin, Phillip Mukhwana Wambwa and Dear sisters and brothers, nieces and nephews iv Acknowledgements There are so many things to be thankful for and so many people to give gratitude to that I will not forget them, but only mention a few. First and foremost, I am grateful to my mentor and supervisor, Associate Professor Benjamin Smith who has had an immense impact on my academic evolution, for guidance on previous drafts and for the insightful discussions that helped direct this study. Smith‘s previous intellectual contribution has been one of the corner stones around which this thesis was built. I extend deep gratitude to Professor David Lewis-Williams for his constant encouragement, the many discussions and comments on parts of this study. His invaluable contribution helped ideas to ferment.
    [Show full text]
  • Bitasion Les Habitations-Plantations Constituent Le Creuset Historique Et Symbolique Où Fut Fondu L’Alliage Original Que Sont Les Cultures Antillaises
    Kelly & Bérard Ouvrage dirigé par Bitasion Les habitations-plantations constituent le creuset historique et symbolique où fut fondu l’alliage original que sont les cultures antillaises. Elles sont le berceau des sociétés créoles contemporaines qui y ont puisé tant leur forte parenté que leur Bitasion - Archéologie des habitations-plantations des Petites Antilles diversité. Leur étude a été précocement le terrain de prédilection des historiens. Les archéologues antillanistes se consacraient alors plus volontiers à l’étude des sociétés précolombiennes. Ainsi, en dehors des travaux pionniers de J. Handler et F. Lange à la Barbade, c’est surtout depuis la fin des années 1980 qu’un véritable développement de l’archéologie des habitations-plantations antillaises a pu être observé. Les questions pouvant être traitées par l’archéologie des habitations-plantations sont extrêmement riches et multiples et ne sauraient être épuisées par la publication d’un unique ouvrage. Les différents chapitres qui composent ce livre dirigé par K. Kelly et B. Bérard n’ont pas vocation à tendre à l’exhaustivité. Ils nous semblent, par contre, être représentatifs, par la variété des questions abordée et la diversité des angles d’approche, de la dynamique actuelle de ce champ de la recherche. Cette diversité est évidemment liée à celle des espaces concernés: les habitations-plantations de cinq îles des Petites Antilles : Antigua, la Guadeloupe, la Dominique, la Martinique et la Barbade sont ici étudiées. Elle est aussi, au sein d’un même espace, due à la cohabitation de différentes pratiques universitaires. Nous espérons que cet ouvrage, tout en diffusant une information jusqu’à présent trop dispersée, sera le point de départ de nouveaux travaux.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Old Testament
    God, His People & the Messiah: A Survey of Old Testament 18 – DAVID & THE ARK (2 SAMUEL 6:1-23; 1 CHRONICLES 13:1-14; 15:1-16:43) I. David Seeks the Ark (2 Samuel 6:1-5; 1 Chronicles 13:1-8) - David consulted with leaders of Israel to gather the Levites who were spread throughout Israel. - They would then bring the Ark back to nation since no one has inquired of it since the days of Saul. - The leaders of the Israel agreed to do this since it seemed right to them. - So David gathered all Israel from the north to the south to bring the Ark. - They carried the Ark on a new cart and two men drove the cart. - David and all Israel played music before God in a procession with the cart. II. Uzzah & the Ark (2 Samuel 6:6-11; 1 Chronicles 13:9-14) - During the journey, the oxen pulling the cart stumbled and Uzzah touched the ark to steady it. - God’s anger was immediately aroused and he killed Uzzah while he was near the Ark of God. - David became angry because of Uzzah being killed, which then turned to fear. - David questioned if the Ark would ever come to him and it was taken to house of Obed-Edom. - The Ark stayed there three month and God blessed Oded-Edom with his household. III. David’s Second Attempt (2 Samuel 6:12-15; 1 Chronicles 15:1-28) - Seeing that the Lord was blessing Obed-Edom, David decided to make another attempt.
    [Show full text]