<<

ANNA LAWTON

FUTURIST MANIFESTOES AS AN ELEMENT OF PERFORMANCE

The birth of was bombastically announced to the world from then• pages of the French newspaper, Le Figaro (29 February 1909). The announce- ment, "The Founding and " by the Italian poet F. T. Marinetti, started a trend of manifesto writing which expanded beyond the Italian movement to the world avant-garde. The influence of Futurism on the many avant-garde movements that mush- roomed all over in the years immediately preceding and following is undeniable. Russia was the only country besides Italy, how- ever, where Futurism as such became a banner for the. most radical groups of artists and poets. The differences between the Italian and the Russian modes of Futurism are many and varied, and the Russian Futurists were the first to place a great deal of emphasis on them. The desire to dissociate themselves from the Italians is shown in several heated declarations and in their boycott of Marinetti's visit to Russia in 1914.1 The basic aesthetic principles of Futur- ism are common to the two countries, however, and are evident in the Futur- ists' experiments in several art fields, among which is the field of theatrical performance. The Futurist contribution to the development of modern theater began to to be studied and assessed approximately twenty years ago, when the cultural revolution of the 1960s, both in Europe and in the United States, stirred aft interest in avant-garde movements and in Futurism in particular. The funda- mental text that appeared in those years is Michael Kirby's Futurist Perfor- mance. Several other books with a focus either on modern theater or on Futurism in general also devoted some attention to the role the Futurists played in the renewal of theatrical forms and in the broadening of the per- formance space, from stage to streets and squares.3

1. For a detailed analysis of the divergencies and convergencies between the two modes of Futurism, see my article, "Russian and Italian Futurist Manifestoes," Slavic and East European Journal, 20, No. 4 (Winter 1976), 405-20. 2. Michael Kirby, Futurist Performance (New York: Dutton, 1971). 3. Giovanni Antonucci, Lo spettacolo futurista in Italia (Roma: Nuova Universale Stadium, 1974); idem, Cronache del teatro futurista (Roma: Edizioni Abete, 1975); Francesco Cangiullo, Le serate futuriste (Milano: Casa Editrice Ceschina, 1961); Rosa Trillo Clough, Futurism: The Story of a Modern -A New Appraisal (New The sense of performance that pervaded all Futurists public appearances was partly due to a utilitarian motivation-to get publicity. On a deeper level, however, it reflected the most vital impulse of the movement. Futurism, as the expression of a new sensibility, was an attempt to integrate all art forms with the reality of the big city, and ultimately to transform everyday life into an aesthetic performance. The Italian critic, Germano Celant thinks that Futurism was the first mass-oriented aesthetic movement: "Apart from the strong political ambiguities and increasing connotations of exaggerated mas- culinity that drove the Futurist movement into the foul den of Italian fascism, Filippo Tommaso Marinetti and his followers created at the beginning of this century a truly 'contemporary' cultural phenomenon. Indeed, although it assumed tasks that exceeded its real possibilities, because the ideological and philosophical foundations were lacking, Futurism was the first artistic move- ment of mass society.: It grew out of a period that was experiencing the growth of quantitative and consumer impulses at the expense of qualitative and elitist ones. It was aware of the arrival of the mass media and prophesied the end of an avant-garde destined to be buried-today-under mass creativity."4 The Futurists with their iconoclastic fervor demystified many taboos and brought art down to a level supposedly accessible to the masses. Their interest in fashion, design, cuisine, and other aspects of cultural and political life at- tests to the concept of Futurism as a global integration of art and life.5 In recent times, we have witnessed a tendency to lower art to the level of con- sumer products, from Pop to Christo's artificial landscapes, from theatrical to rock festivals. Whether this tendency is a direct development of Futurist theory and practice remains to be seen, but it is undeniable that Futurism, notwithstanding all its formal experimentation and its we-against-

York: Philosophical Library, 1961); Frantisek Deak, "Two Manifestoes: The Influence of Italian Futurism in Russia," The Drama Review, 19, No. 4 (1975), 88-94; H. M. Ge- duld and R. Gottesman, eds., Robots Robots Robots (Greenwich, Conn.: New York Graphic Society, 1978); E. T. Kirby, ed., Total Theater (New York: Dutton, 1969); Vla- dimir Markov, Russian Futurism: A History (Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1968); Gian Battista Nazzaro, Introduzione al futurismo (Napoli: Guida Editori, 1973); A. M. Ripellino, Majakovskij e il teatro russo d'avanguardia (Torino: Einaudi, 1959); Henning Rischbieter, ed., Art and the Stage in the 20th Century (Greenwich, Conn.: New York Graphic Society, 1969); Jane Rye, Futurism (London: Studio Vista, 1972); Marc Slo- nim, Russian Theater From the Empire to the Soviets (Cleveland: World Publishing, 1961); Caroline Tisdall and Angelo Bozzolla, Futurism (New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1978); Mario Verdone, Che cosa e il futurismo (Roma: Ubaldini Editore, 1970); idem, ed., Teatro italiano d avanguardia (Roma: Officina Edizioni, 1970). 4. Germano Celant, "Futurism as Mass Avant-Garde," in Anne d'Harnoncourt, ed., H'uturisrn and the International Avant-Garde (Philadelphia: Philadelphia Museum of Art, 1980), p. 36. 5. An obvious example of the Futurist abasement of art is Maiakovskii's work as a cartoonist for the ROSTA agency.