DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 196/Thursday, October 8, 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 196 / Thursday, October 8, 2020 / Notices 63527 Dated: October 5, 2020. rule established conditions for (bycatch) of marine mammals in excess Tracey L. Thompson, evaluating a harvesting nation’s of United States standards (16 U.S.C. Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable regulatory programs to address 1371(a)(2)). NMFS published Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. incidental and intentional mortality and regulations implementing these [FR Doc. 2020–22300 Filed 10–7–20; 8:45 am] serious injury of marine mammals in its statutory requirements of the MMPA in BILLING CODE 3510–22–P fisheries producing fish and fish August 2016 (81 FR 54390; August 15, products exported to the United States. 2016) (MMPA Import Provisions Rule). Specifically, fish or fish products cannot The regulations apply to any foreign DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE be imported into the United States from nation with fisheries exporting fish and commercial fishing operations that fish products to the United States, either National Oceanic and Atmospheric result in the incidental mortality or directly or through an intermediary Administration serious injury of marine mammals in nation.1 excess of United States standards. The The LOFF lists foreign commercial [Docket No. 201001–0262; RTID 0648– fisheries that export fish and fish XA338] MMPA Import Provisions Rule established an initial five-year products to the United States and that Fish and Fish Product Import exemption period during which the have been classified as either ‘‘export’’ Provisions of the Marine Mammal import prohibitions do not apply. The or ‘‘exempt’’ based on the frequency and Protection Act; Final 2020 List of exemption period allows time for likelihood of interactions or incidental Foreign Fisheries harvesting nations to develop regulatory mortality and serious injury of a marine programs to mitigate marine mammal mammal. All fisheries that export to the AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries bycatch in their respective fisheries. United States must be included on the Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and After the exemption period, fish and LOFF by January 1, 2022. A harvesting Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), fish products identified by the Assistant nation must apply for and receive a Commerce. Administrator as from export and Comparability Finding for each of its ACTION: Notice of availability. exempt fisheries in the LOFF can only export and exempt fisheries on the be imported into the United States if the LOFF to continue to export fish and fish SUMMARY: NMFS is publishing its final harvesting nation has applied for and products to the United States from those 2020 List of Foreign Fisheries (LOFF), as received a Comparability Finding from fisheries beginning January 1, 2022. required by the regulation implementing NMFS. The 2016 final rule established What do the classifications of ‘‘exempt the Fish and Fish Product Import procedures that a harvesting nation fishery’’ and ‘‘export fishery’’ mean? Provisions of the Marine Mammal must follow and conditions it must meet Protection Act (MMPA). The final 2020 to receive a Comparability Finding for a The classifications of ‘‘exempt LOFF reflects new information received fishery. The rule also established fishery’’ or ‘‘export fishery’’ determine during the comment period on provisions for intermediary nations to the criteria that a nation’s fishery must interactions between commercial ensure that such nations do not import meet to receive a Comparability Finding fisheries exporting fish and fish and re-export to the United States fish for that fishery. A Comparability products to the United States and or fish products that are subject to an Finding is required for both exempt and marine mammals and updates and import prohibition. export fisheries, but the criteria for revises the draft 2020 LOFF. NMFS This final 2020 LOFF (see https:// exempt and export fisheries differ. classified commercial fisheries in this www.fisheries.noaa.gov/foreign/ For an exempt fishery, the criteria to final 2020 LOFF into one of two international-affairs/list-foreign- receive a Comparability Finding are categories, either ‘‘export’’ or ‘‘exempt,’’ fisheries) makes updates to the final limited to conditions related only to the based upon frequency and likelihood of 2017 LOFF, which was published on prohibition of intentional killing or incidental mortality and serious injury March 16, 2018 (83 FR 11703) and the injury of marine mammals (see 50 CFR of marine mammals likely to occur draft 2020 LOFF, which was published 216.24(h)(6)(iii)(A)). For an export incidental to each fishery. The on March 17, 2020 (85 FR 15116). fishery, the criteria to receive a classification of a fishery on the final Comparability Finding include the What is the List of Foreign Fisheries? 2020 LOFF determines which regulatory conditions related to the prohibition of requirements will be applicable to that Based on information provided by intentional killing or injury of marine fishery for it to receive a Comparability nations, industry, the public, and other mammals (see 50 CFR Finding necessary to export fish and readily available sources, NMFS 216.24(h)(6)(iii)(A)) and the requirement fish products to the United States from identified nations with commercial to develop and maintain regulatory that fishery. The final 2020 LOFF can be fishing operations that export fish and programs comparable in effectiveness to found at: https:// fish products to the United States and the U.S. regulatory program for reducing www.fisheries.noaa.gov/foreign/ classified each of those fisheries based incidental marine mammal bycatch (see international-affairs/list-foreign- on their frequency of marine mammal 50 CFR 216.24(h)(6)). The definitions of fisheries. interactions as either ‘‘exempt’’ or ‘‘exempt fishery’’ and ‘‘export fishery’’ ‘‘export’’ fisheries (see Definitions are stated in the Definitions below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: below). The entire list of these export Nina Young, NMFS IASI at and exempt fisheries, organized by 1 With respect to all references to ‘‘nation’’ or [email protected], mmpa.loff@ nation (or economy), constitutes the ‘‘nations’’ in the rule, it should be noted that the noaa.gov, or 301–427–8383. LOFF. Taiwan Relations Act of 1979, Public Law 96–8, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In August Section 4(b)(1), provides that [w]henever the laws Why is the LOFF important? of the United States refer or relate to foreign 2016, NMFS published a final rule (81 countries, nations, states, governments, territories FR 54390; August 15, 2016) Under the MMPA, the United States or similar entities, such terms shall include and implementing the fish and fish product prohibits imports of commercial fish or such laws shall apply with respect to Taiwan. 22 U.S.C. 3303(b)(1). This is consistent with the United import provisions (section 101(a)(2)) of fish products caught in commercial States’ one-China policy, under which the United the MMPA (hereafter referred to as the fishing operations resulting in the States has maintained unofficial relations with MMPA Import Provisions Rule). This incidental killing or serious injury Taiwan since 1979. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:48 Oct 07, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08OCN1.SGM 08OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 63528 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 196 / Thursday, October 8, 2020 / Notices What type of fisheries are included in Frequently Asked Questions About the data, the species and distribution of the List of Foreign Fisheries? LOFF and the MMPA Import Provisions marine mammals in the area, or other Definitions Within the MMPA Import factors. The LOFF contains only those Provisions Commercial fishing operations not commercial fishing operations specifically identified in the current authorized by the harvesting nation to What is a ‘‘Comparability Finding?’’ LOFF as either exempt or export fish and export fish and fish products to A Comparability Finding is a finding fisheries are deemed to be export the United States. 50 CFR 18.3 defines by NMFS that the harvesting nation has fisheries until a revised LOFF is posted, ‘‘commercial fishing operation’’ as the implemented a regulatory program for unless the harvesting nation provides lawful harvesting of fish from the an export or exempt fishery that has met the Assistant Administrator with marine environment for profit as part of the applicable conditions specified in information to properly classify a an on-going business enterprise. This the regulations (see 50 CFR 216.24(h)) foreign commercial fishing operation does not include sport-fishing activities, subject to the additional considerations not on the LOFF. To properly classify for Comparability Findings set out in whether or not carried out by charter the foreign commercial fishing the regulations. A Comparability boat or otherwise, and whether or not operation, the Assistant Administrator Finding is required for a nation to may also request additional information the fish caught are subsequently sold. At export fish and fish products to the from the harvesting nation, as well as 50 CFR 229.2, ‘‘commercial fishing United States. To receive a consider other relevant information operation’’ is defined as the catching, Comparability Finding for an export about such commercial fishing taking, or harvesting of fish from the fishery, the harvesting nation must operations and the frequency of marine environment (or other areas maintain a regulatory program with incidental mortality and serious injury where marine mammals occur) that respect to that fishery that is comparable of marine mammals. results in the sale or barter of all or part in effectiveness to the U.S. regulatory of the fish harvested. The term includes program for reducing incidental marine What is the definition of an ‘‘exempt licensed commercial passenger fishing mammal bycatch. This requirement may fishery?’’ vessel (as defined in section 216.3 of 50 be met by developing, implementing, The definition of exempt fishery can CFR 216) activities and aquaculture and maintaining a regulatory program be found in the implementing activities.
Recommended publications
  • Porbeagle Oceanic Whitetip SCALLOPED Hammerhead VOTE YES Appendix II Endangered in Northwest Pacific

    Porbeagle Oceanic Whitetip SCALLOPED Hammerhead VOTE YES Appendix II Endangered in Northwest Pacific

    PORBEAGLE OCEANIC WHITETIP SCALLOPED HAMMERHEAD VOTE YES APPENDIX II Endangered in northwest Pacific. VOTE YES APPENDIX II VOTE YES APPENDIX II SPECIES FACTS n Hammerhead shark fins are some of the most Vulnerable globally. SPECIES NAME: Lamna nasus SPECIES NAME: SPECIES NAME: valuable on the market. FINS The warm-blooded porbeagle shark, caught Carcharhinus longimanus Sphyrna lewini SPECIES FACTS mostly for its fins for soup and its meat, is The oceanic whitetip is one of the The scalloped n Surveys in the northwest Atlantic document AT A GLANCE n The international demand for porbeagle fins distributed throughout the temperate North most widespread shark species, found hammerhead, with the hammerhead loss at up to 98 per cent, and meat has driven populations to very Atlantic Ocean throughout the world’s tropical and its distinctive head, is landings in the southwest Atlantic show low levels across their range. Studies show and Southern temperate seas. It is also one of the most one of the most recognizable sharks. It is also declines of up to 90 per cent, and declines declines of up to 90 per cent in places around Hemisphere. threatened. It is typically caught for its one of the most endangered shark species, of more than 99 per cent have occurred in the world, including the northwest Atlantic. valuable fins, which are used in soup. caught for its valuable fins to make soup. the Mediterranean. The three FIRST n Almost no international conservation or SPECIES FACTS hammerhead species DORSAL FIN FIRST DORSAL FIN FIRST DORSAL FIN management measures exist for n Studies have documented population (Sphyrna lewini, S.
  • Assessment of Interaction Between Giant Crab Trap and Benthic Trawl Fisheries

    Assessment of Interaction Between Giant Crab Trap and Benthic Trawl Fisheries

    Assessment of interaction between giant crab trap and benthic trawl fisheries Rafael León, Caleb Gardner, Klaas Hartmann October 2017 This report was produced by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) using data provided by the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment (DPIPWE) and the Australian Fisheries Management Authority. The authors do not warrant that the information in this document is free from errors or omissions. The authors do not accept any form of liability, be it contractual, tortious, or otherwise, for the contents of this document or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it. The information, opinions and advice contained in this document may not relate, or be relevant, to a reader’s particular circumstance. Opinions expressed by the authors are the individual opinions expressed by those persons and are not necessarily those of the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) or the University of Tasmania (UTas). IMAS Fisheries and Aquaculture Private Bag 49 Hobart TAS 7001 Australia Email: [email protected] Ph: 0409 427 366 Fax: 03 6227 8035 © Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania 2017 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies. Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................
  • Lamna Nasus) Inferred from a Data Mining in the Spanish Longline Fishery Targeting Swordfish (Xiphias Gladius) in the Atlantic for the 1987-2017 Period

    Lamna Nasus) Inferred from a Data Mining in the Spanish Longline Fishery Targeting Swordfish (Xiphias Gladius) in the Atlantic for the 1987-2017 Period

    SCRS/2020/073 Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 77(6): 89-117 (2020) SIZE AND AREA DISTRIBUTION OF PORBEAGLE (LAMNA NASUS) INFERRED FROM A DATA MINING IN THE SPANISH LONGLINE FISHERY TARGETING SWORDFISH (XIPHIAS GLADIUS) IN THE ATLANTIC FOR THE 1987-2017 PERIOD J. Mejuto1, A. Ramos-Cartelle1, B. García-Cortés1 and J. Fernández-Costa1 SUMMARY A total of 5,136 size observations of porbeagle were recovered for the period 1987-2017. The GLM results explained very moderately the variability of the sizes considering three main factors, suggesting minor but significant differences in some cases especially for the year factor and non-significant differences in other factors depending on the analysis. The greatest differences in the standardized mean length between some zones were caused by some large fish of unidentified sex. The standardized mean length data for the northern zones showed stability throughout the time series, very stable range of mean values and very few differences between sexes. The size distribution for northern areas indicated an FL-overall mean of 158 cm. The size showed a normal distribution confirming that a small fraction of individuals of this stock/s is available in the oceanic areas where the North Atlantic fleet is regularly fishing and the fishes are not fully recruited to those areas and / or this fishing gear up to 160 cm. The data suggests that some individuals could sporadically reach some intertropical areas of the eastern Atlantic. RÉSUMÉ Un total de 5.136 observations de taille de requins-taupes communs ont été récupérées pour la période 1987-2017. Les résultats du GLM expliquent très modérément la variabilité des tailles en tenant compte de trois facteurs principaux, ce qui suggère des différences mineures mais significatives dans certains cas, notamment pour le facteur année et des différences non significatives pour d'autres facteurs selon le type d’analyse.
  • Case Reports for Species & Habitats on the Initial Draft

    Case Reports for Species & Habitats on the Initial Draft

    OSPAR Commission, 2008: Case reports for the OSPAR List of Threatened and/or Declining Species and Habitats ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Nomination Rarity Lamna nasus, Porbeagle shark This species is very seriously depleted and only rarely encountered over most of its former OSPAR Porbeagle shark (Lamna nasus) (Bonnaterre, range although, because of its aggregating nature, 1788) seasonal target fisheries are still possible. It is not possible to estimate its population size in the OSPAR Area, and there is no guidance for the application of this criterion to highly mobile species. Sensitivity Very Sensitive. Lamna nasus is relatively slow growing, late maturing, and long-lived, bears small litters of pups and has a generation period of 20–50 years and an intrinsic rate of population increase of Geographical extent 5–7% per annum. It is also of high commercial • OSPAR Regions: I, II, III, IV, V value at all age classes (mature and immature). These factors, combined with its aggregating habit, • Biogeographic zones: make it highly vulnerable to over-exploitation and 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,22,23 population depletion by target and incidental • Region & Biogeographic zones specified for fisheries. Its resilience is also very low. The decline and/or threat: as above Canadian Recovery Assessment Report for the Northwest Atlantic stock of Lamna nasus (DFO Lamna nasus is a wide-ranging, coastal and 2005) projected that a recovery to maximum oceanic shark, but with apparently little exchange sustainable yield would take some 25 to 55 years if between adjacent populations. It has an antitropical the fishery is closed, or over 100 years if fisheries distribution in the North Atlantic and Mediterranean mortality remained at 4%.
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World

    Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World

    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
  • The Esd Assessment Manual for Wild Capture Fisheries

    The Esd Assessment Manual for Wild Capture Fisheries

    THE ESD ASSESSMENT MANUAL FOR WILD CAPTURE FISHERIES Version 1 October 2003 FRDC Project 2002/086 This ‘ESD Assessment Manual’ is part of an on-going process to develop a framework for the reporting and assessment of ESD for fisheries within Australia. This edition is the first version, changes are expected to be made at regular intervals when further information indicates that significant improvements can be made. The material may be copied for use in completing assessments and reports as long as appropriate acknowledgement of the source is given. Whilst this project was originally conducted under the auspices of the SCFA, and is now a project endorsed by the Marine and Coastal Committee of the Natural Resources Management Committee (NRMC), it should not be taken as being the policy of any individual fisheries management agency. © FRDC 2002/086 Project Team Version 1 October 2003 ISBN: 1 877098 37 X Project Team Rick Fletcher (Principal Investigator) Department of Fisheries, WA Jean Chesson Bureau of Rural Science Melanie Fisher Bureau of Rural Science Keith Sainsbury CSIRO Tor Hundloe University of Queensland Correct Citation Fletcher, W.J., Chesson, J., Sainsbury, K.J., Hundloe, T., Fisher M., (2003) National ESD Reporting Framework for Australian Fisheries: The ESD Assessment Manual for Wild Capture Fisheries. FRDC Project 2002/086, Canberra, Australia. This report forms Publication No. 4 of the FRDC - ESD Reporting and Assessment Subprogram. The latest version of this report and other material related to the ESD Subprogram may be
  • 1 a Petition to List the Oceanic Whitetip Shark

    1 a Petition to List the Oceanic Whitetip Shark

    A Petition to List the Oceanic Whitetip Shark (Carcharhinus longimanus) as an Endangered, or Alternatively as a Threatened, Species Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act and for the Concurrent Designation of Critical Habitat Oceanic whitetip shark (used with permission from Andy Murch/Elasmodiver.com). Submitted to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce acting through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Marine Fisheries Service September 21, 2015 By: Defenders of Wildlife1 535 16th Street, Suite 310 Denver, CO 80202 Phone: (720) 943-0471 (720) 942-0457 [email protected] [email protected] 1 Defenders of Wildlife would like to thank Courtney McVean, a law student at the University of Denver, Sturm college of Law, for her substantial research and work preparing this Petition. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 II. GOVERNING PROVISIONS OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT ............................................. 5 A. Species and Distinct Population Segments ....................................................................... 5 B. Significant Portion of the Species’ Range ......................................................................... 6 C. Listing Factors ....................................................................................................................... 7 D. 90-Day and 12-Month Findings ........................................................................................
  • Porbeagle Shark Lamna Nasus

    Porbeagle Shark Lamna Nasus

    Porbeagle Shark Lamna nasus Lateral View (♀) Ventral View (♀) COMMON NAMES APPEARANCE Porbeagle Shark, Atlantic Mackerel Shark, Blue Dog, Bottle-nosed • Heavily built but streamlined mackerel shark. Shark, Beaumaris Shark, Requin-Taupe Commun (Fr), Marrajo • Moderately long conical snout with a relatively large eyes. Sardinero (Es), Tiburón Sardinero (Es), Tintorera (Es). • Large first dorsal fin with a conspicuous white free rear tip. SYNONYMS • Second dorsal fin and anal fin equal-sized and set together. Squalus glaucus (Gunnerus, 1758), Squalus cornubicus (Gmelin, 1789), • Lunate caudal fin with strong keel and small secondary keel. Squalus pennanti (Walbaum, 1792), Lamna pennanti (Desvaux, 1851), Squalus monensis (Shaw, 1804), Squalus cornubiensis (Pennant, 1812), • Dorsally dark blue to grey with no patterning. Squalus selanonus (Walker, 1818), Selanonius walkeri (Fleming, 1828), • Ventrally white. Lamna punctata (Storer, 1839), Oxyrhina daekyi (Gill, 1862), Lamna • Maximum length of 365cm, though rarely to this size. NE MED ATL philippi (Perez Canto, 1886), Lamna whitleyi (Phillipps, 1935). DISTRIBUTION The Porbeagle Shark is a large, streamlined mackerel shark with a In the northern conical snout and powerful body. The first dorsal fin is large and hemisphere, the originates above or slightly behind the pectoral fins. It has a free rear Porbeagle Shark tip which is white. The second dorsal fin is tiny and is set above the occurs only in the anal fin, to which it is comparable in size. The caudal fin is strong and North Atlantic and lunate with a small terminal notch. The caudal keel is strong and, Mediterranean, uniquely for the northeast Atlantic, a smaller secondary caudal keel is whilst in the present.
  • Porbeagle TAC Fact Sheet 2008

    Porbeagle TAC Fact Sheet 2008

    Fact Sheet: Porbeagle Sharks Porbeagle sharks are: • exceptionally slow-growing and vulnerable to overfishing • heavily exploited for their valuable meat and fins • classified by IUCN as Critically Endangered off Europe • highly migratory but unprotected in international waters • legally fished in Europe counter to scientific advice, and • in urgent need of conservation measures. Biology Porbeagle sharks are exceptionally vulnerable to overexploitation and long lasting depletion due to their slow growth, late maturity, and small litters. Females do not reproduce until their teen years and give birth to only about four pups after an 8-9 month pregnancy. Like most sharks, porbeagles are top predators in marine food webs and therefore critical to keeping the ocean in balance. Fisheries today Porbeagle meat is among the most prized of all shark meat, particularly in Europe. The large fins of porbeagles are valuable for use in “shark fin soup”, an Asian delicacy. Schools of porbeagle sharks are therefore sporadically targeted, but also often kept if taken incidentally, as “bycatch”, usually by pelagic longliners. Scientists note that most hooked porbeagle sharks make it to the boat alive; many could therefore survive capture if released. Currently, vessels from France and Spain take most of the EU catch of porbeagles, through targeted fisheries and as bycatch. Boats from the UK and Ireland also land porbeagle sharks taken incidentally. Population status Intense fishing has left the Northeast Atlantic porbeagle shark stock the most depleted porbeagle population in the world. Norwegian landings from this region declined by 99% between 1936 and 2005. The IUCN-World Conservation Union includes porbeagle on their Red List of Threatened Species, as Vulnerable globally; the Northeast Atlantic population is classified as Critically Endangered.
  • Porbeagle Shark Fact Sheetforthe16 Overview Regional Efforts Toward Recovery Andsustainableuse

    Porbeagle Shark Fact Sheetforthe16 Overview Regional Efforts Toward Recovery Andsustainableuse

    Fact sheet for the 16th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP16) to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) Porbeagle shark PROPOSAL Lamna nasus # 44 Proposed action Listing on CITES Appendix II Lead proponent European Union Co-sponsors Brazil, Comoros, Croatia, Egypt Annotation Entry into effect delayed by 18 months to allow Parties to resolve technical and administrative issues ANDY MURCH Overview The porbeagle is a globally threatened, low-productivity shark that has been seriously overfished in major parts of its range primarily for international trade in meat and fins. Strong demand for these products continues to drive targeted and incidental take of porbeagles that is inadequately managed or completely unregulated. CITES Appendix II listing is warranted to facilitate compliance with relevant fishing restrictions and establishment of science-based export limits, thereby complementing national and regional efforts toward recovery and sustainable use. SHARK ADVOCATES INTERNATIONAL Protecting sharks from unsustainable trade Porbeagle shark Proposal #44 Porbeagle shark Proposal #44 Distribution countries. With North Atlantic porbeagle fisheries greatly management of the species, but have not yet led to spe- Lamna nasus is found in a circumglobal band of ~30–60oS reduced, persistent EU demand for meat is being met by cific, binding fisheries regulations. in the Southern Hemisphere and mostly between 30–70oN imports from countries without porbeagle catch limits, in the North Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean. such as Japan and South Africa, and is likely putting The EU established a total allowable catch (TAC) for greater pressure on Southern Hemisphere populations. Northeast Atlantic porbeagle in 2008 and cut it to zero for 2010.
  • A Review of International Fisheries Management Regimes

    A Review of International Fisheries Management Regimes

    Cefas contract report C7372 A review of international fisheries management regimes Authors: Stuart A. Reeves, James B. Bell, Giulia Cambiè, Sarah L. Davie, Paul Dolder, Kieran Hyder, Hugo Pontalier, Zachary Radford & Duncan Vaughan Issue date: 02/08/2018 Cefas Document Control Title: A Review of International Fisheries Management Submitted to: Georgina Karlsson/Charlotte Wicker Date submitted: 02/08/18 Project Manager: Stuart A. Reeves Report compiled by: SAR Quality control by: Defra various & Kieran Hyder Approved by & Kieran Hyder, 8/1/2018 date: Version: 3.5a Version Control History Author Date Comment Version SAR et al. 20/06/17 Compiled from individual 2 chapters SAR et al. 19/07/17 Working version for comment 2.1 SAR et al. 1/09/17 Complete draft for comment 2.2 SAR et al. 21/11/17 Revised to take account of 3.1 comments SAR et al. 12/12/2017 Further revisions in response to 3.2 comments SAR et al. 12/12/2017 Revised structure inc. MRF 3.3 chapter SAR et al. 24/1/2018 Further corrections & enhanced 3.4 exec summary. SAR et al. 26/2/2018 Minor corrections 3.4a SAR et al. 27/7/18 Pre-publication corrections & 3.5 formatting SAR et al. 02/08/18 Fixing minor typos & formatting 3.5a A review of international fisheries management regimes Page i A review of international fisheries management regimes Page ii An international review of fisheries management regimes Authors: Stuart A. Reeves, James B. Bell, Giulia Cambiè, Sarah L. Davie, Paul Dolder, Kieran Hyder, Hugo Pontalier, Zachary Radford and Duncan Vaughan1 Issue date: 02/08/2018 Head office Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK Tel +44 (0) 1502 56 2244 Fax +44 (0) 1502 51 3865 www.cefas.defra.gov.uk Cefas is an executive agency of Defra 1 Contact Address: c/o Natural England, Suite D, Unex House, Bourges Boulevard, Peterborough, PE1 1NG.
  • Atlantic Sharks at Risk

    Atlantic Sharks at Risk

    RESEARCH SERIES JUNE 2008 Risk Assessment Prompts No-Take Recommendations for Shark Species ATLANTIC SHARKS AT RISK SummARY OF AN EXPERT WORKING GROup REPORT: Simpfendorfer, C., Heupel M., Babcock, E., Baum, J.K., Dudley, S.F.J., Stevens, J.D., Fordham, S., and A. Soldo. 2008. Management Recommendations Based on Integrated Risk Assessment of Data-Poor Pelagic Atlantic Sharks. POpuLATIONS OF MANY of the world’s pelagic, or open ocean, shark and ray species are declining. Like most sharks, these species are known to be susceptible to overfishing due to low reproductive rates. Pelagic longline fisheries for tuna and swordfish catch significant numbers of pelagic sharks and rays and shark fisheries are also growing due to declines in traditional target species and the rising value of shark fins and meat. Yet, a lack of data has prevented scientists from conducting reliable population assessments for most pelagic shark and ray species, hindering effective management actions. Dr. Colin Simpfendorfer and the Lenfest Ocean Program convened an international expert working group to estimate the risk of overfishing for twelve species caught in Atlantic pelagic longline fisheries under the jurisdiction of the International Commission for the Conserva- tion of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). The scientists conducted an integrated risk assessment designed for data-poor situations for these sharks and rays. Their analysis indicated that bigeye thresher, shortfin mako and longfin mako sharks had the highest risk of overfishing while many of the other species had at least moderately high levels of risk. Based on these results, the scientists developed recommendations for limiting or prohibiting catch for the main pelagic shark and ray species taken in ICCAT fisheries.