DOCSLIB.ORG

Chitravathi Pumped Storage Hydro Electric Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chitravathi Pumped Storage Hydro Electric Project FEASIBILITY REPORT CHITRAVATHI PUMPED STORAGE HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Client New & Renewable Energy Development Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. Rev- R1 Consultant Aarvee Associates & Energy Infratech JV Page 1 – – Feasibility Report of Chitravathi Pumped Storage Project ________________________________________________________________________________________________ DOCUMENT RECORD Project Name Chitravathi Pumped Storage Project Name of Client New & Renewable Energy Development Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. Doc No AAEI/POWER/2376/FSR/01 Doc Title Feasibility Study Report Rev No Date of Issue Description R0 11-03-2021 Feasibility Study Report R1 10-07-2021 Feasibility Study Report Client New & Renewable Energy Development Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. Rev- R1 Consultant Aarvee Associates & Energy Infratech JV Page 2 – – Feasibility Report of Chitravathi Pumped Storage Project ________________________________________________________________________________________________ CHITRAVATHI PUMPED STORAGE HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT VOLUME-I: REPORT VOLUME-II: DRAWINGS Client New & Renewable Energy Development Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. Rev- R1 Consultant Aarvee Associates & Energy Infratech JV Page 3 – – Feasibility Report of Chitravathi Pumped Storage Project ________________________________________________________________________________________________ VOLUME-I: REPORT Client New & Renewable Energy Development Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. Rev- R1 Consultant Aarvee Associates & Energy Infratech JV Page 4 – – Feasibility Report of Chitravathi Pumped Storage Project ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................................... 20 1.1 GENERAL ........................................................................................................................................................................ 20 1.2 TYPE OF THE PROJECT .................................................................................................................................................. 21 1.3 LOCATION OF THE PROJECT AREA ............................................................................................................................... 22 1.4 COMMUNICATION FACILITIES ...................................................................................................................................... 23 1.5 GENERAL CLIMATIC CONDITIONS IN THE PROJECT AREA ........................................................................................ 23 1.6 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TOPOGRAPHY, PHYSIOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY OF THE PROJECT AREA .................. 23 1.7 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT: ........................................................................................................... 24 1.7.1 Earlier proposal............................................................................................................................................... 24 1.7.2 Present proposal ............................................................................................................................................. 24 1.8 NEED FOR THE PROJECT, POSSIBLE OPTIONS AND JUSTIFICATION FOR SELECTED OPTION ............................... 25 1.9 ALTERNATIVE STUDIES CARRIED OUT FOR VARIOUS MAJOR COMPONENTS OF THE PROJECT AND FINAL CHOICE OF THE PROJECT PARAMETERS. .................................................................................................................................. 26 1.10 NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE STATE/REGION ................................................................................................... 27 1.11 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS ..................................................................................................................................... 27 1.12 LAND REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION .......................................................................................... 27 1.13 POPULATION AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT AND OCCUPATION OF THE PEOPLE AFFECTED............................. 28 1.14 ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS. .................................................................................................................................... 28 1.15 INTER STATE / INTER-NATIONAL ASPECTS .......................................................................................................... 28 1.16 DEFENCE ANGLE, IF ANY. ......................................................................................................................................... 29 1.17 HYDROLOGY .............................................................................................................................................................. 29 1.18 INSTALLED CAPACITY .............................................................................................................................................. 29 1.19 POWER EVACUATION ............................................................................................................................................... 30 1.20 CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & SCHEDULE ............................................................................................................ 30 1.21 COST AND BENEFITS OF THE SCHEME .................................................................................................................. 30 1.22 SALIENT FEATURES OF THE SCHEME .................................................................................................................... 30 2 JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT FROM POWER SUPPLY ANGLE .................................................................................. 35 2.1 GENERAL ........................................................................................................................................................................ 35 2.2 JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT FROM POWER SUPPLY-DEMAND CONSIDERATIONS.................................................. 35 2.3 DETAILS OF SCHEME FOR EVACUATING POWER ........................................................................................................ 38 2.4 RESOURCES FOR POWER DEVELOPMENT IN THE STATE .......................................................................................... 39 2.4.1 Coal Resources ................................................................................................................................................. 39 Client New & Renewable Energy Development Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. Rev- R1 Consultant Aarvee Associates & Energy Infratech JV Page 5 – – Feasibility Report of Chitravathi Pumped Storage Project ________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2.4.1 Hydro Resources ............................................................................................................................................. 39 2.4.2 Renewable Resources .................................................................................................................................... 39 2.5 AVAILABLE GENERATING CAPACITY IN THE STATE/REGION FROM DIFFERENT SOURCES .................................. 40 2.5.1 Peak load and energy requirement in future in all India/region/state up to the likely date of project completion ..................................................................................................................................................... 40 2.5.2 Likely addition to generating capacity in future in the all India/region/state indicating power supply position with & without the project under consideration and improvement in the hydro-thermal mix. ......................................................................................................................................................... 43 2.6 NECESSITY OF THE PROPOSED CHITRAVATHI PUMPED STORAGE PROJECT ........................................................ 44 2.7 PUMPED STORAGE BENEFITS AND ANCILLARY SERVICES ...................................................................................... 44 3 BASIN DEVELOPMENT ......................................................................................................................................................... 47 3.1 THE COURSE OF THE RIVER ........................................................................................................................................ 47 3.1.1 Power potential of the river basin and stages of development ..................................................... 47 3.1.2 Whether trans-basin diversion of waters involved ........................................................................... 48 3.1.3 Fitment of the scheme in the overall basin development ............................................................... 50 3.1.4 Fitment of the scheme in the power potential assessment studies carried out by CEA .... 50 3.1.5 Effect of future upstream/downstream developments on the potential of proposed scheme50 3.1.6 Conversion of Storage Scheme to ROR, if any ..................................................................................... 50 4 INTERSTATE/INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS .......................................................................................................................... 52 4.1 THE COURSE OF THE RIVER .......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Projects of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana in Krishna Basin
    PROJECTS OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND TELANGANA IN KRISHNA BASIN Ujjaini FRL: +1630'/ 117.24 TMC Rajiv Bhima LIS Kalwakurthy LIS 20 TMC Priyadarshini Jurala Project 40 TMC Nagarjunasagar Reservoir (Common) FRL : + 1045' / 9.66 TMC AMRP LIS FRL + 590'/ 312.05 TMC MDDL: +510' Palamuru Ranga Reddy LIS - 90 TMC Parallel Canal MDDL: + 1033' 30 TMC Live Storage : 181 TMC Live storage: 6.798 TMC Presently from NSP foreshore River Dindi LIS - 30 TMC Koilsagar Bhakta Ramadasu LIS Munneru LIS SLBC Tunnel/AMRP Scheme Bhima LMC 40 TMC Musi Paleru Munneru 0.00 Km 0.00 Srisailam Reservoir (Common) River FRL: + 885'/ 215.81 TMC 518 Km 518 MDDL (Irr) : +854'/ Live storage : 89.29 TMC 590 Km 590 1295 Km 1295 1212 Km 1212 MDDL (Power):+ 834'/ Live storage: 53.851 TMC Km 1401 1253 Km 1253 1216 Km 1216 1152 Km 710 Km 710 BENGAL RIVER KRISHNA 790 Km BAY OF BAY Mahabaleswar Vaikuntapuram 775Km KC Canal 985 Km 985 Barrage 31.90 TMC RMC 1107 Km Veligonda Project Thumilla LIS Sunkesula Barrage At an altitude Muchumarri HNSS LIS FRL: + 800.52'/ 53.85 TMC TMC 3.07 of : 4,385 ft Naguladinne LIS Gundrevula Reservoir LIS MDDL: +703.08'/ Live Storage: 43.50 TMC Project Rajolibanda Diversion 40 TMC above the sea Almatti Dam Almatti level Scheme RDS Canal Guru-Raghavendhra LIS Pothireddipadu Regulator 57.05'/ + 1615'/ 37.64 TMC 37.64 + 1615'/ 15.90 TMC At an elevation of : 0 ft Hagari River SRMC + 1705'/ 129.72 TMC 129.72 + 1705'/ FRL: FRL: Prakasam Barrage Prakasam Banacacherla Complex Regulator FRL: Narayanapur Dam Narayanapur New LIS in FRL: + 175' /45.5 TMC /45.5 + 175'
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphological Studies of the Sedimentary Cuddapah Basin, Andhra Pradesh, South India
    SSRG International Journal of Geoinformatics and Geological Science (SSRG-IJGGS) – Volume 7 Issue 2 – May – Aug 2020 Geomorphological studies of the Sedimentary Cuddapah Basin, Andhra Pradesh, South India Maheswararao. R1, Srinivasa Gowd. S1*, Harish Vijay. G1, Krupavathi. C1, Pradeep Kumar. B1 Dept. of Geology, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa-516005, Andhra Pradesh, India Abstract: The crescent shaped Cuddapah basin located Annamalai Surface - at an altitude of over 8000’ (2424 mainly in the southern part of Andhra Pradesh and a m), ii. Ootacamund Surface – at 6500’-7500’ (1969- little in the Telangana State is one of the Purana 2272 m) on the west and at 3500’ (1060m) on the east basins. Extensive work was carried out on the as noticed in Tirumala hills, iii. Karnataka Surface - stratigraphy of the basin, but there is very little 2700’-3000’ (Vaidynathan, 1964). 2700-3300 reference (Vaidynathan,1964) on the geomorphology of (Subramanian, 1973) 2400-3000 (Radhakrishna, 1976), the basin. Hence, an attempt is made to present the iv. Hyderabad Surface – at 1600’ – 2000’v. Coastal geomorphology of the unique basin. The Major Surface – well developed east of the basin.vi. Fossil Geomorphic units correspond to geological units. The surface: The unconformity between the sediments of the important Physiographic units of the Cuddapah basin Cuddapah basin and the granitic basement is similar to are Palakonda hill range, Seshachalam hill range, ‘Fossil Surface’. Gandikota hill range, Velikonda hill range, Nagari hills, Pullampet valley and Kundair valley. In the Cuddapah Basin there are two major river systems Key words: Topography, Land forms, Denudational, namely, the Penna river system and the Krishna river Pediment zone, Fluvial.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal 16Th Issue
    Journal of Indian History and Culture JOURNAL OF INDIAN HISTORY AND CULTURE September 2009 Sixteenth Issue C.P. RAMASWAMI AIYAR INSTITUTE OF INDOLOGICAL RESEARCH (affiliated to the University of Madras) The C.P. Ramaswami Aiyar Foundation 1 Eldams Road, Chennai 600 018, INDIA September 2009, Sixteenth Issue 1 Journal of Indian History and Culture Editor : Dr.G.J. Sudhakar Board of Editors Dr. K.V.Raman Dr. Nanditha Krishna Referees Dr. A. Chandrsekharan Dr. V. Balambal Dr. S. Vasanthi Dr. Chitra Madhavan Published by Dr. Nanditha Krishna C.P.Ramaswami Aiyar Institute of Indological Research The C.P. Ramaswami Aiyar Foundation 1 Eldams Road Chennai 600 018 Tel : 2434 1778 / 2435 9366 Fax : 91-44-24351022 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.cprfoundation.org ISSN : 0975 - 7805 Layout Design : R. Sathyanarayanan & P. Dhanalakshmi Sub editing by : Mr. Narayan Onkar Subscription Rs. 150/- (for 2 issues) Rs. 290/- (for 4 issues) 2 September 2009, Sixteenth Issue Journal of Indian History and Culture CONTENTS Prehistoric and Proto historic Strata of the Lower Tungabhadra Region of Andhra Pradesh and Adjoining Areas by Dr. P.C. Venkatasubbiah 07 River Narmada and Valmiki Ramayana by Sukanya Agashe 44 Narasimha in Pallava Art by G. Balaji 52 Trade between Early Historic Tamilnadu and China by Dr. Vikas Kumar Verma 62 Some Unique Anthropomorphic Images Found in the Temples of South India - A Study by R. Ezhilraman 85 Keelakarai Commercial Contacts by Dr. A.H. Mohideen Badshah 101 Neo trends of the Jaina Votaries during the Gangas of Talakad - with a special reference to Military General Chamundararaya by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Development of Mega Industrial Park in an Area of 6415.10 Acres
    FORM- I For PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF MEGA INDUSTRIAL PARK IN AN AREA OF 6415.10 ACRES AT VILLAGES: KOPPARTHY, TADIGOTLA, YADAVAPURAM, THOLLAGANGANAPALLI, AMBAVARAM & RAMPATHADU DISTRICT: YSR KADAPA STATE: ANDHRA PRADESH BY ANDHRA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LTD. IT Park, APIIC Towers, Mangalagiri, Guntur District-522503, Andhra Pradesh August, 2019 Form- I I. Basic Information S. Item Details N 1. Name of the Project Proposed MegaIndustrial Park-Kopparthy 2. S. No. in the schedule 7 (C) Proposed capacity/ area/ length/ 6415.10Acres (2596.10 Ha) tonnage to be handled/ command 3. area / lease area /number of wells to be drilled. 4. New/Expansion/Modernization New 5. Existing Capacity/Area etc. Not Applicable 6. Category of Project i.e., ‘A’ or ‘B’ “A” Does it attract general condition? If 7. No yes, please specify. Does it attract specific condition? If Industrial Park with area greater than 500 Ha 8. Yes, please specify. and housing at least one Category B industry. The Project is proposed at Villages : Kopparthy, Tadigotla, Yadavapuram, Thollaganganapalli, Ambavaram & Rampathadu, YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh. The site is about 2596.10 Ha (6415.10 Acres) and falls in 57 Location J/10,11,14 & 15 of SOI Topo sheet and spatial location of the site is 12048’3.22“ N, 9. 79039’35.22” E (Centre Coordinates). The location map of proposed MIP-Kopparthy is given in Annexure-1. MIP master plan is given as Annexure-2. Kopparthy Village - S.Nos. 1-119, 433- 442, 448 - 459,637- 640, 658, Plot/Survey/Khasra No. 660, 667- 675, 687, 688- 761, 766, 768, 770- 773, 775, 776, 779, 780, 781, 783, 785-791, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation and Agriculture Transformation Project (APIIATP) Public Disclosure Authorized Environment and Social Management
    Public Disclosure Authorized Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation and Agriculture Transformation Project (APIIATP) Public Disclosure Authorized Environment and Social Management Framework – Volume 1 March 2018 Public Disclosure Authorized State Project Director APIIATP Water Resources Department Vijayawada 520003 Public Disclosure Authorized Andhra Pradesh APIIATP: Environment and Social Management Framework Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation and Agriculture Transformation Project (APIIATP) Environment and Social Management Framework – Volume 1 March 2018 Sutra Consulting Pvt. Ltd. ii | P a g e APIIATP: Environment and Social Management Framework ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Sutra Consulting is thankful to the Water Resource Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh for providing us the opportunity to undertake this important assignment. I convey my sincere gratitude to Dr. P.S. Raghavaiah, IFS, Special Commissioner, CADA for his guidance and support to the project team. I wish to thank Smt. Y.V. Rajarajeswari, Superintending Engineer for her immense support and cooperation. The Joint Director, Agriculture, Executive Engineer, Dy. Executive Engineer, Asst. Executive Engineers, Asst. Director of Agriculture, Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation and Dy. Executive Engineer, MI, CADA have provided unfailing support and I thank them for the same. I would also convey my sincere thanks to all the PMU Experts for supporting the project team at various stages of the assignment. I wish to thank the World Bank Mission members comprising of Messrs./Mmes. Ranjan
    [Show full text]
  • Multiplicity of Phytoplankton Diversity in Tungabhadra River Near Harihar, Karnataka (India)
    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(2): 1077-1085 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 4 Number 2 (2015) pp. 1077-1085 http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article Multiplicity of phytoplankton diversity in Tungabhadra River near Harihar, Karnataka (India) B. Suresh* Civil Engineering/Environmental Science and Technology Study Centre, Bapuji Institute of Engineering and Technology, Davangere-577 004, Karnataka, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Water is one of the most important precious natural resources required essentially for the survival and health of living organisms. Tungabhadra River is an important tributary of Krishna. It has a drainage area of 71,417 sq km out of which 57,671 sq. km area lies in the state of Karnataka. The study was conducted to measure its various physico-chemical and bacteriological parameters including levels of algal K eywo rd s community. Pollution in water bodies may indicate the environment of algal nutrients in water. They may also function as indicators of pollution. The present Phytoplankton, investigation is an attempt to know the pollution load through algal indicators in multiplicity, Tungabhadra river of Karnataka near Harihar town. The study has been conducted Tungabhadra from May 2008 to April 2009. The tolerant genera and species of four groups of river. algae namely, Chlorophyceae, Bacilleriophyceae, Cyanaophyceae and Euglenophyceae indicate that total algal population is 17,715 in station No. S3, which has the influence of industrial pollution by Harihar Polyfibre and Grasim industry situated on the bank of the river which are discharging its treated effluent to this river.
    [Show full text]
  • Krishna Basin
    CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION Krishna & Godavari Basin Organisation, Hyderabad Daily Bulletin for Flood Forecasting Stations Division : Lower Krishna Division Bulletin No : 21 Krishna Basin : . Dated : 6/21/2019 8:00 Inflow Forecast Stations : S.No Forecast Station Full Reservoir Level Live Capacity at FRL Level at 0800 Hours Live Storage on date % of Live Average Inflow Average Outflow Storage of last 24 hours of last 24 hours Vol. Diff. in Daily Rainfall & Estimated Discharge of all Base Stations at 08.30 Hours in Krishna Basin last 24 hrs (TMC) Estimated Metre Feet MCM TMC Metre Feet Trend MCM TMC Cumec Cusec Cumec Cusec Sl.No. Station River RF in mm Water Level (m) Discharge 1 Almatti Dam 519.60 1704.72 3137.18 110.78 508.02 1666.73 S 262.22 9.26 8 0 0 12 440 -0.04 (Cumec) 2 Narayanpur Dam 492.25 1614.99 740.35 26.14 487.18 1598.36 S 220.85 7.80 30 0 0 2 86 -0.02 1 Kurundwad Krishna 0.0 522.515 No Flow 3 P D Jurala Project 318.52 1045.01 192.40 6.79 313.04 1027.03 S -59.33 -2.09 -31 3 123 3 123 0.00 2 Sadalga Dudhganga 0.0 528.150 No Flow 4 Tungabhadra Dam 497.74 1633.01 2855.89 100.84 479.79 1574.10 F 59.42 2.10 2 0 0 5 185 -0.02 3 Gokak Ghataprabha 0.0 539.424 No Flow 5 Sunkesula Barrage 292.00 958.00 33.98 1.20 285.19 935.66 F 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 4 Almatti Dam Krishna 0.0 508.020 - 6 Srisailam Dam 269.75 885.01 6110.90 215.78 245.76 806.30 S 814.99 28.78 13 2 81 2 81 0.00 5 Cholachguda Malaprabha 0.0 524.800 No Flow 7 Pulichintala Proj.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Water Quality Changes in Krishna River of Andhrap Radesh Through Geoinformatics
    International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-7, Issue-6C2, April 2019 Assessment of Water Quality Changes in Krishna River of Andhrap radesh Through Geoinformatics Lakshman Kumar.C.H, D. Satish Chandra, S.S.Asadi Abstract--- Pancha Boothas are Life and Death for the are permissible in river water but exceed their level its Environment. In that any one is Disrupted that can be Escort to causes several diseases for users and Toxic elements, excess the danger of environment. Water is the one of the Pancha nutrients create vadose zones in river courses [5]. Most of Boothas. Quality of the water is very crucial in the present and the assured irrigation in India is surface water of rivers. It is future users. Natural issues and manmade activities are depending on the water quality. The ratio of transportation of essential to monitor and assess the water quality in the fresh water in liquid form to covert useless form is 70%. The Krishna river course. ratio of sedimentation is also one of the parameter of the water quality, if changes are happen in sedimentation the quality of the Notations: water also changes. The causes of water pollution source are GDSQ: Gauge Discharge Sediment and Water Quality many, of which sewage discharge, industrial effluents, agricultural effluents and several man made activities are play a GDQ : Gauge Discharge Water Quality key role on water quality. The total percentage of water in the pH : Potential of Hydrogen world is 97% in Oceans and reaming 3% of water in form of EC : Electric Conductivity glaciers, in which the consumption of water quantity is in form of CO3 : Carbonate surface and subsurface water bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Evaluating the Benefits and Costs of Developmental Interventions in the Water Sector in Andhra Pradesh
    WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Evaluating the Benefits and Costs of Developmental Interventions in the Water Sector in Andhra Pradesh Cost-Benefit Analysis Dr. Dinesh AUTHORS: Kumar Executive Director Institute for Resource Analysis and Policy (IRAP), Hyderabad © 2018 Copenhagen Consensus Center [email protected] www.copenhagenconsensus.com This work has been produced as a part of the Andhra Pradesh Priorities project under the larger, India Consensus project. This project is undertaken in partnership with Tata Trusts. Some rights reserved This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution Please cite the work as follows: #AUTHOR NAME#, #PAPER TITLE#, Andhra Pradesh Priorities, Copenhagen Consensus Center, 2017. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0. Third-party-content Copenhagen Consensus Center does not necessarily own each component of the content contained within the work. If you wish to re-use a component of the work, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that re-use and to obtain permission from the copyright owner. Examples of components can include, but are not limited to, tables, figures, or images. Evaluating the Benefits and Costs of Developmental Interventions in the Water Sector Andhra Pradesh Priorities An India Consensus Prioritization
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Sensing and GIS in the Morphometric Analysis Of
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 03 Issue: 02 | Feb-2016 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Remote sensing and GIS in the morphometric analysis of macro- watersheds for hydrological Scenario assessment and characterization - A study on Penna river sub-basin, SPSR Nellore district, India. N.Harish1, P. Siva Kumar2, M. Siva Raja3 , V. Lokesh4, M.V. Gopi Santosh Reddy5, Sk. Shalisad6, S. Sazid7 1Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, NBKRIST, Nellore, India-524413 2,3,4,5,6,7 UG-students, NBKRIST, Nellore, India-524413 ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract – Hydrological assessment and characterization of methods to quantify the land exteriors (Singh, 1992; and Dar the macro-watersheds of Pennar river sub-basin is et al. 2013). Consequently, the process is responsible for a done through the analysis and evaluation of various drainage holistic understanding of hydrologic behavior of a and topographic parameters. The morphometric approach watershed. Similarly, some of the morphometric parameters, involving the analysis of Digital elevation model has largely like, circularity ratio and bifurcation ratio are input helped in the logical assessment of hydrological character of parameters in the hydrological analysis (Jain, 2000 and the basin. The analysis of various linear and areal aspects has Esper, 2008) and evaluation of surface water potentiality of revealed that the topographical configuration and an area (Suresh, 2004). A more realistic approach of geomorphic setting of the basin has assumed a dendritic drainage morphometric analysis is employed by using the drainage pattern with 5th order drainage. Consequently, the drainage network extracted from the Digital Elevation Model study helped in the identification and mapping the potentiality (DEM) as suggested by Callaghan, 1984 and Bhat, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 GEOMORPHOLOGY the Quartz Mining Site of SLV Mines and Minerals Is Located Near D.Cherlopalli Village of Batahlapalli Mandal in Anantapur District of Andhra Pradesh
    ANNEXURE - IV REPORT ON THE HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE SLV MINES & MINERALS AT D.CHERLOPALLI (V), BATHALAPALLI (M), ANANTAPUR DISRTRICT, A.P. 1 GEOMORPHOLOGY The quartz mining site of SLV Mines and Minerals is located near D.Cherlopalli village of Batahlapalli mandal in Anantapur district of Andhra Pradesh. The mining site is located 4.50 km southwest of D.Cherlopalli village, 14.30 km east of Dharmavaram, and 40 km southeast of Anantapur (Figures 1 to 3). The area is as well shown in the Toposheet No. 57F/15 of the Survey of India, and is bounded within the latitudes of 14° 24'56.50" to 14° 25'10.70” and longitudes of 77° 50'30.40" to 77° 50'55.00". Figure 1. Regional Map of Project Area The area is regionally underlain by weathered and massive granite gneisses, and is distinguished by hilly topography, with gentle slope towards the Chitravathi River (Figure 1). The general elevation around the mining site area is around 364 m above mean sea level (amsl), with medium range hills of 500 - 625 m amsl occurring towards south. The area around the project site constitute dissected, undulating and rolling topography with erosional landscape covered by a layer of red loamy granitic soil of varied thickness. The undulating terrain is punctuated by granite hillocks, inselbergs, mounds, tors, dykes, etc. The main mining area is located on a medium NWW-SEE ranging linear hill with an elevation of 360 to 490 m amsl with a radial slope. The low lying area around the hill is intervened by and drained by minor ephemeral streams and streamlets.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Sector Government of Andhra Pradesh
    Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on Economic Sector for the year ended March 2017 Government of Andhra Pradesh Report No. 4 of 2018 www.cag.gov.in Table of contents Reference to Subject Paragraph Page Preface v Chapter - I Overview of Economic Sector Introduction 1.1 1 Authority for Audit 1.2 1 About this Report 1.3 2 Planning and Conduct of Audit 1.4 2 Response of Government Departments 1.5 3 - 4 Expenditure by Departments in Economic Sector 1.6 4 - 5 Grants Significant Audit Findings 1.7 5 - 12 Chapter - II Performance Audit Water Resources Department Polavaram Irrigation Project 2.1 13 - 43 Information Technology, Electronics and Communications Department Development of Information Technology and 2.2 44 - 58 Communication Infrastructure by the Information, Technology, Electronics and Communications Department Chapter - III Compliance Audit Environment, Forests, Science and Technology Department Implementation of Biological Diversity Act, 2002 3.1 59 - 65 by Andhra Pradesh State Biodiversity Board Industries and Commerce Department Implementation of Andhra Pradesh Single Desk 3.2 66 - 71 Policy 2015 in Industries & Commerce Department Water Resources Department Implementation of Irrigation schemes under Accelerated Irrigation Benefits Programme 3.3 72 - 81 Extra expenditure on works 3.4 81 - 83 Page i Avoidable expenditure of ₹ 14.33 crore due to late payment of High Tension Current 3.5 83 - 85 Consumption charges Incomplete execution of flood protection work 3.6 85 - 87 Appendices 89 - 95 Glossary 97 - 99 Page
    [Show full text]