Electronic Permitting Systems and How to Implement Them

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Electronic Permitting Systems and How to Implement Them U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ELECTRONIC PERMITTING SYSTEMS AND HIOW TO MPLEMENT THEM MENT OF RT H A O P U E S D I . N S G . U ★ ★ A N T D N E U M R P B O AN L D EV E Office of Policy Development and Research U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ELECTRONIC PERMITTING SYSTEMS AND HOW TO IMPLEMENT THEM PREPARED FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH by the National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C. under Contract C-OPC-21204 April 2002 i ELECTRONIC PERMITTING SYSTEMS AND HIOW TO MPLEMENT THEM ATH (Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing) is a private/public effort to develop, Pdemonstrate, and gain widespread market acceptance for the "Next Generation" of American housing. Through the use of new or innovative technologies, the goal of PATH is to improve the quality, durability, environmental efficiency, and affordability of tomorrow's homes. PATH is managed and supported by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In addition, all federal agencies that engage in housing research and technology development are PATH Partners, including the Departments of Energy, Commerce, and Agriculture as well as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). State and local govern ments and other participants from the public sector are also partners in PATH. Product manufacturers, home builders, insurance companies, and lenders represent private industry in the PATH Partnership. To learn more, please contact PATH, 451 7th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20410; phone 202-708-4277; fax 202-708-5873; e-mail [email protected]; website www.pathnet.org. Visit PD&R's website, www.huduser.org, to find this publication and others sponsored by HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R). Other services of HUD USER, PD&R's Research Information Service, include listservs; special interest, bimonthly publications (best practices, significant studies from other sources); access to public use databases; and a hotline 1-800-245-2691 for help accessing the information you need. The statements and conclusions contained in this publication are those of the National Institute of Building Sciences and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Institute has made every effort to verify the accuracy and appropriateness of the publication’s content. However, no guarantee of the accuracy or completeness of the information or acceptability for compliance with any industry standard or mandatory requirement of any code, law, or regulation is either offered or implied. Cover photo: Photodisc.com ii U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FOREWORD lectronic construction permitting is changing the way communities across the nation do business, Espeeding the building permit process for the people most involved—builders, inspectors, and plan reviewers—and providing better and more timely information to decision makers, managers, and staff throughout city hall. Initiated by a few pioneering jurisdictions in the early 1980s, electronic permitting is becoming mainstream. Private vendors offer a variety of excellent permitting software and systems that can be tailored to a jurisdic- tion’s needs. Many can be integrated into larger, government-wide electronic management systems. Regardless of the software or system used, progressive local governments everywhere are adopting electronic permitting. This publication is designed to help America’s communities understand the process of selecting and implementing an electronic permitting system. Benefiting from the experiences of others, communities can implement electronic permitting systems with better results and at lower cost. Through its Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing (PATH) program, HUD is pleased to pro vide this publication on electronic permitting systems. Lawrence L. Thompson General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research iii ELECTRONIC PERMITTING SYSTEMS AND HIOW TO MPLEMENT THEM iv U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENTS his publication is based on a survey of electronic permitting systems currently used in building depart Tments nationwide. Over 100 jurisdictions known to be leaders in electronic permitting were contacted; 51 completed detailed surveys and were interviewed in depth. The jurisdictions included counties, cities, and towns in rural, urban, and suburban areas with populations ranging from 11 thousand to 9.8 million. The building departments, or their counterparts, of all 50 states were also contacted and 32 were interviewed in depth. A sincere thanks is extended to those who gave their time and shared their wealth of knowledge and experience. Steven Spector conducted the surveys and interviews and prepared the findings herein. Building Technology Inc. provided technical support. Migs Grove was the publication editor and Marcia Axtmann Smith the publication designer. William Brenner directed the project for the National Institute of Building Sciences. Dana Bres served as the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s program manager. v ELECTRONIC PERMITTING SYSTEMS AND HIOW TO MPLEMENT THEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PATH . .ii IMPLEMENTING ELECTRONIC PERMITTING . .9 IN YOUR JURISDICTION Foreword . .iii Determine the Need . .9 Acknowledgments . .v Create an Electronic Permitting Taskforce . .10 Check with Other Building Departments . .10 Identify Possible Vendors . .11 ABOUT ELECTRONIC PERMITTING . .1 Justify the Cost . .11 What is Electronic Permitting? . .1 Select the Type of System: Departmental or What is the Future of Electronic Permitting? . .1 Multiagency, a la Carte or Integrated? . .11 Prepare a Request for Proposals . .11 Why Others Have Adopted Electronic Permitting . .1 Disseminate the RFP . .14 Evaluate Bidders and Select Vendors . .14 Types of Electronic Permitting Systems . .2 Establish an Implementation Team . .14 Homegrown Systems . .2 Put the System in Place and “Go Live” . .15 Component Systems . .2 Integrated Systems . .2 ELECTRONIC PERMITTING CASE STUDIES . .16 System Components and Capabilities . .2 Case Study #1: Small Jurisdictions . .16 Permitting Software . .2 La Crosse, Wisconsin . .16 Plan Review Software . .5 Los Alamos, New Mexico . .17 Inspection Software . .6 Corning, New York . .17 Transaction Software . .6 Case Study #2: Medium-sized Reporting Software . .6 Jurisdictions . .18 Project Management and Tracking Software Carrollton, Texas . .18 Communication Tools . .6 Overland Park, Kansas . .18 Geographic Information Systems . .7 Hamilton County, Ohio . .19 System Support and Management . .7 Case Study #3: Large Jurisdictions . .20 In-house Information Technology Staff . .7 State of Indiana . .20 Service Contracts . .8 Kansas City, Missouri . .20 Application Service Providers . .8 Case Study #4: Silicon Valley Network and Members . .21 Silicon Valley Network, California . .21 Sunnyvale, California . .21 San Jose, California . .22 vi U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT APPENDICES . .23 LIST OF TABLES Appendix A: . .23 Table 1: . .3 Los Angeles County, California, Electronic Seventeen Home-Grown Electronic Permitting Statement of Goals Permitting Leaders Appendix B: . .24 Table 2: . .4 Burlington, Vermont, Electronic Permitting Twenty-four Electronic Permitting Vocabulary Component System Leaders Appendix C: . .26 Table 3: . .5 Mecklenburg, North Carolina, Building Seventeen Electronic Permitting Trade Permit Process—Current and Future Integrated System Leaders Appendix D: . .33 Table 4: . .7 Burlington, Vermont, Electronic Permitting Permitting Functions and Software Functional and Technical Requirements Table 5: . .12 Appendix E: . .34 Vendor Profiles San Jose, California, Electronic Permitting Functional and Technical Requirements Appendix F: . .41 San Jose, California, Electronic Permitting Functional and Technical Requirements Appendix G: . .43 Vendor List Appendix H: . .44 State and Local Contacts vii ELECTRONIC PERMITTING SYSTEMS AND HIOW TO MPLEMENT THEM viii OVERVIEW ABOUT ELECTRONIC PERMITTING any building departments across America are consists of only one or two of the tools mentioned Mconfronted with overextended staffs, increased above. demand for permitting services, and pressure to improve customer service. Computer and informa­ The most sophisticated state-of-the-art system is tion technologies play a key role in helping to called an enterprise system and serves many depart­ address the personnel and budget constraints these ments within a local government, coordinating and departments typically face. linking a broad range of activities such as building safety, planning, development, geographic informa­ tion system (GIS) services, finance, public utilities, What Is Electronic Permitting? fire safety, and public health. Electronic permitting is a set of computer-based tools and services that automate and streamline the build­ What Is the Future of Electronic Permitting? ing permit process. The intent of electronic permitting is to reduce permitting time, improve customer Electronic permitting has evolved since the early service and staff efficiency, enhance quality, and make 1980s, when innovative building departments had to operating funds more productive. An electronic per­ create their own software on mainframe computers. mitting system typically replaces traditional paper- Today, software vendors provide building depart­ and file-card systems.
Recommended publications
  • ANALYST QUICK NOTES New Products, M&A
    ANALYST QUICK NOTES New products, M&A announcements, management shakeups, earnings surprises. Whatever the news, you want to know what Argus thinks. Our Quick Notes fill this need by providing real-time analysis of current news about Argus-covered companies or other market-moving events. Please check back regularly for new Quick Notes. Important disclaimer information is on the last page of this document. The Blackstone Group (NYSE: BX: BUY) Target Price: $47 Stephen Biggar 5/13/2015 Investment Thesis Favorable events in the past week: o On May 11, BX announced sale of an additional 103.5 million shares in Hilton Worldwide (HLT), which will bring in $3.1 billion: . BX took HLT public in December 2013. Shares up 31% in the past year. Stake will be reduced from 55% to 45%, sparking the notion of potential HLT inclusion in S&P 500. o On May 5, BX sold balance of stake in Pinnacle Foods: . Last filing showed 19.2 million shares valued at $790 million. o On May 5, news reports indicated SunGard Data Systems was readying an IPO: . BX, GS, KKR, Bain and others took SunGard private in 2005 Events show Private Equity segment still has a solid monetization pipeline, to result in strong cash distributions. Signed agreement in April to purchase GE Capital Real Estate - to close in second and third quarters. Upcoming spin-off of financial advisory business will reduce in-house conflicts, including distressed debt investing, and allow additional investments. o BX will hold 65% of spun-off entity. 1Q15 capital raised was a record $30.4 billion: o Dry powder was $64.5 billion at March 31.
    [Show full text]
  • Burlington PD Media Log Page: 1 Selective Search From: 01/01/2017 Thru: 01/31/2017 0000 - 2359 Printed: 06/08/2017
    Burlington PD Media log Page: 1 Selective Search From: 01/01/2017 Thru: 01/31/2017 0000 - 2359 Printed: 06/08/2017 For Date: 01/01/2017 - Sunday Call Number Time Call Reason Action 17-2 0100 Initiated - Disabled MV Logged Call Taker: LML131 - Patrol Lindsay M LaPrad Primary Id: MPM103 - Patrol Michael P Minichiello Location/Address: 80 MALL RD @ 100 DISTRICT AVE ID: MPM103 - Patrol Michael P Minichiello Vehicle: BRO 1999 NISS SE ALTIMA GXEGLE Reg: PC MA 2EW877 VIN: 1N4DL01D4XC177689 Narrative: #103 reports a DMV with a flat tire. Narrative: Party changed his tire and is on his way. 17-3 0108 911 - Ambulance Request Logged Call Taker: LML131 - Patrol Lindsay M LaPrad Primary Id: AMD127 - Patrol Ashley M Daniels Location/Address: 111 LEXINGTON ST ID: AMD127 - Patrol Ashley M Daniels Narrative: RP fell trying to get back into bed. BFD notified. Narrative: Fire department assisted with a lift assist. 17-10 0420 Phone - ALARM False Alarm Call Taker: LML131 - Patrol Lindsay M LaPrad Primary Id: MPM103 - Patrol Michael P Minichiello Location/Address: [BUR 260] CHILI'S GRILL & BAR #9 - 108 MIDDLESEX TPKE ID: MPM103 - Patrol Michael P Minichiello Narrative: Stanley Security reports an alarm, multiple zones; front door, kitchen door and kitchen motion. Narrative: Accidental by cleaner. 17-11 0542 Phone - ALARM False Alarm Call Taker: LML131 - Patrol Lindsay M LaPrad Primary Id: BTH129 - Patrol Brian T Hanafin, B Location/Address: [BUR 1763] WENDY'S - 112 MALL RD ID: BTH129 - Patrol Brian T Hanafin, B Narrative: Tycois reports alarm, multiple zones; motion detector, rear door, and rear motion.
    [Show full text]
  • KPMG's Executive Leadership Institute for Women
    KPMG’s Executive Leadership Institute for Women A leadership development series created by KPMG’s Network of Women (KNOW) and The Leader’s Edge/Leaders By Design In these economic times, the need for effective leadership has never been more important. KPMG’s Executive Leadership Institute for Women is designed to equip participants with a deep understanding of the principles and practical skills that aim to allow them to achieve leadership excellence. KPMG’s Executive Leadership Institute for Women — Created by KNOW in collaboration with The Leader’s — The opportunity to enhance individual awareness Edge/Leaders By Design and development through the use of reliable and valid assessment tools — A locally based program for highly talented executive women who currently hold significant leadership — A limited enrollment that helps ensure effective and positions individualized attention — Practical instruction in leadership development that — Timely, convenient, and cost effective delivers immediate impact and workplace application — CPE credits provided — A certificate-based curriculum developed and taught by experienced executives, who are also trained psychologists, researchers, and PhDs—each with more than 25 years of experience in executive coaching, leadership development, and career counseling — A program of four half-day leadership sessions conducted over the course of a year, reinforced with monthly virtual meetings that provide personalized instruction and support from trained facilitators — An opportunity for networking with a diverse group of senior women executives who represent a cadre of prestigious global companies — Distinct design that provides continuity, instruction, and networking for practical application to your individual work environment © 2017 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngai V. Urban Outfitters, Inc., No. 19-Cv-1480
    Case 2:19-cv-01480-WB Document 50 Filed 03/29/21 Page 1 of 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PAUL NGAI AND XIAOYAN NGAI, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC., LORIE A. NO. 19-1480 KERNECKEL, BARBARA ROZASAS, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 AND ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendants Urban Outfitters, Inc. (“Urban”), Lorie A. Kerneckel, and Barbara Rozsas (collectively, Defendants) move for summary judgment on Paul Ngai (“Plaintiff” or “Ngai”) and Xiaoyan Ngai’s (together, “Plaintiffs”) claims for national origin and age discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Pennsylvania Human Rights Act (PHRA), and the Philadelphia Fair Practices Ordinance (PFPO), aiding and abetting discrimination in violation of the PHRA and PFPO, whistleblower retaliation in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, violation of the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law (WPCL), and common law intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) and loss of consortium.1 In turn, Plaintiffs move for partial summary judgment with respect to Defendants’ affirmative defense that Ngai failed to mitigate damages. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part and Plaintiffs’ motion will be denied. 1 Plaintiff abandons his gender-based claims of discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment, common law wrongful discharge, and whistleblower retaliation under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in his summary judgment briefing. These claims will therefore be dismissed.
    [Show full text]
  • Unisys Revised Response To
    Unisys Revised Response to Constituent Relationship Management (CRM) Solution and Build Out of a 311 Call Center Request for Proposal #12‐008 Volume 1 – Technical Proposal June 15, 2012 This proposal has been reproduced on recycled paper Unisys UNISYS REVISED RESPONSE TO THE CITY OF ELGIN CONSTITUENT RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM) AND BUILD OUT OF A 311 CALL CENTER REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL #12‐008 Table of Contents 1.0 Transmittal Letter ................................................................................................................... 1‐1 2.0 Vendor Information ................................................................................................................ 2‐1 3.0 Financial Statements .............................................................................................................. 3‐1 4.0 Client References .................................................................................................................... 4‐1 5.0 Scope of Services .................................................................................................................... 5‐7 5.1 The 3‐1‐1 Phone Number and the Call Intake Function ................................................ 5‐19 5.2 Project Management ..................................................................................................... 5‐19 5.3 Vendor Project Manager Responsibilities ...................................................................... 5‐26 5.4 Software Licenses .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Richard A. Fenyes Partner
    Richard A. Fenyes Partner 425 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 [email protected] Phone: +1-212-455-2812 Fax: +1-212-455-2502 Richard Fenyes is a Partner who has advised clients for more PRACTICE FOCUS than twenty years on equity and debt capital markets transactions as well as general corporate and securities law Capital Markets matters. He regularly advises the Firm’s clients, including Initial Public Offerings private equity sponsors such as KKR, Blackstone and Goldman High Yield Sachs Capital Partners, and their portfolio companies, in Debt connection with IPOs, acquisition financing, refinancings, debt Corporate Private Capital and Special Situations restructuring and other registered and private offerings of equity Environmental, Social and Governance and debt securities. (ESG) and Sustainability Richard’s representation of clients in equity offerings includes Leveraged Finance advising on the: Private Equity Lifecycle IPO of Bentley Systems, Inc. INDUSTRIES IPO of ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. Technology IPO of Shift4 Payments, Inc. Healthcare IPO and secondary offerings of Gardner Denver Holdings, FinTech Inc. IPO and secondary offerings of First Data Corporation IPO and secondary offerings of TransUnion IPO and secondary offerings of PRA Health Sciences, Inc. IPO and secondary offerings of Pinnacle Foods Inc. IPO of Graham Packaging Company, Inc. IPO of Education Management Corporation IPO and secondary offerings of Nalco Holding Company secondary offerings of common stock of Gartner, Inc. www.simpsonthacher.com 1 IPO of Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. IPO Peabody Energy Corporation Richard has represented issuers in high yield offerings and bridge financings in connection with acquisitions and refinancings, including many of the largest LBOs ever completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Women on Boards the Forum of Executive Women Executive Suites Initiative
    Women on Boards The Forum of Executive Women Executive Suites Initiative Improving corporate governance. Increasing shareholder value. The time is NOW. Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania is proud to support The Forum of Executive Women in a variety of ways, including underwriting The Forum's Women on Boards report for 2004. At Citizens Bank, where women comprise 50 percent of our Leadership Team, we believe that diversity, in all of its many manifestations, results in different perspectives, new ideas, and stronger outcomes. In embracing its mission to support colleagues, customers, and community, Citizens Bank applauds The Forum for its leadership in advocating for the advancement of women in our region. About The Forum of Executive Women Founded in 1977, The Forum of Executive Women is a membership organization of 300 women of influence in Greater Philadelphia. Its members hold top positions in every major segment of the community — from finance to manufacturing, from government to healthcare, from not-for-profits to communications, from the professions to technology. As the region's premier women's organization, The Forum fulfills its mission — to advance women leaders in Greater Philadelphia — by supporting women in leadership roles, promoting parity in the corporate world, mentoring young women, and providing a forum for the exchange of views, contacts, and information. The Forum's Executive Suites Initiative advocates and facilitates the increased representation of women on boards and in top management positions of major public companies in our region. Irene H. Hannan, President Sharon Hardy, Executive Director A Four-Year Snapshot of Women On Boards % of women on boards 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% Executive 2% Summary 0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 Ensuring the Research is Current and Comparable Companies in the technology/telecommunications category have the fewest women represented in all levels of Revenues change from year to year.
    [Show full text]
  • Insurer's Choice
    Financial Insights INSURER’S TechCHOICE Decisions Technology Ranking 2009 © Bob Commander/Stock Illustration Source/Getty Images Source/Getty Illustration © Bob Commander/Stock A supplement to Tech Decisions and the National Underwriter Techdecisions Summit Business Media publications The Policy System You’ve Been Waiting For From the company that brought you ClaimCenter – the market-leading claims system The wait is over. The days of P&C carriers being Guidewire PolicyCenter® is a web-based underwrit- limited by aging policy administration systems are ing and policy management system for personal and gone. Now you can take control of your sales and commercial lines carriers. PolicyCenter helps your service processes in a single system that provides organization grow business profitably by increasing flexibility, operational efficiency, and ease of use by efficiency and lowering expenses, while responding harnessing the power of modern technology. flexibly to market opportunities and improving relationships with customers and agents. Leverage rules and workflow automation to improve underwriting discipline and efficiency, increase ease To learn how PolicyCenter can transform your of doing business with an intuitive web presence for underwriting and policy management operations, your agents, and freely configure products and visit www.guidewire.com/pc2. processes for the way you want to go to market. www.guidewire.com © 2009 Guidewire Software, Inc. All rights reserved. Guidewire, Guidewire Software, Guidewire ClaimCenter, Guidewire PolicyCenter, Guidewire BillingCenter, Guidewire Insurance Suite, and the Guidewire logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Guidewire Software, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries. Financial Insights Interesting Times INSURER’S By Barry Rabkin TechCHOICE Decisions Technology Ranking hether ancient curse or folklore, the expression May you 2009 live in interesting times certainly has taken on a bit more W meaning than any of us would like.
    [Show full text]
  • Unisys 2001 Annual Report
    Services and Technology: Helping You Create Business Value. Unisys Unisys Corporation 2001 Annual Report Unisys Unisys is a worldwide information technology ser- vices and solutions company whose 39,000 people Contents help clients in more than 100 countries utilize tech- Letter to Stakeholders 1 nology to seize opportunities, overcome challenges Chairman, President and CEO Larry Weinbach reviews 2001 and succeed in the global economy. and outlines the Unisys strategy for 2002. Chairman’s Q&A 3 Larry Weinbach answers operational questions. Our company offers a rich portfolio of business Our Work: Services and Technology 4 solutions led by our expertise in consulting and What we do. Our Success: Unisys Customers 6 systems integration, outsourcing, network services Who we do it for. and security, coupled with leading enterprise-class Our Strength: Unisys People 11 Who we are. server and related technologies. Primary vertical Our Premise: Educating 12 for Leadership markets for Unisys worldwide are the financial How we innovate. Financial Review 13 services, transportation, communications, media, Corporate Officers 47 commercial and public sectors, including U.S. Board of Directors 48 federal government customers. Investor Information 49 Unisys is headquartered in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, in the Greater Philadelphia area. For more informa- tion on the company, access the Unisys home page on the World Wide Web at www.unisys.com. Investor information can be found at www.unisys.com/investor. About our cover Unisys provides the solution to the puzzle of how organizations can use technology to create business value. Our cover graphically represents what we do and shows how we intertwine our expertise in the service areas of outsourcing, network services and systems integration, as well as in technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Bijlage Overzicht Corporate Governance 4E Kwartaal
    ! ! ! Overzicht Corporate Governance 4e kwartaal 2014 In deze lijst wordt aangegeven van welke landen we staatsobligaties bezitten die direct op naam staan van het Pensioenfonds TNO. Vervolgens worden daarnaast de beleggingsfondsen genoemd waar we op 31-12-2014 in beleggen. Tot slot staat in de PDF een lange lijst van instellingen en bedrijven waarvan de obligaties direct op naam van het Pensioenfonds TNO staan. (Quasi) staatsobligaties Fixed Income Beleggingsfondsen direct op naam van Pensioenfonds TNO (13/12/2014) Duitsland BlackRock Emerging Market debt (hard Frankrijk currency) Nederland Neuberger Berman Emerging Market debt Mexico (local currency) Slovenië Robeco European High Yield fund Roemenië Ijsland Aandelenbeleggingsfondsen (13/12/2014) Italië Vanguard Inst. Index Fund Chili Vanguard SRI European Stock Index Fund Litouwen Vanguard Emerging Markets Equity Fund Spanje BlackRock Japan Equity fund exclusief controversial weapons BlackRock Pacific ex Japan Equity fund exclusief controversial weapons Obligaties direct op naam van AECOM TECHNOLOGY Pensioenfonds TNO AES Corp/VA AAF Holdings LLC Affinion Group Inc ABEST_9 Aguila 3 SA ABN AMRO BANK NV AIA GROUP LTD Access Midstream Partners LP / ACMP Fin AIB MORTGAGE BANK Accuride Corp Air Canada ACE Cash Express Inc AK Steel Corp ACHMEA HYPOTHEEKBANK NV Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc ACOSTA Alere Inc ACTIVISION BLIZZARD Aleris International Inc ADECCO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SER Algeco Scotsman Global Finance Plc ADT CORP ALLEGIANT TRAVEL CO Advanced Micro Devices Inc Allen Systems Group Inc
    [Show full text]
  • Hardman Monthly – March 2016
    8th March 2016 Hardman Monthly – March 2016 Feature article – Pharmaceutical industry This month’s feature article is the first publication of the top 15 drug companies in the 2015 global industry ranking and how this has changed over the last decade. In trying to analyse the changes that have taken place, we have looked at different strategies used by management teams. Many companies are featured, but there is emphasis on GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), AstraZeneca (AZN) and Shire Pharmaceuticals (SHP). In addition, we have analysed how drugs derived from antibodies have driven market growth and now represent just over 10% of annual industry sales. Latest research Date Company/sector Title Team 2 Mar Alliance Pharma Acquisition impact and future growth opportunity MH 24 Feb Allergy Therapeutics (AGY) Development progress MH 23 Feb Avacta (AVCT) Affimers – next generation therapeutic platform MH 2 Feb Redx Pharma (REDX) Pipeline progress – Porcupine inhibitor MH 15 Feb Collagen Solutions (COS) Secure base, and opportunities intact MH 16 Feb City of London Investment Group (CLIG) First half 2016 results BM 2 Feb Par Fund Management Syndicate EIS/Innovation EIS Funds BM 11 Feb Primary Health Properties (PHP) 100% dividend cover target achieved in 2H 2015 MF 3 Feb Retail Bonds Review No.11 BM 2 Feb Advanced Oncotherapy (AVO) Chine – An emerging opportunity MH 2 Feb Real Good Food Company (RGF) Profits downgraded bust still growing FY16E, FY17E MF Source: Hardman & Co Research Forthcoming events Date Event 8 March Allergy Therapeutics (AGY) interim
    [Show full text]
  • Unisys Corporation Unisys Way Blue Bell, PA 19424-0001 March 18
    Unisys Corporation Unisys Way Blue Bell, PA 19424-0001 March 18, 2004 Dear Fellow Stockholder: It is my pleasure to invite you to the Unisys 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This year's meeting will be held on Thursday, April 22, 2004, at The Hilton Inn at Penn, which is located at 3600 Sansom Street in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. Unisys delivered strong results in 2003. We achieved double-digit growth in our earnings and generated substantial cash Öow from operations. We have now steadily grown our earnings and operational cash Öow for three consecutive years in the midst of a highly volatile period for the information technology industry. We are proud of this record of Ñnancial consistency and the focus and execution that Unisys people are showing in the marketplace. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, I urge you to take a moment to vote on the items in this year's proxy statement. Most stockholders have a choice of voting their shares over the Internet, by telephone, or by completing, signing, and returning a proxy card. Voting by any of these means takes only a few minutes, and it will ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting. If you vote over the Internet, you will also be given the opportunity to access future proxy statements and annual reports over the Internet instead of receiving paper copies in the mail. Electronic access saves the company the cost of producing and mailing these documents. I encourage you to take advantage of it.
    [Show full text]