DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary Environment Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary Environment Plan SUMMARY ENVIRONMENT PLAN Otway deep marine seismic survey EEN17175.004-2 Summary environment plan Rev 1 09 July 2019 rpsgroup.com REPORT Document status Version Purpose of document Authored by Reviewed by Approved by Review date Rev 0 Final for submission HelSiv MikMac JerFit 21/06/2019 Rev 1 Final for submission HelSiv MikMac JerFit 02/07/2019 Approval for issue J. Fitzpatrick 09 July 2019 This report was prepared by RPS within the terms of RPS’ engagement with its client and in direct response to a scope of services. This report is supplied for the sole and specific purpose for use by RPS’ client. The report does not account for any changes relating the subject matter of the report, or any legislative or regulatory changes that have occurred since the report was produced and that may affect the report. RPS does not accept any responsibility or liability for loss whatsoever to any third party caused by, related to or arising out of any use or reliance on the report. Prepared by: Prepared for: RPS Spectrum Geo Tamara Al-Hashimi Danny Chan Principal Marine Scientist Project Coordinator Level 2, 27-31 Troode Street Level 3, 55 St Georges Terrace West Perth WA 6005 Perth WA 6000 T +61 8 9211 1111 T 09 9322 3700 E [email protected] E [email protected] EEN17175.004-2 | Summary environment plan | Rev 1 | 09 July 2019 rpsgroup.com Page ii REPORT Contents Acronyms and abbreviations .......................................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Details for Spectrum’s nominated liaison person ........................................................................... 5 1.3 Location of the activity .................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Timing of the activity ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Seismic program ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.5.1 Survey parameters .........................................................................................................10 1.6 Ocean bottom nodes ....................................................................................................................10 1.7 Survey vessels .............................................................................................................................11 1.7.1 Seismic vessel ................................................................................................................11 1.7.2 Support and chase vessels .............................................................................................11 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ...........................................................................12 2.1 Defining the EMBA for the activity ...............................................................................................12 2.1.1 Activity EMBA .................................................................................................................12 2.1.2 Oil spill EMBA .................................................................................................................12 2.2 Regional overview ........................................................................................................................13 2.2.1 South-east Marine Region ..............................................................................................13 2.3 Conservation values and sensitivities within the oil spill EMBA ...................................................13 2.3.1 Australian Marine Parks ..................................................................................................13 2.3.2 Ramsar sites ...................................................................................................................14 2.3.3 State protected areas .....................................................................................................14 2.3.4 Key ecological features ...................................................................................................15 2.4 Physical environment ...................................................................................................................15 2.5 Biological environment .................................................................................................................16 2.5.1 Threatened ecological communities ...............................................................................16 2.5.2 Benthic habitats and communities ..................................................................................16 2.5.3 Plankton ..........................................................................................................................16 2.5.4 Marine invertebrates .......................................................................................................16 2.5.5 Fish .................................................................................................................................17 2.5.6 Marine reptiles ................................................................................................................22 2.5.7 Marine mammals ............................................................................................................22 2.5.8 Birds ................................................................................................................................24 2.6 Socio-economic environment .......................................................................................................24 2.6.1 Commercial fisheries ......................................................................................................24 2.6.2 Native title, heritage and historic shipwrecks ..................................................................28 2.6.3 Tourism, recreation and recreational fishing ..................................................................29 2.6.4 Shipping ..........................................................................................................................29 2.6.5 Defence ...........................................................................................................................29 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................30 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................30 3.2 Communication and consultation .................................................................................................30 3.3 Establishing the context ...............................................................................................................30 3.4 Impact and risk assessment .........................................................................................................31 3.4.1 Impact and risk identification ..........................................................................................31 3.4.2 Impact and risk analysis and evaluation .........................................................................31 3.5 Impact and risk treatment .............................................................................................................33 3.5.1 Decision context and assessment techniques ................................................................33 3.5.2 Hierarchy of control measures ........................................................................................34 3.5.3 Demonstration of ALARP ................................................................................................34 EEN17175.004-2 | Summary environment plan | Rev 1 | 09 July 2019 rpsgroup.com Page iii REPORT 3.5.4 Demonstration of acceptable levels of risk .....................................................................35 3.6 Monitoring and review ..................................................................................................................36 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND RISK ASSESSMENT .....................................................................37 4.1 Impact 1: Underwater sound – seismic operations ......................................................................37 4.1.1 Description of impact ......................................................................................................37 4.1.2 Underwater sound modelling ..........................................................................................38 4.1.3 Predicted impacts from the Otway deep MSS ................................................................42 4.1.4 Demonstration of ALARP ................................................................................................73 4.1.5 Demonstration of acceptability........................................................................................77 4.1.6 Environmental performance outcomes and standards ...................................................79 4.2 Impact 2: Underwater sound – vessel / helicopter operations .....................................................83
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Interaction Between Giant Crab Trap and Benthic Trawl Fisheries
    Assessment of interaction between giant crab trap and benthic trawl fisheries Rafael León, Caleb Gardner, Klaas Hartmann October 2017 This report was produced by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) using data provided by the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment (DPIPWE) and the Australian Fisheries Management Authority. The authors do not warrant that the information in this document is free from errors or omissions. The authors do not accept any form of liability, be it contractual, tortious, or otherwise, for the contents of this document or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it. The information, opinions and advice contained in this document may not relate, or be relevant, to a reader’s particular circumstance. Opinions expressed by the authors are the individual opinions expressed by those persons and are not necessarily those of the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) or the University of Tasmania (UTas). IMAS Fisheries and Aquaculture Private Bag 49 Hobart TAS 7001 Australia Email: [email protected] Ph: 0409 427 366 Fax: 03 6227 8035 © Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania 2017 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies. Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Esd Assessment Manual for Wild Capture Fisheries
    THE ESD ASSESSMENT MANUAL FOR WILD CAPTURE FISHERIES Version 1 October 2003 FRDC Project 2002/086 This ‘ESD Assessment Manual’ is part of an on-going process to develop a framework for the reporting and assessment of ESD for fisheries within Australia. This edition is the first version, changes are expected to be made at regular intervals when further information indicates that significant improvements can be made. The material may be copied for use in completing assessments and reports as long as appropriate acknowledgement of the source is given. Whilst this project was originally conducted under the auspices of the SCFA, and is now a project endorsed by the Marine and Coastal Committee of the Natural Resources Management Committee (NRMC), it should not be taken as being the policy of any individual fisheries management agency. © FRDC 2002/086 Project Team Version 1 October 2003 ISBN: 1 877098 37 X Project Team Rick Fletcher (Principal Investigator) Department of Fisheries, WA Jean Chesson Bureau of Rural Science Melanie Fisher Bureau of Rural Science Keith Sainsbury CSIRO Tor Hundloe University of Queensland Correct Citation Fletcher, W.J., Chesson, J., Sainsbury, K.J., Hundloe, T., Fisher M., (2003) National ESD Reporting Framework for Australian Fisheries: The ESD Assessment Manual for Wild Capture Fisheries. FRDC Project 2002/086, Canberra, Australia. This report forms Publication No. 4 of the FRDC - ESD Reporting and Assessment Subprogram. The latest version of this report and other material related to the ESD Subprogram may be
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Support Towards a Metabolic Proxy in Fish Using Otolith Carbon Isotopes Jasmin C
    © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2020) 223, jeb217091. doi:10.1242/jeb.217091 RESEARCH ARTICLE Experimental support towards a metabolic proxy in fish using otolith carbon isotopes Jasmin C. Martino1,*,‡, ZoëA. Doubleday1,*, Ming-Tsung Chung2 and Bronwyn M. Gillanders1 ABSTRACT field metabolic rates can be difficult to measure in fish. The doubly Metabolic rate underpins our understanding of how species survive, labelled water method, which involves measuring the elimination of reproduce and interact with their environment, but can be difficult to an introduced oxygen isotope signature, is used for most air-breathing measure in wild fish. Stable carbon isotopes (δ13C) in ear stones animals but is unsuitable for fish (Nelson, 2016; Treberg et al., 2016). (otoliths) of fish may reflect lifetime metabolic signatures but Metabolic rates have therefore been measured using electromyogram experimental validation is required to advance our understanding of telemetry (Cooke et al., 2004; Quintella et al., 2009), heart rate the relationship. To this end, we reared juvenile Australasian snapper monitoring (Clark et al., 2005; Thorarensen et al., 1996) or (Chrysophrys auratus), an iconic fishery species, at different accelerometry (Metcalfe et al., 2016). However, these approaches ‘ ’ temperatures and used intermittent-flow respirometry to calculate only offer short-term snapshots of metabolic rates in live fish. standard metabolic rate (SMR), maximum metabolic rate (MMR) and Records conserved in hard-calcified structures offer a valuable absolute aerobic scope (AAS). Subsequently, we analysed δ13C and alternative to uncovering long-term and retrospective histories. oxygen isotopes (δ18O) in otoliths using isotope-ratio mass Furthermore, biogeochemical techniques can reconstruct histories spectrometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The adequacy of aging techniques in vertebrates for rapid estimation of population mortality rates from age distributions Zhao, M.; Klaassen, C.A.J.; Lisovski, S.; Klaassen, M. DOI 10.1002/ece3.4854 Publication date 2019 Document Version Other version Published in Ecology and Evolution License CC BY Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Zhao, M., Klaassen, C. A. J., Lisovski, S., & Klaassen, M. (2019). The adequacy of aging techniques in vertebrates for rapid estimation of population mortality rates from age distributions. Ecology and Evolution, 9(3), 1394-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4854 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:01 Oct 2021 1 Appendix S4.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of International Fisheries Management Regimes
    Cefas contract report C7372 A review of international fisheries management regimes Authors: Stuart A. Reeves, James B. Bell, Giulia Cambiè, Sarah L. Davie, Paul Dolder, Kieran Hyder, Hugo Pontalier, Zachary Radford & Duncan Vaughan Issue date: 02/08/2018 Cefas Document Control Title: A Review of International Fisheries Management Submitted to: Georgina Karlsson/Charlotte Wicker Date submitted: 02/08/18 Project Manager: Stuart A. Reeves Report compiled by: SAR Quality control by: Defra various & Kieran Hyder Approved by & Kieran Hyder, 8/1/2018 date: Version: 3.5a Version Control History Author Date Comment Version SAR et al. 20/06/17 Compiled from individual 2 chapters SAR et al. 19/07/17 Working version for comment 2.1 SAR et al. 1/09/17 Complete draft for comment 2.2 SAR et al. 21/11/17 Revised to take account of 3.1 comments SAR et al. 12/12/2017 Further revisions in response to 3.2 comments SAR et al. 12/12/2017 Revised structure inc. MRF 3.3 chapter SAR et al. 24/1/2018 Further corrections & enhanced 3.4 exec summary. SAR et al. 26/2/2018 Minor corrections 3.4a SAR et al. 27/7/18 Pre-publication corrections & 3.5 formatting SAR et al. 02/08/18 Fixing minor typos & formatting 3.5a A review of international fisheries management regimes Page i A review of international fisheries management regimes Page ii An international review of fisheries management regimes Authors: Stuart A. Reeves, James B. Bell, Giulia Cambiè, Sarah L. Davie, Paul Dolder, Kieran Hyder, Hugo Pontalier, Zachary Radford and Duncan Vaughan1 Issue date: 02/08/2018 Head office Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK Tel +44 (0) 1502 56 2244 Fax +44 (0) 1502 51 3865 www.cefas.defra.gov.uk Cefas is an executive agency of Defra 1 Contact Address: c/o Natural England, Suite D, Unex House, Bourges Boulevard, Peterborough, PE1 1NG.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Assessment of Harvested Fish Resources In
    Resource Assessment Framework 45 5 DATA FOR RESOURCE ASSESSMENT 5.1 Continuous or Project-Based Data There are two general methods in which data are collected for resource assessment: continuous or project-based. Continuous data are repeatedly collected from a source or sources. The expression “monitoring” is frequently used to describe this type of activity. In contrast, project-based data are obtained for a particular research project and collected to test particular scientific hypotheses. Within resource assessment, continuous data collection methods (for catch, effort, ages and lengths) are frequently used because continuous data contain information about the dynamics18 of a fish population. Dynamic relationships are the basis of assessment models that are required to make quantitative forecasts of managerial decisions. Performance reporting commitments within the FMS are annual. Although there is no stated obligation that the data that are used to compile the reports would be updated every year, there would need to be some system in place that collected up-to-date information for the reports of managerial performance. The continuous data collection programs currently underway (relevant to resource assessment) in the NSW Department of Primary Industries are: the catch-effort reporting system; fishery-independent surveys for abalone; an observer and recruitment index project for rock lobster; the gamefish tournament monitoring program; and, some monitoring of the age and length structure of commercial landings. Project-based data have been collected for particular projects. Once that project is finished and written up, no more data are collected, though the methods are well documented enabling replication of that sampling design. Individual projects can yield information very valuable to resource assessment, particularly biological information such as growth, maturity and vulnerability.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Review of Biological and Ecological Information from Fisheries Research in the South East Marine Region
    TARGETED REVIEW OF BIOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION FROM FISHERIES RESEARCH IN THE SOUTH EAST MARINE REGION FINAL REPORT B. D. Bruce, R. Bradford, R. Daley, M. Green and K. Phillips December 2002 Client: National Oceans Office Targeted review of biological and ecological information from fisheries research in the South East Marine Region Final Report B. D. Bruce, R. Bradford, R. Daley M. Green and K. Phillips* CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart * National Oceans Office December 2002 2 Table of Contents: Table of Contents:...................................................................................................................................3 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................5 Objective of review.............................................................................................................................5 Structure of review..............................................................................................................................5 Format.................................................................................................................................................6 General ecological/biological issues and uncertainties for the South East Marine Region ....................9 Specific fishery and key species accounts ............................................................................................10 South East Fishery (SEF) including the South East Trawl
    [Show full text]
  • International Symposium on Circle Hooks in Research, Management, and Conservation Abstracts*
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE. 88(3):791–815. 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.5343/bms.2012.1031 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCLE HOOKS IN RESEARCH, MANAGEMENT, AND CONSERVATION ABSTRACTS* Challenges OF circle hook adoption in Indonesian live bait long- line Fisheries by Ahmad Hafizh Adyas and Imam Musthofa Zainudin.—Since 2005, WWF-Indonesia has facilitated efforts to reduce sea turtle bycatch on tuna longlines. The onboard observer data collected between 2006 and 2010 covering 49 vessels documented 359 sea turtles harvested. While fishermen did not think this bycatch was a major problem, con- sidering the large number of vessels in the fleet there is a large potential of cumulative im- pacts. Forty vessels from Benoa-Bali and Bitung North Sulawesi have been involved in circle hook trials and adoption between 2006 and 2010, covering 128 fishing trips, 3361 settings, and using >70,000 circle hooks. The results are promising—circle hooks reduced sea turtle bycatch by 78% while catching target fish as effectively as traditional J-hooks. However, the circle hooks (C16) could not be applied in live bait fisheries due to their large size; the 5 mm shank of the circle hook was inadequate to hold the bait (typically milkfish of 15–20 cm) and also the bait typically dies faster. Given that around 90% of Indonesia’s tuna longline fleet use live bait (with shallow sets), this is a considerable issue to resolve. Other obstacles for adop- tion stem from the use of monofilament line and the basket hauling technique, and the shape and weight of the circle hooks, all of which are perceived by fishermen as making their work more difficult (e.g., harder to haul and also causes a rumpling in the line).
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Advisory Committee Scott S Chidgey Expert
    Scott Chidgey: Response to Expert Witness Statements and IAC RFI CEE Pty Ltd Environmental scientists and engineers Gas Import Jetty and Pipeline Project Environment Effects Statement (The EES) Inquiry Advisory Committee Scott S Chidgey Expert Witness Response to Marine Biodiversity to Expert Witness Statement Submissions & IAC Request for Information Prepared for: Ashurst and Hall&Wilcox Lawyers September 2020 CEE Pty Ltd Unit 4 150 Chesterville Road Cheltenham VIC 3192 03 9553 4787 cee.com.au Scott Chidgey Response to Expert Witness Statements and IAC RFI Marine Biodiversity Impact Assessment CONTENTS Response to Expert Witness Statement 1. Prof Perran Cook 3 Response to Expert Witness Statement 2. Cardno Australia Pty Ltd 8 Response to Expert Witness Statement 3. Dr Matt Edmunds 14 Response to Expert Witness Statement 4. Mr Frank Hanson 19 Response to IAC Request for Further Information 21 Declaration 29 Appendix to Item 6 30 Gas Import Jetty and Pipeline Project Environmental Effects Statement Page 2 of 41 Scott Chidgey: Response to Expert Witness Statements and IAC RFI CEE Pty Ltd Environmental scientists and engineers Response to Expert Witness Statement 1. Prof Perran Cook Professor Cook is a Professor of Chemistry at Monash University and provides a balanced discussion of matters presented in EES Technical Appendix A and its Annexure A, related to chlorine toxicity and the formation of halogenated organic compounds. My responses to his discussion are listed with reference to the Item numbers used in Prof Cook’s Statement. 1. In Item2, 3 and 4, Prof Cook discusses the derivation and acceptability of the guideline value for chlorine established by CSIRO.
    [Show full text]
  • Associate Professor Caleb Gardner
    Curriculum Vitae A ssoci ate Prof essor Caleb Gardner Contents 1. Summary 2 2. Personal Details 2 3. Qualifications 2 4. Current Employment 3 5. External Grants 3 6. Current Committee Membership 7 7. Refereed Publications 8 8. Research and Management Reports 14 9. Students 20 Caleb Gardner 16/12/2013 Page 1 Summary I have qualifications in both economics and biology which interact in research on commercial fisheries. I currently hold two positions. My main role is as the Director, Sustainable Marine Research Collaboration Agreement (SMRCA), Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, UTAS in South East Australia. This role involves supervision and resourcing of over 60 staff and 38 PhD students operating across around 150 projects. Research is mainly on the larger marine industries of farmed Atlantic salmon and wild harvest blacklip abalone and southern rock lobster. However activities also span many other operations including recreational fisheries, scalefish, crabs, scallops and oyster culture. In addition to my role as Director SMRCA, I lead several research projects dealing with wild fisheries species, generally with the objective of improving harvest strategies. I also have a smaller role in leading research activities on wild harvest fisheries at the Australian Seafood Cooperative Research Centre. Projects in this organisation are mainly related to improving economic yield and reducing ecosystem impacts through better management. Projects involve partnerships between research organisations around Australia and industry organisations including western rock lobster, southern rock lobster, abalone, finfish and prawn fisheries. Personal Details Name: Associate Professor Caleb Gardner Address: 2 Jersey St, Sandy Bay, 7005 Phone: H- +61 (03) 6224 8417 W- +61 (03) 6227 7233 Mob- 0409 427 366 Fax- +61 (03) 6227 8035 Email: [email protected] Qualifications • Bachelor of Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Systema Brachyurorum: Part I
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]