DOCSLIB.ORG

Michael K. Bomford

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Michael K. Bomford POTENTXAL OF PHYSICAL BARRIERS FOR ROOT WEEVIL MANAGEMENT IN NURSERIES Michael K. Bomford B. Sc.(&.), University of British Columbia, 1995 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF PEST MANAGEMENT in the Department of Biological Sciences Michael Bomford SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Apri.19, 1998 AU rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whale or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 ofCanada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Otiawa ON K1 A ON4 Ottawa ON KIA ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sel1 reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in rnicrofonn, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Abstract Aîthough physical exclusion shows some potential as a novel root weevil control strategy, it has received iittle research attention. Several studies were undertaken in 1997 to assess the potentiai of two physical barriers, alumirium fences and extruded plastic trenches, for root weevil management in local nursery crops. In laboratory tests, fluon and powdered talc both reduced the climbing ability of adult root weevils. In field studies, trenches and fences with Teflon added reduced pooled root weevil immigration into plots of strawbemes by up to 67%. Immigration of the two most commody captured weevils, Nemocestes incomptus (Hom) and Barypeithes pellucidus (Boh.),was reduced by up to 84 and 7396, respectively. Concurrent increases in strawberry plant mass and suxvival were observed. Adding diatomaceous earth to trenches did not increase their efficacy, and fences without Teflon were not effective bamiers. Immigration of carabids < 1 and > 1 cm long, respectively, was reduced by up to 84 and 54% by trenches, and 58 and 99% by fences. Adding diatomaceous earth to trenches or Teflon to fences had no effect on carabid immigration. Field trials with pardel trenches revealed up to 100% weevil escape rates, yet trenches proved a more reliable method of monitoring weevils than pitfall traps, catching larger numbers and a wider variety of curculionid species. Smaii-sale field and laboratoxy trials suggested that surfaces which root weevils cannot climb when dry are made climbable by condensation. Fences weathered field conditions well adare made of comxnerciaUy available components, but their practical potential is limited by their height and considerable labor requirements. Trenches have many disadvantages, includùlg a tendency to trap beneficial insects, shallow soii penetration, and a tendency to crack, bend, and twist under UV exposure and temperature variation. However, most of these problems could be overcome through simple design modifications, their low profile makes them compatible with wheeled farm machinery, and they could potentially kiU root weevils, instead of just excluding them. Both barriers wodd be lesexpensive than chernical controls if used to protect large areas for several years. iii Acknowledgements 1 th&: Jeff Hicks, Pickett's Nurseries and John Traas, Traas Rootstock Nursery, for providing field space and advice; Murray Isman for providing laboratory and field space and computer access; Lynne GLli.net for ofFehg her yard as a weevil collection site, and helping to coiiect specimens; John Borden for advice, assistance, and review of this manuscript; Mark Bomford, Sharon Coliman, Natasha Bassagnova, Richard Cowles, Adony Melathopolous, Linda Gilkeson, Hanna Mathers and Dave Raworth for advice and encouragement. Bob Vernon deserves especidy heartfelt thanks for the enthusiasm, encouragement, knowledge, and support he offered throughout the course of this work. He struck a careful balance between being always available for help, yet offering me enough independence to create my own project and make my own mistakes. His confidence in me gave me confidence in myself. Thanks to my partner, Ga Ching Kong, for listening to me say far more about weevils than she ever wanted to know, and still continuhg to offer support and encouragement. 1 would also like to thank my parents, for supporting me throughout my Me-long education, and continuhg to do so with this project. Their loan of a vehicle when mine broke down proved especially invaluable. This work was supported in paxt by the BC Nursery Trades Association, Agriculture and Agri-Foods Canada, three SFU Graduate Fellowships, the H.R. MacCarthy Graduate Bursary, the Thelma Finlayson Graduate Fellowship, and the BC Councii of Garden Clubs Pxize. Table of Contents APPROVAL ............................................................................................................. i ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.... ........................... .... ...................................................... iv TABLE OF C0NTENTSaeo.o. ...........b.~*b.~wm.~....w..........~...*..........~~* *.**v LIST OF TABLES .......................... ................... W LIST OF FIGURES .............................m...................................................................ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Rom WEEWLS .............................................................................................................1 1.1.1 Black vine weeuil .................................................................................................1 1.1.2 Strawberry root weevil, rough strawbeny roof weeuil. and clay colored weevil .... 4 1.1.3 Woods weevil .................................................................................................... 7 1.1.4 Ban/peieithespellucidus ........................................................................................8 1.1.5 Increasing impact ................................................................................................8 L 1.1.6 Control Options .................................................................................................... 9 1.1 . 7 Examples of p hysical crintrols............................................................................ 12 1.1.8 Potential for root weevil management using physid control ..............................14 1.2 OWECTNES.............................................................................................................. 15 2.0 MATERIALS AND MJ3THODS ............................... .......... ............................ 17 2.1 EFFECTOF POWDER AND FLUON ON WEEVIL CLIMBING ABILiTY ...........................................17 2.2 TEST OF PHYSICAL BARRIERS SURROUNDINC) SMALL PLOTS OF RHODODENDRONS AND AZALEAS 18 2.3 PHYSICALBARRIERS SURROUNDINO SMALL PLOTS OF STRAWBERRIES ................................. 2 1 2.4 ESCAPEFROM PARALLEL TRENCHES ...............................................................................23 2.5 BLACKVINE WEEVIL CONTAINMENT IN SMALL ENCLOSURES .......................................... 24 2.6 EFFECTOF CONDENSATION ON BLACK VINE WEEVIL ESCAPES ............................................28 3.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................... 29 3.1 EFFECT OF POWDER AND FLUON ON WEEVIL CLIMBINO ABILITY ........................................... 29 3.2 PHYSICALBARRIERS SURROUNDING SMALL PLOTS OF RHODODENDRONS AND AZALEAS ..........-29 3.3 TEST OF PHYSICAL BARRIERS SURROUNDING SMALL PLOTS OF STRAWBERRIES .......................34 3.3.1 Weevil catches ...................................................................................................34 3.3.2 Ground beetle catches .......................................................................................39 3.3.3 Plant health ....................................................................................................... 42 3.3.4 Bam'er tueuthering ............................................................................................42 3.4 ESCAPERATE FROM PARALLEL TRENCHES ....................................................................... 45 3.4.1 Pitfall trap catches ............................................................................................. 45 3.4.2 nench catches .................................................................................................49 3.4.3 Trench weathering .............................................................................................49 3.5 BLACKVINE WEEVIL CONTAINMENT WiTHIN SMALL ENCLOSURES ......................................... 54 3.6 EFFECTOF CONDENSATION ON BLACK VINE WEEWL ABILITY TO ESCAPE SMALL CANNISTERS ....-55 4.0 DISCUSSION ................................. ............ .................................................*.*57
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integration of Entomopathogenic Fungi Into IPM Programs: Studies Involving Weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) Affecting Horticultural Crops
    insects Review Integration of Entomopathogenic Fungi into IPM Programs: Studies Involving Weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) Affecting Horticultural Crops Kim Khuy Khun 1,2,* , Bree A. L. Wilson 2, Mark M. Stevens 3,4, Ruth K. Huwer 5 and Gavin J. Ash 2 1 Faculty of Agronomy, Royal University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 2696, Dangkor District, Phnom Penh, Cambodia 2 Centre for Crop Health, Institute for Life Sciences and the Environment, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia; [email protected] (B.A.L.W.); [email protected] (G.J.A.) 3 NSW Department of Primary Industries, Yanco Agricultural Institute, Yanco, New South Wales 2703, Australia; [email protected] 4 Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University), Wagga Wagga, New South Wales 2650, Australia 5 NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wollongbar Primary Industries Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2477, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +61-46-9731208 Received: 7 September 2020; Accepted: 21 September 2020; Published: 25 September 2020 Simple Summary: Horticultural crops are vulnerable to attack by many different weevil species. Fungal entomopathogens provide an attractive alternative to synthetic insecticides for weevil control because they pose a lesser risk to human health and the environment. This review summarises the available data on the performance of these entomopathogens when used against weevils in horticultural crops. We integrate these data with information on weevil biology, grouping species based on how their developmental stages utilise habitats in or on their hostplants, or in the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Root Weevils Ryan Davis Arthropod Diagnostician
    Published by Utah State University Extension and Utah Plant Pest Diagnostic Laboratory ENT-193-18 May 2018 Root Weevils Ryan Davis Arthropod Diagnostician Quick Facts • Root weevils are a group of small, black-to-brown weevils that commonly damage ornamental and small fruit plants in Utah. • Adult root weevil damage is characterized by marginal leaf notching and occasional feeding on buds and young shoots. • Larval root weevil damage occurs below ground; damage to roots can lead to canopy decline or plant death. • Root weevils are occasional nuisance pests in homes and structures mid-summer through fall. • Manage root weevil larvae by applying a systemic insecticide to the soil around host plants April through September. • Adults feeding on the above-ground portion of plants can be targeted with pyrethroid pesticides Black vine weevil adult (Kent Loeffler, Cornell University, Bugwood.org) starting in late June or early July. IDENTIFICATION INTRODUCTION Root weevils are small beetles ranging in length from about 1/4 to 1/3 inch depending on The black vine weevil (Otiorhynchus sulcatus), species. Coloration is variable, but the commonly lilac root weevil (O. meridionalis) strawberry weevil encountered species in Utah are black with gold (O. ovatus) and rough strawberry root weevil (O. flecks (black vine weevil) or solid brown to black, rugosostriatus) are a complex of non-native, snout- shiny or matte. As a member of the weevil family nosed beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) that (Curculionidae), these pests have a snout, but it cause damage to ornamentals and small fruit crops is shortened and rectangular compared to other in Utah. Root weevils are occasional nuisance pests weevils that have long, skinny mouthparts.
    [Show full text]
  • Root Weevils Fact Sheet No
    Root Weevils Fact Sheet No. 5.551 Insect Series|Home and Garden by W.S. Cranshaw* None of the root weevils can fly and A root weevil is a type of “snout beetle” they are night active, hiding during the Quick Facts that develops on the roots of various plants. day around the base of host plants, usually Adult stages produce more conspicuous under a bit of cover. About an hour after • Root weevils can be common plant damage, cutting angular notches along sunset they become active and crawl onto insects that develop on roots the edge of leaves when they feed at night. the plants to feed on leaves, producing their of many garden plants. Adult root weevils also may attract attention characteristic angular notches. If disturbed, • Adult root weevils chew when they wander into buildings, acting as a root weevils will readily drop from plants and distinctive notches along the temporary “nuisance invader”. play dead. The most common root weevils found Adults typically live for at least a couple edges of leaves at night. in Colorado are strawberry root weevil of months, and some may be present into • Some kinds of root weevils (Otiorhynchus ovatus), rough strawberry autumn. Most eggs are laid in late spring and often wander into homes but root weevil (O. rugostriatus), black vine early summer with females squeezing eggs cause no injury indoors. weevil (O. sulcatus) and lilac root weevil into soil cracks. A few days after they are (O. meridionalis). Dyslobus decoratus is laid, eggs hatch and the larvae move to the • Insecticides applied on the established in some areas and chews leaves roots where they feed.
    [Show full text]
  • IOBC/WPRS Working Group “Integrated Plant Protection in Fruit
    IOBC/WPRS Working Group “Integrated Plant Protection in Fruit Crops” Subgroup “Soft Fruits” Proceedings of Workshop on Integrated Soft Fruit Production East Malling (United Kingdom) 24-27 September 2007 Editors Ch. Linder & J.V. Cross IOBC/WPRS Bulletin Bulletin OILB/SROP Vol. 39, 2008 The content of the contributions is in the responsibility of the authors The IOBC/WPRS Bulletin is published by the International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, West Palearctic Regional Section (IOBC/WPRS) Le Bulletin OILB/SROP est publié par l‘Organisation Internationale de Lutte Biologique et Intégrée contre les Animaux et les Plantes Nuisibles, section Regionale Ouest Paléarctique (OILB/SROP) Copyright: IOBC/WPRS 2008 The Publication Commission of the IOBC/WPRS: Horst Bathon Luc Tirry Julius Kuehn Institute (JKI), Federal University of Gent Research Centre for Cultivated Plants Laboratory of Agrozoology Institute for Biological Control Department of Crop Protection Heinrichstr. 243 Coupure Links 653 D-64287 Darmstadt (Germany) B-9000 Gent (Belgium) Tel +49 6151 407-225, Fax +49 6151 407-290 Tel +32-9-2646152, Fax +32-9-2646239 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Address General Secretariat: Dr. Philippe C. Nicot INRA – Unité de Pathologie Végétale Domaine St Maurice - B.P. 94 F-84143 Montfavet Cedex (France) ISBN 978-92-9067-213-5 http://www.iobc-wprs.org Integrated Plant Protection in Soft Fruits IOBC/wprs Bulletin 39, 2008 Contents Development of semiochemical attractants, lures and traps for raspberry beetle, Byturus tomentosus at SCRI; from fundamental chemical ecology to testing IPM tools with growers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curculionoidea of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) (Coleoptera)
    BULLETIN OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALTA (2010) Vol. 3 : 55-143 The Curculionoidea of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) (Coleoptera) David MIFSUD1 & Enzo COLONNELLI2 ABSTRACT. The Curculionoidea of the families Anthribidae, Rhynchitidae, Apionidae, Nanophyidae, Brachyceridae, Curculionidae, Erirhinidae, Raymondionymidae, Dryophthoridae and Scolytidae from the Maltese islands are reviewed. A total of 182 species are included, of which the following 51 species represent new records for this archipelago: Araecerus fasciculatus and Noxius curtirostris in Anthribidae; Protapion interjectum and Taeniapion rufulum in Apionidae; Corimalia centromaculata and C. tamarisci in Nanophyidae; Amaurorhinus bewickianus, A. sp. nr. paganettii, Brachypera fallax, B. lunata, B. zoilus, Ceutorhynchus leprieuri, Charagmus gressorius, Coniatus tamarisci, Coniocleonus pseudobliquus, Conorhynchus brevirostris, Cosmobaris alboseriata, C. scolopacea, Derelomus chamaeropis, Echinodera sp. nr. variegata, Hypera sp. nr. tenuirostris, Hypurus bertrandi, Larinus scolymi, Leptolepurus meridionalis, Limobius mixtus, Lixus brevirostris, L. punctiventris, L. vilis, Naupactus cervinus, Otiorhynchus armatus, O. liguricus, Rhamphus oxyacanthae, Rhinusa antirrhini, R. herbarum, R. moroderi, Sharpia rubida, Sibinia femoralis, Smicronyx albosquamosus, S. brevicornis, S. rufipennis, Stenocarus ruficornis, Styphloderes exsculptus, Trichosirocalus centrimacula, Tychius argentatus, T. bicolor, T. pauperculus and T. pusillus in Curculionidae; Sitophilus zeamais and
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan
    Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan June 2005 Martin Nugent, Chair Wildlife Diversity Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife PO Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 (503) 872-5260 x5346 FAX: (503) 872-5269 [email protected] Kev Alexanian Dan Hilburn Sam Chan Bill Reynolds Suzanne Cudd Eric Schwamberger Risa Demasi Mark Systma Chris Guntermann Mandy Tu Randy Henry 7/15/05 Table of Contents Chapter 1........................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 What’s Going On?........................................................................................................................................ 3 Oregon Examples......................................................................................................................................... 5 Goal............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Invasive Species Council................................................................................................................. 6 Statute ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Functions .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Disturbance and Recovery of Litter Fauna: a Contribution to Environmental Conservation
    Disturbance and recovery of litter fauna: a contribution to environmental conservation Vincent Comor Disturbance and recovery of litter fauna: a contribution to environmental conservation Vincent Comor Thesis committee PhD promotors Prof. dr. Herbert H.T. Prins Professor of Resource Ecology Wageningen University Prof. dr. Steven de Bie Professor of Sustainable Use of Living Resources Wageningen University PhD supervisor Dr. Frank van Langevelde Assistant Professor, Resource Ecology Group Wageningen University Other members Prof. dr. Lijbert Brussaard, Wageningen University Prof. dr. Peter C. de Ruiter, Wageningen University Prof. dr. Nico M. van Straalen, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Prof. dr. Wim H. van der Putten, Nederlands Instituut voor Ecologie, Wageningen This research was conducted under the auspices of the C.T. de Wit Graduate School of Production Ecology & Resource Conservation Disturbance and recovery of litter fauna: a contribution to environmental conservation Vincent Comor Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Monday 21 October 2013 at 11 a.m. in the Aula Vincent Comor Disturbance and recovery of litter fauna: a contribution to environmental conservation 114 pages Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands (2013) With references, with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN 978-94-6173-749-6 Propositions 1. The environmental filters created by constraining environmental conditions may influence a species assembly to be driven by deterministic processes rather than stochastic ones. (this thesis) 2. High species richness promotes the resistance of communities to disturbance, but high species abundance does not.
    [Show full text]
  • Microhabitat Heterogeneity Enhances Soil Macrofauna and Plant Species Diversity in an Ash – Field Maple Woodland
    Title Microhabitat heterogeneity enhances soil macrofauna and plant species diversity in an Ash – Field Maple woodland Authors Burton, VJ; Eggleton, P Description publisher: Elsevier articletitle: Microhabitat heterogeneity enhances soil macrofauna and plant species diversity in an Ash – Field Maple woodland journaltitle: European Journal of Soil Biology articlelink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.04.012 content_type: article copyright: © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Date Submitted 2016-07-15 1 Microhabitat heterogeneity enhances soil macrofauna and plant species diversity in an Ash - Field 2 Maple woodland 3 4 Victoria J. Burtonab*, Paul Eggletona 5 aSoil Biodiversity Group, Life Sciences Department, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, 6 London SW7 5BD, UK 7 bImperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK 8 *corresponding author email [email protected] 9 10 Abstract 11 The high biodiversity of soil ecosystems is often attributed to their spatial heterogeneity at multiple 12 scales, but studies on the small-scale spatial distribution of soil macrofauna are rare. This case study 13 of an Ash-Field Maple woodland partially converted to conifer plantation investigates differences 14 between species assemblages of soil and litter invertebrates, and plants, using multivariate 15 ordination and indicator species analysis for eleven microhabitats. 16 Microhabitats representing the main body of uniform litter were compared with more localised 17 microhabitats including dead wood and areas of wet soil. Species accumulation curves suggest that 18 for this site it is more efficient to sample from varied microhabitats of limited spatial scale rather 19 than the broad habitat areas when generating a species inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • Nematop® Black Vine Weevil
    THE PROBLEM: THE PEST (OTIORHYNCHUS SULCATUS): Ju un l A J ug y a S e M p Characteristic notching of leaves r O p caused by adult weevils. c ® A t r N nematop a o M By far the most severe v b D Effective Biological Control of e e F damage is caused by the c n J larvae, which feed on roots, a Black Vine Weevil rhizomes and the bases of woody stems. They may girdle the root crown, and strip bark from woody stems. Even large Life cycle of vine weevil (Optimum times for plants can wither and die application of nematodes indicated in red) within a short period of time. The adult weevils (ca. 8-13 mm long) emerge from late May to early July. They feed on leaves at night, and hide By examining the stem base and the root-zone area, during the day in the soil or under litter. Laying of eggs the larvae can be detected at an early stage and may begin after 3-4 weeks, and larvae hatch some 2-3 effectively controlled with nematop®! weeks later. Root damage from larval feeding is most severe through the autumn, and again in the spring as Plants attacked: temperatures begin to rise. Larvae over-winter deeper in More than 200 species of crop plants and ornamentals the soil and finally pupate in late spring. are known to be particularly susceptible to vine weevil attack, including strawberry, raspberry, blackcurrant, nematop® is only effective against larvae and pupae and blueberry, grapevine, yew, rhododendron, azalea, should therefore be applied during April / May and from euonymus, camellia, cyclamen, rose, geranium, and August to the end of September.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Lags and Overlap in the Diversification of Weevils and Flowering Plants
    Temporal lags and overlap in the diversification of weevils and flowering plants Duane D. McKennaa,1, Andrea S. Sequeirab, Adriana E. Marvaldic, and Brian D. Farrella aDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; bDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481; and cInstituto Argentino de Investigaciones de Zonas Aridas, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Te´cnicas, C.C. 507, 5500 Mendoza, Argentina Edited by May R. Berenbaum, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved March 3, 2009 (received for review October 22, 2008) The extraordinary diversity of herbivorous beetles is usually at- tributed to coevolution with angiosperms. However, the degree and nature of contemporaneity in beetle and angiosperm diversi- fication remain unclear. Here we present a large-scale molecular phylogeny for weevils (herbivorous beetles in the superfamily Curculionoidea), one of the most diverse lineages of insects, based on Ϸ8 kilobases of DNA sequence data from a worldwide sample including all families and subfamilies. Estimated divergence times derived from the combined molecular and fossil data indicate diversification into most families occurred on gymnosperms in the Jurassic, beginning Ϸ166 Ma. Subsequent colonization of early crown-group angiosperms occurred during the Early Cretaceous, but this alone evidently did not lead to an immediate and ma- jor diversification event in weevils. Comparative trends in weevil diversification and angiosperm dominance reveal that massive EVOLUTION diversification began in the mid-Cretaceous (ca. 112.0 to 93.5 Ma), when angiosperms first rose to widespread floristic dominance. These and other evidence suggest a deep and complex history of coevolution between weevils and angiosperms, including codiver- sification, resource tracking, and sequential evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology, Distribution and Economic Thresholdof
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Joseph Francis Cacka for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology presented on February 1, 1982 Title: BIOLOGY, DISTRIBUTION AND ECONOMICTHRESHOLD OF THE STRAWBERRY ROOT WEEVIL, OTIORHYNCHUS OVATUS (L.),IN PEPPERMINT Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: Rarph E. Berryd-- This study of the strawberryroot weevil, Otiorhynchus ovatus (L.), on peppermint, Mentha piperita (L.), incentral Oregon provided biological information toassess economic importance and to develop a sequential sampling plan. Teneral adult weevils emergedfrom the soil from late May until late July. Oviposition of new generation adultscommenced in early July. A minimum 12 day egg incubationperiod was observed. Larvae were present in peppermint fields allyear and were the dominant life stage from late August until mid-Maythe following year. Pupation commenced during early to mid-May andwas completed by late June.Overwintered adults were found in spring samplesat densities not greater than 11.6% of the sampled population. Developed ova were observed in theover- wintered adults in late May. A carabid beetle, Pterostichus vulgaris (L.), was predaceouson larval, pupal and adult strawberry root weevils, no other predators or parasiteswere observed. Fall plowing of peppermint fieldsincreased the depth at which weevils were found the followingspring. When fields are sampled in mid-May, a minimum depth of 15cm is suggested for fall plowed fields and ten cm for unplowed fields. Strawberry root weevil adults,pupae, larvae and the total of all these life stages havea clumped distribution that fit the negative binomial distribution whensufficient data were available to determine frequency distributions. Statistically significant negativerelationships were found between pupae, larvae and the total strawberryroot weevil population and peppermint oil yields.
    [Show full text]
  • Weevils) of the George Washington Memorial Parkway, Virginia
    September 2020 The Maryland Entomologist Volume 7, Number 4 The Maryland Entomologist 7(4):43–62 The Curculionoidea (Weevils) of the George Washington Memorial Parkway, Virginia Brent W. Steury1*, Robert S. Anderson2, and Arthur V. Evans3 1U.S. National Park Service, 700 George Washington Memorial Parkway, Turkey Run Park Headquarters, McLean, Virginia 22101; [email protected] *Corresponding author 2The Beaty Centre for Species Discovery, Research and Collection Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, ON. K1P 6P4, CANADA;[email protected] 3Department of Recent Invertebrates, Virginia Museum of Natural History, 21 Starling Avenue, Martinsville, Virginia 24112; [email protected] ABSTRACT: One-hundred thirty-five taxa (130 identified to species), in at least 97 genera, of weevils (superfamily Curculionoidea) were documented during a 21-year field survey (1998–2018) of the George Washington Memorial Parkway national park site that spans parts of Fairfax and Arlington Counties in Virginia. Twenty-three species documented from the parkway are first records for the state. Of the nine capture methods used during the survey, Malaise traps were the most successful. Periods of adult activity, based on dates of capture, are given for each species. Relative abundance is noted for each species based on the number of captures. Sixteen species adventive to North America are documented from the parkway, including three species documented for the first time in the state. Range extensions are documented for two species. Images of five species new to Virginia are provided. Keywords: beetles, biodiversity, Malaise traps, national parks, new state records, Potomac Gorge. INTRODUCTION This study provides a preliminary list of the weevils of the superfamily Curculionoidea within the George Washington Memorial Parkway (GWMP) national park site in northern Virginia.
    [Show full text]