The Role of Power Line Rights-Of-Way As an Alternative Habitat for Declined Mire Butterflies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Role of Power Line Rights-Of-Way As an Alternative Habitat for Declined Mire Butterflies Journal of Environmental Management 92 (2011) 2539e2546 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Environmental Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jenvman The role of power line rights-of-way as an alternative habitat for declined mire butterflies Terhi Lensu a, Atte Komonen a,*, Outi Hiltula a, Jussi Päivinen b, Veli Saari a, Janne S. Kotiaho a,c a Department of Biological and Environmental Science, P.O. Box 35, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland b Metsähallitus, Etelä-Suomen luontopalvelut, PL 36, 40101 Jyväskylä, Finland c Natural History Museum, P.O. Box 35, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland article info abstract Article history: Habitat loss is one of the greatest threats for biodiversity. In Finland, two thirds of natural mires have Received 28 May 2008 been drained for silviculture, which transforms open wetlands into dense forests. However, vegetation Received in revised form management of power line rights-of-way (ROW) maintain the drained mires as open areas. The aim of 29 April 2011 this study was to determine the effect of the power line ROW vegetation management on butterfly Accepted 18 May 2011 abundance, species richness and community structure by comparing the managed power line ROWs to Available online 12 June 2011 unmanaged drained control sites and to natural mires. The species richness or abundance of mire butterflies did not differ between the power line ROWs and natural mires. In contrast, both species Keywords: fl Lepidoptera richness and abundance of butter ies was low on the unmanaged control sites. Tree canopy cover had fl Mires a negative effect on mire butter ies and this is most likely related to changes in microclimate. The results Vegetation management indicate that the active vegetation removal in the power line ROWs maintain alternative habitats for mire ROW butterflies; yet, the power line ROWs cannot substitute the natural mires. Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction and Reinikainen, 2001). Growing tree stock increases evaporation, and consequently the water level subsides even further and the There is increasing evidence that the immediate cause of the microclimate of mires changes (Päivänen and Paavilainen, 1998; worldwide biodiversity loss, the so called ‘sixth extinction crisis’,is Heikkilä et al., 2002). In addition, the gradually increasing over- a combination of anthropogenic disturbance, climate change and shadowing cause further changes to indigenous vegetation of mires habitat loss (Wilson, 1985; Pimm et al., 1995; Chapin III et al., 2000, still decades after drainage (Heikkilä et al., 2002). Thomas C. et al., 2004, Thomas J.A. et al., 2004). Of these, the most The 2010 Red List of Finnish Species identifies 420 species that important and immediate threat is likely to be the habitat loss: are primarily or secondarily dependent on mires (Rassi et al., 2010). human landuse has already transformed nearly 50% of natural Of the red-listed species that are primarily dependent on mires, biotopes worldwide (Fischer et al., 2007). One biotope that has Lepidoptera is the largest group. Of the c. 100 butterfly species that been heavily affected by landuse is the peatlands. In Europe c. 60% are regularly found in Finland many occur in wetlands, but only 9 of of the area of all peatlands has been transformed: 50% of these for these are specialised to live on mires (Marttila, 2005)(Table 1). the agriculture, 30% for silviculture and 10% for peat industry Throughout southern Finland, mire butterflies have declined (Vasander et al., 2003). In Finland, the percentage is even greater during the past two decades, and in places they have been driven to totalling c. two thirds of the original peatland area (Aapala and local extinction (Kontiokari, 1999; Marttila, 2005; Rassi et al., 2010). Lappalainen, 1998; Vasander, 1998; Virkkala et al., 2000; Heikkilä Mire butterflies are highly specialised on mire habitats and they are et al., 2002). seldom found from other kinds of biotopes. It has been argued that Peatlands are drained for silvicultural purposes. As a conse- mire butterflies have suffered especially from the changes of quence of drainage, subsidence of water level leads to changes in microclimate that result from drainage (Pöyry, 2001), and from the vegetation: characteristic mire vegetation declines, tree growth decline of the larval food plants due to increasing overshadowing of increases, and eventually open land area expires (Vanha-Majamaa the tree canopy (de Becker et al., 1991; Aapala and Lappalainen, 1998; Pöyry, 2001). A few studies have examined the effects of drainage on mire fl * Corresponding author. Tel.: þ358 (0) 14 260 2471. butter ies in more detail. Pöyry (2001) suggested that some E-mail address: atte.komonen@jyu.fi (A. Komonen). species, such as Pyrgus centaureae, Boloria freija, Boloria frigga and 0301-4797/$ e see front matter Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.019 2540 T. Lensu et al. / Journal of Environmental Management 92 (2011) 2539e2546 Table 1 Mire butterflies of this study. Mire species ¼ species dependent on mire; other species ¼ may occur on mire, but is not dependent on mire (based on Marttila, 2005). Butterfly/Scientific name Butterfly/Common name Host plant/Scientific name Host plant/Common name Pyrgus centaureae Northern grizzled skipper Rubus chamaemorus Cloudberry Colias palaeno Arctic sulphur Vaccinium myrtillus, Vaccinium uliginosum Bilberry, Bog bilberry Boloria eunomia Bog fritillary Andromera polifolia, Vaccinium uliginosum Bog rosemary, Bog bilberry Boloria freija Zig-zag fritillary Rubus chamaemorus, Vaccinium uliginosum Cloudberry, Bog bilberry Boloria frigga Willow-bog fritillary Rubus chamaemorus Cloudberry Boloria aquilonaris Cranberry fritillary Vaccinium oxycoccos, Andromeda polifolia Small cranberry, Bog rosemary Coenonympha tullia Large heath Carex sp. Sedges Erebia embla Lapland ringlet Carex sp., Poaceae sp. Sedges, grasses Oeneis jutta Baltic grayling Carex sp., Poaceae sp. Sedges, grasses Erebia embla, will disappear soon after drainage, whereas Boloria from that of traditional grasslands. Studies carried out by Kyläkorpi eunomia survives until the drained mire turns into peat heath. and Grusell (2001) show that also in Sweden several grassland Kontiokari (1999) determined the changes in butterfly communi- butterfly species have been observed to utilise power line ROWs. In ties of two drained mires in South-Ostrobothnia over twenty years fact, in some areas power line ROWs are vitally important alterna- and concluded that the populations of most mire species decreased tive habitat for populations of Euphydryas aurinia (Kyläkorpi and strongly or disappeared completely. Similar conclusions about the Grusell, 2001), a species enshrined by EU habitat directive. decline of mire butterflies following drainage were also reached Our aim in this study is to determine whether declining mire by Pöyry (2001) and Uusitalo et al. (2006). The conclusion from butterflies use power line ROWs as an alternative habitat. This was these studies is that drainage is a serious threat to specialist mire achieved by comparing the abundance, species richness and butterflies. community structure of butterflies on power line ROWs to the ones Over 20 m wide power line rights-of-ways (ROW) cover almost at unmanaged drained mire control sites and at natural mires. 500 km2 in Finland (A. Levula, personal communication). In general, the construction and maintenance of power line ROWs 2. Materials and methods have negative ecological effects such as fragmentation of contin- uous forest habitats (Rich et al., 1994; Nellemann et al., 2001, 2003; 2.1. Study sites Vistnes et al., 2004) and related edge effects, which favour habitat generalist species at the expense of forest interior species (Rich This comparative study was carried out during 2004 and 2006. et al., 1994). Power line ROWs may also filter animal movement Study sites were located in Central Finland (62 C, 26 E) in middle (Willey and Marion, 1980; Doucet and Brown, 1997; Vistnes et al., boreal vegetation zone. The 220 kV power line ROW is 65 m wide and 2004), cause bird mortality due to collisions with overhead wires runs about 70 km from south to north from Uurainen to Karstula. (e.g. Henderson et al., 1996; Bevanger, 1998; Bevanger and Brøseth, We established butterfly monitoring transects on habitats that 2004), and expose species to electromagnetic fields (e.g. Fernie and had experienced three different management regimes: drained Bird, 1999; Fernie et al., 2000). However, vegetation management mires with vegetation management (on power line ROWs) (n ¼ 15), on power line ROWs is essential to ensure secure and uninterrupted drained mires without the management (adjacent to power line transfer of electricity. Corridors are maintained by mechanical ROWs) (n ¼ 15), and natural mires without drainage or manage- cutting on an average of six year rotation. Clearing of vegetation ment (adjacent to or near power line ROWs) (n ¼ 5) (Fig.1). Number maintains open, mainly treeless areas in various successional stages of natural mires we could find from the area adjacent to or near the (Vuorinen, 2001). Evaporation and shading decrease, while mois- power line ROWs was only 5 and this reflects the fact that nearly all ture, light intensity and openness increase, which may to some mires are effectively drained in the study area. extent counterbalance the effect of drainage on mire microclimate. On each of the drained mires we established two transects: one Thus, the creation of open habitat on power line ROWs may be on the power line ROW and another on c. 70 m outside the power beneficial to species that thrive in early successional habitats (e.g. Confer and Pascoe, 2003; Askins, 1994; Lanham and Nichols, 2002; Yahner et al., 2001; Smallidge et al., 1996). Some studies indicate that ROWs can serve as an alternative habitat for threatened plant, grassland butterfly and bee species (de Becker et al., 1991; Smallidge et al., 1996; Piirainen, 1997; Sheridan et al., 1997; Kyläkorpi and Grusell, 2001; Kuussaari et al., 2003; Forrester et al., 2005; Russel et al., 2005).
Recommended publications
  • Yield Variations of Some Common Wild Berries in Finland in 1956–1996
    Ann. Bot. Fennici 36: 299–314 ISSN 0003-3847 Helsinki 14 December 1999 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 1999 Yield variations of some common wild berries in Finland in 1956–1996 Tuomo H. Wallenius Wallenius, T. H., Department of Ecology and Systematics, P.O. Box 47, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland Received 22 January 1999, accepted 6 September 1999 Wallenius, T. H. 1999: Yield variations of some common wild berries in Finland in 1956–1996. — Ann. Bot. Fennici 36: 299–314. Estimates of some of the most common wild berry abundances and changes in their yields compared with the previous year were made in 1956–1996 as a part of the annual autumn game inquiries. The berries included in the inquiry were bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.), cowberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.), cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus L.), both cranberry species (Vaccinium oxycoccos L. and V. microcarpum (Rupr.) Schmalh.), crowberry (Empetrum nigrum L.), rowan (Sorbus aucuparius L.), and wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca L.). On average, 500 observers throughout the country participated annually in the inquiry. Despite the subjective nature of the berry yield estimates, the results are valid for assessing annual changes in the yields of the most common wild berries as well as in long-term trends. The results are coincident with berry researchers’ observations that the yields of cloudberry and wild strawberry have declined during the last decades. The significant (p < 0.01) positive correlations be- tween the yields of the different berry species indicate that meteorological factors influ- ence yields of most berry species in a similar way.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Animal Species of Concern
    MONTANA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM Animal Species of Concern Species List Last Updated 08/05/2010 219 Species of Concern 86 Potential Species of Concern All Records (no filtering) A program of the University of Montana and Natural Resource Information Systems, Montana State Library Introduction The Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) serves as the state's information source for animals, plants, and plant communities with a focus on species and communities that are rare, threatened, and/or have declining trends and as a result are at risk or potentially at risk of extirpation in Montana. This report on Montana Animal Species of Concern is produced jointly by the Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP). Montana Animal Species of Concern are native Montana animals that are considered to be "at risk" due to declining population trends, threats to their habitats, and/or restricted distribution. Also included in this report are Potential Animal Species of Concern -- animals for which current, often limited, information suggests potential vulnerability or for which additional data are needed before an accurate status assessment can be made. Over the last 200 years, 5 species with historic breeding ranges in Montana have been extirpated from the state; Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido), Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius), Pilose Crayfish (Pacifastacus gambelii), and Rocky Mountain Locust (Melanoplus spretus). Designation as a Montana Animal Species of Concern or Potential Animal Species of Concern is not a statutory or regulatory classification. Instead, these designations provide a basis for resource managers and decision-makers to make proactive decisions regarding species conservation and data collection priorities in order to avoid additional extirpations.
    [Show full text]
  • Week Five: Indigenous Food Focus Salmonberry/Cloudberry Day!!
    Farm to School Month – Week Five: Indigenous Food Focus Salmonberry/Cloudberry Day!! Many thanks go out to Melissa Chlupach, Regional Healthcare Dietitian with NANA Management Services, for all her help with all the information she has provided me for each Wednesday this month celebrating Indigenous Foods We Eat! All information I have listed below is based on the materials she has passed along. Thank you, Melissa!! SALMONBERRY/CLOUDBERRY Let’s learn about salmonberries and cloudberries today!! Why take a whole day to look at these two berries? Well, whether you are in Southcentral, the Kenai, or the Southeast Alaska and pick high bush salmonberries or live in Northern or Western Alaska and pick low bush salmonberries (cloudberries), you know how healthy and delicious these little berries can be!! The Roots of Salmonberry/Cloudberry History • Both of these berries are members of the rose (Rosaceae) family and one or the other is found all around Alaska. • Even though the some of the colors and shape of these berries are similar and they are in the same family, these two berries grow and taste very different. • All Alaska wild berries, have high levels of antioxidants. Antioxidants are a group of physiologically active compounds that work to neutralize free radicals (molecules with unpaired electrons). • Historical references document early use of cloudberries to prevent and treat scurvy as well as the medicinal use of the roots and leaves of the plant. • Both berries are considered an important food of the Alaska Native people as sources rich in vitamins A and C. Let’s Move into the Science of Salmonberries and Cloudberries Pronunciation: ˈsæmənˌbɛri and klaʊd ˌbɛri Yup’ik name: atsalugpiaq Iñupiaq name: aqpik Sugt’stun name: alagnaq aqagwik Unangam Tunuu name: alagnan algnan Tlingit name: was’x’aan tléigu néx’w Family: Rosaceae (both) Genus: Rubus (both) Species: R.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon Butterflies a Guide to Yukon Butterflies
    Wildlife Viewing Yukon butterflies A guide to Yukon butterflies Where to find them Currently, about 91 species of butterflies, representing five families, are known from Yukon, but scientists expect to discover more. Finding butterflies in Yukon is easy. Just look in any natural, open area on a warm, sunny day. Two excellent butterfly viewing spots are Keno Hill and the Blackstone Uplands. Pick up Yukon’s Wildlife Viewing Guide to find these and other wildlife viewing hotspots. Visitors follow an old mining road Viewing tips to explore the alpine on top of Keno Hill. This booklet will help you view and identify some of the more common butterflies, and a few distinctive but less common species. Additional species are mentioned but not illustrated. In some cases, © Government of Yukon 2019 you will need a detailed book, such as , ISBN 978-1-55362-862-2 The Butterflies of Canada to identify the exact species that you have seen. All photos by Crispin Guppy except as follows: In the Alpine (p.ii) Some Yukon butterflies, by Ryan Agar; Cerisy’s Sphynx moth (p.2) by Sara Nielsen; Anicia such as the large swallowtails, Checkerspot (p.2) by Bruce Bennett; swallowtails (p.3) by Bruce are bright to advertise their Bennett; Freija Fritillary (p.12) by Sonja Stange; Gallium Sphinx presence to mates. Others are caterpillar (p.19) by William Kleeden (www.yukonexplorer.com); coloured in dull earth tones Butterfly hike at Keno (p.21) by Peter Long; Alpine Interpretive that allow them to hide from bird Centre (p.22) by Bruce Bennett.
    [Show full text]
  • Boloria Frigga Saga (Frigga Fritillary)
    Maine 2015 Wildlife Action Plan Revision Report Date: January 13, 2016 Boloria frigga saga (Frigga Fritillary) Priority 1 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Class: Insecta (Insects) Order: Lepidoptera (Butterflies, Skippers, And Moths) Family: Nymphalidae (Brushfooted Butterflies) General comments: proposed endangered 2014; only 1 known population; restricted to northern Maine and habitat specialized but still partially un- surveyed; absent at several seemingly appropriate locales Species Conservation Range Maps for Frigga Fritillary: Town Map: Boloria frigga saga_Towns.pdf Subwatershed Map: Boloria frigga saga_HUC12.pdf SGCN Priority Ranking - Designation Criteria: Risk of Extirpation: Maine Status: Endangered State Special Concern or NMFS Species of Concern: NA Recent Significant Declines: NA Regional Endemic: NA High Regional Conservation Priority: NA High Climate Change Vulnerability: Vulnerability: 3, Confidence: Medium, Reviewers: Decided in Workshop (W) Understudied rare taxa: Recently documented or poorly surveyed rare species for which risk of extirpation is potentially high (e.g. few known occurrences) but insufficient data exist to conclusively assess distribution and status. *criteria only qualifies for Priority 3 level SGCN* Notes: proposed endangered 2014; only 1 known population; restricted to northern Maine and habitat specialized but still relatively un-surveyed; absent at several seemingly appropriate locales Historical: NA Culturally Significant: NA Professional Discretion: Current criteria ranked Boloria frigga
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging in Boreal Forest: Wild Food Plants of the Republic of Karelia, NW Russia
    foods Article Foraging in Boreal Forest: Wild Food Plants of the Republic of Karelia, NW Russia Valeria Kolosova 1,2, Olga Belichenko 1,* , Alexandra Rodionova 3 , Denis Melnikov 4 and Renata Sõukand 1,* 1 Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Via Torino 155, 30172 Venice, Italy; [email protected] 2 Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tuchkov pereulok 9, 199004 St Petersburg, Russia 3 Institute of Linguistics, Literature and History of the Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushkinskaya St. 11, 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia; [email protected] 4 Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor Popov St. 2, 197376 St Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (O.B.); [email protected] (R.S.) Received: 4 July 2020; Accepted: 27 July 2020; Published: 29 July 2020 Abstract: While the current consumption of wild food plants in the taiga of the American continent is a relatively well-researched phenomenon, the European taiga area is heavily underrepresented in the scientific literature. The region is important due to its distinctive ecological conditions with restricted seasonal availability of wild plants. During an ethnobotanical field study conducted in 2018–2019, 73 people from ten settlements in the Republic of Karelia were interviewed. In addition, we conducted historical data analysis and ethnographical source analysis. The most widely consumed wild food plants are forest berries (three Vaccinium species, and Rubus chamaemorus), sap-yielding Betula and acidic Rumex. While throughout the lifetime of the interviewees the list of used plants did not change considerably, the ways in which they are processed and stored underwent several stages in function of centrally available goods, people’s welfare, technical progress, and ideas about the harm and benefit of various products and technological processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci
    Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 REGION 10 REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 REGION 6 REGION 8 REGION 9 ALTERNATE NATURESERVE PRIMARY MAJOR SUB- U.S. N U.S. 2005 NATURESERVE SCIENTIFIC NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME(S) COMMON NAME GROUP GROUP G RANK RANK ESA C 9 Anahita punctulata Southeastern Wandering Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G4 NNR 9 Apochthonius indianensis A Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1G2 N1N2 9 Apochthonius paucispinosus Dry Fork Valley Cave Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 Pseudoscorpion 9 Erebomaster flavescens A Cave Obligate Harvestman Invertebrate Arachnid G3G4 N3N4 9 Hesperochernes mirabilis Cave Psuedoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G5 N5 8 Hypochilus coylei A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G3? NNR 8 Hypochilus sheari A Lampshade Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 NNR 9 Kleptochthonius griseomanus An Indiana Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Kleptochthonius orpheus Orpheus Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 9 Kleptochthonius packardi A Cave Obligate Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 N2N3 9 Nesticus carteri A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid GNR NNR 8 Nesticus cooperi Lost Nantahala Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Nesticus crosbyi A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1? NNR 8 Nesticus mimus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2 NNR 8 Nesticus sheari A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 8 Nesticus silvanus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnoecology and Reproductive Ecology of Bakeapple (Rubus Chamaemorus L., Rosaceae) in Southern Labrador
    The ethnoecology and reproductive ecology of bakeapple (Rubus chamaemorus L., Rosaceae) in southern Labrador Amanda Karst B.Sc., University of Regina, 2002 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in the Department of Biology O Amanda Karst, 2005 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy of other means, without the permission of the author Co-supervisors Dr. Nancy J. Turner and Dr. Gerry Allen ABSTRACT Bakeapple (Rubus chamaemovus L.; Rosaceae) is a circumpolar herbaceous perennial typically found in peat bogs. Bakeapple fruits have served as a vital food - resource for many northern peoples including those of the Subarctic and Arctic areas of North America. Although the reproductive ecology and habitat requirements of this plant have been studied extensively in Scandinavia, there has been scant research on bakeapple populations in Canada. Furthermore, there has been little documentation of its use or ethnoecology in many parts of Canada, especially in Newfoundland and Labrador. For this research I worked in the predominantly Metis community of Charlottetown, Labrador, where there has been a long tradition of bakeapple use. My objectives were to: 1. Document traditional use and major changes in use of bakeapple by this community; 2. Determine the most important factors influencing fruit production in local bakeapple populations; and 3. Link community observations on the ecology of this species with previous research and ecological data from my study in the area. To examine traditional use and knowledge of bakeapple in the community of Charlottetown, I conducted semi-directed in-depth interviews with knowledgeable bakeapple pickers in the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Cairngorms Wild Plants Keys Mountains
    Unlock the outdoors Cairngorms wild plants keys Mountains An outdoor learning resource for group leaders KEYS to Cairngorms mountains Key The language of the Cairngorms 1 Gaelic and Scots words for plants and places Key Lines on the landscape 2 Poems and prose to inspire us Key The shaping of our mountains 3 Cairngorms geology and erosion Key Natural treelines 4 In search of ‘krummholz’ Key Patterns in the heather moors 5 Red grouse and the landscape of muirburn Key Blanket bogs 6 Sphagnum mosses and peat hags Key A splash of spring green 7 Spring lines and flushes Key Life in the snow and ice 8 Explore the arctic alpine world of Scotland Key What’s that plant? 9 Spotter guides with handy plant ID tips Cairngorms mountains keys | Contents Unlocking Cairngorms mountains How to use the KEYS Each KEY includes an ‘Idea’ and short ‘Activity’, with a ‘Discussion’ The KEYS explore different section to take things further. You aspects of Cairngorms mountain don’t need to know the answers to habitats and wildlife and are a the questions, they are prompts to learning resource for leaders. stimulate thought and discussion. Whether hill walking, climbing Have fun with them. Choose KEYS or wildlife watching, there will to suit your group. Fit the KEYS into be something in the KEYS for short stops or lunch breaks with you to help enrich your group’s your group. Or take more time and experience of this amazing habitat. unlock more of the Cairngorms. ©Gwenda Diack Cairngorms mountains keys | Introduction Cairngorms mountains Important Plant Areas are the fascinating flora which is one most important places in the of the reasons why Plantlife world for wild plant and fungal identified the Cairngorms as diversity that can be protected an Important Plant Area (IPA).
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Lepidoptera 2003-2004
    Ontario Lepidoptera 2003-2004 Edited and Compiled by Colin D. Jones Toronto Entomologists’ Association Occasional Publication #36-2006 ISBN: 0-921631-29-4 Ontario Lepidoptera 2003-2004 Edited and Compiled by Colin D. Jones August 2006 Published by the Toronto Entomologists’ Association Toronto, Ontario Production by Colin D. Jones TORONTO ENTOMOLOGISTS’ ASSOCIATION ONTARIO LEPIDOPTERA (TEA) Published annually by the Toronto Entomologists’ The TEA is a non-profit educational and scientific Association. organization formed to promote interest in insects, to encourage co-operation among amateur and professional Ontario Lepidoptera 2003-2004 entomologists, to educate and inform non-entomologists Publication date: August 2006 about insects, entomology and related fields, to aid in the ISBN: 0-921631-29-4 preservation of insects and their habitats and to issue Copyright © TEA for Authors publications in support of these objectives. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or used without written permission. The TEA is a registered charity (#1069095-21); All donations are tax creditable. Information on submitting records, notes and articles to Ontario Lepidoptera can be obtained by contacting an Membership Information: editor: Annual dues: Colin D. Jones Individual-$25 Editor and compiler of Butterflies and Skippers Student-$15 Box 182 Family-$30 Lakefield, Ontario, Canada K0L 2H0 All membership queries and payment of dues can be Home Tel: (705) 652-5004 directed to Alan J. Hanks, Treasurer, 34 Seaton Drive, Work Tel: (705) 755-2166 Aurora, Ontario, Canada L4G 2K1. Tel: (905) 727-6993. Email: [email protected] or [email protected] email: [email protected] Currently Vacant Publications received as part of a TEA membership Editor and compiler of Moths include: • 3 issues per year of our newsjournal Ontario Insects COVER ILLUSTRATION • annual Ontario Lepidoptera summary • discounts on sales of other publications including Question Mark (Polygonia interrogationis) by Peter Ontario Odonata Burke.
    [Show full text]
  • Värdväxtbyte Hos Myrvisslaren, Pyrgus Centaureae (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae)
    Ent. Tidskr. 133 (2012) Värdväxtbyte hos myrvisslaren, Pyrgus centaureae Värdväxtbyte hos myrvisslaren, Pyrgus centaureae (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) PEr-OlOf Wickman Wickman, P-O.: Värdväxtbyte hos myrvisslaren, Pyrgus centaureae (lepidoptera: Hespe- riidae). [Hostplant shift in the northern grizzled skipper, Pyrgus centaureae (Lepidop- tera: Hesperiidae).] – Entomologisk Tidskrift 133 (3): 93-100. Uppsala, Sverige 2012. iSSn 0013-886x. This study for the first time describes the unusual life cycle of the northern grizzled skip- per, Pyrgus centaureae rambur, 1839, where the larvae shift host plant from dwarf birch, Betula nana, to cloudberry, Rubus chamaemorus. larvae were reared from eggs laid in June by a wild caught female. Eggs hatch after about 10 days in room temperature. The first instar larvae initially prefer leaves of dwarf birch but shift voluntarily to cloudberry leaves after their first moult. The larvae make a tent out of a couple of leaves on dwarf birch. On cloudberry, the tent is made by folding the edge of a leaf. The larvae spend their first winter as second instar larvae in a tent made from a cloudberry leaf. The first instar larva can use cloudberry for feeding, and the second instar larva can use dwarf birch. However, this seems only to occur when the host plant typical for the instar is not available. The cloudberry leaves are shed in the autumn and the tent with the larva spends the winter on the ground. The next summer the larvae complete their development at a size of about 20 mm and pupate above the ground in loosely knitted cocoons. The 13 mm long pupa hibernates.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Site XA232X01Y201 Boreal Woodland Peat Frozen Terraces
    Natural Resources Conservation Service Ecological site XA232X01Y201 Boreal Woodland Peat Frozen Terraces Last updated: 5/11/2020 Accessed: 10/01/2021 General information MLRA notes Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 232X–Yukon Flats Lowlands The Yukon Flats Lowlands MLRA is an expansive basin characterized by numerous levels of flood plains and terraces that are separated by minimal breaks in elevation. This MLRA is in Interior Alaska and is adjacent to the middle reaches of the Yukon River. Numerous tributaries of the Yukon River are within the Yukon Flats Lowlands MLRA. The largest are Beaver Creek, Birch Creek, Black River, Chandalar River, Christian River, Dall River, Hadweenzic River, Hodzana River, Porcupine River, and Sheenjek River. The MLRA has two distinct regions— lowlands and marginal uplands. The lowlands have minimal local relief and are approximately 9,000 square miles in size (Williams 1962). Landforms associated with the lowlands are flood plains and stream terraces. The marginal uplands consist of rolling and dissected plains that are a transitional area between the lowlands and adjacent mountain systems. The marginal uplands are approximately 4,700 square miles in size (Williams 1962). This MLRA is bounded by the Yukon-Tanana Plateau to the south, Hodzana Highlands to the west, Porcupine Plateau to the east, and southern foothills of the Brooks Range to the north (Williams 1962). These surrounding hills and mountains partially isolate the Yukon Flats Lowlands MLRA from weather systems affecting other MLRAs of Interior Alaska. As a result, temperatures are generally warmer in summer and colder in winter than is characteristic in other areas at comparable latitude.
    [Show full text]