7. JD Books Futurist Period

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

7. JD Books Futurist Period Book Production of Russian Avant-Garde Books 1912-16 Johanna Drucker A simple question frames this paper: what can we learn by looking at the way Russian avant-garde books were made and thereby exposing some attitudes toward their production in their artist-author-producers? Many (though not all) were collaborative works among artists directly involved in the actual making of the books, and this distinguishes them from books whose production was contracted to printers by publishers. The Russian avant-garde artists are distinguished in this era by their involvement in production as well as a willingness to use a wide range of methods from rubber stamp and office equipment to hand coloring and collage. In his important study, The Look of Russian Literature, Gerald Janecek cites Donald Karshan, who states that in making their books, the Russian Futurist artists often used cheap, thin, brittle, wood pulp, “common paper, deliberately chosen, as an anti- establishment gesture and extension of ideological stance.”1 But what ideological stance? Choices about material properties and graphic codes of the earlier Futurist works inevitably link them to a later revolutionary political agenda and a larger historical narrative. And certainly the typography of LEF (1923) extends stylistic approaches developed among the Futurists—by way of Rodchenko, Lissitzky, and Mayakovsky. But what if we differentiate their style from attitudes toward their production? Looking at the specifics of making causes generalizations about the ideology of these artists difficult to sustain, or to contain in a historical narrative in which cultural radicalism and political activism necessarily align, since every instance is particular, not part of a simple, unified teleological agenda. Small in format and edition size, the Russian Futurist books have an unorthodox freshness that springs from the direct methods of hand work and typographic innovation. These books exhibit considerable variety. Some show more continuity with traditional book publication, such as David Burliuk’s commercially printed A Slap in the Face of Public Taste (1912). Others are more conspicuously experimental such as Pomade (1913), Worldbackwards (1912), or a Game in Hell (1912 and 1914 editions). Letterpress produced work, the ferroconcrete poems of Vasily Kamensky (Tango with Cows, 1914) or the elaborately composed zaum books produced by Ilia Zdanevich in Tiflis, beginning in 1917, offer their own special cases. Artists interested in book production had much to draw on in the first decade of the 20th century. Mass production of books in the previous century had been mechanized, industrialized, and notoriously poor in quality. Wood pulp paper and continuous feed presses, powered by steam in the first part of the century and electricity in the second, allowed for production to expand exponentially. With this expansion came changes in the print trades and higher degrees of specialization among its workers, as well as responses from those who saw themselves as champions of finer quality production. While William Morris and others (rightfully) bemoaned the poor quality of many printed materials, the professional skills of chromolithographers, engravers, type designers, printers, and hand- colorists were exceptionally high—and not only in Europe. The works of Japanese woodblock artists reached a level never surpassed before or after. These tradespersons were supported by significant and substantial markets, and unlike fine artists or 1 gentleman printers they were pushed by the pressures of daily deadlines. At worst, the results were abysmal, at best, skilled professional output. The “industry” of print— commercial production outside the studio or atelier environment of fine art—had strong cultural aspirations. Lithography, invented at the beginning of the 19th century, had become highly popular—the “democratic” art—because of its capacity to produce affordable color multiples for broad consumption. The American firm of Currier and Ives, for instance, produced more than a million individual lithographs (from more than 7,500 titles) between 1834 and 1907, many with eight, ten or more tightly registered print runs on each sheet.2 The successful enterprise became a recognizable “brand” in fine art for the masses produced by highly skilled workers in a thriving culture industry. The medium of lithography, the technology used extensively by the “anti- bourgeois” radical Futurist artists, was a means of production available to them precisely because it had been so commercially viable. Likewise, the cheap wood pulp paper, characterized as “ideological,” was what was affordable and ready at hand. In this period of shortages and economic difficulty, expensive handmade “fine” papers would have been hard to obtain and stigmatized by their deluxe commodity status. Other technological commonplaces, particularly the use of transfer paper, made it possible for Futurist artists to sit down at their own tables, desks, or drawing boards and calligraph their works with immediacy and rapidity. Drawn in litho crayon or pen, these images transferred readily to stone or metal plate. Artists took their hand-drawn sheets to the local lithographer and had them reproduced by skilled laborers in the trade. Few, if any among these artists actually printed their own lithos. None that I know of owned a printing press. Significantly, the line between studio and trade was still distinct. As a fine art medium, and particularly as a means of book production, lithography’s fortunes had risen and fallen since its invention at the beginning of the 19th century. Between 1826 and 1828, Delacroix produced striking lithographic drawings for an edition of Goethe’s Faust. But the planographic method of lithography is not compatible with the relief production used for letterpress text printing. Two separate production processes were required driving up costs, errors, handling, and other overhead in production workflow. In 1875, when Stéphane Mallarmé produced a fine edition of his own translation of Edgar Allen Poe’s The Raven with lithographs by Éduoard Manet, the work sold so badly that most of the edition was remaindered. This is surprising in an era when deluxe volumes of lithographed and chromolithographed visual works—Owen Jones’s Grammar of Ornament is a striking example—commanded high prices often supported by eager subscribers. The only efficient and effective way to use lithography for book production is to put the text and images onto the same plate. The Futurists’ aesthetic goal of immediacy was accomplished with the pre- existing ease of industrial print production. The marks of spontaneity, authentic artistic gestures, that are so anti-industrial in their look, and so intimately related to the touch and lyrical spirit of the artist, are, perhaps paradoxically, easy to reproduce through commercial, industrial technology. Spontaneity of direct expression on paper was affordable. The aesthetic impulse of brash informality lowered costs of production. The do-it-mostly-yourself approach distributed labor over a number of different operations: drawing/design, contract with trade printers, table-top glue pot and scissors, and finally, distribution by the artists. The books are made outside the official or institutional 2 channels of mainstream publication, thus suggesting a circumvention of its rules and decorum. The look of handwritten text communicates an “anti-establishment” stance. The drawings in Pomade, for instance, read as attacks on realism, symbolism, aestheticism, impressionism, classicism and above all academic art. But the production means being used are common, industrial, and fully integrated into daily bourgeois life and commerce. The appropriation of commercial production means can be compared to the use of the stylistic devices taken from advertising typography (the pointing hand in Zdanevich’s cover of Terentiev’s Fact) and using it for artistic and poetic projects. These artists are using existing means for their own purposes, but not thinking about restructuring their own relation to the means of production through ownership, changed patterns of training, or artistic identity. This substantively distinguishes them from Rochenko and Lisstizky, to take two artists whose thinking helped define the Constructivist aesthetic in large part through shifts of attitude toward production. Their model of the Constructivist artist overturned the long-held distinction of artist and trade craftsperson or professional that was part of the mythology of industrial capitalism. When VkhUTEMAS, the Russian State Art and Technical School was founded in Moscow in 1920, industrial and art faculty taught together in a merger of what had been a school of fine arts: the Moscow School of Painting, Sculpture, and Architecture, and the Stroganov School of Applied Arts. At VkhUTEMAS, a printing press operated from 1922 onward, and Lissitzky, whose 1927 poster for architecture is a carefully thought through contemporary rework of an ancient sign of printers and masons, was among the visionaries reimagining the curriculum and training of a new model of artist-engineer. In that context, control of and engagement with the means of industrial production was an essential tenet of belief and practice.3 Among Soviet artists a deep schism erupted between those who wanted to show or prescribe new constructs and those committed to enacting them. Taking up the tools to reformulate the new Soviet ideology was a different task from criticizing the old
Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Information For
    1 2 Supplementary Information for 3 Dissecting landscape art history with information theory 4 Byunghwee Lee, Min Kyung Seo, Daniel Kim, In-seob Shin, Maximilian Schich, Hawoong Jeong, Seung Kee Han 5 Hawoong Jeong 6 E-mail:[email protected] 7 Seung Kee Han 8 E-mail:[email protected] 9 This PDF file includes: 10 Supplementary text 11 Figs. S1 to S20 12 Tables S1 to S2 13 References for SI reference citations www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2011927117 Byunghwee Lee, Min Kyung Seo, Daniel Kim, In-seob Shin, Maximilian Schich, Hawoong Jeong, Seung Kee Han 1 of 28 14 Supporting Information Text 15 I. Datasets 16 A. Data curation. Digital scans of landscape paintings were collected from the two major online sources: Wiki Art (WA) (1) 17 and the Web Gallery of Art (WGA) (2). For our purpose, we collected 12,431 landscape paintings by 1,071 artists assigned to 18 61 nationalities from WA, and 3,610 landscape paintings by 816 artists assigned with 20 nationalities from WGA. While the 19 overall number of paintings from WGA is relatively smaller than from WA, the WGA dataset has a larger volume of paintings 20 produced before 1800 CE. Therefore, we utilize both datasets in a complementary way. 21 As same paintings can be included in both datasets, we carefully constructed a unified dataset by filtering out the duplicate 22 paintings from both datasets by using meta-information of paintings (title, painter, completion date, etc.) to construct a unified 23 set of painting images. The filtering process is as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubism (Surface—Plane), 1912
    perished because of a negative and exclusive solution to the question of shading. Our age is obliged by force of circumstances to finish what our predeces- sors passed on to us. The path of search in this direction is broad, its bends are diverse, its forks numerous; the solutions will be many. Among them, those connected in our art with the name of A. Exter will remain as an ex- ample of courage, freedom, and subtlety. The upsurge of strength and courage in the plastic arts wanes neither beyond the Rhine nor at home, and it is expressed in the high level of pure painting unprecedented in our coun- try, a phenomenon that is characteristic of its contemporary state. DAVID BURLIUK Cubism (Surface—Plane), 1912 For biography see p. 8. The text of this piece, "Kubizm," is from an anthology of poems, prose pieces, and articles, Poshchechina obshchestvennomu vkusu [A Slap in the Face of Public Taste] (Moscow, December 1912 [according to bibl. R350, p. 17, although January 1913, according to KL], pp. 95-101 [bibl. R275]. The collection was prefaced by the famous declaration of the same name signed by David Burliuk, Velimir Khlebni- kov, Aleksei Kruchenykh, and Vladimir Mayakovsky and dated December 1912. The volume also contained a second essay by David Burliuk on texture [bibl. R269], verse by Khlebnikov and Benedikt Livshits, and four prose sketches by Vasilii Kan- dinsky [for further details see bibl. 133, pp. 45-50]. Both the essay on cubism and the one on texture were signed by N. Burliuk, although it is obvious that both were written by David and not by Nikolai (David's youngest brother and a poet of some merit).
    [Show full text]
  • The Futurist Moment : Avant-Garde, Avant Guerre, and the Language of Rupture
    MARJORIE PERLOFF Avant-Garde, Avant Guerre, and the Language of Rupture THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS CHICAGO AND LONDON FUTURIST Marjorie Perloff is professor of English and comparative literature at Stanford University. She is the author of many articles and books, including The Dance of the Intellect: Studies in the Poetry of the Pound Tradition and The Poetics of Indeterminacy: Rimbaud to Cage. Published with the assistance of the J. Paul Getty Trust Permission to quote from the following sources is gratefully acknowledged: Ezra Pound, Personae. Copyright 1926 by Ezra Pound. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. Ezra Pound, Collected Early Poems. Copyright 1976 by the Trustees of the Ezra Pound Literary Property Trust. All rights reserved. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. Ezra Pound, The Cantos of Ezra Pound. Copyright 1934, 1948, 1956 by Ezra Pound. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. Blaise Cendrars, Selected Writings. Copyright 1962, 1966 by Walter Albert. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 1986 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 1986 Printed in the United States of America 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 54321 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Perloff, Marjorie. The futurist moment. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Futurism. 2. Arts, Modern—20th century. I. Title. NX600.F8P46 1986 700'. 94 86-3147 ISBN 0-226-65731-0 For DAVID ANTIN CONTENTS List of Illustrations ix Abbreviations xiii Preface xvii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Art 1
    RUSSIAN ART 1 RUSSIAN ART Christie’s dominated the global market for Russian Works of Art and Fabergé in 2016, with our Russian Art sales achieving more than £12 million internationally. For the tenth consecutive season, our Russian Art auctions saw the highest sell-through rates in the market. With a focus on outstanding quality, Christie’s continues to attract both emerging and established collectors in the field. For over a decade, Christie’s has set world auction records in every Russian Art sale. We have broken a total of six records in the past two years, including two in excess of £4 million. Christie’s has set world records for over 50 of Russia’s foremost artists, including Goncharova, Repin, Levitan, Vereshchagin, Vasnetsov, Borovikovsky, Serov, Somov, Lentulov, Mashkov, Annenkov and Tchelitchew. Six of the 10 most valuable paintings ever purchased in a Russian Art sale were sold at Christie’s. Christie’s remains the global market leader in the field of Russian Works of Art and Fabergé, consistently achieving the highest percentage sold by both value and lot for Russian Works of Art. Christie’s closes 2016 with a 60% share of the global Fabergé market, and a 62% share of the global market for Russian Works of Art. cover PROPERTY FROM AN IMPORTANT EUROPEAN COLLECTION KONSTANTIN KOROVIN (1861–1939) Woodland brook, 1921 Estimate: £120,000–150,000 Sold for: £317,000 London, King Street · November 2016 back cover PROPERTY OF A MIDDLE EASTERN COLLECTOR A GEM-SET PARCEL-GILT SILVER-MOUNTED CERAMIC TOBACCO HUMIDOR The mounts marked K.
    [Show full text]
  • The T Ransrational Poetry of Russian Futurism Gerald J Ara,Tek
    The T ransrational Poetry of Russian Futurism E Gerald J ara,tek ' 1996 SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSilY PRESS Calexico Mexicali Tijuana San Diego Copyright © 1996 by San Diego State University Press First published in 1996 by San Diego State University Press, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, California 92182-8141 http:/fwww-rohan.sdsu.edu/ dept/ press/ All rights reserved. -', Except for brief passages quoted in a review, no part of thisb ook m b ay e reproduced in an form, by photostat, microfilm, xerography r y , o any other means, or incorporated into any information retrieval system, electronic or mechanical, withoutthe written permission of thecop yright owners. Set in Book Antiqua Design by Harry Polkinhorn, Bill Nericcio and Lorenzo Antonio Nericcio ISBN 1-879691-41-8 Thanks to Christine Taylor for editorial production assistance 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Acknowledgements Research for this book was supported in large part by grants in 1983, 1986, and 1989 from the International Research & Ex­ changes Board (IREX), with funds provided by the National En­ dowment for the Humanities, the United States Information Agency, and the US Department of State, which administers the Russian, Eurasian, and East European Research Program (Title VIII). In addition, I would like to express my gratitude to the fol­ lowing institutions and their staffs for aid essential in complet­ ing this project: the Fulbright-Bayes Senior Scholar Research Program for further support for the trips in 1983 and 1989, the American Council of Learned Societies for further support for the trip in 1986, the Russian Academy of Sciences, and the Brit­ ish Library; iri Moscow: to the Russian State Library, the Rus­ sian State Archive of Literature and Art, the Gorky Institute of World Literature, the State Literary Museum, and the Mayakovsky Museum; in St.
    [Show full text]
  • F1y3x SECTION XVI MACHINERY and MECHANICAL APPLIANCES
    )&f1y3X SECTION XVI MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL APPLIANCES; ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT; PARTS THEREOF; SOUND RECORDERS AND REPRODUCERS, TELEVISION IMAGE AND SOUND RECORDERS AND REPRODUCERS, AND PARTS AND ACCESSORIES OF SUCH ARTICLES XVI-1 Notes 1. This section does not cover: (a) Transmission, conveyor or elevator belts or belting, of plastics of chapter 39, or of vulcanized rubber (heading 4010); or other articles of a kind used in machinery or mechanical or electrical appliances or for other technical uses, of vulcanized rubber other than hard rubber (heading 4016); (b) Articles of leather or of composition leather (heading 4204) or of furskin (heading 4303), of a kind used in machinery or mechanical appliances or for other technical uses; (c) Bobbins, spools, cops, cones, cores, reels or similar supports, of any material (for example, chapter 39, 40, 44 or 48 or section XV); (d) Perforated cards for Jacquard or similar machines (for example, chapter 39 or 48 or section XV); (e) Transmission or conveyor belts of textile material (heading 5910) or other articles of textile material for technical uses (heading 5911); (f) Precious or semiprecious stones (natural, synthetic or reconstructed) of headings 7102 to 7104, or articles wholly of such stones of heading 7116, except unmounted worked sapphires and diamonds for styli (heading 8522); (g) Parts of general use, as defined in note 2 to section XV, of base metal (section XV), or similar goods of plastics (chapter 39); (h) Drill pipe (heading 7304); (ij) Endless belts of metal wire or strip (section XV); (k) Articles of chapter 82 or 83; (l) Articles of section XVII; (m) Articles of chapter 90; (n) Clocks, watches or other articles of chapter 91; (o) Interchangeable tools of heading 8207 or brushes of a kind used as parts of machines (heading 9603); similar interchangeable tools are to be classified according to the constituent material of their working part (for example, in chapter 40, 42, 43, 45 or 59 or heading 6804 or 6909); or (p) Articles of chapter 95.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • American Art New York | November 19, 2019
    American Art New York | November 19, 2019 AMERICAN ART | 39 2 | BONHAMS AMERICAN ART | 3 American Art at Bonhams New York Jennifer Jacobsen Director Aaron Anderson Los Angeles Scot Levitt Vice President Kathy Wong Specialist San Francisco Aaron Bastian Director American Art New York | Tuesday November 19, 2019 at 4pm BONHAMS BIDS INQUIRIES ILLUSTRATIONS 580 Madison Avenue +1 (212) 644 9001 Jennifer Jacobsen Front Cover: Lot 15 New York, New York 10022 +1 (212) 644 9009 fax Director Inside Front Cover: Lots 47 and 48 bonhams.com [email protected] +1 (917) 206 1699 Inside Back Cover: Lot 91 [email protected] Back Cover: Lot 14 PREVIEW To bid via the internet please visit Friday, November 15, 10am - 5pm www.bonhams.com/25246 Aaron Anderson Saturday, November 16, 10am - 5pm +1 (917) 206 1616 Sunday, November 17, 12pm - 5pm Please note that bids should be [email protected] Monday, November 18, 10am - 5pm summited no later than 24hrs prior to the sale. New Bidders must REGISTRATION also provide proof of identity when IMPORTANT NOTICE SALE NUMBER: 25246 submitting bids. Failure to do this Please note that all customers, Lots 1 - 101 may result in your bid not being irrespective of any previous processed. activity with Bonhams, are CATALOG: $35 required to complete the Bidder LIVE ONLINE BIDDING IS Registration Form in advance of AUCTIONEER AVAILABLE FOR THIS SALE the sale. The form can be found Rupert Banner - 1325532-DCA Please email bids.us@bonhams. at the back of every catalogue com with “Live bidding” in the and on our website at www.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubo-Futurism
    Notes Cubo-Futurism Slap in theFace of Public Taste 1 . These two paragraphs are a caustic attack on the Symbolist movement in general, a frequent target of the Futurists, and on two of its representatives in particular: Konstantin Bal'mont (1867-1943), a poetwho enjoyed enormouspopu­ larityin Russia during thefirst decade of this century, was subsequentlyforgo tten, and died as an emigrein Paris;Valerii Briusov(18 73-1924), poetand scholar,leader of the Symbolist movement, editor of the Salles and literary editor of Russum Thought, who after the Revolution joined the Communist party and worked at Narkompros. 2. Leonid Andreev (1871-1919), a writer of short stories and a playwright, started in a realistic vein following Chekhov and Gorkii; later he displayed an interest in metaphysicsand a leaning toward Symbolism. He is at his bestin a few stories written in a realistic manner; his Symbolist works are pretentious and unconvincing. The use of the plural here implies that, in the Futurists' eyes, Andreev is just one of the numerousepigones. 3. Several disparate poets and prose writers are randomly assembled here, which stresses the radical positionof the signatories ofthis manifesto, who reject indiscriminately aU the literaturewritt en before them. The useof the plural, as in the previous paragraphs, is demeaning. Maksim Gorkii (pseud. of Aleksei Pesh­ kov, 1�1936), Aleksandr Kuprin (1870-1938), and Ivan Bunin (1870-1953) are writers of realist orientation, although there are substantial differences in their philosophical outlook, realistic style, and literary value. Bunin was the first Rus­ sianwriter to wina NobelPrize, in 1933.AJeksandr Biok (1880-1921)is possiblythe best, and certainlythe most popular, Symbolist poet.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Court of International Trade Slip Opinions
    U.S. Court of International Trade ◆ Slip Op. 15–130 REBAR TRADE ACTION COALITION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and ICDAS CELIK ENERJI TERSANE VE ULASIM SANAYI, A.S., AND HABAS SINAI VE TIBBI GAZLAR ISTIHSAL ENDUSTRISI A.S., Defendant-Intervenors. Before: R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge Court No. 14–00268 [Remanding negative less-than-fair-value determination on rebar from Turkey.] Dated: Dated: November 23, 2015 Alan H. Price, John R. Shane, Maureen E. Thorson, and Jeffrey O. Frank, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, for plaintiffs. Richard P. Schroeder, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for the defendant. With him on the brief were Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Reginald T. Blades, Jr., Assistant Director. Of Counsel on the brief was David W. Richardson, Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel for Trade En- forcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC. Matthew M. Nolan, Nancy A. Noonan, and Diana Dimitriuc Quaia, Arent Fox LLP, of Washington, DC, for defendant-intervenor Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim, A.S. David J. Simon, Law Office of David L. Simon, of Washington, DC, for defendant- intervenor Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi A.S. OPINION AND ORDER Musgrave, Senior Judge: Domestic industry representatives Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its individual members (plaintiffs or “RTAC”) challenge a number of aspects on the record of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Turkey: Final Negative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructivist Book Design: Shaping the Proletarian Conscience
    Constructivist Book Design: Shaping the Proletarian Conscience We . are satisfied if in our book the lyric and epic Futurist books were unconventionally small, and whether Margit Rowell evolution of our times is given shape. —El Lissitzky1 or not they were made by hand, they deliberately empha- sized a handmade quality. The pages are unevenly cut One of the revelations of this exhibition and its catalogue and assembled. The typed, rubber- or potato-stamped is that the art of the avant-garde book in Russia, in the printing or else the hectographic, or carbon-copied, early decades of this century, was unlike that found any- manuscript letters and ciphers are crude and topsy-turvy where else in the world. Another observation, no less sur- on the page. The figurative illustrations, usually litho- prising, is that the book as it was conceived and pro- graphed in black and white, sometimes hand-colored, duced in the period 1910–19 (in essentially what is show the folk primitivism (in both image and technique) known as the Futurist period) is radically different from of the early lubok, or popular woodblock print, as well as its conception and production in the 1920s, during the other archaic sources,3 and are integrated into and inte- decade of Soviet Constructivism. These books represent gral to, as opposed to separate from, the pages of poetic two political and cultural moments as distinct from one verse. The cheap paper (sometimes wallpaper), collaged another as any in the history of modern Europe. The covers, and stapled spines reinforce the sense of a hand- turning point is of course the years immediately follow- crafted book.
    [Show full text]
  • Chance Operations and Randomizers in Avant-Garde and Electronic Poetry Tying Media to Language
    Chance Operations and Randomizers in Avant-garde and Electronic Poetry Tying Media to Language Jonathan Baillehache Abstract This article explores and compares the use of chance procedures and randomizers in Dada, Surrealism, Russian Futurism, and contemporary electronic poetry. I analyze the role of materiality of media in creating unexpected literary outcomes through a discussion of Freud’s concept of the uncanny and Katherine Hayles’s concept of computation as symptom. The goal of this essay is to compare the literary use of chance operations by historical avant-garde poets (Dadaists, Russian Futurists, and Surrealists) with the use of randomness in electronic lit- erature (specifically in generative poetry). In this essay, randomness and chance are essentially equivalent terms, but reflect different cultural and epistemological contexts. Chance is traditionally associated with art and print literature, such as automatic writing or the cut-up technique, whereas randomness in this essay is associated with computers and electronic litera- ture. Literary uses of chance or randomness are context-bound and reflect different artistic agendas: in the surrealists’ literary technique of automatic writing,1 for instance, randomness is used in order to explore the uncon- scious, whereas in Nanette Wylde’s electronic poem Storyland, randomness is used to explore the ambiguity between human subjects and machines. How do these different contexts of bibliographic publication and protocols . 1 André Breton and Philippe Soupault’s Les Champs Magnétiques, published in France in 1920, is considered one of the first books written with the method of “automatic writing”, or, as Breton puts it, “to blacken paper with a laudable disregard for any literary output” [“noircir du papier avec un louable mépris de ce qui pourrait en sortir littérairement” ].
    [Show full text]