See a Timeline of Key Milestones in the Life of the School Breakfast

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

See a Timeline of Key Milestones in the Life of the School Breakfast Key Milestones in the Life of the School Breakfast Program By Janet Poppendieck 1966: The Child Nutrition Act establishes the School Breakfast Program as a pilot program giving priority to schools in areas with poor economic conditions and schools to which children traveled long distances to attend. Schools designated as “Severe Need” are eligible for greater assistance. The same Act authorizes funds for Non-food Assistance (equipment) and State Administrative Expenses and clarifies that all federal child nutrition programs are to be administered by USDA. 1968: Their Daily Bread, a report on the National School Lunch Program by a coalition of national women’s organizations, focuses national attention on the failure of school food programs to meet the needs of low-income children. Hunger in America becomes a major public issue. Congress authorizes use of funds (in addition to commodities) from Section 32 to expand provision of meals to needy children. 1968: Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs is established. 1969: The Black Panther Party begins serving breakfast to schoolchildren in major cities across the nation. 1969: The Food and Consumer Service is established within the USDA to oversee all food assistance programs. 1970: Amendments to the National School Lunch Act establish uniform minimum national income eligibility guidelines for free and reduced price meals. 1971: School Breakfast Program is required to use the same income eligibility guidelines as the National School Lunch Program. USDA orders a freeze on the number of schools in the School Breakfast program and proposes regulations restricting the use of Section 32 funds for school food. Congress passes an Emergency Resolution to prevent these proposals from taking effect. 1972: Guaranteed minimum reimbursement rates for school lunches are established by Congress, and the Secretary of Agriculture is required to establish national average payments to states for each breakfast served. 1973: Performance Funding replaces categorical grants as basic funding structure for school meals. Minimum mandatory reimbursement rates are established by Congress for full price, reduced price, and free school breakfasts and for free breakfasts in severe need schools, and reimbursement rates for both lunch and breakfast are required to be adjusted semi-annually for inflation. 1975: The School Breakfast Program is made permanent. 1977: Amendments require states to establish eligibility standards for severe need schools. 1977: Provision Two is added to Section 11 of the NSLA, permitting schools that agree to serve meals free of charge to all students to collect applications in a base year and apply the percentages of free, reduced price and full price eligible meals from that year to three subsequent years without collecting additional applications. 1978: Congress establishes criteria that states must use to determine which schools qualify for severe need reimbursement, including all schools in which at least 40% of lunches were served free or at a reduced price, and all schools in states with statewide School Breakfast Mandates. 1980: The first set of Dietary Guidelines for Healthy Americans is issued. 1980: Budget Cuts, Round 1: The Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1980 reduces the income eligibility standards for free and reduced price meals, cuts reimbursement rates, replaces semi- annual inflation adjustments with a single annual adjustment, and eliminates School Breakfast Commodity Assistance. 1981: Budget cuts Round 2: The Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1981 further lowers income eligibility standards and reduced reimbursements for paid and reduced price breakfasts. The maximum allowable charge for a reduced price breakfast is raised from 10 cents to 30 cents. The provision of severe-need rate reimbursements for all meals served in schools with a statewide mandate is eliminated. Between fiscal year 1981 and fiscal year 1982, participation in the School Breakfast Program declines for the first time since the program’s creation. The biggest drops are in the paid and reduced price categories, but because whole schools and districts drop out of the program, the number of free breakfasts declines as well. 1981: The Reagan Administration proposes new, weakened nutrition standards as a way of cutting costs in school food programs (ketchup as a vegetable). Congress rebuffs the effort after advocates publicize it widely. 1983: USDA releases the final report of the National Evaluation of School Nutrition Programs, which shows that breakfasts in the SBP are low in vitamin A, vitamin B6 and iron. 1986: Congress adds 3 cents to the reimbursement rates for school breakfasts and authorizes 3 cents of commodities per meal when available in USDA holdings. Congress directs the Secretary of Agriculture to improve the nutrition standards for school breakfast. 1986: Offer Versus Serve (OVS) becomes an option in all school breakfast programs. (Breakfasts are reimbursable when students take at least three of the four components offered). Children in families receiving Food Stamps and AFDC are made automatically eligible for free school meals. 1988: The Hunger Prevention Act of 1988 adds three cents to the school breakfast subsidy. 1989: Congress authorizes five years of grant funding for school breakfast start-up costs. 1993: The School Nutrition Dietary Assessment is released by USDA; it finds that school breakfasts are high in saturated fat and sodium. 1994: The Healthy Meals for Healthy Americans Act required that school meals comply with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. USDA launches Team Nutrition and the School Meals Initiative to help schools improve the nutritional profile of school meals. 1996: Legislation consolidating child nutrition programs into child nutrition block grants to the states, and thus ending the entitlement status, performance funding, and national nutrition standards, passes the House of Representatives but fails in the Senate, and the Senate prevails in conference. 1998: Congress directs USDA to conduct a pilot test of universal free school breakfasts. The School Breakfast Pilot Project studies the impact of providing universal free school breakfasts in six school districts across the US. 2004: The Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act requires direct certification to be phased in, requires schools to develop wellness plans, and extends the certification period to one year, ending the requirement for reporting of income changes within the school year. 2005: The new Dietary Guidelines for Americans have substantial implications for school meals. USDA asks the Institute of Medicine to craft new nutrition standards that reflect the latest science. 2010: First Lady Michele Obama launches the “Let’s Move” campaign to combat childhood obesity. 2010: Share Our Strength launches the No Kid Hungry campaign, focusing on summer meals and school breakfast. 2010: Congress passes the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act, which directs USDA to raise nutrition standards for both breakfast and lunch, establishes standards for snacks sold at school, and creates the Community Eligibility Option. 2011: The Community Eligibility Program becomes available in the first three pilot states. 2013: West Virginia passes the Feed to Achieve Act, requiring every school in the state to adopt at least one alternative delivery method for School Breakfast, and declaring an official goal to provide universal free school breakfast for all children in West Virginia through public- private partnerships. Eight states follow suit over the next three years. 2014: The Community Eligibility Option becomes available to eligible schools in all states and the District of Columbia. 2014: Congress passes a waiver of the whole grain requirement and a delay in implementing sodium reductions in school meals as part of an omnibus spending bill. 2016: The School Breakfast Program celebrates its 50th birthday on October 11th. .
Recommended publications
  • Legislative History Related to Farm to School
    Legislative History Related to Farm to School 1946: National School Lunch Act On June 4, 1946, President Harry S. Truman signed the National School Lunch Act (NSLA), which permanently authorized the National School Lunch Program. The legislation was passed in response to concerns that “many American men had been rejected for World War II military service because of diet-related health problems.” Its purpose was to provide a market for agricultural production and to improve the health and well-being of the nation’s youth. 1966: Child Nutrition Act On October 11, 1966, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Child Nutrition Act (CNA), which added a new dimension to school food services. In its Declaration of Purpose in Section 2 of the Act, the Congress stated, "In recognition of the demonstrated relationship between food and good nutrition and the capacity of children to develop and learn, based on the years of cumulative successful experience under the NSLP with its significant contributions in the field of applied nutrition research, it is hereby declared to be the policy of Congress that these efforts shall be extended, expanded, and strengthened under the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture as a measure to safeguard the health and well-being of the Nation's children, and to encourage the domestic consumption of agricultural and other foods, by assisting States, through grants-in-aid and other means, to meet more effectively the nutritional needs of our children.” CNA expanded the NSLP, established the School Breakfast Program (SBP), extended the Special Milk Program (SMP), and provided Federal funding assistance towards non-food purchases for school equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program
    Food and Nutrition Service DATE: November 14, 2018 Park Office Center MEMO CODE: SP 03-2019 3101 Park SUBJECT: National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program: Center Drive Alexandria Questions and Answers for Charter Schools VA 22302 TO: Regional Directors Special Nutrition Programs All Regions State Directors Child Nutrition Programs All States The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and the School Breakfast Program (SBP) along with other Child Nutrition Programs (CNPs) administered by the USDA Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) make it possible for schools to serve wholesome and appealing meals to students each day. FNS recognizes the importance of providing the necessary technical assistance to all schools eligible to participate in the CNPs so that all students have access to school meals that contribute to their physical and mental well-being. To assist in this effort, FNS is providing updated Question and Answers (Q&As) to address questions we have received from charter schools. This memorandum supersedes SP 07- 2008: Charter School Involvement in the National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs, January 15, 2008. Charter schools have cited challenges to participating in the CNPs including a lack of equipment, limited access to kitchen and cafeteria facilities, and the inability to establish reliable administrative systems to receive reimbursements for eligible students. However, these challenges should not prohibit charter schools from offering school meals to students through the CNPs. Federal, State, and local administrators should encourage charter schools to leverage the Federal funding available to support school-based CNPs. Since charter schools are held to the same standards for operating CNPs as traditional public or non-profit private schools, this memorandum does not contain any new CNP policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Application National School Lunch
    OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT County District Code OF EDUCATION Name of School Food Authority (SFA) CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAMS (CNP) Street or Box PERMANENT APPLICATION NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM (NSLP), Town or City State Zip SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM (SBP), SPECIAL MILK PROGRAM (SMP), County AND/OR AFTER-SCHOOL SNACK PROGRAM (ASSP) ( ) Telephone E-Mail Fax Type of Institution: Public School Residential Child Care Institution (RCCI) Charter School Boarding School For RCCI/Boarding School Only: Total Enrollment: RCCI/Boarding School Provides Care for: Residential Students Only Both Residential and Nonresidential Students 1. Total number of sites (accredited attendance units) administered by the SFA : 2. Total number of sites (nonaccredited attendance units) administered by the SFA (i.e., Head Start sites, Even Start, etc.): 3. Total number of regular sites (attendance units) applying for: NSLP (b) SBP (c) SNB* Only (d) SMP (e) ASSP (f) CACFP** (g) SFSP*** (Must complete (Must complete (Must complete (Must complete (Must complete (Must complete (Must complete Schedule A) Schedule A) Schedules A and C) Number 8 and Schedules A and D) Schedule A) Schedule A) Schedule A) * Severe Need Breakfast Program ** Child and Adult Care Food Program ***Summer Food Service Program for Children Total number of eating sites the SFA operates for lunch (must match the number of boxes checked as eating sites under NSLP on Schedule A): Total number of kitchen units (number of locations that actual food preparation is being done): Estimated date program(s) will begin: Estimated number of days meals will be served: Oklahoma State Department of Education Child Nutrition Programs Application 1 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Nutrition Reauthorization
    Updated February 26, 2021 Child Nutrition Reauthorization (CNR): An Overview Introduction example, the law created the Community Eligibility Child nutrition reauthorization (CNR) refers to Congress’s Provision, an option within NSLP/SBP that allows eligible process of making changes to the permanent statutes that schools to provide free meals to all students. The law also authorize the child nutrition programs, the Special required USDA to update the nutrition standards for school Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and meals and establish nutrition standards for other foods sold Children (WIC), and related activities: in schools during the school day. For WIC, the law included the requirement that states transition, by October 1, 2020, the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, from their primarily paper voucher-based WIC benefits to the Child Nutrition Act of 1966, and Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT). In some cases, the new (less often) Section 32 of the Act of August 24, 1935, policies were described within the statute; in other cases, which transfers funds to the child nutrition programs the details were laid out in USDA-promulgated regulations. annually. Recent Reauthorization Efforts The most recent CNR was the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids th Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-296). Some of the authorities created During the 114 Congress, the committees then exercising or extended in that law expired on September 30, 2015. jurisdiction (the House Education and Workforce Committee and Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry However, the vast majority of program operations have continued with funding provided by appropriations acts. Committee) marked up CNR bills but reauthorization was not completed (see CRS Report R44373, Tracking Child Programs Typically Included in CNR Nutrition Reauthorization in the 114th Congress: An Overview).
    [Show full text]
  • Head Start Performance Standards | 45 CFR Chapter XIII
    Head Start Program Performance Standards 45 CFR Chapter XIII RIN 0970-AC63 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families Contents Part 1301 — Program Governance ............................................................................................................1 §1301.1 Purpose. .....................................................................................................................1 §1301.2 Governing body. .......................................................................................................1 §1301.3 Policy council and policy committee. .....................................................................2 §1301.4 Parent committees. .....................................................................................................3 §1301.5 Training. .....................................................................................................................4 §1301.6 Impasse procedures. ...................................................................................................4 Part 1302 — Program Operations ..............................................................................................................4 §1302.1 Overview. .....................................................................................................................6 Subpart A — Eligibility, Recruitment, Selection, Enrollment, and Attendance .......................6 §1302.10 Purpose. ....................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • School Nutrition Programs
    School Nutrition Programs The School Nutrition Association (SNA) was formed in 1946, the same year the National School Lunch Program was founded, and our members have been on the forefront of advocating for Child Nutrition Programs ever since. SNA represents 55,000 school nutrition professionals nationwide who are providing healthy school meals that help students succeed in the classroom and beyond. Our members include the cooks, cashiers and cafeteria managers in K through 12 schools; district level employees who oversee everything from menu planning to procurement; individuals overseeing child nutrition programs at the state agency level; and industry members working to provide healthy foods, supplies, equipment and software for school cafeterias. SNA has 49 state affiliates and thus is authority on all issues related to school meal programs. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), via the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) Agency administers several programs that provide healthy food to children including the National School Lunch Program, the School Breakfast Program, the Child and Adult Care Food Program, the Summer Food Service Program, the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program, and the Special Milk Program. Administered by State agencies, each of these programs helps fight hunger and obesity by reimbursing organizations such as schools, child care centers, and after-school programs for providing healthy meals to children. Well over half of the USDA budget is dedicated to nutrition assistance programs, which includes FNS as well as SNAP and WIC. The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) President Harry Truman established the National School Lunch Program in 1946. He did so largely in response to the number of WWII recruits that were rejected due to malnutrition.
    [Show full text]
  • 74 Part 215—Special Milk Program for Children
    Pt. 215 7 CFR Ch. II (1–1–12 Edition) company will be directed to discontinue the 215.10 Reimbursement procedures. use of the logo and statement and the matter 215.11 Special responsibilities of State agen- will be referred to the appropriate agency for cies. action to be taken against the company. 215.12 Claims against schools or child-care 6. Products that bear a CN label statement institutions. as set forth in paragraph 3(c) carry a war- 215.13 Management evaluations and audits. ranty. This means that if a food service au- 215.13a Determining eligibility for free milk thority participating in the Child Nutrition in child-care institutions. Programs purchases a CN labeled product 215.14 Nondiscrimination. and uses it in accordance with the manufac- turer’s directions, the school or institution 215.14a Procurement standards. will not have an audit claim filed against it 215.15 Withholding payments. for the CN labeled product for noncompli- 215.16 Suspension, termination and grant ance with the meal pattern requirements of closeout procedures. 7 CFR 210.10, § 220.8 or § 220.8a, whichever is 215.17 Program information. applicable, §§ 225.20, and 226.20. If a State or 215.18 Information collection/record- Federal auditor finds that a product that is keeping—OMB assigned control numbers. CN labeled does not actually meet the meal pattern requirements claimed on the label, AUTHORITY: 42 U.S.C. 1772 and 1779. the auditor will report this finding to FNS. FNS will prepare a report of the findings and § 215.1 General purpose and scope.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 111-296
    PUBLIC LAW 111–296—DEC. 13, 2010 124 STAT. 3183 Public Law 111–296 111th Congress An Act Dec. 13, 2010 To reauthorize child nutrition programs, and for other purposes. [S. 3307] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Healthy, Hunger- Free Kids Act of SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 2010. (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Healthy, 42 USC 1751 Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010’’. note. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary. TITLE I—A PATH TO END CHILDHOOD HUNGER Subtitle A—National School Lunch Program Sec. 101. Improving direct certification. Sec. 102. Categorical eligibility of foster children. Sec. 103. Direct certification for children receiving Medicaid benefits. Sec. 104. Eliminating individual applications through community eligibility. Sec. 105. Grants for expansion of school breakfast programs. Subtitle B—Summer Food Service Program Sec. 111. Alignment of eligibility rules for public and private sponsors. Sec. 112. Outreach to eligible families. Sec. 113. Summer food service support grants. Subtitle C—Child and Adult Care Food Program Sec. 121. Simplifying area eligibility determinations in the child and adult care food program. Sec. 122. Expansion of afterschool meals for at-risk children. Subtitle D—Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Sec. 131. Certification periods. Subtitle E—Miscellaneous Sec. 141. Childhood hunger research. Sec. 142. State childhood hunger challenge grants. Sec. 143. Review of local policies on meal charges and provision of alternate meals.
    [Show full text]
  • 108 STAT. 4699 Public Law 103-448 103D Congress an Act
    PUBLIC LAW 103-448—NOV. 2, 1994 108 STAT. 4699 Public Law 103-448 103d Congress An Act To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 and the National School Lunch Act Nov. 2, 1994 to promote healthy eating habits for children and to extend certain authorities contained in such Acts through fiscal year 1998, and for other purposes. LO- lbl4J Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, ?®^l**^3i ?*®^^^ for Healthy SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Americans (a) SHORT TITLE.—^This Act may be cited as the "Healthy Meals in*ter- for Healthy Americans Act of 1994". governmental (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act ^f^\^J^:r,r. is as follows: note. Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Findings. Sec. 3. Sense of Congress. TITLE I—AMENDMENTS TO NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH ACT Sec. 101. Purchase of fresh fruits and vegetables. Sec. 102. Delivery of commodities. Sec. 103. Requirement of minimum percentage of commodity assistance. Sec. 104. Combined Federal and State commodity purchases. Sec. 105. Technical assistance to ensure compliance with nutritional requirements. Sec. 106. Nutritional and other program requirements. Sec. 107. Nutritional requirements relating to provision of milk. Sec. 108. Use of free and reduced price meal eligibility information. Sec. 109. Automatic eligibility of Head Start participants. Sec. 110. Use of nutrition education and training program resources. Sec. 111. Special assistance for schools electing to serve all children free lunches or breakfaste. Sec. 112. Miscellaneous provisions and definitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 141/Wednesday, July 22, 2020
    44270 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 22, 2020 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Nutrition Act of 1966, as amended (42 1759a), maximum reimbursement rates U.S.C. 1772), the Department announces for each type of lunch are prescribed by Food and Nutrition Service the rate of reimbursement for a half-pint the Department in this Notice. These of milk served to non-needy children in maximum rates are to ensure equitable National School Lunch, Special Milk, a school or institution that participates disbursement of Federal funds to school and School Breakfast Programs, in the Special Milk Program for food authorities. National Average Payments/Maximum Children. This rate is adjusted annually Performance-based Reimbursement— Reimbursement Rates to reflect changes in the Producer Price In addition to the funding mentioned AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, Index for Fluid Milk Products, above, school food authorities certified Agriculture (USDA). published by the Bureau of Labor as meeting the meal pattern and ACTION: Notice. Statistics of the Department of Labor. nutrition standard requirements set National School Lunch and School forth in 7 CFR parts 210 and 220 are SUMMARY: This Notice announces the Breakfast Programs—Pursuant to eligible to receive performance-based annual adjustments to the national sections 11 and 17A of the Richard B. cash assistance for each reimbursable average payments, the amount of money Russell National School Lunch Act, (42 lunch served (an additional seven cents the Federal Government provides States U.S.C. 1759a and 1766a), and section 4 per lunch available beginning July 1, for lunches, afterschool snacks, and of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 2019, and adjusted annually thereafter).
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Procedures Or
    OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF DUCATION CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAMS (CNP) SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM (SFSP) APPEAL PROCEDURES In accordance with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Summer Food Service Program (SFSP) regulations 7 CFR Part 225.13 (b), the Oklahoma State Department of Education (SOE) uses the following procedures for appeals: 1. A sponsor or food service management company (FSMC) shall be notified in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested, of the grounds upon which the SDE based its action. The notice must inform the sponsor of its right to appeal. Two methods for appeal procedures are authorized: a. The sponsor may request a review of the records. Upon receipt of such a request, the SDE shall appoint a review official to conduct the review. OR b. The sponsor may request a hearing. Upon receipt of a request for a hearing, the SDE must contract with an administrative law judge to conduct the hearing. 2. The written request for a review of records or for a hearing must be filed by the sponsor no more than one week (seven days) from the date the sponsor receives the notice of the action. A hearing must be held by the review official in addition to, or in lieu of, a review of written information submitted by the sponsor only if the sponsor so specified in the letter requesting the appeal. Therefore, the written request must specify which type of appeal is requested. Mail written request to Oklahoma State Department of Education, Child Nutrition Programs, Suite 310, 2500 North Lincoln Boulevard, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105-4599.
    [Show full text]
  • School Meals Programs and Other USDA Child Nutrition Programs: a Primer
    School Meals Programs and Other USDA Child Nutrition Programs: A Primer Updated February 11, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43783 School Meals Programs and Other USDA Child Nutrition Programs: A Primer Summary The “child nutrition programs” refer to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service (USDA-FNS) programs that provide food for children in school or institutional settings. The best known programs, which serve the largest number of children, are the school meals programs: the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and the School Breakfast Program (SBP). The child nutrition programs also include the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP), which provides meals and snacks in day care and after school settings; the Summer Food Service Program (SFSP), which provides food during the summer months; the Special Milk Program (SMP), which supports milk for schools that do not participate in NSLP or SBP; and the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP), which funds fruit and vegetable snacks in select elementary schools. Funding: The vast majority of the child nutrition programs account is considered mandatory spending, with trace amounts of discretionary funding for certain related activities. Referred to as open-ended, “appropriated entitlements,” funding is provided through the annual appropriations process; however, the level of spending is controlled by benefit and eligibility criteria in federal law and dependent on the resulting levels of participation. Federal cash funding (in the form of per-meal reimbursements) and USDA commodity food support is guaranteed to schools and other providers based on the number of meals or snacks served and participant category (e.g., free meals for poor children get higher subsidies).
    [Show full text]