DOCSLIB.ORG

Visitation Numbers 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Visitation Numbers 2020 Metsähallitus, Parks & Wildlife Finland The Visitation Numbers in 2020 of National Parks, National Hiking Areas and Other Protected and Hiking Areas of Recreational Importance. All Areas Managed by Metsähallitus. Source: the ASTA Visitor Information System of Metsähallitus. National Parks Visitation Numbers Archipelago National Park 79,300 Bothnian Bay National Park 5,000 Bothnian Sea National Park 99,300 Ekenäs Archipelago National Park 58,300 Gulf of Finland National Park 17,700 HelvetinjärviNational Park 80,200 Hiidenportti National Park 18,500 Hossa National Park 111,300 Isojärvi National Park 38,300 Kauhaneva–Pohjankangas National Park 29,200 Koli National Park 236,000 Kolovesi National Park 19,900 Kurjenrahka National Park 96,000 Lauhanvuori National Park 22,700 Leivonmäki National Park 37,600 Lemmenjoki National Park 21,700 Liesjärvi National Park 74,200 Linnansaari National Park 34,700 Nuuksio National Park 367,500 Oulanka National Park 235,800 Pallas–Yllästunturi National Park 563,100 Patvinsuo National Park 24,800 Petkeljärvi National Park 32,100 Puurijärvi and Isosuo National Park 19,200 Pyhä-Häkki National Park 28,200 Pyhä–Luosto National Park 204,500 Päijänne National Park 28,900 Repovesi National Park 233,000 Riisitunturi National Park 67,100 Rokua National Park 22,300 Salamajärvi National Park 25,900 Seitseminen National Park 60,800 Sipoonkorpi National Park 204,000 Southern Konnevesi National Park 49,100 Syöte National Park 113,500 Teijo National Park 123,000 Tiilikkajärvi National Park 19,500 Torronsuo National Park 53,600 Urho Kekkonen National Park 372,300 Valkmusa National Park 29,700 Total Number of National Parks 40 Total Number of Visits 3,957,800 National Hiking Areas Visitation Numbers Evo Hiking Area 83,100 Iso-Syöte Hiking Area 68,000 Kylmäluoma Hiking Area 27,500 Oulujärvi Hiking Area 52,700 Ruunaa Hiking Area 85,900 Total Number of Hiking Areas 5 Total Number of Visits 317,200 Cultural Heritage Sites Visitation Numbers Aulanko Nature Reserve 541,800 Auttiköngäs 31,100 Kajaani Castle Ruins 45,300 Kuusisto Bishop´s Castle Ruins 28,500 Langinkoski Nature Reserve 86,300 Rapola Hill Fort 36,600 Raseborg Castle Ruin 50,600 Svartholma Sea Fortress 21,000 Vallisaari 39,000 Total Number of Cultural Heritage Sites 9 Total Number of Visits 880,200 Other Areas Visitation Numbers Arctic Circle Hiking Area 103,600 Bothnian Bay Islands 8,100 Dagmar park 24,600 Espoonlahti Nature Reserve 27,800 Friendship Park 21,600 Hailuoto 20,000 Hammastunturi Wilderness Area 22,000 Hepoköngäs 30,200 Hämeenkangas 62,700 Imatra Crown Park 111,700 Inari Hiking Area 120,000 Julmatlammit 8,500 Kaihuanvaara–Kivalo 5,500 Kalevala Park 5,300 Kanavuori 6,000 Karkali Strict Nature Reserve 12,600 Kilpisjärvi–Käsivarsi Area 91,400 Korouoma 30,500 Koskeljärvi and Vaaljärvi 6,300 Kuusistonlahti 4,200 Kvarken Archipelago 95,000 Laajalahti Nature Reserve 116,800 Martimoaapa 15,000 Other Areas Visitation Numbers Meiko 37,300 Mietoistenlahti 6,800 Neitvuori 13,900 Paistjärvi 5,000 Peurajärvi 8,100 Pihlajavesi 38,900 Pinkjärvi 6,100 Punkaharju Nature Reserve and Research Forest 161,300 Rokua Nature Reserve and Recreational Forest 40,000 Ryövärinkuoppa 5,000 Sallatunturi Area 60,900 Saltfjärden and Tavastfjärden 6,400 Seili 18,700 Sevetti–Näätämö 10,000 Siikalahti 12,600 Siikaneva Mire Reserve 15,100 Sompio Strict Nature Reserve 15,000 Syöte Recreational Forest 57,400 Söderskär and Långören Archipelago 4,500 Telkkämäki Nature Reserve 2,000 Tenojoki–Kevo 45,200 Tulliniemi 43,300 Ukkohalla-Paljakka 36,600 Usmi 33,100 Vaarunvuori 5,000 Valtavaara and Pyhävaara Nature Reserve 136,200 Vaskijärvi Strict Nature Reserve 2,000 Vehoniemenharju Nature Reserve 30,400 Vihaslahti 12,500 Total Number of Areas 52 Total Number of Visits 1,818,700 Other Protected and Hiking Areas of Recreational Importance, Estimate Total Number of Visits 1,269,100 All Areas Total Number of Visits 8,243,000.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS in ESKER AQUIFERS from Field Measurements to Fully Integrated Numerical Modelling
    C510etukansi.kesken.fm Page 1 Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:11 PM C 510 OULU 2014 C 510 UNIVERSITY OF OULU P.O.BR[ 00 FI-90014 UNIVERSITY OF OULU FINLAND ACTA UNIVERSITATISUNIVERSITATIS OULUENSISOULUENSIS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS ACTAACTA SERIES EDITORS TECHNICATECHNICACC Pertti Ala-aho ASCIENTIAE RERUM NATURALIUM Pertti Ala-aho Professor Esa Hohtola GROUNDWATER-SURFACE BHUMANIORA WATER INTERACTIONS IN University Lecturer Santeri Palviainen CTECHNICA ESKER AQUIFERS Postdoctoral research fellow Sanna Taskila FROM FIELD MEASUREMENTS TO FULLY DMEDICA INTEGRATED NUMERICAL MODELLING Professor Olli Vuolteenaho ESCIENTIAE RERUM SOCIALIUM University Lecturer Veli-Matti Ulvinen FSCRIPTA ACADEMICA Director Sinikka Eskelinen GOECONOMICA Professor Jari Juga EDITOR IN CHIEF Professor Olli Vuolteenaho PUBLICATIONS EDITOR Publications Editor Kirsti Nurkkala UNIVERSITY OF OULU GRADUATE SCHOOL; UNIVERSITY OF OULU, FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY ISBN 978-952-62-0657-8 (Paperback) ISBN 978-952-62-0658-5 (PDF) ISSN 0355-3213 (Print) ISSN 1796-2226 (Online) ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS C Technica 510 PERTTI ALA-AHO GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS IN ESKER AQUIFERS From field measurements to fully integrated numerical modelling Academic dissertation to be presented with the assent of the Doctoral Training Committee of Technology and Natural Sciences of the University of Oulu for public defence in Auditorium GO101, Linnanmaa, on 9 December 2014, at 12 noon UNIVERSITY OF OULU, OULU 2014 Copyright © 2014 Acta Univ. Oul. C 510, 2014 Supervised by Professor Bjørn Kløve Reviewed by Professor Peter Engesgaard Doctor Jon Paul Jones Opponent Professor Philip Brunner ISBN 978-952-62-0657-8 (Paperback) ISBN 978-952-62-0658-5 (PDF) ISSN 0355-3213 (Printed) ISSN 1796-2226 (Online) Cover Design Raimo Ahonen JUVENES PRINT TAMPERE 2014 Ala-aho, Pertti, Groundwater-surface water interactions in esker aquifers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Horseshoe of Fennoscandia, Norway, Rein Midteng
    The Horseshoe of Fennoscandia-A corridor for the long term survival of old-growth forest dependent species in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Rein Midteng, Asplan Viak. Norway. rein.midteng@asplanviak.no 1.What is the Horseshoe of Fennoskandia? 2. What is its ecologial function? 3. Which subparts does it consist of? 4.Transboundary zones 5. How continuous and broad is the Horseshoe? 6. Key regions and areas in need of protection 7. Futher emphazis Un-protected old-growth forest in Pasvik 1.What is the Horseshoe of Fennoskandia? • Its a more or less continously corridor of old-growth forests from southern Finland/southeast Karealia to southern Norway/Sweden. • It consists of four subparts that are connected as a whole. These four subparts are although presented individually. In addition, it exists so called transboundary zones, which are “green” corridors with mostly continuously old-growth forests that stretch out from the Horseshoe. • Old-growth forests dominate the Horseshoe while in the rest of Fennoscandia culture forests dominate. • It consist of both protected and unprotected old-growth forests. • It includes a great variation of vegetationzones and foresttypes. • It is of major importance in the implementation of the Nagaya goals • It is of major importance for the preservation of old-growth forest species in Norway, Sweden, Finland and probably also in some parts of Russia. 2. What is its (ecologial) function? • It is a migrationzone east-west (since the last ice age), and the Fennoscandinavian countries share therefore to a large extent the same flora and fauna as Russia (low level of endemism). • It provides an exchange of species, individuals and genes to and forth in the Horseshoe.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development Strategy of the Baltic Sea Cycle Route Copenhagen - Rostock - Gdańsk (2030)
    Sustainable development strategy of the Baltic Sea Cycle Route Copenhagen - Rostock - Gdańsk (2030) Gdańsk, November 2017 r. 1 Zawartość 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Target groups .................................................................................................................................. 6 3. Planned outputs of the document .................................................................................................. 7 4. Baltic Sea Cycle Route - general information .................................................................................. 7 4.1. Denmark .................................................................................................................................. 8 4.2. Germany: Land Schleswig-Holstein ....................................................................................... 10 4.3. Germany: Land Mecklemburg-Vorpommern ........................................................................ 11 4.4. Poland: Zachodniopomorskie Voivodeship ........................................................................... 12 4.5. Poland: Pomorskie Voivodeship ........................................................................................ 1413 4.6. Poland: Warmia and Mazury Voivodeship ............................................................................ 15 4.7. Russia Federation: Kaliningrad District .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting the Number of Visits to National Parks in Finland
    UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Department of Forest Economics Factors affecting the number of visits to National Parks in Finland Master's thesis Forest Economics and Policy Anna Vanhatalo December 2009 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO ⎯ HELSINGFORS UNIVERSITET ⎯ UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI Tiedekunta/Osasto ⎯ Fakultet/Sektion ⎯ Faculty Laitos ⎯ Institution ⎯ Department Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Department of Forest Economics Tekijä ⎯ Författare ⎯ Author Vanhatalo, Anna Maria Työn nimi ⎯ Arbetets titel ⎯ Title Factors affecting the number of visits to national parks in Finland Oppiaine ⎯Läroämne ⎯ Subject Forest Economics and Policy Työn laji ⎯ Arbetets art ⎯ Level Aika ⎯ Datum ⎯ Month and year Sivumäärä ⎯ Sidoantal ⎯ Number of pages Master's thesis December 2009 62 + appendixes Tiivistelmä ⎯ Referat ⎯ Abstract Outdoor recreation and nature-based tourism have increased during the last ten years. In addition, the interest towards national parks has grown, which can be seen also as an increasing trend in the development of the number of visits to national parks. The aim of this thesis is to explain the cross-sectional variation in the visitation data representing different parks and hiking areas. Another aim is to explore the question of why the visitation in national parks has increased in Finland. These questions are studied separately for the national parks and hiking areas, because the development of the number of visits in national parks and hiking areas has been different. In addition, the separation is made also between Southern Finland and Northern Finland due to for example the size differences and close link of the national parks in Northern Finland with the ski-resort centers. Explanatory factors are divided into supply side factors (services inside and outside the park) and demand side factors (economic and demographics factors).
    [Show full text]
  • FINLAND State of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture in Finland
    COUNTRY REPORT ON THE STATE OF PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE FINLAND State of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture in Finland Second Finnish National Report Merja Vetel¨ainen M°arten Huld´en Tuula Pehu (compilers) November 6, 2008 Note by FAO This Country Report has been prepared by the national authorities in the context of the preparatory process for the Second Report on the State of World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. The Report is being made available by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) as requested by the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. However, the report is solely the responsibility of the national authorities. The information in this report has not been verified by FAO, and the opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the views or policy of FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. CONTENTS ABSTRACT 6 INTRODUCTION TO FINLAND AND ITS AGRICULTURAL SECTOR 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis Management in Finnish National Parks
    Out of the Woods: Crisis Management in Finnish National Parks Heidi Painilainen Bachelor’s Thesis Degree Programme in Tourism 2011 Abstract Degree programme in tourism Author or authors Group or year Heidi Painilainen of entry Autumn 2007 Title of report Number of Out of the Woods: Crisis Management in Finnish National pages and Parks appendices 56 + 5 Teacher/s or supervisor/s Eva Holmberg, Annika Konttinen The objective of this thesis was to study the crisis management of Finnish national parks. In practice this involves assessing the possible crises that could actually occur in the national parks, how these could be prevented and, finally, what kinds of tools are used for managing these. The theoretical framework of the study introduces crisis management, life-cycle of crisis and national park management. To get a closer look at the national parks, five case studies of different Finnish national parks were conducted. The chosen nation- al parks include Archipelago National Park, Oulanka National Park, Pallas- Yllästunturi National Park, Patvinsuo National Park and Päijänne National Park. These parks were selected since they represent different locations, sizes, environ- mental features and, therefore, also potential crises. The approach of the study is qualitative and the semi-structured interview was cho- sen as the main method of research. A representative of each selected national park was interviewed individually. The interviews resulted in five 29–55 minute recorded conversations which were subsequently transcribed for the purpose of analysis. The interviews were conducted in February 2011 and four of them were executed by Skype due to the long distances.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Park Management and Its Effectiveness
    8 Park Management and its Effectiveness Sections 8 and 9 of this report will examine the Natural Heritage Services mission and effectiveness of Metsähallitus’s management of vision for 2010 the protected areas under its administration by considering how well objectives have been The mission of the NHS has been defined as achieved, and assessing the benefits obtained follows: through management in relation to the resources – We manage our national parks and other used. The review will largely examine overall out- areas according to best practices based comes in relation to total resource use and moni- on research and experience, to preserve toring records showing how working hours are biodiversity and cultural values. allocated between the core processes that fulfill – We provide our customers with possibili- the main tasks of the Natural Heritage Services ties to enjoy recreation in and learn about (NHS). In relation to tasks especially relevant in nature. reaching goals set by society, there will be a focus – We create opportunities for nature tour- also on cost-effectiveness and productivity. These ism and sustainable regional develop- key tasks assigned to the NHS include: ment. – establishing of protected areas – We collaborate with many partners na- – surveying of natural and cultural values tionally and internationally. – planning of the management and use of – We work to improve our service capacity protected areas and the productivity and effectiveness of – restoring and managing habitats our activities. – providing facilities and services for hikers and other customers. This mission emphasises basic values shared throughout society: nature conservation and eco- This review is based on the concept of adaptive logical, cultural, social and economic sustainabil- planning and management of protected areas and ity in the use of natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar List - page 1/55 The List of Wetlands of International Importance Published 21 October 2020 The Ramsar List was established in response to Article 2.1 of the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971), which reads: “Each Contracting Party shall designate suitable wetlands within its territory for inclusion in a List of Wetlands of International Importance, hereinafter referred to as ‘the List’ which is maintained by the bureau [secretariat of the Convention] established under Article 8.” Wetlands included in the List acquire a new status at the national level and are recognized by the international community as being of significant value not only for the country, or the countries, in which they are located, but for humanity as a whole. The Convention establishes that “wetlands should be selected for the List on account of their international significance in terms of ecology, botany, zoology, limnology or hydrology.” Over the years, the Conference of the Contracting Parties has adopted more specific criteria interpreting the Convention text, as well as an Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands and a Classification system of wetland type. All issues pertaining to the Ramsar List were encapsulated in Resolution VII.11 adopted by the Conference of the Parties in May 1999 and entitled Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance1, which has been frequently updated. Everything in the Strategic Framework is founded upon this “Vision for the Ramsar List”: “To develop and maintain an international network of wetlands which are important for the conservation of global biological diversity and for sustaining human life through the ecological and hydrological functions they perform.” Full data submitted by the Parties for each of their Ramsar Sites, with one-paragraph descriptions of each site, are entered in the Ramsar Sites Information Service (rsis.ramsar.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Tourism Development Strategy for Oulanka National Park 2011
    istio Sari Alatossava Sustainable Tourism Development Strategy for Oulanka National Park 2011 Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja. Sarja C 112 Nature Protection Publications of Metsähallitus. Series C 112 Sari Alatossava Metsähallitus Natural Heritage Services, Ostrobothnia PO Box 26 93601 Kuusamo, Finland sari.alatossava@metsa.fi Translated by Fran Weaver Översättning: Firma Pimma Åhman Cover photo: Oulanka’s suspension bridges lead visitors into a world of unforgettable experiences. Photo: Mylene van der Donk © Metsähallitus 2011 ISSN-L 1796-2943 ISSN 1796-2943 (online) ISBN 978-952-446-916-6 (pdf) Sari Alatossava Sustainable Tourism Development Strategy for Oulanka National Park 2011 DOCUMENTATION PAGE PUBLISHED BY Metsähallitus PUBLICATION DATE 5.8.2011 COMMISSIONED BY Metsähallitus DATE OF APPROVAL 23.2.2011 CONFIDENTIALITY Public REGISTRATION NO. 1504/530/2011 TYPE OF PROTECTED National Park, Natura 2000 Site AREA/CONSERVATION PROGRAMME NAME(S) OF PROTECTED Oulanka National Park AREA(S) NATURA 2000 SITE Oulanka FI1101645 NAME(S) AND CODE(S) REGIONAL UNIT Natural Heritage Services, Ostrobothnia AUTHOR(S) Sari Alatossava TITLE Sustainable Tourism Development Strategy for Oulanka National Park 2011 ABSTRACT Oulanka National Park is located in a region of NE Finland that is important for tourism, midway between the tourism centres of Ruka-Kuusamo and Salla. Thanks to its unique natural features, diverse facilities, and a long history and strong image as a destination for hiking and outdoor activi- ties, the park is popular both in terms of visitor numbers and as a regional tourist attraction. The park welcomes almost 170,000 visitors annually. Visitors’ spending boosted the local economy by an estimated 15 million euros in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Determine the Cadastral Borders by Natural Shapes Instead of Border Marks? Why Not?
    Determine the Cadastral Borders by Natural Shapes Instead of Border Marks? Why Not? Sami MANTERE, Finland Keywords: Cadastre, Lidar, Orthophotos SUMMARY Finnish cadastral system is based to a Nordic variation of German system. Finnish cadaster’s fundamental part is on the border marks placed to the field. The border marks are more relevant than cadastral maps or coordinates when determine the true location of the border although the borders are fixed on cadastral map. Cadastral proceedings can be divided in two sections, the technical part and judicial part. Technical part includes the fieldwork, surveying and marking the border to the field. After the fieldwork the parcel is unambiguous to the new owner. The judicial part includes the cadastral meeting and registration of the proceeding. The accuracy requirements to the border marks are 0.1 m -0.5 m depending the value of the land. These requirements are made by National Land Survey of Finland. Because of huge amount of the inaccurate border marks, accuracy worse than 0.5 m, the proceedings include a visiting to the field in any case. Sending a professional land surveyor to the field is expensive. Sometimes the surveying of the parcel is more expensive than the value of the parcel. To reduce the costs of the field work the author of this paper tested different methods to determine new borders to the field and to cadastral map too. The demarcation of borders were made from orthophotos and lidar -data to the natural shapes such as ditches, roads, vegetation edges etc. The results showed it is possible to determine new borders without going to the field with high accuracy and when using the combination of lidar -data and orthophotos the accuracy would be better.
    [Show full text]
  • Enchanting Arctic Experiences Since 1974
    KAKSLAUTTANEN ARCTIC RESORT – ENCHANTING ARCTIC EXPERIENCES SINCE 1974. Kakslauttanen Arctic Resort Kiilopääntie 9, 99830 Saariselkä, Finland Closest airport: Ivalo (IVL) Open year round (except during May) Take a virtual tour Winter/Spring video – Summer/Autumn video - www.kakslauttanen.fi Follow us Facebook - Instagram - Twitter - Pinterest – YouTube Facebook & Twitter: @kakslauttanen Instagram: @kakslauttanen_arctic_resort #kakslauttanen Image bank http://kakslauttanen.kuvat.fi/kuvat/ password: welcome2lauttanen Thank you for crediting Kakslauttanen Arctic Resort. If possible, please include a link to our website www.kakslauttanen.fi and note that for some images the photographer should be credited too. ENCHANTING ARCTIC EXPERIENCES SINCE 1974 Kakslauttanen Arctic Resort is an enchanting, otherworldly destination located 250 kilometres (150 miles) north of the Arctic Circle in Finnish Lapland, just a four-hour drive from the Arctic Ocean. Since 1974, our family-run hotel has been offering year-round magical experiences in the pristine arctic wilderness. We are world-renowned for our iconic Glass Igloos and the magical Northern Lights – but there are plenty of other arctic secrets to explore. We offer numerous unique excursions – from reindeer and husky adventures to meeting Santa or panning for gold – making any stay truly unforgettable. You will be surrounded by some of the cleanest nature in the world, with one of Finland's largest national parks, Urho Kekkonen National Park, right next door. The water is so pure that you can drink straight from the streams, the air is so fresh that you can feel it deep down in your lungs, and the harmonious sound of silence will soothe your soul. The region is steeped in the rich culture of the indigenous Sámi people.
    [Show full text]